I prefer the first. It's lighter and the frame round each photo is
less distracting. On the other hand, I don't like the frame around the
page at all - it serves no purpose.
The text on the single pages of style 1 falls below the line, even on
my hi-res screen, and I think the font is
Nice stuff John.
I prefer the darker frames background
Cheers,
Dave
On 2/3/07, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to get my photography a little more organized.
As part of this effort I'm attempting to get out of the house
at least once a week, camera in hand.
This is a
Having decided to do some test shots (to be posted later today), comparing
the image quality of the *ist D and the K10D, I drove to the seaside and put
my beloved (and now unfortunately disscontinued) SMC Pentax FA* 2.8/80-200mm
ED IF zoom lens on a tripod.
After mounting the K10D body on the
On 2/2/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
I didn't see it either. I thought Cotty was joking. It's just in the
out of focus trees. Clone that sucker out!
In fact I can see a second one shooting down through the moon.
And a big fat one far right.
Paul's right, clone em out ;-)
On 3/2/07, Digital Image Studio, discombobulated, unleashed:
Would you like an invite Cotty? ;-)
I must admit, I never expected *you* to be assimilated !
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
M$ will never send an email to get you install a patch.
Trash it now... it stinks troyan/virus whetever crap.
2007/2/3, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As must be true with all Windows users, I too am continually getting
Microsoft emails carrying the subject heading: Use This Patch
Immediately!
On 03/02/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I must admit, I never expected *you* to be assimilated !
I'm apparently very malleable these days :-(
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
It (power zoom lens) is just using the power supply contacts that the
new SSM lenses will make use of.
I don't think we'll see a return of power zoom.
Cheers,
Dave
On 2/3/07, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having decided to do some test shots (to be posted later today), comparing
the
Yes but we shall see what DA17-70 Pentax will offer us... /4-5.6? /4 ?
/3.5-4.5 ? Mmm
2007/2/2, Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That list, but I recall some discussion from Photokina that indicated
the lenses were due in 07 as Pentax was accellerating its lens
introductions to make up for
On 03/02/07, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe the main improvements are the speed issues. No more waiting for
the buffer to clear, as long as I shoot JPG's.
In all everything works faster with the K10D.
What cards are you using with your new camera? Using fast cards like
the
Well it wa known, I'm pretty sure we talked about on the list.
A Pentax rep also officially said it was supported back at Photokina.
IMO Pentax will never go PoweerZoom again. You see the way I
understand the thing is that it is more a random chance that they
designed their SDM mount using those
On 2/3/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/2/07, Digital Image Studio, discombobulated, unleashed:
Would you like an invite Cotty? ;-)
I must admit, I never expected *you* to be assimilated !
We are the Gee. Resistance is futile.
;-)
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I believe the main improvements are the speed issues. No
more waiting for
the buffer to clear, as long as I shoot JPG's.
In all everything works faster with the K10D.
What cards are you using with your new camera? Using fast cards like
the Sandisk Extreme III means that there is very
On 2/2/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My daughters istD and FA 70-200 came back from Pentax service
the other day.
You must like Pentax a lot to give your daughters those names and send
them off to be serviced.
I was going to name her Sue, but thats been done before.
Nice one Bob
Looks like a Nikon with 70-200 zoom.
D200 mostlikly.
Dave
On 2/2/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/2/07, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
I think she's aiming for the idiot with the Canon, isn't she? I know I
would.
Can't be a Canon, he's only holding it with one hand.
Sorry, i meant go detail.
:-)
Dave
On 2/2/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hate it when my photos have goo detail. Usually that happens when I
drink:-)
Paul
On Feb 2, 2007, at 7:34 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
Nice.
Hilites and shadows all have goo detail, and the geometry is
Thanks, Thibouille :-)
Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
Thibouille
I like this one., Goo detail.:-)
Might look good as a BW
Dave
On 2/2/07, Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Pentaxians
one of my first more unusual snow photo this year passing the Route 66 store
nearby.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5539941size=lg
Pentax SFX, Tamron
I'm not sure what it is. I only have one SD card so far. I sold the ones I
had, with the *ist DL.
It's a 2 GB Sandisk. I think it's called Standard, High Speed - which is -
anything but fast :-)
I know, that it (or the camera) made me wait, when I was shooting the
panorama sequence earlier today.
My brother-in-law (alas, a Nikon shooter) just got the Slingshot 200. He
really likes it. I think he packs more gear than I'm talking about though.
This 100 bag looks great...IF it'll fit.
I need to find one and check it out.
Mark, why don't you buy the grip and tell me if it fits in your
Hello Bob,
Friday, February 2, 2007, 6:28:14 AM, you wrote:
A simple test shot with the K10D and FA28/2.8
I like it for the light and texture in the trees.
I'm not sure what you will be able to see with Picasa.
http://picasaweb.google.com/rf.sullivan/Peso/photo#5026786255289584962
Really nice shot Tom.
Very peaceful
Dave
On 2/2/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Skiing two weeks ago at Bogus Basin. Close to the top of the Deer Point
chair. The wind was whipping the loose snow up on the ground.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5541388
Tom C.
--
Hello Marnie,
Friday, February 2, 2007, 5:59:32 PM, you wrote:
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/color.htm
Makes me think of Albuquerque in the fall -- an exuberance of color.
Comments, welcome. Also, do you think it is worth a print?
Marnie aka Doe :-)
That's a very
Hello John,
Friday, February 2, 2007, 8:29:52 PM, you wrote:
The skies finally cleared today so I took a walk around the local park with
the K10D and a couple of lenses during my lunch break.
Pentax K10D, SMC Pentax-FA 135 f/2.8 @ f/5.6 1/160th SR=on, RAW (DNG), ACR,
USM. Full image.
I have a LowePro Mini Trekker 100 and that's been great for toting all my
gear around for a while. When walking around or hiking (or climbing at GFM)
it's nice sometimes to put the camera away for a while and get a move-on.
With the backpack though, it takes longer and is more of an effort to
The composition and light is what makes this picture IMO.
Print it.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2. februar 2007 17:00
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO - Albuquerque
I like the Los Gatos Gengerbread and San Francisco Sunset. I think the
industrial abstract could be great with some more light in the lower
left and a slightly different camera position. Nice gallery, nice work.
Paul
On Feb 3, 2007, at 4:27 AM, David Savage wrote:
Nice stuff John.
I prefer
I picked this up from the Leica Users Group, information about an
article on Ernst Leitz as the other Schindler. In case anyone is
interested in corporate histories from the war. A lot of this re-
examination started, I think, when Bertelsmann bought Random House
and commissioned an
Daytonesque.
Intended as a compliment.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Charles Robinson
Sent: 2. februar 2007 17:41
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO - A bit odd
On Feb 2, 2007,
I have the Pentax FA20-35/4 AL. No experience with the Tokina. I'd be
very interested to know how it performs, comparatively.
The FA20-35/4 is as close to having four prime quality lenses in one
as I have seen in a zoom.
G
On Feb 2, 2007, at 9:01 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
One of our folks
No.
If Pentax were to go to a larger sensor tomorrow, I'd weigh whether I
needed it and what lenses I'd need to support it. Then buy them if I
felt there was an advantage.
The K10D and *ist DS would still be working so I wouldn't be 'stranded'.
All the DA lenses I've purchased have
Hi!
People, could anyone tell if except Sigma APO lenses there exist other
xx-300 zoom lenses that do not exhibit strong purple fringing towards
the 300 mm focal length?
Thanks.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Sandisk standard SD cards are 45x rating. Ultra II models (they're
clearly labeled) are 60x and Extreme III models (again clearly
labeled) are 133x.
For someone who who had an issue with camera speed at one time in the
past, it seems a little incongruous that you didn't buy a card to
It's been done before.
Bag Man
On Feb 2, 2007, at 7:12 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I think we should start calling Godders The Bag Man. :-)))
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Markus, the snow makes it really work for me. Great work.
Boris
Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi Pentaxians
one of my first more unusual snow photo this year passing the Route 66 store
nearby.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5539941size=lg
Pentax SFX, Tamron 90mm macro, Fuji Superia
Comes from being Dad to a young son... :-) Regards, Bob S.
On 2/3/07, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 03/02/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I must admit, I never expected *you* to be assimilated !
I'm apparently very malleable these days :-(
--
Rob Studdert
Cotty,
It's gotta be my laptop monitor, but I see nothing.
Are you looking on an Apple laptop or desktop?
Regards, Bob S.
On 2/3/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/2/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
I didn't see it either. I thought Cotty was joking. It's just in the
out
I can't directly answer your question, as I tend to steer clear of Sigma.
But last year when I was at a camera store I only rarely visit I had a
play with the Sigma 100-300 f4 APO (non DG version) that they had in
store. I only took 2 shots with it at the 100 300 FL's. For what
they're worth
I see the one on the right, but not the one through the moon.
BTW, nice photo Tom.
Cheers,
Dave
On 2/4/07, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cotty,
It's gotta be my laptop monitor, but I see nothing.
Are you looking on an Apple laptop or desktop?
Regards, Bob S.
On 2/3/07, Cotty
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
, I might buy some DA type
lenses I cant get otherwise like an extreme wide or extreme wide zoom,
but thats about
it for me.
Thats pretty much what I am doing.
With one exception, any DA lens I've bought (so
- Original Message -
From: David Savage Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
Your probably right.
If Pentax ever go the 35mm FF route they'll probably do what Nikon has
done, WRT supporting APS lenses.
I expect any larger than APS-C sensor cameras from Pentax will have a 645
mount.
Whoa, wait a minute Godders. That way too rational for the PDML. When
are you going to learn? We want to see some hand wringing and sensor
envy. :-))
Paul
On Feb 3, 2007, at 9:56 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
No.
If Pentax were to go to a larger sensor tomorrow, I'd weigh whether I
needed
From what I've heard and also from limited personal experience, Sigma lenses
are very good optically, but suffer in build quality.
Bill
Hi!
People, could anyone tell if except Sigma APO lenses there exist other
xx-300 zoom lenses that do not exhibit strong purple fringing towards
the 300 mm
I just watched a show on the history channel about current combat
photography. I found it interesting that the U.S. armed forces combat
photographers use Nikon equipment.
Bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 2/4/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David Savage Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
Your probably right.
If Pentax ever go the 35mm FF route they'll probably do what Nikon has
done, WRT supporting APS lenses.
I expect any larger than
John,
The sunset and 'twin' BMW's are my favorites, although the gingerbread
house and San Jose City Hall are not to shabby either!
Both galleries work fine with IE7, but I much prefer the white border.
I did the white first and it was slow to load, first posting the
corners of the pictures in
The last 2 ANZAC day parades I shot, the official Australian Navy
photographer was shooting with Nikon gear also.
Cheers,
Dave
On 2/4/07, Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just watched a show on the history channel about current combat
photography. I found it interesting that the U.S.
- Original Message -
From: Bill Owens
Subject: combat photography
I just watched a show on the history channel about current combat
photography. I found it interesting that the U.S. armed forces combat
photographers use Nikon equipment.
I recall reading somewhere that the F5
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
I expect any larger than APS-C sensor cameras from Pentax will have a 645
mount.
William Robb
I really hope your wrong Bill.
Think of the hand wringing then.
We could get reduced image circle lenses in two
Very well seen captured Tom.
If it were mine I'd crop it almost square to remove the patches of white in
the lower portion.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - Snow Moonset
Last nights full moon is commonly called the Snow Moon. This
On 2/4/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
I expect any larger than APS-C sensor cameras from Pentax will have a 645
mount.
William Robb
I really hope your wrong Bill.
Think of the hand
On 2/4/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Bill Owens
I just watched a show on the history channel about current combat
photography. I found it interesting that the U.S. armed forces combat
photographers use Nikon equipment.
I recall reading somewhere that the F5 would stop
From the looks of pinkish red color, it looks like it may have had a crack
check done to it. I can't recall the name of the material, but we used to
spray it on metal surfaces to highlight cracks.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Tamron 70-300 LD Macro (aka Nikon 70-300 ED)
-Adam
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
People, could anyone tell if except Sigma APO lenses there exist other
xx-300 zoom lenses that do not exhibit strong purple fringing towards
the 300 mm focal length?
Thanks.
Boris
--
PDML
Great subject, well exposed but I'd like it more without the top cutoff.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO:Gallons 66
Hi Pentaxians
one of my first more unusual snow photo this year passing the Route 66
store
nearby.
Fluorescing paint seen under a black light, or a dye penetrant test?
This just looks like ordinary paint to me.
Cheers,
Dave
On 2/4/07, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From the looks of pinkish red color, it looks like it may have had a crack
check done to it. I can't recall the name
Ok. He is the genius, so the framing must be brilliant ;-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob
W
Sent: 2. februar 2007 22:16
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: PESO - Famous Back
it
I predict Bill will be the first on the list to purchase a DA* USM
lens. I'll be right there with him if I have the cash. Judging by how
fast these lenses are, their * designation, and their feature set,
they're obviously intended to be high-end equipment. And they're for
reduced image
Micah,
A good story for today. Thanks.
Regards, Bob S.
On 2/3/07, Micah Kleit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I picked this up from the Leica Users Group, information about an
article on Ernst Leitz as the other Schindler. In case anyone is
interested in corporate histories from the war. A lot of
My dick is big enough already. ]'-)
G
On Feb 3, 2007, at 7:46 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Whoa, wait a minute Godders. That way too rational for the PDML. When
are you going to learn? We want to see some hand wringing and sensor
envy. :-))
Paul
On Feb 3, 2007, at 9:56 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi
I'm a sucker for nostalgia and snow ;-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Markus Maurer
Sent: 2. februar 2007 20:09
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO:Gallons 66
Hi Pentaxians
one of my
Bill Owens wrote:
I just watched a show on the history channel about current combat
photography. I found it interesting that the U.S. armed forces combat
photographers use Nikon equipment.
Bill
A friend's wife just went through the Combat photog school(Army), they
were using Canon
They probably know where they think they are headed. The question is,
who will do the thinking in the future.
--
Bruce
Friday, February 2, 2007, 9:16:32 PM, you wrote:
DIS On 03/02/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If Pentax was going to go full frame, they wouldn't be
Well I know how good the FA* lenses are. If it wasn't for the fact
that I couldn't afford them when they were readily available I'd have
one of each by now, instead of just one. Assuming the DA*'s are just
as good I'll eventually get some.
I'm not put off buying these reduced image circle lenses
Not rational at all, see my last post.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Paul Stenquist
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 10:46 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
Whoa, wait a minute Godders. That way too
I can't say for sure, but the shoulder straps appeared to be D1.
Bill
I just watched a show on the history channel about current combat
photography. I found it interesting that the U.S. armed forces combat
photographers use Nikon equipment.
Bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Interesting. The show was about USMC combat photographer.
A friend's wife just went through the Combat photog school(Army), they
were using Canon stuff there.
But the US Navy and Marines has long used Nikon stuff (in fact they kept
the Nikon F3 in short run production for several years
I dont understand, current DA lenses wont work on
FF cameras. I think you are not understanding what
FF/DA is all about. The reason DA lenses can work
better on APS digital cameras is they are optimized
for APS only digital format. There is no conclusive evidence
(yet that I have seen) that any
FF would make much more sense to me, the sensor could
be more than doubled in size for very little
overall increase in body and lens size as it
could/will use same lensmount and K mount lenses. 645 would require
a much bigger, bulky, body and non k mount lenses.
jco
-Original Message-
In a message dated 2/2/2007 12:47:05 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Last nights full moon is commonly called the Snow Moon. This was from this
morning as it set in the northwest.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5540370
Tom C.
=
Cool shot. Very
In a message dated 2/2/2007 12:48:44 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Great Capture! Unusual composition.
Kenneth Waller
===
Thanks, Ken. And Bob and Joe. Glad to know they are cottonwoods.
Okay, I got enough votes for a print. :-) (Considering the cost of
Coming back from India a few days ago I was sitting next to a man who
immigrated to San Francisco from Russia a decade ago. We started talking
about photography and he said he wanted to scan his old film from Russia but
the developed rolls were stored tightly rolled up. Now the film is brittle
In a message dated 2/2/2007 3:36:56 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My light walk-around bag will not work with the extra bulk of the K10 with
the grip.
What have you, who have had the camera longer than I, found to be a good
compromise?
I really liked Nico's Velocity
I've had three Sigmas, and still have one.
-
Oh...PS. I used (but did not own) the Sigma 20 mm F1.8 DG. I considered
getting one because I was dissatisfied with the wide open performance of
the FA* 24 F2. But when I compared the Sigma 20 to the FA 20 F2.8, the
Pentax lens was so superior
From what I've heard and also from limited personal experience, Sigma
lenses
are very good optically, but suffer in build quality.
Bill
-
I've had three Sigmas, and still have one.
APO 70-300 F4.5.6 Macro. Really sucked at 300 mm. Images appeared out of
focus, especially at the edges.
In a message dated 1/17/2007 11:56:31 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My cameras don't like being anthropomorphised.
- Dave
===
ROLFMAO.
Marnie aka Doe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
William Robb wrote:
I expect any larger than APS-C sensor cameras from Pentax will have
a 645 mount.
I think just the opposite: 645 mount is dead.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Bill Owens wrote:
From what I've heard and also from limited personal experience,
Sigma lenses are very good optically, but suffer in build quality.
Depends which one you get. The one Sigma I own is built as well as any
of my Pentax lenses.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
If Pentax were to go to a larger sensor tomorrow, I'd weigh whether I
needed it and what lenses I'd need to support it. Then buy them if I
felt there was an advantage.
The K10D and *ist DS would still be working so I wouldn't be 'stranded'.
Of course. All this talk
I'd expect it to be similar to the 28-105 zooms offered previously;
probably no faster than f5.6 at the long end. I see this lens as
being part of a two-lens kit with the 70-300. Note that they are
DA lenses, not DA*; the target demographic is probably price-driven.
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at
I just watched a show on the history channel about current combat
photography. I found it interesting that the U.S. armed
forces combat
photographers use Nikon equipment.
I recall reading somewhere that the F5 would stop a bullet.
Might have been hype.
I don't think it would
In a message dated 2/3/2007 10:30:31 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 12:39:57PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ROLFMAO.
Marnie aka Doe
Andre
I don't think that means what you think it means.
/Andre
===
Rolling on the floor laughing
In a message dated 2/2/2007 1:25:32 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would liked to have been able to see a bit more of the front and from
an angle further to the right.
Glad I get the impression that its being well maintained.
Jack
=
I have more of the back
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 12:39:57PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ROLFMAO.
Marnie aka Doe
Andre
I don't think that means what you think it means.
/Andre
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks Godfrey, Paul, David S, Jack D, Tim, Marnie, and Boris for
looking and the comments. I was wondering about the sharpness of the
photo as it was taken with the FA28 at f6.7 and should be pretty
sharp. I went back and put a sharpened version out there, as I seemed
to have forgotten to use
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I was there, so I had to take it, right? :-)
After seeing your Albuquerque (yes I think they are cottonwoods, too) trees,
and you having told me you went there,
I knew what this was before I looked at the pic - or at least I
suspected what it was -
still,it is
I totally get it. My comments were just to say that if I were there I'd
look over the front.
No big!
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/2/2007 1:25:32 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would liked to have been able to see a bit more of the front
Thanks for commenting David.
Most of this industrial things look good and sometimes even stronger in
black and white IMHO, I like a slight touch of sepia too.
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
David J Brooks
Sent: Saturday,
Hi,
went for another stroll around London to see how the newly acquired
14-54 lens performs. I'm quite pleased with it - it seems to be very
sharp. These pictures are straight out the camera with no colour
fooling around. Shot raw, iso 100, daylight. If anything it's more
saturated than I really
Thanks Boris, I got some more nice industrial and flower snow close-up
shots on that roll of film... :-)
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Boris Liberman
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 4:25 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Hi Kenneth
thanks for looking and your comment.
I have indeed made 2 more photos of the same subject from different
distances.
I'm therefore sure you and Paul will like this one much more:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5545723size=lg
As the first one this is uncropped, I tried some
The DA* lenses are better than the FAs in at least two ways: USM and
weather sealing. And they're as fast as the best of the FAs.
Paul
On Feb 3, 2007, at 11:55 AM, David Savage wrote:
Well I know how good the FA* lenses are. If it wasn't for the fact
that I couldn't afford them when they were
Not sure why, but I was sure I had to have one. So now I do. I added it to
my collection of 4 other pentax slr bodies and 3 med format bodies. Now
why would a single person need that many camera's not counting the 3 point
and shoot pentax camera's I have.
On a different note. I love
On 04/02/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really hope your wrong Bill.
So do I, a FF sensor under a K-mount with DA lens detection and the
potential to auto-crop to 6-8 MP APS would be near ideal.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL
It would have to auto crop to 10 t0 12 megapixels to make me and
other DA lens owners happy. Which means it would have to be a full
frame sensor on the order of the top of the line camera, which means
it would be a $6000 camera. All of that is reason to believe it won't
happen. But I'll be
On 04/02/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The last 2 ANZAC day parades I shot, the official Australian Navy
photographer was shooting with Nikon gear also.
The offical Air force images from the recent Sydney Air show were shot
on Nikon (D70s) and Canon (EOS-1D Mark II N), following is
Don't be afraid of RAW. It will expand your horizons significantly.
But do get a good RAW converter. PhotoShop CS., CS2 or Elements.
Battery life seems to be close to 1000 frames with no built-in flash
use and moderate chimping.
Paul
On Feb 3, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Sandra Hermann wrote:
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Bill Owens
Subject: combat photography
I just watched a show on the history channel about current combat
photography. I found it interesting that the U.S. armed forces combat
photographers use Nikon equipment.
I recall
On 04/02/07, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More likely a .22
Or baton round.
A BB from a modified air rifle perhaps? ;-)
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user
On 04/02/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would have to auto crop to 10 t0 12 megapixels to make me and
other DA lens owners happy.
If Pentax had delivered a 6-8MP body with the functionality of the
K10D but significantly improved noise, DR and sensitivity over the
existing 6MP
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
