Thanks, Don.
This focal length is great for sports, street events, theatre and concerts
etc.
It's a very good lens - but slow (4-5.6) - if you can live with the small
aperture it's a brilliant choise. I paid almost 300 USD for mine 5 yeras ago
in near mint condition, which was considered cheep. I
My allergies are acting up.
Jim A.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 22:18:22 -0600
To: Pentax Discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PAW
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 00:18:24 -0400
Rip it apart...
Teleconverters are about weight and bulk, not about cost.
If you travel through Africa on a motorbike to take photograps, it's a good
idea to carry some nice 2.8 high quality lenses along with a teleconverter.
Then you can leave maybe 2 or 3 heavy lenses at home. But using the
converter with a
I was about to pick up some photo CDs from my one hour lab and found out
that their machine broke down. I asked to look at my negs and they looked a
bit dusty. A question for anyone who's worked in a minilab- does the typical
machine (Kodak Express) used to scan negs to transfer them to CD have
I've been refused entry to Israel due to my fanily's connection with Meyer
Lansky.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I almost wish to challenge you to come to Israel and try your magic
here. At least I would get to meet you in person g...
big friendly grin
Hi, Bill.
On composition, I'd say that the tree is damn well placed. It breaks the
horizontal lines nicely. The top of the tree is exactly enough into the sky
area, and the trunk is rooted well in the foreground. To my taste, the
composition becomes even tighter if you take away enough of the
It's a nice story, but it has absolutely no basis in fact.
(For a start, the English brandish two fingers, not just one.)
The business about cutting off bow fingers as the origin of the
English flicking a V seems to be quite well attested. I have seen
it mentioned by professional
A latent photographer trying to break free of the bindings of an eBay existence
maybe or a frustrated ex-govt employee? In any case it's the weirdest eBay ad
I've come across for a while :-)
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=4688item=3825994568
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE
Hi Tom,
I've always used a very soft brush to remove dust from my lenses. The
thing is, dust is all there ever is as I always have a filter on all of
my lenses except for occasional studio shots.
I guess it was something I heard/learnt when I started, but it means
that all I ever have to clean
On Jul 6, 2004, at 1:31 AM, William Robb wrote:
One thing to note, the shutter speed dial is quite easy to knock off
it's setting if you have the speed adaptor ring mounted (I think it
only came with the meter prism though).
Check you shutter speeds frequently if you are using the speed ring.
And
On Jul 6, 2004, at 2:00 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Based on some bad past experiences with cameras, kinda makes
you wonder why all cameras with rotating shutter speed dials
didn't have a lock on them, at least a lock for the X position
at a minimum.
Many cameras had a lock on the Auto setting.
That's the former gooeyduck who appears to have got somebody else to do
all the things that were annoying to him. Seems to deal mostly in
less-than-mint stuff. I bought a spotmeter from him once, a bit dinged but
worked fine.
Paul Ewins
Melbourne, Australia
-Original Message-
From: Rob
On Jul 6, 2004, at 4:30 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
DM http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/cgi-bin/paw.cgi?date=13-Jun-2004
I'd rather you pointed your camera a little down to show us more of
the river and less of clouds... You know, river would lead into the
shot, so to say.
It's not a river, it's the
For those on the list who beleive windows is safe:
Hackers sent a chill across the Web last week when they engineered a
way to take over Microsoft-designed Web servers [IIS] to spread a virus
onto Windows PCs. The virus was planted on Windows computers when they
visited Web sites that had been
Thankas for the info.
What is ISS?
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 6. juli 2004 11:17
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: OT: Windows Scob virus collects passwords, financial data;
Typical Marv Olsen. I've met such style for years. I bought from him (Marv
aka Gooeyduck) or her (Pat) a few times, with good satisfaction.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 9:13 AM
Subject: OT Strange eBay
No idea.
Antonio
On 6 Jul 2004, at 11:21, Jens Bladt wrote:
Thankas for the info.
What is ISS?
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 6. juli 2004 11:17
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: OT:
IIS is an 'Internet Information Server' - a web server running microsoft software to
host the websites.
-Original Message-
From: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 July 2004 10:22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SV: Windows Scob virus collects passwords, financial
data;
I'm still amazed by the excellent capability of getting low light pictures
with the *ist D, so this picture was only meant to show that. No supposed
art in it, not at all.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday,
Yes, I realized that after posting my message. However, from the technical
point of view I truly wasn't completely pleased with the result, so I had to
point out that.
Judging it as a picture (the reason for PAW), it can be appreciable. Now I
like it better than right after shooting it.
Thanks
On 6 Jul 2004 at 11:21, Jens Bladt wrote:
Thankas for the info.
What is ISS?
Microsofts integrated Internet Information Services servers, web, ftp etc for
NT
http://www.microsoft.com/iis
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think that any lens cleaning fluid which contains surface
detensioning agents (surfactants) is to be avoided. In plain speech,
that's your typical dishwasher agent, and such concotions using it in
cleaner form sold for higher prices.
Why?
Because surfactants are notorious for sticking on any
The Russian web server at the centre of a serious net security problem
has been shut down.
From the BBC:
When visited by unwitting web users the server exploited loopholes in
Microsoft's Internet Explorer and opened a backdoor into compromised
PCs.
When first discovered, the security problem
Teleconverters are about weight and bulk, not about cost.
If you travel through Africa on a motorbike to take photograps, it's
a good idea to carry some nice 2.8 high quality lenses along with a
teleconverter.
I couldn't agree more, (especially being a motorcyclist myself) maybe a 80-
200
Hard not to have focus with a 19mm lens.
Frank shoulda shook the camera a bit to
get the classic FT look. Wink.
David Nelson wrote:
Wow frank, these seem to be in focus! q-:
I like the stop sign one too.
I don't know what the exact ingredients are but Kodak Len Fluid smells like
ammonia while some unknown lens fluid (those I used many many yrs ago)
smells like alcohol.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I think that any lens cleaning fluid which contains surface
detensioning agents
Thanks Frank. I appreciate the comments. I agree that the bread appears
underexposed. That was my intention, but it may have been a poor
choice. I can easily change that and perhaps I will. Again, thanks for
the feedback.
Paul
On Jul 5, 2004, at 10:57 PM, frank theriault wrote:
--- Paul
Hi!
I've been refused entry to Israel due to my fanily's connection with
Meyer Lansky.
Shel, please contact me off-list. I need an explanation.
Thanks.
Boris
I thought it would indicate Stirling (silver), as the lady is not in her teens anymore
and has silver hair.
On Monday 05 July 2004 22:05, Keith Whaley wrote:
FJW
FJW John Forbes wrote:
FJW
FJW Stirling is a fine old burgh in Scotland. No doubt there was/is a Lord
FJW Stirling, and Lady
William Robb sought punishment for past sins by writing:
Rip it apart...
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/paw/IMGP3990.jpg;
I think the shot works. One lonely small stand of trees in a vast empty
space. The shape of the trees does make me want to move them to the right
side of the frame so
Simon King wrote:
I thought everyone had a UV or Skylight on when venturing outside, and only
took them off to put on another filter.
I don't usually use those filters anymore. Someone a while back asked why
would you spend $$$ on a top quality lens and then take pictures through a
$10 piece of
Thanks Boris,
Actually I spend enough time on the KMP site that I've downloaded a local
copy to my machine to make it faster to browse.
I also look at the Pentax Lenses Review site quite often:
http://home.att.net/~alnem/html/pentax_zooms.html
They don't mention the Takumar F 4-5.6/70-210 but do
Sorry Frank.I read your comments but neglected to reply.
Thanks for the nice comments and boost.
Dave
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Ann. I needed that today.:-)
Dave
On 6/7/04, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, offered:
Canon advertises on TV:
Canon 300D: Digital photography - not just for professionals.
Brilliant slogan isn't it?
Pentax might consider something like:
Pentax *ist D: The beauty of advanced, digital photography - small, light
and elegant.
Jens
F:
First generation of AF lenses from Pentax. Design is usually gray and with a
plasticky look to them.
FA:
Second, and still current, generation. Designed in either silvery grey or
black.
FAJ:
Introduced with the *istD. Lacks the traditional aperture ring. Aperture must be
selected from
On 6 Jul 2004 at 7:02, Don Sanderson wrote:
Does anyone know if there is a clear cut distinction between these different
Pentax AF lens designations, or perhaps a site that lists the differences? Also
what is the difference between SMC and SMCP?
Search and you will find:
Pentax Digital...Smaller than the rest.
Pentax...The official camera of the digitally undersized.
Pentax...When you want a camera that costs a bit more.
Pentax...Our lenses are quirky.
Pentax...you can use ALL* of your old lenses.
*mostly
Pentax...Got AAs?
Cory
feeling silly this morning
Hi Don
I'm not even close to being an expert.
But I guess SMC and SMCP is the same (Super Multi Coated - SMC and Pentax)
are registered trad marks.
Take a good look at this site:
http://www.bdimitrov.de/
It's Bojidar Dimitrov's Homepage eksplaining a lot of Pentax related stuff.
Cheers
Jens
Ryan,
Some interesting photos there. I like the human interest type the
bestthe ones with a lone knight putting on his armor...
The overpowering inevitability of modern life in the background is a bummer
though. Next time they should hold the event in the woods somewhere.
Cory
-
Mark Roberts:
There are plenty of (poorly designed) web sites that won't work if you
have scripting (JavaScript) turned off, but I can't remember ever
finding one that wouldn't work because I had Active-X turned off.
Some webmail systems.
anders
-
http://anders.hultman.nu/
Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't myrrh a burial spice?
Well according to Monty Python's Life of Brian (my standard reference
for information on Christianity) it's an ointment.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
SMCP indicates a Pentax lens, and therefore a K mount, whilst SMCT
indicates a Takumar, and therefore a screw mount. Although there are some
K mount Takumars, they don't have SMC, so can't be called SMCT.
John
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 15:04:31 +0200, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Don
For most of my life I assumed that this was the typical phallic gesture.
I saw the Long Bow version on one of those little pre-commercial
snippets on the History Channel. Even they claimed it had no proven
basis in fact. If, however, there was an English gesture that made a V,
maybe this was a
Pentax K mount lenses are (as far as I recall by heart):
Older manual K-mount lenses are SMC:
K (or no letter) made for K1000, K2, KX etc
M are made for MX, ME, Me Super, LX etc.
M* are compact and light lenses (that's what it says in the small books,
that came with the lenses)
A have
Cotty wrote:
During the recent Wimbledon Tennis Championship, Venus and Serena
Williams' father was often seen in close-up on TV using what looked like
a 300D. I'll bet that was given to him.
Probably a sneaky way of inserting more advertising into the telecast.
Wasn't Canon buying
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
During the recent Wimbledon Tennis Championship, Venus and Serena
Williams' father was often seen in close-up on TV using what looked like
a 300D. I'll bet that was given to him.
Canon: People will use our cameras if we give 'em away free.
;-)
--
Mark
I think you've hit the nail on the head with regard to the advertising
slogan.
John
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 09:34:25 -0400, Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cotty wrote:
During the recent Wimbledon Tennis Championship, Venus and Serena
Williams' father was often seen in close-up on TV using what
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 13:03:51 +0200, Frits Wüthrich
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I thought it would indicate Stirling (silver), as the lady
is not in
her
teens anymore and has silver hair.
Yes! That's what I was meant, even though the spelling of sterling on
the boat was the wrong one.
Many web-based applications like web publication solutions, document management
systems, etc. Typical office applications.
But note that Javascript and ActiveX are different technologies entirely. You
can deactivate ActiveX and still be able to run javascripts.
Jostein
Quoting Anders Hultman
Jostein,
I think the arrogance and abuse (yet again) is all yours. Not to
mention the flames. All I did was pass on the information.
Cmon Jostein, any other product would be pulled from the market on
safety grounds by now, not to mention trade descriptions/not fit for
the purpose for which it
There are two V-signs.
The normal one, indicating disrespect (to put it mildly) is made with the
back of the hand facing away from the gesturer.
The Churchillian one, indicating victory, is made with the back of the
hand facing towards the gesturer.
Of course, if Churchill were making the
The fisheye affect of the A16/2.8 on the *ist D is somewhat
diminished, it
just looks like an ultra-wide with really bad barrel
distortion, I suspect the
Zenitar would deliver a similar image.
Thanks, Rob. I figured as much. I went ahead and bought it. It'll give
me a reason to use my
Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many web-based applications like web publication solutions, document management
systems, etc. Typical office applications.
But note that Javascript and ActiveX are different technologies entirely. You
can deactivate ActiveX and still be able to run javascripts.
A 2.8/300mm Pentax cost app. a months salery here
- I could buy a nice, used car for that! I have the SMC M* 4/300mm -
it's actually excellent, but is lacking the AF of cource. Jens
That's the trouble I'm too sensible I'd probably go for the car option too. I
had a 300 f4 'K' for some time
This is truly a winner, Tom.
Or: We just love Pentax cameras so much, we want to keep them to our
selves.
(But if you insist, we could be persuaded to sell you one).
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Tom Reese [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi Cory,
Thanks for being the first to review them! I myself would be quite
hard-pressed to find a favourite photo or type, there was just so many
things to shoot! I'm relooking at what I put up, and flavour of the moment
is 00990023.jpg (an action shot), just because I don't usually shoot action
--- Paul Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not happy with lo-res scans on CDs and the labs want
an outrageous price for
hi-res scans. Thinking about getting a Pacific
Imaging 3650 Pro - Anyone
have any experience or insights into this?
From what I've read, the Pacific Image and SmartDisk
On 6 Jul 2004 at 9:52, Mark Roberts wrote:
Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many web-based applications like web publication solutions, document management
systems, etc. Typical office applications.
But note that Javascript and ActiveX are different technologies entirely. You
can
I can vouch for the Kiron. I think it is one of the best 100 mm macros ever
made both in lens quality and build quality. I'm not sure why anyone, accept
collectors or Pentax fanatics which we have plenty of here, would pay the
exhorbitant amount for the Pentax A 2.8 when they can get the Kiron
TG 15-30, there is no chance of using any filter on the front lens cover ring.
TG it vignettes noticeably until zoomed to at least the 20mm mark with just the
TG ring attached. not being able to use a filter is limiting, but not as
TG limiting as it could be.
With the 15-30, I found the ring
MR Well according to Monty Python's Life of Brian (my standard reference
MR for information on Christianity) it's an ointment.
But isn't it a dangerous animal ;-) ?
Best regards,
Frantisek Vlcek
Since Bill's son has moved to the area he is eligible for conditional
membership in the DCPDML. This calls for beer,
pizza and a vote.
Where - The Original Ledo's In College Park, MD
When - Sunday July 25th, 12:30
Let me know if you can come.
tv
Hi Steve,
PSCS works extremely well on my computer. It's every bit as fast as PS6
was. I'm running it on a Mac G4 dual processor 1.25. I have a 200 gig
firewire drive and the 70 gig drive that came with the computer. I keep
at least 5 gig free on the 70 gig drive and 30 gig on the firewire
While not familiar with the Pacific Imaging scanner, I've used a few others
before deciding on the Nikon. I'd pretty much agree with Mark wrt his
choices, although I think the Nikon does a somewhat better job than the
Minolta if you're looking for ultimate sharpness and work with
conventional BW
Please, antonio,
Quote my arrogant statements. And since you say again, please quote my
previous arrogant statements too, if you can. I'd like to learn from my
mistakes.
Jostein
Quoting Antonio Aparicio [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jostein,
I think the arrogance and abuse (yet again) is all yours.
http://www.njagyouth.org/Liberty_.htm
Grow up Jostein. Take your trolling elsewhere. I am not interested.
Antonio
On 6 Jul 2004, at 16:42, Jostein wrote:
Please, antonio,
Quote my arrogant statements. And since you say again, please quote
my
previous arrogant statements too, if you can. I'd like to learn from my
mistakes.
Jostein
Gang,
After a chat with a pentax guy today, I got the impression that the *istD
doesn't use much firmware antialiasing, but rely on a softening filter in front
of the CCD to avoid jagged edges. Does anyone have any other info on this?
Jostein
Quoting Antonio Aparicio [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Grow up Jostein. Take your trolling elsewhere. I am not interested.
Ahem.
Ok.
Sorry I bothered you.
Bring my greetings to your alter Apparitions, that Guy and El Gringo.
Humbled.
Jostein
Jens Bladt a écrit :
Pentax K mount lenses are (as far as I recall by heart):
Older manual K-mount lenses are SMC:
K (or no letter) made for K1000, K2, KX etc
M are made for MX, ME, Me Super, LX etc.
M* are compact and light lenses (that's what it says in the small books,
that came with the
Isnt this the way they (DSLRs) all work? Except the full frame Kodak
jobbie which has no AA filter (and has problems with moire etc as a
result I believe).
-Original Message-
From: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 July 2004 15:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: *istD
On 6 Jul 2004 at 16:53, Jostein wrote:
Gang,
After a chat with a pentax guy today, I got the impression that the *istD
doesn't use much firmware antialiasing, but rely on a softening filter in front
of the CCD to avoid jagged edges. Does anyone have any other info on this?
There is
Mark Roberts wrote:
When Frank Theriault stopped here on his way back to Toronto (from GFM),
he left us a package in incense. Some really nice Tibetan stuff. So last
night the SO and I were sitting on the patio having a glass of wine when
I suggested we burn some of the Frank incense. Which
Thanks guys, I figured it was fairly simple.
I've looked around Boz's site quite a bit and didn't find the F, FA, FAJ description.
Must have passed over it.
Figured SMCP was as you describe but I'm old enough to have learned that it's better
to look dumb than be ignorant!
Thanx Again
Don
From Kodak:
The DCS Pro 14n does not have an anti-aliasing filter. Consequently,
the DCS Pro 14n yields images that are sharper than most other digital
SLR cameras. The resolution of the Pro 14n is so high that aliasing
artifacts are generally not an issue for most applications.
And
No, the
I am in no way related to Antonio Apparicio... I also use a WINDOWS
computer, so that connection is lost.
el gringo
This'll be my last presentation, at least for quite some time.
For those who have cared to look, you may have seen one or another of these
photos before, but not in this presentation. I'm trying a somewhat new
approach to making a portrait, using more than one image to convey an
overall feeling
Thanks, Rob,
I too suspected most DSLR's except the Kodaks to be that way.
Not having seen how a 6 Mpix image would look without anti-aliasing, it makes me
wonder. Nikon has apparently implemented a middle way with D70, doing some of
the anti-aliasing in software instead.
Here's a quote from
It seems they are constantly looking for ways to use weaker AA filters
in order to improve sharpness. The trade-off is processing power/time.
Either you slow the image processing significantly by doing some of the
AA in firmware, or you only do the extra AA in the RAW conversion
software.
I
On 6/7/04, tom, discombobulated, offered:
Since Bill's son has moved to the area he is eligible for conditional
membership in the DCPDML. This calls for beer,
pizza and a vote.
Where - The Original Ledo's In College Park, MD
When - Sunday July 25th, 12:30
Let me know if you can come.
Yeah I
I'm not sure why anyone, accept collectors or Pentax fanatics
which we have plenty of here, would pay the exhorbitant amount for
the Pentax A 2.8 when they can get the Kiron for a fraction of the
price...
Perhaps, except that the A 100/2.8 Macro was not always so dear -
that is to say that
Hi!
aw I like the texture in this one a lot:
aw http://phred.org/~alex/pictures/hiking/noble-knob/reduced/IMGP3665.jpg
This is the best one. So I think at least. It has this abstract feel
and this wonderful color and sharpness. I really like all about it.
Well seen.
aw There are a lot of
Hi!
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 13:03:51 +0200, Frits Wüthrich
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I thought it would indicate Stirling (silver), as the lady
is not in
her
teens anymore and has silver hair.
AG Yes! That's what I was meant, even though the spelling of sterling on
AG the boat was the
I've never had a lens hood reduce my elements, and I don't think I
want it to - paid a lot for those elements.
Har!
Fred
I mean distance the lens is focused at, not focal length.
Joe
Joe Wilensky wrote:
I think FA lenses also transmit the distance the lens is focused
at, which can influence the multi segment metering in some
situations and also the smart program decision the cameras make
(at least for cameras
Pål Jensen wrote:
All optical design are about compromises. Particularly very small lenses.
The 43 Limited was designed in the old fashioned way without computer
(well, mostly) in order to get that pre computer look from the images the
lens produce. This explains the high distortion.
I may be
Hi,
Tuesday, July 6, 2004, 2:41:23 PM, John wrote:
There are two V-signs.
The normal one, indicating disrespect (to put it mildly) is made with the
back of the hand facing away from the gesturer.
The Churchillian one, indicating victory, is made with the back of the
hand facing towards
Yeah, I knew someone would say something like that. :)
Tom C.
From: Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 43 Limited
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 11:19:35 -0700
I've never had a lens hood reduce my elements, and I don't think I want it
to - paid a
Right. I can find no other M* than the 4/300mm in my little lens books.
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 6. juli 2004 20:31
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: SMC lenses
M* are
True.
John
John Whittingham
Technician
-- Original Message ---
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 21:02:00 +0200
Subject: RE: SMC lenses
Right. I can find no other M* than the 4/300mm in my little lens books.
Jens
Jens Bladt
That's a very unique effect, Shel, and a very beautiful set of photos.
I'd be very interested to see the same principle applied to an adult
subject. I like the way the last photo answers the how did you do that?
question, too...
Don't stop :-)
S
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
The first and last shots are fantastic IMO. It's all a touch pretentious
though... The whole drama of This'll be my last 'presentation', etc. I'd
prefer an interpretive title as well, rather than the pretentious title it
has, the title doesn't really identify me with him. Why five minutes??
I have noticed some disturbing... to me, anomalies in metering on the *ist
D. I have not take the time to analyze my results. What I've noticed is
somewhat different from your experience. WHat I describe occurred while in
matrix metering.
1. On one series of shots I bracketed using the EV
Also this info is used by Z1/Z1-p for Power Zoom functions, like the zoom
clip mode and image size track mode.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Henri Toivonen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 6. juli 2004 20:31
Til: [EMAIL
In case this didn't go through... many others have since...
Very nice picture Bill. What magazine did you say you found this in? ;)
I love the sky, muted color pallette, and division of elements in the frame.
It has a real sense of isolation and strangely makes me feel as if I'm
there myself.
Thanks for that Bob. The newsreels were before my time!
John
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 19:44:34 +0100, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Tuesday, July 6, 2004, 2:41:23 PM, John wrote:
There are two V-signs.
The normal one, indicating disrespect (to put it mildly) is made with
the
back of the hand
I remember reading about a newspaper that removed and threw away the lens
caps before issuing new cameras to its team. However, that was before
SLRs, and it was all too easy to take a wonderful shot with the lens cap
firmly in situ.
John
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 19:36:23 +0100, Bob W [EMAIL
Lots o very nice shots - and some really great ones as well. Looks like you
all had a very nice day to remember.
The downside of it all is the hard work after the shots are taken, isn't it
:-) I'm still working on shots I took the last week of April!
All the best
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL
Tom wrote:
So how images from a particular lens can have a pre-computer look versus
an 'absence of computer look' is simply beyond me. An how that can be
blanketly stated, considering all the variables that will go into producing
an image, is even more beyond me.
Computers are used in
I like it, slammed my head into the monitor trying to get into the scene
Norm
William Robb wrote:
Rip it apart...
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/paw/IMGP3990.jpg
William Robb
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
