At 06:23 PM 11/20/2005, you wrote:
Whew, feels like forever since I've put a PAW photo up. Figured I'd
get these two on the site before I leave for NY tomorrow ... two at
once.
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/44.htm
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/45.htm
Comments,
I'm making good progress with my scanning so here's another one from
the archives.
http://www.bluemoon.net.nz/photo/printsdb/view.php?p=127t=1
- Dave
David Mann wrote:
I'm making good progress with my scanning so here's another one from
the archives.
http://www.bluemoon.net.nz/photo/printsdb/view.php?p=127t=1
- Dave
Wow.
My mind's eye sees Gandalf and Frodo in the distance... :-)
Ciao,
Peter in Sydney
Rob Studdert wrote on 21.11.05 4:14:
Oh yeah,
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/P3032974m.JPG (~113kB)
Rob, I hate you very much :-P Do you have similar photos with black 43 and
31??? Please send me them to me if you want me to have heart attack ;-)
--
Balance is the ultimate
On 21 Nov 2005 at 10:44, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Rob, I hate you very much :-P Do you have similar photos with black 43 and
31??? Please send me them to me if you want me to have heart attack ;-)
LOL
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/PA152669m.JPG
Rob Studdert wrote on 21.11.05 11:58:
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/PA152669m.JPG
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/PA082548m.JPG
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/P9302147m.JPG
I hope you have a defib nearby :-)
Thanks for my heart care - especially that two
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Rob Studdert wrote:
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/PA152669m.JPG
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/PA082548m.JPG
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/P9302147m.JPG
I hope you have a defib nearby :-)
Have *you* got one? Someone stole them.
On 20/11/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Meet Roy.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/portraits/b_w9902.html
Great portrait Bill. Really nice.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Hello to all,
A week before I noticed that a beautiful and abandoned building I have
photographed the last winter was destroyed. I found the negatives and
copied them again. I have experimented with iodine bleach on the copies.
Here is the result:
Thibouille wrote:
Have the opportunity to buy these lenses. Primary use will be ist-D
but Z1 and others also (see signature). What do you think of these?
* Sigma 28-70mm 2.8EX Asph
* SMC Pentax-F 28mm 2.8
* SMC Pentax-F 20mm 2.8
How are these doing on the D? I seem to remember that the 20mm
Jack Davis wrote:
I think you got all the scene had to offer. NICE!
Jack
Thanks, Jack. The thistle is about to go, too.
ciao,
Peter in Sydney
P. J. Alling wrote:
That'a a very nice first effort.
I hate you, (Frank make a note.)
(Digital) beginner's luck, I'd say... :-)
Thanks for your comments.
Ciao,
Peter in Sydney
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Nice thistle!
Looks like you're doing well with the DL. Enjoy it!
I like the DS a lot, it's an amazing performer. The DL is essentially
a slightly less expensive version of the same camera, no reason for
it not to be excellent.
Godfrey
Thanks, Godfrey. I like
Paul Stenquist wrote:
A couple of snaps I took while watching football this afternoon.
They're on the *istD, FA 50/1.4, f2 @ 1/125th, ISO 800
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3894117size=lg
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3894122
Wow! She's a stunning little girl, and
On Nov 20, 2005, at 9:33 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
I was interested in how the camera performed with Leica glass.
From what perspective are you interested? The absolute res will
only be as good
as you'll see out of any of the Pentax DSLRs since it uses the same
sensor.
There seem to be
Thanks Peter. It's great to have someone around the house who is not
afraid of my camera :-).
Paul
On Nov 21, 2005, at 6:41 AM, Peter McIntosh wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
A couple of snaps I took while watching football this afternoon.
They're on the *istD, FA 50/1.4, f2 @ 1/125th, ISO 800
From: Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/11/21 Mon AM 11:47:43 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT -- Zeiss Ikon
On Nov 20, 2005, at 9:33 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
I was interested in how the camera performed with Leica glass.
From what perspective are you
- Original Message -
From: Peter McIntosh
Subject: Re: PESO - weeds
Thanks, Godfrey. I like their flowers, but the plant itself is evil -
lots of thorns. This one was a right bugger to get rid of - almost 3 feet
tall...
I believed that is a Scotch thistle. In Canada, they
- Original Message -
From: William Robb
Subject: Re: PESO - weeds
The best advice I have gotten so far is multiple doses of very weak
Glycosphate (Roundup) over several moths.
Several months, though if you insist on using moths, I suspect one will be
as good as another.
William Robb wrote:
I believed that is a Scotch thistle. In Canada, they are classed as a
noxious weed.
I have a few in my back yard I have been trying to eradicate for about
20 years. If you come up with something that works, tell me.
The best advice I have gotten so far is multiple doses of
On 21 Nov 2005 at 6:47, Bob Shell wrote:
I saw no real difference in image quality between lenses made by
Cosina, Konica and Leica. For that matter, some of my Russian lenses
looked as good.
With film the limiting factors in resolution are the size of the
silver halide crystals and
Okay, that's an exaggeration. It didn't ruin my weekend, but it
pissed me off some. And, really, it was my fault, not the camera's
Actually, it was a pretty good weekend. My middle daughter celebrated
her 17th, and she had a good party. Of course, pix taken, in this
case with the LX/K1.2
The best advice I have gotten so far is multiple doses of very weak
Glycosphate (Roundup) over several moths.
May I suggest you try dosing the weeds! VBG
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO - weeds
- Original Message -
Got to admit, #44 doesn't say much to me. I guess it is a cultural thing, me
being a rural Norwegian.
The other one suggests an 8, the bow on chair being the upper part, and the
hips being the lower part of the figure. Pleasant lines for mens eye, but
not a wow for this either. Delicate bw
Grace is a pearl. No doubt.
The reading picture is a winner. She is in her own little world, having a
great time. I like how the background kind of picks up the colours of the
book. Very nice bokeh. Excellent use of OOF.
The other picture is nice to, but it is not of the same standard.
Tim
I agree. The silver versions do look a little odd. But when you look
through the viewfinder, later at the final images, the colour of the
lens body doesn't matter at all.
BTW here are mine:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/PESO/Friends.htm
Dave
On 11/21/05, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The flower and the stem do not connect, in my eyes. Can't explain why.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: David Nelson
On 21 Nov 2005 at 8:10, frank theriault wrote:
On the way to the car, I notice that I'd left the shutter speed dial
at 1/2000th. I was shooting at about f5.6, and on the overcast day,
the meter was reading between 1/125th and 1/250th. I was between 3
and 4 stops underexposed. Poop!
Hmm,
http://www.pentaximaging.com/index.jsp
The new page is to quote from the pentaximaging main page
WWW.PENTAXSLR.COM TARGETS SLR USERS - REBATES UNTIL 2006
Not really special news...
I would speculate that the most important thing about this is that
it offers direct sales. Isn't there
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
This one's a 75mm Xenar.
O.M.G. ~ it just occurred to me, I'm just watching it!
Maybe I'd better commit! ;-)
Okay, I did it...
Talk to y'all tomorrow!
Keith, for a splittest briefest moment I thought you were going to let
me have it...
*sigh*
Boris
I
I like it. I wish it was larger. This kind of photo cries for a larger
format.
I like the lines. The yellow bush in right makes a pleasant counterpoint.
The lens thing (don't know the word in English) is a bit disturbing.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the
I promise, Boris, you can have the NEXT one. I have this one!
(See my comments to Godfrey...)
I doubt it I will be after RolleiFlex... Fuji rangefinders are very
attractive proposition. I need to do two things:
1. Get to meet one such camera in person.
2. Somehow get to know how reliable they
On 11/21/05, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, that's an exaggeration. It didn't ruin my weekend, but it
pissed me off some. And, really, it was my fault, not the camera's
Actually, it was a pretty good weekend. My middle daughter celebrated
her 17th, and she had a good party.
- Original Message -
From: Peter McIntosh
Subject: Re: PESO - weeds
I let this one grow because I wanted to photograph the flowers - well,
that's my excuse and I'm sticking to it :-) . A long-handled shovel
removed it with only a few spikes to me in revenge.
It will be
On 11/21/05, David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm making good progress with my scanning so here's another one from
the archives.
http://www.bluemoon.net.nz/photo/printsdb/view.php?p=127t=1
- Dave
Cool. I like the colours - light foreground, dark background. Very
well composed.
-frank
On 11/20/05, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A couple of snaps I took while watching football this afternoon.
They're on the *istD, FA 50/1.4, f2 @ 1/125th, ISO 800
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3894117size=lg
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3894122
Both
On 11/20/05, Peter McIntosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
This is one of the first photos taken with my new ist-DL. It's a weed -
a thistle. Just love the flowers they produce, though.
I like the DL. Easy to handle, and hasn't taken too long to get using
with a little confidence.
On 11/20/05, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That'a a very nice first effort.
I hate you, (Frank make a note.)
Check. Peter Mc's on the hate list. Thanks for the heads up, Peter.
-frank the list-keeper
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Nov 20, 2005, at 4:35 PM, keith_w wrote:
I just located a _superb_ f/3.5 Rollei TLR, a 3.5E, and I hope it's
still available the next time I check.
I found that the f/2.8s are NOT available for much less than the
national debt! I'd have to sell 3 or 4 cameras
I put the lens cap on, change film, change the shutter dial from
Automatic to 1/2000th so that the shutter doesn't stay open interminably
while I fire off the first three pre-shots [snipped] On the way to the
car, I notice that I'd left the shutter speed dial at 1/2000th.
Been there, done
I can only agree with Mishka:
P645 has very good mirror dampening. I don't have a single unsharp frame
so far, because of slow shutter speed. Only because of missed focus or
DOF...
It holds VERY good.
Meter is accurate, so shoot with slides and expect correct exposures.
And it is built solid,
On 11/21/05, David Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the recent windy period in Sydney, one of my Rosella plants was blown
over. I have since righted it and its peculiar response can be seen in
the following photo which I took a moment ago.
http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/rosella.jpg
*ist
Hi Gang.
Family were discussing things for Christmas presents over the weekend and i
asked my
daughter if
she was still using/enjoying her istD.
Yes was the answer.
So, i thought another lens would be inorder for her. She has my old 35-70
FA and i
thought i
would ask if
Mr. Brown can moo. Can you?
Paul Stenquist wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3894117size=lg
On Nov 21, 2005, at 7:05 AM, mike wilson wrote:
With film the limiting factors in resolution are the size of the
silver halide crystals and the thickness of the emulsion. With
digital it is the size of the individual sensor elements, the
smallest of which are far larger than the crystals in
I've pushed TriX 4 stops. Might be interesting photos. Not what you expected
but there is such a thing as serendipity.
Mark Stringer
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 7:10 AM
Subject: OT: How
Mr. Brown can go, cocka doodle doo!' There are so many wonderful things that
Mr. Brown can do.
(Not responsible for the accuracy of the above quote, although I've read the
book several dozen times. I'm very good at the cork popping sound, and I
deliver a decent moo.)
Paul
Mr. Brown can moo.
On 11/20/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whew, feels like forever since I've put a PAW photo up. Figured I'd
get these two on the site before I leave for NY tomorrow ... two at
once.
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/44.htm
Hope you have not tossed the film. You have two choices, since I know
you use a custom lab where you have good relations: 1--have them process
the film by inspection, 2--have them push the film 3 stops, and pray a bit.
Of course the images will not be as good as if shot at the correct
Mr Brown said:
Forget that swine flu, It won't make you blue.
Its the bug in Mr Chicken,that will give us a lick'n.
Nice shot BTW Paul.
Dave
Mr. Brown can go, cocka doodle doo!' There
are so many wonderful things that Mr. Brown
can do.
(Not
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On the way to the car, I notice that I'd left the shutter speed dial
at 1/2000th. I was shooting at about f5.6, and on the overcast day,
the meter was reading between 1/125th and 1/250th. I was between 3
and 4 stops underexposed. Poop!
Been
On 11/21/05, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hope you have not tossed the film. You have two choices, since I know
you use a custom lab where you have good relations: 1--have them process
the film by inspection, 2--have them push the film 3 stops, and pray a bit.
Of course the images will
To add another me too to this one, I love the second shot as well.
I'm not sure I'd have the guts to shoot that in a public place, but I
am glad you did. Made my morning here, and I'm not even done with my
first coffee.
-Mat
On 11/20/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whew, feels
I'll buy that for a dollar...
(hey, that's what I paid for my Polaroid 545 holder)
-Mat
On 11/20/05, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am awaiting an affordable full-frame digital back about the size of a
Polaroid 545 holder. Full-frame in that sentence means 96mm x 122mm.
Affordable means
This looks to me like a portrait that could only be taken of someone
that you know well, and have known for a long time.
Excellent work.
-Mat
On 11/20/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did a group picture of a family I have known for about 30 years last
night.
Roy is one of the
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Fred wrote:
As much as I sometimes get annoyed by forced automation, I do see the
advantage to my Super A's, which set the shutter speed automatically at
1/1000 or 1/2000 (I forget which) for the pre-shots, before reverting to
whatever settings were in place before changing
On the way to the car, I notice that I'd left the shutter speed dial
at 1/2000th. I was shooting at about f5.6, and on the overcast day,
the meter was reading between 1/125th and 1/250th. I was between 3
and 4 stops underexposed. Poop!
Been there, done that, got the poorly
William Robb wrote:
Thanks to all for the offer of help.
Gonz, I bet you don't know what I want, I'll post the auction results
when it's over
It'l be something interesting I'm sure. If its pentax 35mm, then I'm
guessing its the 50mm 1.2 that someone had, or the reflex zoom.
William Robb wrote:
I did a group picture of a family I have known for about 30 years last
night.
Roy is one of the people who more or less mentored me into making quality
pictures.
We would go out and shoot the same locations with each other, sometimes
shooting every day for weeks on end,
http://www.misenet.sk/USA/MV.html
It was pleasant calm dawn and then the Sun began to rise...
Bedo.
--
PS: I changed PESO to PAW because I have some more slides from my
southwest trip scanned and ready to show you. So stay tuned. ;-)
Hope you won't be disappointed...
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, i thought another lens would be inorder for her. She has my old 35-70
FA and i
thought i
would ask if someone has an F or FA 70-200 or 80-200 AF lens that they are
thinking of
selling.
Thought i would ask here first, and if
Pretty. I like the composition.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Peter Lacus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21. november
Rob,
Thanks, this works perfectly in ACR. No need for Pentax Raw anymore.
Jack
On 11/20/05, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20 Nov 2005 at 16:35, Jack Isidore wrote:
Rob,
I will try this. I should have a kodak grey card somewhere. I guess I
have to shoot this greycard under
Beautiful image. You nailed the exposure. Nice work.
Paul
http://www.misenet.sk/USA/MV.html
It was pleasant calm dawn and then the Sun began to rise...
Bedo.
--
PS: I changed PESO to PAW because I have some more slides from my
southwest trip scanned and ready to show you. So stay
On 11/19/05, Gary Sibio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a federal law which prohibits the photographing of bridges.
Yes, it's a stupid law but the police could have arrested the
photographers instead of just making them delete the images.
I took a picture of the Brooklyn Bridge this
Interesting. When I downloaded it, it arrived as a 13meg tif which opened
in Camera Raw.
Looks like a keeper lens. ACR removes colour fringing well.
Powell
At 09:21 PM 15/11/2005 , you wrote:
its about 8Mb, compressed with gzip. Untouched.
In the folder http://g0nz.com/raw
The file name
frank theriault wrote:
Okay, that's an exaggeration. It didn't ruin my weekend, but it
pissed me off some. And, really, it was my fault, not the camera's
snip
I run off to snap about 20 or 25 shots of her and her float, quite
thrilled to have gotten that many of her.
On the way to
On 11/20/05, Gautam Sarup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Ann Sanfedele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
They never check my back pack on the subway
though.
You're a lady. It would be really silly to
think you were up to something no good.
She may be a woman, but she's no lady g,dr
-frank (no
On 11/21/05, Peter Lacus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.misenet.sk/USA/MV.html
It was pleasant calm dawn and then the Sun began to rise...
Bedo.
--
PS: I changed PESO to PAW because I have some more slides from my
southwest trip scanned and ready to show you. So stay tuned. ;-)
Hope
At 12:49 PM 11/21/2005, you wrote:
I took a picture of the Brooklyn Bridge this summer.
Shit, I'm in big trouble now!
Not until you hear the knock at the door.
Gary J Sibio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~garysibio
There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who
Forgive me but am I missing something here? When I had the LX, I seem to
remember loading it and firing off the first couple of frames on auto.
Never seemed a problem. Why switch to a manual speed except of course if
the light's bad, well, just open the ap all the way?
Genuinely,
Cheers,
On 11/20/05, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/65160674/
Pentax MX, PanF+ 50 in Rodinal 1:25, 50mm lens (Not sure which one,
think it was the SMC-M 50/2)
-Adam
Right in front of the big church (which one's that? Metropolitan? I
know it's not St. James or
On 11/21/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forgive me but am I missing something here? When I had the LX, I seem to
remember loading it and firing off the first couple of frames on auto.
Never seemed a problem. Why switch to a manual speed except of course if
the light's bad, well, just open
On 11/20/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did a group picture of a family I have known for about 30 years last
night.
Roy is one of the people who more or less mentored me into making quality
pictures.
We would go out and shoot the same locations with each other, sometimes
On 21/11/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Dear Mr. Genuinely,
Over the years I got into the habit of putting the lenscap on when I
changed film, so just in case I drop the camera there's that little
extra protection for filter rings and the like. As well, I like to
have the cap
frank theriault wrote:
On 11/20/05, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/65160674/
Pentax MX, PanF+ 50 in Rodinal 1:25, 50mm lens (Not sure which one,
think it was the SMC-M 50/2)
-Adam
Right in front of the big church (which one's that? Metropolitan? I
Hi,
I have been in the US only a few months. I typically get my film
developed/printed at a
neighbourhood photo lab that I think is quite expensive at $14 for 36
exposures for
one set of 4x6 prints. Slides are developed/mounted for $9 or so.
Is that regular? I sent out a slide roll yesterday by
Kevin
Is this the mf or AF model.
F2.8 is to good for a learner. Now maybe for me:-)
Dave
This one time, at band camp,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, i thought another lens would be inorder for her. She has my old
35-70 FA and i
I've just started playing with RawShooter, (instead of Elements3) for
batch work .
Too early to draw any conclusions, other than bringing the batch
outputs into the PSE3 Organizer is another step in the workflow.
(sigh) It keeps growing
(by the way, I'm firmly in the Raw camp now).
dk
On
Sigh... Just after blowing my gear savings on a new flash and portable storage.
(my wife keeps saying she will not buy me camera gear for Christmas).
dk
I have a Tokina 80-200 2.8 that is coming up pre xmas.
It is in excellent condition and was purchased from another list member.
Kind
Same lens cap/locked shutter and body cap/locked shutter. Many times
I've removed the lens/body cap and held the LX near a light to hasten
the release.
Many times, when getting organized to take off for a shoot, I'd check
the bodies to see which were loaded. Often the LX had no lens attached,
only
I was going to suggest developing at 2-3 push stops and hope. But i see thats
been
done.vbg
Bummer that had to happen Frank.
My film mishaps were more, open up the back of the camera not thinking film was
still in
there.:-)
Now if i shoot a mechanical camera i wind the rewind knob to see if
Am I losing it or has Pentax dropped the *istD and DS from its lineup?
Seems they only show the DS2 and DL.
Could it be that Pentax is about to enter the new era of Pro DSLRs?
Will Samsung drag them kicking into the market to compete with the
fantastic Nikon D200?
Forget about the Canon 5D.
That's nonsense. One doesn't have to switch the camera to manual and a
high shutter speed when loading film. As we can see by all these stories
of screw-ups, it's probably not a well advised idea. If you're shooting on
auto, leave the settings exactly where they were when you change film, load
How would you use MLU without a tripod?
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
Boris wrote:
I think I can live with Pentax 645 and 75/2.8 lens...
But I think I'd want a MLU so that I won't have to
haul a tripod with me *all the time*
if I go shooting MF...
Why do you say that?
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
[Original Message]
From: Mat Maessen
This looks to me like a portrait that could only be taken of someone
that you know well, and have known for a long time.
Excellent work.
-Mat
On 11/20/05, William Robb [EMAIL
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/19/05, Gary Sibio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a federal law which prohibits the photographing of bridges.
Yes, it's a stupid law but the police could have arrested the
photographers instead of just making them delete the images.
I took a
graywolf wrote:
Actually, I was expecting a response about like we got when someone
called you Anne. Hum...? Lady Anne? grinning and ducking
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
or, that was no lady
Cotty wrote:
On 21/11/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Dear Mr. Genuinely,
Over the years I got into the habit of putting the lenscap on when I
changed film, so just in case I drop the camera there's that little
extra protection for filter rings and the like. As well, I
In really does not make any difference how old or primitive the camera.
Any large format photographer who says he has not taken some gorgeous
photos of his darkslides is a liar. My most likely mistake with the MXen
is to change the lens and not set the f-stop. Somehow I have done
several shots
Does any of you guys still have the link for a flash site, where some guy is
demonstrating different flashes (some movie file), screens etc. I remember
he said that the larger the light source is, the softer the light.
Answers are greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Jens
Jens Bladt
Why? What difference does it make if the frames are more or less exposed?
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
[Original Message]
From: Ann Sanfedele
I always switched to 1/2000,
set aperture at f22 and put the camera face down
on a table or on my bag -
to minimize light -
On 21 Nov 2005 at 13:12, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Please explain to those who are ignorant of such things why you have to
switch from auto to manual. Thanks,
Of course no one has to it just offers a far more consistent method to load
film. In marginal light you can end up waiting a few seconds
That bridge looks familiar. Am I right in thinking that W E Smith
photographed it quite a lot?
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 November 2005 21:28
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: another harassment by police story
On 11/21/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How would you use MLU without a tripod?
Aaron Reynolds claimed to be able to do it - did it all the time (so he said).
But he was the Senior Brother of the Brotherhood... LOL
Aaron? Can you respond? g
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois
On the way to the car, I notice that I'd left the shutter
speed dial at 1/2000th. I was shooting at about f5.6, and on
the overcast day, the meter was reading between 1/125th and
1/250th. I was between 3 and 4 stops underexposed. Poop!
Frank,
never mind - it could be worse. On my first
On 11/21/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why? What difference does it make if the frames are more or less exposed?
I wouldn't want to mix up the real photographs with the accidents. LOL
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am I losing it or has Pentax dropped the *istD and DS from its lineup?
Seems they only show the DS2 and DL.
Could it be that Pentax is about to enter the new era of Pro DSLRs?
Will Samsung drag them kicking into the market to compete with the
fantastic Nikon D200?
frank theriault wrote:
On 11/21/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why? What difference does it make if the frames are more or less exposed?
I wouldn't want to mix up the real photographs with the accidents. LOL
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri
On 21 Nov 2005 at 22:01, Bob W wrote:
never mind - it could be worse. On my first trip to the US I spent an entire
day
shooting with no film in the LX. I kept thinking to myself this film's
lasting
a long time, but was too dumb to check the dial...
Hmm, I shot off the top of the WTC tower
1 - 100 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
