On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 12:07:40AM +0100, Jens Bladt wrote..
Many brand names have been reused as names for products that have nothing to
do with the original brand/manufacturer. Trading companiers, that have no
production anymore or have no real realations with the original brand buy
old
I have mainly zooms. It's sort of useless exercise in futility to
put a teleconverter on a zoom, right? Or not?
The Sigma EX converters were actually optimised for a zoom lens originally,
the 70-200 f/2.8 EX.
John
-- Original Message ---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mused:
In a message dated 2/7/2005 10:17:56 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The first outing was a Muir Woods and Pt. Reyes. There was another at Pt.
Reyes as well, yes?
Shel
Yup, last year. I got some half-way decent shots. I think
Royal Gold 25 was another pretty nice Kodak emulsion, too.
Some claimed it was the consumer version of the Pro Ektar 25.
It's been discontinued for around five years, though.
Guess what I'm planning to put in my MZ-S for our field trip :-)
Bruce Dayton mused:
That has got to be one of the
Bruce Dayton mused:
John,
I'll put you on the list. I really hope that you'll be able to make
it.
So is Sonoma too far away for everyone or
should we put that on the list of potential places?
Bruce
The last two trips have been North of the Golden Gate;
why don't we try for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mused:
wild flowers on Mt. Diablo (not sure how many there are in early March)
Not really a plausible NorCal PDML meet, but apparently the high
rainfall means there will be some spectacular desert blooms in
Death Valley this year. I'm seriously considering taking two
or
You're right, Bruce. Also called a sweet gum.
I have one in my back yard, with a double trunk. Lovely all year 'round,
but in the fall, it's spectacular!
keith whaley
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Thanks, I believe the tree is called a Liquid Amber.
Well, I'm selling off my Canon gear and have both the 70-200/4L
and 300/4L IS as well as the 1.4x Extender II. If you're
interested in any of those bits, let me know.
Godfrey
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sheesh, my parade is rained on.
But thanks for the info.
Sigh. One of these days
Porst is not my primary brand of interest but I still think that what has been
said do far does not do this name justice.
Porst certainly is one of the great names in the German photo industry since the
twenties, although he - to my knowledge - never actually made cameras. However,
he had many,
On 7/2/05, Bruce Dayton, discombobulated, unleashed:
I was playing baseball with my son as the son was starting to go down.
I ran in the house and got the camera and two lenses. This shot was
taken with the *istD and Tokina ATX 400/5.6 AF handheld - working on
those techniques that Steady
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, keller.schaefer wrote:
Porst is not my primary brand of interest but I still think that what has been
said do far does not do this name justice.
Any comments on the Porst 55/1.2? What is its provenance, given that
it was not them who made it?
Thanks,
Kostas
John,
Very nice panorama of the Japanese Friendship Garden. Can you tell us how that
was done?
Pat in SF
--- John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a gallery I put together after the first PDML trip to Nuir Woods:
http://www.panix.com/~johnf/gallery/muir.html
Here's a page I've
--- John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wouldn't suggest trying to photograph *inside* the museum.
But it's in a public park, which doesn't require anything
special.
Hmm, I'm not sure about the public park business. Far as I'm
aware, the grounds are all owned by the museum.
Regardless,
Nice shot. The foreground silhouette is a nice way of making it more
interesting. It looks quite sharp and steady to me. Good work.
Paul
On Feb 7, 2005, at 11:57 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Where I live (Sacramento, California), we don't get beautiful snowy
winters - mostly just fog and rain. But
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/02/08 Tue AM 12:27:57 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Copyrighting Public Space?
I'm not a lawyer, but it seems to me that you cannot stop someone from
photographing outside in a public area. If it were truly on private
grounds,
Ah, one of my favorite shade trees. They're quite prevelant on the east
coast where they're known as Liquidumbar or Sweet Gum. Unfortunately,
they're not hardy enough for Michigan.
Paul
On Feb 8, 2005, at 1:38 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Thanks, I believe the tree is called a Liquid Amber.
--
Best
I haven't been photographing long enough to mourn those two, but I am
still mourning the passing of Supra/Royal Gold 100. Very nice film,
that...
Anybody still got a few rolls in the fridge? :-)
-Mat
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 03:28:08 -0500 (EST), John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Royal Gold 25
Kostas,
probably a 6-element Cosina lens as it was offered by Porst together with Cosina
made cameras.
I have found only one other reference to a 1.2/55 lens and that points towards
Vivitar - but Vivitar never made lenses themselves.
According to the Vivitar lens numbering code, a 9 as the first
Joseph wrote:
I wonder if it will take Pentax 8 to 10 years to bring out a full series of D
FA primes. It can't be good for their business if they do. I wonder how many of
Pentax's 300 RD employees (thanks to Alan Chan for that figure) are working on
D FA lenses?
REPLY:
Ken Takeshita more
Jens wrote:
I doubt Pentax will aim at a pro-level DSLR. I Pentax wanted to, they would
have manufactured the full frame MZ-D.
I guess what we might see from Pentax will be a 8-10Mp prosumer DSLR. Pretty
much like the *ist DS, but with more MP's.
REPLY:
In my opinion they have to. The MD-S
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0502/05020808pentax_softwareupdate21.asp
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
And guess what I found in the fridge a few weeks ago: that roll of RG25
you gave me at Sears Point a couple of years back ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: John Francis
Royal Gold 25 was another pretty nice Kodak emulsion, too.
Some claimed it was the consumer version of the Pro Ektar
It's a shame that a whole generation of photographers will never know the
joy of emulsions like Ektar 25, Panatomic-X, RG25, Agfa APX-25, and other
similar emulsions.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Mat Maessen
I haven't been photographing long enough to mourn those two, but I am
still
Better later than never :-)
Thanks for comments. I think he didn't smoked
anything, he was simply crazy...
Regards
Albano
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/2/2005 5:17:53 AM Pacific
Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Albano Garcia wrote:
Hi gang,
This is a
I believe the reason that the recent Kodak 25 speed emulsions
were discontinued was they were able to make signifigant improvements
in the 100 emulsions to the point that the 25 was obsolete and they
were unable to make the corresponding improvements in the 25's so
goodbye 25. The films that came
Its also a shame that the great photographer of the past generations
never got a chance
to use the great emulsions of TODAY. There are far more great films
today
that ARE available that werent back in the day than great films of the
past
that arent available today. Im not saying nothing from the
The great photographers of the past who haven't had a chance to use
contemporary emulsions are dead. They won't miss the new emulsions.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: J. C. O'Connell
Its also a shame that the great photographer of the past generations
never got a chance to use the great
I think the reason is in great part because of the huge prevalence of
slow-speed zoom lenses that practically required faster film. Had Kodak
wanted to improve slower speed emulsions they could have. The money,
however, was elsewhere.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: J. C. O'Connell
I
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Pål Jensen wrote:
Pentax is still a venerable SLR
manufacturer but the large potential for Pentax is only there if
they offer in due course a complete line-up.
Pål,
When you write something, I always make a point of reading it. I don't
know what you mean by line-up, but
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3102193
Last January my wife and I had lunch in the old
section of Zurich, and this was the scene through the
window. There are some hazy reflections from the
glass; it's too bad Photoshop doesn't have a
polarizing filter! I took it with my 33L
All I can say is that if Pentax releases a new DSLR with the
size, ergonomics and design integrity of the *ist DS, uprated to
a more robust build spec, with improved speed and performance,
and with the same or better image quality, I'll be beating down
their door to buy it. I like the camera, the
it's too bad Photoshop doesn't have a
polarizing filter!
Why not try using a polarizer with your 33L?
I occasionally use one with my Optio.
After the fact, I suppose you could clone out the reflections in PS
Nice capture by the way.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Rick Womer
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
It's a shame that a whole generation of photographers will never know the
joy of emulsions like Ektar 25, Panatomic-X, RG25, Agfa APX-25, and other
similar emulsions.
Shel
That's what I'm feeling, as a newbie photographer. Started photographing
a bit more seriously
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 07:10:22AM -0800, Shel Belinkoff wrote..
It's a shame that a whole generation of photographers will never know the
joy of emulsions like Ektar 25, Panatomic-X, RG25, Agfa APX-25, and other
similar emulsions.
Go and buy some Efke 25 or Efke 50. They are *neat*...
--
- Original Message -
From: Wilko Bulte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arca Swiss, not Acra Swiss.
Be careful about spilling words, I'd say...
nietsoJ
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I think the current film Bright Sun (100, damn tacky name).
is most likely as good as any 100 they ever made and probably
matches those old 25s too.
No, it doesn't
Bill
Yeah, I know, the title hoovers. If you can do better (which you
undoubtedly can), any suggestions will gratefully be considered.
In the meanwhile, let me know what you think:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3102348size=lg
Utilizing the rather narrow dof at f1.2 vbg...
cheers,
Thanks, Kenneth. Holding my polarizer in front of the
33L made the shutter speed way to slow to hand-hold;
the day was much darker than the photo shows.
--- Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's too bad Photoshop doesn't have a
polarizing filter!
Why not try using a polarizer with
I just realized that I didn't sign my name to the note indicating an
interest in the gathering. I'm John.
John C. Mullan
Exit Realty Advantage
(707) 837-7111
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 8:42 PM
Subject: Re:
thebright sun 100 film is the Gold 100 emulsion. Not the same as
Royal Gold/Supra 100, which were ostensibly replaced by Royal Supra
200.
Having shot all three films, the RS200 may be a technically better
film in terms of resolution, but it renders colors differently, and
has quite a bit more
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 10:10:16 -0800 (PST), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Blue Girl by Frank Theriault
Interesting shot. Red and blue. I like the streaky overlay on the girl --
makes it a semiabstract portrait and it makes you take a second look.
snip
Thanks, Marnie!
vbg
One of the things that I notice people doing is letting the cops make law.
We fought a war to prevent that and other things. But we are letting the cops
make all kinds of laws that have no existance except in their minds.
Unfortunately us little people do not have the funds to fight back and get
Quoting Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, I'm selling off my Canon gear ...
Oh, my goodness!
After sadly seeing a few PDMLers go over to the dark side, it's so
refreshing to hear of the reverse happening!!
;-)
ERN
Bruce,
I've been lurking too long--put me on the list, too. I'm in Sacramento
(East Sac, to be exact). Regarding location, I propose that we go somewhere
interesting (of course), but also slightly exotic. SF itself is
interesting, but it is so over-photographed that I don't consider it
You have that one right, Cotty. If you use a tripod, you are defacto a
commercial photographer,unless you are in a college town where you then are a
student doing an assignment(grin). If you do not use a tripod you are a
obviously only a snapshooter.
BTW many cities do have anti-tripod laws on
per Dr Wayne Dyer.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Tom C wrote:
RULE # 1:
NEVER TAKE A 'NO' ANSWER FROM SOMEONE THAT DOESN'T HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO
SAY 'YES'.
WOOF.
Tom C.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 20:57:38 -0800, Bruce Dayton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where I live (Sacramento, California), we don't get beautiful snowy
winters - mostly just fog and rain. But sometimes, the clouds and sun
work together to provide some really nice sunsets.
I was playing baseball with
At 00:13 8/02/2005, you wrote:
In Namur (Belgium), where I live, I think we are not allowed to publish night
pictures of the citadel and of the bridges on the rivers nearby (all public
space and the city landmarks) because the artist who designed the lighting
claims he has a copyright on it.
Yeah, him as well. :)
Tom C.
From: Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Copyrighting Public Space?
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 12:22:52 -0500
per Dr Wayne Dyer.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
OK PDML Police, it's time to turn this guy in!
Both very beautiful pictures, Yves.
Yeah, that decision is ridiculous. Just think if God copyrighted the night
sky.
Tom C.
From: Yves Caudano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Copyrighting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/25/2005 4:36:41 PM Pacific Standard Time, k
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I will add to this resend, that you are equating universal object truth with
external reality. A common mistake.
I'm intrigued. Since you brought it up, what's the difference?
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: Copyrighting Public Space?
OK PDML Police, it's time to turn this guy in!
Both very beautiful pictures, Yves.
Yeah, that decision is ridiculous. Just think if God copyrighted
the night sky.
There are two aspects of copyright that have to
William Robb wrote:
snipped
I submit that if you are stopped from photographing a publicly owned
artifact which resides on public property, and you are photographing from a
public place, then you are living in a dictatorship, no matter what you may
happen to think about your government, and the
Godfrey DiGiorgi mused:
--- John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wouldn't suggest trying to photograph *inside* the museum.
But it's in a public park, which doesn't require anything
special.
Hmm, I'm not sure about the public park business. Far as I'm
aware, the grounds are all
Back in the USSR.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
- Original Message -
From: Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: Copyrighting Public Space?
One of the
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?A=searchQ=b=197b=29a=65_437shs=ci=278ac=Submit.x=16Submit.y=9Submit=Go
-
Bruce, these are all the older models, not the new models from Kenko and Tamron
that Jens referred us to with this link:
In a message dated 2/8/2005 9:49:32 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are you confusing belief with reality maybe? What we perceive, what we
believe, and what is reality may be 3 different things. But it would be
very strange to think there is no reality without a perception
In a message dated 2/8/2005 10:20:10 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not sure I'd want to visit Alcatraz this early in the year.
==
Truthfully, I really wouldn't either. The beginning of March, the weather is
likely still to be too iffy to be that near the water. Or
You're right, the shot is interesting, but the title hoovers...
frank theriault wrote:
Yeah, I know, the title hoovers. If you can do better (which you
undoubtedly can), any suggestions will gratefully be considered.
In the meanwhile, let me know what you think:
Graywolf wrote:
One of the things that I notice people doing is letting the cops make law.
We fought a war to prevent that and other things.
Which war was that? I thought most wars fought are to prevent abroad what
is implicitly sanctioned at home. :)
Police, prosecutors, judges are all part
Frank will like it.
The flare doesn't really detract much from the photo. It might have been
better with a polarizer, or it might just have been different.
I think it evokes a time a place quite nicely as it is...
Rick Womer wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3102193
Last January
In a message dated 2/8/2005 8:53:29 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3102348size=lg
Utilizing the rather narrow dof at f1.2 vbg...
cheers,
frank
===
I like it, frank. The context, the framing, etc. BUT... in this case I'd
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 18:13:48 -0500 (EST), D. Glenn Arthur Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
I'm behind on my list reading so I don't know whether this has
already been discussed, but just in case it hasn't ... :
http://newurbanist.blogspot.com/2005/01/copyrighting-of-public-space.html
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 10:37:36 -0800 (PST), Bourgeois Marnie opined:
I like it, frank. The context, the framing, etc. BUT... in this case I'd like
*something* in focus -- either the screen, the hand, or the girl. Sorry.
LOL.
The right edge of the screen is more in focus than much of the rest
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 13:36:42 -0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're right, the shot is interesting, but the title hoovers...
I know it hoovers. I didn't ask you to merely confirm that. I asked
if anyone had any suggestions as to a better (non-hoovering) title.
vbg
Thanks
In a message dated 2/8/2005 10:41:35 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, in answer to the initial question, Wimmer should have been allowed
to photograph the Bean. They really can't stop him. Whether he can
then publish or sell those photos is a whole different issue, but
Hi Frank ...
Saw your recent PAW when cruising the archives.
Interesting idea but perhaps the execution is a bit flawed. It would be
nice to see what's on the computer screen. I tried to raise the info in PS
but couldn't :-((.
The narrow focus was a good idea, but the focus is, imo, a bit
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 07:57:32 -0800 (PST), Rick Womer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3102193
Last January my wife and I had lunch in the old
section of Zurich, and this was the scene through the
window. There are some hazy reflections from the
glass;
Hi,
Tuesday, February 8, 2005, 4:51:47 PM, frank wrote:
Yeah, I know, the title hoovers. If you can do better (which you
undoubtedly can), any suggestions will gratefully be considered.
here's a few:
http://archive.salon.com/21st/chal/1998/02/10chal2.html
In the meanwhile, let me know what
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 13:38:51 -0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank will like it.
Am I that predictable? g
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Hi,
In Namur (Belgium), where I live, I think we are not allowed to
publish night pictures of [...]
I find very disturbing that it is not allowed to take pictures of the main
cityscape at night.
there is a world of difference between publishing pictures, and simply
taking pictures.
--
Yup.
I've got family members who worked at Kodak. Ektar was killed due to
cost/line consolidation.
What a wonderful film. Royal Gold 25 was equivalent.
(still got several hundred rolls of APX25 in 35 and 120 in the fridge,
though)
-Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff
In a message dated 2/8/2005 10:51:24 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
here's a few:
http://archive.salon.com/21st/chal/1998/02/10chal2.html
In the meanwhile, let me know what you think:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3102348size=lg
Nice picture.
--
Cheers,
Joe,
Sorry, I didn't realize that you were talking about the newer Pro
versions. My understanding is that only the Sigmas are available in
Pentax mount and the Sigmas only fit certain lenses.
If you don't need AF in the converter, KEH has a couple of 2X-L's for
about $160.
Bruce
Tuesday,
Beautiful!
I am such a city girl, who often looks at vistas wondering: pretty,
so what..?
I think your pictures start answering my question.
cheers,
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 20:57:38 -0800, Bruce Dayton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_1130.htm
ISO 400, 1/1500 @
Last Saturday I spent some time in Chinatown in San Francisco (it
helps that I live about six blocks from it,) enjoying the crowds and
the new year celebrations.
http://www.jbuhler.com/photoblog/index.php?showimage=2
(ist D @ISO800, FA35/2)
BTW, I shot a bit that day with the Industar 50/3.5, a
That is an excellent interpretation of a jet trail, Bruce. I really like it.
Very good eye.
j
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 20:57:38 -0800, Bruce Dayton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where I live (Sacramento, California), we don't get beautiful snowy
winters - mostly just fog and rain. But sometimes, the
Bike courier by day, jazz band leader by night:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3102712size=lg
I was going to wait a couple of days on this one, but since a couple
of people (quite accurately) noted my missed focus on the last one, I
thought I'd show that I can, from time to time at
It seems like I'm still losing messages--I only saw the answers to
this, never your initial post, Frank.
I like this one a lot. As Shel says, maybe the focus could be a bit
better, but it doesn't bother me too much. The way she's out of focus
and the computer is in focus makes the picture, I
lol ... I love taking pictures in fog and just after rain. Cold
doesn't bother me too much, as long as I'm prepared for it. But
then again, I am the person who would prefer to live on an
island in the Irish Sea. ;-)
Regards the Egyptian, it's probably an ok place to shoot as
long as you don't
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:24:15 -0800, Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last Saturday I spent some time in Chinatown in San Francisco (it
helps that I live about six blocks from it,) enjoying the crowds and
the new year celebrations.
http://www.jbuhler.com/photoblog/index.php?showimage=2
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 18:56:48 +, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there is a world of difference between publishing pictures, and simply
taking pictures.
Precisely!
Another thing to remember, is that the laws vary (often significantly)
from country to country, and often even within a
But Costco is running a special on film and slide scanners:
http://www.costco.com/Browse/Product.aspx?prodid=10039838whse=topnav=cat=s=1
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 22:16:26 +0100, Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The real reason salt melts ice is that the affinity of water to salt
ions is greater than the affinity towards other water molecules. So
the salt grabs the water away from the ice crystal grid.
So there...:-)
Thank you,
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 19:11:19 +0100, Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Marnie, it apparently lowers the temperature snow and ice melts, as
IIRC salt water has lower freezing point. Apart from that, it damages water
reserves, is not much good for the environment and destroys your
leather
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
It's a shame that a whole generation of photographers will never know the
joy of emulsions like Ektar 25, Panatomic-X, RG25, Agfa APX-25, and other
similar emulsions.
But Shel, you haven't been paying attention this last few years. All
those effects can be emulated in
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 13:48:26 -0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems the subject of a couple of my latest pesos has gotten a job at
the local coffee house...
So Cannon Girl has become Coffee House Girl.
The main purpose for this image is to see what I can do with my Vemer
Frank's pic of the trumpet player reminded me of a photo of a trombonist.
This guy's a member of a jazz band comprised of older, retired guys who
play various venues around the Bay Area, mostly outdoors and off the back
of their old, restored truck. Here's the trombonist:
In a message dated 2/8/2005 11:49:42 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
lol ... I love taking pictures in fog and just after rain. Cold
doesn't bother me too much, as long as I'm prepared for it. But
then again, I am the person who would prefer to live on an
island in the Irish
It's a nice setup, but I wish the bottom of the trumpet head didn't
scrape the lower frame.
Be it either more in, or more obviously cut. A wider lens would
accentuate the frontal trumpet in your face effect. But, that's only
me..
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:38:26 -0500, frank theriault
[EMAIL
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:53:14 -0800, Bruce Dayton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I took my daughter, Erin, out shooting Saturday afternoon. We went
somewhere that neither of us had been before. Quite a pretty area and
we had a good time. I'll try to post some of hers soon (have to scan
them - she
BTW, the trumpet player is blind ...
I may put up another little snap as I know Paul might like a better shot of
the old truck.
Yes, I deserved that one, but then, I'm so bourgeois LOL
Shel
[Original Message]
From: frank theriault
I wish the background were a bit more in focus, and the
The heck with the pictures... I'd love to HEAR them! g
What a team!
keith
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Frank's pic of the trumpet player reminded me of a photo of a trombonist.
This guy's a member of a jazz band comprised of older, retired guys who
play various venues around the Bay Area, mostly
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 14:27:41 -0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just in case some of you thought I only shot portraits of girls and
dogs, here's something a little
different, or not depending on your point of view...
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PESO_--_catportrait.html
In a message dated 2/8/2005 11:26:24 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.jbuhler.com/photoblog/index.php?showimage=2
(ist D @ISO800, FA35/2)
BTW, I shot a bit that day with the Industar 50/3.5, a 39mm mount film
for the very first Zenit SLRs. There's something about
There doesn't seem to be many reviews of the PrimeFilm 3650U on the net.
Anyone have personal experience with it?
Tim
On 2/8/05 12:00, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
But Costco is running a special on film and slide scanners:
A fastidious man... nice separation on those eyelashes... g
Oh, and the OOF areas are clean...what lens did you use?
keith
Rolling Red wrote:
It's a nice setup, but I wish the bottom of the trumpet head didn't
scrape the lower frame.
Be it either more in, or more obviously cut. A wider lens would
frank theriault wrote:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:53:14 -0800, Bruce Dayton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I took my daughter, Erin, out shooting Saturday afternoon. We went
somewhere that neither of us had been before. Quite a pretty area and
we had a good time. I'll try to post some of hers soon (have
Film has always been dead. I have yet to see any film alive
Godfrey
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Hello Juan,
I like this shot. The timing is just right with the little girl
looking right at you with the mom oblivious to the scene. I kinda
wish the guy right behind them wasn't there, but then the timing would
have been off.
Lens looks like it performs well, too. I'm curious if you use AF
1 - 100 of 256 matches
Mail list logo
