I had one of those a couple of years ago - it was one of the most
enjoyable cars to drive I've ever had. It was like an eager little
puppy, really wanted to go out all the time, was fast, responsive,
economical - just a great car I thought.
--
Bob
You definitely won't want to see this clip
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/11/24 Fri PM 08:27:38 GMT
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: OT - Prius Fuel Economy
That would be like
going back to mixture and advance and retard levers on
infernal combustion engines.
to indicate to the engine
Hi,
thanks to all for the quick and accurate responses. Especially Stan for
the reference! I remember having seen the site before, but my
bookmarking is messy...
About the lens, there seems to be no conclusion about the quality, but
the general advise is not to spend much money on it, so
Thanks Mark. I've found the grain or digital noise to be minimal at
ISO 800. My initial impression is that it's less noisy than the *srD
I'm going to print the musician pic. i'll know more when I see that.
Paul
On Nov 25, 2006, at 12:53 AM, Mark Cassino wrote:
Nice shots Paul - does a good
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/11/24 Fri PM 11:32:47 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT - Prius Fuel Economy
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: OT - Prius Fuel Economy
I agree, however, that the
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
.. and it's not my pic. Sent by a friend. Thought you may get a laugh or
two from it.
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/It's_Not_My_Job.jpg
Shel
This URL won't work for me.
I thought it was the apostrophe, and tried it without it. Earthlink
still won't process
Jostein Oksne - the PDML Jewish Girl... Guys, that's hilarious...
By the full name of Jo Stein...
:-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 25/11/06, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had one of those a couple of years ago - it was one of the most
enjoyable cars to drive I've ever had. It was like an eager little
puppy, really wanted to go out all the time, was fast, responsive,
economical - just a great car I thought.
If you
On 24/11/06, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
one of our major
problems was that Jeep had become a generic name for 4x4 SUVs
It's gone full circle. It started out as a generic term before it became
trademarked as you know. I owned a CJ7 for a couple of years and loved
it. A CJ-5 is
On 25/11/06, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
That's another thing I hate. When corporations trademark common usage terms.
...like fuckface.
Sorry, I mean FuckFace (t).
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/11/25 Sat AM 02:00:19 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: K10D Sharpening
I've used well over 100% many times. With the *istD photos, I
generally used 261% at 1.5 pixels and a threshold of 11.
Do you use that
On Nov 24, 2006, at 8:27 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I agree. Substitutions are a problem in modern society. As are brand
impeachments. I worked on Jeep advertising, and one of our major
problems was that Jeep had become a generic name for 4x4 SUVs. This
was particularly true in Europe. We
On 11/25/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are still places on Earth where the CJ-3 is made under license
(India for one I think - Mahindra)
here in india, the jeep *is* synonymous with the Willys utility
vehicle (it is not generic) and, as you point out, the mahindra
derivatives (most
On 11/25/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25/11/06, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
That's another thing I hate. When corporations trademark common usage terms.
...like fuckface.
Sorry, I mean FuckFace (t).
Har!
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I personally would not buy a pre-AF zoom lens again, however,
particularly for the K100D or K10D bodies, as without the focal
length information transmitted from lens to body, obtaining benefit
from the antishake technology is a bit more of a pain than I would
be interested in. It's
If you could keep the detail in the white fur around the nose in the first and
combine with with the rest of the second, that would be my choice. Otherwise,
the second.
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/11/25 Sat AM 04:07:25 GMT
To: PDML PDML@pdml.net
Subject: PESO - Which
On Nov 25, 2006, at 12:51 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
Jeep is a generic term that Willys co-opted then spent years turning
into a brand. That gives them and their successor companies exactly
zero
right to bitch when people use the term genericly as far as I'm
concerned.
Before the vehicle
On Nov 25, 2006, at 12:44 AM, David Savage wrote:
Chrysler are victims of their own marketing then. Jeep has now entered
the English language, they will forever be defending the trademark.
It's the same problem that Apple is having with it's i-Pod trademark.
Look at the number of mp3
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/11/25 Sat AM 04:46:25 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Windows Computer Questions
On 11/25/06, Mat Maessen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Though saying that, I would not touch Vista for at least another six
months.
Hi!
That never occurred to me until you mentioned it, that could have some
serious consequences. I'm not to bothered by the M A zooms, I only have
four M 24-35, M 35-70, A 35-105 and A 70-210. But if the Sigma 70-200/2.8 EX
doesn't communicate the correct information it's going to be a
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Wow, are you speaking of USM or Smart Sharpening?
With the DS bodies, I have almost never applied more than 80-90%
sharpening with Smart Sharpening. More than that causes artifacts and
problems in most photos. A very few have required pounding up the
sharpening to
I was in the city a couple of months ago and went to buy some Indian Red
'touch up' paint for my car from the Audi Dealer. I saw about 3 million
Euro worth of Audi lined up outside and a rather spectacular red one
inside. I took a few dozen pictures. Here are two:
On 11/25/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been running the Vista Beta on my old machine for a month now, if
it's got any bug's I've yet to run across them.
Your _old_ machine will run Vista? I know people whose _new_ machines won't.
From: Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/11/25 Sat AM 10:37:19 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO:the secret weapon of the Swiss navy
Jostein Oksne - the PDML Jewish Girl... Guys, that's hilarious...
By the full name of Jo Stein...
:-)
I was
We all KNOW he has a point. We just don't need it to be repeated ad
infinitum (and with increasing levels of obscenity), by him or by you or
by anybody else. We have ALL had it up to the eyeballs with this, and it
is surprising to me that you are attempting to prolong the thread by your
Hi!
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=273691
...and a question: Something in this picture reminds me of some movie
or album cover, but I´ve got no idea which. Annoying...
Dag, this is quite wonderful indeed.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hi Boris
John, I have *istD and Tamron 28-75/2.8 you mentioned. Though of
course *istD has no anti shake, but still, all my PEFs display
correct focal length in their EXIF information. This leads me to
believe that Tamron is fine. It is worth mentioning that FA 28-105
IF (the first
Hi Kevin,
I tried when I got it some years ago, it does not work for IR. I then
used my PZ1-p and worked fine.
Regards
Angel Ramos
Arecibo, Puerto Rico
Kevin Waterson wrote:
Does anybody know If High Speed Infrared Emulsion film can be used
with the MZ-S?
Does the internal infrared mechanism
On 11/25/06 7:29 AM, Don Williams, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
having owned so many (including an original US
Army Jeep and two Land Rovers) that they fail to thrill me now.
Are you sure you are not talking about girls, are you? :-)
Ken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Is the baseplate photograph of the K10D on DPReview.com not adequate?
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/PentaxK10D/Images/base.jpg
Godfrey
On Nov 24, 2006, at 10:36 PM, David Savage wrote:
Anyone?
Dave
On 11/22/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day,
Could someone please make a
opens fine here in both Safari and FireFox.
G
On Nov 25, 2006, at 2:26 AM, keith_w wrote:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
.. and it's not my pic. Sent by a friend. Thought you may get a
laugh or
two from it.
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/It's_Not_My_Job.jpg
Shel
This URL won't work for
On Nov 25, 2006, at 4:07 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Like Godfrey, I've also made the transition to the Smart Sharpen
tool
for most of my work. Trouble (for most people) is, it's even more
esoteric than the unsharp mask tool, which is difficult enough to
get a
handle on.
But both tools'
Interesting, thanks. As Cotty noted, that's essentially the same as the
old CJ-3. The current version sold in the US is called Jeep Wrangler.
It's even better off road but too civilized for the die-hard Jeep fans.
Paul
On Nov 25, 2006, at 6:21 AM, SJ wrote:
On 11/25/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LOL, I have one!
Angel Ramos
Arecibo Puerto Rico
David Savage wrote:
Needs a cat.
Dave
On 11/25/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about not only hijacking a thread but combining several topics into
it at the same time?
Here's my attempt:
On important work I do it locally and incrementally. On general run of
the mill stuff, I sometimes just whack it in and see what it looks like
at 200% or so.
Paul
On Nov 25, 2006, at 6:02 AM, mike wilson wrote:
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/11/25 Sat AM 02:00:19 GMT
To:
On Nov 25, 2006, at 3:21 AM, John Whittingham wrote:
I personally would not buy a pre-AF zoom lens again, however,
particularly for the K100D or K10D bodies, as without the focal
length information transmitted from lens to body, obtaining benefit
from the antishake technology is a bit more of
I agree. I definitely prefer the increased detail of the second. You
might try burning in the white area around the nose a bit.
On Nov 25, 2006, at 6:38 AM, mike wilson wrote:
If you could keep the detail in the white fur around the nose in the
first and combine with with the rest of the
Lately I've been applying the sharpening to a copy of the background
layer that has had the high pass filter applied the layer blending
mode changed to soft light. By adjusting the layer's opacity using
layer masks it's possible to do non destructive localised sharpening.
Dave
On 11/25/06,
I don't think you have to worry about that! Phil Askey's product
photos are pretty darn good. :-)
Godfrey
On Nov 25, 2006, at 5:57 AM, David Savage wrote:
Thanks Godfrey I'd forgotten about that.
Though I'll have to assume that the shot is square.
Dave
On 11/25/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi
Thanks Godfrey I'd forgotten about that.
Though I'll have to assume that the shot is square.
Dave
On 11/25/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the baseplate photograph of the K10D on DPReview.com not adequate?
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/PentaxK10D/Images/base.jpg
Godfrey
Very nice. The figure in the foreground makes it special.
Paul
On Nov 25, 2006, at 12:36 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: OT: Windows Computer Questions
At the present time, there are very few solutions that benefit from
64bit instructions and 64bit data. Processing huge datasets (I mean
REALLY huge ... Gigabytes of data at a time) are one
William,
I have used my PZ1-p without a problem, and it has a plastic window. I
never had a problem with it!
Regards
Angel Ramos
Arecibo, Puerto Rico
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Waterson
Subject: Re: MZ-S and HSIE film
Thankfully I always carry a
Quoting David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Given that the D100 *istD use the same sensor the D100 DIY kit may work???
But that depends on how confident you are at being able to
successfully pull it apart.
None at all
And then put it back together ;-)
More than none at all.
Dave
Dave
On
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: Pentax 1.8 85mm
On 25/11/06, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
That's another thing I hate. When corporations trademark common usage
terms.
...like fuckface.
Sorry, I mean FuckFace (t).
Fuckface is the registered trademark
On Nov 23, 2006, at 10:25 AM, mike wilson wrote:
I assume digital protocols make it far easier for OEMs to put
little pitfalls in the way of third parties.
Mechanical pitfalls are more subtle to create but harder for third
parties to accommodate since they can vary more on a unit by unit
Hm...paint it red, get rid of the top and turn signals and it looks
just like the CJ-2A I had about 1960.
-P
SJ wrote:
On 11/25/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are still places on Earth where the CJ-3 is made under license
(India for one I think - Mahindra)
here in india,
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 08:51:15 -0500
Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting, thanks. As Cotty noted, that's essentially the same as
the old CJ-3. The current version sold in the US is called Jeep
Wrangler. It's even better off road but too civilized for the
die-hard Jeep fans.
On Nov 25, 2006, at 6:11 AM, William Robb wrote:
At the present time, there are very few solutions that benefit from
64bit instructions and 64bit data. Processing huge datasets (I mean
REALLY huge ... Gigabytes of data at a time) are one thing, but
processing a hundred or two 20 Mbyte RAW
Keith,
Do a copy paste to the whole line. The problem is that the actual link
ius missing a part, you can also click the link and copy-paste the part
missing from the linl ( the not colores undelined section of the
complete line).
Angel Ramos
Arecibo, Puerto Rico
keith_w wrote:
Shel
On 11/25/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, the exact same thing has happened with Hummer (which
originated as military slang for a HMMWV).
That's not quite right. When the HMMWV first started replacing Jeeps
and some other tactical vehicles in the 80's it immediately earned
As long as the correct focal length appears in the EXIF data,
everything should work all right. I have not specifically tested the
case with the Pentax Rear Converter-A 2x-S fitted behind a lens
known to transmit the correct data.
Thanks Godfrey, I reckon I'll just have to wait and
As they stand, the second. I think the higher contrast supports the
look in its eye better.
Jostein
On 11/25/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree. I definitely prefer the increased detail of the second. You
might try burning in the white area around the nose a bit.
On Nov 25,
Thanks Boris.
On Nov 25, 2006, at 12:39 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Another K10d pic at ISO 800, FA 50/1.4, f2.8 @ 1/180th. Window light.
Plus one half stop exposure comp with matrix metering. Even at 100%
the noise is barely detectable here.
John Whittingham wrote:
Thanks for that information, it's reassuring to know. I'm sure I read
somewhere that the Sigma 300/4 APO is recognised as FA 300/4.5
It certainly is. However, with the matching 1.4x and 2x EX converters
it still shows up as 300mm. I'm not sure if that would
William Robb wrote:
We'll be processing as many as 500 6-10mp files into 3000 or more 8x10
package prints.
Gigabytes at a time is a pretty close assessment.
Right now, it takes us about an hour of computer time to do it. I'd like
to speed things up a bit.
William Robb
If you are
On Nov 25, 2006, at 7:42 AM, Mark Cassino wrote:
We'll be processing as many as 500 6-10mp files into 3000 or more
8x10
package prints.
Gigabytes at a time is a pretty close assessment.
Right now, it takes us about an hour of computer time to do it.
I'd like
to speed things up a bit.
On 11/25/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 25, 2006, at 7:42 AM, Mark Cassino wrote:
We'll be processing as many as 500 6-10mp files into 3000 or more
8x10
package prints.
Gigabytes at a time is a pretty close assessment.
Right now, it takes us about an hour of
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Nov 24, 2006, at 9:58 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
Note that GM didn't want to build the thing in the first place.
They didn't. They fought the concept all the way, even though the
EV-1 was an exceptionally good car. I did drive a couple of them. It
was stable,
On 25/11/06, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Interesting, thanks. As Cotty noted, that's essentially the same as the
old CJ-3. The current version sold in the US is called Jeep Wrangler.
It's even better off road but too civilized for the die-hard Jeep fans.
Too right.
Now these
With the K100, I'm usually at 3, 100%, but I often oversharpen a bit for
effect.
-Adam
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Usually, my sharpening for full or doubled resolution normal image
files with Smart Sharpen is pixels: 2.1, 80-90%, basic mode. A
similar result with USM happens at pixels:1.7,
On 25/11/06, Don Williams, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm less of a motor
car person these days having owned so many (including an original US
Army Jeep and two Land Rovers) that they fail to thrill me now.
Yer a hard man Doc.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Nov 25, 2006, at 7:42 AM, Mark Cassino wrote:
We'll be processing as many as 500 6-10mp files into 3000 or more
8x10
package prints.
Gigabytes at a time is a pretty close assessment.
Right now, it takes us about an hour of computer time to do it.
I'd like
On 25/11/06, SJ, discombobulated, unleashed:
and i hope, this is not getting too OT
Welcome to the PDML :-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 25/11/06, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Fuckface is the registered trademark of the
Incompetent Lying Abusing Punk Thug Coward Mental Cases Corp.
WW
North American division? In the UK I have seen it used by Total Wazzock
And Tosser Ltd.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O)
David Savage wrote:
On 11/25/06, Mat Maessen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Though saying that, I would not touch Vista for at least another six
months. Let the bugs get fleshed out, and wait until Microsoft issues
Service Pack 1 at least.
Windows have been Beta testing it for quite some time now
On Nov 25, 2006, at 8:12 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
125 mile range is useful only as a commuter, and even that's iffy in
many places (125 mile commutes aren't unheard of here in Southern
Ontario). That essentially makes it a second car (As people will
want to
drive longer distances in one go). a
On Nov 25, 2006, at 8:40 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
OS X is the same 2GB limit for PS, but you do get an advantage up to
about 3GB by allowing other processes to have RAM and have
Photoshop eat
up the full amount it can address. I'd say that 4GB would be about the
maximum you'd want to install
On 11/25/06, SJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and i hope, this is not getting too OT
No such thing as too off topic.
:-)
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I'm more than happy to boast your self esteem Boris ;-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Boris Liberman
Sent: 25. november 2006 06:31
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: I feel cool today
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Nov 25, 2006, at 8:12 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
BTW: if you are really spending 5-6 hours per day continuous in a
passenger car just to go about your daily business of just getting to
and from work, well, you have other problems in my opinion. !! :-)
..
Godfrey
Interesting, thanks. As Cotty noted, that's essentially the
same as the
old CJ-3. The current version sold in the US is called Jeep
Wrangler.
It's even better off road but too civilized for the die-hard
Jeep fans.
Too right.
Now these are more like it ;-)))
Opening today. No bubbles, but I did not really expecting any.
It was crowded, much more people than I expected. My pictures did not hang
very well. They where in a cupboard sized hall. The background was a black,
and a red piece of clothing. On of the managers of the festival, a guy who
works
Change the running lights paint it olive drab, cast the movie set in wwII.
SJ wrote:
On 11/25/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are still places on Earth where the CJ-3 is made under license
(India for one I think - Mahindra)
here in india, the jeep *is* synonymous with the
The responses to JCO have been intended to inflame, you're the one who's
prolonging it now, just let it die. It stopped being amusing quite some
time ago.
John Forbes wrote:
We all KNOW he has a point. We just don't need it to be repeated ad
infinitum (and with increasing levels of
On Nov 25, 2006, at 9:06 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
BTW: if you are really spending 5-6 hours per day continuous in a
passenger car just to go about your daily business of just getting to
and from work, well, you have other problems in my opinion. !! :-)
Just a note, but with 100kph limits on the
Very cool indeed! Congratulations.
--
Bruce
Friday, November 24, 2006, 11:07:37 AM, you wrote:
TØ You may remember that I told about my first public showing? It was some rock
TØ festival images showed at a hotel.
TØ I just got a phone from one of those who work with the festival. She asked
Actually it was AM General that built the Humvee, not GM. GM bought the
rights to build the military Humvee as Hummers and tied the name to
further development of civilian vehicle's based on current GM chassis.
Scott Loveless wrote:
On 11/25/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of
Angel Ramos wrote:
Keith,
Do a copy paste to the whole line. The problem is that the actual link
ius missing a part, you can also click the link and copy-paste the part
missing from the linl ( the not colores undelined section of the
complete line).
Angel Ramos
Arecibo, Puerto Rico
A
We'll be processing as many as 500 6-10mp files into 3000 or more 8x10
package prints.
Gigabytes at a time is a pretty close assessment.
Right now, it takes us about an hour of computer time to do it. I'd like
to speed things up a bit.
-
Bill, maybe I'm missing something, but isn't your
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: OT - Prius Fuel Economy
Technically, I don't think your reservations about the batteries in
cold climates are that big a deal (block heaters are regularly used
for ICEs in such environments, no reason you couldn't do the
In a message dated 11/16/2006 12:55:19 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If
Budweiser were the only beer in the world it would be the best beer in the
world.
==
Not true.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter
Subject: OT: Windows Computer Questions
Bill, maybe I'm missing something, but isn't your slowest component
for
such jobs going to be the printer?
We can't do anything about that, unfortunately, but we would like to
address as many
..and the worst. MGD..YES!
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/16/2006 12:55:19 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If
Budweiser were the only beer in the world it would be the best beer
in the
world.
==
Not true.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
--
In a message dated 11/24/2006 11:29:31 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
IS, VR, Shake reduction, etc. They are all the
same concept ( done in either lenses or bodies )
with different trade names
jco
===
Sigh. Against my better judgment, I respond.
They are different.
In a message dated 11/22/2006 7:49:35 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I got on photo net more than a year ago
the one thing that pisses me off is that little dog icon at the bottom
of the page even in my portfolio --
friends have asked me about the dog -- snapping on the
Hi Christian
It certainly is. However, with the matching 1.4x and 2x EX
converters it still shows up as 300mm. I'm not sure if that would
adversely effect SR (600mm vs 420mm vs 300mm). As a point of
example, the Canon 300/4 and 1.4x converter show as 420mm in the
EXIF data and the
In a message dated 11/22/2006 1:43:33 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://pictures.aol.com/galleries/cskofteland/99500WUnDg8Cvgp5n8dJIpAC7pvZDt2o
Pt9uv4xQp5Fd3Ig=/large/
http://tinyurl.com/ya9dta
Yes it's AOL, but there are surprisingly no ads in this view...
Thanks
Feels nice.
Pentax got the construction right. Good job, Pentax.
Size feel are great.
I drool.
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
http://www.brendemuehl.net
http://evangelicalperspective.blogspot.com
http://philosophyforchristians.blogspot.com
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain
Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
Feels nice.
Pentax got the construction right. Good job, Pentax.
Size feel are great.
I drool.
Boy, they did get it right, didn't they?
This camera is a real breakthrough for Pentax as far as build
quality/feel is concerned.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I must say I like this... Not sure I would ever use it in public lest
it get stolen by some rapper.
http://www.engadget.com/2006/11/23/pentax-unveils-shiny-lx-gold-slr-to-celebrate-60-years/
Kevin
--
--
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a
Almost lost my turkey leftovers..YUCK!! (the original version id
delicious)
Jack
--- Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I must say I like this... Not sure I would ever use it in public lest
it get stolen by some rapper.
FWIW, I read somewhere that in real life, the GM electrics got somewhat less
than 100 miles on a charge.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT - Prius Fuel Economy
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Nov 24, 2006, at 9:58 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006, Markus Maurer wrote:
So the main reason to use a grip is not the additional battery for you?
Are you asking in general or for the -D?
I use a grip with my MZ-50 (and used to do the same when I had the
-5n) 100% of the time I use it. It handles better and the AA Lithiums
I like this one Bruce. The weather beaten wood against the bright rose
petels really makes it stand out.
Dave
Quoting Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
While on a walk in San Francisco, I came across this empty bench with
rose petals scattered around it and blue ribbons tied on the slats.
Interesting. While I generally use a higher percentage, i also use a
lower pixel count and a higher threshold.
Paul
On Nov 25, 2006, at 11:31 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
With the K100, I'm usually at 3, 100%, but I often oversharpen a
bit for
effect.
-Adam
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Usually,
- Original Message -
From: graywolf
Subject: Re: Windows Computer Questions
Sure you can! You can either go with outrageously priced high speed
printers (don't look in the consumer areas for these), or with several
consumer printers.
We are using a photographic printer, not an
Only in Plato's metaphysical universe.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/16/2006 12:55:19 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If
Budweiser were the only beer in the world it would be the best beer in the
world.
==
Not true.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
--
Marnie, Are you trying to cause trouble?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/24/2006 11:29:31 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
IS, VR, Shake reduction, etc. They are all the
same concept ( done in either lenses or bodies )
with different trade names
jco
Sure you can! You can either go with outrageously priced high speed
printers (don't look in the consumer areas for these), or with several
consumer printers.
--graywolf
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter
Subject: OT: Windows Computer Questions
1 - 100 of 260 matches
Mail list logo
