Looks like it might be Fulham who are touring.
http://www.soccerhall.org/news/2005/MLSAll-StarGameAnnounced_382005.htm
Fulham is the club that Mohammed al-Fayed owns. He is also the owner of
Harrods.
http://www.fulhamfc.com/
You might want to get bit of practice in before you go to the match,
Hi Bruce,
I think the scene was darker, but I'm trying to remember back to 1969. I
made three shots of the scene, bracketed a bit, and decided to print the
neg that I did to see a specific effect and to explore and express a
certain feeling and interpretation.
Shel
[Original Message]
From:
On 5/6/05, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
I shot a car this morning for a magazine article. It's an extremely
rare '66 Plymouth Belvedere HP2. This was the car that Chrysler built
to convince NASCAR that the hemi was a production engine. It was a very
basic car with vinyl bench
No idea if it will come to fruition, but
there's a major league soccer all-star type of game here in July.
I'm going to try to get a sideline press pass
Would 300mm be enough for soccer? 400mm?
Would a zoom be more suitable? What range?
Collin
If you need some inspiration ;-)
P. J. Alling wrote on 05.06.05 23:55:
A marketers decision is more likely, (Is the Nikon or Canon default the
same I wonder?)
In the Nikon default is front wheel for aperture, back for shutter. But you
can change it easily in custom functions and/or change function of one of
the wheels to
Ist-D is at 850 euro body only at www.digital-shopping.fr if anybody's
interested.
Ist-Ds is at 750 euro BTW.
Hope it helps someone :)
--
Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX and KR-10x ...
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, John Whittingham wrote:
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 17:38:19 +0100 (BST)
Subject: Re: Focusing screens - NOT MX, LX
Kostas (*really* happy with the panorama lines in the Z-1p, sans voir
the results
Not sure what PESO stands for, but I get the idea that if one wants to
share a photo with the group, this is the way to do it. Please correct
me if I'm actually asking to be debagged and radished instead.
I am a strange guy, I bought my *ist DS so I could mount my classic M42
lenses on it and
--- Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interestingly enough, Boz does not have the one that came with my
Z1-p, FM-60 (page 112 of the manual). Can't tell the difference from
FP-60, by the way.
FM-60 has the spot meter circle, but FP-60 doesn't.
Alan Chan
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Alan Chan wrote:
FM-60 has the spot meter circle, but FP-60 doesn't.
Thanks. I should be able to read the description :-) I don't have the
manual and Pentax's PDF does not display the screen look properly.
Not that I am not happy it exists...
Kostas
PESO = Picture Every So Often.
You got it right, the pic too.
Great shot!!
Don
-Original Message-
From: Wigwam Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 4:43 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Pentax *ist DS at the Ball Game
Not sure what PESO
Hi Shel
A good and interesting photo for me.
Assuming how full of rich (gold) colors the church is I would like to see a
comparison in color to your b/w shot.
I think I would prefer color here...
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
On 6/6/05, Wigwam Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure what PESO stands for, but I get the idea that if one wants to
share a photo with the group, this is the way to do it. Please correct
me if I'm actually asking to be debagged and radished instead.
I am a strange guy, I bought my *ist
From: Wigwam Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/06/06 Mon AM 09:42:36 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Pentax *ist DS at the Ball Game
Not sure what PESO stands for, but I get the idea that if one wants to
share a photo with the group, this is the way to do it. Please
I am a strange guy, I bought my *ist DS so I could mount my classic M42
lenses on it and use it like my Bessaflex TM in digital. So far, it
I, too, am strange in that regard. I originally justified the -DS
purchase because of my old P-30T Pentax and the two or three mediocre
lenses I had
This one time, at band camp, Wigwam Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It appears that there are TWO different lenses - the magazine article
did not specify. One is a 'cheap and cheerful' 3-element focus-free
lens designed to emulate the older consumer camera lens quality, the
other is a
On 6/6/05, Wigwam Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am a strange guy, I bought my *ist DS so I could mount my classic M42
lenses on it and use it like my Bessaflex TM in digital. So far, it
seems to be just what I was after. I also have other bad habits - I do
not have any Microsoft products,
Wigwam,
Welcome to the list!
PESO = picture every so often. Several people were doing the PAW thing
(picture a week) but I just couldn't produce anything that I'd show off
anywhere near that often s...
This one has some great elements but just doesn't complete the package for
me.
The
Excellent as always Paul.
How long have you been a Mopar guy?
CW
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 9:11 PM
Subject: PESO: This morning's shoot
I shot a car this morning for a magazine article. It's
From: cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/06/06 Mon PM 12:51:16 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax *ist DS at the Ball Game
Wigwam,
Welcome to the list!
PESO = picture every so often. Several people were doing the PAW thing
(picture a week) but I just couldn't
Had a nice chat with a Canon 1D owner @ a graduation party yesterday. We had a
good talk about lenses on the various
digital bodies. He also culled out kept film lenses that gave acceptable
digital results. He's become an avid Tamron user on digital, for half or less
the price of the Canon
Sunday, June 5, 2005, 7:51:09 PM, Jens wrote:
JB Hi Paul
JB I have no idea. I normally just delete the files when they are stored.
JB The cards work great. No problems. It's the files retrieved from the card -
JB in my portable harddrive, which I can't seem to open or read. Twice within
JB one
Thanks Shel. I love 'em too. I wish I had bought one twenty years ago :-)
Paul
Ahhh ... one of my favorite cars - a hemi in any basic 2-door sedan - a
Q-ship - photographed using one of my favorite lenses.
A nice way to read the evening mail ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From:
Sunday, June 5, 2005, 9:43:41 PM, Shel wrote:
SB The Zone VI mods add some baffling and additional flare resistance,
SB although, to be honest, I've not observed any flare with non modified
SB meters.
Me neither (the optics are very simple), but sometimes when metering
right next to a bright
This church was not full of gold colors. There was never a color shot
made. You're out of luck ...
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Markus Maurer
A good and interesting photo for me.
Assuming how full of rich (gold) colors the church is I would like to see
a
comparison in color to your
Thanks Cotty. Yes I have a couple hundred static. I shot 3.5 gigs of RAW. I'll
post some more in the days to come. The engine and interior are showroom new as
well. Probably worth a peak for those who like such things. For now, my home
computer is down. Why? That's a real long story that
With the 20D when you are in full manual mode the rear dial does aperture
and the front shutter. in Av the front does aperture and the rear dial does
exposure compensation. in Tv the front does shutter and the rear is
exposure compensation. At least that's how i have mine setup. It works
well,
Thanks. I'm not sure I'm a Mopar guy. My only fun car is a 55 Chevy. But I've
been involved with Mopars since 1971, first as a funny car crewchief, later as
a magazine journalist for a number of buff books, and finally as a writer for
the Dodge advertising agency. Perhaps that makes me a Mopar
Hi, thanks for the responses.
I would like the focal plane shutter version, exactly for reasons JCO
writes (use of cheap barrel lenses, I already have one apochromatic
barrelled longfocus lens which would be great for tight portraits, and
some super-fast LF lenses are cheap to get in barrel).
Nice shot, Wiggy. Looks like that ball is going to right field. Nice framing. I
like the way the catcher's mitt intrudes. And you just nailed the moment. Makes
it a fun photo.
I love that old Vivitar 200. I've owned one for 30 years. Mine has a lot of
cleaning marks that resulted from many
Hi Tom,
thanks a lot for your post. It sums the things I wanted to know
nicely.
And yes, I am most interested in using 9x12cm film, not the rollfilm
backs.
According to what I gathered now, I would be best served with a Speed
with the top rangefinder (because of the interchangeable cams).
It's a little ironic that you should post this pic when you did. Just the
day before I was reminiscing about what was essentially the Dodge version
of this car. My first serious girlfriend lived next door to a Dodge
dealer, and he brought home a 1964-65 (I believe) Dodge Coronet 2-door
sedan, the
From: Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/06/06 Mon PM 02:14:48 GMT
To: Graywolf pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: 'Graphics
Hi Tom,
thanks a lot for your post. It sums the things I wanted to know
nicely.
And yes, I am most interested in using 9x12cm film, not the rollfilm
If it was a '64 or '65, it would have been a not intended for highway use
race hemi. Those cars had the ram manifold and 12.5:1 compression. Although
they were rated at 425 horsepower to keep the government at bay and the
sanctioning bodies in the dark, they actually put out around 600
I like the early muscle cars like this one. I'm more of a Ford Mustang guy
though. I had a '65 289/4bbl (not HiPo) with Pony interior, factory air,
RallyPac and a vinyl roof. It also had the optional seatbelts no the
optional driver's side mirror. sadly, the frame starting behind the doors
all
http://isnoop.net/gmail/
Hi Christian,
Thanks for the comments and the Mustang update :-). Yes, the web pic is a bit
oversaturated. I processed it for printing and then just downsized the result
and plunked in in my photo net pabe. To get the pop I like from the Epson, I
have to oversaturate a bit on the screen.
- Original Message -
From: Collin Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 9:03 AM
Subject: Interesting conversation yesterday
Had a nice chat with a Canon 1D owner @ a graduation party yesterday.
Anyway, he like to shoot sports.
Hi Christian,
The colors are nicely saturated on my monitor, but far from garish or
overly saturated.
My friend Tom had a HiPo pony car and we used to run it at the drags in
Westhampton, LI. I'd crew for him, and we'd have a great time.
I think the 'stang may have been a prettier car than the
Look here:
http://www.sportsshooter.com/news/1336
article on lensbabies in use.
Frantisek
Yes, it did have the ram manifold.
Here's a little Mopar trivia for you. The little slant six of that era
could be hot rodded like crazy from the Chrysler parts bin with such parts
as cams, special pistons, and ram manifolds that would take either a 4bbl
or multiple single or 2-bbl crabs. Some
Nice shot, love the glove protruding into the frame. Perhaps in the future
you can make the pic smaller si it'll fit on a screen without the viewer
having to scroll up and down so much.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Wigwam Jones
http://www.cameramentor.com/jpg/baseball_001.jpg
mw What about the Mamiya press?
It doesn't take 9x12cm (5x4 for you UK Imperial measures guys g)...
But thanks :)
Frantisek
I wish I were, Peter ... but thanks for the kind words ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: P. J. Alling
Shel, you're a master printer. It shows in your photoshop work.
American Defense Spending g
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/02/05 6:53 PM
Alternatively, we could cherry-pick different bits from different
countries:
Italian economic policy
British social policy
Turkish human rights policy
French foreign policy
Swedish tax policy
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original
Hello Wigwam,
Having just shot over 8,000 little league action shots, I can relate.
Rather than spot metering, you can use Center Weighted and find
something of reasonable reflectance to kind of simulate an ambient
reading. Use the grass or something. Usually the lighting is not
going to change
My D is at Pentax Belgium for repair (hopefully warranty does exists).
The kind woman said she asked for a complete check-up as well (as the
memory card problem).
Have to live without D for a couple weeks now :(
--
Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX and
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Christian wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Collin Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 9:03 AM
Subject: Interesting conversation yesterday
Had a nice chat with a Canon 1D owner @ a graduation party yesterday.
does anybody here know the Vixen VX2 body?
I looked into it a few years ago, Markus, back when I was doing a bit of
astrophotography. I forget who it was made by (Cosina? Voigtlander?
Ricoh?), but I finally decided that it was unlikely to perform better than
the LX, so I never actually ended up
Yuri Korobkov wrote:
http://isnoop.net/gmail/
I am so not going to click that 8-)
It's the main hall of a big theater, sunday afternoon.
Thanks for your comments
Albano
--- Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very nice! Where was this taken, and what were the
circumstances? There is something of an air of
mystery about it.
One might crop out the left quarter and
100% found. I was in this hall viewing a photo
exhibition and saw the kids playing. So I kept there
waiting for them to be under the spot lights. Took
several pics, this one is my favorite
Regards,
Albano
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good work with the light, Albano ... nicely
Frantisek wrote:
mw What about the Mamiya press?
It doesn't take 9x12cm (5x4 for you UK Imperial measures guys g)...
But thanks :)
Frantisek
I'm sure I've seen somewhere that you can get ones with sheet film
backs. It's not here:
http://digilander.libero.it/clabo/mamiya/ although it's
There is a guy in Flordia (USA) who modifies the Mamiya Universal Press to take
the Polaroid 545 backs. It will presumably also take a 4x5 (9x12) film holder.
However it will not allow a full 4x5 image as the body opening is not big
enough for that. For a roll film camera I love the MUP, and
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 09:03:44AM -0400, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
Anyway, he like to shoot sports. Especially baseball.
What he likes to get is the ball coming off the bat,
and 5fps isn't fast enough for him. Hmmm.
I've said it before, and I'm sure I'll have to sy it again:
You can't
På 6. jun. 2005 kl. 18.40 skrev John Francis:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 09:03:44AM -0400, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
Anyway, he like to shoot sports. Especially baseball.
What he likes to get is the ball coming off the bat,
and 5fps isn't fast enough for him. Hmmm.
I've said it before, and
On 6/6/05, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
With the 20D when you are in full manual mode the rear dial does aperture
and the front shutter.
Same on the 1D but you can select the inverse as well.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On 6/6/05, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
This shot was with the LX (pretty sure the winder was on, but
there are no before or after shots on the negative strip so I know it was a
single press of the shutter button):
http://www.skofteland.net/displayimage.php?album=12pos=0
NICE shot
Calumet bought out Zone VI years ago. The modified Pentax Digital Spotmeter is
here: http://tinyurl.com/888ma
Once again Ebay buyers are proven crazy. The new one goes for $580 and they are
willing to pay $800 for a used one. Oh well.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof ==
I think you did well the way you did, otherwise it would have probably
got to bright. The base already looks a bit burned. I like the dirty
trousers, and the stuff in the background, that gives a real look.
Pancho
Wigwam Jones wrote:
(..)
I should have used spot-metering, in retrospect. Oh
On 6/6/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
Nice shot, love the glove protruding into the frame. Perhaps in the future
you can make the pic smaller si it'll fit on a screen without the viewer
having to scroll up and down so much.
Agreed. What I do is drag the pic onto my desktop and
Thank you very much for the kind words! In answer to your question, yes, I was
shooting from the stands. I will be trying to get onto the field in the
future, though.
In response to the comments about the image size, I will attempt to make the
images smaller in future. No telling what size
I'll certainly agree with you on the timing aspect. If this guy is
blindly holding down the shutter button, I'll bet his keeper rate is
low and he mostly misses the shot he is after. I can say that lots of
practice of the exact timing you are trying to achieve is very helpful
- one is to get
- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.skofteland.net/displayimage.php?album=12pos=02
Nice, but is that what he had in mind? I visualised Collin's initial
email with the ball much closer to the bat (possibly deformed, does
this ball deform
Anybody who likes 60's Dodges/Plymouths and Linux is cool with me ;)
On Monday 06 June 2005 10:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This message has been processed by Brightmail(r) AntiVirus using
Symantec's AntiVirus Technology.
Unknown.data was not scanned for viruses because too many
In days long gone when I shot a lot of drag racing, I frequently tried to time
shots. I soon learned that if I saw it in the viewfinder, I didn't get it. The
mirror, of course, has to be up at the opportune moment.
Another interesting aside: When airbags were a big deal in cars, every
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My friend Tom had a HiPo pony car and we used to run it at the drags in
Westhampton, LI.
Is that far from Illinois? :-)
Christian
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Another interesting aside: When airbags were a big deal in cars, every
manufacturer wanted to show them
opening. We shot them with a camera that did two thousand frames per
second. That's right, 2000/second.
The camera screamed for each
I sent this to a friend who was interested in what another friend had done
when remodeling her kitchen. Thought I'd post it here as well just for
grins ;-))
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/ceiling.html
Made with the little Sony DSC-S85
Shel
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: Interesting conversation yesterday
http://www.skofteland.net/displayimage.php?album=12pos=2
NICE shot Christian. You *sure* you didn't PS
Hi Shel. Was that New York National Drag Strip in Center Moriches where you
raced in the sixties? That track was just about ten miles from Westhampton.
Although I think I remember that there was once another track way out there on
the island. In fact, it was called Island Dragway if I remember
On 6/6/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
I sent this to a friend who was interested in what another friend had done
when remodeling her kitchen. Thought I'd post it here as well just for
grins ;-))
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/ceiling.html
Seen it!
Cheers,
Cotty
As colors don't relect the same amount of light, Pentax lists the
exposure compensation needed for each color. I translated the names
into real color patch (with pencils) with the needed compensation and
taped it on the meter.
Andre
A classic baseball shot. Love it. Impeccable timing of course.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: Interesting conversation yesterday
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 06:48:34PM +0200, DagT wrote:
A good and prepared photographer can react in 1/10 second.
If you're prepared, and the action is predictable, you can
do a great deal better than that.
As most here know, I spend quite some time photographing
cars travelling at a high
--- John Dallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Higher resolution is fine, but I'm baffled by the
need for a faster
buffer. I spot the potential picture, get ready, and
take it. If it's a
moving or changing subject I wait for the right
moment, near as I can
guess, and press the button.
I
Interesting shot. Nice kitchen. I suppose that you want to communicate a sense
of place for the friend who is interested in seeing the other friend's kitchen
so the loose frame is best here, but you might consider cropping some off the
top and right for photo fun. By the way, can those pans be
Hello John,
So an interesting follow on question is:
Obviously practice is critical to your timing. Do you find, given
practice, that some bodies do much better for you than others? If so,
which ones? Seems that there are two different issues at play - one
is shutter lag and the other is how
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 1:34 PM
Subject: Re: Interesting conversation yesterday
A classic baseball shot. Love it. Impeccable timing of course.
Paul
Thanks, Paul. Good seats helped too!
Christian
Hi Paul,
You're right on both counts wrt the crop. Yes, the pans can be reached
without a stool. I was prone on the floor when shooting this one.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interesting shot. Nice kitchen. I suppose that you want to communicate a
sense of place for
I haven't done serious experimentation, but if I knew I was
going to be trying stuff like this I would take the camera
bodies with the fastest fps, because they usually have
the shortest shutter lag. It's a great deal easier with
digital, because you can see when you got it right, but
even with
Thanks Fred
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 5:56 PM
To: Markus Maurer
Subject: Re: Vixen VX2 k-mount body for astro photography
does anybody here know the Vixen VX2 body?
I looked into it a few years ago, Markus,
You shouldn't be reacting to a baseball pitch (or a bowler bowling in
cricket). You know where the ball is, and can predict where and when the bat
and ball will make contact (if at all). Anybody with decent hand/eye
coordination should be able to get the shot.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original
Hi Albano
It was worth the wait, I like it ;-)
Would be interesting to see if denoising the grain in the darker parts would
help or destroy to much details.
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Albano Garcia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 6:03 PM
To:
John,
I've found that the soft releases can provide a greater amount of control.
I use 'em on just about all my camera bodies. The best ones seem to be
those made by Tom Abrahamsson for the Leicas, which fit a number of Pentax
and other camera bodies as well.
Shel
[Original Message]
From:
In predictable situations, and as you say most situations are more or
less predictable (I should have written (less than 1/10s), I don´t
mind having a short shutterlag. Most slr´s are acceptable once the AF
is turned off. You always have to learn how a camera responds, and
doing this you
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thibouille) wrote:
Doesn't work.
It reads and formats without problem under WinXP.
Then put it into the camera. Tells me it is not formated and refuse to
format it itself.
I think it's this problem with XP:
As far as I understand it, trap focus assumes that the action is going to go
over a predictable position. I don't think that's very likely in top-flight
football (sorry, I just can't call it 'soccer' g).
The only thing that's predictable about football is that England will never
again win a
The way you set the shot suggests you're not after the portrait but
after
an
atmosphere/mood/feeling.
There was never any intention of making a portrait, certainly
not in a traditional sense.
There are very little visual clues to indicate what mood.
It's a kind
of ambiguous. Rather,
Yes, As I just wrote to John Francis I should have written less than
1/10s when the situation is predictable.
Learning how you camera responds is important, and having a
sufficiently short shutterlag. I´m usually not interested i when the
next exposure comes, as it is too late anyway.
DagT
I'll use those for inspiration - I'm shooting a 9-year-old girls' tournament
in a few weeks. Should be fun!
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 June 2005 08:34
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: Working on an opportunity
No idea if it
Vixen VX2 is made by Cosina of Japan, which also makes the current
Voigtlander-branded family of rangefinders and SLRs in Leica Screw Mount and
M42 (Pentax Screw Mount) respectively. They also make and sell a 'Voigtlander'
branded P/K mount SLR which greatly resembles the Vixen VX-2 - to the
Oh, and I forgot - Cosina is Phoenix brand too. All same-same. Here's an
interesting link:
http://www.popphoto.com/article.asp?print_page=ysection_id=2article_id=774page_number=1preview=
You can kinda tell I'm a nut for this Cosina stuff. Sorry.
Best,
Wiggy
---Original Message---
Hi Paul,
I like this one.
Replace the baseball cap with a hat and there you are: a nice the commercial
ad for a car from that era. At least I think that's how commercial ads
looked in the sixties/seventies.
Cheers,
Leon
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL
Anybody else who can't wait to hear the stories about this year's GFM?
Photos too, of course...
I didn't get to go. It seems we've sold our house and have a bunch of things
to take care of before we move (not to mention we are suddenly saving like
mad). But, having gone last year, I really
Greetings:
Has anyone seen this particular Ref Converter?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=29968item=752044
9926rd=1ssPageName=WDVW#ebayphotohosting)
If so, do you know if it will fit on an ME/MX or an *ist DS? All we have
to go on is the eBay listing is the fact that it
This is the one I have:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/4773833/
It does fit the K1000, but not Super A. The good thing about this model is,
that it may be possible to adjust or change the connection (use an old eye
piece for your camera model) to fit your camera model.
Jens Bladt
- Original Message -
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The most important thing, for me, is a camera with a very
positive shutter release. Unfortunately this is one area
where I feel Pentax lag behind others; both the Nikon D100
and the Canon 20D have a far crisper release than
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Bob W wrote:
The only thing that's predictable about football is that England will never
again win a major championship. And nobody wants to focus on that.
Whereas you clearly saw Greece coming last year :-)
Even what you say above is not predictable. Which is why we watch
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Christian wrote:
nope not a big deal, but it may screw up the URL for the original shot of
the hit. :-(
http://www.skofteland.net/displayimage.php?album=12pos=0
Nice, I like that. Thanks Christian.
K
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
