Very well done, Joe! Before the trip I took a look at Hovenweep on
the web, and it looked like it would not be that spetacular for
photography. Certainly in this case, the sky really makes the photo.
Very nice work.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, August 6, 2005, 6:30:28 PM, you wrote:
JT
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Haven't posted a PESO for a while, haven't had time to take many
pics. Snapshots can still be art(ful), I say.
Story: miss my last job because of the fun 'after-hours' social
sessions. Ex-workmate decided to part ways with that company recently.
The farewell was at
Does anyone have any ideas on how to make the Pentax 6x7 serrated
doughnut easier on eyeglasses? My last pair of glasses had the coating
on the right lens all scratched because of overzealous camera use. So my
35mm bodies now all wear an eyecup F (except for the well-designed PZ1
which
On Aug 6, 2005, at 11:49 PM, Derby Chang wrote:
Does anyone have any ideas on how to make the Pentax 6x7 serrated
doughnut easier on eyeglasses? My last pair of glasses had the
coating on the right lens all scratched because of overzealous
camera use.
In the past, on cameras that had a
On 6/8/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
BTW, Cotty, the Leica CL (in Japan they were badged as Leitz-Minolta
CL - same camera) are not at all the same as the Minolta CLE.
Cosmetically they're almost identical (although the CLE is a teensy
bit bigger), but inside they're different
On 6/8/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
Leica discontinued them as they were costing too much in warranty and
rework ... to their dismay, because it was quite a popular model.
Didn't Leica discontinue them *because* it was proving to be a popular
model? Popular and cheaper
Latest photo available now:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/26.htm
Comments, critique, flames all appreciated.
enjoy!
Godfrey
On Aug 7, 2005, at 12:37 AM, Cotty wrote:
Leica discontinued them as they were costing too much in warranty and
rework ... to their dismay, because it was quite a popular model.
Didn't Leica discontinue them *because* it was proving to be a popular
model? Popular and cheaper than all the
I've been reading various pieces on Luminous landscape about the Epson R-
D1 (digital M-mount rangefinder camera) and am seriously considering
tracking one down.
To bring this thread back on topic, somebody mentioned that a Pentax
digital rangefinder would be an interesting item, and I agree.
On 7/8/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
Something like 70% of the CL cameras delivered from Minolta evidently
needed substantial rework before they were ready to ship. That plus
the breakages on the meter mechanism just ate all the profit out of
the effort and also meant
Thanks! I knew the site, but only looked at it for body and lens
information till now. ...
Groeten,
Vic
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Sat, 6 Aug 2005, Vic Mortelmans wrote:
Does anyone perhaps know a comprehensive resource on the web about
flash photography (with Pentax, if it could?). I
On 6/8/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
he idea of
carrying a camera around for quick shots and stopping to check what mode
it's in, and maybe having to change the mode, seems like a self defeating
exercise. Leaving the camera in MF mode makes the most sense for me based
on
On 6/8/05, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
You know, just once it would be really nice if somebody could discuss
a style of photography, or a technology, that differed from the one they
chose for their own particular niche without being insultingly dismissive.
I'll second that.
On 6/8/05, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
And I've got here, in front of me, a local Delaware ale, Dogfish Head 90
Minute Imperial IPA.
So called for the length if time it takes to drink it.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Hi all,
I just checked my MZ-5n with an A* 135 f1.8, and yes it shows f1.7 in the
viewfinder for max. aperture.
Frank
I spent the afternoon with the camera and an AF lens. Mostly I used spot
AF. It's OK, but there are clearly limitations, and they pop up (for me)
unexpectedly. Perhaps
The interesting question is why a click on a Google link opens a
separate window for you. It doesn't in my Safari (or Explorer) and I
can see no setting that will make it do that either (a click on a
link in ANOTHER program can be chosen to have this effect but that is
a different case.)
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Aug 6, 2005, at 11:49 PM, Derby Chang wrote:
Does anyone have any ideas on how to make the Pentax 6x7 serrated
doughnut easier on eyeglasses? My last pair of glasses had the
coating on the right lens all scratched because of overzealous
camera use.
In the
On 7/8/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
After all , if Cotty can get people to show up, we can.LOL
yeah but they com to laugh
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 7/8/05, Frank Wajer, discombobulated, unleashed:
I just checked my MZ-5n with an A* 135 f1.8, and yes it shows f1.7 in the
viewfinder for max. aperture.
Some people really know how to rub it in.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
A snapshot...
http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/fullscreen.cgi?bilde=/bilder/
images/186304.jpgx=902y=603bg=FFid=186404
DagT
http://dag.foto.no
On 7/8/05, Bertil Holmberg, discombobulated, unleashed:
The interesting question is why a click on a Google link opens a
separate window for you. It doesn't in my Safari (or Explorer) and I
can see no setting that will make it do that either (a click on a
link in ANOTHER program can be
On 7/8/05, DagT, discombobulated, unleashed:
A snapshot...
http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/fullscreen.cgi?bilde=/bilder/
images/186304.jpgx=902y=603bg=FFid=186404
Try this:
http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/fullscreen.cgi?bilde=/bilder/
Cotty wrote:
On 6/8/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
Leica discontinued them as they were costing too much in warranty and
rework ... to their dismay, because it was quite a popular model.
Didn't Leica discontinue them *because* it was proving to be a popular
model?
On Aug 6, 2005, at 11:10 PM, David Savage wrote:
My advice is to do away with toolboxes if at all possible and use
shortcut keys, with practice it's much faster.
The stuff I have open (did I say toolboxes? I really meant palettes):
Histogram in all channels view (large size)
Navigator (sized
On Aug 7, 2005, at 12:09 PM, frank theriault wrote:
So, other than the above, I don't see how I'd be able to enable
myself.
Watch it Frank... I was almost severely punished for saying that not
long ago :)
- Brother Dave
On Aug 7, 2005, at 4:58 AM, Cotty wrote:
I have the Google preferences set so that
when I click on a result that interests me, it opens a new window and
displays the result in that.
Gee, I never looked at the Google preferences before. I'm so used to
using command-click that it's
Nice shot. The framing makes it a picture about the mother, which is
more interesting than a balanced look at the two. However I would crop
a bit from the left and quite a bit from the top. But that may be
strictly personal taste. Good work.
Paul
a matter of personal taste.On Aug 7, 2005,
Hi Frank
As long as you use film, a *good* scanner would be number one on your
enablement list, or not?
So, other than the above, I don't see how I'd be able to enable myself.
cheers,
frank
Here's a snapshot of a lovely young lady who happened by my house this
past Thursday. I believe she's in Minneapolis today, bound for Regina
shortly.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3611180size=lg
Cotty wrote:
I've been reading various pieces on Luminous landscape about the Epson R-
D1 (digital M-mount rangefinder camera) and am seriously considering
tracking one down.
Do you have a number of M-mount (or L-mount) len$e$ already?
keith
To bring this thread back on topic, somebody
On 7/8/05, keithw, discombobulated, unleashed:
Do you have a number of M-mount (or L-mount) len$e$ already?
Nope. I was hoping for some enablement :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
David Savage wrote:
I hope you didn't Kieth. It's just not worth it.
Dave
Once it's down, you don't even think about it! ;-)
keith
On 8/7/05, keithw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
All I've got in the house at the moment is a cold Fosters, but I'll grit
my teeth and drink a toast to
On 7/8/05, David Mann, discombobulated, unleashed:
Silly question: have you checked that your Google preferences haven't
reset themselves?
Yep. And I reset Safari on another machine. Not playing.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On 7/8/05, David Mann, discombobulated, unleashed:
If you open a link in the original Google window you can click on the
orange snap-back arrow in the Google search box, and it'll take you
straight back to the results.
Pardon me? I can't see any orange 'snap-back' arrow. Take me through it
On 7/8/05, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Here's a snapshot of a lovely young lady who happened by my house this
past Thursday. I believe she's in Minneapolis today, bound for Regina
shortly.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3611180size=lg
Heavens - she using a Mac?
I have spent the last week with some friends at the Chateau du Bailleul,
outside Gorron in the department of La Mayenne. Here are some photos I took
on the first day, with a 2 megapixel ps, of Sophia boating round the moat:
http://www.web-options.com/Gorron/Bob/Gorron004.jpg
Gautam Sarup wrote:
I do like my M6TTL. Thought Leica overpriced till I got it
but now I'm hooked on it paired to the 50mm Elmar-M.
I've always had a desire for one of these myself. I haven't looked at going
prices for over a year now, so I don't know if the digital age has made a
dent on
On 7/8/05, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
I have spent the last week with some friends at the Chateau du Bailleul,
outside Gorron in the department of La Mayenne.
Alma says and he didn't invite us!! ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
spyware scanner? otherwise, the only reliable way is to reinstall Windows
over top of itself and then reapply all the updates.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Butch Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Cc: Butch Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2005
On 8/7/05, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a snapshot of a lovely young lady who happened by my house this
past Thursday. I believe she's in Minneapolis today, bound for Regina
shortly.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3611180size=lg
Hi, Ann!
(nice snap, Paul)
On 8/6/05, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nonsense, it's only a 20 some hour flight. Goes by so fast you'd
hardly notice. VBG
I don't mind 20 hours on a plane. It's the cost that'll kill me.
Congrats on the new job.
Thanks, Dave!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois
On 8/7/05, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have spent the last week with some friends at the Chateau du Bailleul,
outside Gorron in the department of La Mayenne. Here are some photos I took
on the first day, with a 2 megapixel ps, of Sophia boating round the moat:
I hate this one:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3611289
Because I didn't take it. Tofu says, Gimme the camera so I can take
a shot. So I set it up for exposure and hyperfocus range, and hand
it to him. Then the bastard goes and takes the best shot on the roll!
LOL
This is the
Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Latest photo available now:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/26.htm
Comments, critique, flames all appreciated.
Hey, you're channeling Frank!
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
On 8/7/05, Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Frank
As long as you use film, a *good* scanner would be number one on your
enablement list, or not?
Honestly, no. As you saw, it wasn't on my list of desire. Here's
my thinking:
First, I'll likely end up going digital at some point. Why
On 8/7/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Latest photo available now:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/26.htm
Comments, critique, flames all appreciated.
I like it.
A lot.
Throw convention out the window; take and show photos that ~look
good~, even though
On 8/7/05, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A snapshot...
http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/fullscreen.cgi?bilde=/bilder/
images/186304.jpgx=902y=603bg=FFid=186404
DagT
http://dag.foto.no
Makes me smile!
vbg -(just like that)
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois
On 8/7/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But which of them is Carlos?
Since you don't know him, does it really make a difference? LOL He
is, however, the one on the left - the one who's sort of the least
blurry g - but I guess since they're both grinning, who'd know?
Fun
On 8/7/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/8/05, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
And I've got here, in front of me, a local Delaware ale, Dogfish Head 90
Minute Imperial IPA.
So called for the length if time it takes to drink it.
I thought perhaps it was in a bottle
Tell Tofu that's a great shot Frank!
Did you teach him the Rule of Thirds or does
he just have the eye?
I really like that CL lens, very sharp with a nice
transition to OOF areas.
In case you didn't catch my question yesterday,
how do you communicate with the messengers to
dispatch them.
I've
On 8/6/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snap
I wiped off the camera with a damp rag, but couldn't get all the mud off,
however the camera worked well. For years there remained some mud embedded
in the leatherette - a badge of honor, so to speak.
You win, Shel!
Best story so far,
Just finished watching a documentary about Australian photographer
Frank Hurley (Frank Hurley - Man Who Made History
http://tinyurl.com/a968h ). Probably best known for his shots taken
during Shackleton's Antarctic expedition. My favorite is a shot of the
Endurance trapped in the ice, taken at
Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In case you didn't catch my question yesterday,
how do you communicate with the messengers to
dispatch them.
They use VHF two-way radios, for the most part. I know this because, for
the convoy down to Grandfather Mountain in June, Dave and Frank brought
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have spent the last week with some friends at the Chateau du
Bailleul, outside Gorron in the department of La Mayenne.
Alma says and he didn't invite us!! ;-)
I didn't organise it - the week was organised by an
Thanks Mark.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2005 8:26 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: Goof on a Roof
Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In case you didn't catch my question yesterday,
how do
Hi!
If you have *istD and 43 Lim, I suggest you try this:
1. Set AF mode to green (automatic). Set camera to S.AF.
2. Set camera to Manual Focus
3. Flick the AF mode switch to select position and then back to
Green position.
4. Now, try to focus the lens manually. You may notice that not only
On 8/7/05, Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tell Tofu that's a great shot Frank!
I know! That really pisses me off. vbg
Did you teach him the Rule of Thirds or does
he just have the eye?
Are you kidding? We were having a few beers on the roof (as you can
see from what the subject's
On 8/7/05, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They use VHF two-way radios, for the most part. I know this because, for
the convoy down to Grandfather Mountain in June, Dave and Frank brought
along a pair of walkie-talkies so we could easily communicate between
vehicles. Frank kept
- Original Message -
From: Derby Chang
Subject: Pentax 6x7 eyeglass saver
Does anyone have any ideas on how to make the Pentax 6x7 serrated doughnut
easier on eyeglasses? My last pair of glasses had the coating on the right
lens all scratched because of overzealous camera use. So
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: First attempt with auto focus
On 7/8/05, Frank Wajer, discombobulated, unleashed:
I just checked my MZ-5n with an A* 135 f1.8, and yes it shows f1.7 in the
viewfinder for max. aperture.
Some people really know how to rub it in.
It's available in Philly. The last few bottles of a
case of 60 minute IPA are in my fridge.
Rick
--- Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS: Dogfish Head may not be available in PA
http://www.dogfish.com/beer/distributors.cfm but if
you're ever in Rehoboth,
go to the brew pub and ask for
I actually found that very interesting. Thanks Frank.
Good question Don.
Dave
On 8/7/05, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/7/05, Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tell Tofu that's a great shot Frank!
I know! That really pisses me off. vbg
Did you teach him the
I don't know anything about flash, so how can I remember anything about a
TTL system. I still don't know what a flash system might be. To me, a
flash is just some kind of light that goes off when the camera shutter is
tripped. It's not a part of my photography.
Shel
[Original Message]
This line in the article really makes me laugh: This is really a big deal
since Leica photogs are legendary for preferring small cameras. The Leica
M is NOT a small camera, nor is it particularly light.
Shel
[Original Message]
Cotty
Just FYI, you may or may not find these ramblings
- Original Message -
From: Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's available in Philly. The last few bottles of a
case of 60 minute IPA are in my fridge.
That's good to know.
I have a half a case of the 60 too. But once I discovered the 90 I
haven't touched the 60. The Imortale is
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2005 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: OT: Some Good Gnus
On 8/7/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/8/05, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
And I've got here, in front
On Aug 7, 2005, at 4:27 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 7/8/05, David Mann, discombobulated, unleashed:
If you open a link in the original Google window you can click on the
orange snap-back arrow in the Google search box, and it'll take you
straight back to the results.
Pardon me? I can't see any
On Aug 7, 2005, at 5:57 AM, frank theriault wrote:
But which of them is Carlos?
Since you don't know him, does it really make a difference? LOL He
is, however, the one on the left - the one who's sort of the least
blurry g - but I guess since they're both grinning, who'd know?
I was
I've heard you assert I don't know anything about flash many times
now, Shel. Given that the question of flash usage comes up so
frequently, why don't you read up about it, both the basics and the
Pentax flash system notions on Bojidar's site? The information is
useful to know whether or
I shoot a Canon EOS 20D. Here are a few suggestions: (i) don't forget that
you can change ISO whenever you want to; (ii) save both RAW and small .jpg
files, use the RAW for image processing printing and use the .jpg for fast
directory browsing (thumbnails) and low res purposes (emailing to
D1X is a very fine camera, one that you can still find in at many
smaller newsdesks. The AF is super fast and as accurate as AF gets. However,
it's still of the earlier generations DSLRs, so there are some quirks.
It's, along with Canon 1D, a big battery eater. Hope your friend brings
extra
Sunday, August 7, 2005, 4:41:23 PM, Shel wrote:
SB This line in the article really makes me laugh: This is really a big deal
SB since Leica photogs are legendary for preferring small cameras. The Leica
SB M is NOT a small camera, nor is it particularly light.
Not wanting to argue, just my
On Aug 7, 2005, at 12:52 AM, Cotty wrote:
Just FYI, you may or may not find these ramblings interesting:
http://www.cameraquest.com/leicacl.htm
scroll down to:
Leica CL Production Mystery Solved - - or at least part of it
Thanks.
I've read Steve's page before. I tend to credit source of
Ah, I see ... You posted the last shot in a different thread.
On Aug 7, 2005, at 5:40 AM, frank theriault wrote:
I hate this one:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3611289
Because I didn't take it. Tofu says, Gimme the camera so I can take
a shot. So I set it up for exposure and
I don't like flash. I don't have a need for it. It doesn't fit with the
type of photography I do. I don't want to learn something new right now. I
think flash is intrusive and annoying. I don't want to carry more
equipment around with me. The world is already lit well enough for me. I
enjoy
On Aug 7, 2005, at 7:57 AM, Frantisek wrote:
Sunday, August 7, 2005, 4:41:23 PM, Shel wrote:
SB This line in the article really makes me laugh: This is
really a big deal
SB since Leica photogs are legendary for preferring small
cameras. The Leica
SB M is NOT a small camera, nor is it
Thanks for the two (so far) tips on using the D1X. Friend says it
overexposures by 1/3 stop so has it programed to compensate for it. Was
aware of the dirt problem with sensor. The problem with this cameara is it
is a field camera in that it operates in military situations in the dry
prairies so
On Aug 7, 2005, at 8:19 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
[snip...]
Does that answer your question?
So then why do you persist in responding to people with I don't know
anything about flash? You might simply say, Thanks, but I'm not
particularly interested in knowing much about flash. rather than
I'm currently trying to 'enable' me with the cheapest sort of scanner:
we happen to own a Canon G2 digital camera (fast lens!, that was my
major requirement when bying the digital camera) and it takes filters,
so I'll by a close-up lens for it (49mm thread, so if I want, it can be
used on the
Sometimes: compare the Pentax M85/2.0 with the Leica 90mm Summicron, or
even the 90mm Elmarit. Compare the Pentax K50/1.4 or M50/1.4 with the
Leica 50mm Summilux. Or the Noctilux with the Pentax K or A 50/1.2. Or
the Leica 75mm/1.4 with the Pentax 77mm Ltd. The M3/M2 weighs within a few
I don't consider the comment dismissive or disingenuous. Just reiterating
my position. I've read John's comments. In this case someone says that I
should remember something about a flash system. Replying that I don't
know anything about flash, and therefore have nothing to remember, seems a
lot
D1X is a very fine camera...
Be a bit more careful with overexposure, the sensor is older and has a
teeny bit less latitude so highlights can clip a bit more easily.
Frantisek
The same would apply to the D? Are recent sensors (any brand) better
on that respect?
Andre
The Leica M is
pretty much the same size relative to a Domke F5XB that a Nikon FM/
FE3 is, but the lenses are a little smaller for their focal length.
Sometimes: compare the Pentax M85/2.0 with the Leica 90mm
Summicron, or
even the 90mm Elmarit. Compare the Pentax K50/1.4 or M50/1.4
with
On 7/8/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3611289
My God, it's a Harold Lloyd movie!!!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Shel -
The answer to this is actually quite simple. A flash system is
approximately 1.5 times the price of a simple flash. It's also very
likely that it will have a couple of extra buttons that you'll never
remember how to use.
Guys from our generation probably referred to them as fancy flash
that's exactly what I was thinking about, but couldn't remember the name!
Great photo, with a wonderful use of focus. Whoever set the aperture and
focus seems to know what's what.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 August 2005 17:30
On Aug 7, 2005, at 7:54 AM, Vic Mortelmans wrote:
I'm currently trying to 'enable' me with the cheapest sort of
scanner: we happen to own a Canon G2 digital camera (fast lens!,
that was my major requirement when bying the digital camera) and it
takes filters, so I'll by a close-up lens for
Too bad the DVD is not available in the US :-((
Another Frank Hurley link:
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/corp/features/endurance/
Shel
[Original Message]
From: David Savage
Just finished watching a documentary about Australian photographer
Frank Hurley (Frank Hurley - Man Who Made History
That's amazingly good Frank...
Especially since it was taken with one of your cameras.
frank theriault wrote:
I hate this one:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3611289
Because I didn't take it. Tofu says, Gimme the camera so I can take
a shot. So I set it up for exposure and
I would say it has always been at the small end of camera lens sizes in
its market.
Among exchangeable-lens cameras intended for professional applications it
has been at the small end since it came out, and continues to be. Some
Pentax M and Olympus OM cameras don't change the overall tendency.
This is a flash system:
http://www.linkmuseum.org/index-1.html
Wish I could find a better pic on the net. I've a big print of this here
at home. Amazing!
Shel
[Original Message]
From: George Sinos
The answer to this is actually quite simple. A flash system is
approximately 1.5 times
I use an old Gossen Lunasix F. It's quite accurate.
A used on e woild probably cost less than 100 USD.
Why do you want 5 degrees?
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 3. august 2005 16:09
Ahhh ... here's a better pic ;-))
http://www.soulcatcherstudio.com/exhibitions/link/link_thom.html
http://tinyurl.com/exj5c
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Shel Belinkoff
This is a flash system:
http://www.linkmuseum.org/index-1.html
Wish I could find a better pic on the net. I've a
On 7/8/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
Ahhh ... here's a better pic ;-))
http://www.soulcatcherstudio.com/exhibitions/link/link_thom.html
http://tinyurl.com/exj5c
*love* the tilly lamp
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Using a digital camera as a scanner is generally quick and easy, once
you get a setup that workbut the results are rarely as good as a
cheap film scanner.
The speed is the one that triggered me by most. My experience with
scanning photographs on a (cheap)
On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
my position. I've read John's comments. In this case someone says that I
should remember something about a flash system.
I started a response to this, but decided that someone or other is not
worth it.
Kostas
I think someone mentioned you were channeling Frank, but in a good way.
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Latest photo available now:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/26.htm
Comments, critique, flames all appreciated.
enjoy!
Godfrey
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in
This one time, at band camp, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use an old Gossen Lunasix F. It's quite accurate.
A used on e woild probably cost less than 100 USD.
Why do you want 5 degrees?
I wish to measure the fall off of reflected light across background
when a flash is used. eg: if I
What is its market? If the market is interchangeable lens rangefinders,
both the Bessa R series and the Konica Hexar are lighter, the Bessa is
smaller as well, and the Konica, while similar in size, actually has less
volume. Why does the Leica have to be compared with the top-end Nikons and
DagT wrote:
A snapshot...
http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/fullscreen.cgi?bilde=/bilder/images/186304.jpgx=902y=603bg=FFid=186404
DagT
http://dag.foto.no
Shades of The Prisoner! ;-)
keith whaley
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo
