There's some great stuff there - thanks for the link
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Derby Chang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 December 2005 05:10
To: Pentax Discuss
Subject: Magnum in Slate
A little while ago, Slate started posting Magnum photos on a
weekly
Have to say that I am really happy with this lens. The istDS + pancake
lens combo is great for those times when you want something compact
and unobtrusive. If only the DA40 limited was a little faster...
Here are some Koi in Hawaii
http://istds.blogspot.com/2005/12/koi.html
77mm Hoya HMC Super UV filter - like new - used only two or three times.
$20.00 including shipping anywhere in US. Add a dollar or two for shipping
outside US. Please contact off list. Tks!
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
Yep.
This Durst Labda is located in Europe.
But i have heard, that professional Epson printers are even better...
? I should try another lab with Epson next time.
Gasha
Paul Stenquist wrote:
It was mentioned by someone else. Gasha, I think.
Paul
I do not agree with you.
Maybe it depends on type of corner store.
My Lab, which does film scanning writes on CD JPEG files 3072x2048 or
something in size.
They are over sharpened little bit, have grain aliasing problems.
NPH-400 was complete disaster... I'm talking about Noritsu Lab
Toralf Lund wrote:
There are always trade-offs when you make a unit meant to do several
different kinds of jobs, but it seems to me that it should be possible
to make a photo scanner *very nearly* as good for film as a
dedicated film scanner provided that you design it mainly with film in
I like this. It doesn't look much in the small image, but the large one
is full of detail with the ripples and the frozen splashes. It gives an
overall impressionistic feel with the added dimension of frozen action.
I'd like to see it as a 16 x 12 inch picture on the wall.
Leon
E.R.N. Reed wrote:
Toralf Lund wrote:
There are always trade-offs when you make a unit meant to do several
different kinds of jobs, but it seems to me that it should be
possible to make a photo scanner *very nearly* as good for film as
a dedicated film scanner provided that you design it
Hi Don,
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 09:42:54 +0200, Don Williams wrote:
I need more help and the quickest way to
get it is to ask PDML.
1. Is the TIFF file output from the *ist
D a real RAW file -- but with TIFF format?
No, it is NOT raw anymore, the conversion from bayer-pattern
to full RGB info
Toralf Lund wrote:
E.R.N. Reed wrote:
Toralf Lund wrote:
There are always trade-offs when you make a unit meant to do several
different kinds of jobs, but it seems to me that it should be
possible to make a photo scanner *very nearly* as good for film as
a dedicated film scanner
Very nice :-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick
Schork
I regret not shooting raw at our Christmas party
Last night I shot some candids at our party. I used the large jpg setting
after reading a lot of this debate I thought I would save some time
converting images at home. This was indoors with a flash. My settings were
point and shoot (green?)
On Dec 2, 2005, at 6:18 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
If you can afford a new flatbed scanner, you may do just as well or
better
by getting a good, used film scanner.
Dedicated film scanners that handle medium format are pretty
spendy. Why
don't you spend a few minutes and check some
Okay. Thanks a lot. I took the camera
outside again and did some more tests in
the snow. I asked about TIFF files
because I've been using TIFF for
photomicrography. We need big files for
big prints and the results seem good.
This is what I found. The RAW and TIFF
snow scenes were all very
Fabulous. A huge collection. Thanks for the tip.
Paul
On Dec 3, 2005, at 12:09 AM, Derby Chang wrote:
A little while ago, Slate started posting Magnum photos on a weekly
page of theirs. Trente Parke has one of his classics on the Today's
Pictures this week.
The two interactive essays are
Tiff files are not RAW. They're camera processed files saved in Tiff
format. RAW files are not processed, they're RAW data.
The camera's sharpening works with tiff. It does not affect the RAW
data.
RAW files should have a PEF suffix. If you didn't find any, you
probably didn't shoot any. Try
Hi Don,
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 15:00:52 +0200, Don Williams wrote:
snip
This is what I found. The RAW and TIFF
snow scenes were all very good without
exception. The histograms showed that
the five stops the camera is capable of
Actually, it may be close to 6 stops ...
were to be found between
Hi Paul,
Yes indeed. The problem was with
Windows. For some reason it didn't see
the *.pef files. But the Pentax Browser
sees both and its easier to handle the
files with it anyway. But if there are
TIFF and RAW on the same card, the RAW
files can't be found by Windows. This
happened
I'll try to write this without too many typos. I've looked at a couple of my
recent messages and found them full of mistakes.
I need more help and the quickest way to get it is to ask PDML.
1. Is the TIFF file output from the *ist D a real RAW file -- but with TIFF
format?
Just to
Hi Jan,
Sorry ... I haven't made myself clear. I
haven't used the 'in camera' histogram
at all. I've been talking about
Photoshop only. I haven't tried working
on that tiny screen at all.
I do shift it all to the right and that
gives excellent results. The snow has
fallen from the trees
I usually do, but this time wanted for people to look
at it at 100%
Regards
Albano
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/2/2005 10:15:04 AM Pacific
Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyway, I'll post some more pesos, gesos, etc, so
you
can also criticize Nikon's
I have an Epson 3170 and have found it good enough for my needs. I
don't print larger than 8x10 and it seem fine for that. I've scanned 35mm
slides and negatives, as well as 6x9cm 6x6cm negatives.
I have a couple of sample scans here:
Gasha,
Thanks for answering my question. Pro inkjet printers do a terrific
job and if I had a chance to make a current comparison, it's possible
I'd be content with their product. Memory has a tendency to glorify the
past. Especially when it can't be tested.
Jack
--- Gasha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fred,
Your 35mm scans are very much the same quality as I've experienced with
the 3170.
As has been said here, it all depends on your expectations.
Jack
--- Fred Widall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an Epson 3170 and have found it good enough for my needs. I
don't print larger than 8x10
These look awful I must be missing something.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Fred Widall
I have an Epson 3170 and have found it good enough for my needs. I
don't print larger than 8x10 and it seem fine for that. I've scanned 35mm
slides and negatives, as well as 6x9cm 6x6cm
On Dec 3, 2005, at 10:58 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
These look awful I must be missing something.
Whatever you're missing, I'm missing it too. These are nowhere near
the boundaries of acceptable.
Bob
On Dec 2, 2005, at 9:46 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Here is a hint... Take a plastic slide frame, polish the inner side
of the frame so as to allow smooth not scratching motion of the
film if you want to scan a strip frame by frame... Applying such a
frame solved all my flatness problems
You can see what they are. Boy in swing, garden with trees, house in garden,
and water, sky and houses.
What are you guys complaining about? ;-)
Honestly. They are far from acceptable.
BTW. I did a very rough test, scanning some 35 dia with my new Epson RX700
yesterday. They are better (read
Could this be part of the reason why many experience better results scanning
dia than negative film?
Mounted dias is 1-2mm above the glass, depending on what kind of dia frames
used.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very
On Dec 3, 2005, at 1:02 AM, Patrick Schork wrote:
Have to say that I am really happy with this lens. The istDS + pancake
lens combo is great for those times when you want something compact
and unobtrusive. If only the DA40 limited was a little faster...
Here are some Koi in Hawaii
In a message dated 12/2/2005 9:20:25 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Marnie,
Any file you print should be interpolated or upsized to deliver best
results with a given printer at a given dimension. My Epson 2200 likes
360 dpi, so to print 11 x 17, I upsize the RAW to the
Am I right that you're using Pine for a mail reader, Kostas?
If that's the case, may I humbly suggest that you try a slightly more modern
mail reader?
Jostein (Øksne)
Quoting Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, Paal Jensen wrote:
It cost 26 000 + Nkr discount
Hi Peter,
It's a good thing to enable Javascript if you want it to work...:-)
Which browsers and versions are you referring to?
The form was made in 2002, and should be working in all browsers since then. I
know Mozilla/Firefox may be a bit more picky than the rest of the pack, but I
haven't
I've gotten pretty good results from my Epson 2400 and 35mm slides. I gave up
pm trying to scan negatives. I haven't tried MF, but I haven't shot MF.
Dust is a problem, but overall I've been happy with my scans. OTOH, getting
the color right is a bit of a problem. It's why when I was shooting
What's dia? Mounted transparencies?
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
[Original Message]
From: Tim Øsleby
Could this be part of the reason why many experience better
results scanning dia than negative film?
Mounted dias is 1-2mm above the glass, depending on what
kind
Has anyone made their own visible dust brush? As described here:
http://tinyurl.com/d8k93
I think it's time to clean my sensor and I hate to spend so much on a brush,
so I was thinking of doing it myself.
Has anyone had success doing it themselves? Any particular brand of brush to
recommend?
On Dec 3, 2005, at 8:58 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/2/2005 9:20:25 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Marnie,
Any file you print should be interpolated or upsized to deliver
best
results with a given printer at a given dimension. My Epson 2200
Abe's of Maine seems to have a somewhat shady reputation.
Doug Franklin wrote:
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 10:59:51 -0500 (GMT-05:00), Kenneth Waller wrote:
B+H is my most trusted source of photographic equip.
I stick with BH, Adorama, Cameta, and Abe's of Maine, personally.
TTYL, DougF
The calendar I made for 2005 of selections from
SIGN LANGUAGE is reissued
for 2006 on sale with other stuff on cafe
press Here:
http://www.cafepress.com/annsanstuff
There is a free shipping deal til Dec 6 (but only
if you get $50 worth
of stuff and only up to $15 - nothing I could
control
I think the Pentax site mentions something about haveing Browser and lab 1
installed before you can up frade to the latest version.
I want to install it on the ibook.
I upgraded my PC but it did not ask for or delete the previous version.
Anyone know
I'm on digest so if you want to off list
Yep, it is. Sorry about that one.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 3.
Either this lens is very special or someone seriously over paid...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemssPageName=ADME:B:EOIBUAA:US:11Item=7567033431
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
In a message dated 12/3/2005 9:38:49 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Canon EOS 300D returns images with a native pixel resolution of
2048x3072. Printed at 360ppi, this would equal a 5.7x 8.5 inch image
area. If you want to print to a larger image area and retain 360
In a message dated 12/3/2005 9:45:06 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
writes:
The calendar I made for 2005 of selections from
SIGN LANGUAGE is reissued
for 2006 on sale with other stuff on cafe
press Here:
http://www.cafepress.com/annsanstuff
There is a free shipping deal til
I agree, I guess they are as suspected. Resolution is OK but
handling of contrast is bad.
I have use a scanner like that for 6x6 slides, and the results were
acceptable of the contrasts of the slide wasn´t too difficult.
Colour negatives are not as good.
DagT
Den 3. des. 2005 kl.
In a message dated 12/2/2005 5:43:41 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/68708749/
*istD, ISO200, 18-55mm DA 30seconds at f22 and 18mm.
Playing with long exposures and my favourite building.
-Adam
===
MUCH better than the last shot you
Hi Patrick,
Have to say that I am really happy with this lens. The istDS + pancake
lens combo is great for those times when you want something compact
and unobtrusive. If only the DA40 limited was a little faster...
I must say this combo intrigues me as well...
Here are some Koi in Hawaii
it's a good lens, and they sell for about £250- ($430-) in the UK, so to one
of us that looks like a good price.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: P. J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 December 2005 17:55
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: e-Bay follies
On Dec 3, 2005, at 12:50 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Abe's of Maine seems to have a somewhat shady reputation.
Abe used to advertise as Honest Abe when he was still in NY. As I
heard the story, the state told him he could not advertise that way
any more because it was so manifestly not
That's right, Dave.
None of us received your mail. :-)
Jostein
Quoting Dave Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello out there.??
My pdml mail account seems to be dead, but i'm getting the digest on mac dot.
I resubed but nothing.
Looks like digest for a while.Is there a problem Doug.My
Yes, the Kodak 16mp sensor...
Jostein wrote:
Quoting P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Since you can change backs on the H1 you can always get the Kodak 16mp
MP back for it.
Sure.
In case you don't know, the announced Pentax MedF digital will have a 16 mPix
sensor. That's my reason
Need some help her gang.
I posted this on the PS list, but its a bit slower than the collective, so i
thought i'd
try here to.
In the link below, a client has asked if i can remove the two trucks. She knows
i have
basic PS skills and has a second
choice should i be unabel to do what she is
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 12:50:09 -0500, P. J. Alling wrote:
Abe's of Maine seems to have a somewhat shady reputation.
I stick with BH, Adorama, Cameta, and Abe's of Maine, personally.
I haven't dealt with them in several years, but didn't have trouble
back when I was dealing with them. IIRC,
I didn´t. I received nothing for almost 24 hours, but now it seems
to be working again.
DagT
Den 3. des. 2005 kl. 19.37 skrev Jostein:
That's right, Dave.
None of us received your mail. :-)
Jostein
Quoting Dave Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello out there.??
My pdml mail account
Taken a couple of weeks ago, when I still couldn't raise my hands up
to my face with much comfort, so I was using the Yashicamat with the
waist-level viewer.
I think she was getting exasperated or impatient waiting for the streetcar g:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3923592
On 12/2/05, Albano Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi gang,
First, I went to the dark side. I got a Nikon D50 with
the kit lens, snip
http://www.albanogarcia.com.ar/ladybird/DSC_0232.jpg
http://www.albanogarcia.com.ar/ladybird/DSC_0238.jpg
I never do this kind of photography, it was very
I can't comment on the lens, but the picture is pretty damn cool!
Christian
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Schork [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 4:02 AM
Subject: PESO: SMCP-DA 40 Limited
Have to say that I am really happy with
On 12/2/05, Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
500mm seem on the expensive side...
best,
mishka
Then don't buy it.
-frank, always happy to encourage capitalist principles g
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
;-))
Jack
--- Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's right, Dave.
None of us received your mail. :-)
Jostein
Quoting Dave Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello out there.??
My pdml mail account seems to be dead, but i'm getting the digest
on mac dot.
I resubed but
On 12/3/05, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't comment on the lens, but the picture is pretty damn cool!
I agree with Christian on both counts:
It's a damn cool pic.
And, Christian can't comment on the lens. (neither can I, btw) g
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri
On 12/2/05, David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 3, 2005, at 4:23 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
No, Perry White was Clark Kent's boss, Superman's alter-ego.
Superman had
no boss.
Until he got married.
LOL
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Hi Don,
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 17:03:40 +0200, Don Williams wrote:
Sorry ... I haven't made myself clear. I
haven't used the 'in camera' histogram
at all. I've been talking about
Photoshop only. I haven't tried working
on that tiny screen at all.
OK, understood ...
What I meant to say was
Has anyone made their own visible dust brush? As described here:
http://tinyurl.com/d8k93
I have a good quality synthetic artists brush. I took a loop with me to
the art store to check the bristle tips and got a brush without too much
sizing in it.
Wash and rinse as they instruct.
They only
On 12/2/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip I don't drink coffee.
That's too bad.
-frank (black, no sugar)
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:08:17 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Need some help her gang.
I posted this on the PS list, but its a bit slower than the collective, so i
thought i'd
try here to.
In the link below, a client has asked if i can remove the two trucks. She
In a message dated 12/3/2005 11:33:54 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a good quality synthetic artists brush. I took a loop with me to
the art store to check the bristle tips and got a brush without too much
sizing in it.
Wash and rinse as they instruct.
They only
Donning my Nomex fireproof garments I step into the fray..
I have made many 16X20 RA-4 darkroom prints from medium format images on
Fuji Crystal Archive paper. I also have scanned some of the same 645 and 6x9
negs and transparencies on an Epson 3200 and printed on epson 1270, 2000,
and 9600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/3/2005 9:45:06 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
writes:
The calendar I made for 2005 of selections from
SIGN LANGUAGE is reissued
for 2006 on sale with other stuff on cafe
press Here:
http://www.cafepress.com/annsanstuff
Tell it to take some Xanax
However - apparently SOME of your mail got through
:)
ann
Dave Brooks wrote:
Hello out there.??
My pdml mail account seems to be dead, but i'm getting the digest on mac dot.
I resubed but nothing.
Looks like digest for a while.Is there a problem
My black 77mm Ltd arrived, so I'm selling the silver one I bought in
July. Brand new, barely used. No markings on the barrel or on the
glass. Asking $575. Paypal, personal checks and money orders accepted.
Amita
I get almost no spam...
the stuff that gets through is double-speak
subject line trash
This one came through twice from supposedly
different people.
Abolish all that you owe with out mailing an
other dime.
ann
Sorry Dave, but you'll need a lot more than basic Photoshop skills to
do that.
Do you have other shots from the same day with large areas of grass
you could clone from?
Even if you do, you're looking at hours and hours of detail work to
do that right. Personally, I wouldn't think of
On Dec 3, 2005, at 8:50 AM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
Could this be part of the reason why many experience better results
scanning
dia than negative film?
Mounted dias is 1-2mm above the glass, depending on what kind of
dia frames
used.
It's certainly part of the reason for this scanner (Epson
On 12/3/05, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3923592
I like this one. The square framing works well. I'm undecided whether
I'd like it more with more blurred background. It would definitely
change the feel of the picture a bit, but I'm not sure
My 3170 says; made in Indonesia.
Jack
--- Bill Lawlor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Donning my Nomex fireproof garments I step into the fray..
I have made many 16X20 RA-4 darkroom prints from medium format
images on
Fuji Crystal Archive paper. I also have scanned some of the same 645
and
- Original Message -
From: Mark Stringer
Subject: Re: Pentax RAW vs JPEG Shootout (was - Re: Why I Haven't Yet
Switched)
Maybe matrix metering would have helped but...
Using an auto flash rather than depending on TTL would have helped more.
Seriously.
William Robb
On 12/3/05, Fred Widall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For its price I thought it was excellent, although I believe its now been
replaced by the 4870 (or something similar). I replaced a Minolta Dual
Scan II with the Epson as I wanted the ability to scan medium format
negatives at a very reasonable
On Dec 3, 2005, at 9:49 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Upsampling:
Uh, I don't know how to upsize during RAW conversion. All I know is
how to
resize using the Image Size menu selection (which is post conversion).
In Camera Raw v3.x, you set the output colorspace, sizing, depth, and
Say No. Too much work.
Godfrey
On Dec 3, 2005, at 6:08 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Need some help her gang.
I posted this on the PS list, but its a bit slower than the
collective, so i thought i'd
try here to.
In the link below, a client has asked if i can remove the two
trucks. She
Most of Pentax cameras are assembled in Philippines: all S-series Optios and
all DLSR's.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 9:34 PM
Subject: Re: Who makes what? (was: Thanks! firmware update for
Hi Jostein,
I've tried IE 6.0 and Firefox 1.5. The drop-down list box isn't
populated with anything; I can't therefore select which gallery I want,
and the form won't submit.
Ciao,
Peter in Sydney
Jostein wrote:
Hi Peter,
It's a good thing to enable Javascript if you want it to
Acceptable for MF scans.
Sometimes i think about upgrade, but then... to get any profit from real
MF film scanner, i have to make very LARGE prints.
Much larger than 40x60cm. And more expensive...
Maybe i should get a car instead of pro film scanner?
Gasha
Bob Shell wrote:
On Dec 3,
http://www.resellerratings.com/seller2003.html
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
[Original Message]
From: P. J. Alling
Abe's of Maine seems to have a somewhat shady reputation.
Doug Franklin wrote:
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 10:59:51 -0500 (GMT-05:00), Kenneth Waller wrote:
Abe's Of Maine is located in Brooklyn, NY and has been there since 1986.
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
[Original Message]
From: Bob Shell
Abe used to advertise as Honest Abe when he was still in NY. As I
heard the story, the state told him he could not advertise that
Hey, folks! In an effort to stimulate the gear-headedness around
here, I thought I might mention a little problem I'm having with an M
series lens. The blades won't stop down past f16. I can see marks on
the blades, so it's fairly obvious where f22 should be, but moving the
aperture ring from
Hi Dave no way you're gonna do that with your skill level. Perhaps
you should pass on the assignment ...
If you want to try it, go to the Adobe Photoshop Users Forum and ask there.
Very helpful and knowledgeable bunch, although it may take some time to get
a reply as this is the weekend.
Hi Tim,
Overall I liked this photo. I like old places and old things, and the
photo reminded me of many places I've visited. So, it got me on an
emotional level.
Technically it can use some improvement. A little more contrast in the
building and foreground improved the pic on my monitor. The
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the link below, a client has asked if i can remove the two trucks. She
knows i have
basic PS skills and has a second choice should i be unabel to do what she is
asking.
Any ideas as to how to go about this. Link to a web site or such.
I know i ask more tahn i give,
A 360 dpi file is optimum for the Epson 2200 and 2400. Yes, there are
files that will print fine at 180 dpi, but as you noted, not all will
do so. To keep my methods standard, I upsize every file to print at 360
dpi. But as I noted, I do it in the RAW converter. It may not always be
necessary,
IF you're wondering, I definitely prefer the Minolta.
Jack
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 3, 2005, at 8:50 AM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
Could this be part of the reason why many experience better results
scanning
dia than negative film?
Mounted dias is 1-2mm above the
I opened the large images in PS and viewed them there. The difference
between the two scans was quite obvious, with the Epson scan looking a lot
softer. When reduced to web-sized JPEG's the differences don't appear to be
as great, and I had to look carefully to see them.
While this may not have
On Dec 3, 2005, at 5:59 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
A 360 dpi file is optimum for the Epson 2200 and 2400. Yes, there
are files that will print fine at 180 dpi, but as you noted, not
all will do so. To keep my methods standard, I upsize every file to
print at 360 dpi. But as I noted, I do
I shot some work with the DA 12-24 today. The pics are for a magazine
article about bedroom decor. I posted one example of a 12mm shot. I'm
going to correct the perspective on this for the pub, but I figured the
pdml would rather see what the lens gives you. The exposure is f8 at
1/15th. Three
Bob Shell wrote:
On Dec 3, 2005, at 5:59 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
A 360 dpi file is optimum for the Epson 2200 and 2400. Yes, there
are files that will print fine at 180 dpi, but as you noted, not all
will do so. To keep my methods standard, I upsize every file to
print at 360 dpi. But
I've read that 360 is optimum for Epson printers in more than one place
and on more than one occasion. 300 may be fine, but 360 is working for
me. . I don't think there's a downside to it. I have experimented with
resolutions as low as 200 and have seen inferior results when viewed at
close
On 12/3/05, Mat Maessen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like this one.
Thanks, Mat. I appreciate that you took the time to look and comment!
The square framing works well. I'm undecided whether
I'd like it more with more blurred background. It would definitely
change the feel of the picture a
What do you like about it, Mat? It doesn't do a thing for me on any level.
Maybe I'm missing something.
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
[Original Message]
From: Mat Maessen
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3923592
I like this one. The square framing works
On 12/3/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you like about it, Mat? It doesn't do a thing for me on any level.
Maybe I'm missing something.
I doubt that you're missing anything.
It's just a girl waiting for a streetcar.
Thanks for looking and commenting though, Shel.
cheers,
Don't forget that the Epson 2450 is about four generations behind the
best Epson flatbed. Even my old 3200 can outperform it by quite a bit.
Paul
On Dec 3, 2005, at 6:06 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I opened the large images in PS and viewed them there. The difference
between the two scans was
On 12/3/05, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I shot some work with the DA 12-24 today. The pics are for a magazine
article about bedroom decor. I posted one example of a 12mm shot. I'm
going to correct the perspective on this for the pub, but I figured the
pdml would rather see what the
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
