I've made close to 100 12 x 18 prints from *istD RAW files. I am very
satisfied with them. They appear to be sharper and more detailed than
anything I've printed from 35mm film.
Paul Stenquist
On Sep 24, 2004, at 12:56 AM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Sung Nee
Subject:
Am I crazy or not? g
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan/pentax_z1p_custom_eyepiece
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
_
Scan and help eliminate destructive viruses from your inbound and outbound
e-mail and attachments.
Hi,
Pentax appears to be collecting data on purchasers with a hook of
entering you for the cash prize draw.
Can anyone spot in the page a question that asks you precisiely what you
bought? You are given five generic options on the previous page. This
seems to alter only questions 7 9.
I replaced one of these due to an idiotic comment that I didn't want
Amy to see. (It wasn't from a list member.) They're now here:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2724330
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2723517
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2723528
I'm sorry
i didn't say it was linear anyway. tooling and assembly jigs can easily cost
a hundred times more, per unit, than the part to be inserted.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 12:30 AM
Subject: Re:
On 24/9/04, Dario Bonazza, discombobulated, unleashed:
Maybe Sylwek? ;-)
Dario
Could be Sylwek's fiance?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
mike.wilson wrote:
Can anyone spot in the page a question that asks you
precisiely what you bought? You are given five generic
options on the previous page. This seems to alter only
questions 7 9.
http://comserv.prodregister.com/pentax/tfe01.shtml
I note it goes into a secure screen
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 23:41:08 +0100, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, how would you pronounce theriaultian?
More to the point, why would one want to?
To impress the chicks, man!
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Ryan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strange you should mention! I've never watched red dwarf and a friend's
passed me a cd full of it and I'm tasked with watching it all.. He says
season 1 is terrible and might discourage me.. I have yet to brace myself
and hit play..
Oh season 1 isn't bad. But
One problem with Canon IS that it must be turned off when the camera is on a tripod.
Otherwise it create its own problems. Vibration is actually introduced as it is
predictive of motion!
Sincerely,
C.Brendemuehl
Politics is supposed to be the second oldest
I regularly do 20x30s and I am constantly surprised at how great they come
out...
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 24 September 2004 6:03 PM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: Largest print with *istD
On 24/9/04, Sung Nee, discombobulated,
Hi,
Alan wrote:
Am I crazy or not? g
Not. No grin.
Now, will you do mine? guesswhetherI'mgrinningornot
mike
CITY OF SUNDERLAND COLLEGE DISCLAIMER
Confidentiality: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
Am I crazy or not? g
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan/pentax_z1p_custom_eyepiece
No, but you're neck-and-neck with Cotty in the King of the Pentax
Tinkerers contest...
;-)
Fred
Lets hope it happens while there is still film out there to buy.
I am spending more time explaining digital to people than I ever did
explaining film.
William Robb
Same here. I've found that showing some photos taken with the Optio S or
Optio MX and printed on the Frontier 375 show the average
On 24/9/04, CRB, discombobulated, unleashed:
One problem with Canon IS that it must be turned off when the camera is
on a tripod. Otherwise it create its own problems. Vibration is
actually introduced as it is predictive of motion!
This is not true of all IS lenses.
Certain lenses have an
On 24/9/04, Fred, discombobulated, unleashed:
Am I crazy or not? g
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan/pentax_z1p_custom_eyepiece
No, but you're neck-and-neck with Cotty in the King of the Pentax
Tinkerers contest...
;-)
Fred
Hey Fred. Just converted a K15mm 3.5 to EOS mount. Details soon ;-)
Graywolf wrote:
I remember the lego projects. You put a lot of time into
them. Are they perminent or do you tear them down after
you have photographed them?
The small ones are torn apart after they've been to a couple train shows
or sci-fi conventions. The church is still in my living room,
Mr. OConnell:
I could give more serious consideration to your point of view if you
could try to be a little less arrogant.
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
It must suck to be vision impaired, he
states wide open right in the post.
I read it right the first time, you didn't.
His proof example only proves
Sung Nee wrote on 9/23/2004, 10:00 PM:
Hello everybody
I just would like to know what is the largest print that you have done
with
your *istD and whether you were satisfied with it.
Thank you all in advance.
20x30 inches. I'm really happy with the way it turned out.
--
Have the themes for '05 been set yet?
Sincerely,
C.Brendemuehl
Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have come to realize that
it bears a very close resemblance to the first. Ronald Reagan
Thank you guys.
That's probably the only shot I can call street photography that I
took in the last couple of weeks. I'm on my way back from my trip, in
Utah today.
j
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 23:17:07 -0400, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:43:07 -0400, Juan Buhler
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 23:19:58 -0400, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What could possibly be lower on the food chain than a FED?
Depends on how you see it. I find Feds (and Zorkis, Kievs, etc) to be
fascinating examples of how camera design will evolve without market
forces and
A double header at that...
John Forbes wrote:
Talking about interesting juxtapositions, look at the shape of the
parking meter.
John
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 21:59:12 -0400, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:07:01 -0600, William Robb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This
You don't have to ask, we already knew...
Alan Chan wrote:
Am I crazy or not? g
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan/pentax_z1p_custom_eyepiece
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
_
Scan and help eliminate destructive viruses from your
That's right tooling and assembly jigs cost considerably more, if it's
designed in from the beginning the additional cost
can be minuscule. In this case it probably would have been.
Herb Chong wrote:
i didn't say it was linear anyway. tooling and assembly jigs can easily cost
a hundred times
On 2004-09-23 17:14, Martin Trautmann wrote:
But how does it actually work?
- how many millimeters is the sensor shifted for stabilisation?
as a side note:
is it shifting horizontally and vertically only? Overlaying these two
movements you can move diagonal as well. But you can't compensate
I have a FED that is nearly identical to my Leica iiif, and it seems to function
almost as well. I think the shutter is a tiny bit noisier, but it may just be
underlubricated. Other than that, it's a smooth operating, nicely made camera. The FED
came with an Industar 50/3.5, which is a dead
FWIW, I live in Amsterdam and from experience I can say it's not the
easiest place to buy new Pentax gear. Even the official Pentax
specialist, a shop named Esser, generally has little in stock and sells at
or near the importer's recommended retail price. For new gear, I concur
with others who
I've used some of these fakes ... much prefer to call them copies or
replicas ... as well as some Jupiter lenses, They're OK ... the Jupiter
lenses are actually better than some of the older Leica glass.
Once again, we have seen negative comments from people who've probably not
used the items in
JC,
What direction is the sail boat moving? I tried
shooting a river boat on the Mississippi River
with my 4x5 several years ago and I believe it
was blurred at 1/30 sec. I looked at some of my
4x5 transparancies (static poses) and just love
their detail!
John B
--- J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL
As some of you may remember I have promised to post a 6x6 photograph from my
helicopter in the beginning of this month.
This is the 6x6 phoptpgraph (here it's croped and compressed), which was
chosen to be used in the project for our 42 ha habour extention etc. (I am a
city planner/architect,
- Original Message -
From: John Forbes
Subject: Re: A random snapshot
Talking about interesting juxtapositions, look at the shape of the
parking
meter.
I could have positioned that better.
b...
- Original Message -
From: Daniel J. Matyola
Subject: Re: A random snapshot
Mr. OConnell:
I could give more serious consideration to your point of view if
you
could try to be a little less arrogant.
Whee, I missed that one.
For the record, my initial metering was done several
They do that at the expense of image smear. That would not be good for
stills.
rg
Graywolf wrote:
Tell that to the video camera makers, they apparently don't know that.
--
Gonz wrote:
Do you mean electronically? That would not work. Image stabilization
can only be done mechanically, either
I read the article about the new Minolta in pop photo, but thinking back
now I am confused by something. I don't have the magazine here to
check, but I swear they said they put a 500 mirror lens on the camera
and that the image stabilized through the viewfinder when they engaged
IS. How could
Nice shot, Jens. Love that Velvia color.
Paul
As some of you may remember I have promised to post a 6x6 photograph from my
helicopter in the beginning of this month.
This is the 6x6 phoptpgraph (here it's croped and compressed), which was
chosen to be used in the project for our 42 ha habour
- Original Message -
From: John Bailey
Subject: 4x5 experience - not Pentax WAS: Even more compatibility
issues again!
JC,
What direction is the sail boat moving? I tried
shooting a river boat on the Mississippi River
with my 4x5 several years ago and I believe it
was blurred at
Thanks Paul and Maris.
Luckily, I am paid to do stuff like this, so I'm very happy, you think it's
OK. It's a great pleasure for me to be able to do photgraphs and fly, at the
same time. Both are among my favorite activities!
Our cunsultants will blend the photgraph with a computer model
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: 4x5 experience - not Pentax WAS: Even more compatibility
issues again!
Try one in daylight. It is very possible
to get much faster shutter speeds than
you are suggesting. Guess you missed my post stating the
fact that press
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: A random snapshot
You still havent got it yet. Let me explain
for the 4th time.
No John, I get it, you don't understand that for something that is
only going to affect my life once a decade, I am not going to pay
much heed to.
It's been noticed before..
Andreas Wirtz wrote:
look at:
http://new.dpnow.com/691a.html
Andreas
___
Do you Yahoo!?
Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now.
http://messenger.yahoo.com
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a
[sigh]
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
You still havent got it yet. Let me explain
for the 4th time.
- Original Message -
From: Caveman
Subject: Re: OT - An interesting fake?
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Theory may be fine, but
practical experience is paramount.
Cut the crap, Shel. This sounds sooo Rubensteinian. Theory comes
from
practice too.
In theory, bumblebees cannot fly.
Seems like a good moment to repost the Cottycam photo:
http://www.pbase.com/ccanuck/image/33130041
Cotty wrote:
Hey Fred. Just converted a K15mm 3.5 to EOS mount. Details soon ;-)
Hear, hear!
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Bill, why do you waste your time with JCO on this issue. The friggin
thread's been going on for a week or so, nothing's going to get thru to
JCO. He's busy talking theoretical hyperbole, you, Paul, and others are
talking about what's practical, realistic, and
That's certainly a nice price, even if it's not a great dslr.
Andreas Wirtz wrote:
look at:
http://new.dpnow.com/691a.html
Andreas
Which theory is that, Wheatfield ?
William Robb wrote:
In theory, bumblebees cannot fly.
mike wilson wrote:
Hi,
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I don't see it as unfair at all. See my most recent post. I think
JCO is
arguing on one level, others on a different level. Theory may be
fine, but
practical experience is paramount.
The nub of the matter, indeed. But to me it went like this:
You can put any price you want on an item that is an April Fool's joke...
keith
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
That's certainly a nice price, even if it's not a great dslr.
Andreas Wirtz wrote:
look at:
http://new.dpnow.com/691a.html
Andreas
Very nice shot. In some cities, lik Amsterdam, the windows in the red light
district look like this. Except it would be real women displayed:
http://www.fotokritik.dk/visstort.html?pic=65027
All the best
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig
Based on 19th century Victorian physics a honey bee cannot fly, it does
anyway so the theory had to be re-evaluated. We now build flying robots
based on the new theory. Wheatfield is just a bit behind.
Caveman wrote:
Which theory is that, Wheatfield ?
William Robb wrote:
In theory, bumblebees
This is my third week teaching at the Sixth Street Photography Workshop
(http://www.sixthstreetphoto.org) in San Francisco. It's a volunteer
position. I'm teaching a few basic photography classes and doing
some darkroom work for them, printing for an upcoming exhibition.
As with many non-profit
I can shoot totally manual too, even without a light
meter. What does that prove with regards to the subject?
Nothing. I was arguing open aperture TTL metering
is better than stop down TTL metering, not whether I
absolutely depended on either...Its an OPTIONAL feature,
an inferior OPTIONAL
Greetings,
I'm coming out of lurk mode to inquire about a site or book where I could
get an estimate on the current value of a lens? Specifically a SMC A*
200/F4 Macro ED (if anyone knows off the top of their head).
Any assistance would be appreciated.
Don
Hi!
ft When you're dull and boring like me, you try to make yourself seem
ft more interesting by hanging around interesting people. g
Frank, it is not your choice to decide whether above is correct. You
might want to consult your lawyer friend for proper explanation g...
Excellent site and
Added P.S. --
I have some 35mm film (36 exposure, Supra 400 Pro color neg.) that is
slightly out of date, but good stuff. Has always been refrigerated.
I'd be happy to send 6 or 8 rolls of that along too.
Lemme know.
keith
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
This is my third week teaching at the Sixth Street
- Original Message -
From: Don Herring
Subject: Lens Value
Greetings,
I'm coming out of lurk mode to inquire about a site or book where I
could
get an estimate on the current value of a lens? Specifically a SMC
A*
200/F4 Macro ED (if anyone knows off the top of their head).
You are crazy, Alan. But that doesn't mean you are not smart. You have
been complaining about that eyepiece for as long as I remember, now you
have fixed it. Way to go.
--
Alan Chan wrote:
Am I crazy or not? g
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan/pentax_z1p_custom_eyepiece
Alan Chan
Ah, that looks like one of those questionnaires that provide them with a
valuable, sellable, mailing list. I would not give my bank some of that
information.
--
mike.wilson wrote:
Hi,
Pentax appears to be collecting data on purchasers with a hook of
entering you for the cash prize draw.
Can
Yes, yes you can.
Keith Whaley wrote:
You can put any price you want on an item that is an April Fool's joke...
keith
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
That's certainly a nice price, even if it's not a great dslr.
No, in theory bumblebees can fly fine. The engineers just did not
understand some things that bumblebees did 50 years ago. Like the
fuzziness broke up the laminar airflow and reduced drag exponentially.
You ought to check out those hoary old cliches before using them, we
actually know a bit
It is a fake article. That is a Pentax 110 SLR in the photo.
--
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
That's certainly a nice price, even if it's not a great dslr.
Andreas Wirtz wrote:
look at:
http://new.dpnow.com/691a.html
Andreas
--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html
With this post I realized I should have been taking notes from this
thread. What a great bunch of ideas for photos for my press camera
website. Photos that would show both sides of this argument are nonsensical.
I think that no one is thinking here. It has just gotten to the point of
I'm right
Graywolf said:
With this post I realized I should have been taking notes from this
thread.
You could always do that from the archives -- a rainy day project, perhaps?
What a great bunch of ideas for photos for my press camera
website. Photos that would show both sides of this argument are
...and how to get some:
http://www.gettyartists.com/article.asp?article_id=720
Their main website is worth browsing: http://www.gettyimages.com
They also have a Central London gallery which I saw last week for the
first time. Some very interesting photos there - worth half a hour of
anybody's
I do wear glasses. The new glass eyepiece was made from the HOYA HMC SUPER
UV filter.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Do you wear glasses? What exactly is this mc
eyepiece. I couldn't tell from your gallery
shots.
John B
_
Here's a photograph I took this morning, right after sunrise (7:30 AM).
I enjoy making panoramas for my employer/work. I shot these (25 shots) in
RAW format with the *ist D and my SMC M*4/300mm. Then converted them to
JPEG's in Phase One SE (trial version) and stitched them together in Foto
Vista
I don't remember the exactly value, but if the body looks clean, it should
go for at least USD800+. I have a new tripod adaptor for this lens btw,
anyone wants it? Make me an offer.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I'm coming out of lurk mode to inquire about a site or book where I could
Working in the advertising biz, I've spent hundreds of hours searching
Getty. Good stuff. it's the number one rip-off source for art director
comps. Of course Getty knows that and they even help enable the ADs
with relatively high res samples. But Getty is also the number one
selling stock
I'm curious about all things photographic including
digital. Since I own nine 35mm Pentax lenses, seems
logical to check out the *ist D. While several have
been playing with the phrase; *ist D..what a
wonderful camera, I've also noted the many serious
praises.
Please help me understand what I read
Don,
I happily paid a list member $750 for one several years ago. This is a really rare
lens. I've seen it go for over $1,000 (US) on ebay in recent months.
I shot next month's (Oct'05) PUG contribution with it.
Regards, Bob S.
From: Don Herring
Subject: Lens Value
Greetings,
I'm
I've seen two SMCP-A* ED Macro 200/4 sell on eBay, and have not yet seen a
listing for one at any of the online stores I watch, including BH, KEH,
Adorama and many others. One of them sold on eBay in March 2003 and the
other in June 2004. Their sale prices are recorded on page 6 of the June
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 07:05:58 -0400, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To impress the chicks, man!
Well, it hasn't worked so far...
vbg
-theriault
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 23:08:50 +0200, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a photograph I took this morning, right after sunrise (7:30 AM).
I enjoy making panoramas for my employer/work. I shot these (25 shots) in
RAW format with the *ist D and my SMC M*4/300mm. Then converted them to
I would have thought that a maximum sensor shift of 1-2mm would be sensible to give
1-2 stops improvement. It's about 10% of the linear image dimension. Anything more
than this wouldn't be compensating for camera shake, it would be used for earthquake
stabilisation.
Nick
-Original
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:45:52 +0100, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is that the five minute relief, or the full half hour?
I paid for five minutes, but it didn't take nearly that long. rimshot
-knarf
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Click on the previous button and you'll get to the really good stuff
;-) ;-) ;-)
frank theriault wrote:
http://gallery46369.fotopic.net/p7816978.html
Sadly, the pano is so small on my screen, I can't really get an proper
idea of how it looks.
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:54:17 -0400 (EDT), CRB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have the themes for '05 been set yet?
Not that I've seen or heard.
HEY, LET'S PLAY A GAME!!!
I think that we should get going with some suggestions. That way
Adelheid will have something to work with (she'll only have
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 18:31:21 -0400, Caveman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Click on the previous button and you'll get to the really good stuff
;-) ;-) ;-)
Hey, now ~that's~ a great shot!!
Such vivid colours, great composition/framing, beautiful lady. What's
not to like? g
cheers,
frank
--
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 02:39:47 +1000, Ryan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Earlier this evening we had a super mini- BrisbanePDML, aka the Tanless
Evening (Tanya didn't show up because.. well, Tanya you
explain..).Nevertheless, more scrumptious (courtesy Jan Coyle, ta!) food for
the 3 of us (Tan,
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 02:04:12 -0600, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, If anyone on the list is living in, or near, Kelowna, BC, Canada,
could you please contact me offlist at:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks
William Robb
Left something behind at a bar?
vbg
-frank
--
Sharpness is a
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 22:26:22 -0600, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He's on leave.
WW
After the harrowing journey back from Afghanistan on one of our leaky,
rat-infested troop carriers, he deserves a vacation...
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri
the cost of the part would have been minimal, but the assembly line tooling
wouldn't have been. for a camera that has to cost Pentax at most $500 to
make, and probably under $400, a production run of well under 100K, on a
brand new line, when the company had lost money for 3 years in a row before,
Some good ideas here. I especially like the food gallery and the
anachronisms. I'm not much of a food photographer, but I'm very fond of
food :-).
Paul
On Sep 24, 2004, at 6:41 PM, frank theriault wrote:
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:54:17 -0400 (EDT), CRB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Have the themes for
Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is a fake article. That is a Pentax 110 SLR in the photo.
--
Hi Tom,
The article is probably fake, but the camera is a Zenit KM, or
at least almost identical to that.
See: http://www.rugift.com/photocameras/zenit_cameras.htm
and
frank theriault wrote:
Even in the midst of mass protest, the call for popular revolt and the
demand for the overthrow of our government, love will find a way
vbg:
They sure need a shampoo!
I remember a long time ago, when a drinkin' buddy and I used to visit a
couple of local pubs after work,
It's them Bell Sympatico acting again, their web hosting servers are
working with interruptions. I also get low transfer speed and extremely
poor name server services (I have to try 3-4 times until a name resolves).
Can anyone recommend me some reliable DSL service provider in Montreal
area ? I
Hi Keith
My email to you keeps bouncing. Seems I, or my ISP, are on your blocked
list. So, here's my response to your public and private email.
=
Hi Keith ...
What details do you need? What must I do to persuade you to part with a
camera or two?
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:54:04 -0700, Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They sure need a shampoo!
Apparently, hygene is a bourgeois concept, as well as sharpness. LOL
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Nice pic. Others (!) might have cropped it, but in fact the two faces
either side frame it well and reinforce the feeling of being in a crowd.
And I hate to use the F word, so I won't. There's no need.
Can't argue with his taste either!
John
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:36:24 -0400, frank
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:56:37 -0400, Caveman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's them Bell Sympatico acting again, their web hosting servers are
working with interruptions. I also get low transfer speed and extremely
poor name server services (I have to try 3-4 times until a name resolves).
Can
On 24 Sep 2004 at 19:51, Caveman wrote:
3 fps wouldn't be that bad, you go move a light then come back at the
camera and take a look etc question is can you do that without pressing
the shutter release and actually writing and filling up the memory card
?
That's 3fps without demosaicing,
Frank, you don't know how hard Ryan had to work to get that impression! It
was near midnight and I was definitely feeling like a GOM (grumpy old man,
for those who didn't work it out).
Tanja was sorely missed, but we'll be able to get together again next month,
she tells me - and at least she
That's what I thought when I first saw it, apparently Zenit copied the
Pentax 110 look for a modern 35mm model.
Graywolf wrote:
It is a fake article. That is a Pentax 110 SLR in the photo.
--
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
That's certainly a nice price, even if it's not a great dslr.
Andreas Wirtz
What was wrong with it?
JB
--- Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are crazy, Alan. But that doesn't mean you
are not smart. You have
been complaining about that eyepiece for as
long as I remember, now you
have fixed it. Way to go.
--
Alan Chan wrote:
Am I crazy or not? g
On 24 Sep 2004 at 14:33, Jack Davis wrote:
I'm curious about all things photographic including
digital. Since I own nine 35mm Pentax lenses, seems
logical to check out the *ist D. While several have
been playing with the phrase; *ist D..what a
wonderful camera, I've also noted the many
Alan,
So you actually got a Hoya SHMC uv filter and
modified it to fit?
JB
--- Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do wear glasses. The new glass eyepiece was
made from the HOYA HMC SUPER
UV filter.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Do you wear glasses? What exactly is this
Nice, Frank.
Joe
Had anyone seen how many A50/2.8 macros have been flooding though eBay of late?
I wonder why they have all come out of hiding of late? The imminent
introduction of the FAD50 macro perhaps?
In any case they seem to be going for a song, so if anyone wants a pointer to a
serious lens that works
On 24 Sep 2004 at 17:21, John Bailey wrote:
What was wrong with it?
It was a lovely high quality piece of plastic that scratches very easily and
needs to be cleaned often.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
