There is a very convenient function in the tinyURL site: 'make toolbar button'.
So you have a button in your browser, you just click it when you are in the
long URL page and you got the tiny url. No need to cut and paste.
- Mensaje original
De: Bill Sawyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para:
On 27/2/07, Jack Davis, discombobulated, unleashed:
What's the clipboard?
Magic.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 21:07:37 -0500, Beaker wrote:
something like it with a Pentax digital SLR? It looks like the pins
on the flash will line up with contacts on the camera. Too much to
I am sure I have read somewhere that the pins don't line up, tho they are close
enough to maybe make
I just ordered my copy of LR from our local Adobe reseller. Just out
of curiosity, I am asked about how much time of support do I get. The
answer was 3 months, but we're there later on, said the
representative. Is that the same in your country?
It should arrive tomorrow to my office in Tel
Boris Liberman wrote:
Thanks... Uhmmm... Erhmmm... Sorry.
Marnie, are you aware that you have this rather strange promo from AOL
attached to your messages? It is cited below...
BRBRBR**BR AOL now offers free
email to everyone. Find out more about
P. J. Alling wrote:
Adventures in BW conversion. Sometimes you have to throw away the rule
book. I decided to try converting this photo, (posted a few months
ago), to BW. It had an interesting foreground and very nice dramatic
clouds.
Tom C wrote:
An abstract of nature. It's a frozen over section of More's Creek. The
picture was taken from (guessing) 175 feet above the surface.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5654453
That's very cool, Tom. Very cool
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Taken in Denali National Park, Alaska during a fall snowstorm with *ist D,
600mm f4.0 FA 1.4X-L convertor on Gitzo 1548 tripod with Kirk King Cobra
head.
1/800 @ f5.0.
Comments appreciated
Hi Godders,
I'm still on 10.3.9. Can't get the system software to install. I'm
going to call that support number you gave me today.
In addition to Premium Presentation Matte and Presentation Matte I
see Ultra Premium Presentation Matte. I might assume that was a
pseudonym for Velvet Fine Art,
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/28 Wed AM 02:37:28 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Da Bear
Yes I would not want to meet up with this gal in the woods. You can tell
it's a she by the look on her face.
Tom C.
Then the title should be Ma Bear?
From:
Hello,
I'd like to buy these lenses. Dose anybody have these lenses? How are
they on digital? As for the first one I saw some photos and they are
just ok, as for the second one I don't hear too much. These lenses are
rather cheep today.
May be somebody can share the links to the photos by
I tried a hot shoe extension cord made for Nikon on my K10D. The pins
appeared to be the same, but they didn't actually make contact.
Wouldn't work.
Paul
On Feb 28, 2007, at 4:12 AM, jim wrote:
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 21:07:37 -0500, Beaker wrote:
something like it with a Pentax digital SLR? It
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to buy these lenses. Dose anybody have these lenses? How are
they on digital? As for the first one I saw some photos and they are
just ok, as for the second one I don't hear too much. These lenses are
rather cheep today.
May be somebody can
Hi Dao,
I've found that the M200/4 works well on digital, although I rarely use
it any more. Here's a couple:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2686457
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2686452
I've never used the M135/3.5 on digital, but I found it good on film. I
always
I have both, and they are for sale. Send me an email off list.
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: Another lens story.
Interesting ... CF and SD, MS Duo. Never seen that one before. Looks
nice and compact too. I'll bookmark it.
Oh yeah: does it handle SDHC?
It is very compact, 65mm square x 20mm thick, and it does handle
Hello Christian,
Wednesday, February 28, 2007, 3:58:29 PM, you wrote:
C The 200/4 is a fine lens. I had both the M and A versions (they were so
C similar I believe the glass and build were the same, only the addition
C of the A setting set them apart). I used the 200 with a reversed 50mm
C in
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hamilton
Subject: Re: OT: Photographing Lincoln
On 2/27/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't chase you across that parking lot in Nakusp because I wanted to
buy
you a beer, I was chasing you away.
Nakusp is my summer stomping
You suck, Ken, go away. Ok, that's just the jealousy of the 600/4.
Nice shot. Looks like he was smelling you...
Is that why the look of displeasure... er, or is it pleasure? :-)
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Yes, it's not as good. but it's so retro!
Not that much work actually. The magic wand sometimes really is magic.
Everything is a learning experience.
Christian wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
Adventures in BW conversion. Sometimes you have to throw away the rule
book. I decided to try
On 2/27/07, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Taken in Denali National Park, Alaska during a fall snowstorm with *ist D,
600mm f4.0 FA 1.4X-L convertor on Gitzo 1548 tripod with Kirk King Cobra
head.
1/800 @ f5.0.
http://www.adorama.com/PX1650AFD.html $750
http://www.adorama.com/PX50135AFD.html $830
Some of you may really like this.
--
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 08:58:29 -0500, Christian wrote
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to buy these lenses. Dose anybody have these lenses? How are
they on digital? As for the first one I saw some photos and they are
just ok, as for the second one I don't hear too much. These
I got a question.
I tend to use the Ilford papers and the Costco Glossy 95% of the time, but
have used others like the Museo. I have seldom had a problem getting a good
print, but I always use the settings to make the software set the print
requirements, not the printer, other than setting a
Sitting in my hotel room this morning, writing the last bit of the
mid-term exam for one of my courses, I flipped on the televison to
check on the weather forecast and stumbled upon a documentary about
photographer Gordon Parks. I've seen and liked a lot of his work but
had little idea about
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank You for Your responce.
Could You please show some photos by the lense?
Sorry, I don't have any online right now.
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
The A is a different optical formula than the M.
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/primes/tele/A200f4.html
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/primes/tele/M200f4.html
The M has a slightly better reputation over all for image quality, but
that may just be due to a more elements = better
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless
Subject: Re: OT: Photographing Lincoln
We go for the Garlic Festival.
Is that what they're calling it now?
http://www.kootenayrockies.com/events/eventsdetail.html?id=471
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to buy these lenses. Dose anybody have these lenses? How are
they on digital?
I have them both. Used them with an istDS and now with the K10D and I'm
quite happy with them.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private
Thanks, Ken. I've not used this viewer much before. Did it let you
cycle through all five images?
-P
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Nicely done, a cute image.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Paul Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: GESO - Cal's First Birthday
A series
On 2/28/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We go for the Garlic Festival.
Is that what they're calling it now?
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
Shoot more film!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I have a M 200/4. I haven't used much on digital, but it seems to be
alright on digital. It's a nice light lens. I don't use it as much as
it deserves, but I didn't spend a lot of money on it either.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to buy these lenses. Dose anybody have these
Hello Walter,
WH I have both, and they are for sale. Send me an email off list.
I'm trying to send e-mail for You, but all of them returned to me
with the same error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP error from remote mail server after initial connection:
host mx01.mail.bellsouth.net
All I'm trying to do is to get the print to end up looking as close as
possible to what I see on the screen.
At the moment I'm pretty damn close, using Epson papers profiles (I
also let PS handle colour management). I think the only thing that I
could do to improve the process is to start making
Yes, I noticed that too.
I'm going to call Sandisk today and see if they can tell me whether
my half-year-old 12-in-1 is SDHC compatible. I hope so, it would save
me $20, but it isn't a big deal.
So far, 2G cards have been doing the job just fine for my needs but
it would be nice to have
what about the K/200/4 version? (sorry I havent
done any comparisons, I no longer have any
more m versions of that one). Based on the fact
that the K200 is the same as the superb smct version,
I'd bet its at least as good as the others..
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you're getting the print results you want, don't change anything. :-)
Using a color managed workflow is a means to obtain production
consistency. It is also a means by which you can take files from one
system and bring them to another while maintaining color balance
fidelity.
I was
On Feb 28, 2007, at 6:09 AM, William Robb wrote:
Interesting ... CF and SD, MS Duo. Never seen that one before. Looks
nice and compact too. I'll bookmark it.
Oh yeah: does it handle SDHC?
It is very compact, 65mm square x 20mm thick, and it does handle SDHC
according to the logos on the
What I've found, after trying three sets of sample profiles made by
highly respected color management experts is that the Epson profiles
for Epson Enhanced Matte and Epson Velvet Fine Art supplied with the
R2400 are about as good as I can get. So I stick with the Epson
profiles and don't
Thanks Godders. Some of the folks in our camera club insist that you have to
use profiles to get a good print. When I show them my results, they just
claim I am lucky!
I have never done any type of production printing. I think if I had the need
to, I would get a lab to print to the RA4 paper
I have one of the Lowepro cases.
Keep empty cards in the right side, full cards on the left.
Whenever a cards is full, I also slide the Write Protection switch on
after removing it from the camea. It doesn't get switched off until
the pictures are safely transferred to PC or CD.
dk
On 2/28/07,
- Original Message -
From: Walter Hamler
Subject: Velvet Fine Art on the R2400?
Thanks Godders. Some of the folks in our camera club insist that you have
to
use profiles to get a good print. When I show them my results, they just
claim I am lucky!
If you are doing any fiddling
Since we were talking about this adapter yesterday, I got curious and
watched an auction for one being auctioned on Ebay. It just closed at
$158 ... anyone here the winner?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemih=016sspagename=STRK%
3AMEWA%3AITviewitem=item=260090236592rd=1rd=1
G
Several years ago I picked up a 6 in 1 version by Scan Disk, that handles
MS, SD/MMC, CF I II and SM, still working fine. Got it free in combination
with one of their memory cards.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Another lens
I bought both for about $100 but have really only used the 135mm.
Free hand, with SR on the K10D.
Here are a few examples, for what they are worth -
http://mac.tidings.nu/PinkyPentax/Images/Pentax/DSLR/K10D/Apples.jpg
- 1/20 sec
William Robb wrote:
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Since we were talking about this adapter yesterday, I got curious and
watched an auction for one being auctioned on Ebay. It just closed at
$158 ... anyone here the winner?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemih=016sspagename=STRK%
Excellent, Ken. You've been holding out on us. I figured we had seen
the best of the Denali pics, but this one is superb. I hope you were in
a truck. 600 or not, that's way too close:-).
Paul
On Feb 28, 2007, at 9:34 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
On 2/27/07, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:31:22 -0500, J. C. O'Connell wrote
what about the K/200/4 version? (sorry I havent
done any comparisons, I no longer have any
more m versions of that one). Based on the fact
that the K200 is the same as the superb smct version,
I'd bet its at least as good as the
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Pentax 6x7 to 645 adapter ...
Since we were talking about this adapter yesterday, I got curious and
watched an auction for one being auctioned on Ebay. It just closed at
$158 ... anyone here the winner?
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Taken in Denali National Park, Alaska during a fall snowstorm with *ist D,
600mm f4.0 FA 1.4X-L convertor on Gitzo 1548 tripod with Kirk King Cobra
head.
1/800 @ f5.0.
Comments appreciated
Kenneth Waller
Jealousy is a
Profiles generally offer some improvement over other methods of
printing that tend to be more hit and miss. I once used ColorSynch
workflow, and I was completely happy with my results, but Godders
talked me into printing with the profiles and color management turned
off. I have to say the
I have about a 99% success rate getting prints to my liking off of three
different Epson printers.
The prints will never match the screen exactly, but I find the buyers like
what I'm printing very much.
I only use Epson inks papers and have a spyder calibrated monitor.
I'm still amazed that I
Did it let you cycle through all five images?
Yes very quickly.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Paul Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: GESO - Cal's First Birthday
Thanks, Ken. I've not used this viewer much before. Did it let you
cycle through all five images?
On Feb 28, 2007, at 1:26 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
... By the way I was asked to delete whatever I have now on my
computer
and re-install it from the disk that they will give to me... Peculiar,
me thinks.
Peculiar, yes. I wonder why.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Okay, I woke up early and have some time this morning...
I operate a small home-based business that I started over two years ago. I
am getting into it more and more. It's sort of part-time, but even though it
is, it does mean that I am somewhat a working stiff and my time is limited
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 04:27:56PM +0200, Boris Liberman wrote:
http://www.adorama.com/PX1650AFD.html $750
http://www.adorama.com/PX50135AFD.html $830
Some of you may really like this.
Indeed. And the (current) official release date is May 15th,
which just happens to be my birthday!
--
Okay, that tears it. I am unsubscribing now.
Sorry about that, but I cannot show my face around here now.
I was very tired, and I made a big, big mistake.
Marnie aka Doe A BIG mistake.
BRBRBR**BR AOL now offers free
email to everyone. Find out more
Thanks Godfrey, Walt, Tom C,Bruce, P.J. Marnie, William, Jack, Rick,
Christian, Mike, Walter, Scott, Paul Cory for taking the time to look
comment.
Just for info - this was one of 2000 images shot in the park over a 10 day
period. We'd leave camp before daylight normally return just after
You made no mistake. I enjoyed both your critique and your observations
on debate and discussion. Nothing to be ashamed of. Quite the contrary.
It was well done.
Don't go.
Paul
On Feb 28, 2007, at 12:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, that tears it. I am unsubscribing now.
Sorry about
I didn't chase you across that parking lot in Nakusp because I wanted to
buy
you a beer, I was chasing you away.
William Robb
--
LOL.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I agree with Paul if I were Godfry I'd be pleased someone took the time to
so intelligently state their position on images of mine.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PAW 2007 - 07, 08, Soft Lights - GDG (Critique - off list)
You
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip some stuff about critiques or whatever
Take Care, Later, Marnie aka Doe ;-)
(One more quick proof of the last 1/4th then off. Up to an hour and a half
now. -- Very quick proof done, now send it off and hope I don't really annoy
the heck out of Godfrey
This was my fault, Marnie. It was way too long to get through the gate,
so I glanced over it and decided it would be good to keep it whole. I
never noticed the Off-list part in the subject line.
I shouldn't have approved it.
But, it's good to know I am getting more able to write complete,
Bring it to GFM, and we'll give it the respect it deserves.
vbg
Dave
On 2/27/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Worthy of framing, eh?
G
On Feb 27, 2007, at 8:05 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
It wasn't a bad one. It was the lens story post of an hour ago or
so.
Perhaps it
You should have smelled his breath after that Garlic-infused ale... we were
looking for the dogs for hours.
Tom C.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Photographing Lincoln
Date: Wed,
Great shot Ken.
The background seem sto have a painted feel to it.
Hummm, school bus eh. Liz is a bus driver. Wonder if she'll lend the bus out.:-)
Dave
On 2/28/07, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Godfrey, Walt, Tom C,Bruce, P.J. Marnie, William, Jack, Rick,
Christian, Mike,
On the Pentax usa website it is mentioned that the two new weather sealed
lenses (smc PENTAX-DA* 16-50mm F2.8 ED AL[IF]SDM and smc PENTAX-DA*
50-135mm F2.8 ED [IF]SDM) have built-in super sonic focusing motors.
But there's no mentioneing of what SDM stands for.
This has probably been mentioned
Okay, I came back. Bruce said it wasn't that bad. He also told me some of
what some of you said. Thanks.
I just feel a little overdisclosed and overexposed right now. :-} (That's
an embarrassed grin.)
So I'll probably be a bit meek and humble and quiet for a while.
Marnie aka Doe :-}
I don't think I want to watch Dave give it the respect it deserves...
David J Brooks wrote:
Bring it to GFM, and we'll give it the respect it deserves.
vbg
Dave
On 2/27/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Worthy of framing, eh?
G
On Feb 27, 2007, at 8:05 PM, Paul
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 06:47:51PM +0100, Jens Bladt wrote:
On the Pentax usa website it is mentioned that the two new weather sealed
lenses (smc PENTAX-DA* 16-50mm F2.8 ED AL[IF]SDM and smc PENTAX-DA*
50-135mm F2.8 ED [IF]SDM) have built-in super sonic focusing motors.
But there's no
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: SDM lenses
On the Pentax usa website it is mentioned that the two new weather sealed
lenses (smc PENTAX-DA* 16-50mm F2.8 ED AL[IF]SDM and smc PENTAX-DA*
50-135mm F2.8 ED [IF]SDM) have built-in super sonic focusing motors.
But
Thanks Bruce, Jack, Bill, Ken, Godfrey, Christian, John.
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Winter Thaw
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:10:49 -0800 (PST)
The composition took
On Feb 28, 2007, at 9:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, I came back. ...
I'm glad ...
So I'll probably be a bit meek and humble and quiet for a while.
Marnie aka Doe :-} But you know that won't last long.
... and for that too. Wouldn't be right otherwise. :-)
I appreciate your
I thought you said you weren't going to post for awhile grin.
--
Bruce
Thanks. I wasn't because I thought I'd run out of steam. But on the way to
work yesterday morning...
Tom C.
Tuesday, February 27, 2007, 6:36:20 PM, you wrote:
TC An abstract of nature. It's a frozen over section of
Hey,
Not changing the To: address when sending a message offlist is very easy to
do. I'm sure many of us smiled because we have been there.
Tom C.
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re:
Not to toot my own horn, but today is my birthday AND I got my bonus
payout as well... so instead of doing something sensible like investing
it, I bought myself a major gift:
OT because it does not have a Pentax badge on it
http://tinyurl.com/2yvktl
Should arrive in 3 or 4 days.
Christian wrote:
Not to toot my own horn, but today is my birthday AND I got my bonus
payout as well... so instead of doing something sensible like investing
it, I bought myself a major gift:
OT because it does not have a Pentax badge on it
http://tinyurl.com/2yvktl
Should arrive in 3
Happy Birthday! Very woo-hoo indeed!
--
Bruce
Wednesday, February 28, 2007, 11:34:24 AM, you wrote:
C Not to toot my own horn, but today is my birthday AND I got my bonus
C payout as well... so instead of doing something sensible like investing
C it, I bought myself a major gift:
C OT
Two words - You suck!
Tom C.
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: OT - Happy Birthday to me major enablement
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:34:24 -0500
Not to toot my own horn, but today is my
On 2/28/07, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not to toot my own horn, but today is my birthday AND I got my bonus
payout as well... so instead of doing something sensible like investing
it, I bought myself a major gift:
OT because it does not have a Pentax badge on it
I have a M 4/200mm as well. I have tested it against some fine lenses, like
the FA* 2.8/80-200mm
It's better than I thought it would be:
http://jensbladt.dk/Test/images/200mm56-small/0830-PM-200-56.jpg
http://jensbladt.dk/Test/images/200mm56-small/1197-PTX-200mm-F56.jpg
Regards
Jens Bladt
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: OT: Photographing Lincoln
You should have smelled his breath after that Garlic-infused ale... we
were
looking for the dogs for hours.
Hell, we were looking for your kid for hours.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Now that's a nice major gift ...
Long teles is definitely Canon's forte. Good luck with it!
G
On Feb 28, 2007, at 11:34 AM, Christian wrote:
Not to toot my own horn, but today is my birthday AND I got my bonus
payout as well... so instead of doing something sensible like
investing
it, I
Quite interesting. I believe it will not be as popuklar here as frisbee
golf. The time of year with snow is relatively short.
http://frisbee.dk/sw991.asp
Regards
Jens Bladt
Latest photographs: http://flickr.com/photos/bladt/
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype:
I promise we won't take it off trhe mountain.:-)
Dave
On 2/28/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think I want to watch Dave give it the respect it deserves...
David J Brooks wrote:
Bring it to GFM, and we'll give it the respect it deserves.
vbg
Dave
On 2/27/07,
Great news Christian. I'm sure you'll put it to good use.
Now all you need is a Sherpa to carry it, a tripod head!
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT - Happy Birthday to me major enablement
Not to toot my own horn, but today is my
Very nice colourscomposition.
On 2/26/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(SNIP)
BTW, I'm moving to larger standard display sizes. This one is square
at 624x624 pixels ... I'd like to know if anyone has difficulty with
this size photo, particularly in the vertical dimension. Can
On 2/28/07, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OT because it does not have a Pentax badge on it
http://tinyurl.com/2yvktl
Does that come with a sherpa to carry it?
-Mat
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
He takes after hs mother.
Tom C.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Photographing Lincoln
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:55:53 -0600
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject:
Congratulations! That's extreme enablement.
Paul
On Feb 28, 2007, at 2:34 PM, Christian wrote:
Not to toot my own horn, but today is my birthday AND I got my bonus
payout as well... so instead of doing something sensible like
investing
it, I bought myself a major gift:
OT because it does
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Great news Christian. I'm sure you'll put it to good use.
Now all you need is a Sherpa to carry it, a tripod head!
h that's the second sherpa comment. Cesar? where are you?
Seriously, the lens is so frigging expensive that I could not buy the
wimberley or kirk
William,
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/flare70.html
It's not that good a picture...
As an aside:
The picture in the background was one I shot on my Dad's OM-1 just before I
bought my LX.
I think your new lens was just envious from seeing a picture made using
a competitor hanging
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: OT: Photographing Lincoln
He takes after hs mother.
She wasn't there?
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Jens,
I have a M 4/200mm as well. I have tested it against some fine lenses, like
the FA* 2.8/80-200mm
It's better than I thought it would be:
http://jensbladt.dk/Test/images/200mm56-small/0830-PM-200-56.jpg
http://jensbladt.dk/Test/images/200mm56-small/1197-PTX-200mm-F56.jpg
wow, that's
John,
I've not compared the K 200/4 to the M 200/4 despite owning the K. However a
couple of years back I tested M 200/4, A 200/4, A 70-210/4 and FA 80-320 (at
200mm)against each other on film, the M 200/4 appeared sharpest with best
definition followed by a close call between A 70-210/4
John,
Indeed. And the (current) official release date is May 15th,
which just happens to be my birthday!
cool, I'm just wondering how they knew it? ;-)
Cheers,
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Hi Mike,
Tigerdirect.ca has the Transcend 150x 4GB cards that all the folks in
the US rave about... (NewEgg.com doesn't ship to Canada, sadly).
$66.99 for 4GB of 150x memory? Hell yeah. I could order 3 and have
enough memory for 6 months! :)
not just in the US. ;-) They are IMHO not true
Tom,
An abstract of nature. It's a frozen over section of More's Creek. The
picture was taken from (guessing) 175 feet above the surface.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5654453
your place in PDML's Hall of Fame is ready. :-)
Cheers,
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Tom,
An abstract of nature. It's a frozen over section of More's Creek. The
picture was taken from (guessing) 175 feet above the surface.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5654453
your place in PDML's Hall of Fame is ready. :-)
Cheers,
Peter
--
LOL. Thanks Peter.
I might try out the sidekick which I hear is good for the 500mm and is half
the cost of the gimbal heads.
I have the Kirk King Cobra have no issue with it.
Check out a recent addition - the Jobo. Looks simple I believe is less
costly that the full blown Wimberly Kirk.
Now what about the
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
