lol...
Bjørn is a good photographer, but he's basically trying out things
like that just for the heck of it.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2004 1:25 AM
Subject: Re: Macros at full aperture (was: Re: Quality of
John, thanks for the explanation.
Sometimes, we just have to take what is there!
Or not take the image at all.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO - Smokin' city
Ken, the occasion is unrepeatable, of course, as we seldom have
Well done. The shore line really sucks you in so to speak.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PAW - Lake Pukaki at Sunset
You're seeing this a day late as my ISP has been having server
problems...
I think the file could use a little
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 23:48:43 +1000, Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pick up the remote cord for the istD. It makes life much easier.
I would still need to hold down the button for the lens though. Thus
still requireing two hands.
But will it fit on the istD? :-)
Maris
Mishka wrote:
from a different list
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=3842947706category=30076
This one time, at band camp, Leon Altoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have mae up an adaptor for my double shutter release for use with my
bellows. Basically it's a micro switch in a box with a 2.5mm plug on
it to connect to the *istD. The release screws into a hole in the side
of the box
Thanks everyone for responding.
Yes, I we call this spider the kruisspin (Cross spider) here in the Netherlands.
You are correct, it was facing down, so I should rotate it 90 degrees.
I'll rotate it and crop it to make it symmetrical. It was moving out of the center of
the frame all the time
Chris Brogden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 10:18:16 -0400, Daniel Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also have not used a protector, nor have I noticed any problem.
Just wait until the paternity suits start coming. :)
So that's why everyone was referring to the Baby D.
--
I like this. A very narrow depth of field can lead to a very
interesting image.
Nice work.
Paul
On Oct 10, 2004, at 4:10 PM, Jostein wrote:
lol...
Bjørn is a good photographer, but he's basically trying out things
like that just for the heck of it.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From:
I agree. The blue coloration is an interesting touch. While it may look
more like dawn than sunset, it's a very nice image.
paul
On Oct 10, 2004, at 4:25 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Well done. The shore line really sucks you in so to speak.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: David
Looks like a Cotty project in the making...
On Oct 10, 2004, at 3:48 PM, Maris V. Lidaka Sr. wrote:
But will it fit on the istD? :-)
Maris
Mishka wrote:
from a different list
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?
ViewItemitem=3842947706category=30076
I've just taken my first look at what the Adobe DNG converter
does when you give it a Pentax PEF file from the *ist-D
First and foremost: the DNG converter doesn't preserve all the
Pentax-private data from the MakerNote tag (including, amongst
other things, the code identifying the lens mounted
Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mishka wrote:
from a different list
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?
ViewItemitem=3842947706category=30076
Looks like a Cotty project in the making...
He's working on a fitting for the Pentax 110.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
The list is back!
The list is back!
Looks like I missed the conversation about my model.
:)
Thanks to whomever for the energies expended. I know it's not easy.
This week I have to interface DB2 to Notes via DECS and generate some
suitable HTML/JS/CSS along with it.
So much fun, this blasted
On 10 Oct 2004 at 19:57, John Francis wrote:
Bottom line: this looks very much like a work in progress.
I'd expect to see a future release of the DNG converter
preserve more of the Pentax-specific information from the
MakerNote tag, and perhaps even use the same linearization
curve as the
Thanks John.
I had converted some of my PEF files to DNG for archiving. That seems
to be okay. But I was about to edfelete all my PEFs in favor of their
DNG counterparts. Now, thanks to your input, that sounds like a poor
choice. Thanks again for watching out for us.
Paul
On Oct 10, 2004, at
Could be, but that's not the error message I'd expect in that case. In
any case, it's available again, at least from my neck of the Internet
woods.
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 13:08:19 -0400, Graywolf wrote:
It worked fine when I looked at it yesterday. Now I can not connect. Perhaps we
ran him over
MG with M50/2 Working fine. Good condition. with original manual. $50
SMC Pentax-A 70-210/4. The good one. but it needs repairing. Aperture
won't close A pin spring missing. $20.
AF200T flash. Works fine. One spring needs cleaning from a battery
leak. Just use an emery board to scrape
John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just taken my first look at what the Adobe DNG converter
does when you give it a Pentax PEF file from the *ist-D
First and foremost: the DNG converter doesn't preserve all the
Pentax-private data from the MakerNote tag (including, amongst
other things,
Mark Roberts mused:
John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just taken my first look at what the Adobe DNG converter
does when you give it a Pentax PEF file from the *ist-D
First and foremost: the DNG converter doesn't preserve all the
Pentax-private data from the MakerNote tag
For those who, like me, participate in PDML through Mail-Archive.com.
As so many times before, I have subscribed temporarily to the digest.
Joe
-Forwarded Message-
From: Jeff Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Oct 10, 2004 3:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The Mail
I know I'm breaking the rules by posting this but I know how many of
you want to photograph something unique. This is your opportunity to get
a ghost on film! Not for the weak of wallet.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=1523item=5525211815rd=1
Oh, my. Look at how many have
On Oct 10, 2004, at 12:49 AM, William Robb wrote:
On the other hand, I am now cursed with having to go through almost 10
gigs of image files to see what I managed to accomplish.
At least the subject matter is pleasing...
Sid replies,
I'm sure I speak for many of the testosterone enabled
- Original Message -
From: jtainter
Subject: Fw: The Mail Archive on hold this week
For those who, like me, participate in PDML through
Mail-Archive.com.
As so many times before, I have subscribed temporarily to the
digest.
We love ya, Joe.
b...
Is that sorta like shoot 'em all, and let God sort 'em out!
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Sid Barras [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2004 10:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Shooting with the istD
On Oct 10, 2004, at 12:49 AM, William Robb wrote:
On the
On 10 Oct 2004 at 20:30, Joseph Tainter wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=1523item=5525211815rd=1
Oh, my. Look at how many have bid and how high the bidding has gone.
Just think -- the people who have bid on this are allowed to drive. They
are allowed to vote.
Actually I wonder if it's really worse than getting sucked in a FA 600
buy ;-)
Rob Studdert wrote:
Just save some money, I'm sure the following camera would negate your need for
the 600mm and just look how inexpensive it is :-)
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=3844857364
Hi everyone,
I know you purists will hate to hear this. But, I
just got thru shooting my family's Christmas card.
The beauty of digital, when working with 3 kids, 1
dog, and 1 cat is the ability to cut paste. I've
never done this before, but out of 50 some shots, of
course it was impossible
Hi aagin,
You probably rememeber that I'm giving some thought to
a macro lens. Was this a good deal:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=15240item=3844029025rd=1
???
Thanks!
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get
well... no.
the idea (as i understand it) behind DNG is to make pentax et al create the
proprietory converters, or, better yet, use DNG itself as a raw format.
the 3rd party (adobe in this case) raw-to-DNG converter is useful only as
a toy to give people some sense of what is should look and feel
I just did a little research (very little actually). The current fastest
supercomputer is made by IBM and just beat out NEC at 36.1 Tera-FLOPS (trillion
floating point opreations per second). Next year they will be delivering one
with almost 10 times that power. Even a little 1 cabinet Cray XD1
from another auction of that same seller:
GREAT ENTRE LEVEL GUITAR
-- just add cheese
mishka
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:43:46 +1000, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10 Oct 2004 at 20:30, Joseph Tainter wrote:
Just save some money, I'm sure the following camera would negate your need for
Isnt a MANUAL focus (only) lens preferrable for macro
rather than an AF lens used manually? Once again,
the DOF on Macro is very shallow and I don't think
you would want to rely on AF for that so a very smooth
Manual Focus would be very high on the list of features
you would want in a Macro lens
I think the idea behind it all is to have the camera makers
OUTPUT a DNG file only from the camera as the raw file. there would be
no point in outputting a propriatary RAW file from the camera and
then using special software to convert it to DNG later.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Mishka
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 23:38:54 -0400, Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just did a little research (very little actually). The current fastest
supercomputer is made by IBM and just beat out NEC at 36.1 Tera-FLOPS (trillion
floating point opreations per second).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] does twice
Just sit back and enjoy the security. That little 36.1 Tera-FLOP is
just a drop in the bucket compared to the amount of power it would take
to crack the 2048 code, much less the 4096 one. 36.1 Tera-FLOPS is
36.1 x 10^15 flops. If you remember that post before, if each quark in
the universe
Graywolf mused:
I just did a little research (very little actually). The current fastest
supercomputer is made by IBM and just beat out NEC at 36.1 Tera-FLOPS (trillion
floating point opreations per second). Next year they will be delivering one
with almost 10 times that power. Even a
- Original Message -
From: Steve Pearson
Subject: Digital is Awesome!
I figured out how to cut and paste
him from another photo where he was looking at the
camera, and I must say I'm pretty impressed with my
work. Digital is so cool!
I shot an obedience trial this past February, and
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Shooting with the istD
Is that sorta like shoot 'em all, and let God sort 'em out!
Pretty much.
It is way to easy to shoot way too many pictures with a DSLR.
At least with film, you have to stop more often.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Was this a good deal on a Sigma macro?
Isnt a MANUAL focus (only) lens preferrable for macro
rather than an AF lens used manually?
I don't have any experience witht eh lens pictured, but it looks to
have a decent focusing ring at
Gonz mused:
Just sit back and enjoy the security. That little 36.1 Tera-FLOP is
just a drop in the bucket compared to the amount of power it would take
to crack the 2048 code, much less the 4096 one. 36.1 Tera-FLOPS is
36.1 x 10^15 flops. If you remember that post before, if each
This one time, at band camp, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know if the istDs will take the same remote as the istD?
If so, it is a fairly safe bet that a new high end camera would as
well.
Also, is this the same remote as for the previous flagship, the MZ-S?
Kind regards
Or not.
Anyway, here is a random sampling of my escapade yesterday.
Before commenting cruelly, please consider that the girls are not
professional models, and the entire affair was somewhat
underorganized.
Also, these pictures are of young women wearing little (very little
in some pictures)
I guess if youre really paranoid, 2048 bits might be taking a risk at
some point. But I'm truly skeptical. 10^12 is a big factor. I suspect
that most of our computational performance is now going to come from
massive parallelism, and not processor frequency. We still have a
little room in
Just started to look but shouldn't that be When good things happen to
bad photographers?
William Robb wrote:
Or not.
Anyway, here is a random sampling of my escapade yesterday.
Before commenting cruelly, please consider that the girls are not
professional models, and the entire affair was
This is absolutely awesome, David. Beautiful work.
All the best
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: David Mann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 10. oktober 2004 05:52
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: PAW - Lake Pukaki at Sunset
46 matches
Mail list logo
