In a message dated 2/26/2007 6:28:58 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is a Carnival joke.
Since I don't know the names of the two girls, and since these were amongst
the first pictures shot with my K10D, I decided they could be Kate and Dee,
so that when pronounced
Yes, Photoshop lightsshadows.
Ciao,
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 8:25 PM
Subject: Re: GESO: Kate'n'Dee
Dario, have you used any dynamic range expansion techniques here???
In a message dated 2/25/2007 12:19:16 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'll say this much about having a PS digital camera to use:
the more I use it, the more I want a DSLR. I'm getting a
greater appreciation of digital photography from seeing what
this camera can do ...
In a message dated 2/24/2007 8:30:20 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK, 2 more panos:
This one from the hotel balcony on Hamilton Island:
http://photography2.skofteland.net:8080/displayimage.php?pos=-69
(you can click the thumbnail to make it bigger - warning 218kb)
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/26 Mon PM 10:32:48 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: The tomb of Jesus
So how can DNA tests prove anything about who persons were might/have been
when you don't have anyone else's DNA to compare it to?
Go to church and take sample of
And one Knarf to post:
And your point is.?
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/27 Tue AM 01:10:20 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: OT: How many List Members Does it Take?
How many mailing list members does it take to change a light bulb?
1 to change the light bulb and to post
In a message dated 2/26/2007 10:40:12 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Again, thank you all for the comments. It's good to think about these
things. Now if only we can get some discussion going. :-)
best
Godfrey
==
- do you like it? what is your immediate
On 26/2/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cameron is a famous con artist.
He may well be, but he has made some bloody good films in his time!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 26/2/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
The last time we visited Cotty we took a long afternoon stroll through
Oxford with Alma while Cotty went off and did whatever the hell it is
he does when he's out doing stuff. This photo is from a courtyard in
one of the colleges (Magdalen,
On 26/2/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
But most
experts say that the third name isn't Jesus anyway. It was
mistranslated.
Now that's just plain silly. Imagine sitting in church and saying ...in
mistranslated's name, Amen.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
On 27/2/07, David Mann, discombobulated, unleashed:
Yes, and that still hasn't fully healed. If I stretch my thumb a
certain way it still hurts a little.
You should be so lucky. If I stretch *anything* a certain way it hurts.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
In a message dated 2/25/2007 8:09:08 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5642056
A shot from Saturdays anuall snowgolf day. We came in second last.
Goal is not to finish last, not first.LOL
About 1/2 way around the course we have
In a message dated 2/27/2007 12:56:27 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now that's just plain silly. Imagine sitting in church and saying ...in
mistranslated's name, Amen.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
=
ROFL.
Marnie aka Doe Good one. Very good one. :-)
Still, my favorite condiment is probably Tabasco Sauce. Goes great on just
about anything.
John
Indeed :)
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Mmm BTW do 67 lenses provide mecanical coupling when used on 645 with
adaptor or one you them like M42 on K body ?
2007/2/27, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
For sports shooters, it's a no brainer. You have to go with Canon.
For a studio pro, who does mainly fashion, the 645 might be
I am thinking of getting the DA 50-200mm. Especially since there is a rebate
going until March 27th.
I know it is what one would call a consumer zoom, so I am wondering
whether it is really worth it. Soft at some focal length, at some aperture?
What is
your opinion of it, if you have it?
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 01:17:30 +, Eric Featherstone wrote
Poppycock! Everyone knows that it's much quicker to change an Edison
Screw bulb than a bayonet fitment bulb.
;-)
Eric.
ROTFLMAO
8)
John
Wasn't this a thread 4 or 5 years ago? :-D
Seriously,
Bong
On 2/27/07, Eric Featherstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Poppycock! Everyone knows that it's much quicker to change an Edison
Screw bulb than a bayonet fitment bulb.
;-)
Eric.
On 27/02/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How many
Both are really nice Christian, very inviting (considering I'm
praying for cold and rain at the moment. I'm sick of summer :-).
Cheers,
Dave
On 2/25/07, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, 2 more panos:
This one from the hotel balcony on Hamilton Island:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:51:13 -0500, J wrote:
Has any one on the list used the Pentax made ring flash on a digital
ist d or other ?
You mean the AF-140C I guess, I have used that on the LX
as well as the Z1, and later the *istD.
It works quite well, allthough sometimes I do need
a bit of
Thanks Russell. I do want to experiment more with different extensions
of the stroboframe and different angles on the flash head. I also have
to try the on-board flash in combination with a solid reflector and
with a soft box attachment. There are a variety of possibilities, and
the best
I''ll take a pic of it sometime soon. Spent last night working on the
computer. Still without success, but I guess I'm narrowing it down.
Paul
On Feb 27, 2007, at 12:25 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
I shall definitely like to see the setup.
Cheers!
Boris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not
...to change a light bulb?
Fifty-one. One who changes the bulb and fifty who, after a quick glance
at the new bulb, say I could have done that!
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
manual cameras and photo galleries - updated
Thanks Marnie.
On Feb 27, 2007, at 2:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This was a nice
conclusion to what
has been a weekend from hell with rampant flu
throughout the house and
even an ambulance trip to the hospital for
91-year-old mom (who is a
back home and okay now). But that's another
Well done. Good job of dealing with the shadows.
Paul
On Feb 27, 2007, at 3:13 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Yes, Photoshop lightsshadows.
Ciao,
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=22219800
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/27 Tue AM 03:10:25 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: One from Cottyland
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Fascinating. The face of the statue has succumbed to age, but it
gives it an eery, mysterious look. I
It's an excellent lens and I use it quite often. I've even used it for
paying jobs, particularly when covering events. It's light and compact
and, for the price, rather well made. Very good.
Paul
On Feb 27, 2007, at 4:29 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am thinking of getting the DA 50-200mm.
It is IMO a good zoom. For the price it is almost given.
As good as the 18-55 is (for its price) it still shows problems at wide angle.
I can't really see a notable problem with the 50-200. Really good.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and
When used on the current 645, using a 67 lens would be akin to using an
M42 lens on the Pentax digitals. I expect that to be the case with the
new camera. However, that's of little concern to studio shooters, who
set the stop and go to work.
Paul
On Feb 27, 2007, at 3:58 AM, Thibouille wrote:
In a message dated 2/27/2007 3:10:22 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's an excellent lens and I use it quite often. I've even used it for
paying jobs, particularly when covering events. It's light and compact
and, for the price, rather well made. Very good.
Paul
Bong Manayon wrote:
Wasn't this a thread 4 or 5 years ago? :-D
The PDML is an environmentally friendly list and believes in recycling.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 2/27/2007 3:13:38 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is IMO a good zoom. For the price it is almost given.
As good as the 18-55 is (for its price) it still shows problems at wide
angle.
I can't really see a notable problem with the 50-200. Really
Thanks, I was just curious, I never owned any Medium format camera.
This is something I will probably do one day, but time as not come yet...
2007/2/27, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
When used on the current 645, using a 67 lens would be akin to using an
M42 lens on the Pentax digitals. I
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/27 Tue AM 09:29:19 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Opinions of DA 50-200mm???
I am thinking of getting the DA 50-200mm. Especially since there is a rebate
going until March 27th.
I know it is what one would call a consumer zoom, so I am
Just as a reading material.
This is a snap shot of market share data published every week by an
association consists of all major camera chains (probably more than 80% of
camera sales in Japan). Pentax's market share has been creeping up every
month ever since K10/100D have been put in market.
I stumbled upon a test chart for k10/100D. There is nothing special about
the test chart itself as it is a classic way of measuring the focus point
and DOF etc. But this one has Pentax log on it, making it look like made by
Pentax :-). I do not think Pentax made this, but it appears that you
Mike thinks this lens may be a bit soft. It's not. At least the one I
own isn't. Not in any way or at any focal length. It does lend itself
to inappropriate use in that it has the FOV of a 300mm lens, yet it
feels like a 70. Here's a pic at 60mm, wide open, 1/60th second with a
bit of flash
Sorry, misread my EXIF data. This was shot with the FA 50/1.4 at f4.
Doh, it better be sharp. But I have examples from the DA 50-200 that
are very close if not equal. I'll look for one later. Gotta go to work
to pay for more toys (and feed six people:-).
Paul
On Feb 27, 2007, at 7:51 AM, Paul
Yes its an annual event. Been going on for about 20 years, but due to
my work travel, i have only been able to attend the last few years.
If snow and cold are your thing, this is a blast.
Dave
On 2/27/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/26/2007 11:37:15 A.M.
David Savage wrote:
At 03:23 PM 27/02/2007, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Go to mass, take some of the bread or wine after
transubstantiation. Voila.
:)
Good one.
And that comes from a Christian! :-)
Sounds more like a Catholic :-)
Isn't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am thinking of getting the DA 50-200mm. [...] I know it is what
one would call a consumer zoom, so I am wondering whether it is
really worth it. Soft at some focal length, at some aperture? What
is your opinion of it, if you have it?
I've been very pleased with
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Feb 27, 2007, at 3:58 AM, Thibouille wrote:
Mmm BTW do 67 lenses provide mecanical coupling when used
on 645 with adaptor or one you them like M42 on K body ?
When used on the current 645, using a 67 lens would be akin to
using an M42 lens on the Pentax digitals.
A
It's supposed to be very good. Many Pentax Consumer zooms are better
than would be expected. Paul Stenquist gets great results with his.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am thinking of getting the DA 50-200mm. Especially since there is a rebate
going until March 27th.
I know it is what one
But will it offer open aperture metering on the 645D?
Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Feb 27, 2007, at 3:58 AM, Thibouille wrote:
Mmm BTW do 67 lenses provide mecanical coupling when used
on 645 with adaptor or one you them like M42 on K body ?
When
Wasn't this a thread 4 or 5 years ago? :-D
The PDML is an environmentally friendly list and believes in recycling.
What a throwaway line!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
P. J. Alling wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Feb 27, 2007, at 3:58 AM, Thibouille wrote:
Mmm BTW do 67 lenses provide mecanical coupling when
used on 645 with adaptor or one you them like M42 on K body ?
When used on the current 645, using a 67 lens would be
Cotty wrote:
Wasn't this a thread 4 or 5 years ago? :-D
The PDML is an environmentally friendly list and believes in recycling.
What a throwaway line!
I love it when you talk trash like that.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I am thinking of getting the DA 50-200mm. Especially since there is a
rebate going until March 27th.
Marnie, here are a couple more that I shot at the camera club outing at the
zoo last weekend. I used the 50~200 for about 80% of my shooting. I think it
is a great example of Pentax glass, and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/24/2007 8:30:20 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK, 2 more panos:
This one from the hotel balcony on Hamilton Island:
http://photography2.skofteland.net:8080/displayimage.php?pos=-69
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/27 Tue PM 12:51:55 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: DA 50-200 Wide Open
Mike thinks this lens may be a bit soft.
I think mine may be.
-
Email sent from
Very good. I keep thinking there's a reason why I don't sel my 67 lenses. Just
think what kind of reach the 67 300/4 will deliver on the 645. (I've read that
it's the same lens as the 645 300/4 with a different mount.) The 55/4 should
make a nice normal. It's excellent glass, and I bet it
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/27 Tue PM 02:48:16 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: How many List Members Does it Take?
Cotty wrote:
Wasn't this a thread 4 or 5 years ago? :-D
The PDML is an environmentally friendly list and
On 2/27/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cotty wrote:
Wasn't this a thread 4 or 5 years ago? :-D
The PDML is an environmentally friendly list and believes in recycling.
What a throwaway line!
I love it when you talk trash like that.
Take it outside.
--
Scott Loveless
Thanks, Pete. I struggled with the composition quite a bit. I wanted
to keep the stem where it is, and using a standard format (8x10 in
this case) meant that the leaf was centered. The correct way for me
to fix this would be to go back to the camera and try it again. BTW,
my wife agrees with
On 2/25/07, Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/25/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/PDMLPESO/photo#5035527265195980162
I really like this, Scott. Very simple. nice line, coming out of the
bottom left corner. Great work.
Thank
Thanks, Rick. Much appreciated. I really enjoyed working on this
one, other than the framing issues., and I think I'll keep working on
this sort of thing for a while.
On 2/25/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott, I really like this one! The way the leaf
undulates is fascinating.
If the adapter provides the linkage then 645D should meter normally IMO.
Pentax stated that 645D is compatible with all 645 lenses and the
DFA55 is announced as being compatible with previous 645 bodies (and
it has an aperture ring).
So it should (hopefully) be OK.
2007/2/27, Mark Roberts [EMAIL
On 2/25/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
Subject: Re: PESO -- Leaf
On 2/25/07, Scott Loveless
I know I'm going
to want that 35mm Macro Limited.
Scott, I think you will find the 35 macro to be too short. I've been using
the 100 macro a lot with
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/PDMLPESO/photo#5035527265195980162
On 2/25/07, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simple and effective. I'm not sure that more depth of field would be an
advantage. It wouldn't be nearly as interesting if everything was in sharp
focus.
On
Thanks, David.
My in-laws in Tamworth have been praying for rain for years now
Their only water supply is a massive rain water tank. They've had to
truck in water to fill it up lately. I think they finally hooked up the
house to the communal well that previously was only used to water
In a message dated 2/27/2007 7:23:49 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marnie, here are a couple more that I shot at the camera club outing at the
zoo last weekend. I used the 50~200 for about 80% of my shooting. I think it
is a great example of Pentax glass, and cheap
In a message dated 2/27/2007 5:40:18 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yep, I'd really like the 60-200 (?) SDM/HSM/SSM/whatever that's coming
leter in the year. I'm not sure I'm going to be able to swing the cost,
though.
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
==
Ditto,
On 2/27/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cotty wrote:
Wasn't this a thread 4 or 5 years ago? :-D
The PDML is an environmentally friendly list and believes in
-- Original message --
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/27 Tue PM 02:48:16 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: How many List Members Does it Take?
Cotty wrote:
In a message dated 2/27/2007 8:39:52 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/27 Tue PM 02:48:16 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: How many List Members Does it Take?
Cotty wrote:
On 2/27/07 11:39 AM, Mark Roberts, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cotty wrote:
Wasn't this a thread 4 or 5 years ago? :-D
The PDML is an environmentally friendly list and believes in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cotty wrote:
Wasn't this a thread 4 or 5 years ago? :-D
The PDML is an environmentally friendly list and believes in
recycling.
What a throwaway line!
I love it when
Scott Loveless wrote:
On 2/27/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cotty wrote:
Wasn't this a thread 4 or 5 years ago? :-D
The PDML is an environmentally friendly
Horatio Cain
:-)
Dave
On 2/26/07, Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/26/07, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you do DNA samples to establish that the bones belonged to Jesus?
What's your reference sample? The Shroud of Turin? Or do you go to
Rosslyn Chapel and swab
Walter Hamler wrote:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/Cormorantweb.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/FoggySunriseweb.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/Jaguarweb.jpg
Went on a shoot yesterday to a nearby wetlands. Shot a few birds, etc.
But all 645 lenses are A lenses, 67 lenses on an adaptor would be
effectively K lenses (Mechanical coupling but no electronic coupling).
It's quite possible the 645D will work just fine with actual 645 lenses
and be stop-down with 67 lenses.
-Adam
Thibouille wrote:
If the adapter provides
I bought one recently as I have been looking for a way to reduce the
size and weight of my complete camera kit. With the rebate it cost me
$166 complete (purchased through Amazon.com from 17th Street Photo,
lowest price that I found available).
About a year ago, I tested the A70-210 Macro,
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Loveless wrote:
On 2/27/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cotty wrote:
Wasn't this a thread 4 or 5 years
Under the circumstances described, those 11 people
would have +ASCENDED+ into puns!
--- Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
11 to descend into puns on light, bulb, and related
terms. [It would
only take one if it were a light bulb, but it would
take two or more
if it is really
In a message dated 2/27/2007 9:54:32 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Loveless wrote:
On 2/27/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:
Hi!
Folks, on Windows Lightroom seems to hold lots of its data in
My Documents\My Pictures\Lightroom directory. Since Windows seems to
monitor access to anything beneath My Documents LR is terribly slow
now on my PC.
How can I instruct LR to put its files elsewhere?
Thanks.
Boris
--
PDML
On Feb 27, 2007, at 9:28 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
... The 67-645 adapter does provide
automatic diaphragm actuation and open aperture metering. At
least according to the Pentax literature. I'd love to buy one
of the
things if I could ever find one.
But will it offer open aperture metering on
In a message dated 2/25/2007 12:19:16 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'll say this much about having a PS digital camera to use:
the more I use it, the more I want a DSLR. I'm getting a
greater appreciation of digital photography from seeing what
this camera can do
On Feb 27, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Folks, on Windows Lightroom seems to hold lots of its data in
My Documents\My Pictures\Lightroom directory. Since Windows seems to
monitor access to anything beneath My Documents LR is terribly slow
now on my PC.
How can I instruct LR to
In a message dated 2/27/2007 10:06:19 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Overall, I would rate it pretty darn good, especially for the price.
G
===
Wow, what a report. Yes I was wondering how it compared to the A 70-210.
Thanks, Godfrey, for such a fulsome
I'm afraid I can't help you Boris. But I really hope some can.
This is very interesting. I've had big performance problems myself after
installing v1.0.
If you are right about this, it may be the solution of my problems too.
It would also solve another issue for me. Storing the db files on my
Your the man G :-)
You may have saved me a lot of trouble here (and the money for a dedicated
machine). This may be the solution for my problems too. I'll check and
report back.
Tim Typo
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Boris, Lightroom creates a lot of files *.DNG or *.PEF and *.NOINDEX files
in a special library somewhere in your computer.
These exists independant of where you stored the original *.DNG files or the
resulting jpeg's or Tiff's.
So, your computer will quickly get filled up with all these files.
Thanks Boris!
I like you honest comments a lot.
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Boris Liberman
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 6:26 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO:Reading friends
Markus, I think that
I agree with you comment Tim and thanks for looking.
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Tim Osleby
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 5:13 PM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: PESO:Reading friends
Funny. The girl at the right
Hi Pentaxians
I do not find the time to read all the messages on the PDML but take a lot
of photographs nearly every day.
You would not believe that the K10D was not available in Switzerland until
today!
So, finally I can order one next week for my panorama calendar project :-)
Does anyone use the
Although you've already seen quite a few examples, I did promise to follow up
on this morning's faux DA 50-200 shot with some genuine articles. Here are a
few from my photo.net page. I think you've probably seen that you can't go too
wrong with this lens.
Beautiful city, nice collage. It looks very professional.
I don't use the DA 21 (yet), but Godders is very fond of it, and I'm sure he'll
respond. I think Wheatfield has one as well.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Pentaxians
Thanks, Godfrey. It did the trick.
Boris
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Feb 27, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Folks, on Windows Lightroom seems to hold lots of its data in
My Documents\My Pictures\Lightroom directory. Since Windows seems to
monitor access to anything beneath My
On Feb 27, 2007, at 11:08 AM, Markus Maurer wrote:
So, finally I can order one next week for my panorama calendar
project :-)
Does anyone use the DA 21mm lens with it?
Would you recommend it?
Yes, very much. A great lens.
In between, a collage of Zurich photos for a greeting card. All
Nice postcard, makes me miss Zürich...
Norm
Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi Pentaxians
I do not find the time to read all the messages on the PDML but take a lot
of photographs nearly every day.
You would not believe that the K10D was not available in Switzerland until
today!
So, finally I can
Hi!
I think I could give it a title like this: The Screen Shot...
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16846full=1
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
You're welcome, Tim.
Performance on Windows XP/PC hardware is often also compromised by
the lack of the SSE2 instruction set, and at least one person on this
photo.net thread (last posting) reported a big improvement in
performance when he upped his RAM from 1G to 2G:
Jens,
Lightroom only creates copies of the image source files if you import
using the copy or move options. It does not make copies at all if
you use the reference files in their existing location option. When
it does make a copy, it makes only ONE copy unless you set the option
to backup
I have the 50-200DA and the FA 70-200, that was recently repaired from
the fall i had this fall:-)
I preferr the 70-200, just a tad more than the 50200.
Seems everso slightly better for focusing in dimmer light.
Although i have not printed a picture from either lrns, the 70-200
looks, a tad
On 2/27/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/26/2007 9:53:43 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
here is a cropped slightly, and plus a half stop version...
http://www.avocadohead.com/piclinks/spare2.html
the first crop:
Adorama (www.adorama.com) is offering the Sandisk Extreme III 2 gig SD card for
$79.95. The manufacturer has a $20 rebate in place, which is referenced on the
adorama site. It's a bargain at $59.95. (I think. Although with prices of
memory dropping every day, it's hard to be sure:-).
Paul
--
All 645 lenses are A lenses and are electronically identical to to the
Pentax Ka lens mount. There is no 645 equivalent to a K lens but I
would expect that the 67 lenses would fill that niche. Remember Ka
lenses are supported by all Pentax K DSLRs but using the aperture ring
for full
From today's Writer's Almanac:
It was on this day in 1860 that the photographer Mathew Brady took the first
of several portraits of Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln was just a presidential
hopeful at the time, and he stopped by Mathew Brady's portrait gallery in
New York City on his way to give an
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo
