A local auction show a Pentax SMC TAKUMAR 1:4 150mm. Currently 15 USD - 14
hours left!
Anyone interested - send me an e-mail?
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
On Aug 18, 2006, at 10:28 PM, Brendan MacRae wrote:
Nearly all modern SLRs set the aperture manually via
a control on the
body. Nikon, Canon, Minolta aka Sony, Pentax. In not
so much time,
you might not have any option to buy anything else
other than as used
gear.
Ok, but really modern
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Practically every SLR, film or digital, made since
the middle 1990s,
other than the MZ-S and a couple others. Canon
actually started doing
things this way with the A1 back in, what, 1974 or
so?
Seems strange, however, that Pentax moved
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 04:48:22 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/18/2006 10:08:21 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Excellent. I like this. The color is subtle yet rich. But I would rotate
it
about one degree counterclockwise or until both cable supports
All Pentaxes (I think) allow direct aperture setting, but some (A3, ME and
variants) do not allow manual setting of the shutter speed.
John
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 06:20:37 +0100, Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is there an SLR that does not allow direct setting of the aperture?
Don W
Precisely. I had to write off an A 1:1.7 50mm because of a problem with
the little springs that control the A setting button. These parts don't
exist on the ringless lenses.
Fortunately a nice man from Newcastle took it off my hands.
John
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 04:45:42 +0100, Godfrey
It's a lovely picture, Jack. I agree with the various criticisms, which
are technical in nature, but the concept and composition and deep colours
work well - for me, anyway - and transcend the slight technical
imperfections.
Sounds obvious, but have you had your eyes tested recently? A
There is something wrong, isn't there? It seems to me that the front pylon
does not have any ground support! Is it hanging in the air?
Well, its seems the pylon is hidden behind a rock:
http://www.eviaggiatori.it/sfondi/800x600%20golden%20gate.jpg
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
The worlds longest bridge (free suspension span) is Japaneese Akashi Kaikyo
(1991 m): http://en.structurae.de/structures/data/index.cfm?ID=s001
Second place is Sorebalt (1998) in Denmark: f1624m:
http://www.storebaelt.dk/kollage/broen.
Golden Gate held the world record for 27 years with its
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't commented on others' PESOs for about a week, but I will soon and
try to catch up. With that in mind...
I went out yesterday to photograph a famous landmark, which I will show
later, and also ended up photographing this. I am probably the only one that
Jack,
I had the same feeling about oversharpening as Paul.
The hairs on the leaf just don't look natural to me.
They look to be brought out with sharpening.
Just my first impression, Bob S.
On 8/18/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice shot. Perhaps a bit oversharpened.
Paul
On Aug
The nursery person said it was a water lily and I had permission to do
all the picture taking I wanted.
I asked nothing further.
Thanks, Don.
Jack
--- Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good picture but what is the flower?
Don W
Jack Davis wrote:
This shot with A70~210 f/4 with
Those hairs are a feature I especially like and their resolution
pleases me. They are too obvious?
I can kinda see myself and the reflector in the droplets, although much
less obvious. Such detail fascinates me.
Thanks, Bob.
Jack
--- Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack,
I had the same
John,
Certainly a thought. I am due for a new eye glass prescription.
My feeling in this case is that reflections of the 36 dia. white
reflector, along my tendency to nudge contrast to lend depth to images,
has been a distraction.
Early a.m. sun was coming from behind and to the right. Reflector
Nice shot, well composed. It's difficult to say with such a small
image, but it doesn't appear to be grossly oversharpened, but it may be
borderline. The edges of the petals against black look just a wee bit
crusty.
Paul
On Aug 19, 2006, at 1:36 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
This shot with A70~210
USM is an acronym for Unsharp Mask, which is a sharpening tool in
PhotoShop. It's the most common type of sharpening used on scans or
digital images. To explain it in a very untechnical way, it increases
contrast where edges of objects meet in a photo. Too much USM, yields a
frosty, sparkling
A group of us from Northern California, from Silicon Valley and Santa Cruz
up through Sacramento and the Sierra Foothills, are planning a
get-together. At this point there are about eight of us - kind of
regulars to these meetings - who are discussing the possibilities off
list. If you're
Thanks, Paul.
I'm familiar with USM..obviously. :)
I'll discuss the scanning regime with my scanning source when next
used.
The odd thing to me is not seeing it in my work. A bit soft; has been
my consistent reaction to many member uploads. Attributed it to haste
and the assumed further PS'ing to
Paul,
The lack of benefits to be derived from larger images is certainly
missed.
It's a gross world. I'll try not to contribute to it by heavy handed
use of the USM tool.
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice shot, well composed. It's difficult to say with such a small
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis
Subject: Re: PESO Dawn Jewlery
William,
No flash. White reflector.
So, we now have sucking over sharpening?
Otherwise, how do you like it? :-]]
Thanks for thoughts.
The reflector is doing the same thing a flash would do, which is frying
the
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis
Subject: PESO: Yellow Lily
This shot with A70~210 f/4 with extension ring (forget which one) and
on macro setting. Been a favorite lens!
Last offering for tonight and last flower for..(?)
Jack
Small 2004 film scan on a 3 1/2 floppy. Decent scan to be done when
sold. Still waiting. I know...could be awhile.:)
Have diddled with it a bit. See below.
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=175
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
I hope my Optometrist can fit me as well as yours did you. 8)
Jack
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis
Subject: PESO: Yellow Lily
This shot with A70~210 f/4 with extension ring (forget which one)
and
on macro setting. Been a
That is the reason for hiring experts. They usually can save you money
over doing it yourself. And they take all the flack, worth the money in
itself in my opinion. However, some of us are so poor we have to do it
ourselves. The saving grace there is that we also have to do the work
ourselves
Jack,
Just about all your posted images look over sharpened to me - some grossly
so. See your optometrist, check your monitor, try not to work when you're
tired. Speaking for myself, when I work late into the evening, my ability
to focus well and get good quality sharpening practically
Nice capture, but it's not up to your best. (You probably knew that...)
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Bette's is an old fashioned diner located in West Berkeley. It's mostly a
breakfast joint - open at 6:00am, closes around 2:30. The place is famous
for its buttermilk pancakes and for its wonderful
The Panasonic DMC-L1 allows use of an aperture ring to set aperture (on
lenses so equipped), but the aperture ring is entirely virtual, it's not
a mechanical aperture ring, just an electronic control on the lens (just
like the focus ring on all Oly and Leica 4/3rds lenses)
-Adam
Brendan
On 8/18/06, Douglas Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear All,
As you might have guessed from the subject line (!), I
am a new member. I recently found this esteemed list
from a reference on DPReview.
WeLcOmE aBoArD. :-)
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Mark Roberts wrote:
Douglas Newman wrote:
Thanks for your warm welcome.
You're welcome. I hope you still feel that way in a month. :-)
It's not often that I come across a place with so many
Dougs!
Me either.
Mind if we call you Bruce to keep it clear?
;-)
Only if he's in charge of the
On 8/19/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/18/06, Douglas Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear All,
As you might have guessed from the subject line (!), I
am a new member. I recently found this esteemed list
from a reference on DPReview.
WeLcOmE aBoArD. :-)
Jostein
Shel,
I know your advice is given in good faith and I appreciate it.
Far as I've noticed, you did not respond to my highly complimentary
reaction to Bette's...
This gives me the chance to say that I see that image as a Rockwell.
Maybe a cover..if a little sharper. ;-))
Jack
--- Shel Belinkoff
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 10:28:12PM -0700, Brendan MacRae wrote:
Thanks for setting me straight, Godfrey. Good lord, I
had no idea the DSLR's operated that way. Now I'm just
pissed off. Do the *ist series film cameras operate
that way as well? Where the hell have I been?
You see, I knew
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 11:48:22PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/18/2006 10:08:21 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Excellent. I like this. The color is subtle yet rich. But I would rotate it
about one degree counterclockwise or until both cable
A snap from the Panasonic point and shoot digital. It's a 5
megapixel, small sensor camera with a Leica zoom lens. I like it.
This is a crop, about 70% of frame, ISO 800.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4825376size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I don't know how your browser or e-mail client is handling the URL. If
you copy the entire thing out of the e-mail and paste it into the
address bar it should come up. I'm not having any trouble with
Thunderbird and Firefox. Let me know if it still doesn't work.
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
alas -
The *ist-D already allows multiple exposures in camera, (I haven't used
it since I first got the camera so it took a while to figure out how to
enable it), it allows up to 9 exposures on the same frame.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, another go (not sure if it was mentioned before or if the
yay!
found something I felt falls within the interpretation of the theme
(remotely/obliquely).
just submitted and feeling good.
Sridhar
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--- John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 10:28:12PM -0700, Brendan
MacRae wrote:
Thanks for setting me straight, Godfrey. Good
lord, I
had no idea the DSLR's operated that way. Now I'm
just
pissed off. Do the *ist series film cameras
operate
that way
I've found a source for Ilford Galerie Smooth Gloss for about 25% less
than I can get it anywhere on line. I print to fit that and find frames
and mats to match. But then I'm a Yankee, (read cheap).
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Aug 16, 2006, at 2:47 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
Cropping the image
Well, they're scurrilous anyway...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But Tom, your posts about Pentax are scurrilous lies:-))
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually I perceive his post to be fairly accurate, based on the occcasions
I've
Semi-pro. You can starve with the rest of us. Single image or for
publication. (Nice shot by the way).
Steve Sharpe wrote:
It was this one -
http://earth.delith.com/malin.html
Does this make me a pro, now?
:^)
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream
Good luck finding a new zoom lens for a screw mount. In the used
category, Vivitar imported a 75-205 two touch that was a single coated
version, (same optical formula), of the original Series One, (70-210 one
touch). It was considerably lighter than the Series One, I got to
handle one a
On 8/18/06, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not just me beating up Pentax (good grief).
I second the parenthesis.
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
So I've finally got some hummingbirds at my feeder on a regular basis.
Who know how to capture them? (photographically, honest)
Care to share tips?
Cory
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I thought that criticizing Pentax was required here.
Mark Roberts wrote:
David Savage wrote:
The last post I can find from Wiggy is 22/06/05.
According to my archives he was only active for that month. Some
people just lack stamina.
What I find hilarious is his comment that
Sadly, not around here. The snapshot mini-labs are holding out in
supermarkets and drug store chains. The stand alone ones are dieing
where they sit, the custom labs are close behind.
graywolf wrote:
Yes, that indeed is the best thing about digital for serious
photographers. Of course there
Brendan,
Like everybody else (well, almost everybody), you'll get used to it after
a while, and then wonder why you ever thought having an aperture ring was
a good idea.
John
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 18:06:43 +0100, Brendan MacRae
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- John Francis [EMAIL
Nice pic, but I was expecting a small warship.
John
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 17:45:23 +0100, Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A snap from the Panasonic point and shoot digital. It's a 5
megapixel, small sensor camera with a Leica zoom lens. I like it.
This is a crop, about 70% of frame,
This is a great lens, one of my favorites. Well worth a reasonable
investment.
Jens Bladt wrote:
A local auction show a Pentax SMC TAKUMAR 1:4 150mm. Currently 15 USD - 14
hours left!
Anyone interested - send me an e-mail?
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85
John,
No, not me. I still shoot film and will for quite some
time. The whole idea of that lens design to me is
backwards. After all, for me photography is lenses so
changing them greatly just rubs me the wrong way. What
next? Since the camera is autofocus then no manual
focus ring?
It's true
What is the consensus of opinion for the PUG? I have a shot that I took for the
abandoned theme but I have something a hell of a lot better in my archive.
Do you put shots in there that you took just for the PUG or do you pull photos
out of your archive for it?
I don't want to cheat but I
Brandan opined:
It's definitely a frustration. I wish that the
engineers would think more in terms of making the new
technology as similar to the old as possible.
Except the thumbwheels are better than the aperture control on the
lens. With two thumbwheels, like those on the *istD, one
I have some in my garden. I'm going to try to shoot them the same way
I shoot dragonflies. My A400/5.6 handheld with the Sigma 500 Super
flash and Kirk Xtender. I'll probably shoot at something like 5.6 @
1000th, ISO 400, depending, of course, on the light. I may also try
with the 400 and
Hi Tom,
You are free to pick from your archive, of course.
Jostein
On 8/19/06, Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the consensus of opinion for the PUG? I have a shot that I took for
the abandoned theme but I have something a hell of a lot better in my archive.
Do you put shots in
Set up on the feeder and wait. g
You can try to use flash to freeze them but I don't care for that look.
I'm not a big fan of feeder pictures. At the camera clinic last August, the GFM
staff changed out the feeder (that the hummingbirds were used to) for some
flowers in a vase. You might try
Do you own a camera with snap-in focus or what's sometimes called,
trap focus?
I got several shots of them by this method, but nothing worth bringing
out in the light of day. Persistence was lacking during my Hummingbird
period.
If you don't receive further advice or want me to elaborate, let me
Has anybody even tried to answer the original question? Is the lens a dog
or what?
CW
- Original Message -
From: Brendan MacRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 11:47 PM
Subject: DA 100mm f2.8 Macro
Any good? I'm thinking of picking one up and
If you made the photo and used Pentax gear, you're fine AFAIK. No
requirement to shoot it recently at all.
CW
- Original Message -
From: Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2006 4:22 PM
Subject: PUG etiquette
What is the consensus of
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Except the thumbwheels are better than the aperture control on the
lens. With two thumbwheels, like those on the *istD, one can adjust
either shutter or aperture while keeping both hands firmly on the
camera and a finger on
I just posted a response to your question, but I want to, also, suggest
that you consider placing some cut blossoms on/around the feeder to
possibly include in a future crop.
Tried with and without high-speed flash.
Jack
--- cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I've finally got some
http://roman.blakout.net/?year=2006s=0category=essayblog=20060817150419
It's good idea to follow the music when you out there with a camera. I
know my friends sometimes get annoyed by my awkward path I walk. It's
just that I follow my way... Comments would be great to read, but I
should have
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Easy lads.
I have the D1, D2H, D200 and just put a bid in for a
D1H.
I'll admit it, I really like Nikons a lot.
My first D-SLR was a D1. Even though it was big and
heavy, I REALLY liked it. Unfortunately, it was also
defective and I couldn't get another
- Original Message -
From: Douglas Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have heard rumors that the K10D might be similar in
size and build to the D200. If that were true, I'd be
thrilled...
It is significantly smaller than the D200 and will give better image
quality. I have no idea how it
Douglas Newman wrote:
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Easy lads.
I have the D1, D2H, D200 and just put a bid in for a
D1H.
I'll admit it, I really like Nikons a lot.
My first D-SLR was a D1. Even though it was big and
heavy, I REALLY liked it. Unfortunately, it was also
A couple of years ago I watched James Nachtwey using his Canon to
photograph some compelling war footage. He never moved the camera from his
eye, making all adjustments via thumbwheels on the camera. I could
immediately see the advantage to that. In addition, using electronic
aperture control
--- Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or we could just call you Newman ... you're not a
postal carrier, by chance, I don't suppose? :-)
No, I'm not :-).
I am, however, Paul Newman's grandson. But not THAT
Paul Newman ;-)...
Doug
__
Do
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A couple of years ago I watched James Nachtwey using his Canon to
photograph some compelling war footage. He never moved the camera from
his
eye, making all adjustments via thumbwheels on the camera. I could
immediately
The difference can be seen. I can see it easily in the RAW files, and could
easily see such differences with film as well.
A couple of years ago we were arguing about exposure accuracy, and you took
the position that newer cameras with automatic exposure were more precise
and accurate than older
Hi,
I have Minolta Dual Scan IV as well and am satisfied with it. It is a
good scanner, especially for the price. I can recommend it for all
but one: mine refuses to autofocus or manual focus. The focus on the
scans seems fine, although I'm not sure if it is the best I can get.
I'd use the
On Aug 14, 2006, at 11:08 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Pretty much a wrap up for the theoretical discussion in this thread:
my Toyota Prius was delivered late Friday.
...
I'll post just this one last data point from practical use, for those
who might be interested, as the last message on this
I can't say from personal experience, but from the tests and samples
I've seen, it seems to be a fine lens. Not the best out there but a
good performer. It's build is far from that on FA which is rock
solid, also it is not made from metal, but it is said to be OK. Take
it with the graib of
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(for the non US readers, that's 51.8 MPImpG or 5.4L per 100 KM if
I got my conversion units correct).
That's darn good seeing as it's been a week of running many short
hops, two longish round trips through normal
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The difference can be seen. I can see it easily in the RAW files, and
could
easily see such differences with film as well.
A couple of years ago we were arguing about exposure accuracy, and you
took
the position that
Douglas Newman wrote:
I am, however, Paul Newman's grandson. But not THAT
Paul Newman ;-)...
Well, rats ... that would've been a possible in to see his race team up
close. It's better than me tho ... a franklin in medieval times was,
I'm told, a less than completely scrupulous money lender.
At 10:50 PM +0200 8/19/06, Matjaz Osojnik wrote:
Hi,
I have Minolta Dual Scan IV as well and am satisfied with it. It is a
good scanner, especially for the price. I can recommend it for all
but one: mine refuses to autofocus or manual focus. The focus on the
scans seems fine, although I'm not
- Original Message -
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
0.5 l/km is about ten times the fuel consumption of 5.4L per 100 Km ...
I meant L/10km
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 11:32:22PM +0200, P?l Jensen wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(for the non US readers, that's 51.8 MPImpG or 5.4L per 100 KM if
I got my conversion units correct).
That's darn good seeing as it's been a week of
That's some portefolio Pål :-)
Exelent work. Impressive!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pål
Jensen
Sent: 3. august 2006 16:20
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Some images...
I've put up about 20 images as a portfolio at Photo.net.
On 19/8/06, Tom Reese, discombobulated, unleashed:
What is the consensus of opinion for the PUG? I have a shot that I took
for the abandoned theme but I have something a hell of a lot better in
my archive.
It's heavily advised to shoot with some Pentax gear ;-
--
Cheers,
Cotty
--- Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It is significantly smaller than the D200 and will
give better image quality.
Smaller is OK, so long as it is not BIGGER :-).
I have heard it will be a metal body with
weather-sealing; if so I guess that would put it
roughly on par with the D200
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The K10D is likely going to be similar in size to
the D80, with build in between the D80 and D200.
The D80 (I have not paid much attention to it) is
similar in size to the D70? I can live with that.
The D70 feels like it is built fairly decently, if the
Douglas Newman wrote:
I have heard it will be a metal body with
weather-sealing; if so I guess that would put it
roughly on par with the D200 build-wise.
I think the K10D will be metal inside and plastic on the outside, just like
all previous Pentax DSLR's.
Yes, it is rumored it will have
I could not resist this beauty, even if I already had the pancake
40mm. My SMC PENTAX-FA 1:1.9 43mm Limited is new, and it's black :-)
The example below is not a great photo, but a decent snapshot, I
think. It is the first photo I took with the new lens. I have only
downsized it a bit, no
I wrote:
Compared to Nikon cameras, I expèect it to be much alike a 90D :-)
Please read:
Compared to Nikon cameras, I expect it to be much alike a D90 :-)
I mean its specifications will be slightly above the D80. Given the Pentax
way of doing stuff, I don't expect it will fully match the
By the metric you state below, your car uses about 10x the fuel that
the Prius does. I presume you mean to say L per 10Km, although I fail
to understand why you don't list L per 100Km like virtually all the
fuel economy statistics do. It's irrelevant, though, as the diesel A6
is/was not
I need a K1000 (pre-China) or KX or KM parts body.
Or if you have parts, (a) the cover for the frame counter and (b) the
bottom plate.
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
http://www.brendemuehl.net
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose
Burn 'im I say.
Scott Loveless wrote:
On 8/17/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NTW: I personally never liked Kodachrome.
Heretic.
;)
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
In a message dated 8/18/2006 6:50:18 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Along the same theme as the recent dew covered blossom, this very small
blossom is covered by actual morning dew. Note the droplet size
compared to the blossom..whatever it is.
Comments welcome.
Jack
In a message dated 8/18/2006 10:07:14 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I like it. If that's dirt, then dirt is for me.
-Brendan
==
Thanks!
Marnie :-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Douglas Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have heard it will be a metal body with
weather-sealing; if so I guess that would put it
roughly on par with the D200 build-wise.
REPLY:
I haven't heard anything about metal body but I doubt it based on the
rumored price.
In a message dated 8/19/2006 3:48:23 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
writes:
Marnie -
tell me, as close as you can, exactly where you were when
you took it
(the highway number, etc...)
I'll look up the formation in Roadside Geo for you :)
The lack of scale makes it hard to pin it
- Original Message -
From: Douglas Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The D80 (I have not paid much attention to it) is
similar in size to the D70? I can live with that.
REPLY:
It can be seen here:
http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/news/2006/press-image/200609-04.jpg
Pål
--
PDML
Looks quite sharp and nicely rendered. BTW, she's a real doll! Thanks
for the mammaries!
Paul
On Aug 19, 2006, at 6:22 PM, Bertil Holmberg wrote:
I could not resist this beauty, even if I already had the pancake
40mm. My SMC PENTAX-FA 1:1.9 43mm Limited is new, and it's black :-)
The
I've never used one. But a few people on this list have used them to
good effect. From their results I'd say it's a very fine lens, (subject
to sample variation of course).
Bill Lawlor wrote:
I'll be coming over to digital when the K10D hits the market. Does anyone on
the list have an
Pentax probably announced the rebate before it had any feedback on
demand. Now the company is stuck keeping it's word. Still it's better
to have more demand than you can handle than less...
Tom C wrote:
Simple solution. Put on more shifts. :-) Why would they be giving a
rebate if they
You probably should be asking about the DFA 100mm Macro since there's no
DA 100mm macro. I don't have the answer, though I'd assume that it's at
least as good as the FA it's replacing, but with the new focus clutch
system, and it has an aperture ring, unlike it's DA siblings
cbwaters wrote:
I don't know Shel. I like the idea. There is a lot of history in those
boxes.
But I'm very annoyed by the two boxes being upside down (purple in centre
and green at the right). I have a strong urge to turn them around.
This is kind of funny, me being annoyed by this; you should see my office,
Well seen Roman.
Think I've cropped off the feats of the widest shot if it was mine.
I find the bag and the sandals a bit distracting. They make a bit heavy at
the bottom.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after
John Forbes wrote:
Like everybody else (well, almost everybody), you'll get used to it after
a while, and then wonder why you ever thought having an aperture ring was
a good idea.
When I bought my PZ-1p way back around 1999 or so the most advanced
cameras I had used were the MX and ME Super.
http://www.amateurgeologist.com/shop/books_roadside.html
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml@pdml.net
Date: 8/19/2006 4:53:58 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - Nature's Sculpture
In a message dated 8/19/2006 3:48:23 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Marnie
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
