I've got the 7660. I'm fond of the Moab Entrada papers with it, but be
aware that you will get fading on any paper not designed for dye inks.
I've yet to get successful prints from the Epson Enhanced Matte or
Heavyweight Matte papers, the problem I'm having is the heads scrape the
papers at
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Camera engineering (This is signifigant)
ARE YOU RETARDED are ARE YOU JUST PLAYING DUMB?
I'm just seeing how retarded I can make you look, John.
I do it because I am a no good lout who likes to make fun of stupid people,
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Camera engineering (This is signifigant)
I told you this would happen didn't I???
Sure John, whatever.
William Robb
NICE COMEBACK - too bad it doesnt
address the subject matter - BTW, if you think you are making
me look retarded, then why are YOU the one trying
run from the postions you took on the
subject matter with a barage of personal
attacks and NO SUBJECT MATTER REBUTALS WHATSOVER??
That's called a
guess it's time for an Epson 2200 (2400?) or 4000 series printer. If I
can't get the bugger rolling smoothly again, I'll go for it (probably a
2200-2400) and would like to hear recommendations on papers that you've
used with it too.
The only paper I ever use these days is Epson Premium
Subject: Re: Camera engineering (was Re: Rename request)
On 21/9/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Rather that rereading the old thread, I will just wait until it comes
around
again.
Cotty Wrote...
In fact why don't we book it in now, so those that don't want to see it
again can
Since the current sensors are smaller than 24 x 36 mm, could a camera be
built in such a way that it could shift the sensor up and down, and from
side to side? This would have a similar use as a shift lens would have. Of
course, you would have to use lenses made to cover the full 24 x 36
Patents are often used for trade, as long as you contribute to the common
patent pool you are allowed used some of the others. If you have an important
patent in the competitors field you can get what you want from him. That is an
important part of the technology and patent game, and that's
On Sep 20, 2005, at 11:16 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I played around with the feature some more, and golly gee whiz, the
camera
finally will chose different ISO settings, although I've yet to
figure out
what it uses to make the decision.
I set the DS to ISO Coercion at 1600 limit, set the
oops, I should have checked the address I was replying to.
- Dave
On Sep 22, 2005, at 9:13 AM, Cotty wrote:
Avast me hearties!!
Sorry Cotty, you're a couple of days late. Talk like a pirate day
was the 19th.
http://www.talklikeapirate.com/piratehome.html
Cheers,
- Dave
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Cotty wrote:
On 21/9/05, Mark Erickson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Power Zoom, of
course!
Waste of time!!
And additonal weight.
Kostas
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, P. J. Alling wrote:
There's a lot of light fall off in most ultra wide angle lenses. The sensor
will be adding under exposure effects when that happens as well.
Wouldn't the crop factor be in one's favour though in this case?
Kostas
Congrats, Pål!
I can't recall when I first joined, but I remember one post from the early days
where you described having your LX breaking down while photographing an airshow
or similar. Something about it not working on manually selected shutter speeds,
only on auto. Do you remember when that
On Sep 22, 2005, at 7:13 AM, Bob W wrote:
Similarly, there's to be no discussion of Monty Python if you
didn't watch every episode when it was first broadcast in the 1960s
No fair... I wasn't born until the 70s. I do have the 14-disc DVD
set though.
nothing about single malts unless
Quoting Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Happy anniversary, everyone...
Boris (a.k.a. Jar Jar a.k.a. The Youngster)
You'll be okay as long as you keep your tongue out of the light arch.
Sorry, mate... just couldn't resist...:-)
Cheers,
Jostein
Thanks to all who commented. A few of the posted pics provided something
of a sense of how the lens performs.
Shel
Hi Dag,
Thanks for posting the links and for your comments. Do you have a larger
version of this one?
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=115486
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is OK. I use it a lot. I see some light falloff still visible wide
open
Another PAW up for viewing:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/38.htm
Comments, critique, flames always appreciated. Flames are ignored. ;-)
enjoy
Godfrey
I came along in December 1996, so I'm a newbie ;-).
Antti-Pekka
Antti-Pekka Virjonen
Estera Oy Turku
www.estera.fi
www.computec.fi
-Original Message-
From: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 11:56 AM
To:
Don Sanderson wrote:
OK Folks, how vote you, Yea or Nay
Aye!
- T
Thursday, September 22, 2005, 4:33:48 AM, Mark wrote:
MR P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even K and M lenses could be made to work with in camera IS.
MR I suppose, if there were some means of manually entering the lens' focal
MR length into the camera. Sounds even more cumbersome than
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Don Sanderson wrote:
Still getting pretty good prices for nice MZ-S's on eekBay.
Absolutely. Whether I buy one from the EU or from the US (and pay
taxes) the price is almost fixed at 400 GBP.
Kostas
JK According to the lens barrel DOF markings, everything between 3 feet
JK and infinity should be in focus at f5.6. The DOF at 15mm is
Don't count on DOF markings. They are useless because they are
computed for 3-4x linear enlargement _only_. Imagine how small a print
would that be from the
To my surprise and amazement, I discovered that Pentax has a Limited
version of their 5.5x loupe. A perfect compliment to the Limited lenses?
LOL
http://shop.pentax.jp/defaultMall/images/goods/60054.jpg
Shel
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Don Sanderson wrote:
As for Pentax, wonderful, but not for a pro who puts food on the table
with their gear.
IMHO of course.
Don (Feeling like a traitor, but honest.)
Probably you are more forgetful than a traitor. Forgetful of folk like
Steady, who puts food on the
After admiring the awesome photoblog of Juan (Water Molotov) and great
images from Godfrey, I have been wanting to explore different BW
conversion processes in Photoshop CS. This one involves dual
Hue/Saturation adjustment layers. Not even close to dynamic range shown
in Juan's work, but here
On Sep 22, 2005, at 6:42 PM, John Celio wrote:
The only paper I ever use these days is Epson Premium Lustre. It
is by far the best paper I've ever used. I use it in both the
Epson 9600 and 2200 printers at work.
I've heard a lot of good things said about that paper. I'd try if it
were
On Sep 22, 2005, at 5:04 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
So, what ppi do you use for what size/type prints? If all I can
get are
small prints using the recommended ppi from the digi, well, that's an
unhappy circumstance. But it seems that many of you are getting
larger
than 6x9 prints from the
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Jim King wrote:
Here are two shots (full size) of the proverbial brick wall, one at f5.6 (one
stop down to give the lens a little slack) and one at f11. The one at f5.6
is terrible in the corners, while the one at f11 is a lot better. Do you
think the one at f5.6 is
Yes, I recall that Rob had a somewhat negative comment about the lens,
which is what prompted the question. Thanks for the remainder about WW's
comment as well.
I'm looking to replace the K20/4.0, which replaced the infamous Bow Wow
Super Tak 20/4.5, both of which provided satisfactory, if not
1. Ultra compact magnesium weather sealed body.
2. Ultra compact weather sealed lenses made of magnesium (and glass of course!)
too.
3. Lots of megapixels giving image quality better than whats achieveable with
film (which ever way you measure)
4. Possible to switch from manual mode to aperture
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/09/21 Wed PM 11:12:30 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Irrelevant Poll: What do you WANT in a digital camera?
On Sep 21, 2005, at 4:06 PM, Scott Loveless wrote:
I tried a 77 ltd and
really liked the feel and build
I'd want a digital sensor sitting in a manual, mechanical body. I
don't need an LCD screen behind. Just give me the usual knobs on top
of the body to control ISO, shutter speed (need not be stepless), and
the ring around lenses to control aperture. Manual focus lenses work
fine for me as well. The
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/09/22 Thu AM 04:03:47 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PDML 10th anniversary
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton
Subject: Re: PDML 10th anniversary
Geez, I'm trying to remember when I joined - best guess
that's usually a sign of wearing heads. have you tried looking for an Epson
maintenance cartridge? it has cleaning solution inside instead of ink. might
be pricy.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PDML
one of the things that Wilhelm has found is that 3rd party papers generally
provide significantly less fade resistance than the vendor's own papers.
this has been my limited experience too.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Pretty. I'm sure they're the first of many to come. I look forward to
seeing more.
Paul
On Sep 22, 2005, at 12:27 AM, John Graves wrote:
I think I like my ist-DS. Here are the first of my new pictures
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=529887
Comments please.
John G.
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1. Ultra compact magnesium weather sealed body.
Actually, this is quite important to me as I had had both the MZ-S and the
645NII at repair due to seawater seeping in to the body. The selector around
the release button on the
Ho-Ho. This thread is getting incredibly funny!
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 7:52 AM
Subject: RE: Camera engineering (This is signifigant)
ARE YOU RETARDED are ARE YOU JUST PLAYING DUMB?
- Original Message -
I can't recall when I first joined, but I remember one post from the early
days
where you described having your LX breaking down while photographing an
airshow
or similar. Something about it not working on manually selected shutter
speeds,
only on auto. Do
a Pentax body that can't focus on a moving object while a Canon or Nikon
body can is solely technology.
having worked for 10 years in industrial research generating patents, i am
quite familiar with what patents can be used for. i see no evidence that
Pentax got any of those uses.
Herb.
- Original Message -
From: Chan Yong Wei
I'd want a digital sensor sitting in a manual, mechanical body.
Whats the point with that? It won't work without batteries anyway.
Pål
I was going to ask about Casselbury just the other day. Haven't heard
from him in a long time. Miss his Photography of the Oregon Coast.
Paul
On Sep 22, 2005, at 12:03 AM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Bruce Dayton
Subject: Re: PDML 10th anniversary
Geez, I'm
I like IPhoto slide shows. They're easy to make and with music, they
can be a hoot.
Paul
On Sep 22, 2005, at 12:16 AM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Update on my profile snags
However i order the ibook before this discovery.
Its not
Besides, the 24/2 is out of stock at BHPhoto. Again. Adorama doesn't
even list it. What's this available thing Herb is talking about?
BH will get more. I suggest that you click on the notify when in stock
button and enter your e-mail address. They'll let you know when it comes in.
Tom Reese
Doug Brewer wrote:
I don't know if that proves you're not crazy.
Because I wrote:
snip
Well, I still say I'm not.
me thinks ye doth protest too much
Tom Reese
From: graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/09/22 Thu AM 01:37:16 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PDML 10th anniversary
I was here a bit before that while it was still with Pentax.
I want to thank Doug for keeping up this list for almost five years now.
And, mostly,
Hi All
I really like the distribution... i don't post a lot and don't get
answered alot but i read almost everything...
I REALLY think you need a forum but REALLY !
if you need any technical advice - you are welcome to ask.. i've been
maintaining couple of such forums by myself...
--
I print with an Epson 2200 and am very satisfied. In several years and
over 600 13 x 19 prints, I've never experienced a drip or a clogged
head. The 2400 is the latest version of this printer. I'll upgrade when
my 2200 begins to show signs of wear. Maybe sooner. My favorite matte
paper is
I knew this would get better when Bill got home:-).
On Sep 22, 2005, at 2:14 AM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Camera engineering (This is signifigant)
ARE YOU RETARDED are ARE YOU JUST PLAYING DUMB?
I'm just seeing how retarded I can
In a message dated 9/22/2005 3:44:06 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi All
I really like the distribution... i don't post a lot and don't get
answered alot but i read almost everything...
I REALLY think you need a forum but REALLY !
if you need any technical advice -
April 29, 1945...in anticipation of list start-up.
Happy Anniversary !!
Thanks Doug for keeping it afloat!
Still miss the Mafud/Robb flame wars
Steve (came in just after The Who)
P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Everyone seems to think that would be difficult. Hows this for an
action. It's easy enough to sense a K lens the body. So have a function
button, (such as the AF button on the *ist D), that's useless using K/M
lenses change function. Press that button
Quoting Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I was not photographing an air show but my camera broke down when it was 19
years old. It was bought in 1981 so it must have been in 2000. Anyway, I
believe that you joined in the fall of '99.
That was second time around.
I first joined in -96 or -97,
John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:05:12 +0100, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am not repeating the same argument
over and over..
Mark!
Sorry, but I don't think I can include that in the 2005 quotations list.
I'm way over quota in the irony
Michael,
This list as you and I know now is there for 10 years... Please be
reminded of timeless English saying - If it ain't broken, don't fix
it...
I really think your suggestion is redundant.
--
Boris
My favorite corruption of that saying goes:
if it ain't broke, break it, then fix it
g
Dave
On 9/22/05, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael,
This list as you and I know now is there for 10 years... Please be
reminded of timeless English saying - If it ain't broken, don't fix
Thursday, September 22, 2005, 12:34:25 PM, Pål wrote:
PJ - Original Message -
PJ From: Chan Yong Wei
I'd want a digital sensor sitting in a manual, mechanical body.
PJ Whats the point with that? It won't work without batteries anyway.
Well, this is a dream camera for any
On 9/21/05, cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip other than that, my camera is better than I am at this point.
...at this point?
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 9/22/05, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/21/05, cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip other than that, my camera is better than I am at this point.
...at this point?
Oops! Forgot the smiley.
vbg
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Dave,
My favorite corruption of that saying goes:
if it ain't broke, break it, then fix it
That would be Savage Theorem of ain't broken law ;-). Reminds me of
the book on Murfy Laws.
--
Boris
Seems to me the digital offering from Pentax is just not going the distance.
I have now had to send bodies back on 3 occasions (not the same body).
Is this indicative of what we can expect from Pentax in the digital era?
I have only ever had a single K1000 repaired (felt) of the 6 bodies I own.
On 9/18/05, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't know about the New York City advice. It may be heresy to some but
I've never liked the place.
Well, I know I'm jumping into this thread late, but my first visit to
NYC was back in July, and it was great! I can't wait until I can get
back
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 19:55:03 +0800, David Savage wrote:
if it ain't broke, break it, then fix it
If it ain't broken, don't fix it...
If it don't fit, force it. If it breaks, it needed replacing anyway.
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
How are you using them? I have two bodies that I work hard nearly every
day. With about 2 1/2 years of combined use and 15,000 frames or so, no
problems. Do you get them wet, drop them, subject them to a lot of RFI?
Paul
On Sep 22, 2005, at 1:16 AM, Kevin Waterson wrote:
Seems to me the
On 9/16/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank.
I have my old Raliegh 3 speedsp and Norco 10 speed, out in the garage. Air
in the tires
and new
chains should be all thats required.:-)
Geez, this new road-bike that I have has a Campy 10 speed cassette -
in the back! With the
HA!
The Savage Theorem (I like that. I'm going to keep it g) was born
years ago when I took something apart to fix it. I repaired the
original problem easily, but I broke a part that was working fine and
spent a lot of time cursing and fixing my mistake.
For this reason I am unwilling to try my
On 9/22/05, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ARE YOU RETARDED are
ARE YOU JUST PLAYING DUMB?
OK, that is a bit beyond the accepted level of discourse. Ad hominemattacks
just do not belong on a list like this.
Also, putting parts of your message in all caps is the net equivilentof
This one time, at band camp, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How are you using them? I have two bodies that I work hard nearly every
day. With about 2 1/2 years of combined use and 15,000 frames or so, no
problems. Do you get them wet, drop them, subject them to a lot of RFI?
When
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005, Kevin Waterson wrote:
When shooting dance most of the performances are of 2 minutes approx.
In that time I will fire off about 15-20 shots. I do this for 15-18 hours.
Is there a use-by on amount of images shot using a digital, like a
2 year/50,000 shot warranty?
What has
I'm coming to the conclusion that no good dead goes un-punished.
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Secondly this is totally different than the K/M
lenses ( millions of them remember) situation
we have been discussing at length because
IMAGE STABIZATION was never intended with K/M
lenses so it's a NEW
This idea gets floated through here periodically. The short answer is No.
I like the PDML being an email list. I like that it's sometimes hard to
handle the volume, because it takes dedication to deal with it. I like
that it's more personal than a web forum, that it's a little
anachronistic,
Now that's just silly, seems more like something Leica would introduce.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
To my surprise and amazement, I discovered that Pentax has a Limited
version of their 5.5x loupe. A perfect compliment to the Limited lenses?
LOL
My bad; of course there'll be some sort of power source to power the
electronic aspects of the camera like the sensor and writing to the
CF/SD cards, maybe even a meter. But I'm happy controlling shutter
speed/aperture totally mechanically, using a mechanical shutter...
though the ISO knob would
Wow, I hadn't even thought of that dynamo idea. It would be pretty
cool if the camera could generate its own power just by winding it
up... like those radios and torchlights they distribute to certain
parts of Africa.
On 9/22/05, Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hungry, be it traditional or
Yes it would, a couple of my lenses were improved dramatically by the
crop factor. I expect the light fall off is pretty drastic with the
15mm however, (not to say it's a bad lens, just the nature of the beast).
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, P. J. Alling wrote:
There's a
I was going to say maybe, but as I though about I came to the
conclusion, probably not.
Frantisek wrote:
Thursday, September 22, 2005, 4:33:48 AM, Mark wrote:
MR P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even K and M lenses could be made to work with in camera IS.
MR I suppose, if
Kevin,
Seems to me the digital offering from Pentax is just not going the distance.
I have now had to send bodies back on 3 occasions (not the same body).
Is this indicative of what we can expect from Pentax in the digital era?
I have only ever had a single K1000 repaired (felt) of the 6
Woo Hoo.
I was out in the field the last few days on some pipeline work east of
Toronto,and i quess
my laptop
was delivered to the office yesterday.
Now the fun begins.:-)
Dave
On 9/21/05, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Damn, I missed the deadline for the PUG again this month. Oh well, I
really didn't have anything good that matched the
theme anyway, so I guess I'll post another PESO. Sometimes it helps to
add a little text, sometimes not.
So without
Sounds like an Epson, RD1...
Chan Yong Wei wrote:
I'd want a digital sensor sitting in a manual, mechanical body. I
don't need an LCD screen behind. Just give me the usual knobs on top
of the body to control ISO, shutter speed (need not be stepless), and
the ring around lenses to control
On 9/22/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Woo Hoo.
I was out in the field the last few days on some pipeline work east of
Toronto,and i quess
my laptop
was delivered to the office yesterday.
Now the fun begins.:-)
Woo Hoo indeed!!
g
-frank
--
Sharpness is a
I don't find the green button an onerous burden, but it would be totally
unnecessary if the body supported the lenses features properly. On the
other hand this would add functionality to these lenses that was only
dreamed of, maybe not even that, when they were built. Two different
stories.
A possible case to be made for moving to digital?
g
Dave (doing' his bit for promoting enablement)
On 9/22/05, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LOL!!
Good one, Peter!
Geez, I missed PUG again - that's two months in a row now, after many
years of not missing one. Sigh - it's so
It is what it is, my friend, and to me it's a good thing.
Works for me...
Fred
Your level of use may exceed that of almost all list members. What kind of
failures are you experiencing?
Paul
This one time, at band camp, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How are you using them? I have two bodies that I work hard nearly every
day. With about 2 1/2 years of
On 9/22/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Woo Hoo.
I was out in the field the last few days on some pipeline work east of
Toronto,and i
quess
my laptop
was delivered to the office yesterday.
Now the fun begins.:-)
Yeah, they (american car companies) did that continuously in the 70's
and 80's until quality got so bad that they had to reverse course,
because foreign companies were eating their lunch with higher
reliability cars. A typical savings was replacing a nylon washer (meant
to isolate a
That does not speak well of the durability of the istD, but it might be
helpful to know how you've been using the cameras, in what environments,
and what had to be repaired. Personally, I never thought of DSLR's as 20
year cameras.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Kevin Waterson
Seems to me
Hi!
It is what it is, my friend, and to me it's a good thing.
Ditto.
--
Boris
On Sep 22, 2005, at 9:14, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
RFI? What's that and how would that affect the life of a digi?
Radio Frequency (Interference?). Basically, strong electromagnetic
fields is what he's referring to.
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minneapolis, MN
John,
Nice!
Butterfly shot is worthy of trying as a small pano
crop to include the blossom to its right. A loss of a
bit of the left side might, then, improve the balance.
Obviously, a greater DOF would have helped.
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=89
Would appreciate your
Good work, G ... it's a pretty nice feature and can certainly come in handy
when shooting in changing light situations.
Shel
Am I paranoid or perceptive?
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
.
I set the DS to ISO Coercion at 1600 limit, set the Fn menu ISO to
200, and wandered
G'day All,
I'm having problems viewing my PESO's GESO's. The pages load but the
images take forever to download (if they even do). The problem is the
same no matter which browser I use, and I have no problems viewing any
other web sites.
Before I start annoying my ISP's support people, I
On 9/18/05, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since there are over 100 photos, the web page for my Loire valley bike
trip necessarily involved a lot of batch processing in RawShooter
Essentials, IrfanView and Photoshop. For the most part this all worked
out well but a few of the shots
Thanks, gang ... I didn't even think about rezzing up. Certainly worth a
try to see what kind of quality can be had. It's also nice to know that,
with digi, a lower rez (200ppi v 330ppi) may give good results. I see a
batch of test prints in my future LOL
Shel
Am I paranoid or perceptive?
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 1:16 AM
Subject: 3rd *istD body bites the dust
Seems to me the digital offering from Pentax is just not going the
distance.
I have now had to send bodies back
Hi David ...hey all came up just fine - quickly (considering my dial-up
connection) and all the links worked.
Shel
Am I paranoid or perceptive?
[Original Message]
From: David Savage
I'm having problems viewing my PESO's GESO's. The pages load but the
images take forever to download (if
1 - 100 of 479 matches
Mail list logo
