If you own
- a small bowl and a piece of bicycle inner tire (this to unscrew the label
plate and collecting screws)
- a stick of wood and two nails hit through it (this as an -unadjustable-
spanner)
- a small screwdriver
- very basic understanding of mechanics and enough self-confidence
then you
On 10/8/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://k43.pbase.com/v3/20/519320/1/46279745.IMG_212201.jpg
The distance between the two point where her hands connect with that rig
suggest more movement than if the hands were further apart. Her ideal
handhold would be on the largest
On 10/8/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
Continuing inexorably on my quest to sort, collate, organize and
process UK-Isle of Man trip photos, I discovered this one...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/27.htm
Comments, critique, flames always appreciated.
VERY
On 10/8/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Ann has arrived in Regina, and has been fed and watered.
Make sure she has plenty of straw bedding.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On Aug 11, 2005, at 4:06 PM, William Robb wrote:
http://k43.pbase.com/v3/20/519320/1/46279745.IMG_212201.jpg
Big lens safety rule #1: don't put the strap around your neck.
- Dave
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Great for Canon users, doesn't help if you don't own Canon Glass. If
I were starting from scratch I don't think I'd care if the sensor was
APS sized, and then the 12mp Nikon would be just fine.
Surely a 12Mp 24x36 sensor has several advantages over a, what is it,
The dark side does it again, another full frame, arghh. Will Pentax ever
release a full frame.
Frank
It's a hoax
look at dpreview in the 1dsMKII forum
On 8/11/05, Frank Wajer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The dark side does it again, another full frame, arghh. Will Pentax ever
release a full frame.
Frank
Frank Wajer wrote on 11.08.05 11:27:
The dark side does it again, another full frame, arghh. Will Pentax ever
release a full frame.
So far it is only rumour... And no, Pentax will never produce FF :-)
--
Balance is the ultimate good...
Best Regards
Sylwek
Herb Chong wrote:
there is one close enough. it's in the Leica R digital back.
Hmmm...
* Image Sensor: 3872 x 2576 Pixels (10 MPixel) CCD-Chip, active
sensor area 26.4 x 17.6 mm, focal length extension factor 1.37
[ From
keithw wrote:
I can't help you with respect to the Pentax scope.
However, I've been so pleased with all my Pentax gear over the years, I
would have no hesitancy at all to buy one!
Scott,
You can find quite a few Pentax scope references if you go to Google.com
then search GROUPS for Pentax
William Robb wrote:
http://k43.pbase.com/v3/20/519320/1/46279745.IMG_212201.jpg
Amazing. A $6000+ lens and they won't spring for a $50 monopod.
Tom Reese
Very nice family portrait. I wish the man (that sittin on the floow)
took any other (more authentic) pose
On 8/11/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/8/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
Continuing inexorably on my quest to sort, collate, organize and
process UK-Isle
i hope her accommodations are better than the typical barn.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discuss pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 12:07 AM
Subject: Travels of AnnSan
Ann has arrived in Regina, and has been fed
Very nice. It places the performer in the context of the empty
hallways, which I would guess are in a train or subway station.
On Aug 11, 2005, at 12:40 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Four weeks behind, but I'm gaining on the target:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/28.htm
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Frank Wajer wrote:
The dark side does it again, another full frame, arghh. Will Pentax ever
release a full frame.
No. They are committed to APS-C for 35mm.
Kostas
Tom Reese wrote:
keithw wrote:
I can't help you with respect to the Pentax scope.
However, I've been so pleased with all my Pentax gear over the years,
I would have no hesitancy at all to buy one!
Scott,
You can find quite a few Pentax scope references if you go to Google.com
then
William Robb wrote:
http://k43.pbase.com/v3/20/519320/1/46279745.IMG_212201.jpg
William Robb
hah, hah...she never noticed that little threaded hole in the bottom,
and thought it was sort of oddly shaped for a hand grip...
keith
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Cotty wrote:
Sorry Mark - they should be! Even if they only build couple a thousand of
the damned things. They should be.
You read it here first: Cotty is selling his big grey private jet to
fund Pentax's RD and losses for the FF model. Here he is taking
pictures for
Hi Joe
I like both of your photos and such places are always interesting to watch
for me.
But, I'm happy not to live there ;-)
Must have been enormous sunny, even with the polarizer the photos are quite
bright.
greetings
Markus
Real Southwest 1:
Gee, Tom, now I feel like a big dope. g I didn't even think about
trying groups. Thanks for the heads-up. Adding burris to your
search returns some interesting discussions. It seems that Pentax
scopes are made by Burris using Pentax glass. I'll keep reading.
Thanks, Tom!
On 8/11/05, Tom
Hi Tom
I disagree strongly here.
I like to see as much sides of the world here as PESO as possible and not
just the beautiful ones.
This list seems already quite limited regarding this and sometimes even
censored in my opinion.
greetings
Markus
You asked for reactions so I suppose you won't mind
Hi Joe
I think that this forum is about Pentax and photography and not about beauty
alone.
Showing only beautiful things here is a severe limitation and a denial of
real life.
Please keep posting interesting photos like that.
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Tainter
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Frank Wajer wrote:
The dark side does it again, another full frame, arghh. Will Pentax
ever release a full frame.
No. They are committed to APS-C for 35mm.
Or maybe they are committed to whatever sensor-size they can get at a
reasonable
Michael Spivak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a hoax
Well not according to Bob Shell:
Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's real. We've known about it for a bit. 12 MP full-frame sensor,
2.5 inch LCD monitor, 3 frames per second, about US $ 3,500 street
price when it gets here. It's
keithw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Reese wrote:
keithw wrote:
I can't help you with respect to the Pentax scope.
However, I've been so pleased with all my Pentax gear over the years,
I would have no hesitancy at all to buy one!
You can find quite a few Pentax scope references if you go
See, you can hand hold the 67.
http://people.freenet.de/wildehilde/mischa/barton-malibu-006.jpg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
I always knew that. :-)
Now i just need tighter jeans(ohhh that s a scary thought.)
Thanks
Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Frank Wajer wrote:
The dark side does it again, another full frame, arghh. Will Pentax
ever release a full frame.
No. They are committed to APS-C for 35mm.
Or maybe they are committed to whatever
If it is a hoax, my usually-reliable sources fell for it. Personally,
I don't know if this is or isn't a hoax, but it conforms to the new
Canon we have been getting leaks about for a while. So far as I know,
Canon has not officially commented on it yet.
I'll let you folks know if I learn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See, you can hand hold the 67.
http://people.freenet.de/wildehilde/mischa/barton-malibu-006.jpg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
I always knew that. :-)
Now i just need tighter jeans(ohhh that s a scary
Bob Shell wrote:
If it is a hoax, my usually-reliable sources fell for it. Personally,
I don't know if this is or isn't a hoax, but it conforms to the new
Canon we have been getting leaks about for a while.
Could it be a mixture of both? I mean, some clever people having made
these
Keith W. asked:
You can find quite a few Pentax scope references if you go to Google.com
then search GROUPS for Pentax Scope.
Could you elaborate on that just a little, Tom?
Seems that is a way to search group interest lists for messages by
subject? Hmmm. Gotta look into that!
There
Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it is a hoax, my usually-reliable sources fell for it. Personally,
I don't know if this is or isn't a hoax, but it conforms to the new
Canon we have been getting leaks about for a while. So far as I know,
Canon has not officially commented on it yet.
One of the nicest rural mailbox images I've ever seen BG
I love the double locks.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESOs: The Real Southwest
Don't blame me. Shel and Bruce inspired me to take and post these.
Real Southwest 1:
Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
If it is a hoax, my usually-reliable sources fell for it. Personally,
I don't know if this is or isn't a hoax, but it conforms to the new
Canon we have been getting leaks about for a while.
Could it be a mixture of both?
There's no
Someone just asked me a question about Version 1 (Kiron) of the Vivitar
70-210 Series 1 and I can't answer it because I only have version 3
(Komine). They want to know how you put it into macro mode.
Perhaps I should add this to my Vivitar page
http://www.robertstech.com/vivitar.htm
--
Mark
Yes, but I don't think that my hands would be very steady aiming at that
subject . . .
See, you can hand hold the 67.
http://people.freenet.de/wildehilde/mischa/barton-malibu-006.jpg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
Nice lens!
William Robb wrote:
http://k43.pbase.com/v3/20/519320/1/46279745.IMG_212201.jpg
William Robb
and put away wet? V B G
Kenneth Waller
(who just couldn't miss finishing the line)
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Travels of AnnSan
Ann has arrived in Regina, and has been fed and watered.
William Robb
And the wimps here think you need a tripod for big glass
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Check out the bipod
http://k43.pbase.com/v3/20/519320/1/46279745.IMG_212201.jpg
William Robb
then you actually are a repair person...
No, but he sleeps in a Holiday Inn Express
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Aug 11, 2005 2:01 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Lens repair
If you own
- a small bowl and a piece of
Mark Roberts wrote on 11.08.05 14:45:
If the D5 proves to be real it'll be pretty close to my guess. Perhaps
they are using a different sensor because found a more economic
fabrication process. Perhaps the price will eventually fall to my $3000
figure. We'll see...
We'll see if PDML would
- Original Message -
From: Toralf Lund
Subject: Re: canon eos d5
The camera manufacturers also committed themself to
many different film formats over time, didn't they?
Since WWII, there has really only been a few film formats for the more
advanced film user.
William Robb
Hi!
If it is a hoax, my usually-reliable sources fell for it. Personally,
I don't know if this is or isn't a hoax, but it conforms to the new
Canon we have been getting leaks about for a while. So far as I know,
Canon has not officially commented on it yet.
I'll let you folks know if I
On 11/8/05, Kostas Kavoussanakis, discombobulated, unleashed:
You read it here first: Cotty is selling his big grey private jet to
fund Pentax's RD and losses for the FF model. Here he is taking
pictures for the ebay auction:
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/spare5.html
Ha! I would if I could.
LOL... you've steal the words from my fingers :-)
On 8/11/05, Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, but I don't think that my hands would be very steady aiming at that
subject . . .
See, you can hand hold the 67.
Hi Vic:
Oh man, I'm not sure about this...
I've taken apart most of my Mamiyaflex TLR lenses to remove some fungus
and haze.
But I haven't yet acquired the confidence to do the same with my old
500mm Takumar which in addition to some glass cleaning, needs some work
on a loose focusing
On Aug 11, 2005, at 1:43 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
Yep. I've always been wondering how much of that, say, $2000 extra
is actually made up by the sensor cost, though. It's often
mentioned on this list and elsewhere how expensive FF sensors are,
but does anyone know what they actually cost?
- Original Message -
From: Jim Hemenway
Subject: Re: Lens repair
A stick with two nails... hmmm.
Works like a hot damn to remove lens bezels.
William Robb
Unless one slips and does in an element. A bit more than possible in
my case. ;-)
Jim
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Jim Hemenway Subject: Re: Lens repair
A stick with two nails... hmmm.
Works like a hot damn to remove lens bezels.
William Robb
Is the FA 50mm 1.4 gone or has production has been cut back. Everyone
seems to be OOS of the lens.
John G
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 67 sighting
Now i just need tighter jeans(ohhh that s a scary thought.)
That is beyond scarey.
I'd rather see Baugher in a miniskirt.
WW
Sounds like fun at GFM 2006 lol
Off-topic generally but related to this: I once watched a TV show about
the photographing of the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue, and was
pretty amazed to see the photographer, a petite young woman,
hand-holding a Mamiya RB (or RZ? I couldn't tell
Is the FA 50mm 1.4 gone or has production has been cut back.
Everyone seems to be OOS of the lens.
John G
I have also been waiting for the lens for over 2 months now (ordered
from Pentax Japan by Pentax Canada) while the 35/2 was readily
available. It is not shown on Pentax Canada site...
Hey gang.
I have been scrolling the Apple Canada web iste lately, and have a few
questions re the
14 iBook and
the 15 Powerbook.
If i upgrade the 14 with 1g memeory the hard drive to 80g ,Super Drive and add
the 3 year
extened
warranty, its a bout the same price as the 15 Powerbook,with out
At 12mp bigger it isn't enough better. Not enough to justify the total
system price, IMNSHO. I've got a lot of glass I'd have to replace, many
of my lenses have special characteristics. I have a much bigger
investment in glass than in bodies. Unlike Cotty, I'm not willing to
modify my lenses
FYI: Shows on Pentax USA site. Did not check price.
Jack
--- Andre Langevin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is the FA 50mm 1.4 gone or has production has been
cut back.
Everyone seems to be OOS of the lens.
John G
I have also been waiting for the lens for over 2
months now (ordered
from
Not what sprung to my mind but it will do.
Cotty wrote:
On 10/8/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Ann has arrived in Regina, and has been fed and watered.
Make sure she has plenty of straw bedding.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
It was predicted that Pentax would never release a DSLR...
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Frank Wajer wrote on 11.08.05 11:27:
The dark side does it again, another full frame, arghh. Will Pentax ever
release a full frame.
So far it is only rumour... And no, Pentax will never produce FF
On Aug 11, 2005, at 7:23 AM, John Graves wrote:
Is the FA 50mm 1.4 gone or has production has been cut back.
Everyone seems to be OOS of the lens.
They come in at BH in small batches. Put yourself on a notifier at
BH and Adorama, you can pick one up the next time they get stock.
BH had
That's your reactions Markus, and they are perfectly valid. Joe asked for
my reactions and I gave him mine.
I wasn't criticizing the photos, they're just not my cup of tea.
Tom C.
From: Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject:
Is the FA 50mm 1.4 gone or has production has been cut back.
Everyone seems to be OOS of the lens.
They come in at BH in small batches. Put yourself on a notifier at
BH and Adorama, you can pick one up the next time they get stock.
BH had a few last week or the week before.
Don't use an e-mail program, they're not designed for it, (though they
do work). Get a news reader program, some are free or almost so.
Tom Reese wrote:
Keith W. asked:
You can find quite a few Pentax scope references if you go to Google.com
then search GROUPS for Pentax Scope.
Hi Pentax lovers
I tried a new flash setup on the Pentax SFXn with the 90mm Tamron macro.
The Pentax AF400T hammerhead flash slightly turned to the right side and
from above the camera and a handkerchief mounted in front of the flash
reflector. TTL flashed, film was Agfa ISO 200.
The two bees
I don't remember exactly but you have to set them either to 70mm or
210mm, (I can't remember which), press the white locking tabs and turn
the collar to the right, with the lens pointed tword the target, IIRC.
Mark Roberts wrote:
Someone just asked me a question about Version 1 (Kiron) of
Mark Roberts wrote:
Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
If it is a hoax, my usually-reliable sources fell for it. Personally,
I don't know if this is or isn't a hoax, but it conforms to the new
Canon we have been getting leaks about for a while.
Could
On 8/11/05, Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We'll see if PDML would survive then :-P I guess if it comes true almost
every PDML would go and buy it - after all it is possible to mount K lenses
on EF cameras, as some mebers showed us :-P
Uh, why would people using $800-$1200 DSLRs
Depends on needs i suppose.
I replaced my film camera that i used when i first didi equine shows(K1000,
$300.
Canadian) with a
used D1($5000 Canadian)however that was the only choice at the time, other than
the Kodak
which
had horible reviews.
Dave
Uh,
For Photoshop, probably having more memory is the most important
thing, given the two machines you mention. But I'll let others
comment. My 12' PB has only 512Mb, and I have no trouble working with
full size files from the istD. 1Gb would be nice, though.
To do wireless, you need a wireless hub
http://k43.pbase.com/v3/20/519320/1/46279745.IMG_212201.jpg
William Robb
--
Wheatfield, you rat! You did make poor Ann heft your A* 600 f5.6. You
should be ashamed.
Joe
Juan Buhler wrote:
On 8/11/05, Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We'll see if PDML would survive then :-P I guess if it comes true almost
every PDML would go and buy it - after all it is possible to mount K lenses
on EF cameras, as some mebers showed us :-P
Uh, why would
I posted this last night, but it has not shown up on the archive. So
apologies if everyone has seen this before.
Joe
Joseph Tainter wrote:
Okay, maybe I need to go into this a bit more deeply.
Real Southwest 1:
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/mypics/535671/display/3704299
The Navajo
On 11/8/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'd rather see Baugher in a miniskirt.
Well he's got the legs.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
This lens made me think of Crocodile Dundee: That's not a lens, THIS is a
lens :-)
Jens
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Joseph Tainter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 11. august 2005 18:28
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: Check
On 11/8/05, Juan Buhler, discombobulated, unleashed:
Uh, why would people using $800-$1200 DSLRs and people using film
cameras so naturally go for a $3000 DSLR?
Because they could save as much again on film, processing (and maybe even
printing) costs?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
Hi Joe,
You've reminded me of something I think about often and wrote about a
day or two ago.
Nice narrative. Thank you.
The point I'm attempting to make is that some photos may be 'enhanced'
by a story, whereas others standalone without one. I guess it depends
what one's intent is, and
On 11/8/05, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
Unlike Cotty, I'm not willing to
modify my lenses in such a way that they won't work normally.
My Pentax lenses all work normally :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On 11/8/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
One last question. It comes with built in wireless with airport express
and bluetooth.
What do i need
extra if i want to web wireledssly, any other devises. I'm clueless to
wireless.
The iBooks and PowerBooks come with Airport cards
On 8/11/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/8/05, Juan Buhler, discombobulated, unleashed:
Uh, why would people using $800-$1200 DSLRs and people using film
cameras so naturally go for a $3000 DSLR?
Because they could save as much again on film, processing (and maybe even
printing)
Without taking into account computer upgrades and software cost the you
could shoot
250 rolls of Color film with processing, (assuming a $12/roll for film
and processing)
for the cost of the $3000.00 DSLR. Assume shooting 1 roll a week on
average you're
talking about 5 years to make that money
How could anything work normaly for you? :-)
Cotty wrote:
On 11/8/05, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
Unlike Cotty, I'm not willing to
modify my lenses in such a way that they won't work normally.
My Pentax lenses all work normally :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
I gave in last night, and ordered a brand new FA28/2.8 from BH.
Should be here tomorrow.
I love the FA35, but it is sometimes too narrow on the istD as a
normal. Maybe the 28 will be the new standard lens for me.
Thanks list for all the advice on this lens when I asked!
j
--
Juan Buhler
Good to hear Juan.
I use the A28 on my istD and think its a great FL.
Dave
I gave in last night, and ordered a
brand new
FA28/2.8 from BH.
Should be here tomorrow.
I love the FA35, but it is sometimes too narrow on the istD as a
normal. Maybe the
Cotty babled:
The iBooks and PowerBooks come with Airport cards installed in them. You
still need to buy either an Airport Base Station or an Airport Express
and hook up to the internet. If you're on broadband, then simply plug up
your broadband modem
Herb Chong wrote:
the cost savings on a camera of that price is negligible.
Yeah. Much like the savings of putting a crippled K-mount on a $1500
camera, or whatever the original price of the *istD was...
they can offer it on a $300 body. leaving it off of a $3500 body is
marketing and not
Close enough.
Toralf Lund wrote:
Herb Chong wrote:
the cost savings on a camera of that price is negligible.
Yeah. Much like the savings of putting a crippled K-mount on a $1500
camera, or whatever the original price of the *istD was...
they can offer it on a $300 body. leaving it off
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Aug 10, 2005, at 1:11 PM, Toralf Lund wrote:
Yes, but I could easily live without it, especially if it reduced
the price of the camera, or I could trade it in for something else,
like a full frame sensor (well that would not be a direct swap, I
guess) or
- Original Message -
From: John Graves
Subject: FA 50mm 1.4 Lens
Is the FA 50mm 1.4 gone or has production has been cut back. Everyone
seems to be OOS of the lens.
Dear John, Its gone.
William Robb
On 11/8/05, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
Assume shooting 1 roll a week on
average you're
talking about 5 years to make that money back. If you have to change
systems and get
all new lenses you are looking at a break even time that gets much
longer.Economics isn't
the reason to
On 11/8/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
What about if i'm still on dialup. Do i run the phone cable from the
ibook to this airport
base station and
that s it.No need to run from the base to the phone jack.
No, you run the phone cable to the Airport Base Station. That's it.
On 11/8/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
What about if i'm still on dialup. Do i run the phone cable from the
ibook to this airport
base station and
that s it.No need to run from the base to the phone jack.
If so that would free up my phone line correct.
If thats the case i
In a message dated 8/11/2005 9:31:11 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think Juan makes a very good point.
For myself, additionally, I don't *want* to learn the Canon control
interface. One of the things I like about the *istD is that its
SLR-camera controls are quite
On 11/8/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Uh. Been off list for a while. Busy. Back on now.
Where is this rumor (about a Canon D5) located? Found nothing about it on
dpreview.
Yeah, the Pentax interface is very nice, but Canon's isn't awful. Well, not
too awful. ;-)
TIA,
addendum:
If you're on broadband, you can be online (at breathtaking speeds) *AND*
your Mrs can be chatting away on the phone line *at the same time*. This
will sell it to her :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
Yup, thats what i'v conviced her we need. Hi
- Original Message -
From: E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One of the things I like about the *istD is that its
SLR-camera controls are quite similar to the PZ-1 and its
digital-specific controls are similar to the Optio -- easy for me to
learn, based on experience with Pentax
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 67 sighting
Now i just need tighter jeans(ohhh that s a scary thought.)
That is beyond scarey.
I'd rather see Baugher in a miniskirt.
Whoa, I think it's time you guys took this to private email...
--
Mark Roberts
On 11/8/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Now when we talk broadband, can you use that work in one breath ie:
include hi speed dial
up AND hi
speed cable, or is broad band something completly different.
(he ran away)
All broadband means (and I am no techie) is 'large bandwidth'
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/8/05, Juan Buhler, discombobulated, unleashed:
Uh, why would people using $800-$1200 DSLRs and people using film
cameras so naturally go for a $3000 DSLR?
Because they could save as much again on film, processing (and maybe even
printing) costs?
It's
On 11/8/05, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
Two wheels, one for aperture, one for shutter, a little button
thingy for taking the picture and a little ring-thingy around the lens for
focusing.
I like my little ring-thingy around my lens ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/8/05, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
Unlike Cotty, I'm not willing to
modify my lenses in such a way that they won't work normally.
My Pentax lenses all work normally :-)
Oh yeah? Let Frank use 'em, you'll see!
--
Mark Roberts
Photography
1 - 100 of 199 matches
Mail list logo
