On 8 Jan 2005 at 22:46, Alan Chan wrote:
I remember you asked me about the built-in filters of the 15/3.5. I just
relubed
my lens last week and took a snap of the filter disc. The filters are actually
SMC glasses, about 1mm thick and 1cm diameter (not exact). The edges of the
filters are
This is an update to inform those who cares, if any, that Pentax have updated
the
helicoid support of this lens from 2 plates to 3. The focusing ring of the
updated
version is pretty smooth and light even with the 100mm metal hood (yup, the
metal
hood for M100/2.8). So how to tell which is
--- Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the pic and explanation. I haven't take my A15/3.5 apart yet, I
would love the change some of the filters though it's not as important as it
once was now I'm primarily shooting digital. Did the re-lubing make much
difference to the focus
On 9 Jan 2005 at 2:25, frank theriault wrote:
Thanks, Trevor,
Hooroo I knew (hey, that rhymes! g).
Now I know what Cooee means.
It's like you guys have a whole different language down there, eh?
(I know you realize I'm just teasing you good-naturedly...)
cheers (I mean,
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 02:25:16 -0500, frank theriault wrote:
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 18:17:09 +1100, Trevor Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day Frank.
Cooee means call, phone, let u know etc etc etc
Hooroo means good bye, seeya, byebye, pissenzeoffski, etc etc etc'
Thanks, Trevor,
Hooroo I knew
Jon Glass wrote:
I just posted my first photo to WebAperture that I have taken with a
Pentax camera. The story and all are on the page. Please let me know
what you think I should have done differently, or better.
http://webaperture.com/gallery/showimg.php3?iid=54684md=nw
It's a good photo, but
Hi!
I am plannning to visit my brother in Coral Springs in a month or so. I
am interested in buying an *istDS camera there, as they seem to be even
300EUR/400USD cheaper in US than they are here in Finland !
So far i have only managed to find RitzCamera in Coral Springs. The
problem is, i can
I recall, vaguely, some slide show program you could cause to
hesitate, so long as you pressed some keyboard key, like the S.
As long as you held it down, the progression stopped, and started up
again when you released the key.
That may have been as long ago as 20 years...and as to what
Did you notice, this fella has a 6X6 or a 6X9 folder, in a well-used
Everready case, resting on his hip?
Don't see many of those these days!
keith whaley
Jon Glass wrote:
I just posted my first photo to WebAperture that I have taken with a
Pentax camera. The story and all are on the page.
G'day James.
Hows the MZ-7 going?
Hooroo.
Regards, Trevor
Australia
-Original Message-
From: James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 9 January 2005 9:10 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax 67 lens fitted to ZX-L.
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 02:25:16 -0500, frank theriault
On 8/1/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
Canon, David, C-A-N-O-N ... why is it that so many people are hesitant to
use the names of other camera manufacturers here? There's no such
reluctance to use the names of other lenses.
CANON NIKON KONICA MINOLTA (See, we're all still
On 8/1/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
Canon, David, C-A-N-O-N ... why is it that so many people are hesitant to
use the names of other camera manufacturers here? There's no such
reluctance to use the names of other lenses.
CANON NIKON KONICA MINOLTA (See, we're all still
Alan Chan escribió:
I remember you asked me about the built-in filters of the 15/3.5. I just
relubed my
lens last week and took a snap of the filter disc. The filters are actually SMC
glasses, about 1mm thick and 1cm diameter (not exact). The edges of the filters
are
half perpendicular (up), and
but Frank, they'll all be in focus.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 1:54 AM
Subject: Re: K 85-210/4.5
I'm sure they'll all look like typical fisheye cliches, but it was
fun, none-the-less.
On 8/1/05, Jeff Tokayer,
discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm telling you Dave, the E-1 is the one you need to replace both the
D2H *istD.
A genuine comedian!
Cheers,
Cotty
I have not mentioned to Jeff or Frank that we have been talking.LOL
--- Carlos Royo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are a really brave and skilful man, Alan. I wouldn't dare to
disassemble my A 15 mm. 3.5 in case it needed cleaning or lubing
(happily it is in perfect shape). I am hopeless for such kind of
delicate work.
Curious and a little skillful maybe,
Its a good picture Jon.
The colours seem very bright on my monitor and the view into the ballon is
good. Only
thing i may
have done different is to get a bit furthur back,but you may not have been able
to do
that.
Nice.
Dave
Humm. I opened a Flickr account the other day and seem to have problems loading
and
getting a
working url.I seem to get page not found errors everytime i did something.
And than it
worked.
Oh well on to the photo.:-)
I liked the first one you showed a few months ago Frank,and this one i like
David Chang-Sang wrote:
http://www.chang-sang.com/paw/
It's with the EOS-3.. I'm hoping to have some film back from the lab this
week that I can post next weeks PAW as a K1000 shot..
Cheers
Dave
Great capture of a grand old building David.
I
Quoting Trevor Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
G'day Frank.
Cooee means call, phone, let u know etc etc etc
Hooroo means good bye, seeya, byebye, pissenzeoffski, etc etc etc
Hooroo.
Regards, Trevor
Australia
My guess was going to be Cooee means Hey!
Walk good.
ERNR
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 14:10:32
US/Eastern,Frank said
I love horsies in the snow pix. There's just something about the
contrast of the big, beautiful, brown animal against the white snow
that just turns my crank.
Thats why i bought two.LOL
I like
On 8/1/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
An alternate title I was thinking of was, Please Completely Insert
Your Quarter...
Foul language warning: If swear-words offend you, don't open this url:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/3124455/
Comments are always
On 9/1/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
I've come to ignore flickr images, because I have to append everything
after the @ to see them. Can't just click on the url. And then they take
forever to load.
Paul, what email app are you using?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O)
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 07:59:42 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Oh well on to the photo.:-)
I liked the first one you showed a few months ago Frank,and this one i like
even better.
Tonality is good,i'm a sucker for lines(surveyor you know.lol)and they work
very
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 00:34:39 -0500, Jeff Tokayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good shot Frank. I like it.
Jeff.
Thanks, Jeff. I'll show you the print at the next TOPDML. vbg
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
I have a problem with those URLs when using comcast's web-based e-mail,
which i've been using on all but my main machine. When I'm on my home
desktop machine, I use the OSX Mail app, and I don't have a problem.
But I still find flickr very slow in comparison to photo net.
On Jan 9, 2005, at
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 13:28:07 +, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cracking shot Frank, well done.
Thanks, Cotty,
I must admit to being a teeny bit mystified (but none-the-less
grateful) WRT the response to this one. I think it's a good enough
shot, but lots of people seem to get more out of
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 07:59:42 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Humm. I opened a Flickr account the other day and seem to have problems
loading and
getting a
working url.I seem to get page not found errors everytime i did something.
And than it
worked. snip
The problem
For your information. I have noticed the the above described Pentax Shift
lens causes underexposure, when set in shift position on the *ist D. This
error only occurs when shift is performed in up-down position. Not when it's
shifted sideways. I have metered using the green button in M mode. I
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 08:38:49 +0100, Jon Glass [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just posted my first photo to WebAperture that I have taken with a
Pentax camera. The story and all are on the page. Please let me know
what you think I should have done differently, or better. BTW, the
negative from which
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 03:42:33 -0800, Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you notice, this fella has a 6X6 or a 6X9 folder, in a well-used
Everready case, resting on his hip?
Don't see many of those these days!
I did notice that, Keith!
I wonder what it was?
-frank
--
Sharpness is
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 07:33:55 -0500, Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but Frank, they'll all be in focus.
Don't be so sure of that, Herb! LOL
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 8/1/05, Peter J. Alling,
discombobulated,
unleashed:
Well here it is, what you've all been waiting for. My first PESO taken
with the *ist-D. It's not the most
inspired photograph I've ever taken. But I've been screwing around with
this
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be nice to be able to opt out of the slide show.
If you're enough of a geek to be able to use a web proxy (I use
Proxomitron) you can. In fact, you can opt out of *anything* a web site
tries to do. I don't allow them to open new browser windows,
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:50:21 -0800,
Powell Hargrave
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It got a bit white here today.
http://members.shaw.ca/hargravep/Image1.htm
Powell
Surely, ~that~ is the mother of all clothes lines! vbg
Cool shot!
On Jan 9, 2005, at 3:31 PM, frank theriault wrote:
I like it. I don't know that I'd do anything different, but Steve may
have a point. I would like to see a couple of shots with the basket
either not there, or with more (or all) of the basket in there, just
for the sake of comparision with the
On Jan 9, 2005, at 12:42 PM, Keith Whaley wrote:
Did you notice, this fella has a 6X6 or a 6X9 folder, in a well-used
Everready case, resting on his hip?
I was wondering if anybody would notice it! I thought it interesting
that I caught that! I bet he got some beautiful photos that day.
--
-Jon
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 19:20:36 +1000, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oath mate, best familiarize yourself before landing on our shores or no one
will know what the bloody hell you are on about :-)
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~enigman/australia/slang.html
On Jan 9, 2005, at 1:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The colours seem very bright on my monitor.
You have no idea how happy I am to read the above. :-) The poor photo,
directly out of the scanner was quite washed out in yellow
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 09:45:57 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Ours is about that long to Frank.lol snip
Oh, the length isn't what caught my eye. It was the thickness. Girth
is as important as length, or so I'm told... LOL
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois
I sure hope that's a distortion due to the perspective, and not snow!!!
That is an amazing photo! And I can't decide which version I prefer
On Jan 8, 2005, at 12:50 AM, Powell Hargrave wrote:
It got a bit white here today.
http://members.shaw.ca/hargravep/Image1.htm
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow,
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 10:02:46 -0500, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're enough of a geek to be able to use a web proxy (I use
Proxomitron) snip
Apparently, I'm not a geek, as I have no idea what a web proxy or
Proxomitron are. I'm not even enough of a geek that I want to know
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 16:01:15 +0100, Jon Glass [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This:
http://www.dabie.k-ow.net/~jonglass/balloons/pages/19980501006_1.html
is a tiny version of the same scene, shot further back, where you can
see how tight it was, due to the crowd. snip
Which is why I thought that
Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the pic and explanation. I haven't take my A15/3.5 apart yet, I
would love the change some of the filters though it's not as important as it
once was now I'm primarily shooting digital. Did the re-lubing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mine does this on occasion -- depleted indicator that shows full again when
the camera's turned off and back on.
That's because the batteries can recover from short periods of high
discharge after a short period of rest.
Here's the lowdown: You're never going to get a
I think I actually prefer the color version. There's something about
the slightly blue tinge of the snow, and the wood tones of the fence
rail...
The BW is certainly very good as well, though :-)
-Mat
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 09:45:57 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ours is
The idea here is to view photos, not have to deal with overcoming computer
issues. When a web site doesn't work simply or easily, I just leave. If
there's something one must know in order to use a site, then the owner of
that site should let the viewer know what that is.
Flickr is a PITA for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/1/05, Jeff Tokayer, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm telling you Dave, the E-1 is the one you need to replace both the
D2H *istD.
A genuine comedian!
Cheers,
Cotty
I have not mentioned to Jeff or Frank that we have been talking.LOL
Dave
Hey, Frank
I've got a new, Captain Marvel Whiz Bang machine, and Flickr is a PITA for
me as well. I'll only put up with it for Juan's photos and yours because I
know the results will interest me, but I won't put up with the site in most
instances.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: frank
Hi Bob,
Here's something a little lighter to balance the depressing and heavy image
of the heroin user:
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/dog-doors/
I posted one of these before. Here's the set ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perhaps more of us than
I use flickr, but not as a general presentation site for all the
reasons you mention. However, it uses RSS to allow people to get feeds
of pictures for usage elsewhere - for example I use livejournal to
consolidate lots of websites i read on a daily basis (because I forget
to read them if they're
Well, Flick does not have a upper size limit for a single photograph. This
is very nice for some people and a PITA for others. If you have a good
connection (mine is 100 Mbps) Flickr works fine. It takes 4 secs to load
most pictures.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: PAW PESO - Untitled #624
Hi Bob,
Here's something a little lighter to balance the depressing and
heavy image
of the heroin user:
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/dog-doors/
Gargae Dogs?
William Robb
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 08:02:39 -0800, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bob,
Here's something a little lighter to balance the depressing and heavy image
of the heroin user:
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/dog-doors/
I posted one of these before. Here's the set ;-))
What if
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 10:44:08 -0500, Jeff Tokayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I'm really discombobulated.
According to Cotty, we're all discombobulated. g
BTW, if discombobulated means confused, does combobulated (if there's
such a word) mean the opposite? Like, I'm totally combobulated
LOL Yes, their Weilrotters
Shel
[Original Message]
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/dog-doors/
Gargae Dogs?
William Robb
frank theriault wrote:
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 10:44:08 -0500, Jeff Tokayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I'm really discombobulated.
According to Cotty, we're all discombobulated. g
BTW, if discombobulated means confused, does combobulated (if there's
such a word) mean the opposite? Like,
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
The idea here is to view photos, not have to deal with overcoming computer
issues. When a web site doesn't work simply or easily, I just leave. If
there's something one must know in order to use a site, then the owner of
that site should let the viewer know what that is.
discombobulated means someone has deliberately confused you. Since no one can
do the opposite (deliberately unconfuse you) there is no such word. So... if we
are all discombobulated, someone is doing it to us, probably Cotty in this case.
I think we should lynch him in effigy for it.
GRIN!
frank theriault wrote:
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 09:45:57 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Ours is about that long to Frank.lol snip
Oh, the length isn't what caught my eye. It was the thickness. Girth
is as important as length, or so I'm told... LOL
-frank
It apparently
Well, good for you. Not everyone has fast connections, so not everyone
will have an easy, enjoyable viewing experience using Flickr. I thought
the idea of web sites was to disseminate information quickly, easily, and
directly. It seems that now one must be technologically savvy, have fast,
and
Too much information here, Cowfish Billy ;-)) Some of us just want to see
the photos, not play with new technology - RSS, livejournal, consolidation
of feeds, interlinking websites - from what I can see and understand, none
of that adds anything to the VIEWER'S experience of seeing a photo.
AFAIK Pentax is still servicing LXen. After all it was only discontinued in 2000
(although they were almost impossible to get outside Japan). Since they were
made for almost 20 years official repairs should be available for at least a few
years yet. It is not lack of parts it is lack of
Damn you, Shel, I think I am having a heart attack!
LOL!
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Canon, David, C-A-N-O-N ... why is it that so many people are hesitant to
use the names of other camera manufacturers
Thanks for the report. Makes sense, given the (almost?) identical
imaging sensors in the two cameras and the faster processing in the
Ds. Did they drop any hints regarding the release of a higher-end DSLR?
--Mark
I asked about a higher-end 35mm model and did not get an encouraging
Thanks for the report. Makes sense, given the (almost?) identical
imaging sensors in the two cameras and the faster processing in the
Ds. Did they drop any hints regarding the release of a higher-end DSLR?
--Mark
I asked about a higher-end 35mm model and did not get an encouraging
Well one reason is actually to keep search engines looking for those names from
finding the list. But it only takes one mention to do the damage (grin).
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Cotty wrote:
On 8/1/05, Shel Belinkoff,
Me thinks that if you change the C to an H you will understand what he
means.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
frank theriault wrote:
But Cooee? Wassup with dat?
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG
A shout, I would think.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Trevor Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
G'day Frank.
Cooee means call, phone, let u know etc etc etc
Hooroo means good bye, seeya, byebye,
Quoting Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
AFAIK Pentax is still servicing LXen.
Certainly were doing so around April/May of 2004, when mine paid them a
couple of visits.
ERNR
Here's one I almost threw away. I few months ago I was driving out to
meet some friends for a run and I saw one of the most brilliant rainbows
I've ever seen. Unfortunately I was in the middle of suburbia and I
couldn't get a decent shot without an ugly foreground. I snapped one
through the
Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Good web design means making the site (therefore the information) available
to the greatest number of viewers, easily and simply.
Ahhh, Shel,
You always WERE an avant-garde thinker! Carry on...
That's absolutely the right way to
Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 8/1/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
Canon, David, C-A-N-O-N ... why is it that so many people are hesitant to
use the names of other camera manufacturers here? There's no such
reluctance to use the names of other lenses.
CANON
In a message dated 1/8/2005 11:40:27 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just posted my first photo to WebAperture that I have taken with a
Pentax camera. The story and all are on the page. Please let me know
what you think I should have done differently, or better. BTW, the
Hi,
Sunday, January 9, 2005, 4:39:18 PM, Graywolf wrote:
discombobulated means someone has deliberately confused you. Since no one
can
do the opposite (deliberately unconfuse you) there is no such word. So... if
we
are all discombobulated, someone is doing it to us, probably Cotty in this
In a message dated 1/8/2005 7:35:11 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For those of you who don't like Flickr, I've loaded it onto photo.net:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3021005size=lg
cheers,
frank
=
Very nice, frank. I prefer your people shots,
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 10:50 AM
Subject: RE: OT: Flickr vs. Photo.net-was: PAW: A Payphone in
Parkdale
I thought
the idea of web sites was to disseminate information quickly,
easily, and
- Original Message -
From: Graywolf
Subject: Re: *istD EOL...
AFAIK Pentax is still servicing LXen. After all it was only
discontinued in 2000 (although they were almost impossible to get
outside Japan).
It won't be the machanics that are the problem, it will be the
electronic
Getting a little tired of all the $35.00-$100.00 gizmos out
there to soften flash, most of which don't seem to do much,
I started playing around with some Houshold Goods.
Here's what I came up with:
http://www.donsauction.com/pdml/FlashTest/Diffuser.htm
2-$1.50 Snack Tray lids nested together.
A
In a message dated 1/8/2005 12:46:14 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/shooting.html
Some years ago this little pic made it into a booklet on the subject ...
First post hasn't made it to the list or the mail archive sorry if
Frank,
I did not coin the term. Though I may have helped in proliferating the
term LXen; I may be one of the early ones who began using it profusely.
This may be due to the fact that I ahve so many of them :-)
Looking forward to using a couple of LXen next weekend in south Florida,
César
I notice that you haven't gotten a reply. Assume you've checked online.
FWIW, a couple of years back when I needed some hard cases I was able to
buy from eBay.
Maybe try Porters?
Joe
Frank
Yes, I saw my name on your post - even responded to it :-) I am working
my way to keeping up with the list - you guys make it difficult, very
difficult ;-P
I am glad you took a look at the photo from a long time ago.
As to what happened? Who knows? By the way, I don't think we have
Ive tried ebay, the pickings are slim and some
are new and ridiculously high priced like $30
for a small case or because they are for collectors
with brands and focal lengths on them i.e. For the
Canon 105mm F2.5, etc.
I think what I will do is look for a large collection
of them at a good price
In a message dated 1/7/2005 3:47:48 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It got a bit white here today.
http://members.shaw.ca/hargravep/Image1.htm
Powell
===
Great shot. (I prefer the color one -- gives it more depth, but I usually
think color supplies more depth.)
Collin,
I can definitely recommend them, as can a few others.
The choice of skin is definitely dependent on one´s character and
personality.
Being that I have met you, and your lovely wife, in person - and I had a
great time! I think that the pebbled black calfskin will work well with
you.
Come on Peter,
You know you want exotic skins on your camera, you cannot resist them =-O
Thinking I may have to start touring with my reskinned cameras and get
converts,
César
Panama City, Florida
Peter J. Alling wrote:
At least is isn't snakeskin.
Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
I was drooling over
Derby,
I have again bookmarked this site. I will have to look into them.
The problem I have is that I would not want a couple of cameras with the
same skin.
Individuality, that is the key.
If you use them enough, you can tell a camera just by touch,
César
Panama City, Florida
Derby Chang wrote:
Alan,
As I stated in a previous post, I do not think that Collin would go well
with the Pinnk Paradise Snake Skin.
On the other hand, as far as I am concerned...,
César
Panama City, Florida
Alan Chan wrote:
--- Collin Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was drooling over cameraleather.com
Be careful Cotty!
I am definitely showing up in England this year. I hope to be laden
with film cameras.
Luddites unite!
César
Panama City, Florida
Cotty wrote:
On 5/1/05, Cesar, discombobulated, unleashed:
I am slowly coming out from the lurking shadows... therefore the late
response :-)
In a message dated 1/8/2005 11:12:00 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/?action=viewcurrent=Jan8-05_0199.j
pg
This one was taken Dec 27 after a bit of freezing rain. I was on my way to
the Kinmount
sawmill but
the roads were to bad and
Mark Roberts wrote:
Here's one I almost threw away. I few months ago I was driving out to
meet some friends for a run and I saw one of the most brilliant rainbows
I've ever seen. Unfortunately I was in the middle of suburbia and I
couldn't get a decent shot without an ugly foreground. I snapped
In a message dated 1/9/2005 10:04:29 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Getting a little tired of all the $35.00-$100.00 gizmos out
there to soften flash, most of which don't seem to do much,
I started playing around with some Houshold Goods.
Here's what I came up with:
Kenneth,
Glad you took the time to look and comment.
I have asked my father about the negatives. He threw them all out. I
am not sure why the batch I found still survive.
I am planning on getting a print of this made and presenting it to my
mother. I am sure that she has forgotten all about
Graywolf wrote:
AFAIK Pentax is still servicing LXen. After all it was only discontinued
in 2000 (although they were almost impossible to get outside Japan).
Since they were made for almost 20 years official repairs should be
available for at least a few years yet. It is not lack of parts it
I pay $25 a year, that's fifty cents a week, for PhotoNet. I don't know
exactly how much space that buys me, but I have over 200 photos posted
there now with plenty of room to spare, so it's all I need. It's fast,
easy to work with, and the pages like good. I consider that a bargain.
Plus, I
Lots of fun, and well shot.
On Jan 9, 2005, at 11:02 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Bob,
Here's something a little lighter to balance the depressing and heavy
image
of the heroin user:
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/dog-doors/
I posted one of these before. Here's the set ;-))
Shel
Nah, just me getting as much mileage as possible
out of the few posts I have time for lately! ;-)
Don
BTW: The one made out of a bowl hoovers.
Guess size really does matter! ;-/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 12:41
Speaking of colorful dogs, check out this fellow:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3022581size=lg
He was painted by a fairly well known British artist named Simon Bull,
so while this is no bulldog, it is Bull's Dog. And that's no bull.
Pardon both the puns and the background clutter.
Hi,
Graywolf wrote:
AFAIK Pentax is still servicing LXen. After all it was only discontinued
in 2000 (although they were almost impossible to get outside Japan).
Since they were made for almost 20 years official repairs should be
available for at least a few years yet. It is not lack of parts
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
