Well, no it really doesn't have The Knarf Look, it's way to sharp.
Caveman wrote:
Hey, it has The Knarf Look ! So it's not the camera, it's the
photographer ! ;-)
Nice capture, Frank. Wish you success with Photoshop, if you're
adventurous, you'll be able to do some really cool things.
--
I
If Espon and Chinon(Yoightlander), built a classic K mount digital body
based on their Leica digital with
the Bessaflex prism, (probably not as difficult as it might sound), I
would bet Pentax would change their mind
fairly quickly.
Jim Apilado wrote:
I recently had to replace my useable cell
JB On my way home from work, I drove by the local Yact Club, when the weather
JB suddenly changed to rain.
JB I came across these wind surfers:
JB http://gallery46369.fotopic.net/p7576484.html
Very good shot! I much like the rainbow:)
Attila
Paul, I have tried it, I know exactly how easy it is to use, (and in
many circumstances it is more than adequate), but it still pisses me off
that the Camera was purposefully pprevented from fully using the K/M
lenses. I understand exactly how John feels. It is the main reason
that I don't
And so it continues
http://au.news.yahoo.com/040916/2/qt1d.html
Love, Light and Peace,
- Peter Loveday
Director of Development, eyeon Software
Hello Cotty,
Thursday, September 16, 2004, 1:27:53 AM, you wrote:
C Okay, I'll bite
C http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/spare.html
LOL! Seriously Cotty, you should start your own magazine sooner or
laterg
Attila
Looks like it's Rob's point, especially since the late and in some
quarters lamented MZ-D apparently had full K mount compatibility.
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 15 Sep 2004 at 19:24, Keith Whaley wrote:
Ha, ha... I knew you'd say that...
No disrespect meant, Rob.
You have a background in
That's a very cool shot.
Fred Widall wrote:
This evening I noticed the sun was casting the shadows of my grandson's
toy dinosaurs on the wall producing an interesting image.
Hope you like it.
http://ist.uwaterloo.ca/~fwwidall/dinos.html
Hello frank,
Thursday, September 16, 2004, 2:39:01 AM, you wrote:
ft I've also decided to install Photoshop today, and this is my first
ft attempt at doing anything with it - it sure is different from anything
ft else I've tried, but it's obviously much more powerful as well.
ft Better get one
On Sep 16, 2004, at 5:26 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
As it stands, it comes across as a snapshot of a place
visited.
That's pretty much all it was meant to be. As you said, the sky was
all wrong. Unfortunately the weather was pretty nasty the entire week.
Cheers,
- Dave
PL And so it continues
PL http://au.news.yahoo.com/040916/2/qt1d.html
Very sad news;( Anyone knows how Fuji is doing?
Attila
http://ns.atn.ro/~attila/album/view.php?i=6
This is also from the botanical garden. Perhaps someone who knows
flowers better than me could confirm if it is really a Hibiscus as I
think, or something else.
Attila
I swear I'm going to be checking the tradingpost online every day first
thing in the morning from now!
Quokka? lol!
Cheers,
Ryan
PS. Where in WA are ya?
- Original Message -
From: Nenad Djurdjevic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 3:18 PM
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 19:30:00 -0400, Graywolf wrote:
Repeatedly increasing or decreasing the size by about 10% until you have
an image the size you want.
--
Illinois Bill wrote:
And the trick is?
I tried this with Photoshop CS and I have to say I prefer the single
step enlarged image to the
There may be some truth to the perception, but the perception was created
to fool the general public and to aid the business. By no mean the inner
decisions were made based on ethical reasons.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
False, companies fortune's ride on public perception.
When you
Peter J. Alling mused:
Paul, I have tried it, I know exactly how easy it is to use, (and in
many circumstances it is more than adequate), but it still pisses me off
that the Camera was purposefully pprevented from fully using the K/M
lenses. I understand exactly how John feels. It is
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0409/04091605nikond2x.asp
Velly intellesting - they've used CMOS sensor for the first time :-)
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
I haven't heard any more logical arguments to date.
Damn, I posted 2 technical reasons came to mind but both didn't show up.
What's wrong with the list?
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
_
Powerful Parental Controls Let your
No full frame as announced, yet what a disappointment. The day full
35mm frame gets back as a standard looks further than ever.
The 12 MPixel on the APS senzor will stress the lens quality issue -
I doubt any Nikon zoom will be sharp at that resolution.
Also the analog white balance may
hahahaha - great one cotty!
Tanya Mayer Photography
Qld, Australia
www.tanyamayer.com
Ph +61 (07) 49831247
Mobile +61 0429831247
-Original Message-
From: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 16 September 2004 4:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO:
Alin Flaider wrote on 16.09.04 9:39:
No full frame as announced, yet what a disappointment. The day full
35mm frame gets back as a standard looks further than ever.
The 12 MPixel on the APS senzor will stress the lens quality issue -
I doubt any Nikon zoom will be sharp at that resolution.
I can think of 2 technical reasons why the mechanical coupling was not
employed in *istD *istDS.
1) Due to the unique design of the inner chassis (basically a few metal
sheets screwed together), there is no space for the coupling ring because
the lens mount was tightened onto the front metal
Alan Chan a écrit :
I can think of 2 technical reasons why the mechanical coupling was not
employed in *istD *istDS.
No Alan,
The design of the *ist DS is why the mechanical coupling was not
employed in *istD *istDS. !!
Michel
I am looking for an early Pentax flash to do rear curtain sync.
Does the AF200T or do I need to go to the 240 for this?
Currently I have the 360FGZ but it fires a pre-flash for focusing
and I do no want this as it fires off all the other flashes and
they do not recover in time for the main
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Kevin Waterson wrote:
I am looking for an early Pentax flash to do rear curtain sync.
Does the AF200T or do I need to go to the 240 for this?
Neither. You need an F (digitally controlled) flash.
http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/technology/hot-shoe/index.html
Kostas
Sarcasm Peter?
On 15/9/04 11:43 pm, Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Much as I hate to encourage bitching for bitching's sake.
Any suggestions / tutorials for mounting slides at home? Best way to trim
the frames? Sources for plastic slide mounts? Thanks!
Shel
On 16/9/04, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sure it's an educated guess but
I'm educated.
Mark, note that one down, mate ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Given that pentax havnt sold a K or M lens for a number of years it wouldl
not make much business sense to spend too much money supporting old gear
either. There is nothing unethical about it.
A.
On 16/9/04 12:59 am, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax wants you to replace
This one time, at band camp, Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neither. You need an F (digitally controlled) flash.
http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/technology/hot-shoe/index.html
Very useful, thanks for the link. From that I see the
AF240FT should do it.
Kind regards
Kevin
-
Trying it is one thing. Using it every day is another. When you use it
every day, it becomes second nature. You don't even realize you're
doing it. After 8 months or so with the *istD, It feels just like an LX
in ap priority mode when I use it with K or M lenses. My finger just
pops the green
On 16/9/04, Boros Attila, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://ns.atn.ro/~attila/album/view.php?i=6
This is also from the botanical garden. Perhaps someone who knows
flowers better than me could confirm if it is really a Hibiscus as I
think, or something else.
Attila
Nice but needs a faster
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neither. You need an F (digitally controlled) flash.
http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/technology/hot-shoe/index.html
Very useful, thanks for the link. From that I see the
On 16 Sep 2004 at 14:31, Peter Loveday wrote:
PS. *AR!*
PPS. *ARGGGH!*
Argh indeed! Not me either :(
I bet Rob got it :)
Nope, not me, I have two remaining LXen and I figure if I don't look I won't be
tempted.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel
Actually, I don't.
Does an ILX differ from a plain ole' LX?
Don
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 11:28 PM
To: PDML
Subject: D*MNIT! A bargain hunter misses out.
That's in Aussie dollars as well. We all know
One question Paul: Once the exposure has been set and the aperture chosen,
is it necessary to use the green button for subsequent exposures if they
are all going to be at the same aperture and exp value?
Shel
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trying it is one thing. Using it every day
From abc news:
Kodak Australasia has announced plans to close manufacturing operations at
its plant at Coburg in Melbourne's north.
Six hundred and fifty workers will lose their jobs as a result of the
shutdown.
Union officials have been locked out of a meeting between Kodak management
and
Ryan Lee wrote:
I swear I'm going to be checking the tradingpost online every day first
thing in the morning from now!
Quokka? lol!
PS. Where in WA are ya?
Quokka: a type of marsupial that looks like a cross between a rat and a
small kangaroo that lives on an island off the coast of Perth,
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Once the exposure has been set and the aperture chosen, is it
necessary to use the green button for subsequent exposures if they are
all going to be at the same aperture and exp value?
No.
A press on the green button does a light metering that takes
That is why it is such a good thing to post these auctions here on the list, so we all
can decide to bid on these opportunities.
On Thursday 16 September 2004 08:58, Ryan Lee wrote:
FJW I swear I'm going to be checking the tradingpost online every day first
FJW thing in the morning from now!
FJW
Ryan Lee wrote:
I swear I'm going to be checking the tradingpost online every day first
thing in the morning from now!
Quokka? lol!
PS. Where in WA are ya?
Quokka: a type of marsupial that looks like a cross between a rat and a
small kangaroo that lives on an island off the coast of Perth,
No, it isn't necessary to press the green button for a subsequent shots
at the same exposure. The camera will maintain the same shutter speed
and aperture. When I'm shooting somewhere where the light is changing I
hit the button before each shot. I've found that this becomes an almost
Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15 Sep 2004 at 19:24, Keith Whaley wrote:
Ha, ha... I knew you'd say that...
No disrespect meant, Rob.
You have a background in engineering, can you seriously imagine a reason why it
wouldn't have been practical or economical to implement given it's
Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't give one whit about the frame rate (anything would be quicker
than my TLR) or the lack of MLU (that's what the B setting and black
velvet are for).
Just to nit-pick: The MLU doesn't really make any difference at
exposure times long enough to be
Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0409/04091605nikond2x.asp
Velly intellesting - they've used CMOS sensor for the first time :-)
Still DX size sensor (1.5 FOV crop).
I can hear the laughter and champagne corks popping at Canon...
It has been replaced with a less shadow one now. I asked a few persons and
they all think the new one is better. :-)
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Nice shots there Alan! I particularly like 36 (some sunlight and I would
like it even more- the weather feels overcast..)and 37 (very
Well thats a bit of a turn around Greworld. Glad you finally realised it
though. Mickey Mouse indeed.
A.
On 16/9/04 5:16 am, Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LOL! Just messing with trying to upgrade the mickey mouse operating
system on my computer. Your comment hits the spot.
--
Bruce
Bruce's comments got me to take a look at this shot, which I overlooked
when it was first posted. It's a well done photo Paul, but the doesn't
move me like earlier Ferraris. To my eye it's become a generic super
sports car, lacking in the kind of style and panache of the older egg
crate grille
Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16 Sep 2004 at 5:42, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
While making coffee this morning I was thinking that it's too bad digital
is pretty much worthless for BW.
Yes it will be great when there is no longer a technical advantage to shoot BW
film. ;-)
I don't
On 16 Sep 2004 at 15:58, Alin Flaider wrote:
BTW, Nikon made public its support for full-frame in a very
original manner, with the announcement of F6. It'll be interesting
to see how this goes with the small sensors in the digital line.
Mark Roberts wrote on 16.09.04 18:09:
And Chasseur d'Images is saying the Canon EOS 2D full-frame, 22
megapixel camera is coming soon.
Maybe, but the price??? So far 11MPix 1Ds is almost twice as expensive as
supposed price for D2X (about 4000-4500USD). So there is always trade off
:-)
--
ROTFLMAO
Shel
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes it will be great when there is no longer a technical advantage to
shoot BW
film. ;-)
I don't think there *is* a technical advantage any more. You have to
come to GFM next year and see some of Tom VanVeen's black white
prints
Rob Studdert wrote on 16.09.04 15:16:
Someone must have made a mistake, it's not April 1st, I heard here years ago
that the F5 would be the very last film F series body. LOL
Maybe rumours that F6 will be able to accomodate digital back were true?
PS I wonder if they could have squeezed in an
On 16 Sep 2004 at 9:11, Mark Roberts wrote:
I don't think there *is* a technical advantage any more. You have to
come to GFM next year and see some of Tom VanVeen's black white
prints from digital. They convinced me.
I don't doubt they are great looking prints (and I'd love to see then in
Hi,
Thursday, September 16, 2004, 11:38:36 AM, Shel wrote:
Any suggestions / tutorials for mounting slides at home? Best way to trim
the frames? Sources for plastic slide mounts? Thanks!
Gepe make good plastic mounts that are very easy to use. I do it on a
lightbox (there's a bumper
Sylwester wrote:
SP On the other hand you can say that with
SP APS-C sensor you get better use of long lenses - not loosing resolution in
SP case of D2X.
If those long lenses can cope with the 88 lpm resolution of the 12
MP sensor.
SP Really? Can you point to web page with this official
Alin Flaider wrote on 16.09.04 15:29:
If those long lenses can cope with the 88 lpm resolution of the 12
MP sensor.
Of course, that's why it is worth of waiting for real world tests :-)
Mea culpa, I read the headlines backwards. In fact they announced
new EF-S lenses:
On 16 Sep 2004 at 23:11, David Nelson wrote:
Remember Rob, the more of a
success this camera is, the more chance you'll get your high end pentax
DSLR. Tell your friends about it (-:
Nice thought, but I can't flog Pentax to anyone I know with a clear conscience
given their late track
Rob Studdert wrote on 16.09.04 15:32:
Nice thought, but I can't flog Pentax to anyone I know with a clear conscience
given their late track record.
Let's hope *istDs will be breakthrough :-)
I'll have to admit I've pointed most people
towards the market leader.
HAR! So it was you! ;-)
--
On 16 Sep 2004 at 23:30, Ryan Lee wrote:
Still! It would need to have a shot of vodka jelly in its belly to be not
worth AUD150 with a 50 1.7 (I'm guessing it was an M..)..
Sure but after you finally got it back from CRK (3 months and several calls
later and a lot poorer) you would then have
Hi,
I don't think there *is* a technical advantage any more. You have to
come to GFM next year and see some of Tom VanVeen's black white
prints from digital. They convinced me.
I don't doubt they are great looking prints (and I'd love to see then in
person) but I think it really does
Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16 Sep 2004 at 15:58, Alin Flaider wrote:
BTW, Nikon made public its support for full-frame in a very
original manner, with the announcement of F6. It'll be interesting
to see how this goes with the small sensors in the digital line.
Mark Roberts wrote on 16.09.04 18:47:
BTW: Didn't the F5 have interchangeable prisms?
Yes it had.
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
It's not completely useless for BW. I've made some decent conversions and have printed
them with some success on my Epson 2200. With a dedicated BW printer that uses a full
set of grayscale inks, very good results are possible. I've seen some great inkjet BW
prints in some pro portfolios.
OK, now it's time for me to unsub for my vacation time :-) Be nice for each
other when I am away in Italy and... read you soon :-)
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
Alin Flaider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sylwester wrote:
SP On the other hand you can say that with
SP APS-C sensor you get better use of long lenses - not loosing resolution in
SP case of D2X.
If those long lenses can cope with the 88 lpm resolution of the 12
MP sensor.
The real test of
Mark Roberts wrote on 16.09.04 18:57:
I'll bet that even if the predictions of the EOS 2D having 22
megapixels are wrong (I'm skeptical myself) Canon will apply the low
noise technology from the 1D-II sensor to a new full-frame sensor and
create an ultra-low-noise 11-12 megapixel camera that
On 16 Sep 2004 at 15:51, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote on 16.09.04 18:47:
BTW: Didn't the F5 have interchangeable prisms?
Yes it had.
I thought that was an F series given? That's sad, probably impossible to do
with all the gadgetry now housed in the prism. I used David Ns
Rob Studdert wrote on 16.09.04 16:07:
I thought that was an F series given? That's sad, probably impossible to do
with all the gadgetry now housed in the prism. I used David Ns Refconvertor on
my *ist D last time we met up, I'd never tried one before, I appreciate my LX
finders now :-)
LX
I've steered people to Pentax who are looking for a mid-priced DSLR. I simply tell
them that they can find plenty of used lenses that are relatively inexpensive. That is
a convincing argument for the *istD.
On 16 Sep 2004 at 23:11, David Nelson wrote:
Remember Rob, the more of a
Lol! Owe me nothing- don't be silly ;-) Although if you must, please choose
an item from my wishlist (the someday affordable version, not the sell my
guitar then sell a kidney and beg them for a discount version):
1. AF 1.7x Converter (I sold my first one.. to finance other things..)
2. DA 14-65
On 15/9/04, Alan Chan, discombobulated, unleashed:
I can think of 2 technical reasons why the mechanical coupling was not
employed in *istD *istDS.
1) Due to the unique design of the inner chassis (basically a few metal
sheets screwed together), there is no space for the coupling ring because
with the announcement of F6. It'll be interesting
to see how this goes with the small sensors in the digital line.
http://nikonimaging.com/global/news/2004/0916_02.htm
Well, what would be *really* funny would be if the F6 took APS film...
I think Nikon missed an opportunity both for
That's hilarious! You should have got a picture of his reaction- digital of
course..
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 11:47 PM
Subject: Re: Use of Green Button (was Re: istDs - what a great camera!)
This place resembles speakers corner a little more each day.
A.
On 15/9/04 10:46 pm, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look, I'm a very big proponent of both backwards compatibility (in all
things, not just cameras) and perhaps an even greater proponent of manual
gear than most other
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Bruce's comments got me to take a look at this shot, which I overlooked
when it was first posted. It's a well done photo Paul, but the doesn't
move me like earlier Ferraris. To my eye it's become a generic super
sports car, lacking in the kind of style and panache of the
If I remember correctly, operating the DOF preview lever around the shutter
release does the same than the green button in manual on the *ist D (I usually
use the green button however). So as the *ist Ds HAS DOF preview this COULD
work similarly.
If this worked like on the *ist D, the cheaper
On 16/9/04, Sylwester Pietrzyk, discombobulated, unleashed:
OK, now it's time for me to unsub for my vacation time :-) Be nice for each
other when I am away in Italy and... read you soon :-)
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
Have a good time Sylwek. You meeting up with Giancarlo? He is a charming
Cotty wrote on 16.09.04 16:34:
Have a good time Sylwek.
Thanks Cotty, I'll try my best :-)
You meeting up with Giancarlo? He is a charming
host
Unfortunately not, but I plan to make one day meeting with Dario in Ravenna
:-)
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
On 16/9/04, Sylwester Pietrzyk, discombobulated, unleashed:
Unfortunately not, but I plan to make one day meeting with Dario in Ravenna
:-)
Have a great time,
ciaiaiaaiaoiaaoiou,
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
I'm hoping this makes it to the list; I'll check the archives later to see
if it did. I haven't gotten digest postings since sometime Sunday. Emails to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have not been responded to, nor have attempts to
re-subscribe (via [EMAIL PROTECTED]). I'm still getting hundreds of emails
per
Cotty wrote on 16.09.04 16:39:
Have a great time,
ciaiaiaaiaoiaaoiou,
Grazie molto! ;-)
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've steered people to Pentax who are looking for a mid-priced DSLR. I simply tell
them that they can find plenty of used lenses that are relatively inexpensive. That
is a convincing argument for the *istD.
How about the viewfinder?
Kostas
Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
with the announcement of F6. It'll be interesting
to see how this goes with the small sensors in the digital line.
http://nikonimaging.com/global/news/2004/0916_02.htm
Well, what would be *really* funny would be if the F6 took APS film...
Thanks. I
Stephen Moore wrote on 9/16/2004, 10:29 AM:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
When I was in my mid- to late-teens, I used to go down to Luigi
Chinetti's
shop in NYC a few Saturdays a month, and, for some reason, was
allowed back
in the shop area where the cars were repaired, and
I've gotten indication that my previous post earlier this morning made it to
the list ok, although I'm still not getting anyone's postings. Anyhoo,
thought you all might be interested in my latest image sensor cover story in
EDN:
www.reed-electronics.com/ednmag/article/CA450596
Both my *ist D
Just a comment: I think the folks on this list really overestimate the
importance of extreme wide angles. Most of the market for these kinds of
cameras use mostly telephotos, so that concentrating the pixels into a
smaller space is an advantage. The noise issue for the denser sensor
remains, of
Strangely enough my opinion is that they simply no longer make lenses
that use that coupling, so they decided they did not need it in the
camera. Many of us here on the list sound a lot like those folks who
screamed because their car no longer came with a starting crank.
Then the screaming
Interesting food for thought. Thanks, keith
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 15 Sep 2004 at 22:46, Keith Whaley wrote:
True. But one does need a memory card (and you note they did compact that
area on this body...)
Subtract a power source (battery volume) and LCD space... Perhaps the lens
mechanical
Digital seems to be the catch all excuse these days. Certainly they did
not close the plant and put all those folks out of work because they can
produce the product cheaper someplace else. That might piss off customers.
With Kodak having dumped something around 100,000 jobs here in the US
over
No, Don, it is just that the double stroke L on the camera looks abit
like IL. Some folks mistake it for ILX or 1LX, but they are all the same
camera though there was a mid-stream upgrade to the shutter on them
which Pentax usually fixed for free if you sent the early camera in for
any kind
And the Pentax virtues are?
Christian wrote:
Peter J. Alling wrote on 9/15/2004, 1:27 PM:
I'm not a Canon weenie, just tell him to get a real camera.
ha! Trust me, I've explained the virtues of Pentax ad nauseum
Ooooh, a flame war.
While I agree with you, Kostas, about posting auctions. I think we can
equate top posters and bottom posters to top feeders and bottom feeders
(grin).
I read most of the messages on the list. I have no desire to read them
again and again (even I do not have that much time
Lon Williamson wrote on 9/16/2004, 11:49 AM:
And the Pentax virtues are?
This list for one! :-)
Can't think of anym ore right now... :-P
--
Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think there's an inside joke, here... g
keith
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
ROTFLMAO
Shel
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes it will be great when there is no longer a technical advantage to
shoot BW film. ;-)
I don't think there *is* a technical advantage any more. You have to
come to
Sylwester wrote:
SP EOS-1Ds has similar noise level to coming from the same
SP era EOS-D60 or 10D despite having much bigger pixel pitch.
I think they have the same pixel pitch.
Servus, Alin
http://nikonimaging.com/global/news/2004/0916_02.htm
He, he, told you so...
--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html
On 16/9/04, Graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://nikonimaging.com/global/news/2004/0916_02.htm
He, he, told you so...
Special order only? ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
On 16/9/04, Graywolf, discombobulated,
unleashed:
http://nikonimaging.com/global/news/2004/0916_02.htm
He, he, told you so...
Special order only? ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
I have all that on my D2h and use it in Av mode with single sensor
We've been keeping a record of our camera sales at the Wally World where I
work. Since Sept 1, we've sold 1 PS film camera and 27 digicams.
Bill
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
