I'm not getting my hopes up (well, maybe a little), but BH currently
lists it as Out Of Stock instead of Backordered, and Adorama has a
note claiming This Item is on the way to our warehouse and is expected
in a few days.
Glenn
glenn murphy wrote:
I'm not getting my hopes up (well, maybe a little), but BH currently
lists it as Out Of Stock instead of Backordered, and Adorama has a
note claiming This Item is on the way to our warehouse and is expected
in a few days.
:( I gave up and cancelled my BH order last week.
On 6/5/05, Amita Guha, discombobulated, unleashed:
www.fancyapint.com - rates pubs throughout London. And you can download the
site to your Palm. :) That's what I'm going to do...not sure if I'll
actually use it though...
Hey Amita, you carry a Palm?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
Pain? Tension? Nervous headache?
For fast-acting relief, try PHC.
http://www.philosophers.co.uk/games/check.htm
Mr. BW of South London says I tried PHC, and now I only have 13%
philosophical tension.
Great picture! You have to smile back to these guys.
Henk
-Original Message-
From: P. J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 May, 2005 4:17 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO -- Characters (For something completely different.)
Photographed at an event I
On 7/5/05, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Pain? Tension? Nervous headache?
For fast-acting relief, try PHC.
http://www.philosophers.co.uk/games/check.htm
Mr. BW of South London says I tried PHC, and now I only have 13%
philosophical tension.
33% low to medium
Pass me the valium.
Hello PDML,
I found a SMC A 20/2,8 to buy for around 300.-¤. Is this a good price if
in good condition?
If anyone could help me and tell some experiences with that lens and if
it's worth the price, I'd be grateful.
Thanks,
Johannes.
I only have 13% and disagree with the test in one of the
contradictions, so I guess I´m pretty relaxed .-)
DagT
På 7. mai. 2005 kl. 10.15 skrev Bob W:
Pain? Tension? Nervous headache?
For fast-acting relief, try PHC.
http://www.philosophers.co.uk/games/check.htm
Mr. BW of South London says I
BW Personally, I have never really understood why people feel the need to
BW categorise things as art or not-art, or even as good, bad and indifferent
BW art. I would rather approach the object or performance in question, and
BW examine my own reaction to it, the reactions of other people, and its
I know I'm not very good at monochrome conversions yet. I think I was a
bit heavy handed with the channel mixing on the sky - the mottled
texture bothers me. But this process makes you look at photos
differently, so that's got to have some worth.
Superb picture, Derby. I imagine you will continue to tweak until you
reach almost perfection, but I'm sure it will repay whatever time you
spend on it.
John
On Sat, 07 May 2005 11:23:44 +0100, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I know I'm not very good at monochrome conversions yet. I
Hi,
Leica Gallery Prague finally succeeded in organising second Salgado
exhibition here, after several years and aftere our damned
President (_not_ Havel!) declared Prague Castle unfit for any art
like Salgado or World music festival... ousting Leica Gallery out
of it.
So, they
Bob W wrote:
Pain? Tension? Nervous headache?
For fast-acting relief, try PHC.
http://www.philosophers.co.uk/games/check.htm;
13%. I may be full of $#!T but I'm consistent.
I enjoyed that Bob. Thanks for posting it.
Tom Reese
I'll have to see the eye doctor vbg. Seriously, I only trust myself
to evaluate prints in bright light with my best reading glasses.
However, the degradation of my eyes hasn't really affected my ability
to focus. The diopter adjustment on the *istD dials me in pretty close,
and it's fairly
I don't think it was ever sold as in a kit.
David Oswald wrote:
Francis Alviar wrote:
Just grabbed a FA 28-70mm f/4 off of that auction
site.
It belonged to a former list member (I think) Gary
Murphy.
I've been reading comments for this lens from Stan's
site and it's been getting good reviews.
at times like this, if i think it's likely i will encounter fast moving
birds, i have the camera set on Continuous AF mode. uses batteries and only
works on the center AF sensor, but it helps.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
one of the first things you learn about any art or craft when you go into
business is that if you can't stop when it's good enough, your business
fails. hundreds of thousands of professional photographers learn it or fail.
the difference is that what is good enough for them is far above many of
Yes this is a good price if it's in good condition. I spent a long time
trying to find one in good condition
at that low a price. It's even a very good lens.
Johannes Schwab wrote:
Hello PDML,
I found a SMC A 20/2,8 to buy for around 300.-¤. Is this a good price
if in good condition?
If
I'm amazed that I only scored 20% on their tension quotient since the
deck is stacked against
any complex understanding of the issues. I kept reading their questions
and saying, yes, or no with
an explanation or caviot, or I want an I don't know option. If I took
it seriously the test would
G'day Shel,
I like it.
I thought the same as others that it might look good in BW so I did a
conversion that I thought mimicked the effect of a red filter. With
darkened sky water the hull really pops out.
But on comparing it against the original colour version I can't say I
prefer one over
On 5/7/05, Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob W wrote:
Pain? Tension? Nervous headache?
For fast-acting relief, try PHC.
http://www.philosophers.co.uk/games/check.htm;
13%. I may be full of $#!T but I'm consistent.
I enjoyed that Bob. Thanks for posting it.
MIssed the
On 5/7/05, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm amazed that I only scored 20% on their tension quotient since the
deck is stacked against
any complex understanding of the issues. I kept reading their questions
and saying, yes, or no with
an explanation or caviot, or I want an I don't
On 5/6/05, Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Got this shot within 10 minutes of leaving GFM.
*istD, Tamron 75-300 at 300, ISO 400
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3340897
Bill
Terrific shot, Bill!
NIce dof, the Turkey's sharp enough against the OOF background. You
got him
Yeah, that's the problem of course. Many of the question simply can't
be properly answered with a yes/no or agree/disagree choice.
Agreed. But I got a 0% tension so my conclusion was that the test is
quite awesome.
Cheers,
David
You have so little stress you're in a coma, or maybe just asleep.
David Nelson wrote:
Yeah, that's the problem of course. Many of the question simply can't
be properly answered with a yes/no or agree/disagree choice.
Agreed. But I got a 0% tension so my conclusion was that the test is
quite
P. J. Alling wrote:
You have so little stress you're in a coma, or maybe just asleep.
Philosophically speaking that is...
David Nelson wrote:
Yeah, that's the problem of course. Many of the question simply can't
be properly answered with a yes/no or agree/disagree choice.
Agreed. But I got a 0%
On 5/7/05, David Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed. But I got a 0% tension so my conclusion was that the test is
quite awesome.
Ah, but what makes you think that 0% tension is a good thing? Don't
you think a bit (like around 13%) of tension is necessary in life?
All things in moderation
Lol (-:
Not so - it indicates that I have non-contradictory views/beliefs (and
if you believe that you'll believe this: Where there is little or no
tension between beliefs, little intellectual effort is required to
balance both beliefs it's a manifestation of my laziness (-:)
Cheers,
David
Got a little gig to do so I will miss some of my education.
Tan if you need to contact me it will need to be after that.
Kind regards and good health
Kevin
--
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.
Hi,
This looks to be a great photo to work with in BW. I agree that the
conversion is heavy-handed, both in the sky as you noted and in the
contrast and tonality of the rest of the photo. Keep working on it and you
may end up with something that's outstanding.
If you want suggestions from
Nobody in their right mind would leave the US and buy camera
equipment in the UK!
--
Cheers,
Bob
Agreed. :)
Hi David ...
Your comments gave me an idea for further tweaking, so I tried a BW
version with a darker sky and a few other adjustments. The dark sky is a
nice effect. Thanks.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: David Savage
I like it.
I thought the same as others that it might look good in
I found a SMC A 20/2,8 to buy for around 300.-¤. Is this a good price if
in good condition? If anyone could help me and tell some experiences
with that lens and if it's worth the price, I'd be grateful.
Yes this is a good price if it's in good condition. [snip] It's even a
very good lens.
Thanks for the kind comments, Frank. However in all honesty the *istD was
set on auto, so everything is just as the camera decided it should be. I
took about 6 exposures in the 10 seconds or so while he left the feeding
area and went across the road.
BTW, these were taken about where PDML
Hi,
I've seen Salgado's prints. I don't know off hand what the dimensions are
for A1, although iirc, they are quite large. His prints that measure 24 x
36 or so are outstanding in terms of quality and tonality, even when viewed
close up.
The format of the show is most interesting. Bring the
I paid 225 USD a couple years ago. It wasn't exactly in mint condition. 300
Euro is appr. 385 USD.
That'a a little expensive even if it's MINT. I'd saay the right price
should be around 300-325 USD.
It's a bruilliant lens. It's one of my favorites - especially after I got
the D. Even before then,
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just can't stand that good enough
attitude that we see so much of today.
I agree with some of what you say, Shel, but this is a bit much, don't
you think? Being a middle aged cranky old fart, I get the same feeling
sometimes, but I'd be willing the
P. J. Alling schrieb:
Yes this is a good price if it's in good condition. I spent a long
time trying to find one in good condition
at that low a price. It's even a very good lens.
Hi Peter,
so you would prefer it instead of taking a Tokina 17/3,5 for around 200.-¤?
If yes, I would assume the
Carolina the bear and her new cub, Boomer.
http://groups.msn.com/BillOwensPhotos/shoebox.msnw?action=ShowPhotoPhotoID=90
Bill
It was, with the ZX-5n. As a buyer I bought the ZX-5n QD kits with the
28-70mm f/4 as the kit lens.
P. J. Alling wrote:
I don't think it was ever sold as in a kit.
David Oswald wrote:
Francis Alviar wrote:
Just grabbed a FA 28-70mm f/4 off of that auction
site.
It belonged to a former list
The young lady at the local Wal-Mart Minilab as so happy. She told me she had a
hard time getting all the yellow out of my photo of a tan hat...
Wal-Mart print:
http://meanderings.graywolfphoto.com/_images/walmart-hat.jpg
Uncorrected scan of negative:
...BH is selling an FA version for 499.95 USD - I guess it's new.
Man, I'd love to have this one!
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 7. maj 2005 16:40
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Re: OT: Philosophical health check
I'm amazed that I only scored 20% on their tension quotient since the deck
is stacked against
any complex understanding of the issues. I kept reading their questions
and saying, yes, or no with
an
Professionally Acceptable
The problem is that most professional photographers do not do professionally
acceptable work. All it takes, in the US at least, to be a professional
photographer is a camera and registering a DBA with county (If you use your own
name in stead of a made up name for your
Very interesting. So, the is realy yellowish, right?
When shooting slides, colour temperature is an issue too, I believe :-).
Jens
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 7. maj 2005 17:24
Til:
- Original Message -
From: Graywolf
Subject: Re: Digital profligacy
The young lady at the local Wal-Mart Minilab as so happy. She told me she
had a hard time getting all the yellow out of my photo of a tan hat...
Wal-Mart print:
Hello Derby,
For me, right now, it seems like there is more to do. It has the
makings of a nice photo, but the conversion is too much. This one
certainly looks worth the effort. I look forward to seeing more of
it.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, May 7, 2005, 3:23:44 AM, you wrote:
DC I
Pretty much so as I do photography and desk top publishing in my job.
Powell
At 10:28 AM 06/05/2005 , Shel wrote:
OK, that begs the question: Why would you have needed all this equipment
anyway? Would you have needed the same equipment? For example, before
using Photoshop and scanning (or
Thanks William!
Bill
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2005 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: Digital profligacy
- Original Message -
From: Graywolf
Subject: Re: Digital profligacy
The young lady at the local
Well there are two sides of photography.
There is the technical side. Just as an artist has to know what brushes and
paints to use and what their effect are on the canvas, so a good photographer
has to know his tools and how to use them effectively.
There is the meaning side. I use meaning
- Original Message -
From: Graywolf
Subject: Re: Digital profligacy
Professionally Acceptable
The problem is that most professional photographers do not do
professionally acceptable work.
It's not just photographers. I am giving an older couple a hand by
rebuilding their wheelchair
On Fri, 6 May 2005, Powell Hargrave wrote:
I have spent a lot more money on photography since going digital. Not
counting computers, printers, monitors etc. I would have needed these
anyway.
What then?
Kostas
Well the cameras to start with. Five digitals of increasing ability. All
You are of course correct about that, Bill.
But the fact the highlights are all burned out in the print but not the negative is
pretty damning. As I said if the print mattered it was my job to insist that it be done
over correctly. Also I could have specified No Corrections on the envelope.
William Robb wrote:
This brings up the interesting concept that the photo finisher should
what the inside of your house looks like, and should automatically
know what colour things are, given no references regarding it.
Her exposure is off by a couple of buttons (too light), but there is
Well a contractor is liable if his work is not to code. Most places require him
to post a bond to get his license. So it is fairly easy to get you money back
for small jobs (the bond won't cover anything substancial, and fly-by-night
contractors usually have nothing else you can get to).
47%, uptight little [EMAIL PROTECTED]@@# aren't I? :-(
Don
-Original Message-
From: Tom Reese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2005 6:03 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Philosophical health check
Bob W wrote:
Pain? Tension? Nervous headache?
33%
I need another drink.
Dave S
On 5/7/05, Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob W wrote:
Pain? Tension? Nervous headache?
For fast-acting relief, try PHC.
http://www.philosophers.co.uk/games/check.htm;
13%. I may be full of $#!T but I'm consistent.
I enjoyed that Bob. Thanks
Last eBay sale $330.00 plus shipping
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=48558item=7511527617
rd=1
glenn murphy wrote:
I'm not getting my hopes up (well, maybe a little), but BH currently
lists it as Out Of Stock instead of Backordered, and Adorama has a
note claiming This
Rather one sided views the authors have.
For instance brain dead, and continued existance of the spirit does not
necessarily contradict each other. One is of the body, the other is not. It is
like the the computer is burned out, but we can not get rid of it because we
want to keep the program
On Fri, 6 May 2005, William Robb wrote:
Before automation, you had no choice about learning the technical end of
photography. It was part of the game. You learned how to adjust an aperture
and shutter speed to match a needle in the viewfinder.
snip
Automatic exposure does not necessarily
I also scored 33, so I'll drink to that as well
Dan M
David Savage wrote:
33%
I need another drink.
I had one briefly, and got a 24-90 to replace it.
Watch for vignetting at the wide end.
Rick
--- Francis Alviar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just grabbed a FA 28-70mm f/4 off of that auction
site.
It belonged to a former list member (I think) Gary
Murphy.
I've been reading comments for
Well, just matching the needle and using auto exposure is exactly the same
thing. Now intelligently adjusting for different lighting, say back lighting,
is easier with a manual camera than with an automatic camera. With a manual
camera you just change the f-stop or shutter speed a couple of
- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
Subject: Re: Digital profligacy
On Fri, 6 May 2005, William Robb wrote:
Before automation, you had no choice about learning the technical end of
photography. It was part of the game. You learned how to adjust an
aperture
and shutter speed
- Original Message -
From: Powell Hargrave
Subject: Re: FA 35/2 status at BH and Adorama
Last eBay sale $330.00 plus shipping
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=48558item=7511527617
rd=1
This makes a point that people who always wait for the best price will
sometimes
- Original Message -
From: Graywolf
Subject: Re: Digital profligacy
You are of course correct about that, Bill.
Of course I am.
We wouldn't want it any other way...
HAR!!
The fact is that really excellent color printers are far and few between.
That was so 25 years ago as well as
- Original Message -
From: Graywolf
Subject: Re: Digital profligacy
Well a contractor is liable if his work is not to code. Most places
require him to post a bond to get his license. So it is fairly easy to get
you money back for small jobs (the bond won't cover anything substancial,
- Original Message -
From: Don Sanderson
Subject: RE: OT: Philosophical health check
47%, uptight little [EMAIL PROTECTED]@@# aren't I? :-(
Oh my, you are. The best I was able to do was 27%.
William Robb
successful serious fine art photographers are just as aware and just the
same when it comes time to staying in business. if you don't know when to
stop fondling the bits, paint, chisel or whatever, you won't be in business
very long, especially if you are very good.
Herb
- Original
Mellow out dudes!
7%
Powell
I'm still waiting for mine.. every day I look at the 200$ 28-105, and
think, hmm, maybe I should just give up on the 35 and save myself some
money?
I guess I'll wait another week or so, I'm miffed that BH still hasn't
responded to my 2 week old question about when I might see it. I gather
that
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 03:01:10PM -0400, Jon Paul Schelter (R* Toronto) wrote:
I guess I'll wait another week or so, I'm miffed that BH still hasn't
responded to my 2 week old question about when I might see it. I gather
that they haven't had a good answer, but a non-automated reply to my
On 5/7/05, Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carolina the bear and her new cub, Boomer.
http://groups.msn.com/BillOwensPhotos/shoebox.msnw?action=ShowPhotoPhotoID=90
Bill
Little bear cubs are so cute! It's easy to forget that they grow up
into big bears that can rip your face off with
On 5/7/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
This idiot not only didn't follow code, he created a really unsafe situation
for a couple of people who trusted him to do the job, and had no way to
check up on whether the job was done right.
William (Mike Holmes, Western Division) Robb
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault
Subject: Re: Digital profligacy
A
Holmes on Homes. One of my favourite TV shows. As soon as you said
that nothing was up to code, I thought of Mike. When I read your
signature, I howled! vbg
I watch it to feel lucky.
At least my
On 5/6/05, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Photographed at an event I attended. Posted the URL earlier to the
LONDON PDML thread.
http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PESO_--_characters.html
Pentax *ist-D 43ltd. ISO 800
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
On 5/7/05, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Love it! For some reason that I'm not able to articulate, I like the
grouping of two guys and one guy separate. I find that intriguing.
snip
Oh yeah. It would, of course, look much better in bw...
vbg
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a
I'm not personally familiar with the Tokina. For the difference in
price it's worth looking at. However the Pentax will almost
certainly have superior flair handling due to the SMC.
Johannes Schwab wrote:
P. J. Alling schrieb:
Yes this is a good price if it's in good condition. I spent a
Every time I saw it in a store it was an after market upgrade.
David Oswald wrote:
It was, with the ZX-5n. As a buyer I bought the ZX-5n QD kits with
the 28-70mm f/4 as the kit lens.
P. J. Alling wrote:
I don't think it was ever sold as in a kit.
David Oswald wrote:
Francis Alviar wrote:
It was an awards night for a semi-civic organization. The dress code as
you can see was eclectic.
frank theriault wrote:
On 5/6/05, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Photographed at an event I attended. Posted the URL earlier to the
LONDON PDML thread.
SB I've seen Salgado's prints. I don't know off hand what the dimensions are
SB for A1, although iirc, they are quite large. His prints that measure 24 x
SB 36 or so are outstanding in terms of quality and tonality, even when viewed
SB close up.
A4 is similar to legal size, and A1 is eight times
Saturday, May 7, 2005, 3:28:48 PM, P. wrote:
PJA You have so little stress you're in a coma, or maybe just asleep.
No, David is just longing for the Fjords ;-)
Good light!
fra
PJA any complex understanding of the issues. I kept reading their questions
PJA and saying, yes, or no with
PJA an explanation or caviot, or I want an I don't know option. If I took
PJA it seriously the test would have caused more
PJA stress than I have normally...
Yes. But then most people
If BH says a lens is backordered, they will almost certainly have
some in stock sooner or later. If a lens is unavailable, they take it
off their web site. I haven't seen them fail yet when it comes to
delivering on their promises. For some, it may be worth the wait. I
waited for both my
I had a great time at the opening of my little gallery show last night.
Because it was timed to coincide with the gallery tour night, the
turnout was terrific. Somewhere around 300 people saw the show. Chief
among these was Ken Waller, who surprised me (and delighted me) with a
visit. I must
F Definitely. Do you know if more of his work from Genesis series is
F available to view at least on the web somewhere? I think some of it
F was printed in Guardian, so in their archives?
Funny, answering myself... but I just learned that Guardian published
a third installment from the
on 6.05.2005 14:13, Pål Jensen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure, the eyepiece is of plastic but isn't that true for all slr's made today?
Eypiece in MZ-S is made of coated glass - I've checked this by knocking at
that with metal screwdriver - produced sound couldn't come from plastic part
:-)
Sylwiusz wrote:
on 6.05.2005 14:13, Pål Jensen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure, the eyepiece is of plastic but isn't that true for all slr's made today?
Eypiece in MZ-S is made of coated glass - I've checked this by knocking at
that with metal screwdriver - produced sound couldn't come
Beautiful images. Thanks for posting. I think number 8 is my favorite.
I wonder what the lensing was on these.
Paul
On May 7, 2005, at 5:58 PM, Frantisek wrote:
F Definitely. Do you know if more of his work from Genesis series is
F available to view at least on the web somewhere? I think some of
Hi Listers,
Just a quick note - sat here with Rob Brigham, Jostein, and Stan having a
late night pint in the hotel.
Full report soon, but before then, you may see a pic of us all on the Eye
- Paul Stenquist will kindly post a link to it soon (unless he's busy
with his show ;-)
Long day, lots of
The big get together at the London Eye took place earlier today. Cotty
mailed me a pic of everyone that he shot with his Pismo. (Ignore the
title, where it says by Paul Stenquist. I'm not taking the blame for
this one g. It's all Cotty's) Cotty tells me the event was a big
success. I'm sure
Knarf, my only point was that photos are taken by people. What make of
equipment used is irrelevant if the operator doesn't have a clue to the
technical aesthetic aspects.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent:
Thanks for the comments, guys. Gives me incentive to keep going.
Shel, the shot was on Fuji S-400. So I thought I could wring out more
detail in the clouds. Started again from scratch, with two scans, one
exposed for the sky, one for the land.
Separate curve adjustments for each. Next, I think
Thanks, Paul, and a major thank you to Cotty for organising another really
excellent event. Pics to follow.
John
On Sat, 07 May 2005 23:20:29 +0100, Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The big get together at the London Eye took place earlier today. Cotty
mailed me a pic of everyone
Cotty wrote:
Hi Listers,
Just a quick note - sat here with Rob Brigham, Jostein, and Stan having a
late night pint in the hotel.
Full report soon, but before then, you may see a pic of us all on the Eye
- Paul Stenquist will kindly post a link to it soon (unless he's busy
with his show ;-)
Long
Wow, just look at that barrel distortion...
;o)
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 May 2005 23:20
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: London PDML, first pic
The big get together at the London Eye took place earlier
Superb. Can't wait to see them in an exhibition. Thanks for posting.
--
Cheers,
Bob
Funny, answering myself... but I just learned that Guardian published
a third installment from the work-in-progress Genesis series...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/arts/salgado/0,15021,1294976,00.html
On 7/5/05, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
The big get together at the London Eye took place earlier today. Cotty
mailed me a pic of everyone that he shot with his Pismo
The true meaning of that line cannot be divulged now as more info will be
released in due course ;-)
Cheers,
Great news, Paul. I'm sorry that I didn't make it, I had planned on it, but
I had a meeting in Fremont Friday, and after 7 1/2 hours of driving and a
four hour meeting, all I could think of was getting home. I'm glad to see
it'll hang for a few more weeks, I'm going to get over there so I can
On 7/5/05, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
I had a great time at the opening of my little gallery show last night.
Because it was timed to coincide with the gallery tour night, the
turnout was terrific. Somewhere around 300 people saw the show. Chief
among these was Ken Waller, who
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
