On 3/9/04, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
The WinderMX shoots at 2 fps. The Motor Drive MX, which is much much
more expensive, and I believe requires an external battery pack,
shoots at 5 fps. I always thought that spoke to the ruggedness of the
fully mechanical shutter on what
Also Ansmann Energy 8 (or 16) - very very good, but they aint cheap!
Most of the uniross range seems to be switched over to individual cell
chargers now too.
Actually most if not all manufacturers are switching to individual cell
monitoring these days, although they may not have a light on each
Kostas,
No problem. That 28/3.5 was very expensive, but some other uncommon lenses
listed there seemed to be reasonable. I pay 15% tax to import a lens into
Canada, but no duty. Some shippers (notably UPS) charge relatively high
'handling fees', but most do not. Do you have to pay both tax
Ryan Lee wrote:
PS. So what was the collective noun for ist D's again?
The nouveau-poor? ;-)
S
frank theriault wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2663940
Very nice.
I hope you told the Nikon boys that a boat and a 50mm lens would afford a
good shot from underneath :-)
Malcolm
Long live Esperanto!!
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: Michel Carrère-Gée [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Re: Francophones
Votre français est bien meilleur que l'anglais que j'écris avec parfois
l'aide de Babelfish.
The dMax of my scanner convinced me to shoot negative film
always. I haven't scanned a shot yet where detail wasn't
retained nicely, provided I do my part when I expose the
negative in-camera.
-Lon
Shel Belinkoff wrote, in part:
snip..
However, I'd really like to see a well designed consumer
http://www3.telus.net/wlachan/Z1p-eyepiece1.jpg
http://www3.telus.net/wlachan/Z1p-eyepiece2.jpg
http://www3.telus.net/wlachan/Z1p-inside.jpg
1 of the 2 coated elements might got loosen. You can try to clip them in
place. If they were broken, just buy the eyepiece assembly from Pentax and
replace
I prefer to shoot negative for the same reason. I use a very old Minolta
Scan Elite btw.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
The dMax of my scanner convinced me to shoot negative film
always. I haven't scanned a shot yet where detail wasn't
retained nicely, provided I do my part when I
I do not recommend to mess with the finder either. Better to remove the
little left side body cover instead.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I would not recommend to do that. The left hand top cover is one of the few
parts on the LX that are easy to remove ;-) and once you have that off
I forgot to mention, the hot shoe cover must be removed or the top won't
come off.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
http://www3.telus.net/wlachan/Z1p-eyepiece1.jpg
http://www3.telus.net/wlachan/Z1p-eyepiece2.jpg
http://www3.telus.net/wlachan/Z1p-inside.jpg
1 of the 2 coated elements might
Upon taking a bunch of rather soft shots, I've just been testing my ist D's
AF. It seems that with the Sigma EX 28-70 2.8 (which I've not had any AF
problems with my 5n), even though the camera says something is focus (using
single point/ spot AF), the camera consistently misses the focus (tested
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Jim Colwell wrote:
No problem. That 28/3.5 was very expensive, but some other uncommon lenses
listed there seemed to be reasonable. I pay 15% tax to import a lens into
Canada, but no duty. Some shippers (notably UPS) charge relatively high
'handling fees', but most do
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:55:28 +0100 (BST), Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004, James wrote:
I have an MZ-60. it refuses to talk to my A lenses. only FA lenses with apture ring
set to A will work.
No, A lenses and F lenses with the aperture ring set to A will work
too.
You tell
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:28:23 -0400 (EDT), John Francis wrote:
That shouldn't be necessary. In fact with an A lens it
won't do anything useful, and can only cause problems.
Take the tape off, and try wiggling the lens around a bit.
Sometimes the A contact is intermittent, and only works
if you
Everything over $30 I get sent to the UK I pay tax and customs on, that's the
whole amount including postage not just the amount over $30. If Parcel Force
get to deliver it they add their own charge as well!!! handling fee of about
£8 ($15 US approx)
rip-off Britain.
John
-- Original
http://www.photo.net/gc/view-one?classified_ad_id=586508
(not mine)
Sincerely,
C. Brendemuehl
-
'Every one of us is, even from his mother's womb, a master craftsman of idols.'
-- John Calvin (1509-64)
___
Join
Just use the same lenses to test another *istD in the shop and see.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Upon taking a bunch of rather soft shots, I've just been testing my ist D's
AF. It seems that with the Sigma EX 28-70 2.8 (which I've not had any AF
problems with my 5n), even though the
Yes they do. My wife needed new glasses last week,
and picked up Nikon frames and lenses. We joked with the
optician about wanting Pentax SMC; she said Pentax made
lenses but such were not carried by her store.
frank theriault wrote, in part:
Does Pentax make eyeglass lenses? I know Nikon does,
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ilford just got really hard to get in Canada . The company no longer
is distributing product, so it all has to be imported from the
American distributor, who is not interested at all in dealing with
foreign sales.
My local guys just bought a whole truckload
Henri Toivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=15234item=3837594505rd=1
Check it out. Features:
Color Viewfinder
Deluxe Electronic Flash
Aerodynamic Design
I bet its even tested in a windtunnel! vbg
I think this camera also has the legendary Bokeh
I apologise in advance for the length of this. I hope it's still
coherent as it's getting rather late...
On Sep 3, 2004, at 2:02 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
Using the PS CS import utility the option exist to select one of four
CS profiles in my system. The available profiles are Adobe RGB (1998),
Locally, Cord camera has a Tamron Adaptall2 90/2.5. I've no
interest in such, but if anyone else does... ... and if it
compares favorably to the others that are discussed regularly
I'll get the price for you.
If anyone is interested, he/she might want to know some details, to
distinguish
Gonz wrote:
Wanna buy a Chinon?
No thanks, Gonz. I don't go out of my way to buy third-party lenses. I buy them
when they offer something I specifically want. I suppose the Chinon 55/1.2K
would be interesting, but my next normal lens will be a Pentax 50/1.4 PKA.
The only Chinon I'd love to
The old one has metal contruction while the newer one has a more AF look.
Just don't forget the 1:1 extension tube.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
If anyone is interested, he/she might want to know some details, to
distinguish which model it actually is. I think there are at least
two
lol! I forgot I had a spare ist D lying around the house. I just did a quick
test, and it appears that I don't have to send my ist D back (damn! Because
the ist D is still under warranty while the lens isn't..). Anyway, I've
noticed that at 2.8, autofocusing on text doesn't emphasise the edges. I
Would be well worth testing on a film body too. It might just be the AF
system in the *istD which is often said to have such focussing
innacuracies with fast lenses (like the FA 50 1.4 for example). There
might be nothing wrong with the lens either...
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Lee
This one time, at band camp, Rob Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would be well worth testing on a film body too. It might just be the AF
system in the *istD which is often said to have such focussing
innacuracies with fast lenses (like the FA 50 1.4 for example). There
might be nothing
Yes Aaron whould be a good source to start with ,at least in this area anyway. I'll see
what he has to
say.
I had some scans done by Aaron a few years ago and they were good,but we just did
inkjet
prints.
Thanks for the import info Bill.
Shel,if i draw a blank up here and find i have a worthy
The problems relate to focussing on distant objects and shooting wide
open - this is not something which is called for, so normally goes
unnoticed until or unless tested specifically. Compare with manual
focus on a distant object and you will probably find that the AF has
focussed in front of the
Yep, it is. The North Carolina Forest Service owns that one. They bring it
around to air shows down here. Although they do not normally do demo drops
(usually there is no place where you could see it from the air show that would
not wind up getting the state sued), you can walk through it,
Yes they do. My wife needed new glasses last week,
and picked up Nikon frames and lenses. We joked with the
optician about wanting Pentax SMC; she said Pentax made
lenses but such were not carried by her store.
Just the same story as the Pentax camera gear, then.
:-(
Ryan posted:
lol! I forgot I had a spare ist D lying around the house. ...
Now THAT remark is truly obnoxious!
:-D
ERN
I always figured that the ones with worn out shutters had a motor drive on them
at one time. That and the idea they did not ever need a CLA. If you run a
highspeed motor drive on your camera you really should have it CLA'd every year
or two. And be sure to tell the technician about the drive so
I believe it was due to the fact that as the lens approach infinity
(especially for non-tele lenses), the subject and the amount of lens travel
are so small the system is unable to differentiate the difference. Just try
to manual focus and notice how the AF indicator behaves. The acceptable
Kevin, could you test something out if you're free- do both an auto and
manual focus (spot AF, at 1.4, without flash) of some reasonably close text
(e.g. a 50cm away shot of the word Microsoft on your mouse perhaps?) and see
if there's any difference? I've noticed over several shots that my AF
Some of the lists's favorite K-mount lenses are for sale in Russia at
http://www.ekta-f.ru/app/pentax.html
I can't figure out whether the posted prices are in Euros or what. Can one of
our Russian speakers tell us, and also tell us where the seller will ship to?
One third-party lens stands
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 11:08:21 +0100, Malcolm Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very nice.
I hope you told the Nikon boys that a boat and a 50mm lens would afford a
good shot from underneath :-)
Malcolm
Thanks, Malcolm! Glad you enjoyed it.
Your comment about the Nikon boys got me to
I probably will- my 5n's taken a ridiculous amount of film since I first got
it, and I couldn't flaw it or the Sigma 28-70 2.8 in terms of performance.
Never seen my workhorse ill- kinda worried..
Regards,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: Rob Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 09:04:40 -0400, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, it is. The North Carolina Forest Service owns that one. They bring it
around to air shows down here. Although they do not normally do demo drops
(usually there is no place where you could see it from the air show that
You know that is not surprising. I would think that it would focus somewhere
near the hyperfocal distance of the lens wide open because that would be the
maximum contrast point. And that is of course much nearer than infinity.
--
Rob Brigham wrote:
The problems relate to focussing on distant
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of the lists's favorite K-mount lenses are for sale in Russia at
http://www.ekta-f.ru/app/pentax.html
I can't figure out whether the posted prices are in Euros or what. Can one of
our Russian speakers tell us, and also tell us where the seller will ship to?
One
Was kinda bored today so I went out to photograph some Olympians in the
street. Here's former 100m freestyle WR holder Libby Lenton (wearing her
women's 4x100m freestyle relay gold and 50m freestyle bronze). Wish Grant
Hackett wasn't in the background..
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 03:25:58 -0400 (EDT), D. Glenn Arthur Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LOL! Je crois que c'est aussi bien (bon?) que vous ne m'entendez pas!
(Comment ecris-moi des accents dans VT-100 telnet?)
Je parle francais seulement [enough] pour etre dangereux. J'ai
besoin d'un
Hehe.. I know! Isn't it brilliant! :) Just trying to milk it while I can.
Number 2's up for sale, but while it's here, technically it -is- a spare ist
D lying around the house.
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 03,
Thursday, September 2, 2004, 8:46:49 PM, Daniel wrote:
DJM I agree. The one with a single boat gives the impression that the
DJM photographer is all alone in a beautiful wilderness. The other looks
DJM like it was taken at a summer camp somewhere.
DJM They are both very nice shots, however.
I believ the prices are in dollars. They use dollars on the film page:
http://www.ekta-f.ru/special.html
And they seem to be selling Ilford film!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of the lists's favorite K-mount lenses are for sale in Russia at
http://www.ekta-f.ru/app/pentax.html
I can't figure
You are a sick sick man...
frank theriault wrote:
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 11:08:21 +0100, Malcolm Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very nice.
I hope you told the Nikon boys that a boat and a 50mm lens would afford a
good shot from underneath :-)
Malcolm
Thanks, Malcolm! Glad you enjoyed it.
Your
i'm having problems trying to get an email to the list, it keeps coming
back saying i either have attachments or stylized type in it, thought i'd
fixed the type problem and there are no attachments. can the list mgr
email me? thanks.
karen
You know, when I was growing up, my British mother taught me and my
brother how to make those paper cubes.
Of course, she conveniently forgot to tell us that we were supposed to
fill them with water and lob them at each other. Wonder why
-Mat
I've just started working at the Sixth Street Photography Workshop
(http://www.sixthstreetphoto.org) in San Francisco. It's a volunteer
position, and I'll be teaching a few basic photography classes and doing
some darkroom work for them, printing for an upcoming exhibition.
As with many
Hi!
Thanks for all the suggestions. After more looking around, I found on
the web DFSEE, which was later suggested here, even with the author,
Jan, among us! Thanks. Jan, using your utility, I did manage to
restore it, finally! I did a search for all lost partitions, found the
info in the log and
Funny head! When blinking with the right eye, I would turn up my mouth in
the right side - not the left. So, the sculpture looks kind of unnatural to
me. The photograph, however, is very well done.
All the best
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
Dario said:
So, which one do you like best (and WHY!) beteeen the two pictures of those
street performers?
First shot (with the sun behind the buildings):
http://www.dariobonazza.com/paw/paw12.jpg
Second shot (with the sun and different framing):
http://www.dariobonazza.com/paw/paw09.jpg
frank theriault wrote:
Pentax: 'Nuff said:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2665132
LOL!
Canons to the left of him,
Nikons to the right of him.
Malcolm
Good subject and very good light on it, matching very well the oval shape.
The weak point is the too messy background, including the not so evident
couple (close to being just a black spot, at least in my monitor).
Yes, a pleasant picture, but (Sorry) an almost right one in my opinion.
Dario
Pentax's other new motto:
All our lenses are limited.
Joe
The truth is, they have learnt the trick of limiting the supply so that they are more
desirable. The rarer it gets, the more you want it. g
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Does anyone know when this lens will
Sooo...
1600 gallons = 5818.99519 liters
5818.99519 liters weighs 5818.99519 kg
5818.99519 kg - 12828.68845 pounds
Yup - much easier grn
- Original Message -
From: Caveman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: PAW: Water Bomber
Here we just call them idiot yuppies (grin). For 150 years the uniform of the
woodsman was blue jeans, khaki shirt (in summer), plaid wool shirt (rest of
year), hunting boots. Then the bambiests moved into the woods (at one time they
were happy to just look at pictures) and things went to hell.
Caveman mused:
Truth hurts.
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Nasty!
Personally I'd use a B-52 for Pentax.
Technologically way behind the times, but still capable of
doing the job it was designed for as long as you are prepared
to put up with the idiosyncracies of the design.
Perhaps your monitor needs proper calibration ... there's plenty of detail
in the background. I can see the ring on the woman's finger, the curls in
the guy's hair, ripples in his sweatshirt hood, and so on, and that's even
in an improperly lit room (too bright, sun shining in).
Funny how some
Dario,
The 2nd picture definitely shows the
concentration of the musician and the connection
between her and the music.
The first would benefit (I think) from having
people standing and listening in the center to
right side of the picture.
When I first saw the picture, my eyes saw the
And 10lbs per Imperial Gallon which is more likely what Frank was quoting, so
16,000 pounds, or 8 tons. IIRC the NCFS claimed 1800 gallons (US), but since the
tanks are just rectangular fiberglass tanks (one on either side of the cargo
hold) they probably can be set up differently depending on
Hi,
Does anyone prefer to use the super-taks or smc
taks to their equivalent smc K, A, or M lenses.
(I'm not even going to ask about the A*).
See the Pentax 85/1.4 A* for Ricoh on the well
loved and hated auction site?
John Bailey
=
jb `:^)
You need to send plain (ASCII) text. Anything else is supposed to bounce.
--
Karen Clanin wrote:
i'm having problems trying to get an email to the list, it keeps coming
back saying i either have attachments or stylized type in it, thought
i'd fixed the type problem and there are no attachments.
I lie the first one better. I think the more cluttered shot is much
more interesting.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/3/2004 10:35:55 AM
I like the second on. Less cluttered, alowing the eye to concentrate
on
the musician's concentration.
Dario Bonazza wrote:
Since I like Valentin's idea of asking
You probably need to find a way to make your email programme send plain
text. This means that you cannot use programmes or programme settings
that use Hypertext Markup Language (HTML) to put pretty backgrouds on
your message or use obscure fonts. Just the words, ma'am
Karen Clanin wrote:
i'm
Peter J. Alling wrote:
mike.wilson wrote:
Hi,
Shel wrote:
Water weighs just about 8.4 pounds per US gallon.
Persons of a certain age will remember chanting a pint of pure water
weighs a pound and a quarter at school. An imperial gallon weighs
10lbs.
Making the payload 16,000lbs. Or about
Isn't there some urban legend about a scuba diver being scooped up by
one of these and deposited in the finre?
graywolf wrote:
And 10lbs per Imperial Gallon which is more likely what Frank was
quoting, so 16,000 pounds, or 8 tons. IIRC the NCFS claimed 1800 gallons
(US), but since the tanks
Hi DagT,
on 02 Sep 04 you wrote in pentax.list:
I've got one :-)
One of the three that got to Norway in June.
I think Heiko has one too.
Yes, I have. You can find some test images on my webpage (mycroft.de).
cu, Heiko
John Francis wrote on 9/3/2004, 12:36 PM:
Personally I'd use a B-52 for Pentax.
Technologically way behind the times, but still capable of
doing the job it was designed for as long as you are prepared
to put up with the idiosyncracies of the design.
Interesting fact: most pilots
For your reading pleasure:
http://www.snopes.com/horrors/freakish/scuba.htm
t
On 9/3/04 10:53, mike wilson wrote:
Isn't there some urban legend about a scuba diver being scooped up by
one of these and deposited in the finre?
graywolf wrote:
And 10lbs per Imperial Gallon which is more
I thought that was moved back to 2040 or 2050, making the design and
maybe some of the Airframes more than 100 years old.
Christian wrote:
John Francis wrote on 9/3/2004, 12:36 PM:
Personally I'd use a B-52 for Pentax.
Technologically way behind the times, but still capable of
doing the
Hi Wendy,
This summer, I considered pros and cons of a couple of converters. My
aim was to find a raw converter that gave the best possible starting
point for further editing. After trying a default-regime with the
Pentax PhotoLab, thumbsPlus and BreezeBrowser, I came to think of a
no-tweaking
PZ-1p, KEH EX+ condition, includes grip strap, extra battery,
everready case, instruction manual, neckstrap, body cap, etc.
Beautiful condition and works beautifully. $325 including
shipping/insurance in the continental U.S.
If you'd like an SMC-FA 50mm f/1.4 lens in EX+ condition w/caps to go
Christian mused:
John Francis wrote on 9/3/2004, 12:36 PM:
Personally I'd use a B-52 for Pentax.
Technologically way behind the times, but still capable of
doing the job it was designed for as long as you are prepared
to put up with the idiosyncracies of the design.
Buy Ilford, cheap. Not film, the whole damn company:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3605614.stm
--John
=
J Mason
Charlottesville, Virginia
New! Democracy of Speed, a Photo Documentary Project:
http://www.people.virginia.edu/~ds8s/john-m/john-m.html
Okay, since we're into fifth decimal accuracy now, I can't resist...
Water density is not constant, but varies with temperature (and
salinity, of course, but let's keep seawater out of the discussion).
At 4°C (34°F), the density is 1, which means that one litre weights
one kilogram. The numbers
På 3. sep. 2004 kl. 19.54 skrev Dr. Heiko Hamann:
Hi DagT,
on 02 Sep 04 you wrote in pentax.list:
I've got one :-)
One of the three that got to Norway in June.
I think Heiko has one too.
Yes, I have. You can find some test images on my webpage (mycroft.de).
cu, Heiko
My test images are here
Peter J. Alling wrote on 9/3/2004, 2:49 PM:
I thought that was moved back to 2040 or 2050, making the design and
maybe some of the Airframes more than 100 years old.
oops yeah I think it was 2050 making it 100 years old.
--
Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tim wrote on 9/3/2004, 2:33 PM:
For your reading pleasure:
http://www.snopes.com/horrors/freakish/scuba.htm
CSI the tv show on American CBS had an episode where a scuba diver was
found in a tree following a forest fire. The actual incident that
killed him and got him in the tree
Welcome to the digital world of Pentaxist's, Stuart! I'm sure you'll enjoy
using this brilliant piece of machinery.
I got mine Monday - nad have been using it every day since (just 4 days, and
I feel I always had it).
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
It's: I am a Pentaxist!
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 3. september 2004 16:36
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: *ist D purchased on a whim
Cotty wrote:
On 3/9/04, Ryan
All criticisms and comments welcome.
http://www.oksne.net/paw/fjellgard.html
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: jtainter
Subject: Re: Availability of the new Pentax smc-D 100mm F2.8 macro
Pentax's other new motto:
All our lenses are limited.
Lenses?
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: *ist D purchased on a whim
Welcome to the digital world of Pentaxist's, Stuart! I'm sure
you'll enjoy
using this brilliant piece of machinery.
I got mine Monday - nad have been using it every day since (just 4
days, and
I feel I
Fra wrote:
But it's a big conspiracy of the camera companies, you see. They make
all the expensive little piece of cheap plastic or rubber
accessories easily misplacable (I lost the rubber eyecup from my
non-Pentax DSLR on the first day of using it, I lost the rubber eyecup
from my Pentax MX few
Well Paul, you've more or less got until the rebate ends (end of the year?)
to wait for a further price drop. Considering that they're unlikely to
reduce the cost of the lens, I think this current offer's good to go for,
assuming you want the lens.
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
Yes, I do want the lens. I have the Sigma 17-35, but I think the Pentax
is a better piece of glass. I'll probably be putting the Sigma on ebay.
I really need a second body now to cover some out of town assignments,
so I think I'll make the leap. I've sold enough other equipment to
pretty much
Yeah overblown highlights, the panning's effect on the background, Grant
Hackett in the background, the news crew person- radiance is pretty blinding
huh.
Cheers,
Ryan
a pretty girl who kicks ass in the pool earns extra points..
From: cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I didn't want the lens at first, but now I'm really missing the moderate
wide angle. Plus the fact the 16 45 is a constant too. And don't forget the
cost of a battery grip, and another big card.. The 17 35 will probably pay
for only one of these..
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From:
From: graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You need to send plain (ASCII) text. Anything else is supposed to bounce.
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You probably need to find a way to make your email programme send plain
text. This means that you cannot use programmes or programme settings
that use
I've noticed similar problem with my Sigma 24mm f/1.8. AF appears off, manual focus
OK. I get the same problem with the MZ-S though, and have verified the problem on the
slides I got back. I assumed it was either something about the Sigma lens that caused
the problem, or that Pentax AF isn't
On 3/9/04, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
I've never had a bad beer twice.
I've had a bad beer twice when there wasn't a good beer to be had.
Paul
LOL. Yeah, okay, I'll buy that.
And the beer 8-]
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On 3/9/04, Karen Clanin, discombobulated, unleashed:
You probably need to find a way to make your email programme send plain
text. This means that you cannot use programmes or programme settings
that use Hypertext Markup Language (HTML) to put pretty backgrouds on
your message or use obscure
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: *ist D purchased on a whim
If you go over there to do it, you bet you sweet bippy it will be
a
bad beer.
ww
I've never had a bad beer twice.
Cheap drunk, eh?
HAR!!
WW
On 3/9/04, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
If you go over there to do it, you bet you sweet bippy it will be
a
bad beer.
ww
I've never had a bad beer twice.
Cheap drunk, eh?
HAR!!
WW
You know me so well WW!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
http://www.olympus-esystem.jp/
Slap my ass and call me Sally. Olympus make things nobody wants and
Pentax does the opposite!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Hi Sally,
I can't really find any specs. At least not in English. Looks okay.
What the hell is it?
Paul
On Sep 3, 2004, at 7:02 PM, Cotty wrote:
http://www.olympus-esystem.jp/
Slap my ass and call me Sally. Olympus make things nobody wants and
Pentax does the opposite!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
On 3/9/04, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hi Sally,
I can't really find any specs. At least not in English. Looks okay.
What the hell is it?
DPR reckons it'll be a lower spec E system body. A baby E ?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
