Must have been a booger to clean too..
:-)
Simon
-
See the new Pentax *ist series camera - the SE
http://members.iinet.net.au/~celsim/pentax/pentax.htm
Doesn't you scorpion moustache deserve a Pentax?
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jun 24, 2004, at 5:13 AM, That Guy wrote:
I don't see much mention of these lenses on this list.
(snip)
The F* 300mm f/4.5 is pretty highly regarded, by me at least. Its so
sharp you could cut yourself just looking at the slides.
A lot of people choose this lens over the FA* version as it
Frank,
I'm glad that you were able to feel a bit of what I felt in that
location. It was very serene and quiet and was nice just to be there.
Thanks for commenting.
Bruce
Wednesday, June 23, 2004, 7:07:22 PM, you wrote:
ft If a good photograph evokes emotion, then this is a very good photo
On Jun 24, 2004, at 1:49 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
I think it's great being able to zoom in when an image has detail that
would
otherwise be lost in a size reduction. If you wish to move to lowest
common
denominator then images should probably only be published at 600 pixel
max
length regardless
I have just looked at mine.
It's called SCA 374/2 AF M1. It seems to work fine with PZ-1 and MZ-S. What
does the M2 do, that M1 doesn't?
Regards
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 24.
I did it once, unfortunately I had no choice. Since you do not want to mess
with the pentaprism or screen (you can't anyway w/o the proper skill and
insturments), the only thing you can do is to adjust the mirror rest arm
underneatn the mirror (near the DOF preview arm). It was held by 2 cross
The F* 300mm f/4.5 is pretty highly regarded, by me at least. Its so sharp
you could cut yourself just looking at the slides.
Unfortunately, it doesn't do well with A2X-S. :-(
A lot of people choose this lens over the FA* version as it has a tripod
mount. Optically the two lenses are
I just found something interesting (at least for me) when trying to
fix a FA 4/28-70 lens that wouldn't autofocus properly. On focal lengths
longer than 50 it would not stop at precise focus but run past it and back
the full travel, then stop, blinking 'unable to focus' in the finder. It did
that
Hi!
This PAW is very different from anything I've posted before, not so much in
the subject matter, but in the presentation. Maybe you'll enjoy it ;-))
The image is 800x646 and a little less than 200K. Some of you may have to
scroll a bit in your browser, but that couldn't be helped.
Hi,
I don't kow if anybody noticed it, but it dissappeared from Pentax Germany
(Europe) pricelist just like MZ-S and few others before. IT makes me wonder
- what are they preparing? DA tele zoom in similar range but in smaller case
and lighter? FAAA* lenses with USM and IS for FF Papa-D? New
on 24.06.04 8:49, keller.schaefer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So apparently, the the AF system takes into account the focal length, when
calculating how much it has to displace the lens (or parts of it) to achieve
focus. Somewhere in the lens the displacement/distance curve for each focal
Hi Sven,
That's interesting to me. It can help understanding strange behaviours when
autofocusing some lenses. Thanks for sharing.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: keller.schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 8:49 AM
Subject: FA 4/28-70 -
Hi!
This morning, on a Birmingham, Michigan, street corner:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2468895size=lg
Paul, this is way cute. I spent little time trying to find a word
other than cute, but couldn't. I have similarly cute shots of my
daughter handling some rabbits and even
Simon King wrote:
See the new Pentax *ist series camera - the SE
http://members.iinet.net.au/~celsim/pentax/pentax.htm
Doesn't you scorpion moustache deserve a Pentax?
Great!
Dario
Perhaps they finally noticed it didn't sell after so many years? Personally,
I am not that optimiztic. Remember the A70-210/4 was replaced by
F70-210/4-5.6? Perhaps Pentax will go the f4 route since Pentax f2.8 zooms
don't sell. Or they might just make some DA f2.8 zooms to keep the cost
down?
Boris a contact sheet has all the images running in the same
direction. Changing that one image to a vertical would have ruined the
flow of the images substantially (I did consider it, BTW, not a good idea,
imo). Yeah, I know I could have done it easily, but the change would have
been at
Just testing - my posts are missing somehere in virtual space.
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
We were talking a lot about *istD improvments that could be done via
firmware. And if Pentax USA is to be direct Pentax subsidiary soon we could
put together our wishes and send them a letter which hopefully would travel
to Pentax design headquarters in Japan too. What do you think? Is there
The FA*70-200/2.8 has been a special order item for quite some time already.
Which is sad, because it's one of the best lenses in that zoom range regardless
of brand.
Now if they could make a new version where they just remove the autozoom motors
and put in some gyro stuff...:-)
Jostein
on 24.06.04 14:14, Nenad Djurdjevic at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe I'm misunderstanding you but if your wishlist is for the ISO value to
be displayed in the viewfinder then I didn't think it could be done because
the LCD display has nowhere it can display the set ISO value. The only
I wrote earlier:
However I suppose ISO value could be displayed it instead of the remaining
number recordable images. Depends whether you are willing to lose one
viewfinder indicator to gain another.
Actually, I was right the first time because ISO goes to 3200 (4 digits) and
remaining number
Sylwek,
Lowest shutter speed was 1/20s. Typical speeds were 1/60 to 1/250.
Thanks for appreciation to both you and Frantisek.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 3:14 PM
Subject: Re: PAW - Concert
on 24.06.04 14:27, Nenad Djurdjevic at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I was right the first time because ISO goes to 3200 (4 digits) and
remaining number recordable images display only has 3 digits - so it can't
be done.
That's no problem :-) It is enough that you would see 16 or 32 for
I wrote:
Actually, I was right the first time because ISO goes to 3200 (4 digits)
and
remaining number recordable images display only has 3 digits - so it
can't
be done.
Sylwek replied:
That's no problem :-) It is enough that you would see 16 or 32 for 1600 or
3200 respectively + h
ND Actually, I was right the first time because ISO goes to 3200 (4 digits) and
ND remaining number recordable images display only has 3 digits - so it can't
ND be done.
Ugh Ogh. How about 1.6K or 3.2K ? Is it too hard to understand ? ;-)
Or similar...
I don't think though trash would be the
Maybe something like hold this button down and press the shutter
release This would instantly fire the shutter no matter the focus
state. I'm not sure I want it any simpler than this as I don't want to
be accidently changing the WB.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/24/04 07:37AM
Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Frantisek Vlcek wrote:
ND Actually, I was right the first time because ISO goes to 3200 (4 digits) and
ND remaining number recordable images display only has 3 digits - so it can't
ND be done.
Ugh Ogh. How about 1.6K or 3.2K ? Is it too hard to understand ? ;-)
Or
I would like to see ISO displayed somewhere all the time (the top LCD
panel is OK) since I have changed it and forgotten. I don't need it in
the viewfinder , though.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
That really is a bright idea!
If I had a menu option Do you want 'ISO' or 'remaining pictures' displayed in
the finder? I would certainly go for ISO!
And then being able to adjust it (as you described) while looking through the
finder - brilliant.
Sven
Zitat von Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL
on 24.06.04 15:04, Nenad Djurdjevic at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess I would be willing to put up with a less than perfect display. All
too often I forget to reset ISO and find I have taken some shots in good
light at an unecessarily high ISO. If there was some sort of indication in
the
I think we could see more of the f4 zooms. Pentax can make an opticaaly
superior lens but keep the price down. Although, to be honest, a
lesser 2.8 zoom at Tokina prices might serve them better. OTOH, slow
zooms might be a good paln with in-camera IS.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/24/04 03:28AM
16h and 32h would work fine for me...
Sven
Zitat von Anders Hultman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Frantisek Vlcek wrote:
ND Actually, I was right the first time because ISO goes to 3200 (4
digits) and
ND remaining number recordable images display only has 3 digits - so it
on 24.06.04 15:09, Frantisek Vlcek at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think though trash would be the best button for it. One could
easily forgot he is in PLAY mode and try to change ISO there...
Perhaps one of the four PLAY mode buttons?
trash button is not bad as it is easy to access by
on 24.06.04 15:14, Steve Desjardins at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe something like hold this button down and press the shutter
release This would instantly fire the shutter no matter the focus
state. I'm not sure I want it any simpler than this as I don't want to
be accidently changing
Anders Hultman wrote:
1.6K and 3.2K still are four symbols, but 1K6 and 3K2 may fit. If the
display isn't figures only, and actually can show a K at all...
I had a look and I don't think the display can do a 'K'. I believe it can
do an 'H' however - if that's any use ;-)
on 24.06.04 15:19, keller.schaefer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I had a menu option Do you want 'ISO' or 'remaining pictures' displayed in
the finder? I would certainly go for ISO!
And then being able to adjust it (as you described) while looking through the
finder - brilliant.
Exactly -
on 24.06.04 15:24, keller.schaefer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
16h and 32h would work fine for me...
And it is easiest to implement as I suspect that this display has only 3
digits of 7-segment type.
--
Pozdrowienia
Sylwek
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, keller.schaefer wrote:
1.6K and 3.2K still are four symbols, but 1K6 and 3K2 may fit. If the
display isn't figures only, and actually can show a K at all...
16h and 32h would work fine for me...
Ah. Excellent solution! Three symbols and possible to show on a 7-segment
On 24 Jun 2004 at 21:50, Leon Altoff wrote:
Since then I have been searching for details on how to truely clean the
sensor. I spoke to CR Kennedy who cleaned mine once and did a
wonderful job. They actually use dry nitrogen to blow out the dust.
The use cleaning swabs only if absolutely
Nenand said, among other things:
I guess I would be willing to put up with a less than perfect display. All
too often I forget to reset ISO and find I have taken some shots in good
light at an unecessarily high ISO. If there was some sort of indication in
the viewfinder that would reduce
Steve Desjardins wrote:
I would like to see ISO displayed somewhere all the time (the top LCD
panel is OK) since I have changed it and forgotten. I don't need it in
the viewfinder , though.
Once again, I had a look at my *istD and the top display only has numeric
values for shutter speed,
On 24 Jun 2004 at 11:39, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
We were talking a lot about *istD improvments that could be done via
firmware. And if Pentax USA is to be direct Pentax subsidiary soon we could put
together our wishes and send them a letter which hopefully would travel to
Pentax design
Steve Desjardins wrote:
I think we could see more of the f4 zooms. Pentax can make an opticaaly
superior lens but keep the price down. Although, to be honest, a
lesser 2.8 zoom at Tokina prices might serve them better. OTOH, slow
zooms might be a good paln with in-camera IS.
How about an
on 24.06.04 15:36, Rob Studdert at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had my little list up for a while, it's probably due for some updates :-)
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/Pentax_digi_wish-list/
Well, our list is getting longer ;-) Good, the more we send them the better
chances to
on 24.06.04 15:24, Steve Desjardins at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we could see more of the f4 zooms. Pentax can make an opticaaly
superior lens but keep the price down. Although, to be honest, a
lesser 2.8 zoom at Tokina prices might serve them better. OTOH, slow
zooms might be a
ERN wrote:
Does this camera indicate in the viewfinder what f-stop and shutter speed
it's
going to use to make the exposure? and, if so, could you not develop the
habit
of looking at those numbers to see whether they imply that you are using
an
unnecessarily high ISO?
I understand what
This one time, at band camp, Leon Altoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm also waiting for some Eclipse fluid and Pec pads to arrive so I can
try them. Between them and the dry nitrogen I should be happy. I do a
lot of macro shooting at f22 to get a good depth of field and that
tends to show up
Yes, that seems the best solution imho.
In fact, you don't really need that 'h' letter -
because the ISO starts from 200, so you can have
2,4,8,16 and 32. But the 'h' can tell you if you're
looking at the remaining picture indicator or at the
ISO setting.
Alex Sarbu
--- Anders Hultman [EMAIL
One day i'll take BW pictures like you and Frank. Until then i'll enjoy looking at
them.:-)
I really like the composition here Shel. Looks like the guy sitting is actually
listening.
Dave
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/paw/manbus2.html
Artsie spartsie,I like em.:-)
Number 2 and 3 are my two fav's. I like the contrast between the tree and the stone
wall
in 3.
Nice ones Herb.
Dave B
i spent the weekend running around taking
pictures for a friend's book,
that's sort of my project for
Nice grab Mark.Picture say's it all.Yo bad a bolt of lightning did'nt go off at the
time
eh.:-)
Dave
Shot this one a couple of weeks ago. See what
ya think...
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d401621.jpg
ist-D, Tokina 28-70/2.6-2.8
--
Mark
The green,blue and grey blend so well in that shot Bruce. Looks like the DA 16-45 works
well.
Dave B
This was taken while walking around the park
near my house. There is
a stream running through the middle that beavers have dammed up in
several places
I finished Higg school in the VERY early 70's and the school was divided into 2
groups.Hippies(me) and
Greasers(mostly guys hanging on to the 50's taking shop classes.g)).They mostly drove
the Chevy
II, IMSMK. I always like that car ,but the 57 Belair is my dreamer.:-).
Nice shot Paul
Dave
Thanks Dave. I always liked the Chevy IIs as well, although my car is a
55 BelAir. Whether one likes it or not, at least the American
automobile styling of the fifities had something to say.
Paul
On Jun 24, 2004, at 11:29 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I finished Higg school in the VERY early
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Nenad Djurdjevic wrote:
Steve Desjardins wrote:
I think we could see more of the f4 zooms. Pentax can make an opticaaly
superior lens but keep the price down. Although, to be honest, a
lesser 2.8 zoom at Tokina prices might serve them better. OTOH, slow
zooms
Me three! I would love a 55-200/4 DA to go with the 16-45. Same
image quality as the 16-45. That would be superb!
Bruce
Thursday, June 24, 2004, 8:53:24 AM, you wrote:
aw On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Nenad Djurdjevic wrote:
Steve Desjardins wrote:
I think we could see more of the f4 zooms.
I wrote:
How about an f2.8 DA zoom that goes from 45-140? That would be the same
as
a 35mm 70-210 f2.8. I would buy that!
alex wetmore wrote:
Me too. I'd take an f4 version too.
I'd love to see more high quality, one stop slower than pro, smaller
lenses for Pentax. I think that
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Nenad Djurdjevic wrote:
I wrote:
How about an f2.8 DA zoom that goes from 45-140? That would be the same
as
a 35mm 70-210 f2.8. I would buy that!
alex wetmore wrote:
Me too. I'd take an f4 version too.
I'd love to see more high quality, one stop slower
testing testing 1 2 3,
The big brown fox jumped over the lazy somethingorother
Mary had a little lamb with spuds and gravy
yep, looks like it's working
Mutley snigger
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:21:36 +0200, Jostein wrote:
The FA*70-200/2.8 has been a special order item for quite some
time already. Which is sad, because it's one of the best lenses
in that zoom range regardless of brand.
I'd give my eye teeth for an FA* 80-200/2.8 ... and one day hopefully
I'll
On 24/6/04, GRAYWOLF, discombobulated, offered:
kind of looks like one of those platic tubes you put down under gravel to
keep
plants from growing up through it. Neat way to make a buck selling it as
a toy
for 5x what it costs at the building supply store. Now you hang you DSLR
from it
and do
kind of looks like one of those platic tubes you put down under gravel
to keep
plants from growing up through it. Neat way to make a buck selling it
as a toy
for 5x what it costs at the building supply store. Now you hang you
DSLR from it
and do aerial photos. The rest of us watch and laugh
I take it your on broadband now? Woo hoo.
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
testing testing 1 2 3,
The big brown fox jumped over the lazy somethingorother
Mary had a little lamb with spuds and gravy
yep, looks like it's working
Mutley snigger
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
Aha! Congratulations!
Good to see it works just fine.
keith
Cotty wrote:
testing testing 1 2 3,
The big brown fox jumped over the lazy somethingorother
Mary had a little lamb with spuds and gravy
yep, looks like it's working
Mutley snigger
Cheers,
Cotty
On Thursday 24 June 2004 11:39, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
FJW We were talking a lot about *istD improvments that could be done via
FJW firmware. And if Pentax USA is to be direct Pentax subsidiary soon we could
FJW put together our wishes and send them a letter which hopefully would travel
FJW to
Malcolm Smith:
Now come on, every one likes flying - it's crashing that people don't like.
What other form of travel could bang on about how safe it is and insist that
people depart from something called a 'terminal'?
Bus terminals, ferry terminals and even train terminals have already
been
Bad day Frank?
frank theriault wrote:
What a pile of crap!!
Cesar, how am I to know who Phyllis is? You have so many female
friends (just like me g), for all I know you could be referring to
Minolta Girl (about whom I heard nothing at GFM, BTW).
It was you saying Bet you're scared now that
I'd be hoping for the FA* to be replace with a New FA* w/o power zoom.
Seems unlikely thought...
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
on 24.06.04 9:28, Alan Chan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps they finally noticed it didn't sell after so many years? Personally,
I am not that optimiztic. Remember
Well, that's the last of my posts that Cotty'll have to read.
I figure that, as a pre-emptive strike, he'll have already kill-filed me!
vbg
-knarf
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Cotty [EMAIL
Peter,
I was having a fine day until Cesar and Jostein decided to gang up on me,
and be real mean and all that stuff...
:-(
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well don't worry, you can hate them too.
frank theriault wrote:
Peter,
I was having a fine day until Cesar and Jostein decided to gang up on
me, and be real mean and all that stuff...
:-(
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
pessimist fears it is true. -J.
My TiVo box decided to record Femme Fatale.
As there wasn't much else on, and it had a decent
cast, I decided to give it a try.
At one point, Antoni Banderas' character is trying
to get a photograph of Rebecca Romijn-Stamos' character,
using a PZ-1p and an FA* 80-200/2.8!
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Anders Hultman wrote:
Malcolm Smith:
Now come on, every one likes flying - it's crashing that people don't
like.
What other form of travel could bang on about how safe it is and insist
that
people depart from something called a 'terminal'?
Bus terminals, ferry terminals and
5645
Acquired early October 2003
Sorry for the delay in responding; I've been out of the country and away
from the camera since end of last week
==
Brian Dipert
Technical Editor: Mass Storage, Memory, Multimedia, PC Core Logic and
Peripherals, and Programmable Logic
On 24/6/04, frank theriault, discombobulated, offered:
Well, that's the last of my posts that Cotty'll have to read.
I figure that, as a pre-emptive strike, he'll have already kill-filed me!
vbg
Why Frank, all your posts I have printed off and sent to a specialist
signwriter and glass-blower
On 24/6/04, graywolf, discombobulated, offered:
Yes, but you have a dirty mind.
*Everyone* has a dirty mind, it's just that I'm past caring ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
They're not good enough photographers...
vbg ducking
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well don't worry, you can hate them too.
frank theriault wrote:
Peter,
I was having
And someone said no one bought that lens! Hah!! vbg
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pentax List)
Subject:
I don't know if it can be done through firmware, but I vote for improved
flash TTL control.
Indeed. This would be nice.
On the ISO stuff, I'd be happy enough to always have ISO in the viewfinder
and frames on the top. But a menu to choose would be fine too. Either way,
it has to be clear
Kripes, Cotty,
For that kind of money, just pay to fly me over the pond:
I'll whisper my posts into your ear...
-frank
g
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL
On 24/6/04, frank theriault, discombobulated, offered:
Kripes, Cotty,
For that kind of money, just pay to fly me over the pond:
I'll whisper my posts into your ear...
LOL.
Right now I could do with a shoulder massage. Been filming in a rowdy and
crowded pub in Oxford, watching England go out
Sheesh, and you guys have a go at me for being OT? Why dont you email
each other with your private chit chat?
A.
On 25 Jun 2004, at 00:55, Cotty wrote:
On 24/6/04, frank theriault, discombobulated, offered:
Kripes, Cotty,
For that kind of money, just pay to fly me over the pond:
I'll whisper my
Well, my friend, it seems that you've given up on the concept of focus.
OK, I've come to accept that, and will no longer suggest that you get your
photos, or even a part of them, in focus. I almost said properly
focused, but that sounded so high handed (is that the term?). After all,
OOF has
Brian Dipert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5645
Acquired early October 2003
Mine is 5512...
Bought last monday (yeah, I eventually jumped in...), but it sat
on the shelf for quite some time (say, several months).
Gianfranco
=
_
__
Do you
Anders Hultman pointed out:
Bus terminals, ferry terminals and even train terminals have already
been mentioned. May I remind you that the telecom industry calls the
cell phones we carry around terminals as well. The socket where you
connect the speaker cables to your ampifier are called
Get a grip antonio, they aren't hurting anyone's feelings with THEIR posts,
and besides, I've been laughing along with them with every post.
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 25 June 2004 9:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT
Billy Abbott wrote:
amplifiers - er...there's electricity in there, that's dangerous. right?
I've got some friends who often need to set up PA gear in places
where the audience can get very close to things the operators
don't want strangers to touch, and can't always monitor it
constantly.
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a guy holding a dog. Not even his dog (Fritz belongs to
Helene). If
you knew Julian, you'd know this is actually him (hard to
explain):
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2471920
I've got lots of people and dogs shots. Some of
Hi,
My TiVo box decided to record Femme Fatale.
As there wasn't much else on, and it had a decent
cast, I decided to give it a try.
At one point, Antoni Banderas' character is trying
to get a photograph of Rebecca Romijn-Stamos' character,
using a PZ-1p and an FA* 80-200/2.8!
On British
I keep reading this but there doesn't seem to have any objective evidence to
prove the Pentax 2.8 zoom is superior. Not that I don't want to believe, but
even what I consider the most believable results from photodo doesn't give
that good score (and their results seem to match my experience so
The problem is Pentax seem to be happy with the good optics average/poor
built strategy recently. But that's understandable when they must keep the
cost down in order to compete, just hope they won't make the FA28-70/4
mistake again.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I think we could see
Geez guys, get a room will ya!
;)
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24/6/04, frank theriault, discombobulated, offered:
Kripes, Cotty,
For that kind of money, just pay to fly me over the pond:
I'll whisper my posts into your ear...
LOL.
Right now I could do with a shoulder massage. Been filming in
F lenses are hard to find used, and presumably impossible to find new.
They aren't exactly attractive, and they don't have the build quality
of even the A lenses. Manual focus with them is not great (in common with
early AF lenses from other manufacturers). Most of the good ones appear
to be
Hi Dave ...
I was only able to grab a couple of snaps before the bus took off. The
other had a scosh better composition overall, but in this one, the fellow's
head had a slight tilt that gave him more of an appearance of looking and
listening. Funny how sometimes very subtle differences in a
I'm sorry, Gonz,
Did ya wanna join us?
vbg
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT - test
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004
Oh, is Antonio still talking to me? He still hasn't figured out he's
kill-filed? My bet is Cotty's already got him kill-filed.
What a maroon. What a nin-cow-poop.
It is to laugh.
BTW, hi, Tan. g
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears
Funny how Antonio, who doesn't know me at all, calls me a bully, then,
knowing that I don't receive his posts, actually goes out of his way to try
to push my buttons.
That sort of stuff speaks volumes, you great big goofball. Pretty obvious
who the troll is, eh?
BTW, hi again, Tan. I should
Oh, come on, Shel.
Some of my photos are pretty well focused.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2378683
You just haven't commented on all of them is all.
I don't go out of my way to ~not~ focus properly. It's just that some
photos, when I look at them, speak to me ~despite~ the lack of
Frank ...
My comments were mostly tongue in cheek. Sorry you missed that. I thought
for sure you'd see the humor in those words. Don't let some jerk ruin your
sense of humor. I would never mock you. Had I been commenting to almost
anyone else I'd have worn my Somber Hat.
I had been playing
Hi Jens Bladt:
Thanks for the cooperation. i checked that site it is similar
which i hve 374/2AF(m) only dedicate with SFX series gears. M2 was the
latest for SCA 300 system Metz flashes for MZ10,Z-1/Z20/Z50/MZ5/MZ5 even
with 67II with handle as per metz werke.
Gill
100 matches
Mail list logo
