You wouldn't believe how red some of those roses are. Fresh blood is
about as close a comparison as I can offer. If you looked at the full
gallery -- after I added more pictures on Friday -- did you notice the
four odd ones?
Don
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Don,
Very nice flower photos.
All the
No - the new DA lenses have this feature. In fact it's even
easier than the old FA lenses; there's no need to move any
switch to AF mode (just move the focus ring). Canon have
had this for some time - it's referred to as full-time
manual focus (or touch-up).
Oh, and another thing - the K10D is
Ha. Love it.
They're valves of some description. But I gotta' ask, why do they have
coats? :-)
Dave
On 7/15/06, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps a bit lighthearted - didn't see the resemblance until viewing
on a bigger screen.
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 200, 1/1000
Adam,
WMP doesn't work at all in playing DVD's on my PC (while it is capable to
play mpegs).
That's the reason for suspecting some extra piece of software is needed, and
I asked for that.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Sunday 16 July 2006 08:40, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Adam,
WMP doesn't work at all in playing DVD's on my PC (while it is capable to
play mpegs).
That's the reason for suspecting some extra piece of software is needed,
and I asked for that.
Dario
Hi,
Try videolan client (vlc) from
Hi Jason,
It works very well, and I'm more than happy wiith it. Thanks a lot!
Cheers,
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2006 9:50 AM
Subject: Re: OT - Advice on free DVD playback software
On
Gave me a good chuckle, Bruce.
Thanks for sharing.
Jostein
On 7/15/06, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps a bit lighthearted - didn't see the resemblance until viewing
on a bigger screen.
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 200, 1/1000 sec @ f/6.7
William Robb wrote:
I tend to eschew the whole street photography thing in the same way I eschew
jazz music.
I don't get it, and I don't really feel the need to, either.
Mark!!!
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I've used extra canvas before, sometimes when straightening a tilted
photo or when just needing a little extra breathing room along an edge or
two, but I never tried adding and removing something as done in this case.
I'm not sure if the small size of the image made it easier or more
difficult to
Shel,
My impression is that it doesn't get more difficult with larger
images, and not more tedious either. After all it's just a matter of
brush size. What always happens to me, though, is that with larger
images i start paying more attention to minute detail, and that's when
the workload builds
Hi guys and gals,
4 days to go to the next deadline.
Submission form is up and running again. Still at
http://www.oksne.net/autopug/pugform.asp
Cheers,
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Hi,
how does Capture One LE compare with ACR? I don't have PS CS2 (yet?)
as I'm still looking at the various options that are available. So I
haven't used ACR, but I have downloaded the trial version of Capture
One LE and it seems at first glance to be pretty good.
One thing I don't much like
On Jul 16, 2006, at 12:00 AM, David Savage wrote:
Don't forget your wide brimmed hat either ;-)
Sadly, I don't have one that will fit on my gigantic head.
-Aaron
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Don,
I just gave the whole gallery another look.
I don't know what you mean by the four odd ones?
Regards, Bob S.
On 7/16/06, Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You wouldn't believe how red some of those roses are. Fresh blood is
about as close a comparison as I can offer. If you looked at
On Jul 16, 2006, at 12:42 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
But that's not a 10MP body, is it?
Hi Jens -- the K10D (not the K110D) is a 10MP body. It is a higher-end
machine than the current offerings. You'd probably want it if you
played with it. It'll be out in the fall.
The clutch I played with
Jack,
Now that you've photoshopped that bail on the bottom,
how about fixing the bale on the left edge of the frame.
You know it's kind of distracting too. ;-)
Regards, Bob S.
On 7/15/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Removed the lower right bale that Marnie pointed out as being
It looks good. Nice work.
Paul
On Jul 15, 2006, at 5:56 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Removed the lower right bale that Marnie pointed out as being
distracting.
With Paul's encouragement, I removed the bale and, now, I wish someone
had spoken up sooner. (all I need is courage)
I think it's better.
Adobe Camera Raw does not work on TIFF files either. No RAW converter
does.
Vuescan's TIFF RAW files are fundamentally different from digital
camera RAW files in that they are already RGB files, they simply
haven't been gamma corrected and color adjusted/inverted for film
characteristics.
On 7/16/06, Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 16, 2006, at 12:00 AM, David Savage wrote:
Don't forget your wide brimmed hat either ;-)
Sadly, I don't have one that will fit on my gigantic head.
LOL.
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
In a message dated 7/15/2006 3:04:30 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Removed the lower right bale that Marnie pointed out as being
distracting.
With Paul's encouragement, I removed the bale and, now, I wish someone
had spoken up sooner. (all I need is courage)
I think it's
Paul,
Did you happen to see my post Harvest Shower per Marnie?
I removed the lower right bale.
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent. Very good work. It's quite easy, isn't it? And it can
save a poorly framed photo. I also use this technique to eliminate
elements I
There are, also, a couple bales that could be repositioned, but I want
to keep that tension as some term it. :)
Jack
--- Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack,
Now that you've photoshopped that bail on the bottom,
how about fixing the bale on the left edge of the frame.
You know it's
On 15/7/06, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.web-options.com/P7150791s.jpg
My God, it's Cotty!
Cheeky barsteward.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
Marnie,
I gave you heading credit for pointing out the offending bale. Made
this shot in about 1982 and the bale arrangement had long since been
accepted.
Like your Big Barn. I downloaded and tried leveling it, but lost the
top of the hill. Not good. Perhaps could be done with an enlarged
canvas.
In a message dated 7/16/2006 6:52:06 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marnie,
I gave you heading credit for pointing out the offending bale. Made
this shot in about 1982 and the bale arrangement had long since been
accepted.
Like your Big Barn. I downloaded and tried leveling
In a message dated 7/15/2006 7:04:59 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all,
Any advice for a good (and possibly free) DVD playback software for XP? I
need no special feature, only plain reliable DVD player leaving your PC
alive. Tucows has a lot of them, but... which one
In a message dated 7/15/2006 1:39:25 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
... a sleep
Full of sweet dreams, and health, and quiet breathing
(John Keats)
http://www.web-options.com/P7150791s.jpg
Bob
==
I'd crop closer to his feet and turn down the contrast just a tad.
Other
I just pulled the trigger on this. Can't wait to get it. Thanks again
for all the help!
Amita
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 7/15/2006 7:26:59 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Interesting, in a macabre way. Bad light, but the victim is fully
exposed. I generally pass on these shots. They're easy, but cruel in
a way. If the shot is truly artful with fantastic light and an
In a message dated 7/15/2006 1:39:51 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
writes:
I remember AnnSan was asking about website hosting pictures
with mating bugs.
Did somebody submit pictures to this or any similar site?
http://www.whatsthatbug.com/love_among_bugs.html
I had a chance to
Aaron (or others) - do you know (or could you tell from the body base
plate) if the K10D is planned to have an add-on battery grip like the
*ist-D?
Stan
On Jul 16, 2006, at 7:19 AM, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Jul 16, 2006, at 12:42 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
But that's not a 10MP body, is it?
In a message dated 7/7/2006 11:20:02 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On July 1 - the local kite club held their Red, White and Blue Festival.
Here's a link to a few photos from the event:
http://georgesphotos.net/gallery/1638381
This is a friendly bunch of guys. They had
I wonder the same thing. Though I've never seen a shot of the K10D's base plate.
Dave
On 7/16/06, Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron (or others) - do you know (or could you tell from the body base
plate) if the K10D is planned to have an add-on battery grip like the
*ist-D?
Stan
--
In a message dated 7/5/2006 12:05:57 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Some photos from the 4th:
http://neovenator.livejournal.com/106360.html
John Celio
Nice shots!
Very 4th of Julyish.
Gee, batting eyelashes, I wish my camera could do that too.
Sorry, had fun
Marnie's barn (with it's front in shadow) reminded me of this.
Mamiya 6 w/50mm f/4.1L.
Location: Yuba County, Northern California.
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=132
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the
No ... it's a RAW converter and TIFF files are not RAW files. The
advantage of ACR is that it's integrated into PS, so it's not as though
you're using two different programs, but different modules of the same
program. The user interface with ACR and PS is very similar, and, at least
from my POV,
Pervert!
;-)
Dave
On 7/16/06, Igor Roshchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I remember AnnSan was asking about website hosting pictures
with mating bugs.
Did somebody submit pictures to this or any similar site?
http://www.whatsthatbug.com/love_among_bugs.html
I had a chance to take a picture
In a message dated 7/10/2006 8:29:58 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now, for something different from me.
Taken last Tuesday at our 4th of July celebration.
http://www.alphoto.com/070406/page1.htm
enjoy,
Doug
Now that I am ready to look at GESOs, yours no longer
David Savage wrote:
On 7/16/06, Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron (or others) - do you know (or could you tell from the body base
plate) if the K10D is planned to have an add-on battery grip like the
*ist-D?
I wonder the same thing. Though I've never seen a shot of the K10D's base
In a message dated 7/7/2006 6:03:52 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As you guys know, Nate and I went to Austin last weekend. Sadly, we
didn't get to meet Gonz, but we did spend a very pleasant couple of
hours with John Munro and his wife over breakfast. They are great
people
It could, if you used a Pentax LOL
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://neovenator.livejournal.com/106360.html
Gee, batting eyelashes, I wish my camera could do that too.
Sorry, had fun reading blog responses.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Good to know.
Would be sweet if uses the D-BG1, though I'm not holding my breath on that.
Dave
On 7/16/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Savage wrote:
I wonder the same thing. Though I've never seen a shot of the K10D's base
plate.
Rumor mill says it *will* have an
I'll second that for the umpteenth time only because I know there are those
here who have not read the book and who complain about the extra time and
difficulty involved in processing RAW files. And, for those using PS CS,
there's Real World Camera RAW with Photoshop CS.
Shel
[Original
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Jul 16, 2006, at 12:42 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
But that's not a 10MP body, is it?
Hi Jens -- the K10D (not the K110D) is a 10MP body. It is a higher-end
machine than the current offerings. You'd probably want it if you
played with it. It'll be out in the
In a message dated 7/2/2006 12:55:42 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj/index.htm
Just some fun shots to share.
Comments welcome
Enjoiy
Dave
Looks like fun. If you ever print or anything, though, you ought to adjust
Just head up north a couple of counties - Santa Rosa, Petaluma, Mendocino.
Now that you can, make a nice day trip or an over night out of it. The
Mendo fair in Anderson Valley is my favorite - a real Old Tyme County Fair
in a wonderful setting. It's been a while since I've attended, but even
for
On Jul 16, 2006, at 10:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that I am ready to look at GESOs, yours no longer seems to be
there.
Bummer.
Marnie ;-)
Yup. Figured if it was that bad, I didn't want innocent surfers to
get snared on it.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Well get this Jack. I love both Velvia and Reala. That's kinda perverse,
huh? I guess I can see the good in both.
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Fuji Superia Realia 100
I've been thinking about it, and would probably wait a bit until the early
adapters use the camera and report on it, and if it looked good, would wait
for the price to come down a bit. It would be great if there were more
information about it now.
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I intend to buy it. In fact, I browsed through it in Foyles today,
along with a couple of other Raw books. I didn't buy it today because
it was the CS, not CS2, version. Probably doesn't make much
difference, but I'd like to have matching versions.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
In a way, all photography is voyeurism.
[...]
Refusing to photograph the homeless and otherwise, would on
the flip side,
would be like denying their very existence. Which could be
considered a form of
denial.
[...]
But, definitely, looking at pictures of the homeless and down
The short answer would be: It depends.
There are so many choices and compromises in any image that one set
solution does not fit all.
I guess the fix would be to try the shot with different framing/DOF/
etc and then choose the one you like best in the editing stage.
Doug
On Jul 15, 2006, at
Makes a ~big~ difference. The CS version doesn't cover Bridge, which is a
major difference between CS and CS2. Plus there are different features in
the ACR converter - more features in the CS2 versions.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bob W
I intend to buy it. In fact, I browsed through
Godfrey and anyone else,
I've been sorely tempted to try out Aperture for my Mac at home, as
it looks to be a pretty good program. Have any of you run it through
any sort of testing?
thanks,
Doug
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Ah! Good job I didn't buy it then! Ta.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff
Sent: 16 July 2006 17:39
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: RAW workflow
Makes a ~big~ difference. The CS version
I think bales look too modern. You should turn them into sheaves. And
where are the peasants? It would be the work of a few seconds to cut
'n' paste these two in there:
http://www.barbizon-france.com/english/Pages/Barbizon/peintur/jfmill/a
ng2.html
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
I've played with it. The interface is superb, the RAW conversion quality
is so-so and it uses the same obtuse backend format as iPhoto, only
permits one library on one drive, doesn't allow for offline storage and
has no provisions for an adequate backup strategy beyond simply cloning
the
Doug Brewer wrote:
Godfrey and anyone else,
I've been sorely tempted to try out Aperture for my Mac at home, as
it looks to be a pretty good program. Have any of you run it through
any sort of testing?
thanks,
Doug
I've used it on and off in the original version (1.0) and a
In a message dated 7/16/2006 9:46:25 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think bales look too modern. You should turn them into sheaves. And
where are the peasants? It would be the work of a few seconds to cut
'n' paste these two in there:
Had an opportunity to shoot a local band for their first concert in 3
years. Funny thing was, I walked away from the show just kicking
myself that I hadn't gotten any halfway-decent shots at all. I
figured maybe 5-10 acceptable images would turn out if I was lucky.
The shooting was
I just walked into my Apple store one day a couple of months ago, fired
up one of the G5's with a large display attached, downloaded some RAW
images I had put onto a CD, and played to my heart's content. No need
to wait for a official demo. A guy wandered over to ask if I wanted
help, I said
Incredible. I paid 41 GBP for mine - about three times as mcuh (incl.
shipping). It's a great lens, BTW.
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Don
URL produces file not found.
Just as well, first thing you know someone will right a song about
bringing in the sheaves.
Jack
--- Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think bales look too modern. You should turn them into sheaves. And
where are the peasants? It would be the work of a few seconds
Well, OK, you're halfway there. I'll leave the perverse line alone.
:))
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well get this Jack. I love both Velvia and Reala. That's kinda
perverse,
huh? I guess I can see the good in both.
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 16/7/06, Jack Davis, discombobulated, unleashed:
URL produces file not found.
Just as well, first thing you know someone will right a song about
bringing in the sheaves.
Bob's links always appear broken in my email app.
http://www.barbizon-france.com/english/Pages/Barbizon/peintur/jfmill/
On Jul 16, 2006, at 9:36 AM, Doug Brewer wrote:
I've been sorely tempted to try out Aperture for my Mac at home, as
it looks to be a pretty good program. Have any of you run it through
any sort of testing?
I have only played with Aperture v1.1 a very little bit since it only
supports the
URL produces file not found.
Just as well, first thing you know someone will right a song about
bringing in the sheaves.
Bob's links always appear broken in my email app.
http://www.barbizon-france.com/english/Pages/Barbizon/peintur/jfmill/
ang2.html
--
I do it specially for you,
i like!!! you did great! number ___0299 looks like one of the BeeGees
Charles Robinson wrote:
Had an opportunity to shoot a local band for their first concert in 3
years. Funny thing was, I walked away from the show just kicking
myself that I hadn't gotten any halfway-decent shots
You have some very nice shots here. Good work. And you can't ask for
mujch better light than magic hour shade. I like these.
Paul
On Jul 16, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
Had an opportunity to shoot a local band for their first concert in 3
years. Funny thing was, I walked away
And apparently for many if not most, a fix isn't needed here. I
looked at this several different ways. I like the DOF treatment as
shot. This is the way two objects a few feet apart are seen by a long
lens. Whether the near flower is at top or bottom of frame is
irrelevant for the most
Thanks, Cotty. (?)
Jack
--- Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16/7/06, Jack Davis, discombobulated, unleashed:
URL produces file not found.
Just as well, first thing you know someone will right a song about
bringing in the sheaves.
Bob's links always appear broken in my email app.
On 16.07.06, at 18:36 , Doug Brewer wrote:
I've been sorely tempted to try out Aperture for my Mac at home, as
it looks to be a pretty good program. Have any of you run it through
any sort of testing?
I have been testing it along with beta version of Adobe's Lightroom.
Finally I choose
On Jul 16, 2006, at 2:32 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
And apparently for many if not most, a fix isn't needed here. I
looked at this several different ways. I like the DOF treatment as
shot. This is the way two objects a few feet apart are seen by a long
lens. Whether the near flower is at top
Mostly agree except for
I learned to appreciate Scotch, I don't need to do more.
For me its small batch Bourbon - elixir of life.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Snap du jour: the honey-heavy dew of slumber
- Original
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like PowerDVD. Although they all work pretty much the same. PowerDVD came
with something I bought/got and I've found it the easiest to use with the
nicest skins. But it's really a matter of personal preference. Just try one
or
two. Not sure PowerDVD
Thanks, That's my favorite shot of the bunch.
See you later, gs
http://georgesphotos.net
On 7/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/7/2006 11:20:02 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On July 1 - the local kite club held their Red, White and
No apology necessary. It was a worthwhile discussion, and it serves
to illustrate that we all see things differently.
Paul
On Jul 16, 2006, at 2:38 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
On Jul 16, 2006, at 2:32 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
And apparently for many if not most, a fix isn't needed here. I
I can go either way on this one, although I tend to lean toward
Scotch. If for no other reason, it seems lighter and certainly less
sweet.
Paul
On Jul 16, 2006, at 2:43 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Mostly agree except for
I learned to appreciate Scotch, I don't need to do more.
For me its
Well, that translates to about US$320. Last new prices I saw on this
scanner at BH Photo was about $265. They are now listing refurbished
units for $189 but are out of stock.
Right. $265 + shipping + tax would be quite a bit more than $320 (or
equivalent.) With a base price of $189,
In a message dated 7/16/2006 9:37:53 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd also like to point out that it is not a picture of a down-and-out.
It's a picture of a person who was asleep on his feet in an
interesting composition.
Regards,
Bob
I was reacting to Paul's
Godders wrote:
I look forward to seeing the timing data.
That is, in my opinion, always the bottom
line vs software tools feedback given the very
different hardware and software environments.
I also ordered one of those FireWire readers
that Paul mentioned so I'll be doing some more
On 16/7/06, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
I have my email program set to insert a linebreak automatically after
70 (?) characters. This is so that it doesn't appear as a continuous
single line to people with certain email programs. It's not smart to
enough to recognize a long URL and send it
On Jul 16, 2006, at 13:28, Robert and Leigh Woerner wrote:
i like!!! you did great! number ___0299 looks like one of the
BeeGees
I wonder what Dan Wilson (the subject of that photo) would think if I
told him that. Yikes!
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minneapolis,
... 'cause you are a bird!
(who cares that you can't fly?!)
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/CentralCoastCA/IMGP3490sm.jpg
(ostriches)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I'm actually rather pleased with this:
http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bildegalleri/vis_bilde.cgi?id=247312
- But maybe you have to consider the type of equipment used. A hint is
in the subject line ;-)
(Pictures not from a Pentax is all right for PESO, aren't they?)
- Toralf
--
PDML
Sat, 15 Jul 2006 21:13:14 -0700
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Both of these are good concepts, if somewhat commonly seen for
California farmland.
The way you framed them is fairly static ... by that I mean, too much
sky, too much centered and balanced for my taste. A little less sky,
a
Those guys could be steaks in a matter of minutes. Anyone hungry?
On Jul 16, 2006, at 4:59 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
... 'cause you are a bird!
(who cares that you can't fly?!)
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/CentralCoastCA/IMGP3490sm.jpg
(ostriches)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Great shot. A Holga no doubt.
Paul
On Jul 16, 2006, at 5:02 PM, Toralf Lund wrote:
I'm actually rather pleased with this:
http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bildegalleri/vis_bilde.cgi?id=247312
- But maybe you have to consider the type of equipment used. A hint is
in the subject line ;-)
Canoe. Is that a Canadian Consolation Prize??? Thanks. :-)
Tom C.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Water Warp
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 19:04:08 -0600
- Original Message
Ahhh ... that's part of the problem. For the web, it's generally better to
use sRGB. That issue has been discussed her many, many times, so I won't
rehash it again.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Igor Roshchin
It is possible that some half an hour-an hour later the color gamma
would'be
On Jul 16, 2006, at 2:09 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Thank you both for commenting.
You're welcome.
PS. Godfrey: as for dynamism, let me offer to your attention the
picture
from another image that I just posted in a different thread
(don't eat like a pig).
LOL ...
Funny but not really a
If I don't ask for comments, it's because I've forgotten to do so.
So, I invite all to provide me the benefit of your reactions to any of
my uploads.
Thanks,
Jack
--- Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marnie's barn (with it's front in shadow) reminded me of this.
Mamiya 6 w/50mm f/4.1L.
It looks awful! No detail in the dark areas, the overall tone is flat and
lifeless. It's posted as a BMP file. Was that your intent?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Jack Davis
Marnie's barn (with it's front in shadow) reminded me of this.
Mamiya 6 w/50mm f/4.1L.
Location: Yuba
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/14/2006 7:13:33 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/2646/display/6152995
This was taken about 30 minutes after my wife and I nearly got struck by
lightning at Dead Horse Point.
Comments
Sun Jul 16 15:30:31 EST 2006
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I 'd like to see those results as I'm sometimes impatient when files are
downloading. I just ordered the 150X Transcend 2GB card. Surprise,
surprise! Soon after your last message NewEgg sent me an email noting
that
the price on the
A Treo 650 is what? A phone? A game? Has the Treo been configured to
handle a 2GB card. A lot of reviewers think that just any card will work
in their product without having checked to see if the item has the firmware
that's able to handle the card.
We already know the card works well with
Hmmm ... I may have been a little hasty. I checked around and it's quite
possible that my readers won't work with the 2GB cards. Glad I took a
moment to investigate further. Thanks again.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Igor Roshchin
http://tinyurl.com/rqx6a
This means that some other
You're right about there being no detail in the dark areas.
What's a BMP file? Scanned (wimp flatbed) as a jpg.
Contrast was upped slightly to add depth and encourage a denser black.
Thus the desired dark areas.
Thanks, Shel
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks awful! No
http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/B/BMP.html
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Jack Davis
You're right about there being no detail in the dark areas.
What's a BMP file? Scanned (wimp flatbed) as a jpg.
Contrast was upped slightly to add depth and encourage a denser black.
Thus the desired dark
On 7/16/06, Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://charles.robinsontwins.org/2006_July_Semisonic
Great shots, Charles! I really like #0357. Even though there's a mic
blocking the drummer's face, the base player looks like he's in
motion, which is cool. I also like 0877 because of
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
