Tomasz Machnik wrote:
Marek is a long time Pentax user, the patience of a saint comes with it :)
Oh man... I'm gonna frame that one!
David J Brooks wrote:
After private emails with Fred, i'v pretty much talked myself into
trying an Epson printer.The R220 seems adaqate for BW prints with 3rd
party black ink(s). More so than my Canon which displays the green
tint Fred mentioned he had, and sems to have gone in the R220.
So does that mean it's permanent and that no one knows where they come from?
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: Why dustproblems ? (WasRE: *ist D vs DS2, some questions)
Date: Thu Mar 30, 2006 11:13 am
Size: 2K
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
I
John Francis wrote:
I'd have thought this article (linked off the page below) was a lot more
relevant to us photographers (or is that image capture technicians? :-)
http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=184401030
Somehow the phrase tinfoil hat comes to mind...
It depends what kind of shooting your doing and aperture also. I can have a
dirty sensor and see it glaringly in some shots while in others it's totally
undetectable. I find it most noticeable in shots with lots of sky or water.
Large expanses of lighter tones against which the dust shows
On 3/29/06, Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but, but, I thought that since they are in digital form, the photos
are =already= ruined...
I ~knew~ it!!
-frank
g
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David J Brooks wrote:
Poping in late on this one.
Does that mean you're going to be pontificating?
That's theologically possible.
...if you follow the PDML religiously.
Cotty wrote:
Poping in late on this one.
Does that mean you're going to be pontificating?
I see.
Careful. You don't want to break one of the cardinal rules of the list
here.
It's the old innuendo thing. (proven effective, sadly)
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does it not seem curious that the article doesn't mention what
damage Kodak
is allegedly doing to their customer's files? I read the article
twice and
I just hope his monolog won't be ROME ing all over the place.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why dustproblems ? (WasRE: *ist D vs DS2, some questions)
That's theologically possible.
-- Original message --
Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty wrote:
Poping in late on this one.
Does that mean you're going to be pontificating?
I see.
Careful. You don't want to break one of the cardinal rules of the list
here.
oh, God not again!
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
Poping in late on this one.
Does that mean you're going to be pontificating?
That's theologically possible.
...if you follow the PDML religiously.
Even with a canon.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Poping in late on this one.
Does that mean you're going to be pontificating?
I see.
Careful. You don't want to break one of the cardinal rules of the list
here.
Don't make me cross.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Cardinal rules? That's a bunch of Bull.
Tom C.
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Why dustproblems ? (WasRE: *ist D vs DS2, some questions)
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 11:33:45 -0500
Cotty wrote:
Poping in late
Samsung say the are competing in visual information field of 'Digital
Network' B technology
Any idea of what does that mean?
Dario
Poping in late on this one.
Does that mean you're going to be pontificating?
I see.
Careful. You don't want to break one of the cardinal rules of the list
here.
oh, God not again!
Yeah, come papal, leave it alone!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
The aspects of producing the image I enjoy the most -
+ composition (outdoor)
+ processing - due to the almost absolute control I personally have over the
process.
+ production - printing (digital) due to the control factor again.
The anticipation while traveling to a (known subject) site is
Very nice! I like it as is. Quite unique with all the dew (I presume).
Tom C.
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO - A bug in the field
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 20:24:59 -0500
Check out
This will probably leave some people on the list cross.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why dustproblems ? (WasRE: *ist D vs DS2, some questions)
Poping in late on this one.
Does that mean you're going to be pontificating?
Quoting Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
David J Brooks wrote:
After private emails with Fred, i'v pretty much talked myself into
trying an Epson printer.The R220 seems adaqate for BW prints with
3rd party black ink(s). More so than my Canon which displays the
green tint Fred mentioned he had,
Rick and Lucas,
Thanks for the replies. I noticed that in the reviews
that the istD did not sound the same. And that the
tests were done in a very empty sounding room. (a lab
maybe?) The review tests are really frame rate tests
against the std C/N cameras. I agree that my film
slrs are louder
I just purchased one a few weeks ago. Very happy with it. Mostly B+W
printing with a few color images, all with Epson inks. I bought it hoping it
would at least be as good as my Epson Stylus Photo - bought about 9 years
ago. So far the 4X6 prints I've done with it are better. I have prints
Another brilliant showing but I do have three equal favourites:
Missing the show - Dan Matyola
Jumble of floats - Harald Rust
It's cleaning time - Boris Liberman
Thanks for cheering my day up!
Malcolm
Poping in late on this one.
Does that mean you're going to be pontificating?
That's theologically possible.
...if you follow the PDML religiously.
Even with a canon.
This will probably leave some people on the list cross.
I just hope his monolog
Cotty wrote:
Poping in late on this one.
Does that mean you're going to be pontificating?
That's theologically possible.
...if you follow the PDML religiously.
Even with a canon.
...using Pentax lenses that have been altared to fit.
Others on the list compared the photos I presented of the DS mirror
box and the D mirror box. There is a structural difference and,
playing with the two cameras in the shop, they have a different
timbre to the noise they make.
I sometimes think the DS makes a loud and clattery sound, but
Midwest has a Canon-brand FD-mount 100/2.8 for around $100.
Cotty? Need one? : )
Collin
KC8TKA
Hi!
Another brilliant showing but I do have three equal favourites:
Missing the show - Dan Matyola
Jumble of floats - Harald Rust
It's cleaning time - Boris Liberman
Malcolm, thank you so much. I am humbled.
--
Boris
Godfrey,
IMO, better the man who hasn't studied all these things
and doesn't have to doubt his eyes when he opens them
in the morning.
Anyway, so much for all that.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 3/29/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 29, 2006, at 8:19 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Sad in
A few days ago I was in my favorite tea house in which there's a small,
horseshoe-shaped counter around which a few people, including myself, were
sitting. I fired off a few shots with the DS and no one around the counter
seemed to hear or take notice. It was surprising how unobtrusive the
Congratulations! I like that focal length. Have
enjoyed using my M*300/4 for a while now.
--- Jay Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At least to me it is major!
I've bee reading about all over for this great
lens. After losing
out on one in an eBay auction a few months back by
being too
Funny, I was just thinking the same thing. I'm looking all over for
dust spots (look like your example) and only seeing some bad pixels -
which would show up in almost every frame.
--
Bruce
Thursday, March 30, 2006, 6:02:12 AM, you wrote:
RS On 30 Mar 2006 at 8:46, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Bailing out.
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:05:46 -0800
The schmuck tells you all that he deliberately tried to insult me, I
responded with something funny, and I'm the bad guy. The
Thanks for that input Ken.
I was looking for something that could do BW better than the S800
Canon, and for the price, this one seems to fit the bill.
Althought its not to say i won't do colour with it.
Its the same up here. Printer is worth the cartridges.:-)
Dave
Quoting Kenneth Waller
Rob Studdert wrote on 30.03.06 14:58:
I tend to use my FA* 200/2.8 mostly because it's in my standard travel kit,
the
A* 200/4 macro is pretty much a special purpose lens for me though I agree it
can easily double up as a standard long lens. My only concern in doing that is
that its bokeh
Mark Roberts wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adam Maas wrote:
Oops, brain fart. Of course, some Radials were Rotaries, back in WW1
days (Fixed crank, spinning cylinders, prop attached to the block).
I've heard about those. How did they wire the spark plugs
This has been on my mind for a while.
A TIFF made from a DSLR exposure is generally (always?) 8-bits. It's been
adjusted in the camera and has been described as just a huge JPEG as far as
results go. Camera generated TIFFs are huge. The TIFF generated by my
4mpx Sony is 11+ mbs.
RAW files are
On 3/29/06, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd have thought this article (linked off the page below) was a lot more
relevant to us photographers (or is that image capture technicians? :-)
http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=184401030
His quotes were taken
That was another joke, Tim. Zeppelins were filled with Hydrogen. Plus
a pun on the use of heat to melt le(a)d. My obtuse sense of humour.
_My_ apologies.
Tim Øsleby wrote:
Some time I am. But it's not intentional. I simply get carried away, but I
do understand it can be tiresome
At 08:29 AM 30/03/2006 , Aaron wrote:
So does that mean it's permanent and that no one knows where they come from?
Sensor was made that way. Most hot pixels are mapped out in the firmware
but a few week/hotter pixels tend to sneak through and show up with longer
exposures and higher ISO's.
On 3/27/06, cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since the show is all Digital this year and I don't have a portable
computer...Can I assume there will be ample PC availability among us to look
at some photos and make a CD? Or do I need to start priming the Mistress
of Finance to work on laptop
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
This has been on my mind for a while.
A TIFF made from a DSLR exposure is generally (always?) 8-bits. It's been
adjusted in the camera and has been described as just a huge JPEG as far as
results go. Camera generated TIFFs are huge. The TIFF generated by my
4mpx Sony is
Hi!
Company called Pentar (Pentax representative in Russia) had a photo
competition. The topic was Spring. The genre was macro.
I submitted this work:
http://www.penta-club.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=6267
And... won the competition!
Special thanks goes to Joe Wilensky who enabled me with
TIFF is essentially a container format only defining the wrapper around
the actual data, but there is a 'standard' format for 8 or 16bit image
data inside which is extremely inefficient. RAW files typically use the
container format, but lack a lot of the extra baggage of the internal
image
On 3/30/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Company called Pentar (Pentax representative in Russia) had a photo
competition. The topic was Spring. The genre was macro.
I submitted this work:
http://www.penta-club.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=6267
And... won the competition!
On 3/30/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Company called Pentar (Pentax representative in Russia) had a photo
competition. The topic was Spring. The genre was macro.
I submitted this work:
http://www.penta-club.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=6267
And... won the competition!
At 10:33 AM 30/03/2006 , you wrote:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
This has been on my mind for a while.
A TIFF made from a DSLR exposure is generally (always?) 8-bits. It's been
adjusted in the camera and has been described as just a huge JPEG as far as
results go. Camera generated TIFFs are huge.
RAW files are the raw sensor data. That is, one 12 bit number per
pixel, where each pixel only has red, green or blue info, according to
the Bayer pattern of the sensor.
Tiff files are RGB. So even if they are 8 bit, they are in fact 24
bits per pixel.
j
On 3/30/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL
I submitted this work:
http://www.penta-club.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=6267
And... won the competition!
--
Boris
Congrats! Nice Lady-bug/bird.
Powell
Boris Liberman wrote:
Company called Pentar (Pentax representative in Russia) had a photo
competition. The topic was Spring. The genre was macro.
I submitted this work:
http://www.penta-club.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=6267
And... won the competition!
Congratulations!
The competition never
Last time I was in Edinburgh, I took my picture with this big statue of
Hume. I'm going back in early April and I'll get a digital version.
I'll even get one slightly out of focus for you, Frank.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
Good picture, Boris. Congratulations.
John
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 19:32:27 +0100, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi!
Company called Pentar (Pentax representative in Russia) had a photo
competition. The topic was Spring. The genre was macro.
I submitted this work:
Excellent. I think it's time to stop giving him hints guys. ;-)
Nice work.
Tom C.
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: First success
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 20:32:27 +0200
Hi!
Company called Pentar (Pentax
Good for you, Boris.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Boris Liberman
I submitted this work:
http://www.penta-club.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=6267
And... won the competition!
On 3/30/06, Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last time I was in Edinburgh, I took my picture with this big statue of
Hume. I'm going back in early April and I'll get a digital version.
I'll even get one slightly out of focus for you, Frank.
Yeah,
Tilt it a bit, too...
LOL
cheers,
Hi Cotty,
is it possible to convert the lens to PKA fit?
Thanks,
Manuel
-Mensagem original-
De: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada: quarta-feira, 29 de Março de 2006 23:17
Para: pentax list
Assunto: Re: Enablement
On 29/3/06, Sylwester Pietrzyk, discombobulated, unleashed:
And
Excellent shot! Congratulations on your win.
Paul
[Original Message]
From: Boris Liberman
I submitted this work:
http://www.penta-club.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=6267
And... won the competition!
Hi!
Excellent. I think it's time to stop giving him hints guys. ;-)
Nice work.
Thanks Tom, but really, if you ain't no giving me any hints, I'm gonna
respond in the same manner... ;-)
--
Boris
Congratulations Boris. I'm happy for you.
This news made me smile, seriously.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Boris
[Original Message]
From: Boris Liberman
I submitted this work:
http://www.penta-club.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=6267
And... won the competition!
ochen horrorshow!
Bob
Excellent work, Boris!
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Company called Pentar (Pentax representative in Russia) had a photo
competition. The topic was Spring. The genre was macro.
I submitted this work:
http://www.penta-club.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=6267
And... won the competition!
Special
Don't forget Mill either.
--
Cheers,
Bob
As I was commuting home last night, I realized that I forgot
to mention one of my favourite philosophers, David Hume. Now
as I peruse my list, I notice that I didn't mention any of
the British Empiricists, so if I'm going to mention Hume, I
Congratulations, Boris!
Godfrey
On Mar 30, 2006, at 10:32 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Company called Pentar (Pentax representative in Russia) had a photo
competition. The topic was Spring. The genre was macro.
I submitted this work:
http://www.penta-club.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=6267
Congratulations!
I´m sure that Tampon 90/2.5 is a great lens ;-)
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 9:32 PM
On 30/3/06, Manuel Magalhães, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hi Cotty,
is it possible to convert the lens to PKA fit?
Thanks,
Manuel
That's an interesting one. I would say yes - and no.
The register distance (distance between film/sensor plane and back of
lens is 44mm on the Canon. On Pentax
On 30/3/06, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
I submitted this work:
http://www.penta-club.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=6267
And... won the competition!
Special thanks goes to Joe Wilensky who enabled me with Tamron 90/2.5
SP macro that was used in this shot.
What, they don't have
Congrats! That's a great picture... what did you win by the way? I
hope something very nice and expensive.
On 30/3/06, Raimo K, discombobulated, unleashed:
Congratulations!
I´m sure that Tampon 90/2.5 is a great lens ;-)
It's a great lens for periodicals.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
LOL... does it have wings?
Tom C.
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: First success
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 20:45:22 +0100
On 30/3/06, Raimo K, discombobulated, unleashed:
Congratulations!
I´m sure that Tampon
On 30/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Midwest has a Canon-brand FD-mount 100/2.8 for around $100.
Cotty? Need one? : )
No thanks Collin. I don't shoot film for now, but if I ever pick it up
again, I have some Pentax cameras I'd rather use!
Cheers,
Cotty
Poping in late on this one.
Does that mean you're going to be pontificating?
That's theologically possible.
...if you follow the PDML religiously.
Even with a canon.
...using Pentax lenses that have been altared to fit.
This is true, I confess.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
Congratulations!
I´m sure that Tampon 90/2.5 is a great lens ;-)
It's a great lens for periodicals.
LOL... does it have wings?
Yes. Used a lot on men's trail cycle.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
But, Keith, look at the opportunities:
http://mat.gsia.cmu.edu/POB/DEC0998/0519.html
Kostas (Si hoc signum legere potes, operis boni in rebus Latinus
alacribus et fructuosis potiri potes!)
That's an interesting site, Kostas! g
They left out Cotty's favourite:
Heia!
Great photo, Boris!
One neat feature is that it works as either a
horizontal or vertical!
Rick
--- Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Company called Pentar (Pentax representative in
Russia) had a photo
competition. The topic was Spring. The genre was
macro.
I submitted this
Rick Womer wrote:
Compared to my PZ-1, PZ-1p, and (especially) Super
Programs, the istD shutter noise is a whisper.
And as to the LX ... much as I love my LX ...
Kenneth Waller wrote:
This will probably leave some people on the list cross.
not another one of those excruciating pun threads
Congratulations, Boris, you nailed that bug!
Only thing is, so caught in the moment, it looks somewhat - static...
SCNR,
Pancho
Boris Liberman schrieb:
Hi!
Company called Pentar (Pentax representative in Russia) had a photo
competition. The topic was Spring. The genre was macro.
I
Poping in late on this one.
Does that mean you're going to be pontificating?
That's theologically possible.
...if you follow the PDML religiously.
Even with a canon.
...using Pentax lenses that have been altared to fit.
This is true, I confess.
Bull.
Unfortunately, shooting RAW is just not an option because of how quickly I need
to turn over jpegs.
But am I right in thinking that if I am not seeing them now they will not
develop later?
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Powell Hargrave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: Why dustproblems
Dave, I have a R200 which I believe uses the same ink carts. I have
notice that my prints granulate a bit over time (months, not years).
They look pretty good in normal light, but viewed under unrelenting
light they are pretty grainy looking. Now that may be due to my not
using the correct
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, Steve Desjardins wrote:
Last time I was in Edinburgh, I took my picture with this big statue of
Hume. I'm going back in early April and I'll get a digital version.
I'll even get one slightly out of focus for you, Frank.
Hi Steve,
Please drop me a line if you want to
One other thing to think about, the Epson uses the same printhead for
all printing, so changing back and forth between color inks and BW is
going to require a very through printhead cleaning. In fact being as the
printers are so cheap it might be better (more econonical) to use
separate
Oh Oh.
Just ordered it and the Eboni inks.
Well i will be giving a work out and i'll hang one in the sun room as i
didi my Canon print when i bought it.
I still have the S800 for starters.
Dave
Quoting graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dave, I have a R200 which I believe uses the same ink
Congradulations.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Company called Pentar (Pentax representative in Russia) had a photo
competition. The topic was Spring. The
One sad word my friend.
Salary.
When the game on Saturday went into overtime, the fellow next to me muttered
the oft' used phrase free Basketball. I told him I'd been over forty
hours (normal work week)since Wednesday. ALL the basketball was free.
CW
took both kids to the dentist today.
I will most likely do that Tom.:-)
Dave
Quoting graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
One other thing to think about, the Epson uses the same printhead for
all printing, so changing back and forth between color inks and BW
is going to require a very through printhead cleaning. In fact being
as the
Cotty wrote:
On 30/3/06, Raimo K, discombobulated, unleashed:
Congratulations!
I´m sure that Tampon 90/2.5 is a great lens ;-)
It's a great lens for periodicals.
Cheers,
Cotty
Whew! That's your best one for sometime, Cot!
keith
I went for a walk with our Border Collie last weekend. It's rare she goes
on a walk with just me and without our other dog (the alpha). Anyway...
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4279519
Congratulations Boris. A fine pic indeed.
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Company called Pentar (Pentax representative in Russia) had a photo
competition. The topic was Spring. The genre was macro.
I submitted this work:
http://www.penta-club.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=6267
And... won the
Congrats!
On 3/30/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Company called Pentar (Pentax representative in Russia) had a photo
competition. The topic was Spring. The genre was macro.
I submitted this work:
http://www.penta-club.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=6267
And... won the
Check out the link. Look at the hikers on the mountain's ridge.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.equipment.large-format/browse_frm/thread/1ce1471b125dc7d9/31020ee691ea0e6f?hl=en#31020ee691ea0e6f
And given some recent ng discussion, many seem to be scanning
Pretty dog. Nice shot. On my work monitor, which is only roughly calibrated, it
seems to lack shadow detail in that the eyes don't separate out from the hair
very well. A little tweak of black level might be called for, but I can't say
for sure with this monitor. In any case, a good grab.
Paul
E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And as to the LX ... much as I love my LX ...
Now that you say so, is it correct that the shutter noise/mirror slap of
my LX is way stronger than that of my MX?
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage:
Interesting. So hot pixels show as a sharp spot with a hot frige and
dust shows as and out of focus spot? Makes sense to me once I think
about it.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
[EMAIL
Congratulations, Boris!
Godfrey
On Mar 30, 2006, at 10:32 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Company called Pentar (Pentax representative in Russia) had a photo
competition. The topic was Spring. The genre was macro.
I submitted this work:
http://www.penta-club.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=6267
Congrats, love the photo.
On 3/30/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Company called Pentar (Pentax representative in Russia) had a photo
competition. The topic was Spring. The genre was macro.
I submitted this work:
http://www.penta-club.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=6267
Nice shot! It really shows her off well.
--
Bruce
Thursday, March 30, 2006, 12:36:52 PM, you wrote:
TC I went for a walk with our Border Collie last weekend. It's rare she goes
TC on a walk with just me and without our other dog (the alpha). Anyway...
TC
Add mine to the chorus of congratulations! It really feels good to
get recongnized like that. Nice going.
--
Bruce
Thursday, March 30, 2006, 10:32:27 AM, you wrote:
BL Hi!
BL Company called Pentar (Pentax representative in Russia) had a photo
BL competition. The topic was Spring. The genre
Generally speaking they don't get worse. Some pixels may be weaker
than others and show up at high ISO and/or long exposures. If you
aren't seeing it with your camera and settings, then you probably
won't in the future.
Seems like I remember somewhere a plug or action or something that
could
Very clishéish. The Latin name is Phalacrocorax Artistotelis.
WARNING! This link is not suitable for cormorant haters.
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=228023
*istDS, raw 400 ISO, Av, -1.0EV, Tokina AT-X 150-500/5,6 and Pentax AF1.7x,
500mm x 1.7, f:11, 1/500s.
Tripod,
101 - 200 of 253 matches
Mail list logo
