Nice!
This was taken as the egrets flew off. I had to crop it a fair bit as
I didn't have enough reach with the 400mm.
Pentax *istD, Tokina AT-X SD 400/5.6, handheld, manual focus
ISO 200, 1/1500 sec @ f/8.0
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3187a.htm
Comments welcome.
--
PDML
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Bruce, Peter, Jack, Mark, ...
You guys have got to stop it!
I promise I'll post some more, so as to lower the standard a bit ;-/
The batches of PESO's the last several days has been very troubling.
Every time I get close to producing PESO quality images,
you guys move
Bruce,
This is definitely one of the best egret shots I've seen in a while.
Amazing detail in the perfect exposure as evident in the birds legs
and feet.
The bokeh is very pleasing also. Makes me want to use my Tokina even
more now. Were you using a tripod for this shot?
JayT
--
PDML
On 17/7/06, Powull Harkrave, discombobulated, unleashed:
These are obviously a sub species of Dalags from Dr. WHO.
Dalags ??
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
Hi,
today's Magnum essay on Slate is about Rome. One of the photos is by
Henri Cartier-Bresson:
http://todayspictures.slate.com/20060718/14.html
I have a somewhat similar photo, taken in Cortona, Tuscany in 1980:
http://www.web-options.com/Cortona.jpg
Perhaps they teach the walk in the seminary
It's where Dr. Who keeps the Daleks prisoner. Dalag Luft VII, etc...
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Cotty
Sent: 18 July 2006 08:07
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: PESO - Aliens
On 17/7/06, Powull Harkrave,
An alien species related to the Daleks who's evolution lags behind that of
their more sophisticated cousins.
;-)
Dave
At 03:06 PM 18/07/2006, Cotty wrote:
On 17/7/06, Powull Harkrave, discombobulated, unleashed:
These are obviously a sub species of Dalags from Dr. WHO.
Dalags ??
--
On 18/7/06, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
An alien species related to the Daleks who's evolution lags behind that of
their more sophisticated cousins.
You're talking a load of dalags man!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
That's nothing new.
Dave
At 04:33 PM 18/07/2006, Cotty wrote:
On 18/7/06, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
An alien species related to the Daleks who's evolution lags behind that of
their more sophisticated cousins.
You're talking a load of dalags man!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
--
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006, Mark Roberts wrote:
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
The MZ-S should sell. But don't compare with KEH; they have time in
their hands, which you don't.
I don't? How do you come to that conclusion???
The ebay auction time is finite, that's what I meant. KEH can ask a
high
Of all the photos of egrets I've seen today, that's one of them.
Excellent shot Bruce.
Dave
On 7/18/06, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At least I believe that is what it is. Got several pretty good shots
on my walk this morning. So another couple may be coming through.
Pentax
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have any of you guys ever thought of collaborating
Even wittier than usual, Tom.
-
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software
Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
--
From: Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/15 Sat PM 08:33:14 GMT
To: PDML PDML@pdml.net
Subject: Reply from Pentax on FA28-70/4 repair.
As most of you will recall I've been trying to get an answer from
Pentax as to whether they can fix the fogged/cracked element in
the FA
Other than giving a one year warranty, I couldn't get an answer
from them as to whether the compound element that fails has been
changed in any way.
Many of these took several years to fail, so only time would tell.
Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
At 300K, you should be able to get far larger dimensions than what
you've posted. Resolution above 72 dpi accomplishes nothing on the web.
Size it for a substantial dimension, like 12 inches on the long side,
at 72 dpi.
Paul
On Jul 17, 2006, at 11:27 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
This is a
Cotty wrote:
On 13/7/06, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/oxfordshire/5177868.stm
I've been up there all evening, got in at 10pm for bangers and mash :-)
And on overtime all day! Trebles all round!!
Oh my! Now THAT can't hurt your feelings!
Shel wrote:
Well, Frank, apparently, according to some people, if the intent or meaning
isn't spelled out for them, it is a bad thing.
If I was to answer this your way, Shel, I would also begin with Well,
Frank, But I have no shame of discussing photography with people
I do not agree with,
I will finaly sell a bunch of lenses/camera/flashes I do not use
enough since I got my ist-D but really I dunno about prices, the
market being what it is (and I have no time monitoring prices all day
long).
Cameras:
* SuperA (works pretty well, but not black paint going away in the corners)
*
Looking at eekBay completed items and KEH are good sources for
pricing items.
My only suggestion would be to take another look at the F and A 35-70s.
Both of them, particularly the A, are very good lenses.
Mine are very much on my keepers list.
Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
They are really stunning images, but
discouraging!
Regards, Bob S.
Your discouraged.Have you seen mine lately
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
2006/7/18, Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Looking at eekBay completed items and KEH are good sources for
pricing items.
Thanks for the ideas.
My only suggestion would be to take another look at the F and A 35-70s.
Both of them, particularly the A, are very good lenses.
Mine are very much
Just got this one in today.
All I can say it is a real limitted, same style,
same look and feel, and comes with the
same type of leather pouch.
It is much less of a 'pancake' than the 40mm is,
actually resembles the 43 limitted more.
Hood and cap are perfect too, the hood
uses some kind of
Mark Roberts wrote:
Bruce Dayton wrote:
At least I believe that is what it is. Got several pretty good shots
on my walk this morning. So another couple may be coming through.
Pentax *istD, Tokina AT-X 400/5.6, handheld
ISO 200, 1/1000 sec @ f/8.0
I'm in fast company. Thanks, Toralf!
Jack
--- Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Bruce, Peter, Jack, Mark, ...
You guys have got to stop it!
I promise I'll post some more, so as to lower the standard a bit ;-/
The batches of PESO's the last several days has
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/demo.html
Pentax MX, Tri-X @ 250 in ID-11
Comments, crits, rotten tomatoes welcome
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I like it a lot - partly because of
@ 72 dpi: (It's too early)
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=136
Jack
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
At 72 dpi:
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID-136
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 300K, you should be able to get far larger dimensions than what
you've posted. Resolution above 72 dpi accomplishes nothing on the
web.
Size it for a substantial
In a message dated 7/18/2006 5:53:11 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
writes:
I like it a lot - partly because of the ambiguities, partly
because of the
structure of the shot.
ann
===
What she said. The meaning can remain a mystery. Although to me it says he
does not agree.
In a message dated 7/17/2006 1:36:14 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This was taken as the egrets flew off. I had to crop it a fair bit as
I didn't have enough reach with the 400mm.
Pentax *istD, Tokina AT-X SD 400/5.6, handheld, manual focus
ISO 200, 1/1500 sec @ f/8.0
On Jul 18, 2006, at 6:56, Thibouille wrote:
2006/7/18, Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Looking at eekBay completed items and KEH are good sources for
pricing items.
Thanks for the ideas.
My only suggestion would be to take another look at the F and A
35-70s.
Both of them, particularly
In a message dated 7/17/2006 5:27:57 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Just a quick capture of a tired out buddy.
Comments - yea/nay/otherwise.
Kenneth Waller
Huh. Interesting to see one relaxing
In a message dated 7/17/2006 3:46:42 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.robertstech.com/peso.htm
Shot a couple of years ago and recently re-discovered whilst backing
up my archives.
--
Mark Roberts Photography Multimedia
Nice and sharp and nice colors, and
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Charles Robinson wrote:
I got my A 35-70 from Godfrey for about $35 a year ago. You're
probably hoping for more than that though, right?
Which of the two, Charles, the 3.5-4.5 or the constant-4?
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
In a message dated 7/17/2006 7:10:05 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce, Peter, Jack, Mark, ...
You guys have got to stop it!
The batches of PESO's the last several days has been very troubling.
Every time I get close to producing PESO quality images,
you guys move the bar
In a message dated 7/18/2006 6:06:25 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
@ 72 dpi: (It's too early)
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=136
Jack
It's a very nice image, but it looks too green to me. I know the grass is
green and the wood is
Thanks Mark, Shel, Paul.
Paul i use the Channel Mixer to, but i seem to be able to get the
general conversion ok, but its that fine tweak, that still gives me
problems. Same as when i printed at home, pic's are grey and white,
not black and white.
Shel, you may not read this as your TTFN,
Of course KEH is not a very good source for European pricing. They do
tend to be on the high end of fair for the US.
Ebay works if there are several completed items listed; if there are
just one or two it is hard to tell as they may have sold very high, or
very low. Many of the old ways of
H, Congratulations. Pentax called me today, it has arrived. I
´ll get it tomorrow. Now I´m really looking forward to it .-)
DagT
Den 18. jul. 2006 kl. 14.24 skrev Jan van Wijk:
Just got this one in today.
All I can say it is a real limitted, same style,
same look and feel, and comes
In a message dated 7/17/2006 6:06:59 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was backing up my pentax files, (and God what a lot of awful tripe
I've produced). However every once in a while I come across good one.
This was taken last year with my *ist-D
Op Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:03:23 +0200 schreef Thibouille
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Some stabs:
* Ricoh KR10X (plastic body but works really well)
Uneducated guess: Zilch?
* SFXn (missing eyepiece, but all other covers in place)
€10,- to €30,-. If you put it on ebay, I'd offer it with the F35-70...
In a message dated 7/17/2006 5:11:56 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
took this about a year ago, and never gave it another thought. Just
another JPG snapshot.
http://static.flickr.com/54/192158638_7131bc8886_o.jpg
Saw it last night on the husband's computer screen (he is
In a message dated 7/17/2006 12:29:39 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Very graphic image. The only thing I would say is that the sky needs
'dusting' ;-)
I rather like it.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
===
Ditto. Although the front of the barn was in shadow and that is okay, I
Well done.
I like the first one, fungus and twig.
Dave, stepping out for a steak, Brooks
Quoting Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
After yesterday's discovery of that old fungus shot, I decided to
revamp my fungus photo gallery. (And yes, I am a sad git to actually
have a gallery of fungus
Yes, I believe in cropping. In fact I usually shoot with the intent of
cropping as part of the processing. One of the many reason mini-lab
prints never quite did it for me (short of using a pair of scissors,
grin). With event photography one has to shoot tightly because develop
and print is
No excuse, but I, too, felt it was somewhat too green and confirmed it
by com parring it to the site image. Since I was into up-sizing the
image, went with that goal rather than color correction. My excuse,
abject laziness.
Since there have been multiple uploads for this thing, will probably
not
In a message dated 7/17/2006 7:44:38 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
writes:
My new roomie
http://users.rcn.com/annsan/ashley1bw.jpg
ann
=
Cute.
Someone told me the other day I could foster a dog for a sort of animal
rescue place. Not a long term commitment and that way
I, too, feel uncompromising when I consider lightening the barn.
I've sensed my reaction to it's density fluctuation a number of times
and this is where I'm most comfortable.
Knowing other reactions is my whole point of putting these up and I'm
grateful for all ideas and comments.
I'll be pleased
On Jul 18, 2006, at 8:41, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Charles Robinson wrote:
I got my A 35-70 from Godfrey for about $35 a year ago. You're
probably hoping for more than that though, right?
Which of the two, Charles, the 3.5-4.5 or the constant-4?
Constant 4
Wasn't
In a message dated 7/16/2006 2:05:05 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
writes:
... 'cause you are a bird!
(who cares that you can't fly?!)
http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/CentralCoastCA/IMGP3490sm.jpg
(ostriches)
===
LOL.
Technically, probably better if the front bird was not
In a message dated 7/18/2006 7:42:32 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I, too, feel uncompromising when I consider lightening the barn.
I've sensed my reaction to it's density fluctuation a number of times
and this is where I'm most comfortable.
Knowing other reactions is my
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Pentax *istD, Tokina AT-X 400/5.6, handheld
ISO 200, 1/1000 sec @ f/8.0
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3179a.htm
That's one fine egret! Excellent work.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 7/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/17/2006 5:11:56 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
took this about a year ago, and never gave it another thought. Just
another JPG snapshot.
http://static.flickr.com/54/192158638_7131bc8886_o.jpg
No, there is both an F and a A version of the 3.5-4.5 but no FA
version (unfortunately).
2006/7/18, Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Jul 18, 2006, at 8:41, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Charles Robinson wrote:
I got my A 35-70 from Godfrey for about $35 a year
Came upon this scene some time back and quickly pulled over (I usually
just slow down G) for a quick hand held grab.
Clouds (not jet con trails) were in a striking form over my neighboring
Sutter Buttes and I was shaky anxious to 'get the shot'.
I don't recall if I had a tripod in the car, but I
P.J. wrote:
http://www.mindspring.com/~megazip/PESO_--_tscs.html
Tech. Info.:
Pentax *ist-D ISO 200 @ 1/125sec (Av)
smc Pentax-F 70-210mm f4.0~5.6 @ f13.0 (70mm)
Very nice indeed. I like the colors, tones, and geometries all.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Jul 18, 2006, at 8:01 AM, skye wrote:
http://static.flickr.com/54/192158638_7131bc8886_o.jpg
It has its charm as a sunset-abstract. I usually get bored at
sunset photos, but the structure of the car in this one attracts my
interest: it offers a different take on the subject.
Godfrey
either of these two works just fine. I tend to like the wider format
in this particular instance just a little more.
Godfrey
On Jul 18, 2006, at 7:55 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=137
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=138
--
A version:
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/zooms/medium/A35-70f3.5-4.5.html
F version:
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/zooms/medium/F35-70f3.5-4.5.html
FA version:
Sorry no FA version...
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Jul 18, 2006, at 8:41, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jul
On Jul 18, 2006, at 7:37 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
I got my A 35-70 from Godfrey for about $35 a year ago. You're
probably hoping for more than that though, right?
Which of the two, Charles, the 3.5-4.5 or the constant-4?
Constant f/4
Wasn't the 3.5 - 4.5 an FA?
They made the
PJ,
Very nice. I like the way the layers in the image lead your eye from
the fore to mid and background. Each of these zones is interesting
and makes for a pleasing composition.
JayT
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
It's not that Jens is wrong, it's that he blames his camera for the fact that
he spends a lot of time on post-production. His problem is simply his style of
shooting.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: funny K10D story
Date: Tue Jul 18, 2006 10:20
On Jul 18, 2006, at 5:24 AM, Jan van Wijk wrote:
...It is much less of a 'pancake' than the 40mm is,
actually resembles the 43 limitted more. ...
http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/pentax.php
I saw one at the local dealer yesterday. It's much more appealing to
me than the 40mm pancake. It has
I too would go with the wide version. Nice shot. I like the heavily saturated
look.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
either of these two works just fine. I tend to like the wider format
in this particular instance just a
I agree, it's actually a fairly nice little lens, though it does extend
a long way when at it's shortest focal length. I got mine on e-bay for
about $45.00, to fill the gap left in my zoom lenses when the FA 28-70
developed it's cataract. It actually seems to have a better build than
the FA,
With regards to having intent or meaning spelled out, there are photos
in this world that can stand alone without any words accompanying
them, and still convey meaning and intent across cultural, ethnic,
political, or any other psychological barrier. You have, on occasion,
shown good examples
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/6177055
and
http://www.photosight.ru/photo.php?photoid=1542700
Comments and suggestions are, as always, most welcome.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
manual
Jack, great capture.
I prefer the wider shot by a small margin.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: Horse Tail Sky
Came upon this scene some time back and quickly pulled over (I usually
just slow down G) for a quick hand held grab.
At least I think it is. This was taken on the same walk yesterday as
the egrets. The odd looking patterns you see in the background are, I
believe, reflections from trees and foliage. I shot from a small hill
above the bird so he was entirely surrounded by water and all the
background is a
... h. I thought I had all the Limited's (31-43-77). Now there's one
more to buy. Must be grat for panoramas ;-)
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks, Jay. This was shot handheld. Yeah, that Tokina is a fine
lens. A few years ago, I had a Pentax A 400/5.6 lens. I have found
the Tokina to be a pretty similar performer (closer focusing, by far)
in a much more compact and usable package. It is a keeper for sure.
--
Bruce
Monday,
Some images taken of the 21mm on the *istD:
http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/pentax.php
Anything through instead of on ?:-)
-Ryan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
We had a discussion recently about automated gallery making and I've
been on the lookout for them.
I've found another that works quite well. I'm not too impressed with the
appearance, but there are other templates available. One called Brushed
Titanium is pretty awful so I dumped that and
Very cool sky. In this case, I like the first one - the shot is
really about the sky and I think a little breathing room on the horse
tail works better.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 7:55:21 AM, you wrote:
JD Came upon this scene some time back and quickly pulled over (I usually
JD just
Bruce,
Beautifully cropped and processed. Even the perch limb contributes a
pleasing curve.
Mottled homogeneous reflections compliment the pose.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At least I think it is. This was taken on the same walk yesterday as
the egrets. The odd looking
Hello Jack,
It looks a bit better in regards to sharpening. I do like the image.
I routinely post my images at 800 pixels on the long edge and almost
never go above 200k - I'm wondering why you are having a struggle?
What level of compression are you using?
The reason I ask, is because I think
It's hard for me to decide. I like both. I tend to like the strict
composition of the cropped version, however... not being their myself, I
suspect the uncropped version probably more accurately portrays the sweeping
vista of the scene. I have to come down in favor of #1 were I forced to
Hello Ralf,
Neither of these two are as striking as some of the previous photos
you've posted. The first is a pipe - I just don't relate to it very
well. The second if focusing on an access gate, rather than the plant
behind it. If this were part of a series, it might be a great photo -
as a
Thanks, Ken.
Seems to be unanimous. All those having commented, thus far, expressed
at least a small preference for the full frame version.
Opinions appreciated.
Jack
--- Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack, great capture.
I prefer the wider shot by a small margin.
Kenneth
Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Ralf,
Neither of these two are as striking as some of the previous photos
you've posted. The first is a pipe - I just don't relate to it very
well.
Thanks for your remarks, Bruce.
Well, I guess it depends more on the (French and German) text
This is very nice, Bruce.
I did find myself wishing for a bit more feather detail.
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Bruce Dayton wrote:
At least I think it is. This was taken on the same walk yesterday as
the egrets. The odd looking patterns you see in the background are, I
believe, reflections from trees and foliage. I shot from a small hill
above the bird so he was entirely surrounded by water and all
Forgot these were up.:-)
http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj/index.htm
Some shots from the July 1st weekend. I had this up earlier, but only 1/2 of
the pictures
made it for
some reason. All of them i like are on now. Shot in Raw and used web gallery
from Browser
to make
the
Bruce,
I'll just go ahead and embarrass myself (my life long challenge) by
saying that I don't have any idea.
I'm going to try a much larger upload.
I desaturated the green, but the image still has a green look about it.
I think, it's simply do to the expanse of grass.
I set the image size, but
Jack Double Click to Close Window Davis wrote:
The left side is very dramatic, but, over time, the cropped left side
version is more in keeping with my file of compositional rules.
Requesting your opinions.
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=137
Nicely composed, Bruce.
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
My DA 21 F3.2 Limited arrived yesterday, so last evening I went out to
test it against the FA 20 F2.8. I followed my usual protocol:
Subject was a mud-brick wall, with cracks and many small rocks.
Tripod.
Distance for the DA 21 was about 1 meter. For the FA 20 I brought the
tripod closer by a
This is double click Jack. (?)
Thanks, Mark for your valued opinion.
I agree. Without the left side cloud streaks, there would be no
question.
Jack
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack Double Click to Close Window Davis wrote:
The left side is very dramatic, but, over time, the
I´m tired of all of this talk about sharpness. What about vignetting
and distortion. The latter is the reason why i´m not very happy with
my A20mm.
DagT
Den 18. jul. 2006 kl. 18.49 skrev Joseph Tainter:
My DA 21 F3.2 Limited arrived yesterday, so last evening I went out to
test it
I first printed and displayed it full frame. Couldn't stop dwelling on
it and finally took it off the wall and put up the cropped version.
Slept better... for awhile.
Love a benign photo concern.
Thanks, Tom.
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's hard for me to decide. I like both. I
Why do you have to 'try' an upload? Are you sizing the image before
uploading or is there some software you use to do it all at once?
To do it best you should resize your image to the dimensions you want
and then after that, sharpen to taste for that size. Then save it
with the amount of
Hi Ryan,
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:03:11 -0500, Ryan Brooks wrote:
Some images taken of the 21mm on the *istD:
http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/pentax.php
Anything through instead of on ?:-)
Nothing worth showing yet :-)
I made a few of my home intteriour, and will be taking the lens
Jack Davis wrote:
This is double click Jack. (?)
All your web pages have Double Click to Close Window as their title!
--
Mark Roberts Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
412-687-2835
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On a web page all that matters is pixels. ie. 600 pixels x 800 pixels.
Level of compression will change the number of bytes in the image file
versus the image quality.
PPI, DPI, Inches do not matter. These only come into effect when you print.
Powell
I set the image size, but when attached,
On 7/18/06, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
today's Magnum essay on Slate is about Rome. One of the photos is by
Henri Cartier-Bresson:
http://todayspictures.slate.com/20060718/14.html
I have a somewhat similar photo, taken in Cortona, Tuscany in 1980:
http://www.web-options.com
I don't think it is bokeh, I believe it is reflection background - you
would probably see much more of if it were bokeh - as taken, it is
very discreet like portions of reflections of tree trunks or ripples
or some such.
I'm guessing by you not correcting my identification, that it is a
Blue
2 more, the 40mm DA limited and the new 21mm. And a 70mm f2.4 DA Limited
will arrive this fall.
You've got the full set of FA Limiteds.
-Adam
Jens Bladt wrote:
... h. I thought I had all the Limited's (31-43-77). Now there's one
more to buy. Must be grat for panoramas ;-)
Regards
Jens
Bruce Dayton wrote:
I don't think it is bokeh, I believe it is reflection background - you
would probably see much more of if it were bokeh - as taken, it is
very discreet like portions of reflections of tree trunks or ripples
or some such.
I'm guessing by you not correcting my
Cool shot. Like the line work so to speak.
Dave
Quoting Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4682145
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Equine Photography in York Region
--
PDML
What Bill said, less the baby part.g
Lovely shoot.
Dave
Quoting Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
...during a break in the rain:
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/2646/display/6152995
This was taken about 30 minutes after my wife and I nearly got struck by
lightning at Dead Horse
Hey, just like me, all thumbs.g
Nice shot Doug.
Dave
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://www.alphoto.com/images/hands.jpg
enjoy
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Equine Photography in York Region
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
1 - 100 of 239 matches
Mail list logo
