Hi,
Depends what colour your walls and furniture is.
I think it's a wonderful shot, but it's gotta match the decor (not
that I'd know what matches and what doesn't).
If I decorated a place, everything would be either black or white,
that way I'd know my photos would work. vbg
I saw a TV
On Feb 26, 2005, at 1:51 PM, Alan Chan wrote:
I am afraid there is a bad news. Vuescan is known to have streaks when
using Minolta
scanners.
I thought it could calibrate around that sort of thing (much like the
Minolta software does).
I downloaded the trial version for use with my Multi Pro but
On 25/2/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Thanks Cotty.
At least you don't hate me for it.
Not at all. I have two black MXs - a beater shelf dust collector and a
mint user :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/canoneos350d/
Canon 350D: About the same dimensions as the ist DS, 60g lighter, and 8
megapixels. Thoughts?
Rgds,
Ryan
William Robb wrote:
At least you don't hate me for it.
I've stopped hating you now, and am merely jealous. :-)
Congrats.
S
From: Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am afraid there is a bad news. Vuescan is known to have streaks when
using Minolta
scanners. My Minolte Elite has the same issue as well, particular with the
blue
channel. What I have found is that the mirror inside the scanner has some
spots
which the
--- David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought it could calibrate around that sort of thing (much like the
Minolta software does).
I downloaded the trial version for use with my Multi Pro but the
trouble is, the trial version doesn't have all of the features - so I
can't properly
SilverFast does a good job too, but I prefer Vuescan's
algorithms. And Vuescan is cheaper, can handle a ton of
different scanners if you decide to move to a different scanner
at some point. I use it to drive both a Minolta SDII and an
Epson 2450.
I had a look at Silverfast but didn't like
Thanks Alan
I've not noticed any streaks yet but I've only scanned around 20 negs, one
particularly old negative did produce what I presumed was a scratch. If there
are spots on the mirror I would assume the streaks would be horizontal across
the scan? If this is the case then I think it was a
That's very reassuring to know, thanks Bruce.
John
-- Original Message ---
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alan Chan pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 20:57:49 -0800
Subject: Re: Alternatives to vuescan
I've got over 5,000 scans on my Scan Dual II, so my
I suspect something else could be the problem. When I first got
the Scan Dual II, I ran the MInolta software. I wasn't satisfied
with it, it both tended to crash frequently and my scans weren't
particularly sharp.
I'm finding the results with Vuescan much better than the supplied software
G'day Kev.
Mate, Have you tried f16 camera repair in Clontarf, Brissie?
I hear good things about his work.
Especially on Pentax gear.
Hooroo.
Regards, Trevor
Grafton
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Waterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 26 February 2005 1:33 PM
To:
--- John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there are spots on the mirror I would assume the streaks would be
horizontal
across the scan?
Yes, and it can be fixed with the Single Row Marquee Tool in Photoshop, before
the
image was rotated in anyway.
=
Alan Chan
--- John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm finding the results with Vuescan much better than the supplied software
with much better facilities for fine adjustment, colour rendering appears to
be significantly better also.
Indeed, especially for colour negatives.
=
Alan Chan
Thanks Alan, I'll be keeping an eye open for any streaking.
John
-- Original Message ---
From: Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 04:30:22 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Alternatives to vuescan
--- John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed, especially for colour negatives.
I've not got to slides yet, I guess that will be the real test, greater
dynamic range required from the hardware.
John
- Original Message -
From: Peter J. Alling
Subject: Re: FS Friday - FA* Lenses and more
Federation Credits
Can we just settle on a currency and get this auction under way?
William Robb
I am afraid there is a bad news. Vuescan is known to have streaks
when using Minolta scanners.
Did you experiment with the infrared cleaning filter?
John
John,
Nice memories of a special day.
I didn't look at the whole gallery, now or with the original post.
I think it is a better practice to edit before you post.
I know this is just for your relatives, but I'd only show the best.
You are a fantastic photographer if you edit... and just a
I got the viewfinder with the uncoated glass installed
in the SF1n last night and the result is, well, interesting.
The image is now much brighter and very much sharper.
The interesting part is with the uncoated glass the out of
focus highlights tend to take on a 'star like' quality.
It's almost
Ryan Lee wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/canoneos350d/
Canon 350D: About the same dimensions as the ist DS, 60g lighter, and 8
megapixels. Thoughts?
Does it take Pentax glass?
The too small viewfinder denies the other main reason for operating
a DSLR. No true spot meter either. Certainly not the camera to
switch systems for.
Servus, Alin
Ryan wrote:
RL http://www.dpreview.com/articles/canoneos350d/
RL Canon 350D: About the same dimensions as the ist DS, 60g
HAR! Only in Cotty's World...
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Cotty wrote:
On 25/2/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Thanks Cotty.
At least you don't hate me for it.
Not at all. I have two black MXs - a beater
Hi,
short account of what I was doing last few days...
yesterday night I arrived back home from the summit of Bush and
Putin (RF's president, for anybody so uninformed to not know!),
which took place for few days in Slovakia's capital Bratislava.
I was one of the thousand or so
--- John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe the maximum resolution is 2438 dpi which results in
max.
3504 x 2336 about 8.18 million pixel, not the best but it's
free :)
Hmm. My calculator spreadsheet says that a 24x35mm frame scanned
at 2438ppi nets an image 2304x3455 pixels in
--- Alin Flaider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The too small viewfinder denies the other main reason for
operating
a DSLR. No true spot meter either. Certainly not the camera
to
switch systems for.
I have heard this thing about Canon having no true spot meter
so many times...
It's incorrect.
Hmm. My calculator spreadsheet says that a 24x35mm frame scanned
at 2438ppi nets an image 2304x3455 pixels in size, or 7.6
Mpixel. Something's off by a little bit somewhere... ;-)
Never calculated it just reading from the manual, shouldn't that be 24mm x
36mm ?
RAW is really the name of a
On Feb 26, 2005, at 9:56 AM, Frantisek wrote:
.. (flames offlist please g)
That goes double for you young fellow.
Hi,
what would be the safe shutter speed to avoid the colour and
contrast shift under high intensity lighting? Always when I am
shooting some event lit by something like that, I get incosistent
colours in a burst of frames. I hope it's not the camera
(elsewhere it worked fine, and
I'll give you a buck for the whole lot, ok?
(I'll go $1.50)
I'm in for $2.25. Heck, I'll even bid that in US$
4.50 in euros.
5 Quatloos
See - it's just like eBay - mention an auction here and the auction bids
start skyrocketing...
Fred
I consider it up to the seller of an item to establish a price.
I agree, you're turning this into an 'off eekbay' auction. At least let
us know what you'd 'like to get' so we know where reasonable might
lie. Do some research on eBay, it'll give you real world numbers as to
what this stuff
yesterday night I arrived back home from the summit of Bush and Putin
(RF's president, for anybody so uninformed to not know!),
...then who's Bush?
Fred
Of course I wasn't suggesting it was the camera to switch systems for. Like
I'd be that bold! I'm suggesting that DSLR manufacturers need to stay
somewhat competitive in emerging markets as well.
This newcomer is pretty much the same size (and lighter) as the ist DS, and
at 8mp, and cheaper than
mike wilson wrote:
Ryan Lee wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/canoneos350d/
Canon 350D: About the same dimensions as the ist DS, 60g lighter, and 8
megapixels. Thoughts?
Does it take Pentax glass?
No, but it does have a mirror prism.
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
8mp isn't enough of an improvement in resolution over 6mp to make much
difference, especially as
there will be an increase in noise at higher ISOs. This will have to be
removed by software which will
probably cost quality. If it's the usual Canon construction for their
lower end cameras the
--- John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm. My calculator spreadsheet says that a 24x35mm frame
scanned
at 2438ppi nets an image 2304x3455 pixels in size, or 7.6
Mpixel. Something's off by a little bit somewhere... ;-)
Never calculated it just reading from the manual, shouldn't
I have seen APS sensors described as APS C and APS H What'd the
difference. Are there other APS sensor size designations?
Shel
yesterday night I arrived back home from the summit of Bush and Putin
(RF's president, for anybody so uninformed to not know!),
F ...then who's Bush?
I don't know ;-)
Good light!
fra
GD I have heard this thing about Canon having no true spot meter
GD so many times...
GD It's incorrect. Even the Canon 10D has a limited area metering
GD mode which is virtually identical in size to what Pentax calls a
GD spot meter. If you read the instruction booklets for both
GD cameras and
It think its C= classic = 1.5:1 aspect, H=HDTV = 16:9 = 1.78:1 aspect.
Don't know the dimensions or if these designations only refer to aspect
ratios.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2005 12:08 PM
To:
For 300 USD I got this on a local auction:
1 chrome MX with a 35-105 Tokina (perhaps for me :-)
1 chrome ME with a 200mm Pentax lense (don't know which) and a Osram Studio
flash (for sale)
1 chrome MG with a SMC-M 1.2/50mm and a Hanimex flash (for sale)
Any pre-ebay offers on these cameras, with
I own a Canon EOS RT that has the same mount as the Canon digitals. There
is a special adapter you can get that will allow the use of older M42 Super
Takumar and SMC Takumar lenses.
Jim A.
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005
APS C is aps Classic, more or less the same ratio as 35mm film (35mm ~
24x36mm, APS-C ~ 16x24)).
APS-H is the HDTV format on APS thats ~ 16x30, the other APS format is
panoramic which is 10x30mm.
As far as I now there aren't any Digital cameras that have a Panoramic
sensor. I doubt that there
I didn't know that this was your profession. Quite an opportunity
despite the discomfort. In the future you'll (partly) forget the
discomfort and just have some good stories to tell.
Joe
And your point?
Jim Apilado wrote:
I own a Canon EOS RT that has the same mount as the Canon digitals. There
is a special adapter you can get that will allow the use of older M42 Super
Takumar and SMC Takumar lenses.
Jim A.
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
Question for Mark Cassino:
Re:
My conclusion was that a low resolving lens with low CA and high edge
sharpness - which is what my tests showed the ATX 400 to be - will
create an image with clean edges and a high degree of _apparent_ detail.
Mark, I have this lens and am interested in your
I am interesting about 4.0/100-300
Popular Photography reviewed this lens a few years ago. Like many of
their lens reviews, one has to read between the lines. At 300 mm. it has
peripheral softness. One has to stop down to f16 to get edge-to-edge
sharpness at 300 mm. Clearly this requires a
I've had the ist D but am now I'm shooting a 20D, I dare say the 20D at 1600
looks -much- better than the ist D at 800. Would love an explanation- I'm
quite happy to go with what works..
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
I bet as HDTV becomes the norm the standard
TV screen is 16:9, there will be WAY MORE
H format digicams because digital photos look
pretty nice on a HDTV ( My 34 SONY HDTV does digital
photo display and slide shows via a memory stick slot).
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Peter J. Alling
I don't see why it requires a tripod.
Even at F5.6 you could get fast enough
shutter speeds with SLOW film in daylight.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Tainter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2005 1:08 PM
To: pdml
Subject: RE: Opinions about Sigmas
I am
Shel Belinkoff mused:
I have seen APS sensors described as APS C and APS H What'd the
difference. Are there other APS sensor size designations?
The true meaning of these designations is only appropriate when
used to refer to the differing aspect ratios on APS cameras.
In the DSLR world,
Saturday, February 26, 2005, 6:28:32 PM, Joseph wrote:
JT I didn't know that this was your profession. Quite an opportunity
JT despite the discomfort. In the future you'll (partly) forget the
JT discomfort and just have some good stories to tell.
Thanks. I don't do news regularly, so it was
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005, Peter J. Alling wrote:
And your point?
The point has to be don't top post.
Otherwise, Jim answered tongue-in-cheek the question Does it take
Pentax glass? below.
Kostas
Jim Apilado wrote:
I own a Canon EOS RT that has the same mount as the Canon digitals. There
is a
On DPReview Pentax forum
Special Interview with PENTAX @PMA [English Part1]
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=12418969
That would be cool to get an Xpan Hasselblad with a panoramic APS sensor.
Jim A.
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:37:46 -0500
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: APS Sensor Size
Resent-From: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=12418979
That's the best translation, but follow the other links also. It looks
like (a) the APS-C sensor is here for a while, and (b) there will be
more DA lenses, including limiteds.
Joe
I don't see why it requires a tripod.
Even at F5.6 you could get fast enough
shutter speeds with SLOW film in daylight.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Tainter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2005 1:08 PM
To: pdml
Subject: RE: Opinions about Sigmas
I am
Ask someone else for a lecture on information theory and wave physics, I
don't have the inclination to explain in what amounts to
cocktail party banter. Sorry, I just don't want to type that much and
sadly I'd need more math than I'm currently capable of.
It may look better but is it really,
Actually I top and bottom post, the toung in cheak answer was mine.
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005, Peter J. Alling wrote:
And your point?
The point has to be don't top post.
Otherwise, Jim answered tongue-in-cheek the question Does it take
Pentax glass? below.
Kostas
But if it´s sharp at f:16 only?
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2005 9:06 PM
Subject: RE: Opinions about
You sure?
Jim Apilado wrote:
That would be cool to get an Xpan Hasselblad with a panoramic APS sensor.
Jim A.
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:37:46 -0500
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: APS Sensor Size
Resent-From:
Hello Sven:
Your message was lost in my inbox, which until today held over 500
messages. I apologize for not replying to you for so long.
As you might know, I went ahead with the *ist DS because it's less
expensive than the D and it has all of the features which I wanted.
As it turns out, for
That should be tongue... (sometimes I should pay attention to the spell
checker...)
Peter J. Alling wrote:
Actually I top and bottom post, the toung in cheak answer was mine.
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005, Peter J. Alling wrote:
And your point?
The point has to be don't
Mea Culpa, I meant to send that message to Sven off list.
I didn't want to bore everyone with so many non-Pentax photos.
All this cleaning up of my email is making me groggy... I'm sorry!
Jim
Processing color negatives to RGB positives ... well, you have
to invert it, remove the crossover mask per the particular
film's profile, then gamma correct it. I'll let Vuescan do that
for me. ;-)
Yes me too, I'm more than pleased with the 48 bit TIFFs I'm getting, just a
little more fine
To me, it sounds like a sound philosophy, which seems typical of how
Pentax has grown over the last several years...
Thanks for the post. I think it's important.
keith whaley
Powell Hargrave wrote:
On DPReview Pentax forum
Special Interview with PENTAX @PMA [English Part1]
Special Interview with PENTAX @PMA
We have to grow this seeded pyrene. I wonder if it's lost in the
translation, or...
...and wants to harness sushi and the lens for inside seals now. Oh-oh -
I see the *ist D/DS analogue of the sticky mirror starting to form...
All joking aside, it was an
Still trying out the camera. These were taken, with various Pentax AF
lenses, this past Wednesday on Maine's southern coast.
http://hemenway.com/Nubble-Feb23/index.htm
Jim
5x7 Speed Graphic. Goerz lens. f/p shutter works!
With case, keys, focusing cloth.
pics on request.
$400
ZX-M Ex. cond. $75
Tominon 21mm screw mount lens with Pentax S/M adapter.
$125
+ shipping PayPal.
Collin
-
It is a serious thing to live in a society of
I have seen APS sensors described as APS C and APS H
What's the difference. Are there other APS sensor size
designations?
Here's the whole scoop regards APS film formats vs the similar
sized DSLR sensor formats.
format: proportion - dimensions - diagonal
- --- ---
--- Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not to sound nitpicky, but a true spot meter for me would
have to be
smaller than 6mm circle. In the nikons, the spot is about the
size of
the focusing brackets, 2.3mm (even less with the high-end
1-digit
bodies). The 1D... canons are the same. That's a
Hi All,
Has anyone bought an AC power adaptor for their *ist-D/s?
If so, I'd appreciate it if you could let me know what is power rating
(output amperage) is.
TIA,
Simon
I realize this wsn't meant to be posted to the list, but this
portfolio is worth having a look at.
William Robb
http://www.hemenway.com/Castle_in_Maine
http://www.hemenway.com/NorthOfBoston/
http://www.hemenway.com/Fruitlands/
http://www.hemenway.com/More-Maine/
- Original Message -
From: Powell Hargrave
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Special Interview with PENTAX @PMA
On DPReview Pentax forum
Special Interview with PENTAX @PMA [English Part1]
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=12418969
The first two sentences, if the
Still trying out the camera. These were taken, with various Pentax AF
lenses, this past Wednesday on Maine's southern coast.
http://hemenway.com/Nubble-Feb23/index.htm
C'mon, Jim, you can do better than just various Pentax AF lenses, can't
you? Other than the obvious 43 Ltd label, what
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Joe -
Question for Mark Cassino:
Re:
My conclusion was that a low resolving lens with low CA and high edge
sharpness - which is what my tests showed the ATX 400 to be - will create
an image with clean edges and a high degree of _apparent_ detail.
Mark,
- Original Message -
From: Frantisek
Subject: colour shift under big lighting
I have assumed that it's due to lighting flicker, and that
a slower shutter speed might solve the problem? Like with
photographing TV? If yes, what would be the good shutter speed?
I hope it's not
Nice. The first 20mm shot is my favorite.
Paul
Still trying out the camera. These were taken, with various Pentax AF
lenses, this past Wednesday on Maine's southern coast.
http://hemenway.com/Nubble-Feb23/index.htm
Jim
It seems to me that now days, a high fps rate is more important than
learning how to use your equipment properly.
Bill
Something I have noticed over the past while is a change in the way
photojournalists shoot at these types of events. I remember not too many
years ago, watching a famous head
I heard on Dpreview about a compatible ac adapter, so I bought it online
for about $12, its a Lenmar acon6, and it works just fine. It supplies
2100ma @ 6.5vDC and its a regulated DC switching supply. Unless you are
paranoid about getting the exact 3000ma one from Pentax, this one should
- Original Message -
From: Bill Owens
Subject: Re: colour shift under big lighting
It seems to me that now days, a high fps rate is more important
than learning how to use your equipment properly.
Perhaps this is the correct way to use them, in that situation.
However...
Watching
WR Now, they seem to be shooting nearly continuous high speed captures.
WR I was watching the Prince and Miss Camilla on the news the other day,
WR and I couldn't see any way in hell that the photo boys weren't
WR getting multiple flash bursts happening on the same frame.
Har, in a few years we
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I have seen APS sensors described as APS C and APS H What'd the
difference. Are there other APS sensor size designations?
I've never seen sensors described this way. It's always been _print_
formats and the different shapes and sizes all come from crops of the
original
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:59:29 -0600, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, they seem to be shooting nearly continuous high speed captures.
I was watching the Prince and Miss Camilla on the news the other day,
and I couldn't see any way in hell that the photo boys weren't
getting multiple
Jens Bladt wrote:
SMC-M 1.2/50mm
Do you really mean this?
mike
Hi,
Perhaps this is the correct way to use them, in that situation.
However...
Watching it on TV is annoying enough. It's a bit of a surprise that
celebrities and public figures don't snap more often.
not a good idea to bite the hand that feeds them.
--
Cheers,
Bob
Thank you.
I have found two examples of this Tamron by one of our local dealers
and will try them shortly I hope. Very interesting lens with IF and fast AF
as I see.
Does it true that the focus point of this lens is shifting during the
zooming?
Does it true that the
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: Re: Look what I scored - now FS !
Jens Bladt wrote:
SMC-M 1.2/50mm
Do you really mean this?
It's a very rare lens. I bet Jens was encouraged by the other auction
to put this lens out there for us to bid on.
I bid 7
William Robb
On 26 Feb 2005 at 11:44, Peter J. Alling wrote:
8mp isn't enough of an improvement in resolution over 6mp to make much
difference, especially as
there will be an increase in noise at higher ISOs.
Regardless it makes a world or difference as a sales and marketing lever,
especially to those
- Original Message -
From: Bob W
Subject: Re: colour shift under big lighting
not a good idea to bite the hand that feeds them.
I think of it more of a symbiotic relationship.
Something like mutual parasitism.
William Robb
No, sorry, my fingers are tired. It's a common 2.0 :-(.
But the 4/200mm (K or M) should be worth a few bucks.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 27. februar 2005 00:46
Til:
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: Look what I scored - now FS !
No, sorry, my fingers are tired. It's a common 2.0 :-(.
False advertising.
I withdraw my bid. g
William Robb
Tamron Fotovix
with lens for 35mm AND the 6x8 upgrade kit with lens
neg slide carriers.
All in Ex. or LN condition.
Use it to picture your slides negs to video.
$150 for PDML
+ shipping
PayPal
Collin
-
It is a serious thing to live in a society of possible gods
I compared the Tamron and Sigma offerings in this range, and aside from the
fact that the Tamron samples were just better, the Sigma was bigger and
slightly more expensive. I've had the Tamron 28-75 Di for a month now and I
couldn't be happier with it.
Amita
-Original Message-
From:
Are you shooting digital or film? If digital - do you have Auto White
Balance on?
When I fist shot swim meets with the *ist d I set it to AWB, figuring that
it could make better sense of the colors in the pool than I could. The first
batch of photos came out all over the place - water ranged
-Original Message-
From: Gianfranco Irlanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not familiar with the wide angle lenses of the EX series
This is where Sigma has really impressed me lately. My Sigma 15mm fisheye is
tack sharp, and so is their 20mm f/1.8 prime. I like the low light
William Robb wrote:
I was watching the Prince and Miss Camilla on the news the other day,
and I couldn't see any way in hell that the photo boys weren't getting
multiple flash bursts happening on the same frame.
Is this not where TTL scores - it will cut your flash and use the
opposition's?
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: Re: colour shift under big lighting
Is this not where TTL scores - it will cut your flash and use the
opposition's? You may still get incorrect exposure but it will not
be so bad as if you got the whole double burst. Also, although it
Canon's 1D Mk2 is a lot cleaner than the 1D that it replaced at the same
ISO, despite having pixels half the linear dimension. there's more to it
than that.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, February 26,
An interesting article from yesterdays Sydney Morning Herald. It isn't
easy being a street photographer these days. The Rex Dupain anecdote is
rather sad.
http://smh.com.au/articles/2005/02/25/1109180112027.html
(you might need to do the free registration)
D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
