This page recently came to my attention, nice little portrait flash primer:
http://www.qtm.com/WebPhotoSchool/Sh
ooting_Great_Portraits_with_Portable_Strobes/index.html
HTH
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Auction being finished I can know sxay I got myself a nice SMCP-F 28mm
2.8 at 90euros shipping included.
I'll love it ;)
Have to wait for it now ... Gz I'm impatient !
--
Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SFXn,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ...
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Thibouille wrote:
In Europe, I didn't see any DS2 yet.
Unless things have changed, they are not planning to ship it.
Kostas
Lovely.
I don't think postcards are necessarily pejorative either. Like a
perfect 3 minute pop song, a taunt Hollywood thriller, or a great pair
of shoes, there is _definitely_ a creative process going on there, if it
is done well.
D
Jens Bladt wrote:
Beautiful shot, Boris. I love post
Uh...
After reading this simple tutorial, I realise that colours are less retarded
than I am...:-)
There's a lot of lingo in that tutorial that's beyond me, but the interference
chart on page 12 and birefringence chart on page 15 were very interesting.
Jostein
Quoting Don Williams [EMAIL
Hi!
As you know I have a Helios 44K4 (formerly 58mm f2) lens modified to
be a single element soft lens. The process of making this kind of lens
has many side effects ;-)... One of those effects is that focusing
range is thrown out of whack. It is usually taken care of by attaching
an extension
Boris Liberman wrote:
Peter, it is usually a good idea to not forget the link ;-)...
Funny you may say, but one of the first shots I made with my MZ-6 and
Sigma 28-135 freshly brought to me from USA some years ago, was...
dried thistle...
Very competently and nice done.
Boris
Hi Boris,
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
First results with the new toys:
http://www.photosight.ru/photo.php?photoid=1145051
Arcelor's coking plant in Seraing, Belgium. Nothing extraordinary in
this shot, BTW. Just normal routine operation with a few badly sealed
oven doors and a bit of excess gas being
Hi Tom,
Beautiful shot Peter! Makes we want to go put some Velvia in the 67. It
looks slightly tilted, with the right horizon being lower than the
left. Maybe it's just the perspective, or maybe a slight rotation would
help.
thank you. Regarding the tilt - you're right, here is a bit more
You could take the lens to optician's, they have devices that tell the
focal length (or rather diopter strength) of a lens.
Use this formula to get focal length from diopters:
fl=1/D
fl you get is in meters and this is the closest this lens should come to
the sensor/film (infinity focus)
knowing
On 11/22/05, Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First results with the new toys:
http://www.photosight.ru/photo.php?photoid=1145051
That's one mother of a shot!!
There are steel mills about 50 miles from here, in Hamilton, Ontario,
Canada. There's a large bridge that goes over the
On 11/23/05, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://twosixteen.com/gallery/index.php?id=258
K1000. M28/3.5 (I think). tri-x. scanned from the negative.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
Cool shot! I don't know why, but for me it has a '60's feel (whatever
the hell
On 11/22/05, Carlos Royo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A new amazing development in the robo-photography age?
http://graphics.stanford.edu/papers/lfcamera/
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg18825255.000feedId=online-news_rss20
H...
I'm not sure what to say. LOL
-frank
--
On 11/22/05, Jack Isidore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really, is it that bad? I have a 1 meter wide print on my wall. My
wife hates it :)
Well, since you ask...
It doesn't do much for me, either. It's the completely washed out sky
that bothers me. As well, in the version I'm looking at, there
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/11/23 Wed PM 01:43:34 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Shoot now, focus later
On 11/22/05, Carlos Royo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A new amazing development in the robo-photography age?
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/22/05, Carlos Royo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A new amazing development in the robo-photography age?
http://graphics.stanford.edu/papers/lfcamera/
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg18825255.000feedId=online-news_rss20
H...
I'm not
On 11/23/05, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about why bother with that second step?
Well, in all seriousness, I'm not much for post-processing. For me,
the fun is getting the shot in the camera, with nothing more than
printing it full frame. Of course, sometimes a bit of burning and
Thanks, Frank. Much appreciated. I tend to prefer a little more
grain and contrast than most people. Maybe I should complete the 60's
feel and give it a green tint. g Thanks, again.
On 11/23/05, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/23/05, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice, Scott. You might crop about 20% off the left
side and top; I'm not sure whether that would improve
it or not.
Rick
--- Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://twosixteen.com/gallery/index.php?id=258
K1000. M28/3.5 (I think). tri-x. scanned from the
negative.
--
Scott
Well, in all seriousness, I'm not much for post-processing. For me, the
fun is getting the shot in the camera, with nothing more than printing it
full frame. Of course, sometimes a bit of burning and dodging and even
cropping may be necessary.
But fiddling in PS or whatever isn't what I
Maybe this time size does matter. The original is only 12000x3000 and
has lots of detail. It's overexposed, unsharp/hazy, has no foreground,
no background, washed outed and over saturated colors by design.
My idea was to catch the atmosphere in print.
If you want to waste some 10 Mb bandwidth you
On Nov 23, 2005, at 7:11 AM, Fred wrote:
Well, in all seriousness, I'm not much for post-processing. For
me, the
fun is getting the shot in the camera, with nothing more than
printing it
full frame. Of course, sometimes a bit of burning and dodging and
even
cropping may be necessary.
On 11/21/05, Hal Sandra Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Teach the value of fast lenses early. F2.8 should be the slowest in the bag.
Not that I want to start a controversy, but if lenses are being
purchased or acquired for a tyro, perhaps they should be primes.
-frank
--
Sharpness is a
I actually like it. But it needs more on the right. Go back and take
some more photos. Then stitch them together. Otherwise, cool photo.
On 11/21/05, Jack Isidore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our local swamp: http://leende.dse.nl/peso.htm
I hope you like it.
Jack
--
Scott Loveless
why do you have to import using PSE?
open the
card/camera and copy the
files.
Herb
I think its a default. I get the same thing when i plug a card into my reader,
it opens
Elements Photo
Browser and download.
I was going to fiqure out how to
On 11/21/05, Hal Sandra Davis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Teach the value of fast lenses early. F2.8 should be the slowest in the bag.
Not that I want to start a controversy, but if lenses are being
purchased or acquired for a tyro, perhaps they should
Is this on your Mac OS system or your Windows system?
On Mac OS X, you set the preferences for what to do when a camera or
card reader are connected using the Image Capture application.
Most of the time, I use iView MediaPro to transfer image files from
card to computer because it unwinds
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
This plenoptic stuff sounds like it might have some possibilities in the
future for certain types of picture taking, it's too early to say whether it
is truly useful or not. But if it does, the art of photography will grow to
exploit it.
You must
On 11/23/05, Jack Isidore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe this time size does matter. The original is only 12000x3000 and
has lots of detail. It's overexposed, unsharp/hazy, has no foreground,
no background, washed outed and over saturated colors by design.
My idea was to catch the atmosphere
Fiddling in Photoshop is such a disparagement. Fun with a camera
is a hobbyist point of view.
I meant no disparagement in my reply, Godfrey. I said Lots of
post-processing is not fun (for me) (note the for me). I spend enough
time in front of a computer already, and photography (even
On 11/23/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fiddling in Photoshop is such a disparagement. Fun with a camera
is a hobbyist point of view.
I don't think it's disparaging at all. Some actually enjoy doing that
stuff. I don't. Why is that disparaging? I was being slightly
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 10:34:46 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perhaps that could be true. In my daughter and sisters case, for now anyway,
they are
using the istD
as a manily PS camera. I ams trying to instill what little knowledge i have
on them but
so far its photos
of friends, cottages,
Hey gang,
Thanks to everyone who took a glance at my ice photo.
I'll round up the comments in this one mail. Hope I remember all.
To Graywolf, Frank, Cotty, Shel, Jack Davis, AnnSan and Tom C,
humble thanks for the nice words. Glad you liked it. :-)
There are some comments I feel I have to
Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's nice to know that I can salvage some poor photos in a pinch,
but a minimum of processing is my ideal.
That's a good ideal to strive for even for people who *do* enjoy
fiddling in PS or whatever.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
It's probably a good idea to err on the side of caution, however, my own
experience is that for almost 40 years I've been loading film in any kind
of light, including bright sun, and have ~never~ suffered any problems with
standard cassettes. The light trap on the cassette does an admirable bob,
Hi!
Frank, I have just one more point to make in regard to what you've said here:
That stuff really doesn't interest me. Never has, never will. I'm
not a pro. I like using my camera as a means of expressing myself,
but once the photo's taken, I take the roll to a lab, and say, here,
Hi All,
I just found an interesting web-site that has pictures
of all (most) photo store in Brooklyn and Manhattan (New York City),
according to their listed addresses.
It's interesting to see some of them...
http://donwiss.com/pictures/BrooklynStores/
Nor have I, still, the inner voice is warning that this canister may
not have been properly sealed/edge crimped and my would-be masterpiece
was light streaked beyond PS.
Sort of a belt suspenders mentality.
Jack
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's probably a good idea to err on
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 10:34:46
US/Eastern,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perhaps that could be true. In my daughter and sisters case, for now
anyway, they are
using the istD
as a manily PS camera. I ams trying to instill what little knowledge i
have on
Is this on your Mac OS system or your
Windows system?
My windows system Godfrey.
On Mac OS X, you set the preferences for what to do when a camera or
card reader are connected using the Image Capture application.
So far i have tried the mac with a
Laziness, mostly. It's easy. Plus, it allows me to do the catalogueing
immediately after the files are imported. I found that if I didn't do
it immediately, it didn't get done.
('Course now, I'm finding that this may be causing me grief further on
in the process. )
dk
On 11/22/05, Herb Chong
Pardon my ignorance. What's the difference between importing the files
with PSE and just copying them from the card to a folder on the hard disk?
Does importing imply or mean something more than that?
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
On 11/22/05, Herb Chong wrote:
why do you
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 08:43:34AM -0500, frank theriault wrote:
On 11/22/05, Carlos Royo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A new amazing development in the robo-photography age?
http://graphics.stanford.edu/papers/lfcamera/
Not really. It just automates the process. Creates a new directory
based on import date and time, and brings all the new images up in a
new window for cataloguing (or deletion).
If you move images around outside of PSE (i.e. in the windows
environment) after they've been catalogued, you may screw
I just had a chance to hold Pentax SMCP-D FA Macro 100 F/2.8
(it is the new smaller version).
My first impression: how small and lightweight it is.
I never had a chance to hold the F or FA version of that lens,
but this one is really light.
Second impression: when I attached it to the body (DS)
I am still trying to choose between a D FA and a used FA.
I wish I could try them side by side.
From your comments so far, Igor, I would lean towards the used FA...
Fred
It is interesting!
The site seems to emphasise the out of business retailers, for somereason. I
love the U Save Gelt Ltd store!
Dan
On 11/23/05, Igor Roshchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I just found
an interesting web-site that has pictures of all (most) photo store in
Brooklyn and
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 19:06:01 -, Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am still trying to choose between a D FA and a used FA.
I wish I could try them side by side.
From your comments so far, Igor, I would lean towards the used FA...
Fred
I would agree, unless size and weight are an important
Rick Womer wrote:
Nice, Scott. You might crop about 20% off the left
side and top; I'm not sure whether that would improve
it or not.
Rick
Somehow I don't think so.
The extra space on the left helps set the mood.
Removing it would pretty much isolate the two women, and change the feel
of
I am still trying to choose between a D FA and a used FA.
I wish I could try them side by side.
I bought the F variant used a few months ago, and like everyone here
said I would, I really love it... I see the advantage of small and light
lenses, of course, but one of the reasons why I like
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/tgiving.html
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
On 11/23/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/tgiving.html
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
LOL!!
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
- Original Message -
From: Paul Ewins
Subject: RE: LF lens
Krisjanis,
I don't have one to sell, but can heartily recommend the Schneider
Angulon 90mm f6.8.
I'll second that. Mine isn't for sale either. It is quite a nice little
lens.
William Robb
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/tgiving.html
Shel
It's been 5 minutes, and I'm still chuckling!
Thanks!
keith
http://www.msn.americangreetings.com/view.pd?i=382219626m=1652rr=ysou
On 23/11/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/tgiving.html
That raised a welcome smile, thanks.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
The light trap on the cassette does an admirable
bob,
your camera styles your hair?!
--
Cheers,
Bob (not waving, but crimping)
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 November 2005 16:38
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: How my LX
Part of a series. An attempt to get some experience converting to BW
using some of the techniques described by some here. I could not get
the hang of the channel mixer technique, I'll have to revisit that one,
I dont think I was doing it right. Anyhow, here is one of the pics that
I liked.
On 11/23/05, Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Part of a series. An attempt to get some experience converting to BW
using some of the techniques described by some here. I could not get
the hang of the channel mixer technique, I'll have to revisit that one,
I dont think I was doing it right.
frank theriault wrote:
On 11/23/05, Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Part of a series. An attempt to get some experience converting to BW
using some of the techniques described by some here. I could not get
the hang of the channel mixer technique, I'll have to revisit that one,
I dont think I
Auto focus? Hair up and back on the side has a 'sharper' look to me
than does her near eye area.
The skin has a flat, sort of washed out appearance. Since there appears
to be little in the way of shadows, maybe a smidgen of contrast and
darkening, as needed, to eliminate any resulting highlight
Hi Igor,
I just bought the D FA 50 macro. The lens hood that comes with that
fits very securely. It focuses faster than my FA100 macro and teh
images are just as sharp.
I love the FA100. It's built like a tank, is sharp and has better bokeh
than the Sigma or Tamron macros. It is heavier
On 23/11/05, Gonz, discombobulated, unleashed:
Part of a series. An attempt to get some experience converting to BW
using some of the techniques described by some here. I could not get
the hang of the channel mixer technique, I'll have to revisit that one,
I dont think I was doing it right.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 03:24:20PM -0500, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
http://www.msn.americangreetings.com/view.pd?i=382219626m=1652rr=ysou
Now that's what I call a jive turkey ...
On 11/23/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gonz, portraits are not about channel mixers or tones or this technique
or that. Portraits are about emotions. How does the viewer *feel* when
looking at a picture of another person. What emotion is there?
To me, it doesn't matter one bit how you
On 23/11/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
I ~still~ say it doesn't hurt that she looks like Scarlett Johansen...
g
-frank, who agrees 100% with what Cotty said
Nice to be in love again eh mate ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On 11/23/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice to be in love again eh mate ;-)
LOL!
I think I told this story to the list already, but if I didn't, or if
you didn't read it:
Last year when my eldest was visiting, we were sitting around the
dinner table, and Anne asked which actresses I
Nice to be in love again eh mate ;-)
LOL!
I think I told this story to the list already, but if I didn't, or if
you didn't read it:
Last year when my eldest was visiting, we were sitting around the
dinner table, and Anne asked which actresses I thought were hot.
Scarlett Johansen! I said,
Here's one of my latest images:
http://webpages.charter.net/glenweb/ni/Pittsburgh_3296.jpg
It was taken with my Pentax *istDS. Let me know what you think.
thanks,
Glen
well, you can't have it both ways. i have tried to change everything i
possibly can over to open the folder and nothing else. the only exceptions
are DVDs and audio CDs.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, November 23,
Windows makes it unnecessarily hard to change the global defaults. it tries
to figure out what type of media you just inserted and find the appropriate
player for it. any application capable of registering for such notification
can insert themselves into the list, but it is very hard to bring
Pure poetry. I fantastic image Gonz!
I am a bit too old for it, but I might write her a poem when I'm back at
Monday ;-)
(Off to work tomorrow)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some
it's not a matter of fun, it's a matter of quality. if all you want are
straight out of the camera JPG files for emailing, it's one thing. regularly
putting them up for other people to view needs some work. i'd even go so far
as to say if you aren't going to shoot RAW, there wasn't a need to go
What I think?
I think people should switch off the light before leaving ;-)
Now I understand why we have an energy crisis at the planet.
Nice picture BTW.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C.
alternate scenario - to get Robert's services, Frank has to pay twice as
much, plus pay more for BW film.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: Shoot now, focus later
that's another reason i abandoned RSE, no cataloging capability,
specifically to attach keywords and so on. that's why i tried a lot of tools
and had to settle on three, but nowadays, Adobe Bridge is pushing most of
the others except Thumbs+ out of the picture. i still use Ulead Photo
Explorer
Glen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's one of my latest images:
http://webpages.charter.net/glenweb/ni/Pittsburgh_3296.jpg
It was taken with my Pentax *istDS. Let me know what you think.
Glen - you were in Pittsburgh recently? (5 days ago according to the
EXIF data in your photo.)
We should have
i have both the D-FA and FA 100/2.8 macros. for the work that i like to do,
the main factor in choosing the D-FA over the FA is whether i am going out
in the field and have to walk far or not. the FA is so much heavier that i
usually don't go outside with it. also, the manual focus override
No focus ranger limiter on the D FA? Hmmm.
The poor autofocus performance in low light is not because of the lens.
It is because of the poor autofocus performance of Pentax DSLRs (those
produced so far) in low light.
Joe
Thanks Cotty.
Gautam
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 12:23 AM
To: pentax list
Subject: Flash Primer
This page recently came to my attention, nice little portrait
flash primer:
http://www.qtm.com/WebPhotoSchool/Sh
So, I finally got my first roll of film developed that I had taken
with my new used 645. I'm pleased with the results: the camera
produces great images. But, I have some questions about the
processing...or rather what the lab did after the processing.
The lab provides prints and a cd. Now I
Thanks for the feedback, Rick and Keith. I played around with
cropping it a bit as Rick suggested, but I think I prefer it as is.
Cropping the left and top loses the asymmetry, which I like. Plus, I
kinda like the door. To me it adds a sense of location and space.
Regardless, thanks so much
On Nov 23, 2005, at 10:02 PM, Steve Sharpe wrote:
Ultimately I am trying to decide if it is worth spending the money
(probably around $400) myself to buy a flatbed scanner with the
ability to do a half decent scan of medium format...or should I
continue to let the lab do it.
Depends on
Cotty wrote:
On 23/11/05, Gonz, discombobulated, unleashed:
Part of a series. An attempt to get some experience converting to BW
using some of the techniques described by some here. I could not get
the hang of the channel mixer technique, I'll have to revisit that one,
I dont think I
Even just the term workflow, as discussed here a lot hints at the
problem (for me) - it uses the word work, rather than fun - g.
However, for those that really love doing lotsa Photoshop processing,
then I can see that digital photography opens up a whole new avenue for
fun for them (even
Jack Davis wrote:
Auto focus? Hair up and back on the side has a 'sharper' look to me
than does her near eye area.
It does. Thats because I manually focussed, and I discovered later that
my *D has a problem with the position of the focus screen and auto focus
is actually better than
On Nov 23, 2005, at 10:02 PM, Steve Sharpe wrote:
Ultimately I am trying to decide if it is worth spending the money
(probably around $400) myself to buy a flatbed scanner with the
ability to do a half decent scan of medium format...or should I
continue to let the lab do it.
If they are
I agree. It's an excellent photo, a superb portrait. And it's a very
good conversion as well. The skin is suitably light in tone but not at
all blown out. It shows plenty of detail. The blacks are rich, yet they
show detail. Well done.
On Nov 23, 2005, at 10:30 PM, Gonz wrote:
Cotty wrote:
fun means doing something i like to the degree i like. i think that
producing images that don't show much effort once the shutter is released
also means that the photographer don't value them much. the QD GESOs take
me about 20 minutes per image to get them to the point there it then takes
me
I know there is a technique for shooting stationary subjects with huge
dynamic range, by taking a few bracketed exposures and combining those
bracketed exposures into a single image. Can anyone point me to an on-line
tutorial that explains the best way to do this? I want to try this on some
On 23 Nov 2005 at 23:02, Glen wrote:
I know there is a technique for shooting stationary subjects with huge
dynamic range, by taking a few bracketed exposures and combining those
bracketed exposures into a single image. Can anyone point me to an on-line
tutorial that explains the best way
you take images one stop apart from about -3 to +3 from your correct
exposure. the old way of merging was to load the images into separate layers
in Photoshop and create channel masks for each layer to show only the parts
of the image layer that contains the exposure you want. this takes many
On 23 Nov 2005 at 14:00, mike wilson wrote:
How about:
£2000 on high tech photogear
£2000 on top end computing and software
£1000 worth of time
Results worthy of the Barbicam?
Priceless.
I guess you have to start somewhere. The following invention looked a little
impractical at the time
Glen,
I'm sure I'd often not be able to answer this sort of question myself,
but would you care to tell me what about this image 'does it for you.'
IOW, do you 'like' it and if so, can you define why.
Is it the camera's performance, light patterns orare you looking,
for example, for direction
In a message dated 11/23/2005 4:24:27 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 5:28 AM
Subject: Re: Which RAW converter?
I think its a default. I get the same thing when i plug a card into my
I am saving my pennies for an Epson 4870. I have access to one at the
moment (limited access), and I've gotten some very good results with
it. I scanned a bunch of my father's old MF negatives earlier in the
week, and hopefully I'll get a chance this weekend to scan some more,
and get a gallery
Tim Øsleby wrote:
What I think?
I think people should switch off the light before leaving ;-)
so, he took the picture while all the cleaning crews were at work ... maybe?
On 11/23/05, Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I certaintly enjoy viewing it as much as I enjoyed taking it,
since I don't know anything about taking portraits and we must have
taken 200 pics that day and very few of them were keepers, and even
fewer felt as right as this one.
Sometimes you
On Nov 23, 2005, at 9:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So far i have tried the mac with a 512 mg jump drive(i just drag
and dropped into a test
folder)and a CF card reader. I think i did the same thing.However i
did this before installing PS on the
Mac so that might change a bit.
On 23/11/05, E.R.N. Reed, discombobulated, unleashed:
so, he took the picture while all the cleaning crews were at work ... maybe?
Bulb inspectors.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
