Breakfast-with-the-Giraffes
They say that if you sup with the devil you should use a long spoon. I
believe the same is true when you breakfast with giraffes.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Sawyer
Sent: 08 February
I don't know, but you pot of twigs looks nice.
Cheers,
Dave
On 2/8/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you think maybe it's not getting enough water?
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5568636size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/07 Wed PM 11:56:08 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Long-delayed GFM shots
I shot a roll of Kodak Plus-X in the 645 at GFM last June. Scott
Loveless actually souped the stuff for me on site but I didn't get
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/08 Thu AM 12:21:33 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: what's the best way to ship something overseas from the US?
At 01:50 AM 8/02/2007, Christian wrote:
Amita Guha wrote:
I just had to ship two lenses to
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/08 Thu AM 01:13:23 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Long-delayed GFM shots
Verynice.
The BW really give it a soul.
I did not shoot the 6x7 last year, but will now.
Dave
You will probably need a .357
On 08/02/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Loveless wrote:
On 2/7/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/gfmbw/
Verynice.
The BW really give it soul.
Thanks. Coming from GFM's King of Infrared that's high
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Heavy on the pocket and beyond:
Seemingly a rear lens: A 400/2.8
http://www.adorama.com/US%20%20%20%20248576.html
The price seems to be rather reasonable: $2.5K for this expensive lens.
(I cannot justify anything over $1000 for myself.)
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I've heard less credible rumors on the DA55, but here's hoping it's
an f/2 or faster too!
That should be extremely straightforward:
http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/lenses/primes/normal/K55f1.8.html
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Cotty wrote:
On 7/2/07, Joseph Tainter, discombobulated, unleashed:
UPS and others charge extortionate brokerage fees
and if they fail to deliver, their collection points are miles away.
Parcel Force collection points are scattered evenly about and the
nearest is a ten
On 2/8/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/6/2007 1:39:38 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Checkout this fellow:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/tayside_and_central/6335491.stm
Funny, as bad as talking on a cell
Thanks Bruce.
On Feb 7, 2007, at 11:25 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
I rather like this. It is about the two of them reading together and
it is well depicted. Knowing their relationship enhances the image.
--
Bruce
Wednesday, February 7, 2007, 6:20:06 PM, you wrote:
PS Grace and my mom. DA
Nothing at all worng with that shot :-)
Nicely done.
Cheers,
Dave
On 2/8/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the side of a house my great grandfather built in 1858. He came from
Scotland to California for the California Gold Rush. He did end up making a
good bit of
I'm glad it made you smile.
Paul
On Feb 8, 2007, at 1:24 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
ROTFLMAO
P. J. Alling wrote:
McCoy
It's Dead Jim.
/mccoy
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Do you think maybe it's not getting enough water?
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5568636size=lg
--
PDML
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the side of a house my great grandfather built in 1858. He came from
Scotland to California for the California Gold Rush. He did end up making a
good bit of money -- with a cattle ranch. :-)
When I went up to northern Northern California to visit Scott
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Do you think maybe it's not getting enough water?
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5568636size=lg
That's plenty of water; just in the wrong state (chemically and
geographically)
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 14:13:57 +0100 (CET), Frank Wajer wrote:
grab them while you can. 650 euro a piece.
I already have both of them, they are awesome.
Well, they are gone, after trying to convince myself for two
days I did not need the 135, I gave them a call anyway :-)
These two for 650
I like it. Do you have any that show the whole house? It's an
interesting bit of history.
Paul
On Feb 8, 2007, at 6:04 AM, David Savage wrote:
Nothing at all worng with that shot :-)
Nicely done.
Cheers,
Dave
On 2/8/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the side of a
Eric Featherstone wrote:
On 08/02/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I can get a SCSI card for my laptop I could bring the Minolta Scan
Multi!
Something like one of these should do it:
If i have room, i'll bring my tank.
If i don't shoot any BW film, i can drink soup from it then.:-)
Dave
On 2/7/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/7/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/gfmbw/
Verynice.
The
On 2/7/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/gfmbw/
Verynice.
The BW really give it soul.
Thanks. Coming from GFM's King of Infrared that's high praise, indeed!
Oh Oh. Talk about pressure for this year.:)
I did not shoot the
Yes, that happened to me this time. The part I find annoying is that
one delivery attempt is made and then the customer isn't notified for
a couple of days, or even a week, unless I track it down on my end.
Amita
On 2/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had to track a USPS lens
On 2/7/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's time Pentax balanced out their lineup and released a DFA* 200mm f4
Macro, to replace the FA* version they boneheadedly discontinued before I
could afford it :-)
I know there aren't a lot of Sigma fans on this list, but Sigma just
released
No, I was talking about regular Express Mail, though I'm starting to
think about using Global Express. I just hate charging $80 and up for
shipping.
Amita
On 2/7/07, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You mean USPS Global Express? That is about the best way in my limited
experience. Two weeks
On 2/8/07, Amita Guha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/7/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's time Pentax balanced out their lineup and released a DFA* 200mm f4
Macro, to replace the FA* version they boneheadedly discontinued before I
could afford it :-)
I know there aren't a lot
On 2/8/07, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
My old man was quite surprised to be receiving a Christmas gift in
February. :-)
Dave (from the arse end of the planet)
I'm still waiting for a copy of a certain book. Three years.
Isn't that
It must be nice to be able to spend large sums of money to replace
perfectly function lenses for a marginal increase in performance and
functionality. Mandated deprication (read: loss of aperture coupler)
aside, obtaining 95% of the optical performance for 10% of the expense
sounds like
you are calling not performing as well. I dont
think its fair or show's much understanding
to describe them that way when you are using
DA lenses optimized for APS on APS with FF lenses
which are optimized for FF but not using
them FF and are only using them on APS. Sure
This
yep, I meant comparing instead of using.
Thanks for the clarification request.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Cory Papenfuss
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 8:19 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
you
If I had to buy all new lenses for any DSLR,
I wouldnt buy a pentax DSLR. The main advantage
of buying a Pentax DSLR is if you already have
a bunch of Pentax Lenses. If you dont or have
to, or need to buy all new ones, I would go with canon
as they have more bodies/lenses to choose from and
On 08/02/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Featherstone wrote:
On 08/02/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I can get a SCSI card for my laptop I could bring the Minolta Scan
Multi!
Something like one of these should do it:
On 2/8/07, Eric Featherstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 08/02/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Featherstone wrote:
On 08/02/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I can get a SCSI card for my laptop I could bring the Minolta Scan
Multi!
Something like one
- Original Message -
From: Thibouille
Subject: Re: Trying to buy the LightRoom
N only a sor of warranty which would warrant (obviously) that your
lovely $1000 software will still be useful onece new Window$ or OSX or
whatever comes out or new ACR or whatever.
This sort of forcing
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
If I had to buy all new lenses for any DSLR,
I wouldnt buy a pentax DSLR. The main advantage
of buying a Pentax DSLR is if you already have
a bunch of Pentax Lenses. If you dont or have
to, or need to buy
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
All of my comments made in this thread regarding
APS and FF lenses (legacy?) were optical quality related
to format (sensor) size, not feature set
issues. That is another unrelated matter altogether.
- Original Message -
From: Cory Papenfuss
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
For the hobbyist, it's a lot harder to justify big money on lenses
that produce images at best marginally better than older, cheaper ones
(provided they're willing to forgo the nicey new features like AF).
Beautiful exposure and composition. Love the textures and technical
imperfections of its rough hand constructions.
I lived near a place in northern CA. named Scott's Valley, which is
located between San Jose and Santa Cruz, but noted that there are other
Scott Valleys in the state. I don't think
On 2/8/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
N only a sor of warranty which would warrant (obviously) that your
lovely $1000 software will still be useful onece new Window$ or OSX or
whatever comes out or new ACR or whatever.
This sort of forcing you to upgrade is lame to say the
http://roman.blakout.net/r-rated/640x640-samsung_GX10.jpg
^^^ Samsung versiuon of K10D
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Speaking of upgrades.
My home PC is running Win XP SP1. Please don't try to convince me it
is not good. Now, LR comes and says - I shall run on SP1, but you
should upgrade to SP2 so that with SP1 you won't get any support from
my team. Bullshit if you ask me. What on earth makes SP2 so much
On 2/8/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In September 2005 I bought my wife a Mac Mini for her birthday. When
she opened it she asked me if Adobe offered special pricing for
switching from the PC version to the Mac version of Photoshop, and
Out of curiousity Scott, how much would it
On 2/8/07, Mat Maessen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/8/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In September 2005 I bought my wife a Mac Mini for her birthday. When
she opened it she asked me if Adobe offered special pricing for
switching from the PC version to the Mac version of
Roman wrote:
http://roman.blakout.net/r-rated/640x640-samsung_GX10.jpg
^^^ Samsung versiuon of K10D
Breaking news, everyone :-)
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 2/8/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of upgrades.
My home PC is running Win XP SP1. Please don't try to convince me it
is not good. Now, LR comes and says - I shall run on SP1, but you
should upgrade to SP2 so that with SP1 you won't get any support from
my team.
On Feb 8, 2007, at 6:40 AM, Mat Maessen wrote:
On 2/8/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In September 2005 I bought my wife a Mac Mini for her birthday. When
she opened it she asked me if Adobe offered special pricing for
switching from the PC version to the Mac version of
On 2/8/07, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roman wrote:
http://roman.blakout.net/r-rated/640x640-samsung_GX10.jpg
^^^ Samsung versiuon of K10D
Breaking news, everyone :-)
More good news from everyone's favorite write-only user.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/08 Thu PM 02:45:02 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Trying to buy the LightRoom
Speaking of upgrades.
My home PC is running Win XP SP1. Please don't try to convince me it
is not good. Now, LR comes and
Boris Liberman wrote:
Speaking of upgrades.
My home PC is running Win XP SP1. Please don't try to convince me it
is not good. Now, LR comes and says - I shall run on SP1, but you
should upgrade to SP2 so that with SP1 you won't get any support from
my team. Bullshit if you ask me. What on
Well,
I didn't know that there was a Samsung 12-24 lens...
- Mensaje original
De: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Enviado: jueves, 8 de febrero, 2007 15:58:24
Asunto: Re: 640x640-samsung_GX10.jpg (JPEG Image, 640x640 pixels)
Roman wrote:
On Feb 8, 2007, at 6:45 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
My home PC is running Win XP SP1. Please don't try to convince me it
is not good. Now, LR comes and says - I shall run on SP1, but you
should upgrade to SP2 so that with SP1 you won't get any support from
my team. Bullshit if you ask me. What
In a message dated 2/8/2007 4:02:53 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I like it. Do you have any that show the whole house? It's an
interesting bit of history.
Paul
===
Thanks, Paul. Uh, not entirely, no. Part of the front, I think. It was
midday when I arrived
In a message dated 2/7/2007 6:15:01 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do you think maybe it's not getting enough water?
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5568636size=lg
==
LOL.
Too much water. Of the frozen variety.
Thanks for the laugh.
Marnie aka
In a message dated 2/7/2007 8:33:07 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello Rick,
It is a pretty cool tree. I agree that there is a shot or three in
there. This one doesn't seem to be it for me. I would certainly look
at a lower angle, different perspectives, different
Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
Well,
I didn't know that there was a Samsung 12-24 lens...
You mean a Pentax lens with a blue ring instead of green and a fake
German name on it.
I've no issue with rebranding stuff, like the body and lenses, but what
annoys me is that places like PopPhoto make it
In a message dated 2/7/2007 10:24:06 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's a fine photo. The only thing I would say is that it looks
like you're looking down on that wall, so the vertical lines of the
window -- which I'm sure weren't parallel anyway -- look a bit
Beautiful exposure and composition. Love the textures and technical
imperfections of its rough hand constructions.
I lived near a place in northern CA. named Scott's Valley, which is
located between San Jose and Santa Cruz, but noted that there are other
Scott Valleys in the state. I don't
In a message dated 2/7/2007 9:11:47 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Try the Polo then...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1aVSXvcV3M
William Robb
=
That has got to be one of the worst commercials, ever.
Like in really, really, really bad taste.
Marnie aka
In a message dated 2/6/2007 9:46:48 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
;-)
From a 10k race I photographed a couple of weeks ago...
http://www.robertstech.com/run/graphics/pages/7d700259.htm
=
Cute. Love the pink gloves.
And I don't get it.
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
Ah, of course it is rebranded...I was just trying to find some actual news in
the original post
;-)
- Mensaje original
De: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Enviado: jueves, 8 de febrero, 2007 17:01:41
Asunto: Re: 640x640-samsung_GX10.jpg (JPEG
Nice shot and angle Rick.
Give Frank a shout, he'll blur it up fer ya.
vbg
Dave
On 2/7/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This tree has fascinated me since I first saw it a few
months ago. This morning, after the closest thing
Philly has had to a snowstorm this winter, I took a
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/technology/article1343516.ece
http://tinyurl.com/373zmj
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
All of my comments made in this thread regarding
APS and FF lenses (legacy?) were optical quality related
to format (sensor) size, not feature set
issues. That is another unrelated matter altogether.
Bullshit. It's part and parcel of what the lens can do.
William Robb
So, without
He might have made more money if his house had three other sides.vbg
Sorry, feebel humor atttempt.
I like the shot and the conversion.
Good detail in the logs and window.
Dave
On 2/8/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the side of a house my great grandfather built in
The one near Yreka is, also, a Scott Valley. It's well up north, not
far from the small town of Fort Jones.
My Scott's Valley is nearer central state and a few thousand feet up in
the Santa Cruz Mtns..
My offerings here are rather pointless (as usual), just idol finger
prattle.
Thanks, always,
On 2/8/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the side of a house my great grandfather built in 1858. He
came from
Scotland to California for the California Gold Rush. He did end up
making a
good bit of money -- with a cattle ranch. :-)
...
I wasn't using a tripod,
From: Cory Papenfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:52:09 -0500 (EST)
All of my comments made in this thread regarding
APS and FF lenses (legacy?) were
On 2/8/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/technology/article1343516.ece
http://tinyurl.com/373zmj
So who's down and out so far? Agfa and Forte? Anyone else? I really
expected Kodak to be the last man standing.
This could be
On Feb 8, 2007, at 8:52 AM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
All of my comments made in this thread regarding
APS and FF lenses (legacy?) were optical quality related
to format (sensor) size, not feature set
issues. That is another unrelated matter altogether.
Bullshit. It's part and parcel of what
Igor Roshchin wrote on Wed, 07 Feb 2007 12:32:52 -0800:
(snip)
Heavy on the pocket and beyond:
Seemingly a rear lens: A 400/2.8
http://www.adorama.com/US%20%20%20%20248576.html
The price seems to be rather reasonable: $2.5K for this expensive
lens.
(I cannot justify anything over $1000
--
So, without consideration of operator error, what exactly does a
new lens' feature set do to improve the resultant picture quality? The
improved contrast of having autofocus? The increase of sharpness due to
not having an auto-aperture? Bullshit.
If you're too damn lazy to
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:50:07PM +, Eric Featherstone wrote:
On 08/02/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Featherstone wrote:
On 08/02/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I can get a SCSI card for my laptop I could bring the Minolta Scan
Multi!
Igor Roshchin wrote on Wed, 07 Feb 2007 12:32:52 -0800:
(snip)
Heavy on the pocket and beyond:
Seemingly a rear lens: A 400/2.8
http://www.adorama.com/US%20%20%20%20248576.html
The price seems to be rather reasonable: $2.5K for this expensive
lens.
(I cannot justify anything over $1000
On 2/8/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/technology/article1343516.ece
http://tinyurl.com/373zmj
I'd like to think that Fuji or Ilford may have an interest in Kodak's
technology,
at the very least.
Scott Loveless
Fujak?
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 11:32:14AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/7/2007 9:11:47 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Try the Polo then...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1aVSXvcV3M
William Robb
=
That has got to be one of the worst
If you only consider one parameter when you are making an equipment
purchase you
are a fool.
Glass quality is certainly the most important part of a lens buying
decision,
but it isn't the only part.
In context, a couple of people on list have noted that the newer lenses do
a
better job of
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:19:37AM -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
But calling someone who wants to take advantage of pattern evaluative
metering, linked AE and focus point, MTF prioritized exposure
metering, automatic recognition of lens focal length for image
stabilization, improved
On 2/8/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/8/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/technology/article1343516.ece
http://tinyurl.com/373zmj
I'd like to think that Fuji or Ilford may have an interest in Kodak's
Scott Loveless wrote:
I really expected Kodak to be the last man standing.
boggle
You must be referring to a different Kodak than the one I've been
observing for the past 20 years or so! I'm surprised they've survived
this long, given their management.
If Kodak wasn't planning on selling off
Just a small comment:
My A*135mm 1.8 and FA100mm 2.8 macro are not as good on my dslrs as
they are on film. This is not because of the smaller sensor size but
because they are optimized for film, not sensors. If Pentax made a
FF camera they would have to make new lenses that were
Scott Loveless wrote:
On 2/8/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/technology/article1343516.ece
http://tinyurl.com/373zmj
So who's down and out so far? Agfa and Forte? Anyone else? I really
expected Kodak to be the last man
In a message dated 2/8/2007 9:19:50 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The one near Yreka is, also, a Scott Valley. It's well up north, not
far from the small town of Fort Jones.
===
Fort Jones is IN Scott Valley. Yup, that's the one.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
--
On 2/8/07, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 11:32:14AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/7/2007 9:11:47 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Try the Polo then...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1aVSXvcV3M
William Robb
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 12:22:23PM -0500, Jim King wrote:
Thanks (I think) for the post, Igor. I've been looking for a copy of
this monster in reasonably good condition and at a reasonable price
for my collection of A and A* primes. I pulled the trigger and
ordered it from Adorama
On 08/02/07, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:50:07PM +, Eric Featherstone wrote:
On 08/02/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Featherstone wrote:
On 08/02/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I can get a SCSI card for my
Quoting Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bill, I respectfully disagree with you here. Your achievements have nothing
to do with whether someone else knows what they're talking about.
True, but they at least give my opinions some credibility
My objective opinion is that this thread is degenerating
Nice capture.
Reminds me of buildings I've seen in Bodie, Ca, The Grand Tetons Wyoming.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - Homestead
This is the side of a house my great grandfather built in 1858. He came
from
Scotland to California for
It's Dead Jim.
It ain't dead, its just resting.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: What's wrong with my geranium?
ROTFLMAO
P. J. Alling wrote:
McCoy
It's Dead Jim.
/mccoy
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Do you think maybe
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you only consider one parameter when you are making an equipment
purchase you
are a fool.
Did anyone say that?
Glass quality is certainly the most important part of a lens buying
decision,
but it isn't the only part.
In context, a couple of people on list have noted
On 2/7/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The look kinda like ammo cans, but they're very small. They fit 6 or
8 35mm cassettes side by side. Once the kids are in bed I'll grab a
still from the movie so everyone can see what I'm trying to describe.
I couldn't get a screen shot.
Quoting Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Composition trumps all. :-)
At least is is actually completely separate from equipment.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 2/8/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Loveless wrote:
I really expected Kodak to be the last man standing.
I wasn't very clear. What I meant to say was that I expected to Kodak
to hold on to the film business to the bitter end.
boggle
You must be referring to a different
In a message dated 2/8/2007 9:13:59 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 2/8/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the side of a house my great grandfather built in 1858. He
came from
Scotland to California for the California Gold Rush. He did end
In a message dated 2/8/2007 8:44:59 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
He might have made more money if his house had three other sides.vbg
Sorry, feebel humor atttempt.
I like the shot and the conversion.
Good detail in the logs and window.
Dave
=
Thanks, Dave.
Eric Featherstone wrote:
On 08/02/07, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What you really want (assuming your laptop supports it, of course) is
a cardbus card. These are, naturally, more expensive :-(. They look
just like a PCMCIA card (except for a gold stripe). I can't remember
when
Screw you, I know more about what I was talking
about and what I posted than you do. when I was talking about the
imaging
capability IN THIS THREAD, of course I was referring
to optical qualities of FF(legacy? - not my term) lenses on
APS/Future FF digital vs DA lenses on APS digital which are
Eric Featherstone wrote:
Or even Firewire-SCSI converters, though they are also more expensive
:-(
http://www.synchrotech.com/product-1394/firewire-uscsi-conv_01.html
Under $80.00! I'm gonna get one!
OK everyone going to GFM: You'll be able to shoot medium format BW for
the digital photo
On 2/8/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was a hint that because I am finding the options that lenses designed to
complement my camera give me are desirable, that i am somehow a lazy
photographer. I take umbrage with that.
If you weren't lazy you'd be toting a ten pound
On 2/8/07, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rumour has it that Forte's factory may have been sold. But it seriously
needed an upgrade (they were running pre-WW2 equipment).
Kodak wants to sell its film line, not shut it down. I suspect that if
they sell it, the film unit will outlast Kodak
On 2/8/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Featherstone wrote:
On 08/02/07, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What you really want (assuming your laptop supports it, of course) is
a cardbus card. These are, naturally, more expensive :-(. They look
just like a PCMCIA card
Quoting J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Screw you, I know more about what I was talking
about and what I posted than you do.
Nice that you think so.
Dag, Godfrey and myself all seem to have experienced something that disagrees
with you regarding film optimized lenses though.
Pentax and the
On 2/08/07 12:45 PM, Adam Maas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kodak wants to sell its film line, not shut it down. I suspect that if
they sell it, the film unit will outlast Kodak proper.
I understand that Fuji has been instigating return to film (paraphrasing)
campaign for quite some time. Not
1 - 100 of 274 matches
Mail list logo
