I don't see that any spots are blown out, but a small adjustment in the
highlights on the fender tops using the shadows/highlights Adjustment might
help.
Maris
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Shel,
It looks pretty good. This is a tricky subject that has a wide range
from black to white - looks like you
On 17/9/05, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/reportage/images/pic40.html
Very colourful, and I like the framing. My only problem with it is it
makes me a bit queasy dizzy. g
Very nice.
Thanks Dave.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
On 16/9/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
On the way to a friend's house early this evening this bright yellow jewel
stopped me in my tracks.
http://home.earthlink.net/~sbelinkoff/lotus.html
Tech Details: istDS, A50/2.0 glass @ F4.5, 200 ISO ...
Most interested in comments on
On Sep 17, 2005, at 1:52 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Hasn't happened to me. I still have CS installed too. I do always
save files before switching to another account, but I tend to
switch accounts relatively rarely. What version of Mac OS X are you
using?
10.4.2
I switch accounts often
Forgive me for putting a damper on this. I have an inherent dislike of
panning and scanning still photos. If I watch a documentary, and the
director has decided that he will have any still photos shot so the
camera moves around and pics out detail, it puts me off. Especially when
there isn't even
I can't remember where I found it, but you can download it from here:
http://tinyurl.com/78lx2
http://fonts.goldenweb.it/pan_file/l/it/font2/Dijkstra.ttf/d2/True_Type_Font
s/c/d/default.html
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I
Hi,
I'd generally agree with you, however, in this case I was a bit more
interested in depicting something graphic than in photographing a car -
don't know how well that came across to you, but it works for me. Also,
stepping back a bit to show a little more wing would have also shown some
I see what Bruce is referring to, although the areas don't appear blown out
on my screen, which is not properly calibrated at this point. I was
working on this one with in a room with less than favorable light, and now
that the room is more like normal, I can see where a little highlight
Thanks, Maris ... the conversion from RAW is what I meant.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Maris V. Lidaka Sr
What do you mean by how the conversion looks?
http://home.earthlink.net/~sbelinkoff/lotus.html
I did, Dario, and reported it to the list in July.
Here is a part of my message then, responding to
comments about the new Optio 60:
The Optio 50 seems also interesting, 5Mp,
rechargeable
batteries, optical viewfinder, ...and very cheap.
But, from what I have read, the camera is a very poor
Hi Bruce,
There don't seem to be any completely blown areas on my screen, but I think
I'll go back and actually measure the areas that might be questionable.
Maris made a point about toning down some of the highlights, and that may
help a bit, too. There looks to be quite a lot of room for
On 17/9/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
I was a bit more
interested in depicting something graphic than in photographing a car
I understand, and in that context it works perfectly.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Is it at least as good as the M version? Solid feeling? Comments
appreciated. Tks!
Shel
Hi Shel, glad to hear the new DSLR is OK.
The A50/1.7 is very little like the M version.
More plastic, which is mostly evident in the feel
of the aperture ring.
Focus feel is OK and image quality is very good.
On the D where you adjust aperture from the body
it's a very pleasant lens to use.
If
Is it at least as good as the M version? Solid feeling? Comments
appreciated. Tks!
No. The A 50's are not quite as nice to focus as are the M's (in my
opinion). Plus, the A 50/1.7 specifically seems to have a weakness in the
aperture ring design, where the plastic aperture ring sometimes
David Savage offered the following advice:
Try going to View - Current View - Group Messages by Conversation. I
have Outlook Express 6, and by doing this it sorts the messages by
thread.
That worked. Thanks for the tip.
Tom Reese
Without having a chance to play with it, I'd say the conversion is
pretty darn close. The brightest highlights have tonal value, so
they're not clipped. I might have tried to increase the brightness a
little bit to bring ore life to the darker parts of the car in the
center foreground. But as
representing those some who like it -- been using one as a main lens
for over 5 years, and imo, it's quite well built. very smooth, very solid
(of course, not quite as solid as a super-tak). no problems whatsoever.
very sharp. i would recommend it without any reservations.
mishka
On 9/17/05,
Well,
At least in my mind it is. I couldn't resist (this time) the
opportunity to purchase an almost new FA 80-200 f2.8 zoom for my
*istDS. I'm eagerly awaiting delivery in the next several days. It
wasn't really in my plan, I'd been eyeing the shorter 28-70 f2.8 but
figured that one might be
Hi Jay, that's a very nice shot, and dog.
I have the F80-200/4.7-5.6, it's one of my favorite
walk-around lenses.
Very light, and the internal zoom is a feature I wish
ALL of my lenses had.
The best way to find an F1.7x is to check eekBay and
KEH at least several time a day.
They show up fairly
Cotty wrote:
IFAIR the endoscope is currently the main source of income for Pentax.
If it's not #1, it's certainly right up there...
I don't think Pentax appreciates being made the butt of a joke like
that...
Yes. Enough of the wisecracks.
Sadly, I doubt we've reached the end of them
-Original Message-
From: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 8:47 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: SV: For the Collector who needs one of everything.
Cotty wrote:
IFAIR the endoscope is currently the main source of income
for
Nice work, Shel! And my favorite color too. :-)
Godfrey
On the way to a friend's house early this evening this bright yellow
jewel stopped me in my tracks.
http://home.earthlink.net/~sbelinkoff/lotus.html
Malcolm Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/The-Ultimate-HippieVacation_W0QQitemZ5614695213
Bid now!
Ordinarily, I get quite peeved at people who use the word ultimate
without knowing what it means, namely last or final. (There's a
place near me that proclaims itself the ultimate
On the way to a friend's house early this evening this bright yellow jewel
stopped me in my tracks.
http://home.earthlink.net/~sbelinkoff/lotus.html
Tech Details: istDS, A50/2.0 glass @ F4.5, 200 ISO ...
Most interested in comments on how the conversion looks.
Talk about grinning one's
On Sep 17, 2005, at 5:03 AM, Fred wrote:
Is it at least as good as the M version? Solid feeling? Comments
appreciated. Tks!
No. The A 50's are not quite as nice to focus as are the M's (in my
opinion). Plus, the A 50/1.7 specifically seems to have a weakness
in the
aperture ring
Since Shel's started a theme for new digital owners, I figured I'd
contribute this. It was across the street from the store I bought my D
at, and is one of the first shots I took. Lens is an old Formula 5 28mm
f2.8 with a Circular Polarizer, at f2.8
A bit dark, did it on a Mac? If I increase my screen brightness to about
1.8 gamma it looks good.
Anybody interested in hearing what Martin Evening, author of Adobe
Photoshop CS2 for Photographers has to say about 1.8 gamma grin.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
On the way to a friend's house early
Shel uses a PC. On my Mac Cinema Display, running at 1.8, it looks a
little dark in the shaded yellow areas.
Paul
On Sep 17, 2005, at 10:30 AM, graywolf wrote:
A bit dark, did it on a Mac? If I increase my screen brightness to
about 1.8 gamma it looks good.
Anybody interested in hearing what
On second thought maybe it looks about like how PS RAW likes to make it,
I find that if I use auto for exposure it makes the image too dark for
my taste. Maybe a bit of a midtone adjustment? As there is detail in
both the highlights and shadows. Of course, since you say you monitor is
not
Anybody else notice that the folks who find this kind of thing funny are
all bottom feeders, err... I mean bottom posters? They also clip
attributions muttered under breath.
GRIN
--graywolf
mike wilson wrote:
Cotty wrote:
IFAIR the endoscope is currently the main source of income for
Thanks for the definitions, it was beginning to drive me batty.
-Adam
cbwaters wrote:
What a beautiful car. Sad to see it penned-up.
Peso - Picture every so often
Geso- Galley E.S.O.
CW
- Original Message - From: Adam Maas
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, September
In a message dated 9/17/2005 7:13:33 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://cgi.ebay.com/The-Ultimate-HippieVacation_W0QQitemZ5614695213
Bid now!
Malcolm
==
Not as good as the wedding dress, because this looks more staged. But cute.
Marnie aka Doe
Ahh ... good point. No need to be too concerned about the aperture ring
when used inthe DS, which is why I was looking into the lens in the first
place. Might be cheap enuf to pick one up to replace the A 50/2.0, which
is only a so-so performer.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey
Hi Fred,
I was thinking of it for use in the DS, and as there are a number of other
50's here at Casa Belinkoff, this would be an addition to the group, not
replacing any other lenses. I've been happy with the performance of the
M50/1.7 - especially like its smaller size/weight compared to the
Hi Don,
Glad to see you here this morning. As noted elsewhere, I was thinking of
it as a decent performing lens for the DS. Prices seem to be pretty
reasonable, and since there are plenty of other 50mm optics here, the A 1.7
now seems like a good addition, esp for DS use. Perhaps at some point
In a message dated 9/16/2005 9:39:42 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Teenager in Training.
http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PESO_--_teintr.html
Technical Info:
Pentax *ist-D ISO 400 @ 1/125sec (Built in Flash)
smc Pentax 28-200mm f3.8~5.6AL[IF] @ 200mm f5.6
==
Re:
http://home.earthlink.net/~sbelinkoff/lotus.html
Shel, maybe -0.5 EV. That would help the highights and still keep the
yellow saturation.
Joe
On Sep 17, 2005, at 1:31 AM, David Mann wrote:
Hasn't happened to me. I still have CS installed too. I do always
save files before switching to another account, but I tend to
switch accounts relatively rarely. What version of Mac OS X are
you using?
10.4.2
I switch accounts often
This is the main meaning of the word for me:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_%28sport%29
and, just so this is not completely OT:
http://flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/1875165/
(istD, taken by a friend, I'm the one in the pic)
:)
j
On 9/17/05, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool tip Godfrey. Thanks for posting it.
Dave
On 9/18/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Photoshop Tip of the day:
The proper tonal curve (and color tone) for a photo will change
depending upon the matte you want to place around it, as seen in this
example I did with Boris
I had the good fortune to spend 3-1/2 days there about a year ago. I
love the city.
What to see depends on their interests. Unfortunately, with only one
day, there are really two cities to see, Buda and Pest, split by the Danube.
Are they interested in photography?
If they get a really
Cotty,
I agree with you in overall sentiment.
The John Burns effect is useful when used sparingly, can be very
effective as a transition between themes in an orchestrated
presentation or when using it to make a particular statement. Overuse
of any effects is tiresome and becomes cliché
Even if time is tight, given the weather these days (I'm in Vienna
now, I suppose it is not too different in Budapest) a great thing to
do is to spend a few hours in the baths. I recommend the Szechenyi
baths, they seem to be the ones frequented by locals.
j
On 9/16/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL
Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cotty,
I agree with you in overall sentiment.
The John Burns effect is useful when used sparingly, can be very
effective as a transition between themes in an orchestrated
presentation or when using it to make a particular statement. Overuse
of any
This is not my kind of picture, as I don't think my photos usually
work when the subjects are looking at me. But given all my attempts to
shoot these guys in a way that resembled a certain picture by Doisneau
failed. So:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jbuhler/44044849/
(istD, FA35/2, a couple of
Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Moreover, I think Cotty is looking at this application
...in a way...
that, frankly, never occurred to me. He's a professional videographer,
so he naturally sees this as a limited version or real video. I see it
as an enhanced version of a photo slide
Hello,
I was in the north of Poland yesterday. I was going to stay in Poland
a bit longer, but since I wasn't shooting pictures that I liked too
much, I decided to start heading back to Spain (from where my flight
back to USA will leave on 1/10) a bit earlier.
I will be in Venezia tomorrow, and
I really like it, cool shot!
My answer is ot too, since I shoot Fuji pixels
Regards
Albano
--- Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OT because it's not Pentax.
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/reportage/images/pic40.html
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
5-shot stitched pano taken from the top of the tower in the crumbling
ruin of Montrichard Chateau on the river Cher. They let you ascend the
tower only if you agree to do so at your own risk. We all had a go :)
I did this shot hand-held, because I didn't have a tripod with me
(traveling by
Hi Juan ...
Nope, it's not your style, and it clearly shows. It's not a bad pic, but
there's something off about it. The moment wasn't quite caught, there's
a bit too much tension in the faces and postures of the subjects, not
relaxed enough, not quite natural or capturing the who of the
Hi Juan,
That's a great suggestion, although it's probably not for my friends ;-))
I'll forward it to them anyway. Maybe they'll surprise me - and themselves
LOL
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Juan Buhler
Even if time is tight, given the weather these days (I'm in Vienna
now, I suppose
Thanks for the comments Shel!
I agree. Not my kind of pic, and not a kind i care to venture into
anytime soon... They posed as I was trying to take a candid shot, and
it turned out that that image was the best one. In any case, not too
good, and not making my photoblog...
Cheers,
j
On 9/17/05,
If I can intrude. I'm actually a pretty big fan of Ken Burns, mostly
because I am also a huge history buff and I think his historical
documentaries are of high quality. I somewhat understand the integrity of
the original and shame on derivative works argument, but most of his source
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Is it at least as good as the M version? Solid feeling? Comments
appreciated. Tks!
I'd say that it feels a bit more plasticy than the M-50. Also, as I
think someone mentioned might happen: On mine the aperture ring has
started causing some trouble; it sometimes
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 1:03 PM
Subject: Another France photo
5-shot stitched pano taken from the top of the tower in the crumbling
ruin of Montrichard Chateau on the river Cher.
As
OK, to make up for the earlier one, this one is more like what I shoot:
http://photoblog.jbuhler.com/index.php?showimage=240
(istD, FA35/2, 1/10s handheld to blur the people, will probably work
much better when printed big)
Sad story: that gentleman spent a while (maybe 30' or so) waiting in
- Original Message -
From: Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 1:32 PM
Subject: PESO: Vienna, 2005
OK, to make up for the earlier one, this one is more like what I shoot:
http://photoblog.jbuhler.com/index.php?showimage=240
Very nice Juan. I love the dynamic static elements of this shot.
Dave
On 9/18/05, Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, to make up for the earlier one, this one is more like what I shoot:
http://photoblog.jbuhler.com/index.php?showimage=240
(istD, FA35/2, 1/10s handheld to blur the
There seems to be a HUGE number of digital camera brands and thousands, if
not billions LOL of models. I don't recall there ever being so many film
camera brands and models. Is my memory failing?
I think you can say that the digital camera market is still quite young.
Seems to me that
Hi!
OK, to make up for the earlier one, this one is more like what I shoot:
http://photoblog.jbuhler.com/index.php?showimage=240
(istD, FA35/2, 1/10s handheld to blur the people, will probably work
much better when printed big)
Sad story: that gentleman spent a while (maybe 30' or so)
Hi!
Warning: Even at low JPEG quality setting, I could only get this one
down to about 180 meg.
Mark, you mean 180 Kb, don't you?
Boris
Hi!
5-shot stitched pano taken from the top of the tower in the crumbling
ruin of Montrichard Chateau on the river Cher. They let you ascend the
tower only if you agree to do so at your own risk. We all had a go :)
I did this shot hand-held, because I didn't have a tripod with me
(traveling by
Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Warning: Even at low JPEG quality setting, I could only get this one
down to about 180 meg.
Mark, you mean 180 Kb, don't you?
Well, yeah, but what's a factor of 1000 amongst friends?
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Is the Pentax Lens Gallery at http://phred.org/pentax/lensgal/
a dead project or is there still a way to contribute?
I see it was once maintained by Valetin Donisa but all links
to his pages no longer work.
This is the sort of site that I like because it shows actual
photo results for the
My first PESO...
Two pictures at once, shot with different lenses.
http://users.pandora.be/vicmortelmans/fts/050900_Toon/
http://users.pandora.be/vicmortelmans/fts/050900_Toon1/
I selected this ones because composition, light and focus appear very
nice. I must admit these pictures are
Malcolm Smith wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/The-Ultimate-HippieVacation_W0QQitemZ5614695213
Bid now!
Nh. Looks like Frank is high bidder and I wouldn't want to spoil it
for him. Bunny ears should go well with the dish and foil helmet.
mike
I really like the first one Vic. He's a happy looking youngster.
I thinks it's more likely that it's the different light quality,
rather than the lens (although it is possible it's having some
affect).
BTW, both of those shots are very pixelated, try lowering the
compression settings.
Dave S
I love pix from European church towers! The towns are
often so beautifully situated, and so attractive from
above, that they're a real treat photographically.
Love the distortion in this one, too.
Just finished sorting my 28 rolls from June; gotta get
some of them scanned and posted already!
graywolf wrote:
Anybody else notice that the folks who find this kind of thing funny are
all bottom feeders, err... I mean bottom posters? They also clip
attributions muttered under breath.
GRIN
--graywolf
mike wilson wrote:
Cotty wrote:
IFAIR the endoscope is currently the main source
Mark,
Opened rather quickly for 180 meg. LOL
IMO, extremely well done. I say this even though I'm
clueless as to the PS expertise required.
No way would I even detect the distortion.
Beautiful upload.
Jack
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5-shot stitched pano taken from the top of
Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
Opened rather quickly for 180 meg. LOL
It's this new super-secret compression algorithm I've invented. Makes
180 meg open up as fast as 180k!
IMO, extremely well done. I say this even though I'm
clueless as to the PS expertise required.
Arcsoft Panorama
That's a impressive pano for hand held. Whenever I try it the end
result is all over the place.
Pretty town. Very nice.
Dave
On 9/18/05, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5-shot stitched pano taken from the top of the tower in the crumbling
ruin of Montrichard Chateau on the river Cher.
On Sep 17, 2005, at 10:28 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
Some people claim that the A version is slightly better than the M
optically, though. I haven't made any serious attempts at a real
comparison myself...
My understanding was that the 50/1.7 is the same, optically, through
M-A-F-FA
Like num one. Nothing wrong about being creative ;-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not very long ago, someone posted a very nice shot (brown/yellow leaves)
made with this lens. About the same time someone posted a messaage saying a
lens like this was auctioned for a rather large price. I guess we were
making jokes about the unfortunate buyer.
What is it with this lens? Is it
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
My understanding was that the 50/1.7 is the same, optically, through
M-A-F-FA versions.
The coatings may be different between M and A. I have no hard facts,
just a suspicion I have read it in the PDML grapevine.
Kostas
On Sep 17, 2005, at 11:01 AM, Don Sanderson wrote:
... This is the sort of site that I like because it shows actual
photo results for the different lenses rather than cold
numbers or res charts. ...
The biggest problem with these kinds of efforts is that the image
quality you see on your
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, Bob W wrote:
I can't remember where I found it, but you can download it from here:
http://tinyurl.com/78lx2
Many thanks. Very nice.
Kostas
On Sep 17, 2005, at 10:03 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/montrichard.jpg
Very nice job.
Godfrey
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, mike wilson wrote:
Cotty wrote:
IFAIR the endoscope is currently the main source of income for
Pentax.
If it's not #1, it's certainly right up there...
I don't think Pentax appreciates being made the butt of a joke like
that...
Yes. Enough of the wisecracks.
All things considered, you did a very neat and nice job. I like the pano!
Maris
Mark Roberts wrote:
5-shot stitched pano taken from the top of the tower in the crumbling
ruin of Montrichard Chateau on the river Cher. They let you ascend the
tower only if you agree to do so at your own risk.
Last night saw another gallery crawl in Birmingham, Michigan. The
gallery that has been showing some of my work was on the tour, so they
asked me to come in and do some meet and greet. A jazz band parked out
in front, and we had a good turnout. Lots of fun. I posted some pics
for the owners,
Nice shot, Mark. I love the way the light plays off the roofs of the
houses in the foreground. Well composed.
Paul
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5-shot stitched pano taken from the top of the tower
in the crumbling
ruin of Montrichard Chateau on the river Cher. They
let you
Vic,
You can send a bit bigger picture.
This one suffers from the pixelation on the curves of your son's head.
Regards, Bob S.
On 9/17/05, Vic Mortelmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My first PESO...
Two pictures at once, shot with different lenses.
Hi Juan,
Your travel diary with pictures deserves to be shown widely.
This picture, in my opinion, is not below of some I saw in Magnum or in some
books of HCB. It is a strong image that tells a whole story in a first, in a
second and even in a third look.
Thanks for shering wiht us,
Manuel
Gorgeous picture, Mark.
John
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 21:13:58 +0100, Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice shot, Mark. I love the way the light plays off the roofs of the
houses in the foreground. Well composed.
Paul
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5-shot stitched
This is so anal
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SV: For the Collector who needs one of everything.
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005
Both cute shots!
They come across as visibly pixelized. Try larger file size or less
compression.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Vic Mortelmans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: son in backyard
My first PESO...
Two pictures at once, shot with different lenses.
Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Hi Juan!
I will be in Venezia tomorrow, and then will visit a few
places in
Italy, most probably around Toscana, for the next week or so.
Any PDMLers in the north of Italy want to get together for a
few
birras? (I know it's a big country, but
Lovely geometry to the shot Glen.
Love the motled colour.
Good job.
Dave
Medium Size Version:
http://webpages.charter.net/glenweb/gallery/Stone_Legs_04.jpg
Larger Version:
http://webpages.charter.net/glenweb/gallery/Stone_Legs_04b.jpg
I'm interested
Thanks to everyone for the comments on the France photo (even the people
who made fun of me for getting the file size wrong).
I've now got a web page up with more photos from the trip.
Two warnings:
There's 108 of them :)
This is really more of a what I did on my vacation page than any kind
of
I don't think I've had a PAW for several weeks. Sorry, this is almost
a week late. I wanted to post this on 9/11, but I couldn't get to my
lab last weekend, and (as I've mentioned here before) with my new job,
I can't get there weekdays.
Taken in New York City:
On 17/9/05, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
5-shot stitched pano taken from the top of the tower in the crumbling
ruin of Montrichard Chateau on the river Cher. They let you ascend the
tower only if you agree to do so at your own risk. We all had a go :)
I did this shot hand-held,
Thanks, Dave.
You're a man with impeccable taste. Apparently, there aren't many who can
properly appreciate such a fine photograph. ;)
take care,
Glen
At 02:39 PM 9/17/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lovely geometry to the shot Glen.
Love the motled colour.
Good job.
Dave
Nice shot. I like the way you've included some environment. Nicely
composed. I also like the edges of the negative.
On Sep 17, 2005, at 7:05 PM, frank theriault wrote:
I don't think I've had a PAW for several weeks. Sorry, this is almost
a week late. I wanted to post this on 9/11, but I
On 17/9/05, Albano Garcia, discombobulated, unleashed:
I really like it, cool shot!
My answer is ot too, since I shoot Fuji pixels
Gracias Albano :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Joseph Tainter wrote:
Pest: St. Stephen's Cathedral has one of the most magnificent interiors
I have seen anywhere. Here's a pic:
http://pug.komkon.org/05may/stefndom.html
I was in Budapest in 2002 when they were restoring the cathedral. it
looks like they did a wonderful job, but at the
On 9/16/05, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Teenager in Training.
http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PESO_--_teintr.html
Technical Info:
Love the nice tight framing! Great smile, the positioning of the
fingers on the phone and the one pressing against her face is
exquisite! The
On 17/9/05, Juan Buhler, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://photoblog.jbuhler.com/index.php?showimage=240
(istD, FA35/2, 1/10s handheld to blur the people, will probably work
much better when printed big)
Excellent work as usual. Well done.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
