Every 180 degrees of rotation it will be lined
up with the drive coupler in the camera. If it isn't close enough to
lining up (and statistically, it often won't be) then it, well,
won't line up and couple.
It would normally spin (camera side) until it lined up and then engage
wouldn't it?
Rock-steady Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
f/4 is slow for a 70mm lens, but f/4-f/5.6 isn't that slow for a 200mm
lens. The problem with long lenses is getting *enough* DoF, particularly
when close ... Most of the time I find myself shooting at f/11-f/22 with
anything longer than 135mm.
Fine if
WOW what a shot !
Tell me something.. the leaves a the back are natural (they turned out
like that when you've shot it) or they are reworked with PS ?
The photo is beautifull (again) !!!
On 6/28/05, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Check out -
At 12:36 AM -0700 6/29/05, Powell Hargrave wrote:
If he gets it.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=7526667604
How do you say escrow in Mandarin?!
--
Alan P. Hayes
Meaning and Form: Writing, Editing and Document Design
Pittsfield, Massachusetts
Photographs at
Powell Hargrave wrote:
If he gets it.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=7526667604
The listing states the following:
The seller ended this listing early to sell to the high bidder(s) at
current bid price.
My suspicion is that the high bidder and seller actually
Ditto (clap clap clap).
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 7:13 AM
Subject: Let's Give Rob Studdert a Big Round of Applause
I'll have to second that. Rob's really a super guy, and very
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Powell Hargrave wrote:
If he gets it.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=7526667604
What does Thank you for your support mean?
Kostas :-)
Hi!
I second opinion of Joseph. Then I suppose I third ;-) opinon of Shel.
I've learned many things from Rob. He is ever present ever helpful...
--
Boris
Easy now, Mike. You're just sleep deprived from all that bat chasing. :-)
When posting PESOs I reuse old HTML files, and sometimes I forget to exchange
all the code. Sorry about that.
Jostein
Quoting mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If you look at the title of the page, it is Birdie. At least,
I like the way this man thinks.
g
Dave
On 6/29/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29/6/05, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
I think you'll find that it's a criminal offence. I'll be damned if I'm
going
to put myself in any even if remote legal predicament to help someone save
Rob Studdert (wrote this about tax avoidance):
I think you'll find that it's a criminal offence. I'll be damned if I'm
going to put myself in any even if remote legal predicament to help someone save a
few bucks on customs at their end.
Then Cotty replied:
Me me me me me me me!!
Sometimes
Powell Hargrave wrote:
If he gets it.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=7526667604
It's gotta be a fraud. My guess is that the seller ended it early
before someone figured it out and eBay could yank the auction.
Tom Reese
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/06/29 Wed AM 09:41:27 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Paw: The scent of early summer
Easy now, Mike. You're just sleep deprived from all that bat chasing. :-)
Last one tonight. I think. At least, out of the present contracts. A
I like this one. The near symmetry is both pleasing and humorous. The
bokeh looks good.
Paul
Hi Gang
I fear my run of 5 pictures with positive feedback is about to
change,but,
i'll submit
Deer_1 for
your dining and dancing pleasure.
http://photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/?
Thibouille asked:
Is (the SMC F 70-210) the lens which is supposed to be so good (for a
consumer level zoom)?
Just don't want to acquire a dog...
Is this why you asked?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=7525535023ssPageName=ADME:X:ON:US:2
Tom Reese
http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00ChMfunified_p=1
Sincerely,
Collin
Sent via the WebMail system at mail.safe-t.net
If you look at the sellers profile, you'd see that all feedback comments are
like:
???**,,,??. To be fair, it could just be that eBay pages don't
support oriental characters when they are being referred into occidental
eBay sites, but it does arouse my suspicion. It was also this ID's
Quoting Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 27/6/05, Jostein, discombobulated, unleashed:
Could be amended, mate. :-)
That a hint?
You know you want it to be. :-)
Resistance is useless.
Jostein
This message was sent using IMP,
IMO a very small number of people, perhaps even only one, are
setting up some ID's to sting gullible round eyes. If this one
ended early it's because the price wasn't getting high enough to be
worth retiring that ID.
I think it's a small group, there's been another lister from China
Finally got around to looking.
When you said you missed the moment by a few seconds, I assume you there were
more spectacular lighting in the clouds previously. From looking at the
midtones in your picture, I would guess that there's a lot of drama to bring
out in this picture if you play around
Powell Hargrave wrote:
If he gets it.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=7526667604
I just jumped into this thread, but...based solely on the eBay ad, I
wouldn't touch it!
He's selling a *istD, including a Pentax SMCPDA 16-45mm zoom f4.0 ED/AL
lens, for less than US$
He's selling a *istD, including a Pentax SMCPDA 16-45mm zoom f4.0
ED/AL lens, for less than US$ 200, and even ended the bid early to
take the cash?
I have doubts the winner will ever get his camera.
I'll be really p*ssed if it's genuine 8-)
John
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00ChMfunified_p=1
Hey, that's our Wiggy! Wiggy, have you a picture of the modified lens?
It appears to be focusing quite close; how close?
Kostas
not that one ;)
2005/6/29, Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thibouille asked:
Is (the SMC F 70-210) the lens which is supposed to be so good (for a
consumer level zoom)?
Just don't want to acquire a dog...
Is this why you asked?
Juey Chong Ong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
It reminds me of photos in the book:
By Nature's Design
Text by Pat Murphy, Photographs by William Neill, Foreword by Diane
Ackerman
Chronicle Books, 1993
Wow, that's high praise! (I already have that book.)
There are some fern photographs in
I was refering to the 70-210. At the 200mm is makes about 300mm
equivallent (325,5mm to be exact).
2005/6/28, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Jun 28, 2005, at 1:40 PM, Thibouille wrote:
which is 300 equivallent on an ist-D ;)
A 135mm lens on the D/DS bodies provides a field of
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Thibouille
which is 300 equivallent on an ist-D ;)
AAAGHHH.
Come on Bill, he didn't say it *is* a 300 in the D, he said
equivalent, which it is in terms of FOV.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Hi Mark,
While out taking shots for the Nature Guides job a few days ago
Nice shot. Background might be a little busy for my taste. You know me, I
like that smooth velvety look ; )
Nice composition and the spores make a difference, but I think the
background is too similar chromatically to
I'll fourth that. I will never forget when I got my LX and I posted my first
question
here, Rob was ever so helpful.
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 10:13 PM
Subject: Let's Give Rob Studdert a Big
Thanks Ken
It could be. I'm thinking i might have missed the sharpening stage. It did look
sharper
before i resized.
I'v shown full frame on all 6 so far. I'll print this one out and see what it
looks like.
Dave
Dave, nice capture, obviously the positioning
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Mark Roberts wrote:
While out taking shots for the Nature Guides job a few days ago, I
needed to get some photos of fern spores. A couple of the shots ended up
looking so nice that they stand on their own from an artistic
standpoint. At least I think so. Other
On 6/28/05, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is straightness a bourgeois concept too?
It may be.
I tend to think of it more in terms of existential absurdity, however...
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 6/28/05, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Disconnected ~= disoriented ~= tilted ;-).
Frank, there is one thing that seems odd/wrong with this photo. It is
its left part. It reminds me of those optical illusions where human eye
seems to misinterpret information given by the eye.
Thanks Cotty, Paul, Kieth Kenneth for your suggestions comments.
I haven't tried any matte paper yet. When I set up the printer I
installed the photo black ink, and when you print from Photoshop it
doesn't give you the option to select matte paper if the matte black
ink isn't installed.
Got the CD that Cesar made of the many hundred snaps I took at GFM
with his *istD. (thanks, Cesar!!)
Wading through it last night, a few fun ones at PDML central jumped
out at me. Just snaps of folks having a good time. I'll load some
more later, but here's a few to get you started:
On 29 Jun 2005 at 7:30, Cotty wrote:
Me me me me me me me!!
Sometimes it's nothing to do with customs and excise, sometimes it's
everything to do with local customs, like pilfering!
It's the luck of the draw unless you insure.
Never use brand names or anything but generic item descriptions
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 20:43:07 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Gang
I fear my run of 5 pictures with positive feedback is about to change,but,
i'll submit
Deer_1 for
your dining and dancing pleasure.
On 28 Jun 2005 at 22:13, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I'll have to second that. Rob's really a super guy, and very helpful, even to
us cranky old farts ;-))
Gee, thanks guys, I'm constantly amazed at the degree of camaraderie and
generosity exhibited by the members of this list. Though I may be a
Thank you Mark, You are a prim(e)rose :-)
Have thanked you off list, but want to express my gratitude public too.
I am impressed. Impressed by two things. First the thing that you have made
time to test out this combination, for me a new member of the list. A
troublesome member too ;-)
I'm also
On Jun 28, 2005, at 9:53 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
I too have held a Canon 70-200L f4. I was not overly impressed.
It may be a better optic, it may not be, but does it matter? After
all the limiting factor these days is the resolving power of the
sensor in your camera. The SMC-P F 70-210
On 6/28/05, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While out taking shots for the Nature Guides job a few days ago, I
needed to get some photos of fern spores. A couple of the shots ended up
looking so nice that they stand on their own from an artistic
standpoint. At least I think so. Other
Quoting frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is that why Jostein's always travelling? In search of cheaper beer?
Alas...:-(
Jostein
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
On 6/28/05, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to keep you going.
http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bilder/vis_bilde.cgi?id=182348
Click on the picture to make it full screen.
DagT
That's about a perfect photo, near as I can see. Okay, there's no
place for the concept of perfection in
Quoting Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think this would be best served by means of medium format :). I know
at least one Norwegian that has a backpack full of 645 gear :).
Well apparently he's about to fill up that backpack with beer-bottles from UK or
Denmark, if Knarf and Cotty is to
I'd love to se it compared to the F 70-210mm. Can anyone do that? :-)
I have only had problems with my 70-210 when using (too slow) film for
sports events and similar.
On the *ist D I can always increase the ISO-setting.
Regards
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
Don't panic, it's just my warped sense of humour.
Don't worry; there is no panic here, not at all. I do appreciate your warped
sense of humour, Cotty, don't worry. The whole Rubbish issue has been a
joke for me, as for you, from the start.
But I will probably try to reshoot at the spot later.
G'day Michael,
Their both excellent. Where is my beer? is a fun shot of a happy
kid, but All about stars.. is my favorite. The pose and the look in
his eyes really make it.
Very nice.
Dave
On 6/28/05, Michael Spivak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since i don't have much time to go out, and have
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Rob Studdert wrote:
declarations. That said I did receive from the Czech Republic US$133 cash in an
envelope where the sender had very honestly listed cash 133,00 USD as the
contents on the very obvious customs declaration.
I thought about framing it. :-)
I don't get it.
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Rob Studdert wrote:
declarations. That said I did receive from the Czech Republic US$133 cash in an
envelope where the sender had very honestly listed cash 133,00 USD as the
contents on the very obvious customs declaration.
I thought about framing it. :-)
I don't get it.
Don't believe nobody has commented on this, it deserves better.
I fine moment off boy joy. Sadly it is a bit let down by the fact that the
guys are a bit too dark IMHO. But a step or two up would have burned out the
sky. And it is the sky that makes the guys powerful. A polarizer might have
done
On 28 Jun 2005 at 22:13, Shel
Belinkoff wrote:
I'll have to second that. Rob's really a super guy, and very helpful, even
to
us cranky old farts ;-))
Yes i will agree on that aswell.:-)
Gee, thanks guys, I'm constantly amazed at the degree of
Got to admit he is a good man.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I'll have to second that. Rob's really a super guy, and very helpful, even
to us cranky old farts ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Joseph Tainter
I must have done something right in a former life to have run into Rob
Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you Mark, You are a prim(e)rose :-)
Have thanked you off list, but want to express my gratitude public too.
I am impressed. Impressed by two things. First the thing that you have made
time to test out this combination, for me a new member of the list. A
Just as I suspected, you're in it for the money LOL
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Rob Studdert
Gee, thanks guys, I'm constantly amazed at the degree of camaraderie and
generosity exhibited by the members of this list. Though I may be a bit
of an
old fart myself at times I've had very
It seems that there's far more that can be done with transform than could
ever be done with the crop tool, David. I'm just now learning about its
potential since Sonny mentioned it (spent all of about 30 minutes with it),
so I'm far from a maven. Are you familiar with all that transform can do?
I might bet against you. The 30mm isn't listed there yet but if you
look at the sigma
site for lens compatibility and availability you'll find that most of
their lenses are
available in Pentax AF. The only system that seems to be really
discriminated against
is 4/3 (Olydak)
Herb Chong
On 29 Jun 2005 at 7:53, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
It seems that there's far more that can be done with transform than could
ever be done with the crop tool, David. I'm just now learning about its
potential since Sonny mentioned it (spent all of about 30 minutes with it), so
I'm far from a maven.
On 29 Jun 2005 at 10:55, Mark Roberts wrote:
Hey, it wasn't entirely altruistic; I was interested in seeing what this
combination could do myself! Even though I own both items (the Vivitar
S1 70-210 and the Pentax 1.7x AF TC) I'd never thought how useful they
could be together. I found the
I don't get it. I have repeatedly sent cash by post:
In some countries it is illegal (stupid but...) or at least not
permitted which means you can do it if you want but don't come criying
later if nobody receives it (which is the cas in Belgium).
--
--
Thibouille
It depends but... It was the catch phrase from the Bartles and Jaymes
brand of wine cooler advertisements in the US a few years ago.
http://www.bartlesandjaymes.com/home.htm In case you care.
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Powell Hargrave wrote:
If he gets it.
On Jun 29, 2005, at 6:56 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
I'd love to se it compared to the F 70-210mm. Can anyone do that? :-)
I have only had problems with my 70-210 when using (too slow) film for
sports events and similar.
On the *ist D I can always increase the ISO-setting.
I can't do a direct
I know it is a little flash without zoom head and so on.
But what does it offer? Little but with quality or totaly bad unit?
I'd never buy it alone but I could get it in Kit so...
--
Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX and KR-10x ...
Holly crap, it's less than I paid for my F 70-210 and FA 28-70 combined
and you get a free camera.
Tom Reese wrote:
Thibouille asked:
Is (the SMC F 70-210) the lens which is supposed to be so good (for
a consumer level zoom)?
Just don't want to acquire a dog...
Is this why you asked?
Thanks, Tim - you're right of cource.
I have some compensated pics as well, but I like this one.
Actually, I did have a polarizer in my bag, but it all happened so fast :-).
Other photographers saw this oportunity as well (even though I was the first
one at that scene).
A similar picture was
Now that's amazing, but so is the K mount view camera on the same page.
Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00ChMfunified_p=1
Sincerely,
Collin
Sent via the WebMail system at
On 29 Jun 2005 at 14:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob just one question with your profiles you made for us.
I have PSEL 3 with the Raw converter. I think its the same as the one for CS2,
so they should work for EL3, yes.??
I'm really not sure, the files are XML (text based) so it's not likely
Shipping a lens to Siberia, no thats cool. :)
Chad
Paul said:
I shipped my Tamron 200-500/6.3 to Siberia. US Air Mail shipping was
$40. It arrived in good condition three weeks later.
Nice photo, Jens!
Tim is correct in that the foreground is underexposed. IMO, a
polarizer wouldn't help at all. It would make the sky too unnatural
looking. The +1 EV version is better but loses the saturation in the
sky, flattens the colors on the dancers too.
However, a few moments
- Original Message -
From: Thibouille
Subject: Re: consumer speed ??
I was refering to the 70-210. At the 200mm is makes about 300mm
equivallent (325,5mm to be exact).
William Robb
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
However, a few moments with Photoshop ... a Curves Adjustment Layer and
mask does the trick for me.
Fill-in flash would have been another option, I guess...
S
Frank, you are a truly evil man.
frank theriault wrote:
On 6/28/05, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to keep you going.
http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bilder/vis_bilde.cgi?id=182348
Click on the picture to make it full screen.
DagT
That's about a perfect photo, near as I can see.
On Jun 29, 2005, at 8:30 AM, William Robb wrote:
I was refering to the 70-210. At the 200mm is makes about 300mm
equivallent (325,5mm to be exact).
It is somewhat difficult to figure out what people are referring to
sometimes. But what are you AAAHHing
On 6/28/05, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to keep you going.
http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bilder/vis_bilde.cgi?id=182348
Excellent work!
Godfrey
On Jun 29, 2005, at 8:38 AM, Steve Jolly wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
However, a few moments with Photoshop ... a Curves Adjustment
Layer and mask does the trick for me.
Fill-in flash would have been another option, I guess...
Possibly. The problem with fill flash is that, if done
You were right, it wasn't better tomorrow.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Thibouille Subject: Re: consumer
speed ??
I was refering to the 70-210. At the 200mm is makes about 300mm
equivallent (325,5mm to be exact).
William Robb
--
Thanks Cory,
Just what I wanted to hear (except the part about the first one dying, I
understand the case is plastic welded or glued?).
The one I had just had screws (so of course I took it apart to see
if I could see what was wrong). It didn't die right away, but one of the
slots didn't
On 29/6/05, Collin Brendemuehl, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00ChMfunified_p=1
Nice one, thanks Collin.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
In a backlit daylight shot, fill flash won't leave a shadow. It's really the
best option for a shot like this, but is somewhat of a pain to execute.
Paul
On Jun 29, 2005, at 8:38 AM, Steve Jolly wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
However, a few moments with Photoshop ... a Curves
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 11:42 AM
Subject: Re: consumer speed ??
On Jun 29, 2005, at 8:30 AM, William Robb wrote:
I was refering to the 70-210. At the 200mm is makes about 300mm
Fill flash is obviously the best option for a shot like this, but you can also
do a lot with the Shadow/Highlight tool in PSCS. Crank up about ten percent
shadow compensation then turn up the midtone contrast. It will give you a
substantial imrpovement.
Thanks, Tim - you're right of cource.
On 29/6/05, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's the luck of the draw unless you insure.
Never use brand names or anything but generic item descriptions on customs
declarations. That said I did receive from the Czech Republic US$133 cash
in an
envelope where the sender had very
Brother William is eternally dismayed at how most folks discuss crop
factor in terms of focal length. When Thibouille states 200mm is makes
about 300mm equivallent, William wants to reach through his computer and
throttle Thibouille's neck...
Thibouille, we all know that what you really meant to
On 29/6/05, Tim Sherburne, discombobulated, unleashed:
a 200mm
lens is still a 200mm lens regardless of the size of the sensitized material
you stick it in front of.
Hey Tim, what sensitized material are you sticking in front of your lenses??!
Can I watch ? :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
Fly paper? It gets rid of the specks which often end up being caught on
the sensor.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Cotty
a 200mm lens is still a 200mm lens regardless
of the size of the sensitized material you stick it in front of.
Hey Tim, what sensitized material are you sticking in
On 29/6/05, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
Don't worry; there is no panic here, not at all. I do appreciate your warped
sense of humour, Cotty, don't worry. The whole Rubbish issue has been a
joke for me, as for you, from the start.
But I will probably try to reshoot at the spot later.
On 29/6/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Wading through it last night, a few fun ones at PDML central jumped
out at me. Just snaps of folks having a good time. I'll load some
more later, but here's a few to get you started:
On 29/6/05, Powell Hargrave, discombobulated, unleashed:
If he gets it.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemrd=1item=7526667604
China
Not a scam, no way...
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Very funny. Listen to what I mean, not what I say...
:]
Tim
On 6/29/05 9:06, Cotty wrote:
On 29/6/05, Tim Sherburne, discombobulated, unleashed:
a 200mm
lens is still a 200mm lens regardless of the size of the sensitized material
you stick it in front of.
Hey Tim, what sensitized
On 29/6/05, keithw, discombobulated, unleashed:
He's selling a *istD, including a Pentax SMCPDA 16-45mm zoom f4.0 ED/AL
lens, for less than US$ 200, and even ended the bid early to take the cash?
he probably built it then swiped it, now eBaying if. Don't forget, that's
a lot of money in China!
Ebay scams 101
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 10:49, Anthony Farr wrote:
If you look at the sellers profile, you'd see that all feedback comments are
like:
???**,,,??. To be fair, it could just be that eBay pages don't
support oriental characters when they are being referred into occidental
On 28/6/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
[Original Message]
From: Joseph Tainter
I must have done something right in a former life to have run into Rob
Studdert on this list. What a gentleman.
I dunno, he's a bit anal.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
I certainly hope that your are right; the new Sigma 10-20/4,0-5,6 EX
DC HSM is not listed for Pentax either, but I hope it will be
eventually.
29 jun 2005 kl. 17.34 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I might bet against you. The 30mm isn't listed there yet but if you
look at the sigma
site for lens
Just to bring this thread back on topic, I'd like to point out that
Chad's FA*28-70/2.8 is no longer available because it just arrived on my
doorstep :)
Yes, it's MINE, ALL MINE!!
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Tim Sherburne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thibouille, we all know that what you really meant to say was that a 200mm
lens is still a 200mm lens regardless of the size of the sensitized material
you stick it in front of.
I expect Thibouille knows this and that's why he used the word
equivalent
On 29/6/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
Fly paper? It gets rid of the specks which often end up being caught on
the sensor.
LOL
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it's MINE, ALL MINE!!
Sorry. Forgot to add:
Bwahahahahahaha!
There. I feel better now.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Brilliant, thanks Knarf. More please!
We, m a lumberjack and aaam okayyy,
A sleep all night and aaa work all dayy
So much for me applying for undercover school now.LOL
Dave(who had better plaid the WW)Brooks
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 14:55, Mark Roberts wrote:
Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you Mark, You are a prim(e)rose :-)
Have thanked you off list, but want to express my gratitude public too.
I am impressed. Impressed by two things. First the thing that you have made
time to test
Cotty wrote:
On 29/6/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Wading through it last night, a few fun ones at PDML central jumped
out at me. Just snaps of folks having a good time. I'll load some
more later, but here's a few to get you started:
On Jun 29, 2005, at 8:57 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a backlit daylight shot, fill flash won't leave a shadow. It's
really the best option for a shot like this, but is somewhat of a
pain to execute.
Um, I disagree about the shadow, but I suppose it depends on just how
much flash
1 - 100 of 245 matches
Mail list logo
