On Feb 27, 2005, at 2:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a 100% crop of a high contrast area that would reveal any bloom:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3155211size=lg
Hmmm... and no bloom in sight. Now I'm wondering again if I have a
problem. Naturally, it was raining all day,
Eac What single thing do you consider to be the most important element of
Eac photography?
Eac ==
Eac The front element.
No, the rear element! Even in plain meniscus lenses ;-)
Good light!
fra
Took the *ist DS and 77mm Ltd to my friends' gig last night. What a
pleasure it is to use. None of this focus and recompose biz - I'm
getting used to thumbing though the focus zones. Net result: many more
in focus shots and not everything focussed centre of frame.
And auto-ISO is a great
A shot right into white sky with foreground objects seems to be the
worst case scenario. Mine was against snow, which is probably not as
extreme. Also the amount of bloom will vary from lens to lens. I would
try that 135 shooting some things you might normally shoot. See how it
performs in
Nice work. Very nice. You might want to edit it down to the ten best,
and you'll have an even better presentation.
Paul
On Feb 28, 2005, at 6:25 AM, Derby Chang wrote:
Took the *ist DS and 77mm Ltd to my friends' gig last night. What a
pleasure it is to use. None of this focus and recompose biz
this is the same drive that Rob Studdert that uses that has AA batteries for
power, right? it's fast. i am thinking of getting one just to use some of my
spare 2.5 drives. i have yet to use up a 4G Microdrive on a normal day's
shooting, although i have come close. on a wedding, i can see
If Kominek's can't repair the LX I think Frank would be hard pressed to find
someone else within Canada who could. Their service, from my experience, is
top notch and if it's the same Pentax guy that I'm thinking of, he'll scour
for spare parts etc. in order to fix a working body.
I hope it gets
I have quite some experience with XP2 Super (bought a couple of bulk
rolls so I had to use them all! :oT ) and I didn't quite reach the
same conclusion.
XP2 has indeed very large exposure latitude but it does so at the
expense of grain and tone compression. I initially bought it for
Mark,
http://www.markcassino.com/temp/IMGP8516.jpg
I'm glad I didn't missed this one (as I often do when someone starts a
thread in the middle of another one). Simply beautiful!
Bedo.
Isaac wrote:
Hello all. I'm wondering what everyone's opinion is on this. Is it worth
using? It is certainly much easier to acquire, but would I be happy with the
results? Also, are filters needed like with real bw film?
I tried one film a while back. Konica VX400, I think it was called. The
My experience with XP2 says that you were overexposing it too
much at ASA 200, compressing tonal scale quite a lot. I found it
best in the range ASA 320 to 640. Going down to 200-250 produces
very flat negative: all the highlights are compressed.
Yes, underexposing it creates grainier images.
Thanks for posting this, Godfrey!
-Original Message-
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 3:26 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: BH fire - follow up
I sent a note to Henry Posner of BH Photo/Video when I saw
the report about
Seems like winter is still here. There is 12 of snow on my truck and it is
still falling. That is after 3 weeks of Chinook like weather. I have a doctor's
appointment. I hope they will be there.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
Persnickety things electronics -- they have off days. :-)
Yeah - it's just like computers - they're not all ones and zeroes - g.
Fred
Highlights are compressed at 200 but that's a small price to pay for
clean shadows. Originally I was shooting XP2 at 400 ASA as the
recommended optimum sensitivity. Darker shadows than 2 EVs then
comes out with blotchy, irregular grain. And it's grain all right
not just noise introduced
Frank.
Only other place i can think of that might be able to do it if Komineks is
unablle is Sun
Camera Repair at
Keele and Steeles.(1 block east)
They fixed my SP500 and Yashica Mat 2 1/4. I was happy with both repairs.
Dave
If Kominek's can't
In a message dated 2/27/2005 11:53:08 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, Paul, since the lighting was primarily flash, what specifically caused
this look and how can it be avoided. Please remember, you're talking to a
guy who's never used a flash ;-))
Shel
===
From: Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Seems like winter is still here. There is 12 of snow on my truck and it is
still falling. That is after 3 weeks of Chinook like weather. I have a
doctor's
appointment. I hope they will be there.
We had the ubiquitous 1/2inch of snow and everything grinds
Thanks - I thought I started a new thread for that.
Does this mean that if I hit reply to to a random message and change the
subject line, it still sits in the old thread?
I guess that is what I get for being to lazy to just pull the address out of
my address book...
- MCC
- - - - - - - - - -
Expecting our weekly 6-10 of snow today and Tuesday.
Maybe i can finish off the roll of Tmax in the camera.g
Drive slow Tom.:-)
Dave
Seems like winter is still here. There is 12
of
snow on my truck and it is
still falling. That is after 3 weeks of Chinook
I would be more happy if they worked on more exposure latitude than more
megapixels. D has much less exposure latitude than Astia
100F. I can't take any pictures at noon like I could with Astia. :) Astia was
great, but digital wins in every other aspect except
exposure latitude for me. Maybe
I'm going to be shooting a high school play in a few
days. The lighting isn't great, and since I'll be
using the 80-320 zoom on my PZ-1p a fair amount I'd
like to keep the shutter speed respectable.
Would I be better off (1) using 800-speed film and
underexposing it by a stop; (2) using
Group,
Easily 2/3's of the list posts are winding up in my
BULK mail. I understand that opening and noting not
spam should~eventually~educate Yahoo as to what isn't
Spam.
Too tedious considering the number.
Anyone? Anyone?
Jack
__
Do you
What lenses were both of you using?
Godfrey
--- Marco Alpert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 27, 2005, at 2:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a 100% crop of a high contrast area that would reveal
any bloom:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3155211size=lg
Hmmm... and
If you shoot RAW and convert in PSCS, you should have plenty of exposure
latitude, at least as much as color negative film. It's a matter of exposing
correctly and using the four key controls: exposure, shadow, brightness, and
contrast.
Paul
I would be more happy if they worked on more
My test was shot with the K 28/3.5. I believe Marco was using the FA 135/2.8.
What lenses were both of you using?
Godfrey
--- Marco Alpert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 27, 2005, at 2:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a 100% crop of a high contrast area that would reveal
I set up an extra folder called PDML and set up a
filter to send anything from the list to that folder.
It also makes it easy to delete everything once I've
read what little I want to.
--- Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Group,
Easily 2/3's of the list posts are winding up in my
BULK
- Original Message -
From: Rick Womer
Subject: High-speed color print film question
I'm going to be shooting a high school play in a few
days. The lighting isn't great, and since I'll be
using the 80-320 zoom on my PZ-1p a fair amount I'd
like to keep the shutter speed respectable.
- Original Message -
From: Marco Alpert
Subject: Re: SMC Pentax 38/3.5 on *ist D
On Feb 27, 2005, at 2:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a 100% crop of a high contrast area that would reveal any
bloom:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3155211size=lg
Hmmm... and no bloom
- Original Message -
From: David Zaninovic
Subject: Re: Hmm.. ist DS competition?
I would be more happy if they worked on more exposure latitude than
more megapixels. D has much less exposure latitude than Astia
100F.
Where were you when some list members were insisting that digital
- Original Message -
From: Fred
Subject: Re: You have to 'love' electronics.
Yeah - it's just like computers - they're not all ones and
zeroes - g.
There are 10 kinds of people in the world, those that understand
binary, and those that don't.
William Robb
That is fine for photographs but for snapshots it does not work. For example
when I give the camera to my wife. :) I want the
camera to think for her as much as possible.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 10:49 AM
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis
Subject: Bulk inbox
Group,
Easily 2/3's of the list posts are winding up in my
BULK mail. I understand that opening and noting not
spam should~eventually~educate Yahoo as to what isn't
Spam.
Too tedious considering the number.
Anyone? Anyone?
Use a
Paul say again: was that the K28/3.5?
Shel
On Feb 27, 2005, at 2:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a 100% crop of a high contrast area that would reveal any bloom:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3155211size=lg
Sad you didn't had a good snipper rifle :-(
--- Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry, no political content... ;-)
just a quick one from the many photos I took at the
Bush-Putin summit.
http://www.frantisekvlcek.com/paw
This is from Hviezdoslav's square, the only place
those
The latitude of digital varies greatly in regard to the way one works.
- Original Message -
From: David Zaninovic
Subject: Re: Hmm.. ist DS competition?
I would be more happy if they worked on more exposure latitude than
more megapixels. D has much less exposure latitude
- Original Message -
From: David Zaninovic
Subject: Re: Hmm.. ist DS competition?
That is fine for photographs but for snapshots it does not work.
For example when I give the camera to my wife. :) I want the
camera to think for her as much as possible.
Poor women, such silly
Being happy shooting Astia at noon with great shadow and highlight detail and
bitching about scanning and waiting for slides to come
back from developing.
Where were you when some list members were insisting that digital had
15 stops of latitude.?
This digital exposure latitude looks more like Velvia 50 to me. That is fine
for controlled shooting but for noon snapshots it is
terrible, I hope that AF360 can control this contrast at least for people
snapshots.
- Original Message -
From: David Zaninovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Yep I made it and they were there. Funny thing is the weather channel is still
predicting 1-3 inches accumulation. I wonder if those guys ever go outdoors at all?
Aside to Mark Roberts: This stuff is headed your way, enjoy (grin).
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
- Original Message -
From: David Zaninovic
Subject: Re: Hmm.. ist DS competition?
This digital exposure latitude looks more like Velvia 50 to me.
That is fine for controlled shooting but for noon snapshots it is
terrible, I hope that AF360 can control this contrast at least for
people
On Feb 28, 2005, at 7:51 AM, William Robb wrote:
All it means is that Paul didn't reproduce an artifact that you were
able to create.
Go out and take pictures with the darned thing and stop looking for
problems that don't exist. You have a one year warranty, if you really
think after taking
If you are shooting jpegs, you are limiting things somewhat.
I also don't think digital has the latitude that film does, but I bow
to the knowledge of those who disagree with me on it.
Shooting jpegs limits some shadow detail but that detail is mostly noise in
my opinion.
Sure they do, but I think they're headquartered in Atlanta, and they
used up all their remote budgets on the last couple of blizzards and
last years Hurricanes.
Graywolf wrote:
Yep I made it and they were there. Funny thing is the weather channel
is still predicting 1-3 inches accumulation. I
Took me a minute to get that, I'm so ashamed. :-(
And I'm a computer guy, I deserve 1100100 lashes!
Don
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 9:52 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: You have to 'love' electronics.
The big limitation in shooting jpegs is that you don't have the exposure
control that you get when converting RAW in PSCS. There is no comparison
between jpeg and RAW. It's like night and day. Here's a shot I did yesterday to
test the 28/3.5 for another member. It includes snow in bright sun
OK, not so completely OT, as it could be of interest for these hoping for
use of this 12MPix sensor in future higher-end Pentax DSLR. And seeing the
results (even compared to FF EOS 1Ds mk II) I hope such a *ist{whatever}
will happen sooner than later :-)
- Original Message -
From: wendy beard
Subject: Re: PAW: Willy the Springer Spaniel
You think getting one to sit still is difficult? Try
it with three of 'em!
http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/36642090
I see you didn't manage it..
Nice lookin fellas.
It turns out we have a
Hello Rick,
Unless the spot lights are good, that is a very slow lens to be using.
I would lean towards the 1600 speed film. You do have the additional
issue of color balance. A filter will take care of that, but at the
cost of some light - seems like about a 1-2 stops. Another reason to
push
HAR!
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Fred
Subject: Re: You have to 'love' electronics.
Yeah - it's just like computers - they're not all ones and zeroes -
g.
There are 10
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 10:15:02AM -0500, Mark Cassino wrote:
Thanks - I thought I started a new thread for that.
Does this mean that if I hit reply to to a random message and change the
subject line, it still sits in the old thread?
That somewhat depends on the software being used to read
Good highlight and shadow detail, I would be happy with those results.
But this was not done at most contrasty time of the
day, right ? Do you think that jpg would remove some of the hightlight detail
or it makes a difference only in shadows ? You have
some realy nice pictures on
tyr again...
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've struggled to get a decent picture of Willy
for
quite some time. Yesterday I got him to sit still
on
the stairs for a few moments. He's getting on in
years now, but he's still quite handsome. Shot him
with the FA 50/1.4 at f8 and a
Nice shots, Bruce!
Yeah, I am regretting that I didn't shell out for an
istD...but I was expecting the next generation to
come along this spring or summer.
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is a play that I shot last year on digital -
mix of 800 and 1600
ISO, some lenses were as
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would be more happy if they worked on more exposure
latitude than
more megapixels. D has much less exposure latitude than
Astia
100F.
Where were you when some list members were insisting that
digital had
15 stops of latitude.?
Not 15 but
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This digital exposure latitude looks more like Velvia 50 to
me.
That is fine for controlled shooting but for noon snapshots
it is
terrible, I hope that AF360 can control this contrast at
least for
people snapshots.
If you are shooting jpegs,
Is that a signed or unsigned integer?
Godfrey
--- Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Took me a minute to get that, I'm so ashamed. :-(
And I'm a computer guy, I deserve 1100100 lashes!
Don
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday,
Hi Rick.
I have only used Fuji's 1600 speed film a few times on some indoor horse shows,
no spots,
just
diffused light from side windows and a bit from some skylights.
I was pleasantly suprized at the out come. Grainy yes,but not all that bad if i
could get
a jump with
some light on it. I
In the early hours of Sunday, my family and I returned from a one week
vacation in Israel.
The link below is to six images, one for each of the full days we
spent there.
http://www.oksne.net/paw/israel/index.html
Many, many thanks to PDML'er Boris Liberman and family for their
hospitality.
--- Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
somebody here is also shooting horses and similar
with D2H, which has
an ambient light WB sensor, which I heard is
designed to detect
flicker in fluorescents, do you exhibit same
problem?
I don't have a D2H or shoot horses, but I have had
lots of
Hi,
Monday, February 28, 2005, 6:44:55 PM, Jostein wrote:
In the early hours of Sunday, my family and I returned from a one week
vacation in Israel.
The link below is to six images, one for each of the full days we
spent there.
http://www.oksne.net/paw/israel/index.html
Very
Hey gang.
I thought i would comment on a few of this months Pug's. Once again, a great
job, and some
lovely
pictures. Planning on commenting on more later, just these for now,:
Playing out side the Church
by Gianfranco Irlanda
Lovely BW
I'd pick Fujipress 800 / Portra 800 - no push procedure - with a
flash 36 and above guide number. The combo will give you a
respectable 18 m shooting range. You can add a full exposure stop by
lowering the speed to 1/125 and pan. This may give also some
interesting trail effects.
Some nice pictures Jostein.
As Bob already mentioned, i to like the way you have framed up the colums and
the smoke
stacks. The
window shot and the second sunset are also fantastic. I remember working in
Oman,the sun
seemed
to set in just seconds.:-)
Dave
Thanks David. This was shot at about one in the afternoon under hazy sun.
However, the snow was quite bright, brighter in fact, than it appears in the
photo. I think a jpeg would have blown out highlights and lost shadow detail if
it was exposed the same as this shot. The key to RAW is in how
Thanks Dave. It's nice to see someone commenting on the PUG. I have to get back
there myself.
Paul
Hey gang.
I thought i would comment on a few of this months Pug's. Once again, a great
job, and some
lovely
pictures. Planning on
Nice shot, Wendy. It almost looks like a painting. Beautiful.
Paul
tyr again...
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've struggled to get a decent picture of Willy
for
quite some time. Yesterday I got him to sit still
on
the stairs for a few moments. He's getting on in
years
Great stuff, Jostein. Love the last one from the Mediterranean and the one of
your daughter in Jerusalem.
Paul
In the early hours of Sunday, my family and I returned from a one week
vacation in Israel.
The link below is to six images, one for each of the full days we
spent there.
wb I don't have a D2H or shoot horses, but I have had
wb lots of trouble with indoor lighting, including shots
wb having the colour shift visible over half of the
wb frame.
Now that's very strange! Especially as i't is mirrored in the two
photos! I assume the camera worked fine in other venues?
Thank you ! I will try these tips and will do some more investigation on raw
vs jpg highlight/shadow detail, there might be hope
afterall. :)
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: Hmm.. ist DS
Thanks, Alin. I prefer to shoot without flash to
avoid distracting audience and performers. I was
considering shooting the dress rehearsal with flash
and my 24-90 set wide from up on the stage, but I have
to work...
--- Alin Flaider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd pick Fujipress 800 / Portra
Those are lovely shots. Not at all your typical
postcard stuff!
--- Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the early hours of Sunday, my family and I
returned from a one week
vacation in Israel.
The link below is to six images, one for each of the
full days we
spent there.
RW Would I be better off (1) using 800-speed film and
RW underexposing it by a stop; (2) using 800-speed film
RW and asking the lab to push it; or (3) using 1600 speed
RW film?
Both Superia 800 and 1600 do fine. Better yet (marginally) are Press
800 and 1600. All by Fuji. Grain? What size of
Frantisek opined:
And if you miss digital, digital has as much blue noise under tungsten
lighting as the worst film, IF you whitebalance it so it looks like
daylight. Heavy postpro is required for noise reduction. For best
results with digital, I think classic CC filters are needed. remember,
Simon King wrote:
Thanks Gonz,
No, I'm not paranoid about getting exactly 3000ma, I just wanted to get
a ballpark figure on what the Pentax adaptor drew so I could get a
similar spec. I just think it's ridiculous to spend an extra $50 just to
have the word Pentax on a power adaptor.
I suggest
Frantisek opined:
And if you miss digital, digital has as much blue noise under tungsten
lighting as the worst film, IF you whitebalance it so it looks like
daylight. Heavy postpro is required for noise reduction. For best
results with digital, I think classic CC filters are needed.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/27/2005 4:06:30 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tie-breaker :-)
What single thing do you consider to be the most important element of
photography?
==
The front element.
Silver.
Without trying to be humorous (although sometimes I'm humorous without trying
g), I'd have to say the most important element of photography is light. In
fact, light is not only the most important element, it is the essence of
photography.
Paul
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated
What single thing do you consider to be the most important element
of
photography?
==
The front element.
Silver.
Pretty girls
Great idea!Funny noone thought of this before...
BTW: The MZ-S can easily be carried this way without a Grip Strap. The
body/handle is very so well designed - I could carry mine using just two
fingers!
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig
It's very nice. I never use the neck strap at all, anyway.
My conserns are two things, though:
1) The tripod mount!
2) Is the base plate strong enough!
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Jim Hemenway [mailto:[EMAIL
--- Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wb I don't have a D2H or shoot horses, but I have
had
wb lots of trouble with indoor lighting, including
shots
wb having the colour shift visible over half of the
wb frame.
Now that's very strange! Especially as i't is
mirrored in the two
photos!
Those are interesting. Are they taken from aproximately the same point and time
of day? If they are it is a camera problem no a lighting problem becase the
color cast has shifted from one side to the other. Of course there could be
window to either side and one was shot in the early morning and
pcn *ist D, tungsten WB setting, ISO 800, f1.4 @ 1/45th:
pcn http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3145171size=lg
Oh I know, Paul, it almost looks like I am clashing into your opinions
;-)
Perhaps I wrote it confusingly. I was hinting at that the WB
feature of digital is not miraculous,
Photography is a very light art
På 28. feb. 2005 kl. 22.04 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Without trying to be humorous (although sometimes I'm humorous without
trying g), I'd have to say the most important element of photography
is light. In fact, light is not only the most important element, it is
What single thing do you consider to be the most important element
of
photography?
==
The front element.
Silver.
Pretty girls
Rubber.
OOPS! wrong mailing list
--
Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No problem, Frantisek. I enjoy the debates and never take any of it personally.
I don't know enough about the way white balance is controlled to answer
intelligently. But my 200W bulbs are conventional tungsten floodlights, not
photofloods. Other low-light tungsten efforts have pleased me. I
wendy beard mused:
I don't have a D2H or shoot horses, but I have had
lots of trouble with indoor lighting, including shots
having the colour shift visible over half of the
frame.
http://www.muddypawz.net/dfst3/images/127_2703.jpg
http://www.muddypawz.net/dfst3/images/127_2708.jpg
Cotty wrote:
On 27/2/05, Jostein, discombobulated, unleashed:
Just checking in again.
I suppose it's already known what I've been up to... :-)
Welcome back - and what have you been up to?
Cheers,
Cotty
Thanks, mate.
Your post never reached me, I found it in the archives just now.
Haven't been up
- Original Message -
From: Christian
Subject: Re: Book Competition
Rubber.
Did you mean latex?
Hmm, reply didn't appear again. (see below)
--- Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that's very strange! Especially as i't is
mirrored in the two
photos! I assume the camera worked fine in other
venues? Was it just
these two, or a whole bunch from that venue? It
might also be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Playing out side the Church
by Gianfranco Irlanda
Lovely BW shot. Yes it fits the theme quite well.:-)
Nice shadow detail and the highlights not to bad either.
Hi Dave,
Thanks for the kind words!
The PUG picture is a scan of a small minilab print, which was
This must be one of those YMMV issues...
I never shot enough XP2 to form a conclusive opinion, and I never did any
testing of it. I just shot a handful of rolls over a while and decided I
like regular silver. Having said that - after shooting as ISO 400 once, I
dropped it to ISO 200. I found
Fuji Superia 1600 ASA has finer grain than the 800 ASA!!
Brilliant film for low light:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/5613890/
Regards
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Rick Womer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 28.
Fra: Jim Hemenway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Has anyone here tried one of these grips on a DS?
Item 3877946031 on eBay
Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's very nice. I never use the neck strap at all, anyway.
My conserns are two things, though:
1) The tripod mount!
2) Is the base
William Robb wrote on 2/28/2005, 4:46 PM:
- Original Message -
From: Christian
Subject: Re: Book Competition
Rubber.
Did you mean latex?
Depends on your geographic location.
--
Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DAMMIT I didn't ignore it!
--
Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
By the time I'd moved to XP2 Super and T400CN as my only film
emulsions, I was doing all digital scanning to digital print
process. Overexposure down in the ASA 200 range created
negatives that ran too dense for good scanning practice, a less
dense negative renders better results.
Of course,
Thanks for the link.
Are you sure they got rexcued from the recent fire at BH?
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 28. februar 2005 23:15
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne:
Non-Pentax equipment.
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/channel/52/extra/new/display/2677189
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/3400/display/2677300
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/3400/display/2677226
All the stuff I've posted so far.
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/mypics/529253
1 - 100 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
