William: Get a Subaru it will put all the others to shame and run problem
free for years and years...
Vic
Sooby fan
Pentax Fan
Don't confuse lower specs in some areas with mediocre.
My freind's Mercedes Benz will only go 120 MPH, but another friend's
Porsche will go 140.
I guess the Benz
On Jul 2, 2004, at 10:36 AM, Cotty wrote:
The SR-71 makes appearances at the RIAT,
Oh man... you shouldn't have said that. I'd just about have to come
over just to see that plane. I am truly fascinated by the SR71 and I'd
love to actually see one. Getting to see one flying would be even
Did you try a Land Rover :-)
Antti-Pekka
---
Antti-Pekka Virjonen
Computec Oy, Turku Finland
Gsm: +358-500-789 753
www.computec.fi * www.estera.fi
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 5:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Hi Boris ...
WES = W.Eugene Smith. Perhaps you'll find some time to look at some of his
work.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Who (or what) is WES? Folks, have mercy, not everyone knows all the
tastes of letter soup.
Zeiss even list the true focal length in their data sheets - the Planar 1.4/50
is 51.8 mm focal length!
When I received my 24-90 I noticed that the long end was actually shorter than
my M 2/85. In the 'communication' I then had with Pentax Europe about this,
they admitted (regretted) that the
Proud to be the owner of one of the six grips beautiful work!
So am I, perhaps we should start a Custom LX Grip Owners' Club, I could be the UK
representative. Where in the world are the other five located I wonder.
AB
--
Whatever you Wanadoo:
http://www.wanadoo.co.uk/time/
This email has
ks When I received my 24-90 I noticed that the long end was actually shorter than
ks my M 2/85. In the 'communication' I then had with Pentax Europe about this,
I think it was discussed a lot on B.Dimitrov's site that lenses with
some form of internal focusing (not moving the whole lens in/out,
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
unbalanced on my dead MX, whereas the M150/3.5 isn't (not a problem for
me since I'm a KX/LX user). It's not really M small.
You must see the M80-200/4.5. I (inexperienced and weakling, mind)
found it hard to hand-hold with the -5n and grip. I shoot
On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 20:33:06 -0400, Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=37905item=3733428172rd=1ssPageName=WDVW
For the true Pentax collector. :)
At that price I'd consider buying it as a sort of fusion of my
childhood and my present. My parents
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, graywolf wrote:
One of the strange things I have noticed is that some how the idea that the K
lenses were a bit better than the M lenses, has somehow become they are a lot
better. Exaggeration by people who go by what they read somewhere rather than
their own experience I
on 02.07.04 3:29, Arturo Medina-Chavez at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, FWIW
http://www.oprit.rug.nl/otten/Comparison.html
Found on the Canon FD mount forum
Not sure how rigorous the test was conducted, but I found interesting
that for 35mm film, two scan res were used, 3200 and
Jens Bladt wrote:
Hi all
I'm going off list for some days.
A friend from London is coming over for the Copenhagen Jazz Festival.
I have booked tickets for 74 years old Ahmad Jamal (pianist with Miles
Davis quailities) Saturday.
I'll have to haul out my old Ahmad Jamal vinyl record and play it!
Subaru? That Japanese Beetle?
My 91 Camry has 267,5xx miles on it, and still gets 32mpg.
(Though I'm still working @ Honda RD!)
Collin
Sent via the WebMail system at mail.safe-t.net
Sid,
The first generation of Vivitar Series1 lenses came in M42, and IIRC they
were ES-II compatible. I have no idea if later generations of Series 1 had
screwmount versions, though. Be aware that the original Series 1 35~85/2.8
is a varifocal zoom which needs refocusing whenever the focal
--- Collin Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subaru? That Japanese Beetle?
My 91 Camry has 267,5xx miles on it, and still gets
32mpg.
(Though I'm still working @ Honda RD!)
Well since we're getting well off topic
My Honda does 140mph and 38mpg BUT, not at the same
time!! I love it
Sorry - wrong link!
It's www.dpreview.com
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 2. juli 2004 10:30
Til: [EMAIL
Sorry - wrong link!
It's www.dpreview.com
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 1. juli 2004 09:45
Til: [EMAIL
Here's the background to this minor matter; from time to time I visit local
car boot sales and on rare occasions I've seen boxes of 35mm colour slides
for sale. Nearly all of these I have looked at, put down and walked on, but
I suppose twice in 5 years I have made an offer on them (silly money,
- Original Message -
From: Dr. Shaun Canning
Subject: Re: Z1-P repair looking for parts or part camera
Pentax have only recently ceased to support older bodies such as
the
KX and K2, and some parts are still around for them if you know
where to
look.
Depends on where you live. In
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Selling pentax 35mm Trooper-subaru fan
William: Get a Subaru it will put all the others to shame and run
problem
free for years and years...
I went with a Nissan truck. I need the larger size vehicle.
Subarus are nice though. If
- Original Message -
From: Antti-Pekka Virjonen
Subject: FW: Re:Selling Pentax 35mm gear (WAS RE: Beautiful SF1n kit,
Voigtlander
Did you try a Land Rover :-)
No dealership here.
William Robb
I agree, for what it's worth.
Brian Walters wrote:
snip..
Cotty mentioned cropping out the bush on the right. I see the point but I think
the reflections at lower right are important. To me the impact is much reduced
if they are missing.
Hey! It's GREEN! ;-)
Stephen
gdr
___
Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=37905item=3733428172rd=1ssPageName=WDVW
For the true Pentax collector. :)
Hmmm, we haven't heard from the Brotherhood lately...
Stephen
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Proud to be the owner of one of the six grips beautiful work!
So am I, perhaps we should start a Custom LX Grip Owners' Club,
I could be the UK representative. Where in the world
Graywolf wrote:
Rumor is that Nikon recruited the designer away from Pentax. I've even heard that from
Pentax people, so I guess it may be true.
REPLY:
It is true.
Pål
I read abook along time ago called Thunderbolt by Bob Johnson. He had 28 kills
during the war, all flying P-47s. At one point he was getting shot up by an FW190 but
his plane kept flying. The German pilot hammered him with cannon fire, and confused
that the plane didn't go down, came up
Hi guys and gals,
I'm in the mood to purchase a 16-45, but I'd like to hear some
first hand experiences from those who own it and made a side by
side comparison with at least one of the lenses above.
I recall somebody said that the 16-45 is definitely sharper than
the 24-90 at similar FL, is it
on 02.07.04 16:54, Gianfranco Irlanda at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys and gals,
I'm in the mood to purchase a 16-45, but I'd like to hear some
first hand experiences from those who own it and made a side by
side comparison with at least one of the lenses above.
I recall somebody said
I'll do it tonight or tomorrow morning. What storage mode, ie., RAW, TIFF, ***L,
etc?
Well, I have a dial-up connection. I think unsharpened jpegs (***L) of around 100k
will tell me what I need to know. Make that 100k jpegs of a small area of brick wall
with lots of texture..
Appreciate it,
OK. I just crop it down to 100k or so.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/02/04 11:21AM
I'll do it tonight or tomorrow morning. What storage mode, ie., RAW,
Looks like a first frame (probably #00) when I load a fresh film.
You know, the one the printer carefully prints a 5x7 of, and dutifully
sends it along with the rest! g
keith whaley
DagT wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2491774size=lg
Comments are welcome :-)
DagT
Gianfranco, the DA 16-45 is a fine lens. I have tested it formally against the
excellent FA 20-35. It is definitely in that class, and perhaps just a bit sharper
than the 20-35. I have used the FA 24-90 but have not formally tested it. My
impression is that the DA 16-45 is in the same class as
Leaf, PhaseOne and Megavision all make 35 mm sized sensor backs at 6 and
11 MP. It may not make sense but its obviously marketable to pros for a
considerable price. Of course these also make bigger sensors, but the
biggest I found was about 45 x 45 mm, giving about 16 MP.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is the ***L supposed to stand for?
keith whaley
Steve Desjardins wrote:
OK. I just crop it down to 100k or so.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/02/04 11:21AM
Fight automation every inch of the way, you mean?
As for your eyes, I can see that AF is a great crutch. But crutches get in the
way when you don't need them. All automation I have used was fine as long as
you don't have to work around it. Once you do have to work around it, I feel it
is more
What he said. ;-) I'm a lazy typist, and take any shortcut I can.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/02/04 12:03PM
on 02.07.04 17:58, Keith Whaley at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the ***L supposed to stand for?
*** means best quality (lowest compression) JPEG, L stands for Large
- max
pixel size -
These lens (DA ones) are really only usable on the IST-D right?
Or are these like some Sigma/Tamron, optimized for digital but you can still
use them for 24x36 ?
I just hope Pentax will make Fas with the new focus mechanism of the DAs
Thanks
Thibouille
I think it is important to remember that, AF or MF, it's still an SLR.
If you use AF and everything you want looks nice and sharp, then you
won't do better with MF. I use MF for since I like to do macro, and
like the MF feel of the A lenses. (I'm actually going to get the A50
2.8 macro as a
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Thibs wrote:
These lens (DA ones) are really only usable on the IST-D right?
Or are these like some Sigma/Tamron, optimized for digital but you can still
use them for 24x36 ?
I just hope Pentax will make Fas with the new focus mechanism of the DAs
DA lenses have a reduced
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Steve Desjardins wrote:
I think it is important to remember that, AF or MF, it's still an SLR.
If you use AF and everything you want looks nice and sharp, then you
won't do better with MF. I use MF for since I like to do macro, and
like the MF feel of the A lenses. (I'm
Perhaps you would?
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
- Original Message -
From: Frantisek Vlcek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: John C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 1:55 AM
Subject: Re: What's the best zoom(s)
Usually, yes - but IMO my old 4.5/80-200 SMC Pentax-M was better than my
4.0/200 SMC Pentax-M.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
- Original Message -
From: John C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday,
I would have thought - with the vast experience you have - that you would
have noticed the characteristic peculiar to zoom lenses: when zooming the
angle of view changes and with it the area measured by TTL exposure meter
also changes and if the area measured is not uniformly lit or uniform in
I didn't realize that. Great. I've resisted up until now . . . ;-)
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/02/04 12:48PM
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Steve Desjardins wrote:
The 43 is widely known to be soft wide-open
-That Guy
-Original Message-
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Opinions wanted: 16-45 vs. 20-35 vs. 24-90
Interestingly - according to these tests FA*
Of course! Isn't it always that way? Once you hear the answer, you feel
stupid!
I've been seeing that in the camera specs (my S4, for instance) for some
time now, but when I saw it in conversation I didn't retrieve the memory.
As tho' that's something new with me... hah. :-P
Thanks, keith
Hi!
DZ The kinds of flowers in our yard have been pretty well covered with
DZ excellent pictures posted to the list. I haven't seen a bleeding heart,
DZ so I'll post this one
DZ http://www.radix.net/~drzz/paw/bheart.html
Sorry I am late. But I still want to take care of all of my PAW
backlog.
Hi!
FW Here is one I made at the Zandvoort beach in the Netherlands last Thursday,
ascensionday.
FW http://www.wuthrich.cc/albums/Zandvoort/imgp0677.jpg
FW *ist D and the 24-90mm lens. My feet in the cold water. I had
FW to crop it a bit to get the horizon level.
FW Finding Nemo:
FW
Dan,
My favorite shot of this batch is the third one, with the rocks in the
river prominent and the bridge in the far backgorund. My parents used to
take me to Quechee Gorge when I was a kid. I never hiked down into the
gorge, but I'd hang over the bridge. I once took a photo of the gorge
looking
Hi!
SB It was the summer of 1968, and I was living in a small apartment in San
SB Francisco. Across the panhandle, on Cole Street , lived Dick and Kathy,
SB the Haight-Ashbury's most middle class couple. I'd just gotten my
SB Spotmatic ... my very first real camera. I'd had it for but a week
Hi!
ft My last PAW before GFM:
ft http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2391935
ft I'd be especially interested to hear your thoughts, as I'm not sure about
ft this one. Sometimes I like it, due to the geometry and proportions of it.
ft Others, I hate it (hate's a strong word; dislike?)
Hi!
G Was at a Blue-Angels air show this weekend. Saw this toddler completely
G pooped out from the heat and the long wait for the final show. She was
G not the only one! Whew, it was hot.
G http://home.austin.rr.com/randj/pics/imgp1638.jpg
G Comments, suggestions, all welcome.
I have only
I remember they had the notice saying water damaged cameras won't be
repaired when I was in their Vancouver office.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
No they still support the Z-1p here in Canada, they
just said that it was water damaged and although there
is only visible damage on the one
Hi!
G Here is one of the shots I got of the planes in a daredevil formation:
G http://home.austin.rr.com/randj/pics/imgp1693.jpg
Oh, you lucky son of a gun g... Great, just great. Hope all of them
landed in one piece...
Makes me dizzy just looking at it...
Thumbs up.
Boris
Hi!
DN Got to witness something that I always think of as quite special - a
DN mantid ovipositing (that means laying eggs... and an ootheca is an egg-case)
DN Like many insects, these things generally exist in the winter only in
DN the form of eggs tucked away somewhere safe - at this time of
Konica copiers are good. :-)
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
We tend to judge everything by camera products. Canon is so big to a good
extent because of everything else they make, like copiers. Pentax might be
a perfectly successful company and make almost nothing with cameras.
Does
Thanks for your comments, Amita.
Years ago, I tried the straight down shot as well, but my attempts
gave no feel for how far down it is. In fact, I was shocked to read
that it is only 163 feet from the bridge to the river; It always felt a
lot higher, standing on the bridge.
Yes, it was a
Shel:
This is actually one of my favorite pictures from Dario Bonazza's
Vintage Spotmatic page. ( http://www.aohc.it/picte.htm ). Actually, I
think I like the other photo of the same two people in a more animated
pose even better. Good to see your standards were as high 35 years ago
as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
G Was at a Blue-Angels air show this weekend. Saw this toddler completely
G pooped out from the heat and the long wait for the final show. She was
G not the only one! Whew, it was hot.
G http://home.austin.rr.com/randj/pics/imgp1638.jpg
G Comments, suggestions, all
I could see that if I was asking for a warrenty
repair but this was me paying for it, either way it
doesn't matter know, I just have to order the part or
find a parts camera, I was just checking here for
someone with a parts camera before looking elsewhere.
--- Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
haven't seen that movie, please let me know if you remember that title.
maybe it would be better to set your camera to delay and take a picture of
yourself saving the man? ;-)
Rebekah
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 02,
When I went to Dartmouth, across the
Connecticutt River from Quechee, it was all male, which made the
isolation more intense.
Interesting. My mother went to Colby Sawyer College, an all-female
school. She tells me they used to bus the girls over to Dartmouth to
socialize with the guys.
Rob Studdert stopped shooting portraits of bugs long enough to write:
I would estimate that I've employed AF for less than 2% of the images I've
made with the *ist D and then only using the central focus spot. I find AF
sucks generally (and I do own a few fast AF lenses).
So what percentage of
Hi Steve.
If you connect a flash to the camera, ie, the AF400T and plug it into the X socket on
the
side of the
body,you can set the shutter speed dial to X (for 1/30 sync speed) or ,any speed slower
than 1/60.
If you find a 90 f2.8 LS lens the flash will sync from the shutter release on the
Ah, yes. I remember what we used to call Colby Junior College very
well. It was the closest women's school to Hanover, except for a small
nursing school in town. It was quite small, and difficult to get to and
from there in the winter, but there was quuite a bit of visiting back
and forth.
Last of the dogs and their people series for now,
anyway. I don't know why, but I think this one's
funny:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2492691
Agree or not, I always like to hear your comments. I
was shooting a bike race yesterday; the Ontario
Criterium Championships here in
--- Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi!
Lettin' ya know ...
Shame on me - I am still before GFM in my time
line...
Frank, this is very good urban shot. The funny thing
is that when I
tried to resize my IE window so as to crop off the
people on the left,
it stopped working.
--- DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2491774size=lg
Comments are welcome :-)
DagT
Dag,
Another amazing photo!! This totally rocks. I mean,
what's not to like? I like bikes; here's a bike. I
like bridges; here's a bridge. I like interesting
--- Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quechee Gorge is one of my favorite places. Located
in central Vermont
(USA), near the New Hampshire border, it is where US
4 crosses the
Ottauquechee River, 163 feet (54 meters) below. The
highway bridge was
originally a railroad bridge,
--- Tom Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ---
Well since we're getting well off topic
My Honda does 140mph and 38mpg BUT, not at the same
time!! I love it almost as much as my cameras...
Peace and love, Tom
My Rossin Pista does 30 mph - 40 down a hill, but gets
phenomenal mileage.
If you want to take a photo of the SR 71 in great lighting conditions
you can always go to the display
area just outside of Edwards AFB in California. In the middle of the
desert on a concrete slab open
to the elements, (read blazing sun), a pair of Blackbirds, just sitting
there...
If I can
My friend, singer and actress Loene Carmen has put up her website. A few
of my pics are in the gallery section (invariably taken with either the
FA50/1.4 or the FA*85/1.4
http://www.loenecarmen.com/
D
On 3 Jul 2004 at 1:58, Frantisek Vlcek wrote:
I think it does. But who ever would like to shoot 144 frames at 3 fps?
In sport situations (where this might be helpful), 3 fps is way too slow,
and the AF of D70 can't keep up with sport anyway (I am using this
camera BTW, along with, time to
Same here. Maybe closer to 90%. Of course, it is 0% when I use my K2 g.
Lewis
which for me turns out to be 80%+ AF.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: What % AF? (was Af speed of the *ist
Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Giafranco,
Hi Sylwek,
I don't have DA 16-45/4 yet, but you could be interested in
this link (just
use translator like babelfish):
http://www.pictchallenge.com/BxuREV7.html
Thanks!! I was looking for something of that kind too. And I'm
even able
--- Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: G'day
Cotty, Jens, Shel, rg, Tom, Peter, Boris
Thanks for the comments - much appreciated.
snip
Brian,
Having recently changed e-mails, I've got some posts
that I can't reply to back on Hotmail (including your
PAW), along with lots of comments re:
jtainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gianfranco, the DA 16-45 is a fine lens. I have tested it
formally against the excellent FA 20-35. It is definitely in
that class, and perhaps just a bit sharper than the 20-35. I
have used the FA 24-90 but have not formally tested it. My
impression is that the DA 16-45
Alan commented:
I guess it matters to Pentax because the potential problems are unknown for
water damaged products. They might end up paying more than they like if
anything went wrong with with the repair. The time required to troubleshoot
might be too long as well.
in response to:
I
--- Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Smithsonian institution opened a new museum near
Dulles Airport in Virginia in December last year.
My new employer (without naming names, it's the
largest online company in America) had an All
hands meeting there last night. We basically had
the
Yes Malcolm, I have. I intend to donate a collection of slides, negatives
and memorabilia taken or collected in the 1960's onwards to an institute set
up to maintain an historical archive of the location, and I have given them
free and clear copyright in my will. As regards your own purchases, I
Jens Bladt wrote:
snip
One of my favorites, Kieth Jarrett will be
attending the festival next
Friday! Guess this one is sold out already.
Cheers
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
Keith Jarrett? KEITH FREAKING JARRETT???
Damn, I love that
--- Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
snipI wonder what other
people see.
Upward, definitely.
keith
I'm in the up camp. It's not just his body
language, it's the flow of the photo. The railing
and the stairway seem to naturally start at the bottom
and
Gonz wrote:
Since there have been several People + Dog PAWs
recently, I thought
I would add to the chorus.
http://home.austin.rr.com/randj/pics/imgp1529web.jpg
Here is another one from the same set, but the
darn background messed
up what would have been a very cool pic with
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paw/shedrow.jpg
Its not uncommon,if you don't own your own
trailer,to spend many hours at a horse show
than you
need to.
This family was up at 4am to ready their horse,and
This lot might not be too interesting to bargain hunters but next weeks load
may be... stay tuned.
http://cgi6.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewSellersOtherItemsuserid=distudio
Cheers,
Rob Studdert (eBay ID: distudio)
http://members.ebay.com.au/aboutme/distudio/
PO Box 701
HURSTVILLE BC NSW
--- Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This
lot might not be too interesting to bargain
hunters but next weeks load
may be... stay tuned.
http://cgi6.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewSellersOtherItemsuserid=distudio
Cheers,
Rob Studdert (eBay ID: distudio)
I am selling a top quality macro lenses/bellows setup
on ebay this week:
http://jcoconnell.com/JCO_AUCT.HTM
It's M42 but can easily be adapted to nearly any 35mm SLR/DSLR.
Later,
JCO
J.C. O'Connell mailto:[EMAIL
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mostly drivel, as usual
PS: Just went back and looked again, and I noticed
the crap on boots of the young lady on the right.
Nice touch. I know you didn't put it there or
anything, Dave, but it's just one of those details
that reminds us that
--- David Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day,
Haven't posted a PAW for a while, so here's a PESO,
just wondering what
people think. I'm sort of in two minds about the
image, but it's the
result of a little project, thought posting it was
better than nothing
at all.
So, without
Frantisek Vlcek wrote:
LA True, but only in jpeg format. Do you know if when running at 3 fps
LA the D70 will refocus and recalculate exposure between each shot? If
I think it does. But who ever would like to shoot 144 frames at 3 fps?
The same person who'd want to shoot 100ft of 35mm at
I must have missed the original post for this. This is a wonderful image.
My offbeat comment is why should fungiphiles be embarrassed, we are looking
at the creatures sex organ.
frank theriault wrote:
--- David Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day,
Haven't posted a PAW for a while, so
I must say this is the kind of photo we expect from Frank Theriault in
his own inimitable style.
Just looking at it makes me smile as well.
frank theriault wrote:
Last of the dogs and their people series for now,
anyway. I don't know why, but I think this one's
funny:
Hi Dave,
Glad Frank commented on this pic. It's got a lot going for it, but it also
has some problems. No comment on the value of the gate and post in the
foreground. I don't think I like it from a compositional point of view, yet
iIdo think it adds an element that contributes to the feel and
Hi!
ein OK, after some time defending myself on the rich suburban mom thing
ein (mosty pointing out that it was uttered in the gear/skill/results context
ein not the pro/amateur/uses context) I figured I'd actually address the
ein pro/amateur/uses thing by refering to a concept I bumped into in
Hi!
DM This week's image is from the beach.
DM http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/cgi-bin/paw.cgi?date=22-May-2004
Dave, this is fantastic. I am very square at times g so I'd like to
point out that three bright specks on the right above and on the side
of the shell could be edited out.
Otherwise,
Hi
GA http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2351011size=lg
GA An ordinary scan of a picture taken just when I was getting interested
GA in photography and had bought a camera from rec.photo.35mm.equipment.
GA Scanned from a 4x6 print at 200 dpi. Comments on composition, lighting
GA welcome
Hi!
SK http://makeashorterlink.com/?O10332668
SK If this doesn't work try:
SK http://www.bluehorizon3d.com/cgi-bin/IB3/ikonboard.cgi?s=af7ea03d84fdfa9ba39
SK 369a476bba910;act=ST;f=9;t=4;r=1
SK Let me know what you think!
I should say I really like this one. Very geometric with nice bokeh. I
Hi!
DJM Thanks Boris!
DJM I wish I could try again. The dog is long gone, and the boy is 31. At
DJM the age show in the photo, it was rare to get one to slow down long
DJM enough to get a photo, let alone both. They were sitting down looking
DJM very nice, but when I grabbed the camera, they
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 22:27:30 -0400 (EDT), frank theriault wrote:
--- Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This
lot might not be too interesting to bargain
hunters but next weeks load
may be... stay tuned.
http://cgi6.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewSellersOtherItemsuserid=distudio
Would
- Original Message -
From: Raimo K
Subject: Re: What's the best zoom(s) for M42?
Usually, yes - but IMO my old 4.5/80-200 SMC Pentax-M was better
than my
4.0/200 SMC Pentax-M.
I wonder what the deal was at the time with their 200mm f/4 lenses?
I have the M200 f/4 and quite right, it
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
