Just a quick reality check.
Would any of you lot use the popup-flash when shooting something like this:
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=kongen2
or even this
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=kongen
???
(Disclaimer: These are pictures that are only nearly there, as you can
probably
David Mann wrote:
On Mar 2, 2007, at 12:50 PM, Bong Manayon wrote:
Just curious, has anyone accidentally detached their lens from
the body?
I once accidentally detached a 400mm f/4 lens from a Pentax 6x7. The
shop's lens fell straight down into a box full of nice, soft camera
bags
The only comment I read on this comparison lead me to beleive they are
both comparable.
Pretty much the same kind of rendering. This is only from readings
'cos I defenitely can't afford any of those but what you wrote
surprise me very much.
Just my 2 cents ...
2007/3/2, J and K Messervy [EMAIL
No unless you do something stupid or do something else at the same
time I have a hard time to imagine how one could drop a K lens.
Maybe if I do it on purpose, I will try this afternoon with a couple
of lemons without any value and report back.
2007/3/2, Bong Manayon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just
From: cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/03/02 Fri AM 12:17:43 GMT
To: Pdml@pdml.net pdml@pdml.net
Subject: older flashes with K10, Pentax's response
After reading some posts a while back about the possibility of wrecking the
K10's flash circuit by using older flash units, I have
From: Gianfranco Irlanda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/03/02 Fri AM 12:43:38 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: March PUG IS UP
ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] kindly wrote:
Many fine shots, and, yeah, Goal Keeper is a real keeper as
many
pointed out
Ditto.
since there are so
Hello Bong,
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 07:50:39 +0800, Bong Manayon wrote:
Just curious, has anyone accidentally detached their lens from the body?
I ask that because I am in middle of a debate on the merits of the
K-mount which is opposite to the layout of the
Canon/Nikon/Olympus/Sony(KM) mounts. To
I'm not saying you cant use other specialty ranges but where are you
going to get a good 18-80mm to go with your 80-200? ( Cover
main range of 18-135mm for APS just like the standard 28-200mm
FullFrame f.l. range)?
If you go with a 80-200mm, then you are going to need three lenses to do
that, not
Beaker wrote:
Hi-
Anyone have a favorite pocketable digital camera? It may be time to
look for one...
Thanks
Mike Beacom
Pentax' Optio series.
I have the S4 and the S5i. There is also an S6 version.
The numerals indicate megapixel size, but they all function very well.
You may
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 3/1/2007 7:20:37 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was talking in the sense that we use a nomenclature that refers to
things as B.C. and A.D, with the implicit recognition that our counting
of years, forwards or backwards
IMO Auto modes - especially programmet AE - never worked well with Pentax
cameras and a flash.
The camera will just set the shutter speed and aperture as if there was no
flash attatched!
(Except of course for speed that will exeed the max sync speed (1/180 fro
the K10D)
The result is often using
Hi!
mike wilson wrote:
A pity that it is utter twaddle. My assumtion from those statements
is that the older flashes will not do the automatically set shutter
speed and give 'ready' indication in the viewfinder. What Pentax
calls dedication. If the body will trigger the flash in manual
Buy a nice Nokia or Samsung phone for this!
Or - if you really ant a nice camera - perhaps a Pentax Optio A20 - 10Mp
and Shake Reduction!
How about that?
Regards
Jens Bladt
Latest photographs: http://flickr.com/photos/bladt/
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype:
cbwaters wrote:
The AF220T and AF280T flashes can definitely be used on the new K10D,
however it will only work in manual mode.
Now you know.
Not true, body!
Any dedicated flash can be used in ANY mode on the K10D. (Except they don't
do TTL with the K10D - no flash does TTL on K10D!).
There's
BTW:
The AF500FGZ features both TTL and P-TTL, so it can be used successfully
(TTL or P-TTL) with almost any Pentax SLR camera - since 1983 (Super A) with
a few exceptions -like P30, P50, ...
I'm gonna get me one of those soon - I whish :-)
Regards
Jens Bladt
Latest photographs:
Nope.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Toralf Lund
Subject: On other photographers...
Just a quick reality check.
Would any of you lot use the popup-flash when shooting something like
this:
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=kongen2
or even this
Ditto.
Cheers,
Dave
On 3/2/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Toralf Lund
Subject: On other photographers...
Just a quick reality check.
Would any of you lot use the popup-flash when shooting something like
this:
No, I never use it anyway. The lenses are often too nosy.
Regards
Jens Bladt
Latest photographs: http://flickr.com/photos/bladt/
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some brief PUG comments from me...
Vase - Peter McIntosh
I very rarely shoot very ordinary things. But this is great, the reflection
makes it an intriguing abstract. Makes me rethink shooting ordinary things.
Thanks, Marnie!
Ciao,
Peter in Sydney
--
PDML
Nope.
I thought so.
But what if you were standing a bit closer to the building (or palace,
I should perhaps say) in the first picture - say, next to that ice
sculpture lit up in blue - and photographing some people up on the
balcony (as it's usually called, although it's been argued that
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/03/02 Fri AM 10:12:21 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: older flashes with K10, Pentax's response
Hi!
mike wilson wrote:
A pity that it is utter twaddle. My assumtion from those statements
is that the
I'm not saying you cant use other specialty ranges but where are you going
to get a good 18-80mm to go with your 80-200?
Sigma makes a 17~70 that is quite nice according to the reviews. I doubt
that it covers FF at the short end but might at the longer portion. That
would be important to
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 04:58:08 -0500, J. C. O'Connell wrote
I'm not saying you cant use other specialty ranges but where are you
going to get a good 18-80mm to go with your 80-200? ( Cover
main range of 18-135mm for APS just like the standard 28-200mm
FullFrame f.l. range)?
If you go with a
On 3/02/07 7:56 AM, Toralf Lund, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But what if you were standing a bit closer to the building (or palace,
I should perhaps say) in the first picture - say, next to that ice
sculpture lit up in blue - and photographing some people up on the
balcony (as it's usually
The AF540FGZ does both TTL and P-TTL, the AF500 does not do P-TTL or
analog TTL (the latter I'm not 100% sure of).
-Adam
Jens Bladt wrote:
BTW:
The AF500FGZ features both TTL and P-TTL, so it can be used successfully
(TTL or P-TTL) with almost any Pentax SLR camera - since 1983 (Super A)
Thanks Stan. I like your perspective on this:-).
Paul
On Mar 1, 2007, at 10:57 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
You know, that is quite impressive. Your worst shot, a throw away
that didn't fit the theme (you thought), is still good enough to be
used. Well done.
stan
On Mar 1, 2007, at 12:05 PM,
In a message dated 3/2/2007 2:22:05 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Very non-PC? From that very Wikipedia posting:
Some criticize Common Era notation as a euphemism that does not alter
the pivotal year one still centering on the life of Jesus. Many others
criticize
I've seen PBase sample photos of SMCP 70mm f2.4 Limited. Very nice.
Can't find in-depth reviews. Any information?
Thank you.
--
new photos ever so often... http://roman.blakout.net/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Absolutely not. On the first, the popup (or any flash) would create a
white hole in the first few rows of the crowd. With the second shot, it
would do nothing save perhaps create an unpleasant glow if there is
mist or smoke in the air.
Paul
On Mar 2, 2007, at 6:44 AM, David Savage wrote:
Beaker wrote:
Hi-
Anyone have a favorite pocketable digital camera? It may be time to
look for one...
Thanks
Mike Beacom
Add another vote for the original Optio S altoids cam. It's great to
bring anywhere because it is so slim.
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=
A*O*L hoovers. They stick this promo on the bottom of my email without even
asking me and if you do use free AOL email there are ads and ads and ads.
Correct. I think it cannot be used with any camera earlier then about 1990
(can't be bothered to look it up...) other than in full belt manual.
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/03/02 Fri PM 01:20:27 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: older flashes with
K.Takeshita wrote:
Despite the argument that pop-ups are useless and pro-gears
should not have them etc, I think it's useful if you know when to
use it.
You bet. When hiking trails with a full pack of camping gear, I usually
don't pack a flash as well :)
...or if I do it's often to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wish I could remember where and when I found something that used
another notation. It may have been common era or not. It
was an international group,
I think it's pretty common in Europe these days.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Mark Roberts wrote:
K.Takeshita wrote:
Despite the argument that pop-ups are useless and pro-gears
should not have them etc, I think it's useful if you know when to
use it.
You bet. When hiking trails with a full pack of camping gear, I usually
don't pack a flash as well :)
...or if
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=2006121618
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I'm adding memory to my two-week-old laptop and since both slots had
memory installed when I bought it, I have to get rid of the memory that
came with it.
I have two: 512 MB, PC2-5300 DDR2 RAM, 667 MHz
$30.00 each or $55.00 for both.
FREE SHIPPING IN U.S.!!
;-) (Should I have put
Some how that does not look like what I would call a blizzard. They
would not even have closed the schools when I was a kid. Although it is
more of one than the Blizzard of '05 here in the NC mountains. Folks
will remember my posting a photo of my car with a half inch of snow on
it. Leave it
In a message dated 3/2/2007 6:23:21 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wish I could remember where and when I found something that used
another notation. It may have been common era or not. It
was an international group,
I think it's pretty
In a message dated 3/2/2007 6:09:08 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ouch! :-) You can always use IMAP to access your aol mail (Thunderbird
is my IMAP client of choice). If you need help setting it up, let me
know, I have all the port and server settings. For what
There's this excellent Chinese comparison with the FA 77mm:
http://digi.163.com/06/1103/10/2V0DUTSQ001618EI.html
Bertil
2 mar 2007 kl. 15:04 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've seen PBase sample photos of SMCP 70mm f2.4 Limited. Very nice.
Can't find in-depth reviews. Any information?
--
PDML
Remember 99% of the folks out there use an auto cam permanently on P.
It turns on the flash based upon light level. Neither aesthetics nor
common sense apply.
-graywolf
Toralf Lund wrote:
Just a quick reality check.
Would any of you lot use the popup-flash when shooting something like
WOW, nice test page!
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Bertil
Holmberg
Sendt: 2. marts 2007 16:04
Til: pdml@pdml.net
Emne: Re: SMCP 70mm f2.4
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX2.
Beautifully made, (rebadged as Leica), panoramic mode, opportunity for
creative control, nice lens. What more could a man ask for?
Beaker wrote:
Hi-
Anyone have a favorite pocketable digital camera? It may be time to
look for one...
Thanks
Mike Beacom
--
On a completely off topic note. Can anyone tell me why there is an
image of Snow White and Grumpy in the Chinese review that Bertil
posted the link to? (The animation art collector in me is curious.)
Any Chinese reader on the list?
On 3/2/07, Bertil Holmberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's
Are you suggesting rabbit eggs have nothing to do with Jesus?
Norm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 3/1/2007 1:48:48 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I suggest you look up solar calendars and sun worshipping.
Specifically the festival of Sol Invictus and
Current Era, and Previous Era. The problem scientists have is that they
need a stable base to date from, today keeps moving. I guess it could be
anything, but until fairly recently most of our science texts were
written by Europeans, so that one became the defacto standard.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Us Mayans disagree with you, as do the Buddhists, Jews, and Muslims. The
historical information actually seems to indicate that JC was born in
32BC. The Causality Police are still investigating.
-graywolf, who sworn he was not going to comment on this thread. So you
guys are responsible for my
On Mar 1, 2007, at 21:45, Beaker wrote:
Hi-
Anyone have a favorite pocketable digital camera? It may be time to
look for one...
Fuji F20!
Got mine for about $150. Fast response for both powerup and focus,
ISO up to 2000! (better if you keep it to 800 and below). Nice
screen... and
The new standard is CE (common era) and BCE (before common era).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Era
On 3/2/07, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Current Era, and Previous Era. The problem scientists have is that they
need a stable base to date from, today keeps moving. I guess it could be
graywolf wrote:
-graywolf, who sworn he was not going to comment on this thread.
So you guys are responsible for my going to hell as forsworn, I will
spend eternity there cursing the lot of you GRIN.
If you're going to hell you won't be cursing at us you'll be *with* us
;-)
--
PDML
To answer my own question I turned to babelfish:
===
May see from the above picture, smc PENTAX-DA 21mm F3.2AL Limited, smc
PENTAX-DA 40mm F2.8 Limited and smc PENTAX-DA 70mm F2.4 the Limited
these three section lens volume is truly extremely small, in here
called it certainly does not have the
Finny thing, my old AF400T will still give flash ready signal in the
viewfinder of the K10D. I suspect that the 280T will too. Same
basic technology.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, March 2, 2007, 1:15:53 AM, you wrote:
From: cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/03/02 Fri AM 12:17:43
32BC? Last I checked the consensus was around 3BC, with the crucifixion
in 33 AD. When did it change?
-Adam
graywolf wrote:
Us Mayans disagree with you, as do the Buddhists, Jews, and Muslims. The
historical information actually seems to indicate that JC was born in
32BC. The Causality
AFAIK (but could be wrong) both 540FGZ and 360FGZ provide A mode and
dedication (so can be used on a P3/P30 for example) and analogTTL
(SuperA, 645, LX). So basicaly they work with anything Pentax you can
put them on.
For the 360 FGZ I'm pretty sure.
2007/3/2, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Adam Maas wrote:
32BC? Last I checked the consensus was around 3BC, with the crucifixion
in 33 AD. When did it change?
Um, how would you like us to specify the year?
g
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Thibouille
Subject: Re: older flashes with K10, Pentax's response
AFAIK (but could be wrong) both 540FGZ and 360FGZ provide A mode and
dedication (so can be used on a P3/P30 for example) and analogTTL
(SuperA, 645, LX). So basicaly they work with anything
Paul, what state are you located in. ? J
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 3/2/2007 7:20:24 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BTW: Scientist types no longer use BC and AD, but PE and CE.
Thanks, graywolf!!! THAT was it. That's what I read somewhere.
I wasn't going to comment either, but also got hoovered in. I
Here's a shot from the trailer park series I did about four years ago.
I was looking at those shots this morning and saw another crop for this
one. I also saw it in BW. Click on larger to make it larger:-).Here
it is:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5667450size=md
--
PDML
I'm in Bloomfield Hills Michigan, about twenty miles north of Detroit.
Paul
On Mar 2, 2007, at 11:25 AM, J wrote:
Paul, what state are you located in. ? J
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 3/1/2007 7:20:37 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was talking in the sense that we use a nomenclature that refers to
things as B.C. and A.D, with the implicit recognition that our counting
of years, forwards or backwards is
I suggest you look up solar calendars and sun worshipping.
Specifically the festival of Sol Invictus and Mithraism, which
actually competed with Christianity in the beginnings. The bottom line
is that Christmas coincides with the solstice because this was good to
market Christianity
No! No!
Do _not_ measure with a cheap volt meter!
Many cheap voltmeters are not very high ohmic.
As a result it will load the trigger voltage point of the flash,
reducing the measured voltage.
This is specifically true for the flashes with high voltage, they mostly
have a high impedance input
The type of connection (SATA or ATA) does not matter speedwise Boris, it's
the (empty) new harddisk that makes the difference :-)
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Boris Liberman
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 6:21 AM
To:
Yes. And all of this leads me to the following conclusion:
Many people judge Christianity and religion in general negatively, and
rightly so because of the hypocrisy they see.
But, then they are not really judging Christianity, because a counterfeit
form of something is not the real thing.
Havent heard anything on the sigma, Whats the speed?
To me the pentax 50-200DA is marginal at F5.6 on the
long end. As far as my comments go, I specifically
was talking using the 45-125K in a TWO lens, relatively
fast, high quality, standard range setup (~28-200 on FF, ~18-135 on
APS) not three.
The perfect carry-around digital camera does not yet exist - at least,
not yet in my eyes. For that, it would have to be the digital equivalent
of the Leica CL
http://www.photoethnography.com/ClassicCameras/index-frameset.html?
LeicaCL.html~mainFrame
http://tinyurl.com/cj6pk
In other words, a
On 2/3/07, Peter Jordan, discombobulated, unleashed:
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX2.
Nearly - but no optical viewfinder? Pah!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
I doubt if most of the people who end up using pop-up flashes for
those kind of shots do so deliberately. By far the most likely
scenario, if you ask me, is that they've never bothered to find
the setting that turns off auto-flash-popup.
Of course I'm sure there are some photographers who have
Hi Ken
how does your pop up flash diffuser look like? Selfmade or not?
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
K.Takeshita
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 2:32 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: On other photographers...
I
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 08:32:09AM -0500, K.Takeshita wrote:
I never thought pop-ups are strong enough for any of the situation you
described. There may be a special effect to light up only a small part and
ice sculpture might be one of them.
Despite the argument that pop-ups are useless
I guess you and I just have totally different priorities. I
dont use the 200-300mm (FF equiv)/(135-200 APS) range on zooms hardly at
all (its a speciality, rather than general purpose, range based
on actual needs for me, and when I go that long, I generally prefer
primes ).
In the more common
Not at all in the two cases you mention. However on-camera popup flash does
come in handy at times and I'm glad it's there.
For instance, night-skiing at Bogus Basin last Sunday.
My son is on the left.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5667668size=lg
Tom C.
From: Toralf Lund
In a message dated 3/2/2007 9:30:50 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Ken
how does your pop up flash diffuser look like? Selfmade or not?
greetings
Markus
=
I'm curious too, sounds like a darn good idea. Might be helpful occasionally
with macro shots or
On 3/02/07 12:27 PM, Markus Maurer, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how does your pop up flash diffuser look like? Selfmade or not?
Hi Markus,
When I use a pop-up, it is mostly in close quarter indoor people shots, when
available room light is not enough.
I used all kinds of stuff ranging from
Ideal amount of lighting for this scene.
You're older than you posts indicate. ;~)))
If lens length allows, I use it for any number of casual in-house
'recordings' and closer out-house people fill.
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not at all in the two cases you mention. However
Godfrey, I've just installed the LR that came on CD.
Except a B4 appearing on top of EULA it is the same as the one I
downloaded for trial from Adobe site. I think that local Adobe rep just
wanted to make sure I wasn't going to try to enter my serial to beta
version or something. You know,
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 11:20:44AM +0100, Jens Bladt wrote:
IMO Auto modes - especially programmet AE - never worked well with Pentax
cameras and a flash.
The camera will just set the shutter speed and aperture as if there was no
flash attatched!
That's exactly contrary to my experience with
On Mar 2, 2007, at 4:51 AM, Walter Hamler wrote:
I'm not saying you cant use other specialty ranges but where are
you going
to get a good 18-80mm to go with your 80-200?
Sigma makes a 17~70 that is quite nice according to the reviews. I
doubt
that it covers FF at the short end but
The crop, the rebalancing in the sky, etc help a lot. Well worth it. :)
G
On Mar 1, 2007, at 3:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, recropped and redone a bit.
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/row3.htm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 12:14:56PM +0100, Jens Bladt wrote:
Any dedicated flash can be used in ANY mode on the K10D. (Except they don't
do TTL with the K10D - no flash does TTL on K10D!).
There's is one exception though - flashes like the old AF500FTZ, that does
NOT feature Automatic
http://tinyurl.com/2uj6m
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Ah, yes. Didn't comment before, but I like this now. It needs color
(and the straight horizon). Very good.
Paul
On Mar 2, 2007, at 1:14 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The crop, the rebalancing in the sky, etc help a lot. Well worth it. :)
G
On Mar 1, 2007, at 3:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the speed of the disk IO operations does make a difference.
Most of the SATA drives are faster than the ATA-100 drives. However,
whether SATA would net any speed increase in your particular system
configuration I couldn't say.
(I have two 500G SATA internal drives in the Power Mac G5
On Mar 2, 2007, at 9:24 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 2/3/07, Peter Jordan, discombobulated, unleashed:
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX2.
Nearly - but no optical viewfinder? Pah!
For someone like you to say that? Pah! back to you.
Use superglue and fit a standard accessory shoe. Then you can fit the
On Mar 2, 2007, at 9:24 AM, Cotty wrote:
The perfect carry-around digital camera does not yet exist - at least,
not yet in my eyes. For that, it would have to be the digital
equivalent
of the Leica CL
That's the Holy Grail of many folks, and nothing like it exists yet.
Sigma's DP-1
My photographic needs are changing somewhat and this lens, much as I
love it, is not getting much use. There are other needs on my list
that are more pressing at this time which is causing me to sell an
item or two.
K 200/2.5 - The built-in hood is slightly dented, but still works -
other than
graywolf wrote:
Remember 99% of the folks out there use an auto cam permanently on P.
It turns on the flash based upon light level. Neither aesthetics nor
common sense apply.
Probably.
What struck me on this particular event, however, was that several
people with reasonably professional
No.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discuss pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 3:14 AM
Subject: On other photographers...
Just a quick reality check.
Would any of you lot use the popup-flash when shooting something like
I've never 'accidentally' detached a lens from the body with the K-
mount.
However, I have often noticed that changing lenses with the Pentax
mount seems to be a little slower than changing lenses on my Nikon or
Canon SLRs was. I find I have to change hand positions on the lenses
and body
Mark Roberts wrote:
K.Takeshita wrote:
Despite the argument that pop-ups are useless and pro-gears
should not have them etc, I think it's useful if you know when to
use it.
You bet. When hiking trails with a full pack of camping gear, I usually
don't pack a flash as well :)
...or
I see the popup flash as useful when you haven't planned for a normal
flash. It is certainly better than not having it, but it is almost
always better to have a bigger flash available. So I have used it in
a pinch here and there like you - mostly for family snaps.
Also for those who are doing
On Mar 2, 2007, at 5:53 AM, Roman wrote:
I've seen PBase sample photos of SMCP 70mm f2.4 Limited. Very nice.
Can't find in-depth reviews. Any information?
I had the FA77 and now have the DA70.
Reviewing the couple thousand pictures I have made with both, they
are so close in sharpness,
I converted to Canon once, but I've long repented...
Say three Hasselblads shoot digital from now on.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Bong Manayon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: The tomb of Jesus
I converted to Canon once, but I've long repented...
Bong
On 3/2/07,
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Absolutely not. On the first, the popup (or any flash) would create a
white hole in the first few rows of the crowd. With the second shot, it
would do nothing save perhaps create an unpleasant glow if there is
mist or smoke in the air.
That's what I though, more or
So now I'm signed up on smugmug -
when quickly uploaded my ashley calendar pics and chose smugmug
watermark I got a
large and too concealing proof across the center of the image...
one is permitted to use one's own watermark
which I figure I would like to just be my copyright very faint along
In a message dated 3/2/2007 10:26:21 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The crop, the rebalancing in the sky, etc help a lot. Well worth it. :)
G
=
Thanks, Godfrey.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
BRBRBR**BR AOL now offers free
email
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 3/1/2007 1:48:48 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I suggest you look up solar calendars and sun worshipping.
Specifically the festival of Sol Invictus and Mithraism, which
actually competed with Christianity in the
Toralf Lund schreef:
The point was that I observed many people, including some with what
looked like real cameras (if you know what I mean) using the popup flash
on this event.
No I don't... I thought that real camera's didn't have pop up flashes?
Groeten,
Vic
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
1 - 100 of 287 matches
Mail list logo
