I've been working on a set of photos taken on a day trip to Alcatraz
in September 2006. These two photos caught my eye ... I'm not sure
they fit with the rest of this set as yet, but they could be bookends.
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/15.htm
Samsung decided to follow the trend in the digital camera world and made
their firmware upgrade available for manual download and installation by
the end user. As expected, new features are similar to Pentax K10D
firmware updates 1.10 and 1.11:
* Wireless mode for built-in flash
* AF
Just had to submit this after seeing P.J. Alling's Ikea breakfast:
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=samson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I once had a trigger like this:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/444663052/?reuploaded=1
Called the cube. Very good - it could trigger any flash in the room -
almost no matter from where it was fired.
Does anyone remember the brnd name of this - so I can get annother one just
like it?
Regards
I thinks it's a great idea to photograph boring everyday things. What
surrounds us every day. Such photograps can decribe iur/you culture and will
be very interesting in 10 or 20 years. Your children may appreciated these
at some point later on.
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
Thank you Rick
I didn't have to do it as a 30 shot pano, but a single wide angle shot
couldn't capture all of the detail to my satisfaction...besides, it was a
challenge. It's actually quite a high waterfall, I just didn't bother
trying to capture the main falls, just the cascade at the base.
Thank you Fernando
I used AutoPano Pro for the stitching.
- Original Message -
From: Fernando Terrazzino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 4:44 AM
Subject: Re: PESO - Fairy Bower Falls
Hi James,
Very nice. What software did
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/04/02 Mon PM 10:42:19 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: GESO: Photos taken in near total darkness...
On Apr 2, 2007, at 2:37 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
Did you ever bring a camera with to a show only to
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 19:50:10 -0400, Christian wrote:
Two birds in a perfect formation:
http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?id=218
Nice composition!
Thanks Christian!
Allthough it is mainly the birds that determine the composition,
I merely pick out the better shots :-)
It's a
In a message dated 4/2/2007 5:57:08 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://i.pbase.com/o6/87/63987/1/76532119.31qAeDgY.IMGP0707.jpg
If you are so inclined, please pray that her passing will be
comforted by the Creator and those who love her.
Thank you,
John James
Very nice shots. I like moody.
I do stuff like that form time to time.
I usually bring a monopod - and a portable harddrive/card reader - so
shooting RAW is not really a problem - just rember to bring (at least) two
cards :-)
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43
Thanks Markus,
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 23:21:14 +0200, Markus Maurer wrote:
Very good for such an unusual combination of teleconverters, I'm surprised
:-)
It may not be that unusual.
The 1.4L and 2xL converters are 'matched' converters for this
specific lens (and a few others like the 400 2.8 and
In a message dated 4/2/2007 3:18:13 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Some may remember this PESO from a couple of years ago
http://www.mindspring.com/~megazip/PESO_--_ikeabkfst.html
It isn't the only picture I've taken celebrating boredom a cheap
breakfast and a free
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/04/02 Mon PM 09:34:54 GMT
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Enablement: bag and cutter
On 2/4/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
He's engaged the Planet Builders of Magrathea ...
Funny you should say that - I've just
Hi Bruce,
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 21:39:54 -0700, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Kind of a cool shot - not something I see very often.
Thanks!
Conditions don't look ideal, but the scene captured is quite
documentary.
Well, lighting is often pretty harsh, blowing out some highlights.
It can be pretty
Thanks for the good commet Bruce, appreciate it!
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 22:01:23 -0700, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Both are close to great, but just not quite. The first is a bit
better, but could be really great with just a little more DOF so the
upper bird were as sharp as the lower bird.
Yes, I agree.
Switching focus points is not really an option.The game is much too fast for
this. The biggest visible difference between amateur and pro football
players (or kids and adults) is the speed! I agree to what you are saying
about focal length. A 28-300 f. 2.8 would be great :-)
But I guess it's
Thanks Jack (plus Tom, Peter and everyone else commenting)
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:38:04 -0700 (PDT), Jack Davis wrote:
Formation shot especially nice. Too bad wings weren't completely
set, but it's one to be proud of as is.
Jack
I will try to improve on it, the refuge hosts many birds,
mostly
On 3/4/07, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Are they white? (Gulp)
Don't be ridiculous. The old man with the beard and flowing robe took
them all away.
Cute brown faces. I used 'live capture' traps and released them into my
idiot neighbour's garden.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 15:06:15 -0400, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Both, very nice.
Thanks Kenneth,
Any crop ?
Yes, the formation one is about a 70% crop out of a horizontal frame,
the landing goose is even more, less than half of the original frame.
I need to get closer :-)
(But I would also like to
Hi John,
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 23:36:41 -0400, John Francis wrote:
Hmmm. I'm wending my way towards Vegas; I'm typing this in a motel room
halfway down I15 from Salt Lake City, heading for Bryce Canyon tomorrow,
and Zion the day after. I'll have to look up Valley of Fire on the map.
It is right
Stephen,
I decided to get a FA 50mm f/1.4 mid March this year.
As I had problems with BH authentication of my VISA payment attempts on the
web orders and they would not accept a backorder in my phone contact after
the small quantity available one USA night were sold b4 the store opened I
went to
I did it turns out they didn't like it.
Oh well.
Cheers,
Dave
On 3/29/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of mine that made collection I almost didn't submit at all. I've
never really shown it as a PESO. But they seem to like the real
punchy stuff. I'd submit it.
DS
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Odd, my first impression was that she was rubbing her eye like she was
tired, rather than crying.
That's the way I read it, Bruce...
The gesture is rubbing your eyes an forehead, not wiping away tears...
keith
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
It is their fault, not yours!
Jack Davis wrote:
Pentax Gallery reject.
Thanks!
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very nice! I wouldn't change a thing.
Splendid photo if you ask me.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Charles, you did excellent job, given the circumstances.
Judging from the EXIF data (notably focal lengths) you used Tamron
28-75/2.8 lens. This is fine lens indeed. However you could have tried
faster primes such as 50 mm lenses (either f1.7 or f1.4 varieties) or
even limited lenses. This
ann sanfedele wrote:
Walter Hamler wrote:
Well, the July Theme is Visual Pollution, so I would say there should be
lots of good entries from the USA!!!
I'm thinking billboards and junkyards here!
Well I won't want to take anything at GFM for that month - its much too
beautiful!
I
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/04/03 Tue AM 09:08:42 GMT
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Enablement: bag and cutter
On 3/4/07, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Are they white? (Gulp)
Don't be ridiculous. The old man with the beard and flowing robe took
On Apr 3, 2007, at 6:46, Boris Liberman wrote:
Charles, you did excellent job, given the circumstances.
Judging from the EXIF data (notably focal lengths) you used Tamron
28-75/2.8 lens. This is fine lens indeed. However you could have tried
faster primes such as 50 mm lenses (either f1.7 or
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I've been working on a set of photos taken on a day trip to Alcatraz
in September 2006. These two photos caught my eye ... I'm not sure
they fit with the rest of this set as yet, but they could be bookends.
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/15.htm
Good to know it works for you, Bruce.
Thanks.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool! Works for me. Love the BW treatment on this. Great eye.
--
Bruce
Monday, April 2, 2007, 10:56:13 AM, you wrote:
JD This image would have been up during the recent Hitchcock/Birds
David Savage wrote:
All I know is your bucking a lot of tried and true practices for
displaying images on the web to suit your vision of how the rest of
the internet using population should be working.
Given the person whom you are addressing, does this surprise you at all?
--
PDML
Great remarks to read, Boris.
Thanks.
Jack
--- Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is their fault, not yours!
Jack Davis wrote:
Pentax Gallery reject.
Thanks!
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very nice! I wouldn't change a thing.
Splendid photo if you ask
Try:
http://www.theflashcentre.com/flash-triggers-c156.html
http://www.pocketwizard.com/HTML/products.asp
This one will be good for studio lights:
http://www.alienbees.com/rft1.html
Note, they aren't the cube, but they should do what you want.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From:
I assume Mark Roberts and or David Savage didnt read or understand
my post remarking that this wasnt posted for the the rest of the
internet
population, it was posted only to a photo group which
should have in my honest opinion, a HIGHER
atandard of image quality and a HIGHER than
average spec of
On Apr 2, 2007, at 5:42 PM, Christian wrote:
.. why don't YOU address the issues!
y'all got issues.
Nazi rule
G
Godfrey Godwins? Great.
John
--
http://www.neovenator.com
http://www.cafepress.com/neovenatorphoto
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Apr 3, 2007, at 5:59 AM, Christian wrote:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/15.htm
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/16.htm
Hey, Godders, I really like these! The simplicity works for me. I
especially like the way the sails kinda glow in the first shot. I
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I assume Mark Roberts and or David Savage didnt read or understand
my post remarking that this wasnt posted for the the rest of the
internet
Understand YOUR post? No one understands your posts. JCO, you're
OBVIOUSLY on a plane much higher than anyone else can EVER
ELITEST? - NO F%#ING WAY! This is a photo enthusiast
group, it's not elistist to cater to that groups interest.
Is just plain STUPID to ruin all the files by making them
really small for the general internet population when
they are NOT being directed at that population. Go kill
yourself,,,
jco
Just picked up on these, Godfrey. Like every aspect of beautifully
composed 16.htm.
15.htm has a stirring dramatic quality.
Jack
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 3, 2007, at 5:59 AM, Christian wrote:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/15.htm
Jan - I looked at your whole gallery from the refuge -- I haven't been
able to do much but skim
the list for the last few weeks - people kept mentioning the birds but
not including the link or links in
their return posts...
I love water fowl - my fave is the baby Grebe tailing behind dad
J and K Messervy wrote:
This is a 30 (!) shot panorama (5 rows of 6 shots). Each shot was taken at
55mm focal length and the stitched image was a little over 1gb and
equivalent to 123 megapixels! This has been heavily resized obviously but
I'll be printing this about 60cm by 35cm when
I have a weekness for old rangefiinders.
I just got a Minolta AL-F - for 20 USD. Introduced in 1967 but it looks like
new.
After adjusting the rangefinder and supplying it with a battery, it works
perfectly.
It has a funny flash system:
You must dial in the Guide Number of the flash you are
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Shot while wandering around today. I'd like to think I was a great
tracker or something, but this one was not overly timid. I was able
to approach a reasonable distance before she took off.
Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 240mm, Handheld
ISO 560, 1/180 sec @ f/8
No I don't remember the name, but I remember seeing them, wanting to buy
one, and somehow never actually making the purchase.
Jens Bladt wrote:
I once had a trigger like this:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/444663052/?reuploaded=1
Called the cube. Very good - it could trigger any flash in
P.S. I am not having any problems to solve,
only the people who want me to dumb way down
my posted photos for them are... I suggest
those still using really old low spec displays find some
resizing software or something to make them more
usable, if they cant be bothered to upgrade
their
Boredom can be a wonderful thing.
Toralf Lund wrote:
Just had to submit this after seeing P.J. Alling's Ikea breakfast:
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=samson
--
Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf
thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb
I've tried to stay out of this, but your last comments just rankled me.
The PDML is comprised of the same people that comprise the net's general
population. People are here from all over the world, come from all
socio-economic situations, and for whatever reason have computers ranging
from
Jens Bladt wrote:
Well done, Cotty. The wine should be just as nice :-)
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Cotty
Sendt: 29. marts 2007
Face it Jens, you've started collection. You're doomed...
Jens Bladt wrote:
I have a weekness for old rangefiinders.
I just got a Minolta AL-F - for 20 USD. Introduced in 1967 but it looks like
new.
After adjusting the rangefinder and supplying it with a battery, it works
perfectly.
It
On 4/3/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Savage wrote:
All I know is your bucking a lot of tried and true practices for
displaying images on the web to suit your vision of how the rest of
the internet using population should be working.
Given the person whom you are
I didn't see this before, the flower may be too punchy, but I think it's
too centered and too perfect, but that's just me. The Technicolor
doesn't bother me so much.
David Savage wrote:
I did it turns out they didn't like it.
Oh well.
Cheers,
Dave
On 3/29/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL
It was deliberately tipped. I was practicing the trick of balancing a
salt shaker on a grain of salt. I set one of these with the shaker
tipped to the left as well, like I said, boredom...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/2/2007 3:18:13 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL
I remember selling those cameras when I had a job at a camera shop in
my first couple of years of college... !
The auto-flash-by-coupled-GN was popular on a number of cameras at
the time as auto-flash units (with light sensors and quench circuits
built in) didn't become common or popular
Unless your idiot neighbor lives more than a quarter mile or so away
they may find their way back home.
Cotty wrote:
On 3/4/07, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Are they white? (Gulp)
Don't be ridiculous. The old man with the beard and flowing robe took
them all away.
No I understood what you said.
The photo's you posted were fine for what they are and from what I
saw. But because they are the resolution they are I only looked at 1
or 2 at full size because I couldn't view them without having to
scroll around. It annoyed me, so I stopped looking.
IMO if you
You don't know what you're talking about, or what the demographic of this
list is. There are people here who can just barely afford one camera and a
basic lens or two; there are people with various vision problems; there are
people who have more important things to spend their money on than
Walt, here is a bit of anecdotal evidence to you. One of the guys in the
local camera club has exactly this combo - Bessa camera (one without
built-in viewfinder) and 15/4.5 lens. The lens is tiny, the outcome is
tremendous. It is very well corrected (very rectilinear) and it is very
sharp. Lovely
Your not one of those IKEA people are you?
Cheers,
Dave :-)
On 4/3/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some may remember this PESO from a couple of years ago
http://www.mindspring.com/~megazip/PESO_--_ikeabkfst.html
It isn't the only picture I've taken celebrating boredom a cheap
The first one doesn't grab me. I find the LHS too dark and heavy
The second one however, I like a lot. Nice one.
Cheers,
Dave
On 4/3/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been working on a set of photos taken on a day trip to Alcatraz
in September 2006. These two photos caught
I can't really say I'm surprised. Even without Pentax Gallery approval
it's still remains my personal all time favorite flower shot :-)
People in the past have commented on the saturated colour, and the
thing is, I rendered it how I saw it. The light colours were really
like that.
Thanks for
From:
Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Apr 2, 2007, at 8:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... What's HDR?
High Dynamic Range ... a technique where layering several identical
exposures made at different EV settings can be used to increase the
effective dynamic range able to be captured.
Godfrey
Only if I'm going to be in the area. It's better than McDonald's and
less expensive.
David Savage wrote:
Your not one of those IKEA people are you?
Cheers,
Dave :-)
On 4/3/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some may remember this PESO from a couple of years ago
From:
Shel Belinkoff
http://www.climaxphoto.com/film/film_supplies/film_extractors.html
Just a small sample of what's available. Over the years I've used a few
styles and found the simple stainless steel to be the best for my needs and
skill level.
Shel
The first one, the FilmPicker35
Here's my take on the same subject.
http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PESO_--_gms.html
David Savage wrote:
I can't really say I'm surprised. Even without Pentax Gallery approval
it's still remains my personal all time favorite flower shot :-)
People in the past have commented on the
Nice. Obviously no sun falling on that flower. ;-)
Cheers,
Dave
On 4/4/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's my take on the same subject.
http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PESO_--_gms.html
David Savage wrote:
I can't really say I'm surprised. Even without Pentax Gallery
G'day All,
While searching through my archives recently I came across this one
that I thought I'd share (~110kb):
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/PESO/peso_027.htm
As always any and all comments much appreciated..
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I like them both, but i have a preference for the second one, the
single sail boat. The over all feel to the shot has an errie calm to
it, even though you can see the swells and knowing the boat is moving.
Good job
Dave Brooks
On 4/3/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been
Maybe I should try going in there with my fisheye...
Thanks, Bruce!
Rick
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For me, this one screams out to be shot much wider -
get real close
and shoot wide to emphasize how crowded it looks.
As presented, it
doesn't seem to portray what you
It is and I like it. Well composed.
Thanks for the look.
Jack
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
While searching through my archives recently I came across this one
that I thought I'd share (~110kb):
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/PESO/peso_027.htm
As always any and
The first shot to me, is less about a sailboat and more about the
rough sea. It is gritty and harsh looking and kind of gets the
feeling across. I like it better than the second.
The second is good, too. But I don't see these as particularly a set
- like bookends as you describe it. This shot
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5804105
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
David Savage wrote:
if you want people to view your images and make comments, you
shouldn't piss them off with a shithouse presentation. Web design 101.
I think I'll simplify (and sanitize!) that and use it in my web design
class:
if you want people to view your web pages, you shouldn't piss
In a message dated 4/3/2007 9:05:23 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
G'day All,
While searching through my archives recently I came across this one
that I thought I'd share (~110kb):
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/PESO/peso_027.htm
As always any and all comments much
In a message dated 4/2/2007 11:40:00 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've been working on a set of photos taken on a day trip to Alcatraz
in September 2006. These two photos caught my eye ... I'm not sure
they fit with the rest of this set as yet, but they could be
Tom C wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5804105
didn't we ban you from posting images? :-) Another really nice shot, Tom.
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 4/3/2007 9:28:20 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5804105
Tom C.
=
Pretty.
Marnie aka Doe
** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Yea, yea, yea, another beautiful picture of the woods. I still hate you.
Tom C wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5804105
Tom C.
--
Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf
thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq
HUH? Are you freaking retarded? This group is NOT
the same as the general population regarging photo displays/
imaging. This is a PHOTO specific group, and as such
should be much more attuned to image quality
and should/does have HIGHER than internet average displays
for PHOTOGRAPHIC PURPOSES.
it's called CONVICTION and strong non-waving opinions
which have be formed and ingrained via proven years of
experince, not inflexibility.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Savage
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 10:41 AM
To:
ARE YOU ALSO RETARDED? THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH
MY PRESENTATION - ITS YOUR FUCKING LOW SPEC COMPUTER
DISPLAY THAT CANT HANDLE THE QUALITY OF THE PRESENTATION
THATST THE PROBLEM. DONT BLAME ME FOR YOUR SHITTY SETUP
OR EXPECT ME TO DUMB DOWN/DEGRADE MY IMAGES TO
SUIT YOUR SHIT DISPLAY.
JCO
IF YOUR'E ANNOYED WITH YOUR SETUP, UPGRADE IT,
DONT BLAME ME FOR YOUR CRAPPY OLD SPEC. SETUP. PUT
THE BLAME WHERE BLAME IS DUE, O NY O U RE N D.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Savage
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 10:51
I could never get the hang of that one ... just goes to show y' that it
pays to try out different brands/styles until you find the one that suits
you.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: John Sessoms
From:
Shel Belinkoff
http://www.climaxphoto.com/film/film_supplies/film_extractors.html
SCREW YOU, WHEN YOU FINALLY UPGRADE SOME
DAY ( WHY ARE YOU WAITING? CANT AFFORD
IT? I DONT BELIEVE THAT ).
YOU WILL ONLY T H E N UNDERSTAND THAT IT MAKES/MADE NO
SENSE TO BE USING THOSE OLD RESOLUTIONS
WHEN YOU CAN/COULD HAVE UPGRADED SO INEXPENSIVELY
TODAY 4/3/07 ! THIS IS A PHOTO GROUP, DUH!
JCO
Great shot, Jan. Brilliant!
The shot we all hope to get some day :-)
regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Kenneth
Waller
Sendt: 28. marts 2007
And as such, encompasses a wide range of people with different needs,
budgets, values, experience, and interests. This is starting to remind me
of the HDTV thread a while back. Can't you get it through your thick skull
that not everyone can afford or even want the best.
And what hubris you have
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
JacksonCollectorCarAuctions2007WestPalmBeach...
I will hold my tongue and not say what's really on my mind, but in the
spirit of being the New Yorker that I am, I'll sign off now with one quick
comment: You're am elitist snob and a
I've been thinking lately about the cost of doing photography and
finishing photographs for web publication. A recent, erm, thread got me
steamed up enough to post this. Basically, how much can you accomplish
without spending any more money than it cost you to obtain your
hardware? First
Sometimes puttering around the kitchen is almost as enjoyable as reading
the PDML.
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/vegstock.html
Made with the little Sony DSC-S85
In this case comments, suggestions, and rotten tomatoes are especially
welcome and appropriate.
Shel
--
PDML
Hi Ann,
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 10:14:06 -0400, ann sanfedele wrote:
Jan - I looked at your whole gallery from the refuge -- I haven't been
able to do much but skim
the list for the last few weeks - people kept mentioning the birds but
not including the link or links in
their return posts...
Yes
JC,
I believe that the PDML list consists of photo enthusiasts with a specific
interest in Pentax equipment.
I believe that the PDML list consists largely of intelligent, thoughtful
participants.
I believe that PDML list participants use the list to share information and
images with each
Thanks Jens,
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 19:45:46 +0200, Jens Bladt wrote:
Great shot, Jan. Brilliant!
The shot we all hope to get some day :-)
I agree the posing and timing was great, I just do not like
the blown highlights (with purple fringing/blooming)
But it remains one of my better (lucky :-)
David ... at first glance I'd have to say this is a great shot. I didn't
even look for technical flaws - I just like the pic very much. It's one of
the most pleasing pics I've seen on the list recently.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: David Savage
G'day All,
While searching through my
Excellent composition, Tom. Tough to do with this sort of scene. Rock
well used.
Silence would, also, have worked as a title.
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5804105
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hmmm there's something about this that I like -perhaps the simplicity
- but the tilted salt shaker and the black blob in the URH corner detract
from the possibilities. Maybe if the salt shaker were on it's side
just thinking aloud.
Shel
It isn't the only picture I've taken
That's a beautiful, peaceful photo. Someday, you'll
have to come to GFM and bring along a whole stack of
large prints!
Rick
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5804105
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You and I may think he is a fool for doing so, I've never thought that
shooting oneself in the foot is the smart way to do things, but if it is
his way, and it works for him, then it's what he is going to do.
But wait... It is very very smart if your intent
YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY CLUELESS ON THIS. THE HIGHER YOUR SCREEN RESOLUTION,
THE BETTER THE IMAGES LOOK ON THE SCREEN AND THE
EASIER IT IS TO EDIT THE IMAGES. SAYING AVID/SERIOUS PHOTOGRAPHERS
(THE TYPE THAT WOULD SUBSCRIBE TO PHOTO WEB LIST LIKE THIS LIST)
DONT NEED OR CANT/WONT BENEFIT FROM A HIGHER
It's certainly calm. I like it. Nice Composition.
On 4/3/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
While searching through my archives recently I came across this one
that I thought I'd share (~110kb):
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/PESO/peso_027.htm
As always any and all
Being spoiled by the amount of control I get for BW conversions from
the DSLRs, I decided to shoot some color film while thinking bw.
This was shot on Kodak Portra 160. OT, since the camera was the M6
with Summicron 50. Sorry.
I'm happy with the result, and probably will be shooting this way
1 - 100 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
