Caveman wrote:
http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/oz.html
Mutley snicker
LOL! love it!
annsan
There are a bunch of sample images posted on dpreview, most taken
with anti-shake enabled. Impressive stuff.
Should P come up with something similar and turn all those beloved K
lenses in image stabilized glass for the price of one *istd, you will
all be singing praise hymns. Don't
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
with body IS, you don't need a motor in the lens
at all and you only need one motor system, in the body.
The motion is the sensor and that is a lot smaller
and lighter than lens elements so the motor
should be smaller and lighter and quieter than lens
Well said, Chris...
I'm not only a low volume print user, but I wouldn't have a need for
even an 8x10 print except once in a blue moon!
11x14? 16x20 Forget it! Those are for salon displays... Maybe make a
couple of those per year!
So, chances are 5x7 is the largest print I'd usually want, and my
Don,
The Tamron 90 SP is a very good lens which now suits me also well on the
*istD so I take it along all the time as macro/ portrait/short tele. You
will find it is worth the money.
Here is example taken with it of a butterfly:
http://home.hccnet.nl/h.terhell/fotogallery/Insects/atlanta.jpg
I
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Mishka wrote:
Get an auto flash, and it will be as easy as TTL (esp. with
aperture-priority: you set the aperture on the flash and just shoot).
Well, almost. Used Vivitars and Sunpaks are pretty cheap.
I have a Sunpak flash from 1990. Is it possible to use it with the
jtainter wrote:
Adorama claims that my DA 14 shipped today.
Have I told the list how frustrated I have been by the wait for it?
You may have done so, once or twice... :-)
S
frank theriault wrote:
Other than the corny one of the person on the bench by the water, I
think they're all great shots. I might even be able to like that one
if I looked at it enough.
I remember voting in the round won by the photo you mention and being
astonished that it came top - I really
Oup, i want to sell it !
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stregevsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 12:36 AM
To: Pentax Discussion Group
Subject: Re: Sondage: fixe Lens for travel
Shen wrote: I have owned also a Konica auto S3 (rangefinder). it is small,
easy to
On Oct 14, 2004, at 1:16 AM, William Robb wrote:
Stenquist probably has a better idea of this than I do, but I bet that
most high end product photography is still being shot on large format
film.
As far as I've been able to determine, almost all advertising
photography is now digital. A lot
is that what Windows CE stand for?
mishka
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 22:15:15 -0400, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CE but you didn't hear it from me.
Bob Blakely wrote:
Right. What would be the new PC term for AD?
On 13/10/04, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Nice relaxed portrait. Looks like you were using a wide-ish lens?
Her legs seem somewhat distorted by the perspective to me. Not a
terribly big bother, but it is something that I noticed.
Or maybe you like it like that.
Thanks Frank.
On 13/10/04, Caveman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Mutley snicker
http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/cot1.jpg
;-)
You stalking me Cavo?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 13/10/04, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
My, what big teeth she has.
WW
LOL. She's too nice to be a journalist and in fact is retraining to
teach! Bless her.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 13/10/04, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Much tighter, much closer. Otherwise, I like it.
Thanks Paul.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 13/10/04, Keith Whaley, discombobulated, unleashed:
Should have used a longer lens, to get rid of the perspective problem of
making her feet look too big!
Indeed. The room was a bit small ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On 14/10/04, Caveman, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/oz.html
Mutley snicker
You're losing the plot mate.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Thursday, October 14, 2004, 1:08:11 AM, Alan wrote:
Anybody please knows about this specific lens, and how to get
inside? I don't want to experiment before trying to get information
first.
AC Don't know anything specific about this lens, but as with all Pentax AF
AC lenses, the brush
Hi, see below
WR It might have represented an unwelcome cost to the client.
WR Instead, I shot some 750 pictures. I didn't shoot a whole lot more
WR poses, but I got a lot of different expressions that I wouldn't have
WR got had I shot less (film).
WR This is value added for the client. They
Common Error ;-) ?
Thursday, October 14, 2004, 12:30:13 PM, Mishka wrote:
M is that what Windows CE stand for?
M mishka
M On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 22:15:15 -0400, Peter J. Alling
M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CE but you didn't hear it from me.
Bob Blakely wrote:
Right. What would be the new PC
PS Shen,
PS The S3 may be the best fixed-lens rangefinder ever made. Ultrahigh
PS resolution, small size, shutter priority, and an advanced, intelligent TTL
PS flash. The results should come close to the SMC 35/2 FA.
Hi Paul,
now you are overdoing it ;-) IT DOES NOT HAVE TTL FLASH. All it has is
Hi Paul,
more wrt to S3's flash, from a web review:
However, I find the S3 flash system quite bothersome at times. Since
you cannot set the aperture manually on the camera, you cannot
utilize auto modes and are forced to use your flash unit at full
power at its guide number (unless you have
Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
now you are overdoing it ;-) IT DOES NOT HAVE TTL FLASH. All it has is
flesh-o-matic
Man, I don't even want to *think* about what flesh-o-matic might be!
But I suspect it'll be the title of a new Caveman magazine shortly...
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and
I do not think that IS in a lens involves simply rotating
a lens , it involves moving a lens (mass) laterally.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Lawrence Kwan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 2:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Minolta Maxxum wth BODY IS
On
the motor size is going to depend on motor
power and the motor power required is going to
depend not simply on the amount of movement
but rather the acceleration of the moving masses
involved..
-Original Message-
From: J. C. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 14,
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 06:30:13 -0400, Mishka wrote:
is that what Windows CE stand for?
No, they chose CE because of the way it contracts: WinCE.
Personally, I have trouble trusting anything with an abbreviated name
of wince. :-)
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Minolta Maxxum wth BODY IS
I do not think that IS in a lens involves simply rotating
a lens , it involves moving a lens (mass) laterally.
And in body IS is not moving anything?
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Frantisek
Subject: Re: *ist D image quality-_Was -Stupid Question #999
Hi, see below
WR It might have represented an unwelcome cost to the client.
WR Instead, I shot some 750 pictures. I didn't shoot a whole lot
more
WR poses, but I got a lot of different
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Minolta Maxxum wth BODY IS
the motor size is going to depend on motor
power and the motor power required is going to
depend not simply on the amount of movement
but rather the acceleration of the moving masses
involved..
Well, it
I think someone needs to define advertising photography
and product photography because in my mind they are not
the same thing
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 6:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: *ist D
with body IS, a CCD/CMOS sensor is moving, but that has much lower mass
than
lens elements.
jco
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 8:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Minolta Maxxum wth BODY IS
- Original Message
No one said that lens IS doesn't work, of course it does, but someone
did say that the motors required for body IS where larger
and noiser than those for Lens IS which I don't
think is necessarily true...
JCO
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
Advertising photography is generally products shot by top-dollar pros
for magazine ads. Car photography is probably the most lucrative. Food
and fashion are important as well. Toys, guns, hardware, what have you.
All are advertised. All are photographed. Local advertising is
generally the work
Man, I don't even want to *think* about what flesh-o-matic might be!
Sounds like a new portrait mode on a Canon EOS (Electronically Over Specified)
LOL
John
-- Original Message ---
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 07:53:43 -0400
OK I finally got some sleep so I'm not quite so cranky today. ;-)
I'm glad to see this subject come up.
I was thinking the other day that all in all I spend MORE
time achieving a final print with digital then when I did it
all wet.
I do see however that being able to take more exposures without
This is an interesting point. I thought these shutters were rated for
about 100,000 or so. You could reach that a lot quicker with a DSLR.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
At this point, it's the concept that's being
considered. The ultimate desirability would,
obviously, follow the normal course of individual
evaluation.
I'm pleased there are the beginnings of a move to
develop the technology.
Jack
--- Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The thing here is no one
What do you print?
I rarely do contact prints from 35. It's fast enough to run the strip through the
enlarger and get quick 4x5s that are easier to evaluate.
Obvoiusly I don't do 4x5s from the big boy (2D). But of course the 4x5 gets contacts.
Sincerely,
C. Brendemuehl
Hi Folks: I know you do not hear much from me lately but I've been a little
preocupied with some medical problems that I have been trying to deal with. I
think I'll be leaving the list soon to concentrate on getting better...
I may be selling a lot of equipment soon.
Thanks Vic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/13/2004 1:21:56 AM
I am more worried about Camera Life.
I have shot 5000 shots in the 47 days, I have owned the *ist D. So,
I'm
keeping up my 100 shots a day rate in average. I sometimes wonder how
long
the camera will keep up :-)
I am wondering how you don't keep
Just curious.
Some people name their cars.
(But I'm not going to take this any further.)
Sincerely,
C. Brendemuehl
'Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have come to realize that
it bears a very close resemblance to the first.' Ronald
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2004/10/14 Thu PM 01:52:25 GMT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Leaving list for a while
Hi Folks: I know you do not hear much from me lately but I've been a little
preocupied with some medical problems that I have been trying to deal with. I
think I'll be
From: Collin Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2004/10/14 Thu PM 01:55:40 GMT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Do you name your cameras?
Just curious.
Some people name their cars.
(But I'm not going to take this any further.)
The names I call mine are not repeatable in public -
http://www.donkeydoesf1.co.uk/China%20Race%20Day/Dsc03496.jpg
--
Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike wrote:
And rather unlucky. If you find an adaptor for any of the (as far as I
can find out) custom Pentax fittings, be sure to let the list know. There
are rather a lot of us who will be wanting to do the same. Which is why
Pentax has made them themselves
Well, there may be hope
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2004/10/14 Thu PM 01:59:50 GMT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: Typical Canon shooter
http://www.donkeydoesf1.co.uk/China%20Race%20Day/Dsc03496.jpg
That must be one of those IS monopods that everyone is going on about. I can see how
it
Heheh, I should have read ahead before replying to Mike. Thanks for the
replies, guys. Michel, that's an excellent guide you put up there (and a
good excuse for me to brush up on my French ;-))!
Z.
At 19:18 13/10/04, Emiliano wrote:
-
I molded a plug for my ZX-50 with 2-component epoxy glue. I
Hope you get feeling better, Vic, and come back to see us.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Folks: I know you do not hear much from me lately but I've been a little
preocupied with some medical problems that I have been trying to deal with. I
think I'll be leaving the list soon to concentrate on
The whole site is friggin hilarious!!
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 09:59:50 -0400, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.donkeydoesf1.co.uk/China%20Race%20Day/Dsc03496.jpg
--
Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: The Diabolical Dr Z [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2004/10/14 Thu PM 02:00:29 GMT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Question about shutter release cables
Mike wrote:
And rather unlucky. If you find an adaptor for any of the (as far as I
can find out) custom Pentax fittings, be sure
To me, product photography (self-expalnitory)
is a smaller subset of advertising photography which could
be just about anything used in an ad. (i.e.stock)
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 9:00 AM
To: [EMAIL
From: Mat Maessen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2004/10/14 Thu PM 02:14:01 GMT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: Typical Canon shooter
The whole site is friggin hilarious!!
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 09:59:50 -0400, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mat Maessen wrote on 10/14/2004, 10:14 AM:
The whole site is friggin hilarious!!
http://www.donkeydoesf1.co.uk/China%20Race%20Day/Dsc03496.jpg
Apparently the Jaguar F1 mechanics are a bit pissed off with Ford for
pulling out of F1
One of my favs:
I kind of though shutter MTBF was rated at about 50K cycles on amateur cameras
and 100-150K cycles on serious pro cameras. Of course MTBF (mean time before
failure) like most statistics has no meaning when applied to an individual
camera. Nor does it say anything about when the shutter will
Yeah, they were actually ordered to remove the donkey from the pits as
it 'lowered the tone', but as Ford had already announced their decision
the crew gave them the two fingers!
-Original Message-
From: Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 October 2004 15:25
To: [EMAIL
Best of luck, Vic. Hope you feel better soon. Looking forward to seeing you back here.
Paul Stenquist
Hi Folks: I know you do not hear much from me lately but I've been a little
preocupied with some medical problems that I have been trying to deal with. I
think I'll be leaving the list soon
Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I kind of though shutter MTBF was rated at about 50K cycles on amateur cameras
and 100-150K cycles on serious pro cameras. Of course MTBF (mean time before
failure) like most statistics has no meaning when applied to an individual
camera. Nor does it say
Id hate to think what it costs to have the shutter
repaired/replaced in a DSLR but it does bring up
a good point, exposures on a DSLR are not really free.
although the cost per exposure is very very low, I
wouldn't want the premature downtime needed to have the camera
serviced due to a worn out
Frantisek wrote:
PS Shen,
PS The S3 may be the best fixed-lens rangefinder ever made. Ultrahigh
PS resolution, small size, shutter priority, and an advanced, intelligent TTL
PS flash. The results should come close to the SMC 35/2 FA.
Hi Paul,
now you are overdoing it ;-) IT DOES NOT HAVE TTL
Recently i renamed the D2h from Cynthia to ...%^##^*(*$%^ digital camera .
The 6x7 is Mrs CLUuNKvbg
Dave
Just curious.
Some people name their cars.
(But I'm not going to take this any further.)
Sincerely,
C. Brendemuehl
Hi everybody,
It seems like years since last time I did contribute to the
list.
I hope the following link will fill a bit this gap:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=438541
I don't know why, but the pics are in the wrong order (has it
something to do with the new layout of
Put your dog back in his kennel, Cot!
keith g
Cotty wrote:
On 14/10/04, Caveman, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www3.sympatico.ca/vdonisa/oz.html
Mutley snicker
You're losing the plot mate.
Cheers,
Cotty
Architectural photography is still being done with 4x5 chrome. It
depends on the quality you think you need.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Oct 14, 2004, at 1:16 AM, William Robb wrote:
Stenquist probably has a better idea of this than I do, but I bet
that most high end product photography is still
First, do what you need, to get well.
Much good luck in the meanwhile,
keith whaley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Folks: I know you do not hear much from me lately but I've been a little
preocupied with some medical problems that I have been trying to deal with. I
think I'll be leaving the list
I can't come up with a better one.
Frantisek wrote:
Common Error ;-) ?
Thursday, October 14, 2004, 12:30:13 PM, Mishka wrote:
M is that what Windows CE stand for?
M mishka
M On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 22:15:15 -0400, Peter J. Alling
M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CE but you didn't hear it from me.
Bob
Cotty wrote:
On 13/10/04, Keith Whaley, discombobulated, unleashed:
Should have used a longer lens, to get rid of the perspective problem of
making her feet look too big!
Indeed. The room was a bit small ;-)
Heh, heh...most suggestions of this type require knocking a hole in the
wall
If he hadn't thought of it, why did you have to give him the idea?
Mark Roberts wrote:
Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
now you are overdoing it ;-) IT DOES NOT HAVE TTL FLASH. All it has is
flesh-o-matic
Man, I don't even want to *think* about what flesh-o-matic might be!
But I suspect
Johns probably right, it's bound to be a single lens but a lens group
being moved vs the sensor. Probably a considerably larger mass in the
lens elements.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: J. C. O'Connell Subject: RE:
Minolta Maxxum wth BODY IS
I do not think that IS in
Hi Don,
I'm not sure you'll see much, if any, difference in the end result, but I'm
just now starting to explore the possibilities and pitfalls of converting
RAW files, so it's very possible I'm talking through my hat ...
If I were you, I'd not pay for the upgrade to PS CS until you're sure
So, while one saves a few bucks on film, much more time can be spent
editing and correcting the work. Then, really, is there that much of a
savings (just talking about $$ v time, nothing to do with quality, etc.).
I can see this as being less of an issue for some bigshot pro who's billing
a
No. They already have names: Pentax, Canon, Leica, Kodak. I don't think a
camera gets the same response as a car, although that Ferrari Olympus
digital would go good with my dream car.
Jim A.
From: Collin Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004
Well, duh...
(But in the words of a former president, I feel your pain.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Collin Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2004/10/14 Thu PM 01:55:40 GMT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Do you name your cameras?
Just curious.
Some people name their cars.
(But I'm not going
Just remember any publicity is good publicity.
Christian wrote:
http://www.donkeydoesf1.co.uk/China%20Race%20Day/Dsc03496.jpg
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings
and shoot foreigners - two things that are
On 13 Oct 2004 at 21:47, Don Sanderson wrote:
Am I simply not experienced enough yet in processing digital
or am I REALLY expecting a 6MP digital to rival film when this
is an unrealistic expectation?
I find the *istD image quality quite acceptable overall. If one feels that
film often does
Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't come up with a better one.
Cormorant Enabled
Frantisek wrote:
Common Error ;-) ?
Thursday, October 14, 2004, 12:30:13 PM, Mishka wrote:
M is that what Windows CE stand for?
M mishka
M On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 22:15:15 -0400, Peter J. Alling
M
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
So, while one saves a few bucks on film, much more time can be spent
editing and correcting the work. Then, really, is there that much of a
savings (just talking about $$ v time, nothing to do with quality, etc.).
I can see this as being less of an issue for some
I know. I'll try to learn to shoot a little less. The reason I'm shooting
this much is, that I use my camera at work some times. Image editing after
the shooting takes too much of of my time...
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra:
I have yet to experience any kind of annoying slowdown running PSCS. All operations
seem virtually instantaneous. Scratch disk allocation is a big part of the equation. I
have a 200 gig firewire drive that is almost empty as my first scratch disk. I have
1.5 gig of ram with 70% of it allocated
Before going digital, I had gotten to the point where my two major clients --
magazines and stock -- were insisting on digital files. So I had resorted to scanning
medium format. That was both very expensive and very time consuming. Digital was the
obvious solution.
So, while one saves a few
C. Brendemuehl asked:
Just curious.
Some people name their cars.
(But I'm not going to take this any further.)
I've been known to name cars, but not cameras.
ERN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Folks: I know you do not hear much from me lately but I've been a little
preocupied with some medical problems that I have been trying to deal with.
I
think I'll be leaving the list soon to concentrate on getting better...
I may be selling a lot of
Working on a Mac may have something to do with it, but it just occurred to
me that file size may play a big part in the equation. Many of the files
I'm working with are 120mb (4000ppi, 16bit color). When working with
smaller file sizes (40mb BW for example, 11mb TIFFs from the Sony camera)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mused:
From: Mat Maessen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2004/10/14 Thu PM 02:14:01 GMT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: Typical Canon shooter
The whole site is friggin hilarious!!
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 09:59:50 -0400, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My *istD conversions come out at 144 meg, 26-bit, but I do most of the work in the RAW
converter where they are much smaller. After conversion I generally do very little
other than rotation and crop.
Working on a Mac may have something to do with it, but it just occurred to
me that file size
If you are a pro you just charge for post-production work. If you spend 2 hours
shooting a job, then 6 hours at the computer, and only charge for 2 hours you
are a fool and deserve to be paid poorly. Admittedly when faced with post
production charges many editors say they just want to see the
Related to this...
Top level outdoor nature photogs in the USA are gradually going totally digital
capture. I've seen first hand the prints several of these pros are producing selling
with 6 8 meg cameras the images are truly magnificant. I've not seen side by side
comparisons of the same
Hi,
If you feel up to it, try working with one of those 144mb files ... see how
long it takes to call it up, make some adjustments, play around with a few
layers. I'd be curious to know how much slower, if at all, the process is
for you with larger files.
Shel
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Hi all. It's Nick Wright here. I used to be very
active on this list a couple years back. I've just
kinda been lurking around the archives lately. It's
good to see so many of the same old faces around here.
Most groups have such a large rate of turnover that
you couldn't be gone for so long and
I will. I also have quite a few 270 meg 16-bit files from medium format scans. I don't
remember having a problem with them, but perhaps I just adjusted to the speed. I'll
have to drag some of them out again and play with them. I have a couple that I want to
print anyway.
Paul
Hi,
If you
I still do contact sheets for all formats. 8x10 usually. An entire
roll of 120 film (shot 6x6 or 6x4.5 at least) will fit onto a sheet of
8x10 paper, as will 4 4x5 negatives, and most of a roll of 35mm film.
Once the contact sheets are done, out comes the marker, and I circle
the ones I want to
Hear, hear... ;-)
John Whittingham wrote:
Man, I don't even want to *think* about what flesh-o-matic might be!
Sounds like a new portrait mode on a Canon EOS (Electronically Over Specified)
LOL
John
-- Original Message ---
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
None of my cameras have earned names yet, but my Mini is named
Winifred, or Winnie Cooper, for short.
-Mat
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004, Graywolf wrote:
If you are a pro you just charge for post-production work. If you spend
2 hours shooting a job, then 6 hours at the computer, and only charge
for 2 hours you are a fool and deserve to be paid poorly.
Of course that's what any pro will do, but it begs the
On 14/10/04, Collin Brendemuehl, discombobulated, unleashed:
Just curious.
Cars, yes. Cameras, no.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
I can't come up with a better one.
Caveman Endoscopy.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 14/10/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Hi Folks: I know you do not hear much from me lately but I've been a little
preocupied with some medical problems that I have been trying to deal
with. I
think I'll be leaving the list soon to concentrate on getting better...
I may be
On 14/10/04, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.donkeydoesf1.co.uk/China%20Race%20Day/Dsc03496.jpg
LOL!!
Very funny :-/
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Just curious.
Heard of a guy who named his zoom Google. Probably because he was
always on the search for pr0n.
Yep, it reads England too ;-)
Cotty wrote:
On 14/10/04, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.donkeydoesf1.co.uk/China%20Race%20Day/Dsc03496.jpg
LOL!!
Very funny :-/
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Mat Maessen mused:
None of my cameras have earned names yet, but my Mini is named
Winifred, or Winnie Cooper, for short.
We don't name ours, but we do take holiday pictures of it.
http://panix.com/~johnf/temp/DesertPass.jpg
http://panix.com/~johnf/temp/LowPoint.jpg
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo
