Gianfranco,
I still have to get some digitals up. Too busy to give them justice and put
up a true webpage. There are a bunch at my msn site though. let me take a
peek and see if I can put up a URL.
Like Frank, I took quite a few with film. I will be picking them up on
Monday if I cannot get
Peter J. Alling remarked:
Frank, I'm surprised, some of these are really quite good.
That's a little harsh, isn't it? :-)
Ryan,
Thanks for the comments. I suspect if you hung around the lion area
for quite a while perhaps you would get a better shot. They don't
seem like they like to move around too much. I was shooting with the
longest lens I have (K 300/4) and there were some guys there with some
real bazookas
Hey Frank,
There is no need for shouting or foul language. If you cant debate a
point like and adult, do us all a favour, dont debate it at all.
The subject is photography and Pentax lenses and I will stop debating a
point when I decide that I dont want to debate it anymore thank you
very
Now you have blown it. This doesn't belong on the list anymore than
the other accusations. President speeches offend me.
Please do not do so. Thanks
fra
Antonio, who wrote:
Hey Frank,
There is no need for shouting or foul language. If you cant debate a
point like and adult, do us all a favour, dont debate it at all.
also wrote (to Christian):
What a load of rubish. You are just being contrary because I said it
was a dog.
Antonio, there
Saturday, June 12, 2004, 5:08:14 AM, Butch wrote:
BB We actually use chlorine bleach in water to clean the stabilizer tanks if
BB they get too scummy with algae. I agree with Mike that changing the water
BB regularly would be the best option. How hard is draining and refilling the
BB water bath
Ryan, Christian and I differ as to our judgement of the lens. I state
my views clearly and leave others to make their own. There is no need
for shouting or foul language. If I think someone is talking rubish I
will tell them, that is different. There is plenty of room for
disagrement and
Chrissy,
I thought we were debating a point about a lens, not having an
argument. Why is it that when I make valid points in a debate, points
that go without response, I then either get criticised for being off
topic or in this instance arguing! Given the company the 135mm is in a
$20
I need to make a withdrawal from the PDML wisdom bank, please.
I am getting the impression, that is is getting harder to get decent film
development these days. Is this true? I know my digital images are very
sharp due to the smaller format/better DOF. But I also know that film images
can be
This probably has been posted before, but I was browsing the uk.rec.humour
newsgroup (needed a break from the troll activity at aus.photo and
rec.photo.equipment.35mm) and trust finding this link..
http://www.hermes.net.au/bayling/repair.html
Cheers,
Ryan
Jens,
I have noticed this too. I dont think pro-labs help much either, it
depends on the lab. Personally I have found a lab near me that works
for me and just stick with them. I get the impression that with the
move to digital, the old optical process is not getting the attention
it deserves.
Excellent!!! I bet you couldn't sell that one on eBay LOL
John Whittingham
Technician
-- Original Message ---
From: Ryan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 20:29:38 +1000
Subject: Yellowing on a 50 1.4 SMC Tak ROFL!!
This probably has been
shoot some ISO 50 print film and compare the results when processed in a
professional lab with your *istD results. be sure you are comparing prints
at the same sizes.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 6:26
Hi,
I have noticed this too. I dont think pro-labs help much either, it
depends on the lab. Personally I have found a lab near me that works
for me and just stick with them. I get the impression that with the
move to digital, the old optical process is not getting the attention
it
On 11/6/04, GONZ, discombobulated, offered:
Great snaps Cotty. Love the one with the alien and the bridge.
You're commentary made my laugh, you are a natural comedian. Looks like
you guys had a lot of fun. Are you doing it next year again?
Thanks. I just think that sometimes we take things
Well, if you aren't heartedly sick of them by now, here are some of my GFM
nature photos. Nothing fantastic, though I did get shots of all the animals. But
the whole time I was, I was wishing for longer glass.
Some images will be slightly familiar by now. ;-)
On 11/6/04, CORY, discombobulated, offered:
Cotty gets the award for the best snap of me so far.
Only problem is, he placed me in a grouping where my piddly little 70-210
zoom looks simply pitiful next to those HUGE lenses.
Hence 'small but perfectly formed' ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
Pentax-F 50/1.7 $75
Used but in very good condition
Got back my first GFM roll today. Discovered that I suck as a
landscape/nature photog, so I'll spare you the grief. These were taken the
first day, so many of the contingent had yet to arrive. They were also
taken with the MX, and since I used the LX as the flash cam, no night (ie:
party
Spectacular, Cotty!
I'm glad you put Tan to my left (right, on the screen), for the one where
I'm looking out the corner of my eyes. Whatta hoot!!
Great stuff. Thanks for posting them.
Thanks mate - much appreciated.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
Great people shots. Lots of fun. Thanks for sharing.
Paul
Cheers Paul. You on coarse for next year?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
On 11/6/04, FRANK, discombobulated, offered:
I'd take Tan over that Spears chick any day of the week.
I bet Britney can't handle an *istD like our Tanja!! She's My Type of
Girl!!
LOL
Uh oh, better put some bromide in his tea.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 2:04 AM
Subject: RE: Testing
Lasse,
Is it me, or have you been away.
It's you. You have been away.
To Grandfather Mountain.
That was in the U.S. of A.
Remember? It was only last week.
Kinda
On 11/6/04, FAIRYGIRL, discombobulated, offered:
Cotty, those are fantastic shots, it feels like I am still there. I can't
believe that I am a world away from everyone yet again...
I love those papped shots of tv, they are so funny. And that one of him
looking like he is about to punch me, we
Thanks for sharing - it brings out much of the fun that was there and
even a few things I missed out on.
Bruce
You're welcome Bruce. I'm sorry if i didn't post everyone, there were
some shots that were utter bollocks and I digitally ripped them to shreds !
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O)
Yes, completely optical/chemical process is what works best for me. I
had some pics done at Snappy Snaps in London last time I was there and
they were awfull. If they were scanning the negs and then priting that
explains it. I would have to differ therefore with you view that
quality has gone
A second reading reveals that Cotty was replying to Treena, not Tanja.
Oh well, just substitute appropriate names where necessary, and substitute
Pentax for *istD (since I don't know if Treena has one).
Or, better yet, just ignore my earlier post. Now that I think of it, just
ignore all my
Antonio,
Ryan, Christian and I differ as to our judgement of the lens. I state
my views clearly and leave others to make their own. There is no need
for shouting or foul language. If I think someone is talking rubish I
will tell them, that is different. There is plenty of room for
Hi Cotty,
You're shots are really good. And motivating... I must admit that I've
seen the pictures and read the stores of all you lucky GFM attendants
with envy ;-)
I'd love to do it again next year, although I might just arrange a
different format, involving my own transport and slower agenda.
Hi all,
I have shot almost a thousand RAW images now with the *ISTD, and noticed
that a few images turned out to be corrupted when trying to process them.
You can't tell this from looking at the preview on the camera, probably because
that uses the embedded JPG data rather than the real RAW data
Of course. I meant to say the M 135/3.5.
On Jun 12, 2004, at 1:56 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
The SMC 2.5/135mm is not an M, it's a K.
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 12. juni 2004
Hmmm I might jsut do that - except I don't have a *ist D.
(I bought a MZ-Z, a scanner and a SONY DSC F717 (appr. same cost as a *ist D
body) instead.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Most of these are very nice, it's really hard to get good animal photos
even if they're more or less captive.
I especially like the otter...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, if you aren't heartedly sick of them by now, here are some of my GFM
nature photos. Nothing fantastic, though I did get
By now Frank knows most of what I say is tongue in cheek.
John Francis wrote:
Peter J. Alling remarked:
Frank, I'm surprised, some of these are really quite good.
That's a little harsh, isn't it? :-)
At our lab we still process considerably more film than digital prints,
although our minilab is digital (Fuji Frontier 375). I would guess that
close to half of the film we process though is from one time use cameras,
which will probably keep 400 and 800 ISO films profitable for film makers
for
... and I might wait for the new baby *ist D this autumn - like the D70 it
might even be better (image quality) than some more expensive models! I
guess Pentax has to do something about the sharpness issue, which a lot of
reviews (and some PDML'ers) seem to be complaining about.
'Hmmm I
John Francis wrote:
Peter J. Alling remarked:
Frank, I'm surprised, some of these are really quite good.
That's a little harsh, isn't it? :-)
JOhn, I laughed so loud at your one liner as I
browsed the GFM stuff I worry
I might have awoken the sleeping Scrabble star in
my livingroom.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, if you aren't heartedly sick of them by now, here are some of my GFM
nature photos. Nothing fantastic, though I did get shots of all the animals. But
the whole time I was, I was wishing for longer glass.
Some images will be slightly familiar by now. ;-)
My lab is using Fuji Frontier exclusively because they aren't willing to
expend resources maintaining their optical equipment. The Frontier is new
and they get better contract support right now. I would guess that using the
Frontier makes their life easier also??? For the most part I like the
By optical I mean shining a light through a negative to get a print
rather than priting a scanned negative from a digital file.
Antonio
On 12 Jun 2004, at 16:17, Jens Bladt wrote:
Thanks, but
There's no optical process - just chemistry (film development only).
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Robert Leigh Woerner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: Film and Development
The enhanced look good very well be due to the person operating the
machine. I quite often adjust the exposure on my
WR Jobo wants you to buy their biocide.
Usual marketing :) I am pretty much immune.
WR If you can still get old style C-41 stabilizer, a wee bit of that
WR will do it (it's formadehyde).
WR Of course, it smells awful and is relatively toxic.
WR I just put a very small amount of chlorine
Spurred by Rob Studdert's fantastic results with his 125 f2.5 Voigtlander
Cosina Apo Lanthar, I thought of reading up on what else Voigtlander
offered.
Amongst the cheaper lenses, I noticed the 19-35 3.5-4.5 Ultragon was coated
with VMV or Voigtlander's own coating www.voigtlander.com. Also, I
Tony;
Do you even read my e-mails? I said it was a good lens for $30 not $20.
Furthermore I'd buy another one for $30 if I was so inclined before spending
$135 - $165 on ebay for the K or $45-$65 for the M. The cost of the
lens is a function of Market value not quality. The lens in question
Hi,
Cotty wrote:
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps
As idiosyncratic as we have come to expect.which _is_ a compliment...
The alien does it for me...
mike
In a message dated 6/12/2004 7:42:20 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
You know, there are quite a few lovely shots there
Marnie -
even if you did use a dark side camera. :)
annsan
-
Hehehehehehe. Thanks.
Wait until you see Jostein's animal pics. I hope he puts
In a message dated 6/12/2004 7:25:40 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Most of these are very nice, it's really hard to get good animal photos
even if they're more or less captive.
I especially like the otter...
-
Thanks! Yup, it is.
I like the way they eat. They
The bears were especially hard to shoot. They were moving around a lot.
And
they were very dark against bright/light grass. I'll be curious to see if
anyone got some decent shots of them. (Don't think I've seen any on PDML
yet. They
were in the trees a lot.)
Marnie aka Doe :-)
Well, here's
Hi,
Frantisek Vlcek wrote:
presently, changing the water is a PITA, because of placement of the
tank (I don't have that much space where it is now) nearly on floor,
and the drain is of course the lowest point. When I manage to put
it elsewhere, it will not be such a big problem. It is
BW Of course, they are not up to the best standards of professional
BW hand-made prints (chemical or digital), but in my opinion and
BW experience the quality of standard prints has improved significantly
BW since the introduction of digital mini-labs.
I have a different opinion. Both the
Ryan Lee wrote:
This probably has been posted before, but I was browsing the uk.rec.humour
newsgroup (needed a break from the troll activity at aus.photo and
rec.photo.equipment.35mm) and trust finding this link..
http://www.hermes.net.au/bayling/repair.html
The pitiful thing is that, if he'd just
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/GFMNature/Pages/gfm5.html
You have vegetarian otters in the USA?
mike
You're shots are really good. And motivating... I must admit that I've
seen the pictures and read the stores of all you lucky GFM attendants
with envy ;-)
Bugs
Ny, thanks Doc.
/Bugs
All the more incentive to try and come along next year. We could do with
a doctor in the house - you could
I get a lot of quotes and captions from films, the Ewoks obviously being
Star Wars. There's bonus points if anyone knows what film this line is
from:
these things always travel in pairs.
Debbie Does Dallas?
--
Cheers,
Bob
Nope. Give you a clue - it's a Woody Allen film.
On 12/6/04, PAUL MOTORMA STENQUIST, discombobulated, offered:
I hope so. This year I was in the midst of a disaster, which I haven't
quite resolved yet. But I hope to be ready and able by next May.
Paul
If you do, what kinda car you planning on turning up in :-D
There are *fantastic* venues
I thought about this. The GFM habitats are really special places, and in
some ways far removed from a 'zoo' setting. They harbour animals that
have been injured or are not fit to return to the wild for whatever
reason. Keeping animals confined goes right against my grain and I really
don't
Okay folks, here's a gen-u-ine question with gen-u-ine Pentax content.
In Washington I was able to crack my pile (blecch) and get to grips with
a new lens, the Canon 24-70 2.8 - and immediately I noticed it did one
thing which surprised me.
At 70mm, the lens is compact (LOL) and at it's 'normal'
I think some cameras oversharpen. The *ist-D seems just about right
when set to maximum sharpness. For those images where more sharpness
is desired, the RAW converter in PhotoShop CS does a beautiful job,
probably better than any in-camera software could do.
Paul
On Jun 12, 2004, at 10:26 AM,
On 12/6/04, STEVE DJ, discombobulated, offered:
- The 18 ft lens definitely captures the ambiance of the crowd
- Good shot of Mark.
- I too enjoyed the phrase Cougar Enrichment. It sounds so much
better than Get the cameras ready we're gonna throw out the raw meat.
Nicely done.
Thanks Steve,
Everything you always wanted to know about sex but were afraid to ask
Chrissy
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I get a lot of quotes and captions from films, the Ewoks obviously
being
Star Wars. There's bonus points if anyone knows what film this line is
from:
Wow, is that slow, it took almost 4 seconds to load. (glad I ain't on a 300 baud
connection though).
Cotty wrote:
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps
Warning - one large page with 43 pics (non larger than 60k), dial-uppers:
go make a nice hot cup of tea-earl-grey-hot while it loads.
--
graywolf
Its amazing boys and girls.
Set up a couple of filters and suddenly fully 1/3 of the content of
the PDML, all of it apparently randomly generated noise, judging from
a cursory QC inspection, goes straight to the bit bucket.
It's a beautiful thing.
William Robb
Bill, I am shortly unsubbing
HI Cotty,
If I drive that many miles, it will be in my daily driver, which at the
moment is a PT Cruiser. My 55 Chevy gets only about 1000 miles per
year. It's hard enough to keep it looking new at that rate. But I bet
it would be a nice place to shoot some cars. I always have a tough time
Hi Marnie,
There are many nice shots in there. If you got some longer glass, it
looks like you'd have to take a few steps backwards before
shooting...:-)
I'm reluctant to show any more of mine now.
Thanks for sharing.
Jostein
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Thanks for compiling the links, Malcolm, and for including my site...:-)
See below.
From: Malcolm Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marnie
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/gfm/gfm.html
Mark R
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/gfm2004.htm
Jostein
http://www.oksne.net
Cotty
HAR!
tan.
-Original Message-
From: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 13 June 2004 1:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Yellowing on a 50 1.4 SMC Tak ROFL!!
Ryan Lee wrote:
This probably has been posted before, but I was browsing the uk.rec.humour
newsgroup
In a message dated 6/12/2004 8:23:16 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://groups.msn.com/BillOwensPhotos/shoebox.msnw?action=ShowPhotoPhotoID=82
Bill
Definitely shows up better against rock than grass.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
In a message dated 6/12/2004 8:34:32 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You have vegetarian otters in the USA?
mike
---
That puzzled me. But both the otters and cougar were eating some kind of
melon. (I tried to keep the melon out of the shots because I thought it
Jens, I work the same way you do. I haven't been able to find a lab
that consistently develops my negatives
without scratches, water spots, or embedded crud showing up in the
emulsion. Sadly this more than anything else
is driving me to investigate digital, at least for color. (If the BW
Hi Rob,
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 23:53:31 +1000, Rob Studdert wrote:
I have found 3 out of the 1000 I have sofar that have this corruption, all have
been shot using SanDisk 1Gb or Sandisk Ultra 512Mb cards.
In all cases it may have been a shot from a short sequence, so the in-camara
buffer
Well, it may have been stupid, but it made him angry enough to steal
the email address.
Sorry :-)
DagT
På 12. jun. 2004 kl. 18.32 skrev Anthony Farr:
Hey, you can insult a guy, but that was just idiotic, sorry man.
Regards,
Anthony Farr
-Original Message-
From: Dag T [mailto:[EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its amazing boys and girls.
Set up a couple of filters and suddenly fully 1/3 of the content of
the PDML, all of it apparently randomly generated noise, judging from
a cursory QC inspection, goes straight to the bit bucket.
It's a beautiful thing.
Yes it is.
William Robb
I can actually live with the photo you posted of me, frank. :-) Nice ones,
all around.
But want to see more.
Marnie aka Doe
Most?
(besides, John put a smiley on it)
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By now Frank knows most of what I say is tongue in cheek.
John Francis wrote:
Peter J.
Marnie,
MUCH more next week. If for no other reason, to piss of those who are tired
of GFM chatter. vbg
Glad you liked. g
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
Just wanted to clarify things, what with the current unpleasantness on
the list, (it would be difficult to even dignify it
by calling it a flame war).
frank theriault wrote:
Most?
(besides, John put a smiley on it)
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
Besides, sometimes I make heartfelt comments, really... ;-)
frank theriault wrote:
Most?
(besides, John put a smiley on it)
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
pessimist fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By
Hi,
Henri Toivonen wrote:
I got an offer to buy a Vivitar 24/2 for about $40
Can anyone tell me some info about it?
Is it any good?
I have a SMC-M 28/3.5 I use as my wide-angle prime, and I'm thinking of
getting an even wider one.
I had a Vivitar 24/2, then a Kiron 24/2, and now an SMC-A
Yes, Peter,
We live in strange and troubling times...
vbg
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just wanted to clarify things, what with the current
Marnie wrote:
Oops, sorry, I was mucking around last night and changed the url.
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/GFMPeople/
http://members.aol.com/eactivsit/GFMNature/Pages/
Not consistent, I know. I am trying to revamp my site. Right
now the index to eactivist pulls up only PAWs and I
Ahh, I just convinced the others that your position is no longer needed (grin).
No, actually, I only fit into the incorporate bored room.
I want to thank you again for the darkroom stuff. It was far more than I
expected. If you bought it new you must have had it since college. I did not
Marnie:
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/GFMPeople/
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/GFMNature/Pages/
Mark Roberts:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/gfm2004.htm
Jostein:
http://www.oksne.net
Cotty:
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps
Graywolf:
Thanks all for your participation in my film problem.
But - I am NOT TALKING ABOUT PRINTS. It's exclusively about unsharp negs.
Some of them look as if they were developed in the dishwasher along with the
pots, plates, cups, knives and forks. I never order prints from negs
anymore.
I take
graywolf wrote:
They also spend some time playing with the animals. Tossing them balls, toys,
etc. Makes life a bit more interesting for the animals, and brings them up so
the visitors can seem them.
These animals are all about 80% tame, though AnnSan and I saw a bit of a spat
between a
Or Mercedes vs. Volkswagen.
I'm not saying which car is to be copmpared to which camera brand. But in my
country 85% of all taxies (professional cars) are from Mercedes Benz.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
They were probably talking about all those PDML'ers they saw hanging around.
Damn, useless photographers, and them with the Pentax's are the worse of the lot.
--
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Oh yeah, guys, the bird songs I so ineptly tried
to capture on my mini recorder turned out
to be the eagles! all
Hi Paul,
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 10:03:05 -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I do own an *ist-D, and the software works fine whether it identifies
the lens or not. In fact, with K or M lenses, it does not identify the
lens, and, quite obviously, it can't. I've shot about 5000 RAW images
and have not
Oops! Sorry! Even a note on the monitor does not seem to help. Meant as an off
list comment. Please, pretend you never saw it unless your name is Stan.
--
graywolf wrote:
Ahh, I just convinced the others that your position is no longer needed
(grin). No, actually, I only fit into the
When I was there, they fed the otters, fish. And no, it was not very
clean and neat, but the otters really went for it.
Bruce
Saturday, June 12, 2004, 8:52:35 AM, you wrote:
Eac In a message dated 6/12/2004 8:34:32 AM Pacific Standard Time,
Eac [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Eac You have
Wow, this discussion sure took off.
Those of you who gave your opinion of the lens in
question based on your experience, thank you. Those
who dislike the lens will probably be happy to hear
I've decided not to buy it, instead I found a SMC
Pentax-M 135/3.5 cheaper than the Takumar was. I
really
Jon M wrote:
Wow, this discussion sure took off.
Those of you who gave your opinion of the lens in
question based on your experience, thank you. Those
who dislike the lens will probably be happy to hear
I've decided not to buy it, instead I found a SMC
Pentax-M 135/3.5 cheaper than the Takumar
i have had this happen only when the batteries run out during a sequence.
this is because i am unable to tell when the batteries are actually low or
whether the camera's power indicator says they are low. if you are using an
external card reader, i would most suspect a problem with your reader.
the DA 16-45 works the way yours does. no other Pentax zoom i tried works
that way. the Sigma 24-70/2.8 gets longer when zooming wider.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 11:34 AM
Subject: Zoom lens
On Jun 12, 2004, at 2:18 PM, Jens Bladt wrote:
Over the years,
Pentax may well have put out more, and the interoperability across
generations has only recently been compromised.
In what way? With the new firmware, the K and M lenses can be used on
the *ist D with what amounts to ap priority
On Jun 12, 2004, at 3:22 PM, Jon M wrote:
instead I found a SMC
Pentax-M 135/3.5 cheaper than the Takumar was.
Congratulations. That's a very sharp and contrasty lens. Probably one
of the best bargains in Pentax land. Ditto that a 200/4 you want. The M
200/4 is also very good, although it
On 12/6/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, offered:
Everything you always wanted to know about sex but were afraid to ask
Chrissy
Bingo. Cigar?
BTW - - Chrissy ??
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
On 12/6/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, offered:
If I drive that many miles, it will be in my daily driver, which at the
moment is a PT Cruiser. My 55 Chevy gets only about 1000 miles per
year. It's hard enough to keep it looking new at that rate. But I bet
it would be a nice place to
More stupid comments from his highness the king of stupid.
(LOL)
Dag T
Blimey, it takes a fair bit to rattle a Norwegian's cage!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Butch and all you other guys that run labs:
I've received some pretty dirty stuff back from the local discount place,
but never anything optically fuzzy. I've since moved my business to
another place.
Help me understand, since I've only developed black and white negs and
color slides at home.
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
