No , Boris - now I'm over reacting. Buzz off!
I'm sick and tired of people telling me that I should be using new
technology. That I can learn to love it. That I should embrace it. That
I'll get used to it. That it will help my photography. I don't want to
learn to love it. The technology
On 15 Jul 2005 at 23:15, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
And now I'm gonna watch a 1940's movie on my 20+ year old non-cable ready
TV set, and enjoy some non-microwave pocorn.
And a Valium chaser perhaps :-)
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jul 16, 2005, at 12:10 AM, Cotty wrote:
But does it?
No it doesn't. The estimate is that AS allows you in practice to go
down up to shutter speeds 2 stops slower, while IS/VR systems allow up
to 3 stops.
--
Best regards
Sylwek
On Jul 16, 2005, at 12:42 AM, Cotty wrote:
It also means that if it fails...
Then you'd better have backup body with you ;-)
--
Best regards
Sylwek
As far as burgers themselves are concerned, probably not, but I've only had
2 or 3 McDonalds' burgers in my life. It's not an experience I subject
myself to willingly.
We have a chain called Wimpy which preceded McD by many years, and they were
pretty gruesome (still are, to judge from the
On Jul 16, 2005, at 1:12 AM, Herb Chong wrote:
that's only if they collaborate on the same body. there is every
indication that Panasonic will go its own way or work with Leica,
assuming that there is still a Leica camera division in a couple of
months.
So far both Olympus and Panasonic
On Jul 16, 2005, at 1:17 AM, Herb Chong wrote:
only if they abandon film altogether. can't do body IS without moving
lots of mass.
And in-body stabilisation could be just impossible to implement in FF
DSLR, so it seems that Canon won't go that way.
--
Best regards
Sylwek
On Jul 16, 2005, at 4:26 AM, Herb Chong wrote:
the sensor on the 7D moves about 1cm at maximum. that is a lot of
movement. i doubt it will work on the DA lenses unless their image
circle is much larger than the nominal.
So far users of Sigma's DC lenses didn't report any problems... And KM
Warning for all visitors to London: never, ever buy anything from those
'roach coaches' (great phrase). They're all over the place. The foul smell
of their frying can really spoil the experience of some great places. They
are unlicensed, and illegal. There have been several documentaries shown
On Jul 16, 2005, at 3:49 AM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
1. How good is it? One is using the edge of the lens.
It is quite good with shutter speeds up to 2 stops slower than usually.
2. Will it work with DA lenses with their narrower image circle?
It seems so. Some users of D7D use Sigma DC lenses
Here's the recipe from Apicius:
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Pantheon/9013/recipies.html#3
I have a book of ancient Roman recipes, adapted for the modern kitchen.
There are some very interesting dishes. You can also use Thai fish sauce
instead of liquamen. In fact, Thai fish sauce is more or
I was in my local camera shop recently, and they said they were now
handling 50% more film dp as they were five years ago.
Sounded impressive, until I remembered that five years ago we had four
camera shops within a mile or so. Now we have one.
Statistics always need interpretation.
John
Hi!
No , Boris - now I'm over reacting. Buzz off!
I'm sick and tired of people telling me that I should be using new
technology. That I can learn to love it. That I should embrace it. That
I'll get used to it. That it will help my photography. I don't want to
learn to love it. The
What???
No hand-made wire basket over an open hearth??
Microwave?
You, you, Techno-Freak!! ;-)
D
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 1:15 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: I'm Getting an Auto Focus Camera
And
LOL
Tell us what you really think Shel.
Dave
P.S.
I got to admire the kinda' person who'll go to the effort to type out
a long and nicely worded rant :-) BTW I agree completely, non
microwave popcorn is the best g
On 7/16/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No , Boris - now I'm over
På 16. jul. 2005 kl. 01.40 skrev keithw:
DagT wrote:
I agree with you Tim.
I have friends from Kosovo. Down there they are still arguing about
wrongs that were done 600 years ago. In that time they have had
people, a few, but enough, trying to wipe the others out again and
again, but the
Hi Shel;
My main concern is in film developing.
I'd like to establish conditions that allow me not
have to be concerned with temerature for now.
That way I can start changing one variable at a time,
time, agitation, concentration, brand, etc.
I have control over everything except temperature,
All food chains, McDonald's, Burger King, Pizza Hut, Domino's,
Starbucks, Dome (I don't even know if they are outside of West OZ)
etc. make terrible food. If they were interested in producing quality
food, instead of money, they wouldn't be a chain.
Within 10 minuets of my place I can think of 3
Hi!
I admit that this shot is a bit cliche, but it is beautiful scenery,
nonetheless. Taken on my recent Southern Utah trip.
Pentax *istD, A 28-135/4, handheld
ISO 800, 1/90 sec @ f/6.7
Converted from Raw using Capture One LE
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/monumentvalley_0464.htm
Bruce, a
Hi!
Exactly which planet do you come from again Bill?
I'm not telling.
Arrakis would be my quess... Bill, are you wearing contact lenses so as
to hide the real color of your eyes???
Boris
Hi!
Another Iconic, Cliched picture from Monument Valley - believe it or
not, I do have some Monument Valley shots that may be unfamiliar to
you. Anyway, this was taken a bit earlier than the Mittens At Dusk
shot. The sun hasn't quite set yet and the long shadows are creeping
over the valley.
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, mike wilson wrote:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
That begs the question: can you initiate mid-roll rewind? I imagine
that
in any rewind scenario, the film will be completely wound into the
cannister - correct?
Z1-p. Midroll rewind from a button
Hi!
I've simply stuck them in the same folder with the two of Tofu that I
showed previously.
NOTE: Do not open if you find any of the following offensive:
displays of public nudity, obscene gestures, alcohol consumption in
public. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.
If, on the other hand those things
Thank you, David ... Unfortunately, Boris (who is generally a kind a gentle
soul) will probably take it personally, and not realize that it's really
got nothing to do with him directly. My meds will kick in soon enough and
I'll fade off into the night, dreaming in grainy BW.
Shel
[Original
Thanks everyone for the suggestions, they ranged from
high-tech to no-tech! ;-)
I just had a friend in the HVAC business suggest a
solution the same as Bills, with a couple of twists.
A 50-100 foot coil of small diameter copper tube in
a fridge, *immersed in a large container of water*.
The water
I am very sorry about one thing. By mistake I sent my mail on list. That was
not my intention, not at all! As I said I don't want a debate.
I just wanted to let Keith know how I felt about his arguments. I want to
underline one word in the last sentence; felt. I don't claim my feelings as
an
Sorry, didn't notice the non in there!
I take back all my comments.
But, then again, television?
Pretty high tech stuff inside there. ;-)
D
-Original Message-
From: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 4:27 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE:
It's an old, kerosene powered TV converted to run on used cooking oil.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Don Sanderson
Sorry, didn't notice the non in there!
I take back all my comments.
But, then again, television?
Pretty high tech stuff inside there. ;-)
How do you think that film will be around if everyine is shooting
digital, and no one is shooting film? In ten years, the only place you
will see film in public is behind glass at the Smithsonian and george
Eastman House.
William Robb
My thought is that the cameras will be more plentiful
Hi!
Our guide told us that this basic scene was used in many of the old
westerns for the cowboy/outlaw riding off into the desert. They would
put the guy on a horse and have him head towards the distant rock
formations. I'm guessing John Wayne must have done this more than
once.
Pentax
Hi!
I just had do try my newest enablement, a used Tamron SP 17mm, with the
Pentax SFXn when I saw this big wheel and the teenagers in the foreground. I
made some other shoots too and will use this lens next week in the mountains
on Mt. Rigi
or Stanserhorn.
Yes i forgot to mention this to the list.
I mixed the months, so the upgrade takes place this weekend.
Cheers
Adelheid
: -Original Message-
: From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Sent: Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2005 23:13
: To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
: Subject: Re: PUG?
:
:
:
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Note to self:
Gotta go to Negev. Gotta visit Mitzpe Ramon...
Damn, you're good :-).
Aha! Desert enablement! :-) :-) :-)
Enjoy yourself, man!
Jostein
Hi!
There is a big portion of Monument Valley that you cannot go into
without a guide and good 4 wheel drive for the sand. For this trip, I
was able to arrange a private tour for our group in an air-conditioned
4-wheel drive van. We were able to start the tour in the early
afternoon and end
Hi!
http://tinyurl.com/c8422
Received this in my CodeProject newsletter...
Hope you'd have a chuckle...
Boris
Shel wrote:
I'm sick and tired of people telling me that I should be using new
technology. That I can learn to love it. That I should embrace it. That
I'll get used to it. That it will help my photography. I don't want to
learn to love it. The technology doesn't do anything for me.
So
Sylwester wrote:
No it doesn't. The estimate is that AS allows you in practice to go
down up to shutter speeds 2 stops slower, while IS/VR systems allow up
to 3 stops.
IS is 2 stops. VR 3 stops.
Pål
Cotty wrote:
So if I want to find out what's happening with the 2005 model year
Volkswagen, I search for 15 year old patents on the Ford web site then.
Sure, if it depends on the laws of physics. Why do you think there are so many
lens groups in an IS lens? Most of them is for correcting
Joseph wrote:
3. Is this why the forthcoming high-performance telezoom will be a D
FA? Reasoning: image stabilization is needed most of all for telephoto
shots, and a D FA lens has more unused edge glass than does a DA lens.
What high performance telezoom...?
Pål
Cotty wrote:
Joseph, surprisingly, heavier gear means more mass, and actually less
movement. A heavier lens/camera combo is actually easier to hand-hold,
although it does make your arms ache ;-)
That depends how heavy it is. Noone I know can held a 600mm lens stillIt is
too heavy... :-)
... isn't dust. It's these two spots.
You can see them on the full image.
Top center area.
Collin
So are you going to the one across the street (Oxford St.?) from the Pret,
or the one out by the round-a-bout?
(Just remember, if there's time to lean, there's time to clean.)
Regards, Bob S.
On 7/16/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15/7/05, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
Interesting Boris. Thanks for posting.
So maybe being called bird brain isn't such a bad thing g
Dave
On 7/16/05, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
http://tinyurl.com/c8422
Received this in my CodeProject newsletter...
Hope you'd have a chuckle...
Boris
Notice: Proud Parent Moment Upcoming:
My youngest, Claire, auditioned for, and got a part in the children's
chorus of a local production of a musical version Anne of Green
Gables. They're putting on about 40 shows in late July and throughout
August at the Thousand Islands Playhouse in
I'll see your tip and raise you one:
Get a little black rubber band to place around the eye-cup at the base. If
you have women at your place, chances are there's a stash of these bands,
just the right size, in your bathroom.
If you don't have women about, go to the camera clinic at GFM and get
The last month or two has been really busy for me. First there was
GFM. Then CMWC at NYC. Throw in several visits with my kids, and
there go most of my weekends.
This past week my housemate's brother was visiting, and since the
computer is in the spare room, access to the computer has been
Bill,
I'll bet you a Big Mac we can find film in your freezer and mine in 10 years.
July 16th, 2015
Regards, Bob S.
On 7/15/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Collin R Brendemuehl
Subject: It's the film cameras that are dead
Apple's
Link?
Dave
On 7/16/05, Collin R Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... isn't dust. It's these two spots.
You can see them on the full image.
Top center area.
Collin
Really nice Bruce.
I think I need a vacation. The local environment hasn't been very
inspiring lately :-)
Dave
On 7/16/05, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our guide told us that this basic scene was used in many of the old
westerns for the cowboy/outlaw riding off into the desert. They
Kenneth had asked if I worked this
area at all - he could see some
possible abstractions. I did take a bunch more of this sand area.
Here is one that is rather abstract.
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 400, 1/350 sec @ f/11
Converted from
http://www.oksne.net/paw/herdingants.html
Those little critters are hard to keep in focus when working hand
held. It's pretty much hit and miss, and this is the best I've managed
so far.
One particular problem with ants is that their hide is
Bruce,
A few years ago, I paid (dearly) for a guide who, as
it turned out, didn't know the location of this spot.
I didn't press it. Another example of my lack of
persistence (wimpyness) in such things.
Like your shot, but it appears sort of incomplete. It
simply says here it is now bring your
Nice shot Christian.
The expression of pure concentration is very much alive in the shot.
Great detail and lack of noise.
Thats a ton better then D2H at 320 i'll tell you.
One of these days.LOL
Dave
Just playing with 300mm candids during my
kid's swim
Dropped of my istD and Sigma 300 f4 for Brother Aaron to use at this
weekend Bluejay
AL
baseball game against Tampa Bay. He has press passes for the weekend and
submits photos to
the link
below as a Photo a Day feature.
http://www.battersbox.ca/
Another supurb shot Bruce.
Again you have nailed the exposure and just enough shadow detail.
The shot looks very sharp, showing great line work in the rocks.
They DO look like mittens.LOL
I think your shot on a wall with WW's BW version would look great.
Dave
On 16/7/05, Pål Jensen, discombobulated, unleashed:
That depends how heavy it is. Noone I know can held a 600mm lens
stillIt is too heavy... :-)
Agreed. Even a 300 2.8 is pushing it too much. I'm thinking of a 70-
200 2.8 zoom, with maybe a teleconverter as well. After half an hour, my
To check the firmware hold down the Menu button when you switch the power on.
Dave
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 09:06:41 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dropped of my istD and Sigma 300 f4 for Brother Aaron to use at this
weekend Bluejay
AL
baseball game against Tampa
On 16/7/05, Pål Jensen, discombobulated, unleashed:
IS is 2 stops. VR 3 stops.
Actually, I think it's what you can get away with. Some are steadier than
others, eh Steady ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Yep that was it.
Thanks Dave
Its version 1.00. I thinmk i stil have my download for version 1.10
Dave
To check the firmware hold down the Menu
button when you switch the power on.
Dave
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 09:06:41 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm with Godfrey here, only I use an incredibly inexpensive cosmetics brush.
As here:
http://194.100.88.243/petteri/pont/How_to/a_Brush_Your_Sensor/a_Brush_Your_Sensor.html
This is worth a read even if you don't end up doing it his way.
At 5:55 PM -0700 7/15/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I use
On 15/7/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm sick and tired of people telling me that I should be using new
technology.
I'm sick and tired of people telling me they're sick and tired . GRIN!
But really - a 40 yr old coffee mug??
Interesting your 'back to basics' instincts. I
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 6:27 PM
Subject: Re: Wow, maybe film *is* dead!
At the Wal-Mart photo lab where I work, at least 70% of the film we process
is from one time use cameras. It's now to the
My campout vacation pics have some
spots.
That's not good.
So I need to clean the sensor.
What's the recommended method here?
Collin
Its inevitable dust will haunt us all, except Tom Reese.LOL
I have used with great success a huricane blower,not
On 16/7/05, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
So are you going to the one across the street (Oxford St.?) from the Pret,
or the one out by the round-a-bout?
Oh, there's a small one near the TV studio in Abingdon. The class of
student they have in there beggars belief. I think one of them
On 15/7/05, Bruce Dayton, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/monumentvalley_0354.htm
Comments welcome
Nice again. Good use of composition Bruce :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
This week we got a new camera for work (Canon Ixus 50). Me being the
resident camera guy I was tasked with setting it up. Holy Crap! Give
me my *ist D any day. The amount of stuff buried in sub-sub-sub menus
is outrageous. (Remember the *ist D was my first ever digital camera)
Mind you, it takes
On 16/7/05, cbwaters, discombobulated, unleashed:
If
you have women at your place, chances are there's a stash of these bands,
just the right size, in your bathroom.
If you don't have women about, go to the camera clinic at GFM and get one
from Mark Roberts.
What, a woman???
Cheers,
On 16 Jul 2005 at 8:55, Bob W wrote:
As far as burgers themselves are concerned, probably not, but I've only had 2
or
3 McDonalds' burgers in my life. It's not an experience I subject myself to
willingly.
We have a chain called Wimpy which preceded McD by many years, and they were
LOL
I thought you were trying to eliminate variables g
Dave
On 7/16/05, Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Should leave plenty of room in the fridge to store
film, paper, chemistry, and a 12-pack too! ;-)
Don
I'm sure everyone has heard of the graph from Gartner Group about how
people in an organisation adopt new technology. There are pioneers,
that love to tinker with every new gadget. There are early adopters,
who quickly learn to reap benefits of new technology. These two groups
more or less
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oksne.net/paw/herdingants.html
So you had some tropical nights, hadn't you? ;-)
About two weeks of them, actually. I'm not adapted for that sort of
thing.
Me is pulling through the hottest days of the
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oksne.net/paw/herdingants.html
Pretty darn good for hand holding Jostein.
I like the cripsness of the ants and the eriee science fiction movie
feel to it.
Thanks Dave.
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen
Subject: Re: [OT] KM shows cheap DSLR with AS
That depends how heavy it is. Noone I know can held a 600mm lens
stillIt is too heavy... :-)
It wouldn't matter what a 600mm lens weighed, it's not a hand holdable focal
length.
William
- Original Message -
From: Bill Owens
Subject: Re: Wow, maybe film *is* dead!
At the Wal-Mart photo lab where I work, at least 70% of the film we
process is from one time use cameras. It's now to the point where close
to 50% of our prints come through the Fuji kiosk, and many of
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: Tip for ist D eye cup
What, a woman???
It's like pornography. Hard to define, but you'll know it when you see it.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Bob Sullivan
Subject: Re: It's the film cameras that are dead
Bill,
I'll bet you a Big Mac we can find film in your freezer and mine in 10
years.
July 16th, 2015
Not a safe bet for me. I have a film in my freezer that went stale in 1975.
I think it's
- Original Message -
From: Collin R Brendemuehl
Subject: Re: It's the film cameras that are dead
My thought is that the cameras will be more plentiful than the number of
users available.
This is already the case, actually it has been the case for a couple of
decades or more.
On Jul 16, 2005, at 1:33 PM, Pål Jensen wrote:
IS is 2 stops. VR 3 stops.
It depends more on testing man's hands stability ;-) I saw some tests
in which VR was slightly better and some where IS had an edge :-)
--
Best regards
Sylwek
On Jul 16, 2005, at 3:14 PM, Cotty wrote:
Agreed. Even a 300 2.8 is pushing it too much. I'm thinking of a 70-
200 2.8 zoom, with maybe a teleconverter as well. After half an hour,
my
muscles feel the strain.
I think the best way to use such a lenses hand-held, would be using
them like video
On Jul 16, 2005, at 4:24 PM, William Robb wrote:
It wouldn't matter what a 600mm lens weighed, it's not a hand holdable
focal length.
Even at 1/8000s? ;-)
--
Best regards
Sylwek
the SFX series does not auto rewind.
Yes, fortunately (and some have suggested others that are kind enough,
too.
With a MZ-series it should be possible to quickly power of the camera at
the end of the film or not?
Could be - I hope I never have to have to test that concept, though - g.
Fred
- Original Message -
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk
Subject: Re: [OT] KM shows cheap DSLR with AS
On Jul 16, 2005, at 4:24 PM, William Robb wrote:
It wouldn't matter what a 600mm lens weighed, it's not a hand holdable
focal length.
Even at 1/8000s? ;-)
If you could get a true 1/8000,
Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the Wal-Mart photo lab where I work, at least 70% of the film we process
is from one time use cameras. It's now to the point where close to 50% of
our prints come through the Fuji kiosk, and many of the orders from it are
in excess of 100 prints. To do
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Bob Sullivan
I'll bet you a Big Mac we can find film in your freezer and mine in 10
years.
July 16th, 2015
Not a safe bet for me. I have a film in my freezer that went stale in 1975.
I think it's getting processing that is going to be a problem.
After scanning my slides from the UK trip yesterday, I realized that
this was roll #2. I had completely forgotten that I shot two rolls of E6
over there... and now I can't find the first one anywhere. Cotty, if you
find a roll of slide film around your house I'd expect it's much more
likely to be
On Jul 16, 2005, at 5:01 PM, William Robb wrote:
If you could get a true 1/8000, maybe, but you can't get a true
shutter speed faster than sync.
That's true, only HSS, which has very limited range.
--
Best regards
Sylwek
Hi Don ... for some reason I didn't realize you were talking about film
development. My solution - very low tech - is to keep all the chemicals
and water at the same temp. There are several gallon jugs of distilled
water here, the working solution of developer, the working and stock
solution of
Just Diet Pepsi, can't drink none of that el-kee-haul no more. ;-)
Don
-Original Message-
From: David Savage [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 9:00 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Darkroom temperature control.
LOL
I thought you were trying
It is very hard to determine something as under or over exposed. The
reason is that the light is really what you are trying to control.
This is what makes or breaks your photo. So you have to decide what
you want the light to look like in relation to your subject and then
expose for that. Is a
Thanks for the tips Shel, they're good ones.
Yep, I've been bit by the BW bug again.
At the prices used darkroom stuff is going for these
days, it's a pretty cheap bug too! ;-)
I've paid about 10 cents on the dollar for the items
I didn't still have.
I'm setting up a pretty basic darkroom but I
On Jul 15, 2005, at 8:17 PM, Scott Loveless wrote:
A month or so ago I ordered a subscription to Lenswork Extended. It's
the entire magazine, plus a bunch of extra goodies, all in PDF format
on a CD. I couldn't be happier. http://www.lenswork.com/lwx.htm
I'm considering doing the same
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 06:12:42AM +0100, Cotty wrote:
On 15/7/05, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
I had hamburgers in England before the advent of McDonalds there...
Are you sure about that?
Yes.
Anyone who considers McDonalds to be the nadir of bad hamburgers
has never
Wow, this has been a looong thread!
I haven't got any posts regarding auto-rewind except this one.
What was the discussion about?
Don
-Original Message-
From: Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 9:42 AM
To: Markus Maurer
Subject: Re: I'm Getting an Auto
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 02:14:07PM +0100, Cotty wrote:
On 16/7/05, P?l Jensen, discombobulated, unleashed:
That depends how heavy it is. Noone I know can held a 600mm lens
stillIt is too heavy... :-)
Agreed. Even a 300 2.8 is pushing it too much. I'm thinking of a 70-
200 2.8 zoom,
Don't forget to get a good grain focuser.
http://tinyurl.com/d5slp
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Don Sanderson
Thanks for the tips Shel, they're good ones.
Yep, I've been bit by the BW bug again.
At the prices used darkroom stuff is going for these
days, it's a pretty cheap bug too!
On Jul 15, 2005, at 6:03 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
Test it. It doesn't degrade the image in or out of the active
shutter speeds
(not in my *ist D anyhow). I can't hear the difference between two
digital
devices connected using AES/EBU, wired co-axial or TOSLink optical
digital
audio
Not quite as good (powerful) but I have 2 of these:
http://www.adorama.com/DKFMG.html
Don
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 11:06 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Darkroom temperature control.
Don't forget
On Jul 16, 2005, at 6:31 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its inevitable dust will haunt us all, except Tom Reese.LOL
Dust has been haunting me since I started photography in 1968.
Nothing new...
I clean mine weekly and have had few problems.
Hmm. I've cleaned the DS sensor once since
On Jul 16, 2005, at 6:10 AM, Alan P. Hayes wrote:
I'm with Godfrey here, only I use an incredibly inexpensive
cosmetics brush.
As here:
http://194.100.88.243/petteri/pont/How_to/a_Brush_Your_Sensor/
a_Brush_Your_Sensor.html
This is worth a read even if you don't end up doing it his way.
From today's Chicago Tribune: Eastman Kodak increased 70 cents, to
$28.35, on speculation among traders that the company might be purchased
by Hewlett-Packard. Spokesmen for both companies declined to comment.
Hewlett-Packard advanced 31 cents, to $24.42.
1 - 100 of 215 matches
Mail list logo
