frank theriault wrote:
Passport photo? Tell me you didn't Frank
http://photo.net/shared/portrait-bits.tcl?user_id=492668
LOL!
Malcolm
On Feb 12, 2006, at 12:17 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Sekonic L-358
I believe spot metering attachments are available as accessories.
The accessory is the L-358VF I think. I have one here but it's been
ages since I actually used it.
- Dave
On Feb 12, 2006, at 7:28 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
I can also understand guys who wouldn't use their best in less than
ideal conditions but suppose you're out without your pristine lens
the opportunity arises that requires its use. You just blew it.
I agree with this. The best conditions
On Feb 12, 2006, at 8:11 AM, Cotty wrote:
SMC A*85mm 1.4 gets treated with the respect it deserves. The
ceremony
that precedes even the opening of the case that holds it takes four
hours and a dozen virgins in goose-down thongs.
So what was the ceremony before you modified its mount?
David Mann wrote:
On Feb 12, 2006, at 7:28 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
I can also understand guys who wouldn't use their best in less than
ideal conditions but suppose you're out without your pristine lens
the opportunity arises that requires its use. You just blew it.
I agree with this.
Paul,
Would be be able to tell me if you know any adapters for mounting
R lenses?
Thanks,
Gautam
On 2/11/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I know the R lenses can be adapted, but Shel was speaking of an M
lens. Lenses designed for use with a bellows or the Visoflex housing
On 2/11/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, Cameraquest does not have something similar. The photo I presented was
of a special 43mm lens made by Pentax in a Leica screw mount.
[snip]
Ah!
Gautam
Hallo,
I own the Super A (with TTL-flash) and the AF280T. The manual of this
camera says: In metered manual mode, speeds slower than 1/125 sec. stay
as are when the dedicated flash recycles. Choosing any slow speed, you
can enjoy existing light photography with flash fill-in.
So when I put
On 2/12/06, David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 12, 2006, at 8:11 AM, Cotty wrote:
SMC A*85mm 1.4 gets treated with the respect it deserves. The
ceremony
that precedes even the opening of the case that holds it takes four
hours and a dozen virgins in goose-down thongs.
So what
Vuescan doesn't need the SCSI drivers for XP.
In my case, the twain driver doesn't work for XP anymore, but Vuescan works
fine, so I can still use my old scanner.
On Thursday 02 February 2006 02:02, Butch Black wrote:
FJW In a message dated 1/31/2006 1:53:24 PM Pacific Standard Time,
FJW [EMAIL
On 11/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
NEW GUY HERE WITH A QUESTION, IS IT CONSIDERED BAD FORM TO OFFER TO OUR
FELLOW PDML'ERS PENTAX EQU THAT I AM SELLING BEFORE I LIST IT ON E-BAY?
I ALSO
HAVE A LENS QUESTION IF I MAY. I CAME INTO OWNERSHIP OF A RIKENON
24-40MM,F2.8
ZOOM.
Posted every Sunday (if Graywolf can remember)
http://www.graywolfphoto.com/pentax/pdml-faq.html
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 11/2/06, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://photo.net/shared/portrait-bits.tcl?user_id=492668
cheers,
frank
That really is the most atrocious picture.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Yes, in a way. If the camera is set to underexpose by three stops - that's
what it will do.
The flash will then try to give enough light for F.8. If you are out doors,
only the closest part of the image will get light enough for f8. The rest
will be under exposed by three stops. In doors (short
On 11/2/06, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Maybe I should shut down my g-mail account...
Are you going to offer it to the list??
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 11/2/06, Cesar, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty,
Dude.
Should I feel honored with the fact that you let me use the 85 while I
was visiting?
The honour was all mine.
:Hmmm, maybe it was because I used it on your camera... I
never thought about trying it out on my cameras...
You have
On 11/2/06, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Please post a picture of the virgins.
Actually having a hard time finding any these days. No three wise men either.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 12/2/06, David Mann, discombobulated, unleashed:
So what was the ceremony before you modified its mount? Must have
been quite a spectacle.
Just a quick dusting down with the goose down thongs ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On 12/2/06, Juan Buhler, discombobulated, unleashed:
It was thirteen virgins then.
Har! Actually, they're not virgins anymore ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 11/2/06, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
You Brits seem to have raised being spanked by a middle aged lady to the
point of religious experience.
WW
Sort of like life in the Robb household, no?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On 11/2/06, Tom C, discombobulated, unleashed:
Most of my words were spent defending myself against misconstruals.
I met misconstruals once. She was nice :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
I've had my head down into working some projects lately and not been
posting many pictures. Been working on a couple of new ideas ...
This photo was taken hand-held with my pocket camera, the Panasonic
LX1. It's an ISO 200 shot, mostly pretty hideously underexposed to
obtain a very rough
I CAME INTO
OWNERSHIP OF A RIKENON 24-40MM,F2.8 ZOOM. AS I HAVE NEVER SEEN
ANOTHER ONE LISTED IN MY 4 YEARS ON EBAY CAN FIND NO INFO ON THE
LENS, GOOD, BAD, OR OTHERWISE,I COULD REALLY USE SOME HELP. IF ANY
OF YOU KNOW WHERE I MITE LOCATE THIS INFO OR KNOW OF THIS LENS
YOURSELF,
Hi all,
I need a batch text tool for adding copyright info to photos.
So far I have been adding text by hand for each photo, but I miss a
convenient tool for batch processing.
I've got Photoshop 5 and Photoshop Elements v 2.
I guess I could write a macro but am thinking that there may already
This one time, at band camp, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$400-500
Kevin
If I thought I'd use it enough I'd get the Sekonic L558.
So taking this to mind, I launched myself at eBay and came up the winner on this
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=7587998373
You should be happy with it.
Dave
On 2/12/06, Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This one time, at band camp, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$400-500
Kevin
If I thought I'd use it enough I'd get the Sekonic L558.
So taking this to mind, I launched myself at eBay and
Check color spaces, monitor calibration (is it honored in Nikon Scan?),
and how big the preview image is in NikonScan. This stuff is tricky at
first, but does sort itself out when you are persistent. What works
best for me is to keep scanner software as stupid as possible and
do virtually all
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 01:42:04 -, Jim King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Manuel Magalhães wrote on Sat, 11 Feb 2006 06:29:41:
Hi guys,
getting out of lurking mode, 'cause I need some help from you. I want
to buy a Konica Minolta dual scan IV, but because of Sony it is getting
more
As many have noted, listing for sale items is fine. I would recommend
against mounting that Rikenon lens on any Pentax camera until you have
more information. Some Rikenon lenses have a pin that drops into a hole
on the Pentax mount, preventing their removal. We once had a member
resort to a
I'm lost here, not quite sure what I'm looking at. A fence with
reflectors? Doesn't do much for me.
Paul
On Feb 12, 2006, at 5:16 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I've had my head down into working some projects lately and not been
posting many pictures. Been working on a couple of new ideas ...
Jens, how do you 'let the flash believe that the ISO setting is higher'?
I've always just stopped down a stop or two from what the flash recommends
and compensated with shutter speed.
I don't believe I've ever seen a flash whose sensor is linked to ISO in
auto mode.
Don
-Original
Thanks Fred,
I've got one around here that needs your surgery.
This method looks much safer to me.
No crumbs in the lens!
Regards, Bob S.
On 2/11/06, Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I've removed the excess K-mount flange collar from a number of
Vivitar Series 1 gems of the 1970's, either
On 12 Feb 2006 at 7:03, Lon Williamson wrote:
Check color spaces, monitor calibration (is it honored in Nikon Scan?),
and how big the preview image is in NikonScan. This stuff is tricky at
first, but does sort itself out when you are persistent.
Nikon Scan 4.0 can utilize custom monitor
On 12 Feb 2006 at 13:27, Lasse Karlsson wrote:
Hi all,
I need a batch text tool for adding copyright info to photos.
So far I have been adding text by hand for each photo, but I miss a
convenient tool for batch processing.
I've got Photoshop 5 and Photoshop Elements v 2.
I guess I could
Hi Fred,
Thanks, that one's a keeper!
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 7:05 PM
Subject: My Latest VS1 Surgery
Well, I've removed the excess K-mount flange collar from a number of
Vivitar Series 1
Works for me, too. There's a slightly surreal aspect to it. What is the
chap standing by the steps up to? He has a somewhat maniacal look to him.
The scene looks as though it should have been lit with gaslights.
John
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:22:53 -, Keith McGuinness
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Parking garage?...
Can you give us a clue what you're trying to do?
...before we savage the effort.
Regards, Bob S.
On 2/12/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm lost here, not quite sure what I'm looking at. A fence with
reflectors? Doesn't do much for me.
Paul
On Feb 12, 2006, at
Amusing. The adults are wearing childish expressions, and vice-versa.
John
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 07:14:33 -, Bruce Dayton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Paul,
My portrait hat donned, this comes across as a fun, before the real
shot, shot. It is kind of fun in a way, but probably not a
Vic,
It's been a while since I've used the Super A, but doesn't it
automatically set a 1/125 speed when you turn the AF280 on?
Regards, Bob S.
On 2/12/06, Vic Mortelmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo,
I own the Super A (with TTL-flash) and the AF280T. The manual of this
camera says: In
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:59:25 -, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- Original Message - From: John Forbes
Subject: Re: The thread that spread. was: Re: PESO: Church Door (we have
a winner) With a
Matron will put some ointment on.
You're right. There's always a
Sorry to hear it. My Memorex 500 MB thumbdrive did the same last
month -- just whimsically died, after about three years of use.
fortunately the price for these things has come down a lot. I
replaced it with a 1GB Lexar, which I hope will last longer.
Joe
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:55:47 -, Steve Larson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Fred,
Thanks, that one's a keeper!
Yes, indeed. Fred, do you have a simple recipe for removing the pin from
Ricoh lenses. Ideally a reversible operation, as the uncertain transexual
said to his surgeon.
On Feb 12, 2006, at 12:19 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NEW GUY HERE WITH A QUESTION, IS IT CONSIDERED BAD FORM TO OFFER
TO OUR
FELLOW PDML'ERS PENTAX EQU THAT I AM SELLING BEFORE I LIST IT ON E-
BAY? I ALSO
HAVE A LENS QUESTION IF I MAY. I CAME INTO OWNERSHIP OF A RIKENON
24-40MM,F2.8
On Feb 12, 2006, at 5:01 AM, Cotty wrote:
We won't be ready to receive guests until the summer. Summer in
England
is a magical time.
Agreed. I have actually managed to be there in the summer a few
times when it wasn't raining.
I used to commute to England when I was publishing a
Good choice, Kevin. You'll love it.
Bob
On Feb 12, 2006, at 6:16 AM, Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$400-500
Kevin
If I thought I'd use it enough I'd get the Sekonic L558.
So taking this to mind, I launched myself at eBay and
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/11/06, Malcolm Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Frank better remember his bunny ears -- otherwise he'd just
fade into the background
Passport photo? Tell me you didn't Frank
Monica lives in New York now, but returns once in a while to play to a
packed crowd.
Reiterating on my Sigma recant, I think my pub dynamic-duo from now on
will be the 77mm LTD and the 20/1.8 Sigma, space permitting. You need to
be able to get close with the 20mm to make it useful, but the
On 2/12/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/2/06, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Maybe I should shut down my g-mail account...
Are you going to offer it to the list?
No.
I've only got 99 invitations left, and you're not getting one of them.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness
I didn't expect to win this, but I don't mind. The lens looks intriguing.
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=7587528629ssPageName=ADME:B:EOIBSA:AU:11
Googling hasn't come up with anything. Does anyone know who Tasmanex is?
It can't be a live firing exercise in the Tasman
Jim King wrote:
Manuel Magalhães wrote on Sat, 11 Feb 2006 06:29:41:
Hi guys,
getting out of lurking mode, 'cause I need some help from you. I want
to buy a Konica Minolta dual scan IV, but because of Sony it is
getting more difficult. In Europe the online shops where I find it
are in
John Forbes wrote:
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 01:42:04 -, Jim King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Manuel Magalhães wrote on Sat, 11 Feb 2006 06:29:41:
Hi guys,
getting out of lurking mode, 'cause I need some help from you. I
want to buy a Konica Minolta dual scan IV, but because of Sony it is
Kinda looks like a block of apartments to me.
I don't mean to be rude, but that looks like something taken with a
camera phone in BW mode.
Dave
On 2/12/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had my head down into working some projects lately and not been
posting many pictures.
On 2/12/06, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Parking garage?...
Can you give us a clue what you're trying to do?
...before we savage the effort.
Regards, Bob
I've already had my say.
:-)
Dave
It looks almost identical to my 500 mm beroflex, probably uses a
Tmount adapter. These lenses are often rebranded, no idea if Beroflex
is the original name but Google has lots of hits with beroflex.
On 2/12/06, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't expect to win this, but I don't mind.
It's a generic Korean telephoto. If you buy a bunch they will
engrave Changmanex on them! Performance is OK. I have one with the
Cambron name on it.
Bob
On Feb 12, 2006, at 8:55 AM, Derby Chang wrote:
I didn't expect to win this, but I don't mind. The lens looks
intriguing.
I suspect that this is one of those pictures that looks great in print,
but not so hot on screen.
John
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:36:43 -, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 2/12/06, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Parking garage?...
Can you give us a clue what you're trying
On Feb 12, 2006, at 9:37 AM, Toine Kuiper wrote:
It looks almost identical to my 500 mm beroflex, probably uses a
Tmount adapter. These lenses are often rebranded, no idea if Beroflex
is the original name but Google has lots of hits with beroflex.
The same lens will be found with a wide
Tasmanex was a company that tried to clean up in the massive Tasmanian
long lens market. They were very successful. After selling two lenses
they reached total market saturation, and had to fold.
John
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:55:32 -, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I didn't
Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't expect to win this, but I don't mind. The lens looks intriguing.
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=7587528629ssPageName=ADME:B:EOIBSA:AU:11
Googling hasn't come up with anything. Does anyone know who Tasmanex is?
It can't be a
LOL
Dave
On 2/12/06, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tasmanex was a company that tried to clean up in the massive Tasmanian
long lens market. They were very successful. After selling two lenses
they reached total market saturation, and had to fold.
John
On Feb 12, 2006, at 9:49 AM, John Forbes wrote:
Tasmanex was a company that tried to clean up in the massive
Tasmanian long lens market. They were very successful. After
selling two lenses they reached total market saturation, and had to
fold.
I heard that they were bedeviled with
On Feb 12, 2006, at 9:55 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
The notorious Cambridge Camera sold one under their Cambron name. I
think a few of the other mail order houses had similar items.
Mine is a Cambron, and isn't notorious at all. It just sits quietly
on a shelf in my studio. BTW, the lens
Bob,
Rochester may be dreary, but you're on the way to the North Kent Marshes,
which are a spectacular wetland/salt marsh habitat, and the setting of the
opening scene of Great Expectations when Pip meets Magwitch in the graveyard
at Cooling.
It's very beautiful, and very important in
I must admit that I most often use this technique when using a Metz flash.
Many Metz flashes have the ISO scale connected to the electronics.
Anyway, it's the oldest trick inthe book: Working the flash at higher ISO
setting than the film, to reduce flash output.
When the AF280T is NOT in
Whitstable's OK, too. The natives are tasty.
John
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:05:51 -, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob,
Rochester may be dreary, but you're on the way to the North Kent Marshes,
which are a spectacular wetland/salt marsh habitat, and the setting of
the
opening scene of
Thanks Jens, makes sense.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 9:06 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Super A and fill-in flash?
I must admit that I most often use this technique when using a Metz flash.
Many
Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 12, 2006, at 9:55 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
The notorious Cambridge Camera sold one under their Cambron name. I
think a few of the other mail order houses had similar items.
Mine is a Cambron, and isn't notorious at all. It just sits quietly
on a
On Feb 12, 2006, at 10:05 AM, Bob W wrote:
Rochester may be dreary, but you're on the way to the North Kent
Marshes,
which are a spectacular wetland/salt marsh habitat, and the setting
of the
opening scene of Great Expectations when Pip meets Magwitch in the
graveyard
at Cooling.
It's
Congratulation, Derby.
The moon shot looks real nice. Probably a nice lens ;-)
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Derby Chang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 12. februar 2006 14:56
Til: Pentax Discuss
Emne: Accidental ebay win
I didn't expect to
I've got one around here that needs your surgery.
This method looks much safer to me.
No crumbs in the lens!
Hi, Bob.
Yes, I think this method (which involves removing just the aluminum collar
assembly for surgery, which makes it very easy to keep any possibility of
aluminum filings out of
Thanks, that one's a keeper!
Hi, Steve. Good! However, I'm hoping that Rob might post a photo of his
flange surgery - his neat procedure makes mine look ~even~ more crude than
it is - g. (His looks like brain surgery performed by a brain surgeon,
while mine looks like brain surgery performed
Thanks, that one's a keeper!
Yes, indeed. Fred, do you have a simple recipe for removing the pin from
Ricoh lenses. Ideally a reversible operation, as the uncertain transexual
said to his surgeon.
No, John, I've never had the opportunity (g) of having to defeat the
dreaded Ricoh pin. Not
Yes, indeed. Nothing's quite like that fresh sea taste trickling down your
throat.
That whole part of Kent is also something of a refuge for bizarre old
customs. The great English photographer Tony Ray-Jones squeezed a lot of
mileage out of it; he took some of his best photos in and around
Yes, I think this method (which involves removing just the aluminum
collar assembly for surgery, [mercifully snipped]
Hmmm... I'm not sure that assembly is the right term to use here, since
it's a one-piece assembly. But I don't have a better word for it at the
moment. Module seems a bit of
There's a way of doing it with TTL flash metering as well, I've done
this with my Metz.
1. Set the camera for the correct ISO for your film. Meter the scene,
and choose your manual aperture and shutter speed (shutter speed has
to be below flash sync speed). Leave the camera in metered manual
Yes, indeed. Fred, do you have a simple recipe for removing the pin from
Ricoh lenses. Ideally a reversible operation, as the uncertain transexual
said to his surgeon.
I've managed to take the flange and Ricoh pin off a couple PK/A-R
lenses. Once inside, it was a tiny screw that held the
Hallo Bob,
the higer spees are automatically reset to 1/125, but the lower speeds
remain!
To all others: thanks for the replies sofar. Seem to hold some good
techniques, which I'll have to think over, before I understand them well...
Groeten,
Vic
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Vic,
It's been a
On Feb 12, 2006, at 6:47 AM, John Forbes wrote:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW6/01.htm
I suspect that this is one of those pictures that looks great in
print, but not so hot on screen.
Yes, thank you for your comment.
What it's a picture of is my apartment building. But that's
Hallo,
I would say: netpbm is exactly what you need, but it may be a bit low-level.
For if you don't know it: it's a (huge) set of command-line tools that
convert/edit/process/analyse images.
Here's the documentation:
http://netpbm.sourceforge.net/doc/
There'se a freeware GNU Image Manupulation Program to work on your
photos. Really great piece of soft with layers and many filters/addons
available + ability to build own filters with convolution matrix
feature. For Windows, MacOSX or Linux.
See it http://www.gimp.org
--
home
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:39:32 -, Cory Papenfuss
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, indeed. Fred, do you have a simple recipe for removing the pin
from Ricoh lenses. Ideally a reversible operation, as the uncertain
transexual said to his surgeon.
I've managed to take the flange and
I have a script which, AFAIK, can be called by an action and used in a
batch process. Unfortunately, I don't know if it can be used with such
early versions of Photoshop and Elements. If interested, let me know
off-list, and I'll send the script to you. One thing, though - it places a
border
Hi Godders,
It's clear to me what you're trying to do. Maybe that's because I've done
similar things with film (often with Kodak's 2475 Recording Film) developed
in Acufine. It's not too important what the structure is, although it
might have been nice to know. I'd like to see the print when
Sheesh! Y'need to be a computer programmer to understand this stuff. I
couldn't even figure out what to download in order to get the program on my
disk, much less how to use it. One thing seems apparent (speaking from
computer-jargon overload and ignorance), this won't run in a batch file
Cory,
Thank you. Can you remember if anything else came adrift when you removed
the flange, or was it very straightforward? From bitter experience, I know
that I'm much better at taking things apart than I am at putting them back
together.
Unfortunately, it depends on the lens from my
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:27:48 +0200, Lasse Karlsson wrote:
I need a batch text tool for adding copyright info to photos.
So far I have been adding text by hand for each photo, but I miss a
convenient tool for batch processing.
I wish the folks who write the firmware for the digital cameras
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 17:00:22 -, Cory Papenfuss
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cory,
Thank you. Can you remember if anything else came adrift when you
removed the flange, or was it very straightforward? From bitter
experience, I know that I'm much better at taking things apart than I
am
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: Batch text tool
Sheesh! Y'need to be a computer programmer to understand this stuff. I
couldn't even figure out what to download in order to get the program on
my
disk, much less how to use it. One thing seems apparent
The script that I use does all that. The only info it needs wrt image size
is the ppi info, and the user determines where the sig should be placed.
Once those parameters are set, it doesn't matter if the image size is
500x300 or 1500 x 3000, the sig always ends up where you wnt it (I like
lower
On Feb 12, 2006, at 10:25 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I was referring to Cambridge Camera being notorious, not the lens :)
(Cambridge doesn't have the best reputation among the mail order
places.)
Oh, really? I hadn't heard. vbeg
Bob
On Feb 12, 2006, at 10:30 AM, Bob W wrote:
That whole part of Kent is also something of a refuge for bizarre old
customs. The great English photographer Tony Ray-Jones squeezed a
lot of
mileage out of it; he took some of his best photos in and around
Rochester.
Interesting. I found the
From: Bob Shell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That whole part of Kent is also something of a refuge for
bizarre old
customs. The great English photographer Tony Ray-Jones
squeezed a lot
of mileage out of it; he took some of his best photos in and around
Rochester.
Interesting.
Thanks Shel.
Godfrey
On Feb 12, 2006, at 8:46 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Godders,
It's clear to me what you're trying to do. Maybe that's because
I've done
similar things with film (often with Kodak's 2475 Recording Film)
developed
in Acufine. It's not too important what the
If you just want to add the info for posting on the web, Porta (free)
will add a watermark automatically when you generate the gallery. You
choose the location on the image and the text to be added.
http://www.stegmann.dk/mikkel/porta/
-P
Lasse Karlsson wrote:
Hi all,
I
Do you mean put a copyright attribution into the image, or do you
mean add IPTC metadata with copyright information?
For the former, I use a script that I designed for Photoshop CS2. It
adds a text layer with drop shadow, presenting the copyright data, as
seen in the lower corner of this
Last I looked, it only supported [EMAIL PROTECTED] data, which pretty much
makes it useless for my needs.
Godfrey
On Feb 12, 2006, at 7:15 AM, Roman wrote:
There'se a freeware GNU Image Manupulation Program to work on your
photos. Really great piece of soft with layers and many filters/
Don't know much about batch text tools but nice shot!
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/large/37O-half.jpg
Tom C.
that it has discontinued all those lenses that we already knew
were discontinued:
http://theonlinephotographer.blogspot.com/
Joe
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 18:41:45 -, Joseph Tainter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that it has discontinued all those lenses that we already knew were
discontinued:
http://theonlinephotographer.blogspot.com/
Joe
As ever, it is the omissions that are more interesting, and I am pleased
to see
http://theonlinephotographer.blogspot.com/
P.S. Here's what I just posted on Dpreview:
Understanding Pentax management is a little like understanding
the North Korean leadership. It is smoke, mirrors, and
misdirection -- when they bother to announce anything at all.
Here's what I suspect is
1 - 100 of 223 matches
Mail list logo
