just my little joke, Tim. I promise not to have you killed.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tim Øsleby
Sent: 18 December 2006 01:44
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: PESO - Early Morning
Death penalty for
* make other PS like 750Z IMO (with flash shoe etc)
* make W20 with Antishake.. I'd buy that one immediately.
Any other idea?
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 12/18/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18/12/06, SJ, discombobulated, unleashed:
will keep an eye open for the Chichester book too. is it still in print?
I found a copy in a used book shop for a couple of quid.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_Francis_Chichester
thanks cotty, that
On Dec 17, 2006, at 11:26 PM, Cotty wrote:
My library is heavily SF, and I buy 30-40 volumes a year these days
(used to buy a lot more, but I now own most of the older SF I want).
Ahar. I was (am) heavy Larry Niven. I'm still waiting for a
Ringworld film :-/
yessuh! Larry Niven, David
I think you mean bridle. Let's not bring wives into this.
But to answer your question, she taps it out on the carpet with her
velveteen hooves.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of P. J. Alling
Sent: 17 December 2006 23:38
Hey, don't lump me in with this mob. I was asleep when the
you-know-what, hit the you-know-where. :-)
Yesterday, I processed this shot (I like the colours):
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/IMGP5734.jpg
and printed this one.
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
How am I wrong in my opinion?
Ah!
that's a trick question, isn't it?
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20061217164535
^^^ I went to dupicate old session from 2005, but nature never repeats
itself. Wind has had blown all 2005 reflections away but I like that I
can curve up to 180 degrees into one picture. This right ahead isn't an
island although fisheye curvature
On 12/18/06, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You just seem to be incapable of accepting anyone else's position in a
case of nothing but citing preferences. However given a few of your
earlier comments I can well appreciate why you need all the TV screen
reality that you can get.
:-) Glad to see it. Both good photos.
I was just looking at the negatives out of the Pentax 645. Stunningly
nice lens on that camera (the A35). Tomorrow and beyond for the long,
slow scanning project.
G
On Dec 18, 2006, at 12:43 AM, David Savage wrote:
Hey, don't lump me in with this
On 12/18/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18/12/06, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
...know one mention the Ashes.
Do us a favour mate, keep the Poms there for a bit and train em up.
:-)
Maybe we should rent out the B team
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subash,
If you enjoyed that, try (if you haven't already) Chichester's Along the
Clipper Way. It's derived from the research he undertook (ie: books he
read) while preparing for his circumnavigation.
And, of course, the all time classic of circumnavigation books is the
original - Joshua
Television is a real friend, to people with no real friends.
John
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 02:28:58 -, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally, 5 hours a day in front of the boob tube is way too much. I
think the 2-3 hours average I spend in front of the box is too much.
I'd be
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 03:05:21 -, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When?
When everybody who wants a K10D has got one ion their hands? ;-)
Not in Merrie England, they haven't.
Every week, it is promised for next week. I think it is Pentax's way of
punishing the country that produced
I'd recommend:
- FA 50mm f1.4 (Not a telephoto but a great lens to have IMHO)
- FA 77mm Ltd. f1.8 (It'd eat up most of your budget, but it's sweet)
I can't recommend much more because all the stuff I can think of is very spendy.
Cheers,
Dave
On 12/18/06, J and K Messervy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Dec 18, 2006, at 3:12 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
That quality
and that quantity of Pleasure is a GOOD thing and its certainly
been worth the very reasonable cost to get it for me.
Your definition of pleasure differs slightly from mine. I think I
watch about three hours of TV a week and
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 02:50:31 -, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I totally agree.
But there is always somebody responding, keeping the flames alive. Some
times that somebody is me, some times it is you, and so on.
Therein lies the problem. Discipline is required.
John
Tim
Mostly
Congrats!
Very good price/performance.
G
graywolf wrote:
Graywolf got a new pet, a television. There it was sitting in the thrift
store looking all sad and abandoned, so he paid $15 + tax to spring it.
It sulked at first shutting itself off after less than an hour, and
graywolf thought
Godfrey, if you can try and catch up with a series called 'Coast' and
'Planet Earth' on BBC World at some point. Coast follows the British
mainland coast and is simply unmissable. Planet Earth is Attenborough's
latest outing and contains some unique footage and all of it is jaw-
dropping.
On 18/12/06, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every week, it is promised for next week. I think it is Pentax's way of
punishing the country that produced Phil (this JPEG is soft) Askey.
Yes, highly recommended (just).. LOL
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
thanks, john, for the suggestions and the link. time to go
bookshopping :) i am sure it'd be a much cheaper affair after the
splurge on K and A lenses.
the problem (fun part?) is i'll have to trawl the second-hand book
shops. most of the 'mainstream' book shops have become 'lifestyle'
shops and
Hi Tim
It is a very good solution to just let it be.
It needs at least two for games like this.
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Tim Osleby
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 3:48 AM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE:
Hi Graywolf
do you need a DSLR now for a PESO/PUG entry or for commenting on them?
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
graywolf
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 4:33 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Time for a break
Not in Merrie England, they haven't.
Every week, it is promised for next week. I think it is Pentax's
way of punishing the country that produced Phil (this JPEG is soft)
Askey.
Promised for the 11th December, still waiting, although I believe there are
some in the country, but it could
Take a look at the sky in this pic. (it's a processed PIF, so you can open
it in photoshop if you want to see the exif info)
http://www.neovenator.com/special/__IGP0101.jpg
I was doing some city shots of San Francisco from Treasure Island last night
with my K10D. Lens was M* 300mm f4. ISO
Hi James
could you post a photo or two of the Vivitar at 400mm?
I would be interested to see how good it is compared to my Tamron SP 500
mirror lens.
What is a nasty lens, bad looking?
thanks
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of J
and K
On 18/12/06, John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Take a look at the sky in this pic. (it's a processed PIF, so you can open
it in photoshop if you want to see the exif info)
http://www.neovenator.com/special/__IGP0101.jpg
I was doing some city shots of San Francisco from Treasure Island
Is one of the few Pentax PS recommended by my loved/hated French magazine that
is not particularly fond at Pentax so...it must be a really good camera for its
purpose.
- Mensaje original
De: Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Enviado:
Hi Godfrey
there is seldom a day without taking some photographs or scanning old ones
or teching myself some photo related stuff on the computer or by reading
books for me. And most of the time I carry at least one camera with me
nowadays.
Yesterday I tried my cream can flash diffuser with some
A lovely place to be Roman.
Wide lenses are fun.
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Roman
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 9:41 AM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Unreflected in 2006
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20061217164535
^^^
Hi Paul
does Grace still like to be photographed? Does she start to pose when you
photograph her or does she ignore you and making natural photographs is
easy? And, is she interested in the results and how a camera works?
Aren't there times when she dislikes it?
just wondering
Markus
Very nice photos Dave.
The cat seems to like you ;-)
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
David Savage
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 9:44 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: mighty chilly in hell today
Hey, don't lump
I understand what Godfrey is saying, but I think I'd rather not take a
chance on more Transcend cards.
Paul
On Dec 18, 2006, at 12:41 AM, Lawrence Kwan wrote:
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Jeez, guys. There are defectives from any manufacturer.
One bad card doesn't mean
I watch Planet Earth. It's broadcast in HD on the Discovery Channel.
Beautiful. I frequently turn the sound off and accompany it with music
from a CD.
Paul
On Dec 18, 2006, at 2:38 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 17/12/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
I have the noise box on most
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 22:35:24 -0500, Walter Hamler wrote:
BTW, have you, or any others with the K10, changed the defaults on the front
and rear dials?
I changed mine to +/- control on the front dial and the shift mode on the
rear one.
I have the same, but reversed (+/-) on rear dial, seems to
Hi Godders,
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 22:58:44 -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I've set the K10D set up, in each mode, to have EV Comp on the front
wheel and the primary control (Pshift in Program, ISO in Sv, Shutter
in Tv, Aperture in Av) on the rear wheel. This makes it the most like
the DS
Tom. Your story about your new telly amused me. Congratulations BTW. Telly
makes the world go round ;-)
So you do contribute to the list. I hang her to learn about photography, but
I also hang here for the joy of the ride. And this joy is in telly buying
stories like yours, pictures of Shel's old
G'day Markus,
Thanks.
It was quite a warm day she was laying down resting, and couldn't be
bothered running away like she normally does when I get that close.
:-)
It's taken close to 5 years, for her to warm to me :-)
Cheers,
Dave
On 12/18/06, Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very
On 12/18/06, SJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and india, to quote cricinfo, are 'sniffing victory' in South
Africa. updates later in the day. :) would be nice to see them win for a
change...
And they did.
Congratulations.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hi there.
Tom. Your story about your new telly amused me. Congratulations BTW. Telly
makes the world go round ;-)
So you do contribute to the list. I hang her to learn about photography, but
I also hang here for the joy of the ride. And this joy is in telly buying
stories like yours,
Maybe as with the D one has to deactivate noise reduction for long exposures ?
2006/12/18, John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Take a look at the sky in this pic. (it's a processed PIF, so you can open
it in photoshop if you want to see the exif info)
Ok it looks like most of us with K10Ds have at some point or another
experienced some issues with banding.. Barring a fix from pentax may i
suggest that we all share our expereinces so that the issue is better
understood and we also find the best ways to avoid the issue.
I have hit the issue when
I've only come across it on underexposed shots that I've had to push
1.5-2+ stops in ACR to get a usable image.
I've not yet shot any long exposures.
Cheers,
Dave
On 12/18/06, Patrick Genovese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok it looks like most of us with K10Ds have at some point or another
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 21:01:38 +0900
David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/18/06, SJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and india, to quote cricinfo, are 'sniffing victory' in South
Africa. updates later in the day. :) would be nice to see them win
for a change...
And they did.
Markus,
You might be interested to know I tried some bubble wrap as a flash
diffuser. I saw them doing it on the site you pointed to. I used the
'small bubble' wrap, and still have some problems to work out, but it
sure is convenient. It's a big square of bubble wrap and a rubber
band that
On my *istD if I have to severely push an image in ACR (2+ stops)
banding appears. I just don't bother with that.
On 12/18/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've only come across it on underexposed shots that I've had to push
1.5-2+ stops in ACR to get a usable image.
I've not yet
The only time I've been able to see it was when I shot the inside of the lens
cap with an eight second exposure at ISO 1600. I did some outdoor night
photography with no problems, but I used a tripod and shot at ISO 100. I expect
the next firmware update will provide some improvement, but it
I am a being repeatedly harrased by Paul Stenquist
in private emails. He will not stop
emailing me with harrassing letters.
He has been asked repeatedly to stop
with no harrassment in return and he
wont. He got my private email address
from this list and to be using it to
harrass me in my private
No, HDTV/Home theater is embarrsing to people with no taste or culture
whatsoever.Home theater isnt about friendship, its
about entertainment. None of my friends are professional
entertainers. The whole mentality that there is
something wrong with using home theater or that its somehow
a
One enablement at a time Boris.
And you would have to set some money aside for film with a 645.
Regards, Bob S.
On 12/17/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Thanks Boris! I'm liking this camera too much. It's going to mean
money for me... :-\
It just occurred to me that good
That's my point.
Dave
On 12/18/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On my *istD if I have to severely push an image in ACR (2+ stops)
banding appears. I just don't bother with that.
On 12/18/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've only come across it on underexposed shots
John,
Interesting situation. I will try to repeat your experiment this afternoon.
Did you use the built-in NR?
When you say processed PIF, do you mean you shot raw (as PEF), and
developed it with Photo LAB?
Did you do any further post-processing, eg. contrast enhancement?
Jostein
On 12/18/06,
Paul's got a point.
You do seem to have a hard time relating to, communicating with people in
a civil manner.
Cheers,
Dave
At 10:14 PM 18/12/2006, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I am a being repeatedly harrased by Paul Stenquist
in private emails. He will not stop
emailing me with harrassing
HAR!
I did send him an e-mail asking him to lay off Tom in regard to the television.
Of course he had to get the last word in. I decided to see if I could outlast
him. The man needs help.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am a
Have you upgraded to HD? I agree that
the old ntsc is no where near as pleasurable
as HD. I was just like you too until I upgraded.
I lost interest in film broadcasts in the
late 80's when laserdiscs went to original
aspect ratio and hbo didnt. But now I have
multiple movie channels all showing
Bob, bite your tongue.
Boris, get both. I'm sure you could do great things with both cameras.
Dave
On 12/18/06, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One enablement at a time Boris.
And you would have to set some money aside for film with a 645.
Regards, Bob S.
On 12/17/06, Boris
I'll post some test shots with a description on shooting conditions.
Maybe we can discuss them.
Regards
Patrick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
LOL
And to think a few weeks ago you were asking Bill to stop baiting him.
Though you are correct, he's not quite right needs some sort of help.
Cheers,
Dave
On 12/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HAR!
I did send him an e-mail asking him to lay off Tom in regard to the
And Alabama Jones and the Busty Crusade is the epitome of cultured viewing?
Cheers,
Dave
On 12/18/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, HDTV/Home theater is embarrsing to people with no taste or culture
whatsoever.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 12/18/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=
Paul Stenquists still writes to me in private emails:
repeated plain requests to stop:
For your own good, you should try to get help. Some counseling could go
a long way toward
LOL I'd like to be there to see their faces ;)
2006/12/18, cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'd never tried it before.
I always have film in my camera.
I finished a roll Saturday morning at my daughter's birthday breakfast
party.
I decided to try it.
It worked!
I can now do the mirror lock-up
Have you seen it? Its only one of many many genres
I enjoy and in glorius HD. And belive it or not, it
was shot on location somewhere and the beautiful scenery was
almost as nice to watch and enjoy as the ladies were.
Really fantastic picture quality on that one...
jco
-Original Message-
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:02:35 +0100, Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
* make other PS like 750Z IMO (with flash shoe etc)
* make W20 with Antishake.. I'd buy that one immediately.
Any other idea?
* Optio limited, with a high-end 40mm (eq) lens?
* Basic digicam for left-handers? I know
Dave's another, who lives in a PAL broadcast region.
Dave
On 12/18/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you upgraded to HD? I agree that
the old ntsc is no where near as pleasurable
as HD.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
If they're anything like my family friends their eye's glazed over,
and gave him a crazy photo geek look.
:-)
Dave
On 12/18/06, Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LOL I'd like to be there to see their faces ;)
2006/12/18, cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'd never tried it before.
I always
Nope.
Dave
On 12/18/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you seen it? Its only one of many many genres
I enjoy and in glorius HD. And belive it or not, it
was shot on location somewhere and the beautiful scenery was
almost as nice to watch and enjoy as the ladies were.
Really
I'd never tried it before.
I always have film in my camera.
I finished a roll Saturday morning at my daughter's birthday breakfast
party.
I decided to try it.
It worked!
I can now do the mirror lock-up flick fairly consistently.
I was pretty excited at my success.
Nobody else understood.
I tried
Indeed, Dave, in all other situations my *istD gives perfectly good
pictures, sans of course the capable hands of the photographer who's
holding it ;-).
On 12/18/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's my point.
Dave
On 12/18/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On my *istD
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 01:56:43 +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
b) I could find the dark tent and processing equipment.
Dark tent. Is that what I think it is? Googling revealed mainly
glow-in-the-dark tent pegs (to freak out moles, no doubt) and ancient
photography
You think anyone EVER has the right
to use email addresses from the list
to send private repeated harrassing emails
when they have been told repeatedly
and NON HARASSINGLY to stop? NO, that
is never right under any circumstances.
I totally disagree. If he has a problem
with something I post on the
Well, no, I am not getting MF gear. It is just too big for my habits.
I am still not sure I will be getting K10D... Honestly, if you ask me,
I'd much rather go digital Leica road. Even that quirky Epson camera
that requires some mechanical action to go to the next shot attracts
me.
On 12/18/06,
Scott Loveless wrote:
Whomever laid out the trail at the
CO canal decided that it meant painting blue blazes on the tops of
very pointy rocks.
Ahhh, yes, the Billy Goat Trail as we affectionately refer to it :-)
Sounds like you guys had a great time... Sorry I missed it!
--
Christian
On 12/18/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am a being repeatedly harrased by Paul Stenquist
in private emails. He will not stop
emailing me with harrassing letters
J.C. you're clearly over-reacting.
--
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I'm not surprised you haven't had many private messages form PDML members.
The shock of it happening must be quite distressing.
Dave
On 12/18/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You think anyone EVER has the right
to use email addresses from the list
to send private repeated
On 18/12/06, Jaume Lahuerta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is one of the few Pentax PS recommended by my loved/hated French magazine
that is not particularly fond at Pentax so...it must be a really good camera
for its purpose.
Thanks guys, it's looking like it has potential then. The following
On 19/12/06, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dark tent. Is that what I think it is? Googling revealed mainly
glow-in-the-dark tent pegs (to freak out moles, no doubt) and ancient
photography equipment...
Like a film change bag only larger generally.
Netiquette? Are you kidding me?
Not when its like this, I dont want
his harrassing emails obviously and
to be using my email address from the
list information to harrass me is wrong
and the worst netiquette imaginable.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
ditto for pal, it might be
shade better than ntsc on resolution
but its worse on motion due to the
lower frame rate. Not even in the
same league as 720P or 1080i.
I guess I should use he term analog
video instead.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
I hear that.
My cameras are rarley at faul. It's usually the guy standing behind it.
:-)
Dave
On 12/18/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed, Dave, in all other situations my *istD gives perfectly good
pictures, sans of course the capable hands of the photographer who's
holding
On 19/12/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who runs this list?
So how long have you been posting here?
No don't answer, just check the link at the bottom of each and every post.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Good, now I can reply. He sent me a whole
bunch of personally attacking insulting
PRIVATE EMAILS I did not want. He continued
doing it even after I politely sent him
simple replies that asked him to stop
emailing me TWICE. That is not trying to get the last
word in , that is trying to get rid
of a
How would like a bunch of insulting private
emails coming into your private email box
and the person doesnt stop doing it even
when politely asked to stop emailing me TWICE? Its
incredible behavior and abuse of list information.
(using my email address obtained from list posts for
private
818 messages in the inbox. Gotta be a new record. of course 400+ were
flame-related. :-)
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:16:14 +0100, Digital Image Studio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/12/06, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dark tent. Is that what I think it is? Googling revealed mainly
glow-in-the-dark tent pegs (to freak out moles, no doubt) and ancient
photography
On 12/18/06, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 01:56:43 +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
b) I could find the dark tent and processing equipment.
Dark tent. Is that what I think it is? Googling revealed mainly
glow-in-the-dark tent pegs (to
I only wish you could keep ALL of this private.
DagT
Fra: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: RE: Paul Stequest Will not stop sending me harrasing private emails
You think anyone EVER has the right
to use email addresses from the list
to send private repeated harrassing emails
when
Yes it is because its quite WRONG to
be using someones private email box
to repeately harrass them under ANY CIRCUMSTANCES.
And especailly when they were asked
repeatedly and politely to STOP.
If he cant respond to my list posts
in public on the list, he has no business harassing
me in private
I'd like to ask you JCO, with as much politeness as I can muster, to
keep your private conversations private. Please.
Pretty please.
Jostein
On 12/18/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How would like a bunch of insulting private
emails coming into your private email box
and the
Welcome back to PDMHEL
Jump in, the sulphur is lovely.
Cheers,
Dave
On 12/18/06, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
818 messages in the inbox. Gotta be a new record. of course 400+ were
flame-related. :-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
He took it off list to spare everyone else, and what did you do? Drag
this crap out in public.
Thanks John.
Dave
On 12/18/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes it is because its quite WRONG to
be using someones private email box
to repeately harrass them under ANY CIRCUMSTANCES.
Go on Boris.
Deep down you know you want one. Imagine what one of those lovely
landscape shots of yours would look like on a nice, big transparency.
evil enabling grin
Dave :-)
On 12/18/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, no, I am not getting MF gear. It is just too big for my
I'm only going to respond to this thread one more time. Then I'm dropping the
matter completely. You do as you wish.
I wrote to you off-list because I wanted to get you to stop harrassing my
friend Tom without embarassing you and without making my concerns public. You
immediately replied in an
About as much as I like insulting rude public emails from a person
who's been asked, more than twice, but still refuses to stop.
Cheers,
Dave
On 12/18/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How would like a bunch of insulting private
emails coming into your private email box
and the
http://roman.blakout.net/r-rated/800x533-IMGP8495_HDR.jpg
Autoportrait
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Dec 18, 2006, at 9:28 AM, DagT wrote:
I only wish you could keep ALL of this private.
If someone is sending harassing mails, just set your e-mail software
to automatically put their messages in your trash or junk boxes.
Problem solved.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
In fact I have been getting your insults to other people into my private
mailbox for weeks, and I'm getting tired of it.
DagT
Fra: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How would like a bunch of insulting private
emails coming into your private email box
and the person doesnt stop doing it
Likewise.
On 12/18/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hear that.
My cameras are rarley at faul. It's usually the guy standing behind it.
:-)
Dave
On 12/18/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed, Dave, in all other situations my *istD gives perfectly good
Two points:
1 You have been told far more than TWICE, in the few of your flame wars
that I have actually read parts of, to stop posting here - did that stop
you?
2 Did you ever try simply not replying to any of his personal emails?
Would have been worth a shot if what you REALLY wanted was for
Dave,
Go on Boris.
Deep down you know you want one. Imagine what one of those lovely
landscape shots of yours would look like on a nice, big transparency.
evil enabling grin
I've some good Fuji NPC 160 (I think) that I shot with 645NII back in
2004 (Yet another thanks goes wholeheartedly
Believe, I TRIED, and it wasnt working.
I had no choice but to report it to the
list masters.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
DagT
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 9:29 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: Paul Stequest Will not
1 - 100 of 338 matches
Mail list logo
