On 8/14/05, Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think 'draconian' is the word you are after...
No, the word was precisely that: victorian, as in (and I copypaste) :
Relating to or displaying the standards or ideals of morality
regarded as characteristic of the time of Queen Victoria:
There seems to be a diffenrence between the right to photograph and the
right to publish photographs.
Normally publishing photographs of a minor requires a permission from the
parents.
In a democracy the judge/jury must consider balancing the rights of free
speach for the media/photographer
On 8/15/05, keithw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marco Alpert wrote:
http://www.alpert.com/marco/pdml/peso21.html
Comments welcomed.
-Marco
Geez! That camera (in front) is about the size of a 2 1/4 X 3 1/4 Crown
Graphic!
Looks like some kind of video camera to me.
Nice picture
On 14/8/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
I suspect the powers (or maybe just power) think(s) that someone,
somewhere mught be making something out of the cathedral and a cut
should come its way. Even if it's just the Margate pensioners annual
outing and old Freddie wanted a shot
On 14/8/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
I can only remember one incident when anyone made a comment. There's
a fountain in a square downtown that spurts up from ground level. In
summer, kids are often seen playing in the spray. I was photographing
a couple of children
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/08/15 Mon AM 07:36:01 GMT
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Photo Vest
On 14/8/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
I suspect the powers (or maybe just power) think(s) that someone,
somewhere mught be making
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/08/15 Mon AM 05:09:42 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Winder ME, anyone?
Books are the one thing, thats sells the most over the computer...
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
There's at least one thing
A very sensible post, Cotty.
One is reminded of the quote that War is the continuation of diplomacy by
other means. As we don't need reminding, the exercise of diplomacy by
conventional means is usually the best policy.
Of course, I am sure that Frank judged his busybody's possible
Hi all,
I have to amend myself. Those F1 pix were shot with the SMC Pentax F*
300/4.5, not with the Sigma.
http://www.dariobonazza.com/f1_04/02barrich.jpg
http://www.dariobonazza.com/f1_04/08montoya.jpg
http://www.dariobonazza.com/f1_04/09montoya.jpg
Cotty wrote:
On 14/8/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
I can only remember one incident when anyone made a comment.
There's a
fountain in a square downtown that spurts up from ground level. In
summer, kids are often seen playing in the spray. I was
photographing
a
On 15/8/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
I know the catherdal does have a very aggressive (in the best sense)
preservation policy. If too many people have been ignoring a ban on
flash, it's possible that the cathedral decided to give up any possible
income from photography except
On 15/8/05, Dario Bonazza, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/f1_04/09montoya.jpg
Nice shot Dario :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 15/8/05, Malcolm Smith, discombobulated, unleashed:
I have a couple of observations which may be if interest.
One is that, next time you might consider a slightly less
adversarial reply, even if the questioner is obviously
ignorant of the law.
Sometimes, a friendly and reassuring
Thanks Cotty, but nothing new there.
Cheers,
Dario (at work)
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 11:26 AM
Subject: Re: SV: Dreaming of a fast 70-210mm or 80-200mm AF zoom
On 15/8/05, Dario
Can't help Kevin. I've never heard of any places that hire Pentax 35mm
equipment, certainly not here in Perth.
I have a hard enough time getting my hands on Pentax mount lenses to
buy, let alone rent.
Dave
On 8/15/05, Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know of anywhere in
Cotty wrote:
[...]
When working, if I am filming in the street, I often get do-gooders
accosting me about whether I have this permission or that permission for
anything from filming a house, to filming people, to filming the sunset.
I always say yes (which is a lie). Just saves time.
If I
David Savage wrote:
On 8/15/05, keithw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marco Alpert wrote:
http://www.alpert.com/marco/pdml/peso21.html
Comments welcomed.
-Marco
Geez! That camera (in front) is about the size of a 2 1/4 X 3 1/4 Crown
Graphic!
Looks like some kind of video camera to
Hi all,
Wanting to know whether large viewfinders are really such a big deal, I
recently bought a MX plus associated goodies on ebay. The MX is in well
used condition and was descibed as leaking light. Having the thing in my
hands, I have every reason to believe that that's true...
I'd
Best foam, and best seller, I've found is this one:
http://tinyurl.com/8r96w
Excellent product, he has several sizes of kit,
most come with a bamboo tool and instructions.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Lucas Rijnders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 5:29 AM
To:
Anand DHUPKAR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In camera, to what extent 24 bit and 36 bit matter?
And in case it matters, by having real photo as an improvement
for color rendition, would it compensate the 24 bit color depth?
In other words, other cameras having 36 bit but 6megapixels and
this
This one time, at band camp, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't help Kevin. I've never heard of any places that hire Pentax 35mm
equipment, certainly not here in Perth.
I have a hard enough time getting my hands on Pentax mount lenses to
buy, let alone rent.
hmm, maybe a niche
This one time, at band camp, Malcolm Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's easier for me to take them very early in the morning, or make yourself
really really obvious - wear a hi-vi tabard - and no one will say a word!
I have little 3 day jobby soon where I am the official photographer for an
On 15/8/05, keithw, discombobulated, unleashed:
If I read you right, you do not recommend saying, Why do you want to
know? ;-)
That's the usual rejoinder for nosy people...
yes is a shorter word - wastes less breath ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
Any critique are welcom (as always)
http://mishka.site.co.il/gallery/albums/BrideContest/CRW_4495_4.jpg
Michael
- Original Message -
From: keithw
Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights
If I read you right, you do not recommend saying, Why do you want to
know? ;-)
That's the usual rejoinder for nosy people...
While I agree with your sentiment on this one, Keith (my response in the
past
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: Winder ME, anyone?
Books are the one thing, thats sells the most over the computer...
Pornography is the number one seller over the internet.
William Robb
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/08/15 Mon PM 01:38:36 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Winder ME, anyone?
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: Winder ME, anyone?
Books are the one thing, thats sells the most over the
I agree. For a web shot there is a lot of detail.
I'd also like to add that I love the title, very apt. What was the event Marco?
Dave
On 8/15/05, keithw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Savage wrote:
On 8/15/05, keithw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marco Alpert wrote:
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Jens Bladt Subject: RE: Winder
ME, anyone?
Books are the one thing, thats sells the most over the computer...
Pornography is the number one seller over the internet.
they don't sell pornography in books any more?
E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Jens Bladt Subject: RE: Winder
ME, anyone?
Books are the one thing, thats sells the most over the computer...
Pornography is the number one seller over the internet.
they don't sell pornography
while in London:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/31.htm
Comments and critique always appreciated.
enjoy
Godfrey
Cotty, you are a sick man...
Cotty wrote:
On 14/8/05, Markus Maurer, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hi Bill
I will buy gloves tomorrow and try your recommendation.
thanks!
Markus
Elbow length gloves work better. Get good quality rubber. Black's nice.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
Hi,
gloves plus a tiny drop of MoS2 (molybden disulphide) oil works
wonders. Put a drop of oil between filter threads and wait for about
10 minutes. After that most of filters separate freely and they do not
stuck again. I've used this technique for separating filters from lenses
and each
Pretty lady.
It's a nice and relaxed shot. She seems quite comfortable in front of
the camera. My only though is I would have liked to have seen all of
her left arm. Aside from that bit of nitpicking it's a very nice
picture.
Dave
On 8/15/05, Michael Spivak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any
Caption: He loves me, he loves me not.
Very nicely lit.
Jack
--- Michael Spivak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any critique are welcom (as always)
http://mishka.site.co.il/gallery/albums/BrideContest/CRW_4495_4.jpg
Michael
__
Do You Yahoo!?
In a message dated 8/11/2005 8:46:47 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The two bees where flying in the exact same position as Doppeldecker ;-)
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3624675
The second shot was made with the same setup, I love the green color of the
fly
In a message dated 8/11/2005 1:06:54 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
I just uploaded one of the images I shot with the *istDS. The picture was
shot at twilight, with the camera resting on the handrail of a balcony. The
image is of Huntington, West Virginia. I would
The first version is a bit washed out but the second is too dark. I'm
not sure about the sharpening
either has it's merits.
frank theriault wrote:
As a result of an off-list discussion, I modified this one that I
initially posted yesterday, in two ways:
First, on the original, I sharpened
It's an interesting image, but it just doesn't have a compelling
composition. It sort of tells a story
but not well enough. Sorry.
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Not quite a PAW shot, but I like the textures and the skew-ness of
everything in this photo. It seems a photo of a world where nothing
This is a nice composition and really very clever, it puts me in mind of
an old
NewYorker magazine cartoon, often re-worked of a big fish eating a
smaller fish eating a smaller fish eating a smaller ...
Marco Alpert wrote:
http://www.alpert.com/marco/pdml/peso21.html
Comments welcomed.
Which I think is amazing considering how much of it is available for free...
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Jens Bladt Subject: RE: Winder
ME, anyone?
Books are the one thing, thats sells the most over the computer...
Pornography is the number one seller over
Very,very nice, Michael.
I would prefere a litle less cropping off the right hand side as well as the
top. Tilting the flowers a little more in order to conciel herright arm more
would benefit the total impression. But this is really peanust. It's stll a
very pleasing photograph, not least du to
My only possible criticism is that this lovely model is at your place and
not mine! Beautiful.
Powell
http://mishka.site.co.il/gallery/albums/BrideContest/CRW_4495_4.jpg
Michael
What Paul said -- you need more detail in the shadow. If you can't do
Shadows/Highlights go for somewhere between the two versions.
Nice shot, frank!
Marnie aka Doe
In a message dated 8/14/2005 4:14:20 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Frank,
There's
In a message dated 8/15/2005 6:27:02 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any critique are welcom (as always)
http://mishka.site.co.il/gallery/albums/BrideContest/CRW_4495_4.jpg
Michael
==
Very, very nice. Very professional looking. Although, personally, I wish she
Normally it's not considered legal (considered consistent with normal,
democratic practice) to prevent or forbid photographing in places with
public access. Freedom of the press is basic in a democracy). So, I guess
this is a private or otherwise restricted event, without public access? Many
I second that, Cooty, John.
Remember, that even though you may photograph, you may not automtically be
allowed to publish the photographs as well.
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: John Forbes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 15. august
Cooty? Interesting...
Jens Bladt wrote:
I second that, Cooty, John.
Remember, that even though you may photograph, you may not automtically be
allowed to publish the photographs as well.
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: John Forbes
Thanks a lot for sharing this, Dario. Very informative. And l o a d s of
excellent shots.
What does YMMV mean?
Sorry to hear about you bad experience with Sigma, Carlos. As you can see,
not everybody agrees on this :-).
Regards
Jens
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
Jens Bladt
Since we're posting musician photos
today,
here's one I took on the
Fourth of July. Nothing wonderful about it, just thought it was funny.
http://www.alphoto.com/images/headless.jpg
oh, wait, here's a version for the grainy crowd:
I understand, Malcom.
When I was young, I was never shy or embarrased to just take any pictuers
I'd like.
Today I have become more considered, thinking about how people may feel.
Neverthelsss, photographing is still - and should be - allowed in public
places.
In Denmark a photographer
Thanks a lot for sharing this, Dario.
Very
informative. And l o a d s of
excellent shots.
What does YMMV mean?
Your mileage may vary.
Dario, these links are from the Sigma 70-210 f 2.8. If so its next on my istD
list.
Yes Carlos, sorry to hear
Soory!
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: P. J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 15. august 2005 19:02
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: The Photographer's Rights
Cooty? Interesting...
Jens Bladt wrote:
I second that,
Manuel,
Welcome! I hope you and the 200 are doing great.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Manuel Magalhães [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 11:12 PM
Subject: MZ-s Rubber caps
Hi All,
I have been reading you for quite a long time, learning
I got the FA28/2.8 from BH last Friday, and I'm already in love!
For some reason I didn't use the M28/3.5 too much in the istD.
Probably a combination of the need to shoot in manual mode, the half
stop less aperture, and the longer focus throw (I like shorter, even
though I focus manually,
Hi Frank,
As others, I'd prefer something midway through both of the images. The
sharp one almost looks artificial.
But in any case--I hadn't had the chance to see this the first time
you posted. It's fantastic! Excellent photo, and a great example of
color that works, somehow it feels like in
Thanks for the comment!
If I may make a comment:
There's nothing to be sorry about when offering a critique. I like
receiving any form of objective, honest criticism of a photo. :-)
I have been posting a picture or two every other day and seeing
people's reactions to them. Some of the
Jens Bladt wrote:
Thanks a lot for sharing this, Dario. Very informative. And l o a d s of
excellent shots.
Nothing that I hadn't already shown, but I thought it could be of some
interest on this topic.
Thanks Jens for liking those pictures, which is appreciated even if contents
are not
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: keithw
Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights
If I read you right, you do not recommend saying, Why do you want to
know? ;-)
That's the usual rejoinder for nosy people...
While I agree with your sentiment on this one, Keith (my
Dave Brooks wrote:
Dario, these links are from the Sigma 70-210 f 2.8. If so its next on my
istD list.
These are from the Sigma 70-210 f/2.8:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/bodym04e.htm
http://www.dariobonazza.com/gianna04e.htm
http://www.dariobonazza.com/climb04e.htm
It's good to hear that the FA28/2.8 does not disappoint. Your two
photos look excellent!
I agree with you about the focus speed ... since I bought the
FA20-35, I've not touched the A24/2.8 due to the AF lens' faster
focus even when manually operated.
Hmm. A comparison of the FA28/2.8 and
I was in Indianapolis this weekend, and a Buick collector's club was
having a show at the same hotel, so I wandered over Saturday evening
with a camera to investigate.
*istD with 43/1.9 attached.
Here's a little selection:
http://www.alphoto.com/images/buick007.jpg
At 05:11 AM 8/15/2005, Malcolm Smith wrote:
I have to say I agreed with Frank and would have said much the same thing. I
think it's the wrong approach however, but I am sick and tired of taking
photographs (where I am after the buildings and not the people anyway) and
comments are made.
Thanks to all for the comments.
This was shot with the Ds and the justifiably renowned 77mm Limited.
(I can only say that if anyone is struggling over splurging for one: Do
it. You will not regret it.)
- Marco
On Aug 15, 2005, at 3:05 AM, keithw wrote:
Did you notice the girl's hair?
Just a pretty flower picture, well sort of...
http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PESO_--_gms.html
Technical Info:
-
Pentax *ist-D @ 1/250 iso 400
vmc Vivitar Series 1 35-85mm f2.8 Varifocus @f5.6
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
On 8/15/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's good to hear that the FA28/2.8 does not disappoint. Your two
photos look excellent!
Thanks!
Hmm. A comparison of the FA28/2.8 and the FA35/2 against the FA20-35
at 28mm and 35mm focal lengths would be very interesting. Perhaps one
Nice shots. I think this kind of photography works better when the
automobile in question is a somewhat brighter color.
Doug Brewer wrote:
I was in Indianapolis this weekend, and a Buick collector's club was
having a show at the same hotel, so I wandered over Saturday evening
with a camera
I like her expression. Nice lighting. I would prefer a cooler white
balance tho, its a bit too warm for me.
rg
Michael Spivak wrote:
Any critique are welcom (as always)
http://mishka.site.co.il/gallery/albums/BrideContest/CRW_4495_4.jpg
Michael
Juan Buhler wrote:
I got the FA28/2.8 from BH last Friday, and I'm already in love!
For some reason I didn't use the M28/3.5 too much in the istD.
Probably a combination of the need to shoot in manual mode, the half
stop less aperture, and the longer focus throw (I like shorter, even
though I
Doug,
I like most well done abstracts, regardless of the subject, but among my
favorites are automotive abstracts. I especially like 013, its almost a pen
ink drawing. Anything special in post capture?
Nicely done, thanks for posting
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Doug
- Original Message -
From: keithw
Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights
In Canada, you don't even have the right to face your accuser.
I know that's part of our 'rights' but...I could never figure out who that
benefitted...
Other than to give you someone to vent your spleen
- Original Message -
From: E.R.N. Reed
Subject: Re: Winder ME, anyone?
they don't sell pornography in books any more?
Streaming video is the hot ticket now.
Books are so last century.
My ex computer builder is of the opinion that the entire reason the internet
is getting
- Original Message -
From: Glen
Subject: RE: The Photographer's Rights
What's a photographer to do? What are some good ways to handle the common
questions asked by such people, such as:
Why are you taking pictures?
It's a hobby.
Who are you working for? (This one always
My biggest confrontation of the sort was in the San Jose flea market,
a few months ago. I was with Rolling Red (you might remember her from
some brief posts here). At one point, out of nowhere, a woman came
yelling at her, demanding to know why she was taking pictures of her
kids. All she had done
On 8/15/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not your concern, they are, after all, my pictures.
This is Garry Winogrand's classic answer: (paraphrased)
Q: Why did you take my picture?
A: It's actually *my* picture, now.
j
--
Juan Buhler
http://www.jbuhler.com
photoblog at
Gentlemen (and Ladies, as I assume that there are a few of you out there as
well),
Greetings, it's been a long time. Nice to see a few familiar names out there
still kicking.
It's been a painful summer in some ways. Just bought a new house and things are
a little tight. Anyhow, I have decided
Get a great big important-looking id card printed which identifies you as a
Gentleman of Her Majesty's Press, and wear it round your neck!
--
Cheers,
Bob
While I agree with your sentiment on this one, Keith (my
response in the
past has been to send the nosy ones packing with a few well
I want to make a picture id with my name, photo, some official looking
stamps and signature, and that reads: The bearer is authorized to
photograph in this facility
Maybe I should sell those on ebay...
BTW, check out this blog:
http://photopermit.org/
It's about the right to photograph in
I think we should actually form a list of similar questions
and comments,
and take suggestions about how to best handle these common situations.
Unfortunately the answer depends too much on the specific situation and
person involved. For the same situation it could range from Why don't
This is Garry Winogrand's classic answer: (paraphrased)
Q: Why did you take my picture?
A: It's actually *my* picture, now.
Must remember that!
Bob
Streaming video is the hot ticket now.
Streaming, or spurting?
Books are so last century.
My ex computer builder is of the opinion that the entire
reason the internet
is getting faster at such a breakneck pace is to keep up with
the demand for
high end video pornography.
Ken,
Nothing special post. Shot RAW, converted to TIFF with IrfanView, duped
with PS, minimal amount of USM applied, resized and saved as JPEG.
Thanks for the comment.
Doug
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Doug,
I like most well done abstracts, regardless of the subject, but among my favorites
are
On 15/8/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Also, I usually restrict my sales to U.S. orders only (I really hate
filling out those customs forms), but if there is enough interest from
the non-U.S. members of this forum, I certainly would not want to exclude
people who have the good
On 15/8/05, Doug Brewer, discombobulated, unleashed:
I was in Indianapolis this weekend, and a Buick collector's club was
having a show at the same hotel, so I wandered over Saturday evening
with a camera to investigate.
*istD with 43/1.9 attached.
Here's a little selection:
Bill, great to hear from you!
There's no problem with posting For Sale items or links to your own eBay
auctions here.
Do you still have a web site? I'd been wondering what you were up to...
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
P. J. Alling wrote:
Nice shots. I think this kind of photography works better when the
automobile in question is a somewhat brighter color.
Funny you should mention this. I was released from the lock-up just this
morning, after being arrested trying to repaint all those cars in
brighter
On 15/8/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
while in London:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/31.htm
Comments and critique always appreciated.
I smell a hip-shot!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
I like it! Composition is well chosen.
Petals appear very soft. Your choice(?)
Jack
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a pretty flower picture, well sort of...
http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PESO_--_gms.html
Technical Info:
-
Pentax *ist-D @ 1/250 iso
Dave Brooks wrote:
Dario, these links are from the Sigma 70-210 f 2.8. If so its next on my
istD list.
These are from the Sigma 70-210 f/2.8:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/bodym04e.htm
http://www.dariobonazza.com/gianna04e.htm
On 15/8/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi,
discombobulated,
unleashed:
while in London:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/31.htm
Comments and critique always appreciated.
I smell a hip-shot!
Cheers,
Cotty
I smell Yellow Beard
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I also tend to be on my best behaviour in foreign countries.
William Robb
Bravo! Too many people aren't. Two of our closest friends fail miserably in
this respect; as a result we no longer travel with them.
Lewis
On 15/8/05, Michael Spivak, discombobulated, unleashed:
Any critique are welcom (as always)
http://mishka.site.co.il/gallery/albums/BrideContest/CRW_4495_4.jpg
Michael
Very nice. Personally I'd either like to see the top of her head, or go
for a closer crop. Also if you're going to see the
I would think one could photograph anything, so long as the rights of others
are not violated, therefore:
1.One should be able to photograph anything which is in normal view
from:
Your own property.
Public property.
Private property wherein you have permission to
Frank,
I prefer the original. Or actually, somewhere in between to be quite
honest. The improved version is overly sharpened and saturated,
leaving many of the details and tonal range messed up, IMO. Nice pic tho.
rg
frank theriault wrote:
As a result of an off-list discussion, I
Thanks Cotty, for the update on the state of the art or image of the
future.
Very interesting and entertaining. Now I really feel like a dinosaur :-/
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 13. august 2005
On 15/8/05, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
I second that, Cooty
I did get cooties once but it was only a short infection, and she was
pretty good looking anyway ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Will this be your next one, Cotty? I can always turn it off before the
stewing pot apears!
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 13. august 2005 18:01
Til: pentax list
Emne: Re: Digital Impact on New
2.You have a right to make money from any such
photograph, provided the
act does not violate a copyright. Some people's images and
some buildings are copywritten!
Copywritten?
A photograph is not a copy of either a building or a person, consequently a
photograph of a building or a
I seems to me that you were the victim of assault. You were doing
nothing wrong but were threatened by a complete stranger. I would have
asked the police to arrest the woman so that I could press charges.
Juan Buhler wrote:
My biggest confrontation of the sort was in the San Jose flea
There you go, Cotty:
http://tinyurl.com/b2sfq
Any bids, please?
...
And the winning bidder is
http://tinyurl.com/7hmu6
Cheers
Jens
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 15. august 2005 22:30
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: RE: Digital Impact
1 - 100 of 193 matches
Mail list logo
