So is SP2 now.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tim Øsleby
Sent: 09 February 2007 01:21
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: Trying to buy the LightRoom
I'll answer for Boris.
Because SP1 is a legacy operating
Hi Jack,
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 14:59:38 -0800 (PST), Jack Davis wrote:
Thanks! I've tried it both ways and get a flashed image with the
on-board flash in both setting.
Hmm, are sure it are no reflections you see,
or perhaps the pre-flash ?
The 360 is held in such a way as to not cover the same
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 22:33:26 +0200, Basil Vizgin wrote:
Page 72 lists what modes trailing curtian can be used in.
Just tried mine with following results.
Tv. P-TTL pre flash. Flash when shutter opens, flash when shutter closes.
TAv.as above
Av. as above
M. P-TTL pre flash. Flash
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 18:18:37 -0800 (PST), Jack Davis wrote:
The on-board flash must pre-flash, as I understand it,
to convey needed settings to the off camera flash.
Yes, exactly
When the on-board is set as a controller it should fire out of
sink to avoid affecting the picture.
Do I
This is just Beta testing for the site and forewarned is forearmed, etc but
still.
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/traveltax/
-
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Because IMO anyone should be able to change PC without trouble. The
problem is you often need/get (depends) another OS when you buy
another PC. Of course you can scrap Vista and install XP but in 2
years?
Of course now the stories are about XP - Vista but the problem
exists for long. Wanna try
I have it working now. Works great with the K10D. A test:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5572447
Paul
Hi Paul
Was it the battery? Mine's not working and I wondered what battery it takes.
John
No, I didn't realize that the camera had to be switched to wireless
remote mode.
Paul
On Feb 9, 2007, at 5:39 AM, John Whittingham wrote:
I have it working now. Works great with the K10D. A test:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5572447
Paul
Hi Paul
Was it the battery? Mine's
So it works in M mode? That's what I use for flash photography anyway.
But I'm sure the next firmware update will fix this.
Paul
On Feb 9, 2007, at 3:08 AM, jim wrote:
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 22:33:26 +0200, Basil Vizgin wrote:
Page 72 lists what modes trailing curtian can be used in.
Just tried
I agree with Scott 100% as a former Sterling Drug employee. They
purchased Sterling and years latter there was nothing left of what it
was as an organization. It was dismembered in parts like a rag doll and
when they saw they could not do any more harm they sold what was left,
they may have
Ah, no worries. I'll pop it open over the weekend and have a look.
John
The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed and may contain
confidential
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
What advantage does running a legacy operating system with poor
security get you?
I think SP1 didn't kill your system if you are running an unregistered
version of XP, and SP2 does a better check and disables it if it thinks
it is pirated.
--
Christian
From: K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Viewing from an armchair, its not at all consistent.
What IS consistent is the common theme of I am always superior to you
Mark!
-
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software
P. J. Alling wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
Isn't Film still profitable?
On a per-roll or percentage basis. But making a big percentage profit
per roll doesn't work when the number of rolls sold drops below a
certain level.
So a roll of film is very profitable but
From: J. C. O'Sealion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WELL THEN, are you are are you not saying
Mark!
-
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 2/7/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I shot a roll of Kodak Plus-X in the 645 at GFM last June. Scott
Loveless actually souped the stuff for me on site but I didn't get
around to scanning them until a couple of weeks ago. No real standouts
amongst them but a few that aren't bad.
I always had a problem adjusting for wireless flash controller with
*istD. I tried with the K10D yesterday and still wasn't happy. I
just ordered those cheapy radio slave triggers to fire my pair of
360s to see if they do a better job. I've never been happy using the
onboard flash for
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0609/06092102pentaxdastarlenses.asp
Any information, MTF test results on new pentax lenses? Estimated retail
price? anything...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Indeed, M$ implemented a better check against pirates but sp2 also
inviolves some compatibility problems with a couple softwares, not
many but some which *may* be critical for some. Here's an example:
My parents have/had (depends on their mind) the habits of using a
software which is Weihgt
No, lots of talks but nothing new.
2007/2/9, Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0609/06092102pentaxdastarlenses.asp
Any information, MTF test results on new pentax lenses? Estimated retail
price? anything...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/08 Thu PM 11:38:10 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Pogue debunks the megapixel myth. Somewhat
Of course you can input 400 dpi to an inkjet if you wish, but it
doesn't seem to make it any better.
On 2/1/07, David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This has to be about the scariest video I've ever seen. These guys
wouldn't last 5 minutes in my city.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=nR2ygFn-yR8
- Dave
As the only (former) bike courier on this list (that I know of), I
feel equiped to comment
Yes, it does. Will be curious to learn how it works for you.
I have to say that I've been fine with the on-board fill the few times
I've used it.
Jack
--- Micah Kleit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I always had a problem adjusting for wireless flash controller with
*istD. I tried with the K10D
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/09 Fri AM 12:06:39 GMT
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: Made in England
On 8/2/07, Frits Wüthrich, discombobulated, unleashed:
Wat is that, a Morris Minor?
Moggie Minor!
AKA Jellymould
On 2/9/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/7/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I shot a roll of Kodak Plus-X in the 645 at GFM last June. Scott
Loveless actually souped the stuff for me on site but I didn't get
around to scanning them until a couple of weeks ago. No
Roman,
Your link points toward old news (pre-photokina preview). No updated more
info since Sep. 2006.
It is likely we'll see the actual products introduced at next PMA (end of
February), to be put on sale next March-April, hence no MTF test results and
no pricing available.
Dario
-
Knarf!! You're alive!!
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/7/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I shot a roll of Kodak Plus-X in the 645 at GFM
last June. Scott
Loveless actually souped the stuff for me on site
but I didn't get
around to scanning them until a couple
I did another test this AM and have to admit that I do see a difference
in the flash exposure between the two settings. Separated from the 360,
the controller setting does produce its own poorly lit image.
Jack
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack.
I tried the wireless mode after
Doing my usual morning browsing through BH, I found a tamron lens
coming soon; don't know if this has come up before:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?
O=SearchA=detailsQ=sku=363813is=REGaddedTroughType=search
There's a MF-AF switch at the base. Is it possible that this is a
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/09 Fri AM 02:39:04 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: combat photography
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:21:42PM -0500, John Sessoms wrote:
This one (for the ford Ka) runs it pretty close for bad taste:
Peter, these are lovely. It is amazing what a
difference subtle changes make. I would love to see
actual prints someday.
Rick
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I forgot, I added a gradient layer in each case to
try to emulate the
look of a Platinum Print. I don't know how
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/09 Fri AM 03:00:17 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: Made in England
and the hypothesis that all of them were painted lilac.
That's just sick, (and I don't mean in a good way).
As an American, I'm not
...And the guy with the helmet mounted camera is the craziest one of the
lot.
frank theriault wrote:
On 2/1/07, David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This has to be about the scariest video I've ever seen. These guys
wouldn't last 5 minutes in my city.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=nR2ygFn-yR8
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
From: J. C. O'Sealion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WELL THEN, are you are are you not saying
I mean really, how the hell are you supposed to respond to childish
gibberish like that?
William Robb
--
PDML
Only thing to watch out for (if it is the same as other remotes) is that the
battery location is not marked for pos/neg, so you need to remember which way
it came out.
From: John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/09 Fri AM 11:26:23 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Thibouille
Subject: Re: Trying to buy the LightRoom
I don't think it is should be considered normal to get free upgrades
on product. I think that, for the price of a software like PS, you
should at least be sure that if Vista or any other OS comes out,
- Original Message -
From: Brian Dunn
Subject: Re: Kodak May Get Out of Film Sooner
They could have kept film alive longer with better scanning at time of
processing. The usual 1200dpi gives around a 5M pixel scan with great
dynamic range ( each pixel is scanned for each of three
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/09 Fri PM 03:11:38 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
From: J. C. O'Sealion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Brian Dunn
Subject: Re: Kodak May Get Out of Film Sooner
They could have kept film alive longer with better scanning at time of
processing. The usual 1200dpi gives around a 5M pixel scan with great
dynamic range ( each pixel is
Pretty much all the 19-35 f3.5-4.5's are actually Cosina lenses.
Tokina, Tamron, Vivitar and several others all rebrand them.
Not a bad little performer, especially for the (extremely) low cost.
-Adam
Igor Roshchin wrote:
Scott,
As Adam, I have the 28-70 f2.6-2.8 AT-X Pro in Pentax AF
Nice to have you back Frank.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
frank theriault
Sent: 9. februar 2007 15:13
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT: Cycle couriers
On 2/1/07, David Mann
CORRECTION- are you OR are you not?
William Robb is still avoiding answering
that simple question of course, because
it makes one of his big arguments wrong
no matter which way he answers
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
mike
What Rick said. Good work.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter, these are lovely. It is amazing what a
difference subtle changes make. I would love to see
actual prints someday.
Rick
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: Kodak May Get Out of Film Sooner
Shopper's Drug Mart are quite happy to give a CD with every roll, for
$2.99CDN. They also give an index print (which probably costs them more
than the CD). CD's, especially bought in bulk, aren't
On 2/9/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Knarf!! You're alive!!
What makes you think that?
-frank
;-)
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
its a simple editing error, whats childish about that?
Still waiting for your answer WR,. ( should have read are you OR are you
not?)
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 10:12 AM
To:
-- Original message --
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As an American, I'm not sure you have any say whatsoever regarding taste and
automobile design.
But we still make them. You Brits apparently can't.
Paul
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I have found that I rarely use this lens - probably because I bought
an A 35-105/3.5 at the same time. The lens size is not really to
my liking, so it sits on the shelf gathering dust. It is the A
series 28-135 zoom constant f4 aperture with macro.
It is in excellent condition. No real marks
Do instore labs actually turn a profit or are they there, more or less, to
get people in the store with the hope they purchase other items?
Tom C.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re:
On 9/2/07, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
On 2/9/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Knarf!! You're alive!!
What makes you think that?
-frank
;-)
Like I said, he's a courtin'.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On 2/9/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/9/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/7/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I shot a roll of Kodak Plus-X in the 645 at GFM last June. Scott
Loveless actually souped the stuff for me on site but I didn't get
On 9/2/07, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
As an American, I'm not sure you have any say whatsoever regarding taste
and automobile design.
Now just one damn minute captain (Data, Star Trek TNG).
72 Dodge Charger.Mustang Mach 1T-Birds various...
Beauty is in the eye of the
On 9/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
As an American, I'm not sure you have any say whatsoever regarding
taste and
automobile design.
But we still make them. You Brits apparently can't.
Paul
Ouch!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
I expect them to be available by June, not March-April 2008.
Price point: at the premium end of the scale.
G
On Feb 9, 2007, at 6:35 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Roman,
Your link points toward old news (pre-photokina preview). No
updated more
info since Sep. 2006.
It is likely we'll see the
June '07?
J
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I expect them to be available by June, not March-April 2008.
Price point: at the premium end of the scale.
G
On Feb 9, 2007, at 6:35 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Roman,
Your link points toward old news (pre-photokina preview).
It seems most of what you post is a simple editing error. The rest
is abject stupidity.
G
On Feb 9, 2007, at 8:17 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
its a simple editing error, whats childish about that?
Still waiting for your answer WR,. ( should have read are you OR
are you
not?)
--
PDML
Cheers Mike, appreciated.
John
The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received
Screw you. You never can seem to argue the posts when I
make them, you just throw in these absurd off topic alanders after
the fact to attempt to make all the points made just go away.
I suggest you argue the actual posts and you might have
some credibility here, but of course you cant or couldnt
Yes, June 2007.
I suspect that's what Dario meant but reading it earlier it seemed he
meant a year from now. The usual turn of phrase in English language
is that if you say next March to April, you mean the March to April
*following* the ones coming up; in this case, that would be March-
As I told you before, I don't care what you say.
Why argue posts (... another little editing error? ...) with an idiot?
G
On Feb 9, 2007, at 9:39 AM, whoopee cushion wrote:
[something nonsensical]
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Is this only with the internal flash, or is trailing curtain
sync broken with an external flash such as the AF-540FGZ ?
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 06:08:46PM +1000, jim wrote:
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 22:33:26 +0200, Basil Vizgin wrote:
Page 72 lists what modes trailing curtian can be used in.
Just
Ditto.
Mark Roberts wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=219
I *like* it!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I'd be very interested in the 16-50 and maybe the 60-250 F4.
Dave
On 2/9/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, June 2007.
I suspect that's what Dario meant but reading it earlier it seemed he
meant a year from now. The usual turn of phrase in English language
is that if you say
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
As I told you before, I don't care what you say.
Why argue posts (... another little editing error? ...) with an idiot?
Apparently my theory that Anna Nicole Smith and JCO being the same person
was wrong.
HAR! That was just too easy:-)
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
As an American, I'm not sure you have any say whatsoever regarding
taste and
automobile design.
But
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: Kodak May Get Out of Film Sooner
Do instore labs actually turn a profit or are they there, more or less, to
get people in the store with the hope they purchase other items?
If they are being run right, they don't, just because of the
As I said, why argue with an idiot? Attempt rational discussion?
laughable notion.
JCO Filter switched back on. Bye bye.
G
On Feb 9, 2007, at 10:11 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
[more useless drivel]
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Peter, for some reason I am thinking about Fab Four. Probably the most
well known British notion.
Boris
Peter Lacus wrote:
Hello!
yesterday I finished my first roll of Transcend SD. ;-) It did
accomodate 378 .PEF + 2 .jpg pictures during almost 3 weeks of shooting.
This is my
And don't forget my Belair Convertible :-)
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2438913size=lg
-- Original message --
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/2/07, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
As an American, I'm not sure you have any say
Ok, Paul. Now all you need is somewhat more dramatic lighting and
we'll call you Svengali of the Pentax Remote!
]'-)
G
On Feb 8, 2007, at 6:26 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I have it working now. Works great with the K10D. A test:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5572447
Paul
--
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 04:17:32PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Original message --
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As an American, I'm not sure you have any say whatsoever regarding taste
and
automobile design.
But we still
Well if you cant or wont refute my posts based on the topic, you just
posting
these dumb off topic insult only posts after the fact that dont address
the issues/posts
directly adds nothing to the discussion but wasted time having to
respond to them.
If you really dont care, then just dont post at
Hi!
I think that the 80-320 zoom lens is actually better than my initial
impression mislead me to believe.
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16621full=1
Have your say.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Feb 9, 2007, at 1:51 AM, Thibouille wrote:
... I don't think it is should be considered normal to get free
upgrades
on product. I think that, for the price of a software like PS, you
should at least be sure that if Vista or any other OS comes out,
you'll get any sort of update letting
On 2/7/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I shot a roll of Kodak Plus-X in the 645 at GFM last June. Scott
Loveless actually souped the stuff for me on site but I didn't get
around to scanning them until a couple of weeks ago. No real standouts
amongst them but a few that aren't bad.
thank god, I have had it with you.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 1:26 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
As I said, why argue with an idiot? Attempt
Hi!
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16622full=1
The initial title for this image is Silence, Twenty First Century. I
wonder if you think it fits.
Be brutal and honest, as usual.
Thanks.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
C'mon, it is just about being sure that if the tires Nissan used when
the car came out or phased out you'll be able to buy others which will
let you use your car normally, nothing else.
2007/2/9, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- Original Message -
From: Thibouille
Subject: Re: Trying
Yeah, this was just a flash bounced off the ceiling. Gotta work on that:-)
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, Paul. Now all you need is somewhat more dramatic lighting and
we'll call you Svengali of the Pentax Remote!
]'-)
More than enough reason to steer clear of SP2 even if you have a fully
registered and paid for system. All it takes is being out of business
for one day to remind you why you should hate Microsoft.
Christian wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
What advantage does running a legacy operating
- Original Message -
From: Thibouille
Subject: Re: Trying to buy the LightRoom
C'mon, it is just about being sure that if the tires Nissan used when
the car came out or phased out you'll be able to buy others which will
let you use your car normally, nothing else.
I still wouldn't
On Feb 9, 2007, at 6:08 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
... Every time someone posts something like
this, I start considering getting myself a 645. Here we go
again...
Much as I love 645 (and enjoy the heck out of the loaner Pentax 645
kit...), unless you're willing to go the whole way
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16622full=1
My initial thought was that I'd seen it from you before... Then I found
this http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=15698
I like the composition, Boris, but the BW rendering seems a bit muddy
to me. More
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
I think that the 80-320 zoom lens is actually better than my initial
impression mislead me to believe.
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16621full=1
The colors on the back of the Ibis are gorgeous. I'd crop the
foreground mud out, but what I really like
I use my Shoppers here in town alot.For the most [art they are good,
but depends on who's there. There is one kid working the lab, if i see
them, i leave and come back later when she's gone.
Dave
On 2/9/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Re: Trying to buy the LightRoom
More than enough reason to steer clear of SP2 even if you have a fully
registered and paid for system. All it takes is being out of business
for one day to remind you why you should hate Microsoft.
I
I find the concept interesting, but the crooked vertical seems distracting. It
doesn't really serve a purpose here IMO. And while I'm viewing it on an
imperfect monitor, I think the rendering is a bit muddy and flat. I would
straighten the verticle, brighten it overall and add some more
Hello Boris,
The three open windows really make this scene. I like it overall, but
the tilt bothers me - I would correct that aspect if it were me. I
would also work with curves a bit to lighten the building just a bit.
Certainly worth working it a little.
--
Bruce
Friday, February 9,
On 9/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
And don't forget my Belair Convertible :-)
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2438913size=lg
Beeeautiful.
Bit of a girlie colour though - save it for Grace ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
Most likely.
Micah B. Kleit wrote:
Doing my usual morning browsing through BH, I found a tamron lens
coming soon; don't know if this has come up before:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?
O=SearchA=detailsQ=sku=363813is=REGaddedTroughType=search
There's a MF-AF switch at
On Feb 9, 2007, at 7:03 AM, Micah B. Kleit wrote:
Doing my usual morning browsing through BH, I found a tamron lens
coming soon; don't know if this has come up before:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?
O=SearchA=detailsQ=sku=363813is=REGaddedTroughType=search
There's a
On 9/2/07, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
But for a far smaller market the Brits can offer
the MINI, several Loti, Aston Martin, and even Bentley/Rolls Royce.
Don't forget Land Rover :-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Yes, Christian, this is the same general idea that I am exploring as of
lately.
I see what you're saying, but I wanted it to be silent. Contrasty image
would be much more loud if you see what I mean.
Thanks!
Boris
Christian wrote:
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
You mean my theory is correct?
frank theriault wrote:
On 2/9/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Knarf!! You're alive!!
What makes you think that?
-frank
;-)
--
--
The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
-- Anne Louise Germaine de
It's not their fault exactly, they were stuck with Lucas Electrics...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Original message --
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As an American, I'm not sure you have any say whatsoever regarding taste and
automobile design.
On Feb 9, 2007, at 10:49 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16622full=1
The initial title for this image is Silence, Twenty First Century. I
wonder if you think it fits.
I like the composition, it reminds me of some work by Hiroshi
Sugimoto I was looking at
John Francis wrote:
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 04:17:32PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Original message --
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As an American, I'm not sure you have any say whatsoever regarding taste
and
automobile design.
But we still
You were lucky, you got a tech who knew what they were doing.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Re: Trying to buy the LightRoom
More than enough reason to steer clear of SP2 even if you have a fully
registered and paid for system. All it
William Robb wrote:
More than enough reason to steer clear of SP2 even if you have a fully
registered and paid for system. All it takes is being out of business
for one day to remind you why you should hate Microsoft.
I just replaced my system's OS hard drive.
I installed XP onto the new
Godfrey, in either case tripod would be impossible to use. I had to rely
on Shake Reduction of my K10D.
Consider - I am a programmer. If I were to come in into my office (I sit
in really very open space) with a camera bag *and* a tripod, what my
bosses would think. If and when I get a room
1 - 100 of 237 matches
Mail list logo
