I'm not quite sure whether you're insulting the Poms or the Kiwis.
Baa...
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
Quoting Trevor Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
G'day.
The only way the Poms can beat the Kiwis is to throw an Ugg boot
into the
You mean there is a difference?
Cum arty cum arty.
Hooroo.
Regards, Trevor.
Grafton.
OZ
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Brian Walters
Sent: Saturday, 6 January 2007 6:59 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: OT - The Ashes
I'm
On 06/01/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 5, 2007, at 10:33 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
You (Mac) guys are a hoot, my server RAID partitions are System, Data,
Audio, Images. ;-)
My drives are all named for places in Ursula Le Guin's novels:
Werel, Hosk, Orkney,
On 5/1/07, Brian Walters, discombobulated, unleashed:
Gloating just isn't something that we Australians do... We are gracious
in winning
That the sound of hell freezing over? ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Don't do that too often but...
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, John Francis wrote:
After all, the FA* 80-200/f2.8 didn't cost that much.
Mark!
Kostas (buying three built-in electrical appliances and getting change
instead)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Epson 3200 scan:
Which Epson 3200 is this? The Perfection 3200 flatbed or the hapless
F-3200 4x5 film scanner?
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
manual cameras and photo
Epson Perfection 3200 flatbed
Cheers,
Dave
On 1/6/07, Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Epson 3200 scan:
Which Epson 3200 is this? The Perfection 3200 flatbed or the hapless
F-3200 4x5 film scanner?
Ralf
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16108
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Epson Perfection 3200 flatbed
I see. Had one of those for a few years and it took the introduction of
the V700 to make me part with it. In the menatime I had tried the 4870,
4990, and the Canon 9900 (?) and the improvement was just too marginal.
To make
On Jan 6, 2007, at 12:03 AM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Beaker
Subject: Re: OT: Cat's cameras
I'm scared now-
Got a sweet little orange kitten for Christmas called Tigger.
Except when he transforms into the Orange Peril - an insane little
chewing
I would like it more if the man on the right corner was cut away and again
the photo looks a bit blurred to me.
But the trees are nice indeed Boris :-)
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Boris Liberman
Sent: Saturday, January
Great moody composition and the two palm trees add a nice focal point. I agree
with Marcus that it would be better if cropped a bit on the right to remove the
'half man'.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
Quoting Boris Liberman [EMAIL
Hi,
I have for sale or trade:
AF140C in excellent condition, with case and adapter rings - Price ?,
not really sure how much these are worth, open to negotiation.
FA 50mm F1.4, In pretty much as new condition - $190us (price based
on ebay prices)
A 35mm F2.0, In good condition - $180us
A
I have a V700 and its quite good with xpan negs and 6x6, better than
the 4870 we have at work.
If Paul wants to send me a neg and i can scan it.
Regards,
Paul
On 06/01/2007, at 5:36 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 06/01/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a pic I
Well, we might as well gloat now because things are bound to change eventually.
Actually, with so many of the current Australian team retiring, there's a spot
for a good all-rounder. Wonder if Freddy might consider emigration?.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian
I think it's a nice shot of a harbor at dawn, but the title threw me.
The palm trees seem incidental.
Paul
On Jan 6, 2007, at 1:05 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16107full=1
As usual brutal and honest comments are the best ;-).
Boris
--
PDML
It's the Perfection 3200 flatbed, which has served me very well. But
perhaps not as well as I once thought :-).
Paul
On Jan 6, 2007, at 5:11 AM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Epson 3200 scan:
Which Epson 3200 is this? The Perfection 3200 flatbed or
Thanks Ralf. I'll try that.
Paul
On Jan 6, 2007, at 5:57 AM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Epson Perfection 3200 flatbed
I see. Had one of those for a few years and it took the introduction of
the V700 to make me part with it. In the menatime I had tried
Yes, I'd like to see how the new Epson performs on this as well. I
notice the Imacon was able to separate the green of the trees from the
blue fog while the Epson 3200 was not. Perhaps I can find someone
locally who owns the V700 or maybe a store will let me do a test scan.
Paul
On Jan 6, 2007,
Good one. I would crop it a little tighter at the top and clone out the
black blobs.
Paul
On Jan 6, 2007, at 5:35 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16108
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I like this.
But as Paul said, the ducks (or whatever it is) distracts.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Boris Liberman
Sent: 6. januar 2007 11:35
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO -
-- Original message --
From: Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have for sale or trade:
AF140C in excellent condition, with case and adapter rings - Price ?,
not really sure how much these are worth, open to negotiation.
Paul,
to give you a baseline, KEH has
-- Original message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Reese)
-- Original message --
From: Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have for sale or trade:
AF140C in excellent condition, with case and adapter rings - Price ?,
For me, the two palms are misplaced in the composition. If they where a bit
more to the right, it would have worked a lot better.
I like the light, and the lazy waves in lower right corner, adds some life
to the scene.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
Lighting, especially with reflections, is very nice.
I'd have to crop out the lower right boat transom and suck up the
scene. Then moving slightly to the left and shooting back a little to
the right to get more of a look at the transom line of the string of
boats on the right. Maybe I'd hate the
Hello...
Just wanted to introduce myself (again). I was once a subscriber to PDML
back a few years when I was shooting film with my Pentax PZ20. Then I made
the switch to digital (a Sony S85). I spent about 3 years or so with that.
It is a good camera, but I wanted my SLR back. I enjoyed the
It must have been nice to have the father teaching you darkroom technoques,
Bob :-) I didn't start until I got my first SLR in 1973.
The Viscount (french for count or similar) is quite nice - a bit newer
(1959-60) than the 35-series (1954) - according to Massimo Bertacchi.
I am looking for a 35-V
Welcome back, Ed. You're off to a good start with your gallery. Keep
working at it. The dog pic is my favorite.
Paul
On Jan 6, 2007, at 9:38 AM, Ed Keeney wrote:
Hello...
Just wanted to introduce myself (again). I was once a subscriber to
PDML
back a few years when I was shooting film
Hi all:
I would like to know if someone has tried to use the DA 70 mm. 2.4 on a
film SLR, and in that case, whether it covers the 35 mm. film frame or
not, and if there is severe vignetting.
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Great book - just recently finished reading it for the second time.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Paul Stenquist
Nice composition. Very dramatic. Excellent work. Lost Horizons to
us westereners.
http://picasaweb.google.com/nsjeyan/Road/photo#5016756202158631506
--
PDML
--- David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It must be the PDML equivalent of a slow-news day
when we resort to
discussing the names of our hard drives.
- Dave
I was thinking the same thing.
-Brendan
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 06/01/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for naming one of the drives after me:-).
Paul
My drives are bandit, jack, minnie and willie -- my dogs and kids,
living and dead.
Paul
On Jan 5, 2007, at 11:10 PM, Brendan MacRae wrote:
When I got
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/05 Fri PM 10:52:03 GMT
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Subject: OT - The Ashes
I'm surprised at the lack of gloating here...and apprehensive at its
arrival. So in a fit if pre-emptive strike rage, I'll start.
What a shambles. I'm gutted.
Nicely ironic title.
Boris Liberman wrote:
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16107full=1
As usual brutal and honest comments are the best ;-).
Boris
--
--
The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
-- Anne Louise Germaine de Stael
--
PDML
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=21555257
Rumours only of course ... but cool nonetheless...
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
The modern world intrudes again.
SJ wrote:
thanks paul. really appreciate that comment.
regarding 'lost horizons', there is access to the Net available
through a mobile phone right from that spot. :))
regards, subash
On 1/6/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice
On the only machine currently running the Primary Drive is drive two,
and the Secondary drive is drive one...
Altogether about 400 gig of storage.
David Mann wrote:
On Jan 6, 2007, at 7:33 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
You (Mac) guys are a hoot, my server RAID partitions are System,
Nice shots, Doug - great textures and lighting.
- MCC
Doug Brewer wrote:
Hi Kids,
Been goofing around with the K10D and thought I'd show a few examples.
Nothing earth-shattering, just more evidence that I like captive subjects.
Anyway:
http://photos.drivingtheflies.com/
Enjoy, and
Quite a noticeable difference - beautiful morning light behind the
vehicles BTW.
I use an Epson 3200 for my medium format scans. I'm not surprised at the
difference - I found it to be iffy for high quality scans from slide
film, but then slide film is the most demanding for scanning.
I think
That's very good.
Boris Liberman wrote:
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16108
Boris
--
--
The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
-- Anne Louise Germaine de Stael
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Mark Roberts wrote:
I agree. I found P-TTL to be vastly superior to TTL on digital.
I'd tweak your sentence as follows:
I found P-TTL to be vastly superior to TTL on the *istD.
With the *istDS, the plain old TTL works very well, enough you can hardly
find any difference.
Dario
--
PDML
I think he got both.
(I can only thank God that the US doesn't play Cricket).
Brian Walters wrote:
I'm not quite sure whether you're insulting the Poms or the Kiwis.
Baa...
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
Quoting Trevor Bailey
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/06 Sat AM 07:40:42 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: How big is big enough?
On Jan 5, 2007, at 10:33 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
You (Mac) guys are a hoot, my server RAID partitions are System,
I have 600GB (51% full), RAID 0 with 0 partitions, that I lovingly call C
:-)
Dave
On 1/7/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the only machine currently running the Primary Drive is drive two,
and the Secondary drive is drive one...
Altogether about 400 gig of storage.
David
These things don't eat fish. They are filter feeders and and subsist on
very small animal life such as rotifers, small nematodes (1 mm long)
water fleas and suchlike.
D
P. J. Alling wrote:
That's very good.
Boris Liberman wrote:
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16108
Boris
From: Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/06 Sat PM 04:48:28 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Gimme my fish
These things don't eat fish. They are filter feeders and and subsist on
very small animal life such as rotifers, small nematodes (1 mm
This is art (!), and as such creative licence is allowed :-)
Also Gimme my Nematodes doesn't roll off the tongue as nicely.
Boris, if it were mine I'd clone out the duck (?) and the reflections
in the background. I find they distract from the main subjects.
Cheers,
Dave
On 1/7/07, Don
Who cares about the title in this case...
mike wilson wrote:
From: Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/06 Sat PM 04:48:28 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Gimme my fish
These things don't eat fish. They are filter feeders and and subsist on
very
All prices in Canadian, plus shipping. I can only take money orders at
the moment.
Kit #1.
K100D with less than 2000 shots on the clock. This is probably the best
6MP body on the market today, with in-body stabilization, the best
viewfinder short of the D80 or K10D, excellent image quality,
Welcome Ed.
About raw word flow. I wrote an article describing my work flow
http://www.photosight.org/pforum/showflat.php?Cat=Board=phototechnicalityN
umber=322113page=0view=collapsedsb=5o=fpart=.
So why not short version it to English?
If you don't find it useful, somebody else might.
I'm not
Adam, where are you located ?
2007/1/6, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
All prices in Canadian, plus shipping. I can only take money orders at
the moment.
Kit #1.
K100D with less than 2000 shots on the clock. This is probably the best
6MP body on the market today, with in-body stabilization,
On 1/6/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have 600GB (51% full), RAID 0 with 0 partitions, that I lovingly call C
:-)
Ah, the wonders of raid 0. My first and only SCSI system included a
matched pair of Seagate drives. It booted Redhat 7pointsomething.
One fine day a drive wouldn't
Toronto, Canada
Postal code is M6C 3L9
-Adam
Thibouille wrote:
Adam, where are you located ?
2007/1/6, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
All prices in Canadian, plus shipping. I can only take money orders at
the moment.
Kit #1.
K100D with less than 2000 shots on the clock. This is
I agree with Tom's view of this image.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PESO - City Night
I like water reflections shots... I would like this too, except what's the
two blackish blobs around the center of the frame? They seem
On Jan 5, 2007, at 7:48 PM, George Sinos wrote:
In the last four years I've managed to fill 300 Mbyte drive. A
terabyte is a bit over three times that big.
I talked to one of the pros in town and he said he's adding about a
terabyte a month to his disk farm.
At the moment I have five 300
So why not short version it to English?
This is what happens when speed editing ;-) Simply forget that sentence, it
is unimportant.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim
Øsleby
Sent: 6. januar
On Jan 5, 2007, at 10:50 PM, David Savage wrote:
But then you get people who'll break off a face to face conversation,
to answer the phone. That really pi55es me off.
I won't put up with a salesclerk who does that. I politely tell him/
her to put the caller on hold until we finish. If
I'm somewhat amazed at the difference in the background trees yet the
subject cars don't appear different to me.
I'd really like to see the Imacon compared to the large format Nikon scanner
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Imacon vs.
Since you've titled this Two Palm trees, I'd have to say that the lines of
boats are a distraction.
It would be a stronger image with less foreground less showing of boats on
the RH side.
YMMV.
Trying not to be brutal but honest.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Boris
Nice capture Boris. If it were mine, I'd get rid of the black edge along the
top the black bird above the LH Flamingo.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - Gimme my fish
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16108
Boris
--
On 1/06/07 1:31 PM, Bob Shell, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think cell
phone use in theaters, restaurants, and many other places should
simply be banned since people are too damned stupid to know when it
isn't appropriate.
They are not only rude and unsophisticated, but have nerve to do so.
Welcome.
BTW, Don't believe anything Paul Stenquist, William Robb, Mark Roberts,
Frank Theriault, or Jostein say. :-)
Tom C.
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Introduction
Date:
Yes, the cars are very similar, although there's some better detail
in the grille and badges on the Imacon scan. The real different seems
to be in color gradation. The Imacon distinguished the green of the
trees from the blue of the fog much more accurately than the Epson.
Paul
On Jan 6,
I realize after looking at it, that the blobs are two people. However, they
don't strike me as that at first, just two oof blobs. I think the shot
would be better without them, but if people are there, in focus silohouettes
woud be best.
Tom C.
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 6, 2007, at 1:56 PM, K.Takeshita wrote:
I think cell
phone use in theaters, restaurants, and many other places should
simply be banned since people are too damned stupid to know when it
isn't appropriate.
They are not only rude and unsophisticated, but have nerve to do
so. Just
mike wilson wrote:
Just keep your beak out of others' business.
[That's a suggestion for an alternative title..8-)]
This one just occurred to me:
Mind your own beak-sness ;-)
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Paul
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Good one. I would crop it a little tighter at the top and clone out the
black blobs.
Paul
I should say that I cropped out some more ducks from the top and
deliberately left at least one of them in order to give some kind of
perspective in the shot. I am
mike wilson wrote:
Just keep your beak out of others' business.
[That's a suggestion for an alternative title..8-)]
Thanks. That's rather cool suggestion.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Ed,
Welcome back.
I started digital with a Sony S75-85 in tandem with film. About 18
months ago, I went for a *ist Ds and NO MORE Shutter Lag. I'm sure
you'll be happy with it.
I took Picasa up on their offer and haven't looked back. The
uploading is so much easier than AOL. I post the less
Hi!
Markus Maurer wrote:
I would like it more if the man on the right corner was cut away and again
the photo looks a bit blurred to me.
But the trees are nice indeed Boris :-)
greetings
Markus
Markus, I did not notice the man until I read your message ;-). As for
the blur, indeed, this
Hi!
Tim Øsleby wrote:
For me, the two palms are misplaced in the composition. If they where a bit
more to the right, it would have worked a lot better.
I like the light, and the lazy waves in lower right corner, adds some life
to the scene.
Tim, I rather dislike it when composition is 100%
Bob Shell wrote:
Agreed. I saw on TV that they have the technology now to disable
cell phones inside of buildings, and that it was being used in some
French movie theaters. Now that's technology that makes sense.
The only good side of this is that people who have mental disorders
Jack Davis wrote:
Lighting, especially with reflections, is very nice.
I'd have to crop out the lower right boat transom and suck up the
scene. Then moving slightly to the left and shooting back a little to
the right to get more of a look at the transom line of the string of
boats on the
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Since you've titled this Two Palm trees, I'd have to say that the lines of
boats are a distraction.
It would be a stronger image with less foreground less showing of boats on
the RH side.
YMMV.
Trying not to be brutal but honest.
Thanks! That's what I am always
On Jan 6, 2007, at 2:21 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
I
think that on wider FLs the SR can indeed add some blurring instead of
actually making it sharper.
I have found exactly the opposite to be the case. SR improves
sharpness for any handheld shot of moderate shutter speed. (less than
I take this as a declaration of war ;-)
Boris, you are in your right to disagree.
In fact I expected you to, because if you didn't, you would probably not
have posted the image.
BTW. I think Kenneth said the same as I did, but said it better.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
And keep in mind that Tom suffers from frequent bouts of PMS:-)).
Paul
On Jan 6, 2007, at 2:18 PM, Tom C wrote:
Welcome.
BTW, Don't believe anything Paul Stenquist, William Robb, Mark Roberts,
Frank Theriault, or Jostein say. :-)
Tom C.
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
On Jan 6, 2007, at 2:18 PM, Tom C wrote:
Welcome.
BTW, Don't believe anything Paul Stenquist, William Robb, Mark Roberts,
Frank Theriault, or Jostein say. :-)
Seems like one usual suspect is missing. Can't remember who :-).
Ken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I disagree. When I first looked at the picture my eye was drawn
straight to the palm trees. I think it's a very well composed
photograph, and a good example of how a small element, well placed,
can dominate the picture. The control over the exposure is very good
too - I think Boris has taken full
Pentax Mental Syndrom?
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Stenquist
Sent: 6. januar 2007 20:45
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Introduction
And keep in mind that Tom suffers from
This photo is from the same shoot as the other slightly blurred one, isn't
it? BTW I'm not bothered by this, I'm just curious. Perhaps this tells us
something? Why this moment of light theraultianism?
Could your SR be malfunctioning in some situations? If so, why?
(A lot of questions, no
Quoting Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If you are Ken Rockwell, you like strong colours.
I'm not, thank God
Dave
Equine Photography in York Region
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
They had K10 review in that issue and stated this: CCD sensitivity is
100 - 1600, but we have information that future firmware update will
change that range to 50 - 3200 !
Forgive my ignorance, but how is it that a firmware upgrade can allow
that, is there no hardware involved
Feroze
I have replaced Cotty in the unreliable list:-).
Paul
On Jan 6, 2007, at 3:10 PM, K.Takeshita wrote:
On Jan 6, 2007, at 2:18 PM, Tom C wrote:
Welcome.
BTW, Don't believe anything Paul Stenquist, William Robb, Mark
Roberts,
Frank Theriault, or Jostein say. :-)
Seems like one usual
Nothing unusual about removing distracting elements. The ducks at top
come across as black blobs. They don't contribute, they distract.
Therefore, I would remove them.
Paul
On Jan 6, 2007, at 2:26 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Paul
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Good one. I would crop it a little
I don't think there is hardware involved ither the hardware already in
the camera.
The manufacturer probably just choose or not to provide that option.
They deactivated this possibility in final 1.0 fimware and *might*
enable it later.
2007/1/6, Feroze [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
They had K10 review in
The CCD has one sensitivity level. In the case of the K10D, that base
ISO is 100. Any change from 100 is done in firmware/software through
signal and image enhancement (?) or degradation (?). Within a narrow
range, the process works well. Not too different from pushing film
during the
Canada.. Mmm do you have any idea about shipping costs to Belgium?
2007/1/6, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Toronto, Canada
Postal code is M6C 3L9
-Adam
Thibouille wrote:
Adam, where are you located ?
2007/1/6, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
All prices in Canadian, plus shipping. I
Oh, like limiting a car to 250km/h?
Feroze
Thibouille wrote:
I don't think there is hardware involved ither the hardware already in
the camera.
The manufacturer probably just choose or not to provide that option.
They deactivated this possibility in final 1.0 fimware and *might*
enable it
not for me, but your pano is really neat!
russ
On 1/5/07, John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lots of lookers, but no bids just yet:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=150076053687
If you have any questions, or if you'd like to make an offer, please let me
know.
Thanks,
Something like that indeed.
Say the car can do it but obviously the manufacturer thinks the car
might not be secure enough, it might decide to artifically limit
specifications.
IMO (but really only an opinion) DSLRs manufacturers could enable ISO
25000 if they wanted. Of course it'd be
- Original Message -
From: Thibouille Subject: Re: FS Friday (A day late)
Canada.. Mmm do you have any idea about shipping costs to Belgium?
http://www.postescanada.ca/personal/tools/calcrate-f.asp
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Yes, it is possible if imaging processor allows this. In firmware v
0.2 it was possible to set iso50 and 3200. I believe for some reasons
Pentax has cut these sensitivities in firmware v 1.0
On 06.01.07, at 21:32 , Feroze wrote:
They had K10 review in that issue and stated this: CCD
The sensor has a native sensitiivity. Software pushes the image
much as you would in PhotoShop if you accidentally underexposed.
That's why it gradually deteriorates as the ISO increases.
Paul
On Jan 6, 2007, at 3:32 PM, Feroze wrote:
They had K10 review in that issue and stated this: CCD
Boris, nice mood shot. I like this one better than the flamingos (if
that means anything to you). I like you mentioned, did not notice the
an until others mentioned him, and I agree with Bob that you did a
good job on the exposure, I know that if I were there I would have
underexposed, and then
interesting/comical shot, I am not sure what I was expecting, but it
made me laugh out loud
russ
On 1/6/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16108
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
nice shot Dag. it makes me think of fishing... with your hands. what
is it they are *actually* doing?
russ
On 1/5/07, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=281748
*istD, FA50mm, 1:1.4, 1/15 hand held.
DagT
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
In my secret second ( or maybe third?) life, I'm Ken Rockwell, and
I'm damn well tired of you Pentaxians making fun of me. Nikon rules!
Paul
On Jan 6, 2007, at 3:18 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
Quoting Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If you are Ken Rockwell, you like strong colours.
I'm not,
thanks guys, doesn't sound too magical now though
Feroze
Paul Stenquist wrote:
The sensor has a native sensitiivity. Software pushes the image
much as you would in PhotoShop if you accidentally underexposed.
That's why it gradually deteriorates as the ISO increases.
Paul
On Jan 6,
the second one is better, less distractions. the only thing maybe a
little distracting in this one is the few reflections off the snow...
at least the ones at the top that are in shadow
russ
On 1/5/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am curious as to your thoughts of this one, compared
1 - 100 of 183 matches
Mail list logo
