On 11/11/04, Ronald Arvidsson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sounds like what I want. Weight is not a problem - its more if its
convenient to work with and there big lenses do differ. Some being
outright awkward but I think from your description this is what I want.
I'm not quite small myself,
On 11/11/04, Bruce Dayton, discombobulated, unleashed:
Ok, we are swinging back to Monterey and the 17 mile drive for this
one. Part of the same trip as the other two.
Pentax *istD, Sigma 55-200/3.5-5.6 DC, Handheld
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/pinnacles_0085.htm
Wickedly good. Jeees Bruce
But, but, but -- they aren't rabbits! ;)
I won't say anymore - except LOL :)
ann
Rob Studdert wrote:
Been a bit busy lately, haven't posted anything for a while, so here goes:
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~audiob/temp/IMGP8123.jpg
*ist D, A15/3.5
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE
The thought of you being full of Bill's cigars well it's just too, too,
too...
Simile fails me.
Cotty wrote:
On 11/11/04, Ronald Arvidsson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sounds like what I want. Weight is not a problem - its more if its
convenient to work with and there big lenses do differ.
... and I'm not talking about cameras! (Though it is about photography)
I just spotted a post on another discussion group I read, where somebody
was recounting his experience with a nice little multi-function printer/
scanner from HP. When you put a memory card from a digital camera into it,
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 08:12:49 -0800
Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
apart from a friend dropping one of
my Leicas and needing to replace the rangefinder unit
does this 'friend' sleep with the fishes?
Typical problems with digital.
* All images need retouching as skin tones are poor.
*
I'm able to use the AF400T with the *istD on TTL. Good exposures are no problem
at ISO 400.
I find that the *istD records skin tones quite accurately. I shoot RAW and
adjust color temperature as necessary. I have never tried shooting tiff or
jpeg, so I can't speak to that.
I have shown *istD
Yep, I bought one for my 13 year old. He can print the pictures from his
Optio S4 without needing a computer or software. It produces acceptable
quality 8 x 10 prints from a 4MP camera, .jpg file, at the default
settings.Acceptable for a 13 year old or anyone that is not super
critical.
Excellent! Finally I see the song's true meaning. vbg Thanks.
Pat White
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Cotty wrote:
On 11/11/04, Ronald Arvidsson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sounds like what I want. Weight is not a problem - its more if its
convenient to work with and there big lenses do differ. Some being
outright awkward but I think from your description this is what I
I received Pentax A70-210/4 from ebay seller (Powerseller, 11000
feedback, 99.6% positive). It was described as optically MINT-,
without fungus.
The front elements contain many white dots - here is the picture:
http://www.pepek.sk/fp/a70-210.jpg and detail here:
Peter Belak wrote:
Would you say the description (opt. MINT-) was OK?
Absolutely not.
/Henri
http://www.photo.net/gc/view-one?classified_ad_id=593906
Sincerely,
C. Brendemuehl
'Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have come to
realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first.' Ronald Reagan
Since some of y'all be talkin loung lense stuf
(That's Okie. Translation available on request)
PENTAX AF LENSES
Tamron 300 f2.8 SP AF LD IF w/112mm Tamron UV filter, tripod collar, caps and
hood, 9+ $849
Just that silly monster filter is worth bunch.
Sincerely,
C. Brendemuehl
On 11/11/04, Peter Belak, discombobulated, unleashed:
I received Pentax A70-210/4 from ebay seller (Powerseller, 11000
feedback, 99.6% positive). It was described as optically MINT-,
without fungus.
The front elements contain many white dots - here is the picture:
The only problem I have had is that when I first got the camera it
failed to read the aperture setting electronically on several of my FA
lenses. This problem went away after about a week. I suspect that
despite all my cleaning attempts, some coating on one of the contacts
had to wear off.
- Original Message -
From: Peter Belak
Subject: Is this fungus?
The front elements contain many white dots - here is the picture:
http://www.pepek.sk/fp/a70-210.jpg and detail here:
http://www.pepek.sk/fp/a70-210_detail.jpg
Is it fungus? I have never seen this before..
It looks more
- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
Subject: Re: Concerns About Moving to Digital (Quality of istD)
What I did not see in your list (and I am only mentioning it just
in
case) is how problematic dust is/is not with the *ist-D/DSLRs.
Perhaps you don't mind the issue, I just
- Original Message -
From: Peter J. Alling
Subject: Re: Concerns About Moving to Digital (Quality of istD)
Many of these problems are typical of all DSLR or Digital cameras
in general or digital equipment in
general. Software is pounded out and often not properly tested.
The rush to
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: Over to the Dark side.. ist D vs 20D brief comparison
I think the *ist D is a beautiful and well-crafted piece of kit.
But am I
the only one on the planet who doesn't like it's small size? I love
the
weight and size of bigger bodies. (cue
- Original Message -
From: Keith Whaley
Subject: Re: *ist D Anomalies
Heh, heh...You're way sharper than I thought you were!
Phaff.
William Robb
Peter... Whatever it is, it's nasty and you don't want it near your other
gear. Run (don't walk) to your computer and demand a full immediate refund,
plus shipping charges. That's certainly not MINT-.
I got a lens last month that looked like it had been stuffed with cotton! I
was fortunate that
Fungus is *usually* more spiderwebby, this looks more like the worst
case of element seperation I've ever seen.
Whatever it is it's horrible!
Demand ALL your money, including ALL shipping, back.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Peter Belak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
Do you ever find that the LX overexposes by trying to lighten up all
that dark sky?
Chris
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:19:42 +0200, Antti-Pekka Virjonen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
You're not going to get any reading with a normal
spotmeter... unless the Aurora is extremely bright
(but then
Ahh yes. The dangers of actually meeting another PDML member in the flesh.
;)
Tom C.
Heh, heh...You're way sharper than I thought you were!
Phaff.
William Robb
Hi,
I bought the FA* 80-200/2.8 a couple of weeks ago. So
far I am very pleased with it and an I can second
everything John Francis said about this lens.
Also, if this is important for you, I think it is one
of the very few zoom lenses that have a good bokeh.
That was the ultimate reason why I
Which lens(es) did you decide on, and why?
Chris
On 11 Nov 2004 22:30:06 +0100 (CET), michal mesko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
I have saved a little money and am thinking of buying some neat wideangle
lens. Since Pentax does not seem to be very popular in Finland (at least not
in
according to www.spaceweather.com
They even have some shots from Australia, you guys and girls down there.
Also look at http://www.sec.noaa.gov/SWN/index.html for additional info.
Tom C.
Hi list,
I have saved a little money and am thinking of buying some neat wideangle lens.
Since Pentax does not seem to be very popular in Finland (at least not in
Tampere), I will have to mail-order.
Does anybody from Europe have an experience with buying used lens from KEH? How
about the
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2873096size=lg
På 5. nov. 2004 kl. 10.30 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I had so many Red photos (and I know I didn't PUG the easiest one)
that I've decided to PESO some of them as well.
Here's the first of them:
Woo hoo! Good stuff.
Chris
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 23:53:47 +1100, Anthony Farr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/2ja75
Enjoy :-)
regards,
Anthony Farr
I think the *ist D is a beautiful and well-crafted piece of kit.
But am I
the only one on the planet who doesn't like it's small size? I love
the
weight and size of bigger bodies. (cue WW)
On 11/11/04, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
You probably like getting spanked too.
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 20:56:21 +
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/11/04, Kevin Waterson, discombobulated, unleashed:
I have been asked by the local art gallery to produce a range of images for
display, and these will all be done in black and white and the 6x7. I cannot
imagine even
Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Canon is the Evil empire, they are cleaning Nikon's clock, eating their
lunch, kicking Nikon's dog, (I seem to have run out of inappropriate
metaphors, oh well).
Metaphors or no, you've got it right. I've tried out a D2h and it's
certainly a wonderful
Peter Belak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I received Pentax A70-210/4 from ebay seller (Powerseller, 11000
feedback, 99.6% positive). It was described as optically MINT-,
without fungus.
The front elements contain many white dots - here is the picture:
http://www.pepek.sk/fp/a70-210.jpg and detail
On 11/11/04, Peter J. Alling,
discombobulated,
unleashed:
I'm sure the Canon and Nikon
forums have just as many complaints.
I am on the D1 BB and the Nikonians web site a fair amount,simply because i
have the Nikon
DSLR's
and read the comments
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 17:40:35 -0500, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Canon is the Evil empire, they are cleaning Nikon's clock, eating their
lunch, kicking Nikon's dog, (I seem to have run out of inappropriate
metaphors, oh well).
Metaphors or
So... uh... where are the brakes? And the kickstand? ;)
Chris
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 18:57:45 -0500, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll say more about it later, but I will say that's my Rossin Track
Bike in the foreground. Comments are always welcome:
Frank's bike don't need no steenkeeng brakes! Looks like it's got none.
Nice bike, I bet it's very light.
Pat White
As any software designer/programmer knows, the user can always find a way to
beat the system!
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 1:43 AM
Subject: Re: *ist D Anomalies
It's interesting
For anyone interested in USA or Canada, that's interested in Photoshop at a
'reasonable' price, $374.99, I came across this:
http://www.edirectsoftware.com/photoshopCS-Bundle.html
Tom C.
I've been messing with some street stuff - this time shooting completely
blind. Intro and 12 pics here
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/photoessays/essays/hip.html
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Odd. I enjoy printing monochrome pics from col digital masters.
I enjoy making 30x40 prints in the darkroom :)
Touche!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 11/11/04, Pat White, discombobulated, unleashed:
Frank's bike don't need no steenkeeng brakes! Looks like it's got none.
Nice bike, I bet it's very light.
It doesn't need a seat either or so I gather
:-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Cotty wrote:
I've been messing with some street stuff - this time shooting completely
blind. Intro and 12 pics here
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/photoessays/essays/hip.html
Cheers,
Cotty
When you shoot completely blind, you might consider raising yor shutter
speed to ¼ second or so...
Cotty,
Very cool! It does give you a very different feel and perspective. I
hope that you'll keep working on this project and continue to share it
with us. I very much enjoyed the look see.
Thanks,
Bruce
Thursday, November 11, 2004, 3:23:48 PM, you wrote:
C I've been messing with some
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 19:06:56 +, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a forwarded message
===8==Original message text===
Dear Friends,
Magnum Photos is looking to fill the position of Editorial Assistant. In
short it is to liaise on the editorial front for all
I didn't assume it, I stipulated it!
I said DIGITAL IMAGES. Unscanned negatives
are not digital images
There is a difference between stipulation
and assumption.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 6:53 PM
To: [EMAIL
While looking through some old photos of cameras I've owned, I found
that one of them has somehow become corrupted. I have no idea what
caused it or how to fix it, so I'm open to any ideas or suggestions.
It's of a black Pentax S that I no longer own, and I'd love to have
the picture restored.
I'm off to Chicago for the weekend!
My S.O. has a conference there and I'm coming along for the ride. One of
the medical companies that's trying to woo all the docs into giving them
their business is putting on a party at the House of Blues on Saturday
night, so we're going to have some fun!
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 23:31:27 +, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't need a seat either or so I gather
They're calling me Falsetto Frank nowadays...
g
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/11/04, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
When Canon announced the 1D-II I was sorely tempted. 8 megapixels is
very attractive and I'd settle for the 1.3x FOV crop over full-frame,
considering the price difference. But thing's simply too enormous for
I have also bought from KEH a few times and am very satisfied, and had them
ship to Iceland via UPS. It took 3-4 days. The lenses have been better than I
thought they would be and I've only once had a small problem. That was when I
ordered a cheap Cokin filter along with a lens, but the filter
On Nov 11, 2004, at 6:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think your right here.
Nikon sems to have a bad customer service attitude(which i just found
out myself)and Canon
seems to
have a more owner friendly attitude to comments on the products.
Also i think Canon stands out more in public,with
Hello DagT,
I always like photos that challenge my perspective. This is one of
them. It causes me to keep looking and understanding what is in the
image. Well done, to see and capture this wonder.
Thanks,
Bruce
Thursday, November 11, 2004, 1:54:31 PM, you wrote:
D
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: John Francis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 10. november 2004 22:39
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: eBay silliness
David Nelson mused:
A used FA* 85mm f/1.4 just went on eBay for $810
On 11/11/04, Chris Brogden, discombobulated, unleashed:
While looking through some old photos of cameras I've owned, I found
that one of them has somehow become corrupted. I have no idea what
caused it or how to fix it, so I'm open to any ideas or suggestions.
It's of a black Pentax S that I no
I´ve bought from KEH delivered with Fedex or UPS to Norway, and was
very happy with the result. The lens was like new minus, which meant
that it had a fingerprint on the outside of the lens cap. It took much
less time that ordering from Sweden (Scandinavian Photo).
You may get a better deal
I love the bus shot! It's a bit busy on the right, which I find
needlessly distracting, but everything else is great. The longer I
look at it the more things I see.
Chris
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 22:54:31 +0100, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's horrible! I can't tell if it's fungus or lens element
separation, but you need to get a complete refund ASAP. As the lens
has been grossly misrepresented, I'd try to get your shipping both
ways refunded, too.
Ask the seller if he sent you the wrong lens. If he's selling that
many items,
Actually, I kinda like the darker gray area at the top. Balances out
the water nicely, and calls attention to the lighter sky by framing
it. Almost like Michaelangelo's painting of The Last Supper. You
know... the fat one balancing the two skinny ones. ;)
Chris
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:06:01
That was funnier than 96% of the posts on this list! :)
Chris
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:38:25 -0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like 47% of all statistics he made them up.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Thanks for posting this. Your figures seem odd. With only 10 replies, how
do
Comments in text
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 10:46 AM
To: PDML
Subject: Over to the Dark side.. ist D vs 20D brief comparison
So, time to make the announcement. After returning my ist D, I now find
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob, do you have an in at Magnum? Could you put in a good word for me?
Oh damn. I was gonna try for that job, but there's no point if Frank's
applying...
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Shel, my experience with the *istD has been very problem-free. On one
occasion I was getting weird results, but found that one of my
grand-daughters, who had been insisting on holding Papa's camera, had nudged
the dial off 'P' and on to 'M' without my realising. Other than that and
the flash
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 22:54:31 +0100, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2873096size=lg
På 5. nov. 2004 kl. 10.30 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I had so many Red photos (and I know I didn't PUG the easiest one)
that I've decided to PESO some of them as
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 19:16:32 -0500, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh damn. I was gonna try for that job, but there's no point if Frank's
applying...
Aw, go ahead, Mark. I don't have a current passport (remember? g).
If they want me for an
Wow... The only chance for that lens to be MINT is if the dots are
sprayed on with mint cream aka After Eight.
I've never seen a lens with element separation, so I wouldn't know the
difference, but there are fungi with growing patterns like that too.
Anyways, it's certainly a full refund case!
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 19:12:57 -0500, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip. I don't have a current passport (remember? g).snip
I mean, sweet-talking my way across the border on the Midnight Bus to
Pittsburg (feel free to hum along...) is one thing, but I don't think
all the making nice in
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 19:13:22 -0500, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm off to Chicago for the weekend!
My S.O. has a conference there and I'm coming along for the ride. One of
the medical companies that's trying to woo all the docs into giving them
their business is putting on a party
Hi,
Bob, do you have an in at Magnum?
as if...
Could you put in a good word for me?
(as if...)
g
Since Hank's shutter finally closed they've been looking for a
photographer who can't focus. And Frank rhymes with Hank, so hey -
you're in with a chance!
--
Cheers,
Bob
In my opinion, the *istD is too new (what is it about a 1.5 yr old?)
to make judgements regarding its long term reliabiliy. ( sorry for
stating the obvious, duh).
While some have
probably already been worked real hard in terms of number of exposures,
there is always the issue of aging of
Today's Atlanta Journal-Constitution newspaper included a sales flyer
from Wolf Camera. It includes an advertisement for the *ist D with
Pentax 18-55 zoom for $999.99 (or $999.95). That's the best price I've
seen so far from a reasonably reputable dealer.
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 19:13:22 -0500, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm off to Chicago for the weekend!
My S.O. has a conference there and I'm coming along for the ride. One of
the medical companies that's trying to woo all the docs into giving
It looks like salt, (NaCl), crystals/stains to me.
Peter Belak wrote:
I received Pentax A70-210/4 from ebay seller (Powerseller, 11000
feedback, 99.6% positive). It was described as optically MINT-,
without fungus.
The front elements contain many white dots - here is the picture:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:08:52 -, Rob Brigham wrote:
[...] felt like it was bespoke built for me [...]
Ok, this is probably one of those American English versus H.M.
English things. I've seen the term bespoke used in this way before,
usually in reference to clothes. It has always sounded
whatever it is, get a refund. complain to ebay. if you paid with paypal,
complain to them. this is a clear misrepresentation. it's going to take time,
but there's a good chance you'll get your money back (i've been in a
very similar
situation).
best,
mishka
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 21:35:19 +0100,
Them wimpie Canadians wouldn't know how to spank someone...
Cotty wrote:
I think the *ist D is a beautiful and well-crafted piece of kit.
But am I
the only one on the planet who doesn't like it's small size? I love
the
weight and size of bigger bodies. (cue WW)
On 11/11/04, William
Thank you very much, I'm here all week.
Chris Brogden wrote:
That was funnier than 96% of the posts on this list! :)
Chris
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:38:25 -0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like 47% of all statistics he made them up.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Thanks for posting
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 19:12:57 -0500, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip. I don't have a current passport (remember? g).snip
I mean, sweet-talking my way across the border on the Midnight Bus to
Pittsburg (feel free to hum along...) is one
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 21:58:49 +, Cotty wrote:
Is that the North American Spank or the full-on Canadian spank?
So the Canadians finally did secede from North America? :-)
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
I'd like to see that...
Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/11/04, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
When Canon announced the 1D-II I was sorely tempted. 8 megapixels is
very attractive and I'd settle for the 1.3x FOV crop over full-frame,
considering the price
That's something of a left handed compliment
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes.
I haven't found the *ist D to have more or less problems than a regular
electronic body film SLR.
Hi,
Ok, this is probably one of those American English versus H.M.
English things. I've seen the term bespoke used in this way before,
usually in reference to clothes. It has always sounded like it means
something along the lines of custom tailored. But I've never found
an (American
Remember a Canadian spank is only about 62% of an American spank - they're
into metric remember.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 7:44 PM
Subject: Re: Over to the Dark side.. ist D vs 20D
Hi,
Them wimpie Canadians wouldn't know how to spank someone...
I heard they like to spank their monkeys though.
--
Cheers,
Bob
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 01:37:32 +0200, Lasse Karlsson wrote:
http://www.mts.net/~cbrodgen/s1.jpg
I have assumed that information simply is irrepairably lost (maybe some
clusters got tangled up with some other file which stole the bits that
now are missing).
That's too small a corruption to
One of the offset bytes is corrupted, I have no idea how to fix it.
Chris Brogden wrote:
While looking through some old photos of cameras I've owned, I found
that one of them has somehow become corrupted. I have no idea what
caused it or how to fix it, so I'm open to any ideas or suggestions.
Probably makes an excellent soft-focus lens. Just looking on the bright
side.
Tom C.
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Is this fungus?
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 17:23:34 -0500
Peter Belak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I received
Brilliant! You've just figured out how to turn an $8000 camera into a
Lomo. vbg
Seriously, I like these a lot. They're refreshing in their
alternative perspective and sheer vibrancy. IOW, they're a bit o' all
right.
Chris
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 23:23:48 +, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been looking for a decent A type 35mm to use as a normal lens on the D.
I understand the A35/2.8 is pretty soft wide open but does anyone know how
it
is otherwise?
I have a nice K 35/3.5 but want something to use in P or Av mode for every-
day quick snaps.
TIA
Don
Hi Team,
I've recently exchanged my X-Drive II for a Compact Drive PD7X. This unit is
pretty inexpensive, it's about US$30 more than the X-Drive II but it offers a
few significant advantages.
It copies media to the local HDD at 4x the speed of the X-Drive, it verifies
the transfer, it displays
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 23:23:48 +, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been messing with some street stuff - this time shooting completely
blind. Intro and 12 pics here
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/photoessays/essays/hip.html
Cotty, you're full o' crap!
You only ~think~ you're
Hmmm... hadn't thought of that. Spent a good afternoon trying to wipe
the purple marker off my monitor, though. ;)
Chris
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 23:27:19 +, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/11/04, Chris Brogden, discombobulated, unleashed:
While looking through some old photos of
From: Chris Brogden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 1:04 AM
Subject: Help with damaged photo file
While looking through some old photos of cameras I've owned, I found
that one of them has somehow become corrupted. I have no idea what
caused it or how
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 08:43:12 -0800, Bruce Dayton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, we are swinging back to Monterey and the 17 mile drive for this
one. Part of the same trip as the other two.
Pentax *istD, Sigma 55-200/3.5-5.6 DC, Handheld
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/pinnacles_0085.htm
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 14:52:12 -0800, Pat White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank's bike don't need no steenkeeng brakes! Looks like it's got none.
Nice bike, I bet it's very light.
Pat White
Thanks Pat (and Chris, too). Whenever anyone asks where the brakes
are, I slap my thighs real loud
alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I bought the FA* 80-200/2.8 a couple of weeks ago. So far I am very
pleased with it and an I can second everything John Francis said about
this lens. Also, if this is important for you, I think it is one
of the very few zoom lenses that have a good bokeh. That
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 03:09:25 -0800, Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The explanation makes the photo, in truth.
I know there's a lot of commentary to the contrary, but there simply are
some photos that benefit from a little help.
I was going to mention the explanation at the first
I don't know about the Atlanta Constitution but on the web Wolf is
advertising a *ist DS kit at that price and the *ist D body is $1399. It
would have been a heck of deal...
Larry
Today's Atlanta Journal-Constitution newspaper included a sales flyer
from Wolf Camera. It includes an
101 - 200 of 269 matches
Mail list logo
