I'm sad to see my *istD go, but I'm ready to move on to either the K10D
or in the mean time the K100D. I would like to have the K100D as a
backup to the K10D when it comes out. Here is the link to the auction if
you guys are interested:
Hi Shel,
thanks.
I don't approve of all these abbreviations, and I never think about
them when I'm composing an email anyway. If people miss my pics, well
that's too bad for me I guess.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
I haev improved the first shot a little (different crop and some editing):
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/229851191/
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
nah... now why would I want to start another rumor...
Let me just enjoy my K100D until I can actually hold a K10D :)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On DPReview there is a gentleman who claims that his
local camera store in Portland, Maine showed him an
advertising flyer for the K10D with the following
specs:
- 10 Megapixels
That's hardly news...:-)
- ISO 100 to 3200
ISO 100? That's news.
- Shake Reduction
Given the K100D, that's
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Tom C wrote:
I don't know why anybody that has the mindset to shoot RAW format and spend
the time post-processing would also not want the max resolution they could
get. If file size is an overarching concern, trumping quality, then there's
other 6MP models they can buy.
Thanks, Shel.
You have made your point.
Would you like some coffee?
Jostein
On 8/31/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yawn
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Douglas Newman
On DPReview there is a gentleman who claims that his
local camera store in Portland, Maine
On the subject of the K10D, there's so many eddies in the the internet
flow that creating a summary of common knowledge could be fun.
AFAIK, a list of reasonably well established facts include:
10 Mpx
Anti-shake
Evolved K-mount
SD memory cards, with support for 2 GB cards.
Rumors, here and
I think 'approve' is the wrong word. Your approval doesn't matter one
way or the other. I don't use acronyms because I don't need them -- my
typing is fast enough. And I don't know them anyway. I think most stem
from days of yore when amateur radio operators (HAMS) used Morse code to
I know it's plural, but it is often used when people want a third person
singular pronoun which doesn't specify gender. The problem is that no
such word exists in English, and I, for one, rather hope that their
becomes more generally adopted to plug the gap.
Unless a better solution is on
.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 08:11:41 +0100, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On the subject of the K10D, there's so many eddies in the the internet
flow that creating a summary of common knowledge could be fun.
AFAIK, a list of reasonably well established facts include:
10 Mpx
Anti-shake
On 31.08.2006, at 08:58 , Jostein Øksne wrote:
ISO 100? That's news.
Hardly surprise as Sony A100 and Nikon D80 which probably use the
same sensor have iso100 ;-)
Hm. Noone has seen this coming, I think.
Recall one post from Rob written a few dayys ago and you'll be almost
sure it's true
It's not a question of whether you can type fast enough to type the whole
phrase in full. It's a matter of putting a searchable string in the
subject line so that people can use it to filter out the pictures.
John
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 08:22:12 +0100, Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 31.08.2006, at 09:44 , Jostein Øksne wrote:
.
:
Cheers,
Sylwek
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Aug 31, 2006, at 5:54 PM, Bob W wrote:
I would also have liked some sunlight on the grass.
That's what I was thinking. The sky seems to be a bit overpowering
in comparison.
- Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Haven't read it but I always assumed that one of the minor pluses of the Pentax
SR system was that it functioned as a rudimentary antidust system, too.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/08/31 Thu AM 03:59:55 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: K10D
That hadn't occurred to me. I apologise.
By the way, does IMHO imply that the writer has a dishonest opinion as
well? It's almost as bad as 'To tell you the truth' or 'To be truthful.'
The way our language is abused is often amusing and sometimes annoying.
Don
John Forbes wrote:
It's not a
Yes ... but I can't talk about it.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Jostein Øksne
On the subject of the K10D, there's so many eddies in the the internet
flow that creating a summary of common knowledge could be fun.
AFAIK, a list of reasonably well established facts include:
10 Mpx
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/Zeiss-HFT-85-1-4-Planar-for-Rollei-SLR-with-EOS-adapter_W0QQitemZ150026522391QQihZ005QQcategoryZ48552QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
Is this not the venerable lens that was compared to the A*85/1.4 on
this list a couple of years ago?
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Don Williams wrote:
By the way, does IMHO imply that the writer has a dishonest opinion as
Humble. As in Kate Humble.
Bob, please use PESO and PAW. Thanks.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
lol
You must have got the coffee, then. Posting at half past one in the morning...
Cheers,
Jostein
On 8/31/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes ... but I can't talk about it.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Jostein Øksne
On the subject of the K10D, there's so many eddies
I generally don't sleep much don't drink much coffee either, except
for an occasional cup of decaf.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Jostein Øksne
lol
You must have got the coffee, then. Posting at half past one in the
morning...
Cheers,
Jostein
On 8/31/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL
From: Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/08/31 Thu AM 08:30:20 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Kite -- acronyms
That hadn't occurred to me. I apologise.
By the way, does IMHO imply that the writer has a dishonest opinion as
well? It's almost as bad
On 31/8/06, Don Williams, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm not trying to start an argument,
merely making an observation.
Is this the five minute observation, or the full half-hour?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
I had the repairman at Pentax Norway to look at the images. According
to him, the damage is within a modular group of elements that should
be changed as a whole.
He explisitly told me he would not be able to just open it and clean
it, so I believe it is not an easy fix.
Jostein
On 8/31/06,
On Aug 31, 2006, at 4:41 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
Triangular aperture? Sold as seen @ $750?
Ridiculous price.
Yes, triangular aperture. The Contarex version of this lens and some
of the earlier ones for Rollei have a three-blade diaphragm. I never
knew why Zeiss used this very
QED -- Now you see why I don't use them -- with certain exceptions of
course.
mike wilson wrote:
From: Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/08/31 Thu AM 08:30:20 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Kite -- acronyms
That hadn't occurred to me. I apologise.
By
On Aug 30, 2006, at 10:38 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Look at the splotchy areas on the left and upper right. Very typical
of fungus growth. Element separations are usually more uniform in my
experience. It certainly won't hurt to send it to Colorado. But if it
were mine, and I had a reputable
I have four lenses on ebay: an M 50/4 macro, an SMC Pentax 85-210/4.5,
a Vivitar Series 1 70-210/3.5, and an FA 28-105/3.2-4.5. I like all of
these, but they're just not getting much use. The auctions end Sunday.
No bids so far, lots of watchers. No reserves, modest first bids. The
ebay URLs
Excellent. Thanks much for this resource.
Paul
On Aug 30, 2006, at 11:38 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
The best lens person in the US who I would send any lens with that
kind of growth on it to is John Van Stelton at Focal Point:
http://www.focalpointlens.com/
Anyone who values their lenses
Rob, who admits to having seen a press release, confirmed that it has a
battery grip.
When I searched the web for rumors, I found continued reference to
extended dynamic range and advanced noise reduction. Both of these are
apparently detailed in patents filed by Pentax. They also seem to be
Wow! Great job setting up your auction page. Excellent pics too. It
will be interesting to see what it goes for. I was surprised by how
much mine brought.
Paul
On Aug 31, 2006, at 2:00 AM, Gonz wrote:
I'm sad to see my *istD go, but I'm ready to move on to either the K10D
or in the mean
HAR!
On Aug 31, 2006, at 4:37 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Yes ... but I can't talk about it.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Jostein Øksne
On the subject of the K10D, there's so many eddies in the the internet
flow that creating a summary of common knowledge could be fun.
AFAIK, a list
On 8/31/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob, who admits to having seen a press release, confirmed that it has a
battery grip.
When I searched the web for rumors, I found continued reference to
extended dynamic range and advanced noise reduction. Both of these are
apparently
On 31.08.2006, at 12:56 , Jostein Øksne wrote:
So while I cannot and will not blatantly disclose what I have been
told in confidence, I'm happy to serve as a chaos pilot and summarise
those things that are already well established in the public domain.
But I haven't read all the threads
At 07:36 PM 31/08/2006, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Check the 'ordered m K10 today'. Rob is dropping heavy hints (about
weather sealing, mainly), and someone called 'gerasimov' from Bulgaria
posted a credible list of features containing a 22 bit A/D coverter. That
could be Aaron's 67-ditching
Op Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:34:22 +0200 schreef Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Rob, who admits to having seen a press release, confirmed that it has a
battery grip.
When I searched the web for rumors, I found continued reference to
extended dynamic range and advanced noise reduction. Both of
On 31.08.2006, at 13:36 , Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Over at digitalfotonetz.de someone has been prying around in his
K100's
mount, and found pre-drilled holes at the location of the former
powerzoom
contacts. As the DS and DL definately do not have this, assumption
is the
K10 will share
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Bob Shell wrote:
I never
knew why Zeiss used this very odd design. It does produce
triangular out of focus highlights.
Have you got a sample photo to share perhaps?
Thanks,
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Welcome back :-)
No comment on the lens.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill
Owens
Sent: 31. august 2006 13:50
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Tamron 28-300
Just before I fell ill, I purchased a
Just before I fell ill, I purchased a Tamron 28-300 for an everyday
walkaround lens. I still haven't had a chance to really use it, but does
anyone here have this lens and if so, what's your opinion of it.
Bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
No idea about the lens but good to see you back.
From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/08/31 Thu AM 11:49:31 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Tamron 28-300
Just before I fell ill, I purchased a Tamron 28-300 for an everyday
walkaround lens. I still haven't had a chance to really
BILL!!!
So Very Happy to have you back.
Cory
- Original Message -
From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 7:49 AM
Subject: Tamron 28-300
Just before I fell ill, I purchased a Tamron 28-300 for an everyday
walkaround lens. I
From: Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But I haven't read all the threads thoroughly over the last weeks (I
have had very prominent guests in my house, and they have of course
had the right of way.), so I'd be grateful for help in gathering the
bits.
I've already said I'm on a diet! 8-(((
On 8/31/06 7:49 AM, Sylwester Pietrzyk, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly, space for powerzoom contacts was provided in K100D
prototype, but it seems it disappeared in production K100D...
People in Japan are reporting the same thing. They say the holes are sealed
but could be pried open, but
On 31/08/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hows the chin Rob?, feeling better? Yes!
Time for another uppercut.
I'm fine, some interesting information is surfacing though!
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Forbes wrote:
[...] I, for one, rather hope that their
becomes more generally adopted to plug the gap.
I kinda like s/h/it for the singular. Since I'm southern, y'all
works for plural. ;-
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Op Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:14:57 +0200 schreef Digital Image Studio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 31/08/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hows the chin Rob?, feeling better? Yes!
Time for another uppercut.
I'm fine, some interesting information is surfacing though!
:o)
Anyone care to make
On 31.08.2006, at 14:15 , K.Takeshita wrote:
I guess what's happening is that the mount component is shared
between K100D
and K10D but those two contacts are disabled for K100D.
Speculation (with
some wishful thinking) is that these are definitely for USM (which
is pretty
well
Thanks Ken.
I had already cropped out a leg on the right, i quess a bit more would
not hurt.
Dave
Quoting Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Nice capture. Sure fits the lead in description.
If it were mine I'd crop out some on the RH side.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
At 08:14 PM 31/08/2006, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 31/08/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hows the chin Rob?, feeling better? Yes!
Time for another uppercut.
I'm fine, some interesting information is surfacing though!
I've been out of the loop the last couple of days so
Hi!
Just before I fell ill, I purchased a Tamron 28-300 for an everyday
walkaround lens. I still haven't had a chance to really use it,
but does
anyone here have this lens and if so, what's your opinion of it.
No help with the lens, but man, I'm glad to see you!!!
Boris
--
PDML
On 31.08.2006, at 14:31 , Lucas Rijnders wrote:
:o)
Anyone care to make an educated guess to RAW speed buffer given that
JPEG is 3 fps 'streaming'?
Well, if K10D is going to be 2x better camera than original *istD,
then it should have the buffer for RAWs twice as big ;-)
Cheers,
Sylwek
I always thought that IMHO stood for in my humble opinion though I
suppose that you could interpret your way.
Don Williams wrote:
That hadn't occurred to me. I apologise.
By the way, does IMHO imply that the writer has a dishonest opinion as
well? It's almost as bad as 'To tell you the truth'
Op Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:15:42 +0200 schreef K.Takeshita
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 8/31/06 7:49 AM, Sylwester Pietrzyk, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly, space for powerzoom contacts was provided in K100D
prototype, but it seems it disappeared in production K100D...
snip
Speculation (with
-
Jostein Øksne wrote:
.
--
Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.
--Albert Einstein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 31.08.2006, at 14:38 , Lucas Rijnders wrote:
They won't. Sharing between K10 and K100 is a more logical
explanation.
And don't forget Pentax seems to be on a 6 month replacement cycle
with
the lower end bodies. Enabling USM on the K100 for PMA (K100s?
K200?) is
quite easy now...
A friend of mine has a copy that she uses on a Canon digital Rebel.
It's an alright lens, the results are acceptable. I've played with it a
bit and it seems to be well made, though based on my SMC Pentax 28-200
which is of a similar build made by Tamron, (maybe a bit more robust),
it may not
- Original Message -
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It would be interesting to have possibility of adapting K100D for USM
lenses ;-) But it is also possible that they planned to include USM
support in K100D and dropped it because it wasn't complete and they
wanted to
On 31.08.2006, at 14:54 , Pål Jensen wrote:
Maybe the contacts pop out the moment you mount an USM lens?
I don't think so. In the patent that I found a few years ago these
contacts were used to drive powerzoom lenses too. So if K10D would
support USM lenses we could expect it to support
Hey dude,
D'you fink your'e the only one?
Jostein :-(
On 8/31/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But I haven't read all the threads thoroughly over the last weeks (I
have had very prominent guests in my house, and they have of course
had the
Op Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:56:06 +0200 schreef Sylwester Pietrzyk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 31.08.2006, at 14:38 , Lucas Rijnders wrote:
They won't. Sharing between K10 and K100 is a more logical
explanation.
And don't forget Pentax seems to be on a 6 month replacement cycle
with
the lower end
On 8/31/06 9:14 AM, Sylwester Pietrzyk, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the patent that I found a few years ago these
contacts were used to drive powerzoom lenses too.
Those hidden contact (for K100D) are exactly where the PZ contacts used to
be.
Ken
P.S.
Sealing of these contacts are not
On 8/31/06, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe the contacts pop out the moment you mount an USM lens?
Hm.
I think that would mean that all the old powerzoom lenses would be
unusable on the K10D. That seems unlikely, imo.
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 8/31/06, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two wheels. Like the D.
Fact or speculation?
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 8/31/06, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone care to make an educated guess to RAW speed buffer given that
JPEG is 3 fps 'streaming'?
So... 3fps is a fact?
Streaming JPEGs meaning no buffer congestion for JPEG? Fact or rumor?
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 31/08/06, K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S.
Sealing of these contacts are not exactly the duct tape job, but I gathered
that they are plugged some type of resin or something.
May be it is a matter of removing those materials and upgrade the firmware?
I vote this post for
On 31.08.2006, at 15:12 , Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Of course the Dynax 9 was a pro camera (if I understood Minolta's
numbering scheme correctly), while the K100 is at the absolute low
end of
the DSLR market. Different customers, and different amounts of
customers...
I guess it would be
Op Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:27:03 +0200 schreef Jostein Øksne
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 8/31/06, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone care to make an educated guess to RAW speed buffer given that
JPEG is 3 fps 'streaming'?
So... 3fps is a fact?
Apologies: rumour from an unconfirmed
Based on the floaters from the previous thread, here's an update.
The wish from John Forbes for a two-wheel interface aka *istD and
(P)Z-1p seems so likely I threw it into facts at face value. Rob's
battery grip goes in there as well, along with the claim of 3fps,
which also seems very likely,
Op Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:22:13 +0200 schreef Jostein Øksne
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 8/31/06, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two wheels. Like the D.
Fact or speculation?
Fact. Check out the PMA and PIE photo's that have been online since last
febuary.
--
Regards, Lucas
--
PDML
On 8/31/06 9:23 AM, Digital Image Studio, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May be it is a matter of removing those materials and upgrade the firmware?
I vote this post for prediction of the month, nice going Ken ;-)
Actually, the remark was with a bit of tongue-in-cheek which did not come
out so
Very good synopsis. You are well organized, aren't you:-)
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Based on the floaters from the previous thread, here's an update.
The wish from John Forbes for a two-wheel interface aka *istD and
On 31.08.2006, at 15:39 , Jostein Øksne wrote:
Facts:
10 Mpx
Anti-shake
Evolved K-mount
SD memory cards, with support for 2 GB cards.
Battery grip
HyperProgram (two wheels)
3 fps
Speculations:
Proprietary Li-Ion battery
The evolution of K-mount is for in-lens AF motors
Anti-dust
On 8/31/06 9:39 AM, Jostein Øksne, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then came all the observations of powerzoom contacts present in K100D.
Was the subject on the power zoom feature?
I thought people were talking about using these contacts for USM drive.
I thought PZ itself is a dead issue (can see no
Op Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:39:17 +0200 schreef Jostein Øksne
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Based on the floaters from the previous thread, here's an update.
The wish from John Forbes for a two-wheel interface aka *istD and
(P)Z-1p seems so likely I threw it into facts at face value. Rob's
battery grip
On 8/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very good synopsis. You are well organized, aren't you:-)
Um... Don't ask my wife that question, please...
Meanwhile, the HyP got further support from Lucas with reference to
published images, so that's now an established fact, while the
On 8/31/06, K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was the subject on the power zoom feature?
I thought people were talking about using these contacts for USM drive.
I thought PZ itself is a dead issue (can see no reason to resurrect it,
particularly if Pentax are planning to equip lenses with
On 01/09/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very good synopsis. You are well organized, aren't you:-)
Um... Don't ask my wife that question, please...
Meanwhile, the HyP got further support from Lucas with reference to
I really do not want to stir the pot any further, but I just encountered a
post in Japan that reported that;
[He went to Pentax Forum (Sort of central service centre in Tokyo) to get
the sensor cleaned. He tried to steer people there into the discussion on
K10D, by telling that he was concerned
Chuck it.
Dave
On 8/31/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what do you think, should we keep the PowerZoom in the rumor pool,
or throw it out all together?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
More proof of HyP.
But there's new acronym on that dial too; Sv.
Jostein
On 8/31/06, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/09/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very good synopsis. You are well organized, aren't
On 8/31/06 10:04 AM, Jostein Øksne, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what do you think, should we keep the PowerZoom in the rumor pool,
or throw it out all together?
If you ask me, I would throw PZ rumour out ;-).
Ken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Aug 30, 2006, at 8:38 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
The best lens person in the US who I would send any lens with that
kind of growth on it to is John Van Stelton at Focal Point:
http://www.focalpointlens.com/
Anyone who values their lenses should keep that URL handy! They
normally do
On 31.08.2006, at 16:10 , Digital Image Studio wrote:
An then there's the pic following found on the following thread:
http://www.converse.ru/img/460805808.jpg
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=19822373
Yes it's a Sumdung but check out the mode dial
Sv? Could it
On 8/31/06, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/09/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very good synopsis. You are well organized, aren't you:-)
Um... Don't ask my wife that question, please...
Meanwhile,
From: Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/08/31 Thu PM 01:09:00 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Re: K10D - facts and speculations
Hey dude,
D'you fink your'e the only one?
Jostein :-(
8-( indeed. Been out on my bicycle twice, leaving a
Op Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:17:42 +0200 schreef David Savage
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 8/31/06, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/09/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very good synopsis. You are well organized,
From: K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/08/31 Thu PM 01:56:06 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: K10D Facts and speculations v2
On 8/31/06 9:39 AM, Jostein Øksne, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then came all the observations of powerzoom contacts present in
Although not in your case vbg LOL GDR
Shel
[Original Message]
From: mike wilson
By the way, does IMHO imply that the writer has a dishonest opinion as
well? It's almost as bad as 'To tell you the truth' or 'To be
truthful.'
The way our language is abused is often amusing and
From: K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/08/31 Thu PM 02:21:54 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: K10D Facts and speculations v2
On 8/31/06 10:04 AM, Jostein Øksne, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what do you think, should we keep the PowerZoom in the rumor
On 31.08.2006, at 16:21 , K.Takeshita wrote:
If you ask me, I would throw PZ rumour out ;-).
In KAF3 patent both lenses were usable - USM and Powerzoom ones. It
was easy to implement as both use the same, good, old PZ contacts for
power.
Cheers,
Sylwek
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Hi guys - been lurking and not managing to keep up with the list for
some time but starting to get K10D urges!
From Roland Mabo:
10.2Mp APS-C sized sensor
Hardware noise-killing processing (The K10D will have the lowest noise
at high ISO of all the 10Mp cameras, thank's to new noise-killing
Op Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:20:05 +0200 schreef K.Takeshita
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I really do not want to stir the pot any further, but I just encountered
a
post in Japan that reported that;
[He went to Pentax Forum (Sort of central service centre in Tokyo) to get
the sensor cleaned. He tried
On 31.08.2006, at 16:34 , mike wilson wrote:
Not for USM drive directly but power for the USM motor. There
would have to be some sensor/logic coupling, also, to achieve
focus. So I would assume more contacts in the bayonet.
Mike, I think one digital contact in mount as used in F, FA and
This looks to be what Aaron and the other insiders saw. Thanks.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Rob Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi guys - been lurking and not managing to keep up with the list for
some time but starting to get K10D urges!
From Roland Mabo:
Full metal body (Metal outside and inside, inspired by MZ-S
construction)
This is extremely unlikely and unthinkable at the rumored price.
BTW The whole list is just an assemblages of the rumors floating around
Pål
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/08/31 Thu PM 02:20:46 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: K10D Facts and speculations v2
More proof of HyP.
But there's new acronym on that dial too; Sv.
And TAv?
Jostein
On 8/31/06, Digital Image Studio
- Original Message -
From: K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So my real vote is no USM capability for the K100D :-).
Many people might wish this be wrong and I have absolutely no foundation
in
predicting anything on this.
The problem I have with this is that it is at odds with Pentax
1 - 100 of 359 matches
Mail list logo
