Indeed, Thibouille, I tried shooting PEFs and I got results very similar
to what you reported. I may be shooting PEFs for a while now...
Thanks!
Boris
Thibouille wrote:
I'm tranfering a couple shot right now so I can tell you a bit more
precisely about the file sizes.
I shot PEF of course
Quoting William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is 2 shots using the A400/5.6 married together.
The seam is kinda visible,
Is it? I'm gonna have to get my eyes (re)tested.
Apart from that, I like it but perhaps some boost to the mid tones would make
it more pleasing.
Cheers
Brian
Just the opposite for me, were all your repairs
PENTAX brand lenses? Mine were.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mishka
Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2007 10:46 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Problem with A* 200 macro
I have
What protecting glass / UV filter brands do you use on DSLR.
I've good experience with Sigma UV EX DG (for digital). Hoya UV Pro1
Digital I recently purchased had hard dirt stuck to the glass from the
inner side that has been contacting with porolone in the filter case, so
cleaned it with
On 09/04/07, Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What protecting glass / UV filter brands do you use on DSLR.
I've good experience with Sigma UV EX DG (for digital). Hoya UV Pro1
Digital I recently purchased had hard dirt stuck to the glass from the
inner side that has been contacting with porolone
On film, I mostly used Hoya 1B filters. On digital I've become most
demanding on image quality, hence no more filters on my lenses.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 10:10 AM
Subject: Protection glass / filters
I don't use protective filters.
Cheers,
Dave
On 4/9/07, Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What protecting glass / UV filter brands do you use on DSLR.
I've good experience with Sigma UV EX DG (for digital). Hoya UV Pro1
Digital I recently purchased had hard dirt stuck to the glass from the
I have never used filters for protection in
over 30 years and have never had an incident
where a filter would have made a protective
difference..Just lucky I guess, I do use caps
cases at all times except shooting though...
jco
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hi,
I don't usually muck about much with photos, just presenting them more
or less as they come straight from the camera. However, here are a
couple of photos from a reedbed close to my house:
http://www.web-options.com/Reedbed/
I have altered the curves on both of these because the originals
On 8/4/07, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Not my usual stuff.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/before_coffee.html
Enjoy
Seaweed. Nice.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
I have a Hoya plain glass thing on one lens, and a Contax skylight
filter on the other.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Roman
Sent: 09 April 2007 09:11
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Protection glass / filters
What
On 8/4/07, Brendan MacRae, discombobulated, unleashed:
Wow.
Wow's are more a deep blue colour, I think that's a M.
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4674a.htm
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
http://www.pbase.com/kiwibiologist/dogs_on_holiday
I have just come back from an Easter weekend on the Wairarapa
coastline with some nice images of a seldomly visited part of New
Zealand. Weather was a bit iffy and there was a strong swell
generating a constant sea mist. Will post some BW's
Roman, my limited lenses have Pentax SMC UV protective filters on them
at all times. I notice no deterioration of image quality but I feel
slightly better having invested *a lot* of money into these three lenses.
My other lenses are protected by Pentax UV protective filters (probably
not SMC
Thanks for posting your question, Roman. It is helping me a lot
too...am in this debate with myself to filter or not to filter...? My
hunch is to take off all the filters in shooting digital, but have not
gotten over the protection issue. Somehow wanting to be ready in
case Murphy strikes. My
You're welcome :)
Of course one might prefer using DNG because of the standard (more or
less) of the file format.
As I use Lightroom which can convert them DNG as I import them, I
don't care and prefer using PEF for increased card capacity.
One has to remember an average minimum number of shots
On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 20:46:22 -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I don't quite understand, but you know what you're developing better
than I do.
I hope so :-)
Actually my first stab would be a straight port of my software
to run in a terminal window on OS X, but I do plan to make
the most used
Indeed, very nice capture Bruce!
I really like the three surrounding (oak ?) branches
and the blurred background ...
Regards, JvW
On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 15:35:08 -0700 (PDT), Brendan MacRae wrote:
Wow.
-Brendan
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, ok, it had been quite a while since I
News here:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601080sid=a8aPwjcZNgvsrefer=asia
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Title derived from the Newman painting :-)
Another daffodil, that was on our easter breakfast table ...
http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?id=229
Comments welcome!
Regards, JvW
--
Jan van Wijk;
Thanks Marnie!
On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 23:15:34 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lovely gallery. Like Stork Meeting,
which I don't think you have shown as a PESO.
No, since it lacks a bit of sharpness, the pose is very nice though:
http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?id=224
There are a
I think you're right that they do look muddy but I think your treatment goes a
little too far in the opposite direction.
Looking at 4084944, getting a golden glow on the reeds is on the right track
but seems overdone here. I think you also need to try to retain darkness in
the background
Nice beach.
I'm not a dog fan at all, and would never own one, but I do like to
see animals running free and enjoying themselves. This photo captures
that very well:
http://www.pbase.com/kiwibiologist/image/76889603
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
I'd do the same or as similar as possible...
Boris
David Savage wrote:
Here's my take:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/bkd_4666_std_BD_DSv.jpg
Cheers,
Dave
On 4/8/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure I'm going to get some heckling for forgetting the URL -
Hi Mark,
I think you should take it to a competent lens repairman. It's too
expensive a lens to tinker with. If you happen to be in Detroit, You
could take it to Oakland Photographic Repair on 13 mile and Dequindre.
Paul
On Apr 8, 2007, at 10:15 PM, Mark Cassino wrote:
I had some exposure
Extremely nice nonetheless ;-).
William Robb wrote:
Not my usual stuff.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/before_coffee.html
Enjoy
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Bruce, your birding skills are most impressive!
Boris
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Ok, ok, it had been quite a while since I had last posted any PESO's
so I got a few all at once. This is the last one.
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4674a.htm
Comments welcome
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
It does not look scary to me ;-). So I ain't no afraid ;-).
Jan van Wijk wrote:
Title derived from the Newman painting :-)
Another daffodil, that was on our easter breakfast table ...
http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?id=229
Comments welcome!
Regards, JvW
My sentiment exactly!
Fernando Terrazzino wrote:
Looked at the photo without reading your text. I thouht you had his
head put on the wall
On 4/8/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jester had a bit of surgery a couple of weeks ago.
I thought the disembodied head look to be a bit
Thanks Boris. We had a nice day.
Paul
On Apr 9, 2007, at 8:06 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Happy Holidays to Grace, to you Paul and to everyone!
Boris
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Happy Easter to all. Normally, I would have used the FA 35/2 or the
FA 50/1.4 for this, but the DA 50-200 was mounted,
I use filters only for image modification. And with digital that is
only rarely necessary. I don't use them for lens protection. They
just add another opportunity for flare.
On Apr 9, 2007, at 4:10 AM, Roman wrote:
What protecting glass / UV filter brands do you use on DSLR.
I've good
Thanks Fernando. Glad you noticed the reflection.
Paul
On Apr 9, 2007, at 12:17 AM, Fernando Terrazzino wrote:
I like this one, the light, and the reflection of the board in his
glasses.
On 4/5/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Twenty-two year senior Bill Bust a Big Move Murphy
William Robb wrote:
Not my usual stuff.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/before_coffee.html
Enjoy
William Robb
Have you tried an antacid?
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
William Robb wrote:
This is 2 shots using the A400/5.6 married together.
The seam is kinda visible, I need to work on this technique some more.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/400pano.html
Enjoy
William Robb
I like it - I can't see the seam -- maybe make it a bit darker or
Back a quarter century ago or so, Gamma was the best lab in Chicago.
I googled them, and they're still there at 314 W Superior. That's at
the west end of the loop, just a couple of blocks from the I94 Ohio
Street exit. They have a website at http://www.gammaimaging.com.
Paul
On Apr 8, 2007,
William Robb wrote:
Not my usual stuff.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/before_coffee.html
I usually have to visit there after coffee.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Happy Holidays to Grace, to you Paul and to everyone!
Boris
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Happy Easter to all. Normally, I would have used the FA 35/2 or the
FA 50/1.4 for this, but the DA 50-200 was mounted, and the moment was
upon me.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5818952
Bob,
I'm impressed with your treatment of these images. 4084944 is
exceedingly nice.
Jack
--- Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I don't usually muck about much with photos, just presenting them
more
or less as they come straight from the camera. However, here are a
couple of photos from
Bob W wrote:
Hi,
I don't usually muck about much with photos, just presenting them more
or less as they come straight from the camera. However, here are a
couple of photos from a reedbed close to my house:
http://www.web-options.com/Reedbed/
I have altered the curves on both of these
It was relaxing. I am a little confused as to why it is snowing in
April. Although I did talk to my parents yesterday, and it snowed in
Dallas on saturday, just a few flakes, but in Dallas that counts. And
my brother reported from Arakansas that it snowed there too. Weird.
Russ
On 4/8/07,
I like the originals better; they are very nice.
Rick
--- Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I don't usually muck about much with photos, just
presenting them more
or less as they come straight from the camera.
However, here are a
couple of photos from a reedbed close to my house:
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
Subject: Re: PESO: Prairie Pano
Works for me. Although may I humbly suggest a slight curves adjustment
to bump up the contrast ever so slightly.
Try it again. I did leave it kinda flat
Thanks
William Robb
And I can't find the seam.
- Original Message -
From: ann sanfedele
Subject: Re: PESO: Funny Dog Picture
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/elizabethan_bug.html
aw poor doggie so sweet!
He isn't really, but we had him pretty drugged for a while. Made him seem
nicer.
Thanks for looking
Thanks Fenando, Brian, Ann and Dave for looking. I bumped the levels a bit
on this one...
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/400pano.html
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Fernando Terrazzino
Subject: Re: PESO: Funny Dog Picture
Looked at the photo without reading your text. I thouht you had his
head put on the wall
It's been tempting to do just that from time to time.
Fortunately, his brain is starting to develop now.
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton
Subject: Re: PESO: Funny Dog Picture
Hello William,
yes, the head does kind of jump out at you. It is a fine shot of his
head, though.
Thanks Bruce
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman
Subject: Re: PESO: Funny Dog Picture
My sentiment exactly!
Har!!.
Thanks Boris!!
William Robb
Looked at the photo without reading your text. I thouht you had his
head put on the wall
Thanks Jack, Dave, Fernando, Bruce, Cotty, Boris,Ann and Mike for looking
and commenting.
William Robb
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/before_coffee.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I like it. Is it just a touch soft?
Rick
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is more of a 'Daytonesque' shot (I think Frank
would say that).
Pentax K10D, Tokina AT-X SD 400/5.6, Handheld
ISO 400, 1/350 sec @ f/8
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4690a.htm
Comments
I like this. The tattered web and foreground flowers
separate this from the classical backlit-spider-web
shot.
Rick
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For Dave - this is a web, the spider is there, but
very small. Taken
in my yard.
Pentax K10D, Tamron 90/2.8 Macro, Tripod
ISO
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis
Subject: Re: PESO: Funny Dog Picture
Good looking guy, even while registering befuddled wonderment.
Endearing shot.
Thanks Jack!!
William Robb
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/elizabethan_bug.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
- Original Message -
From: Roman
Subject: Protection glass / filters
What protecting glass / UV filter brands do you use on DSLR.
None of my lenses have protective filters on them.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
None of my lenses has a protective filter on it except the
FA*80-200/2.8, and that's mainly because the lens's own filter threads
are damaged to the extent that it's really difficult to put a filter on
it (and particularly so with a polarizer, which is my most-used
filter). So the SMC Pentax
Okay, Bill, now that you've absorbed the well-deserved
compliments, what the heck =is= it?
Rick
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Jack, Dave, Fernando, Bruce, Cotty, Boris,Ann
and Mike for looking
and commenting.
William Robb
On 4/9/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
Subject: Re: PESO: Prairie Pano
Works for me. Although may I humbly suggest a slight curves adjustment
to bump up the contrast ever so slightly.
Try it again. I did leave it kinda flat
Why would a DSLR require different filters than used on a film camera?
Personally, I think the use of DSLR filters is hype and just a marketing
ploy.
I stopped using protective filters a long time ago, and have stuck with
using good, deep lens hoods. In fact, I've sold most of my protective
- Original Message -
From: Rick Womer
Subject: Re: PESO: Something different
Okay, Bill, now that you've absorbed the well-deserved
compliments, what the heck =is= it?
Sorry. It's frost on the windscreen of my truck, as seen from the inside.
William Robb
Same here.
If you must use a lens condom, B+W multicoated clear optical glass
filters are what I'd recommend.
G
On Apr 9, 2007, at 5:25 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I use filters only for image modification. And with digital that is
only rarely necessary. I don't use them for lens
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Perhaps a little cliche, but I'm liking it anyway.
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/17.htm
cliche? yes! Really nicely done? Yes! Nice shot, godders. The BW
rendering is really nice.
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML
Why use a filter if you prefer not to? Just get an old filter, smash out
the glass, and use the ring. Using a filter with a pol my not be
advantageous.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: 4/9/2007 6:39:37 AM
Rick Womer wrote:
Dave's is good. Another possibility is to crop the
left 60% and the right 20% and make it a vertical.
Rick
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4666.htm
That's what I'd do... Make it a vertical.
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
xx933.jpg and your altered version are both excellent, they have a
different feel but both are pleasant.
xx944.jpg and the altered version differ more: I think you went a bit
too far on that one and blew out the highlights. xx944.jpg is more
delicate and needs just a tiny bit of adjustment
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Yes, it's a standard blue jay.
Shel
Sorry, Shel. There is no standard jay. You might think of a Blue Jay
as standard because they are so common. This bird however is a Scrub
Jay. Notice it has no crest as Blue jays do and also it has the
brownish colored back.
I agree!
Jack
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Same here.
If you must use a lens condom, B+W multicoated clear optical glass
filters are what I'd recommend.
G
On Apr 9, 2007, at 5:25 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I use filters only for image modification. And with
In a message dated 4/8/2007 8:07:42 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not my usual stuff.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/before_coffee.html
Enjoy
William Robb
===
I don't know what it is, but it is definitely an interesting shot. Good
going.
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: Protection glass / filters
Why would a DSLR require different filters than used on a film camera?
Personally, I think the use of DSLR filters is hype and just a marketing
ploy.
DSLRs seem less forgiving of optical defects than
William Robb wrote:
Jester had a bit of surgery a couple of weeks ago.
I thought the disembodied head look to be a bit surreal.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/elizabethan_bug.html
looks like a fridge magnet
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML
Pretty. I prefer the second. BTW, it has a white spot near the upper left
that I would clone out. The first is fine, but a bit on the light side. More
midtone contrast might perk it up a tad more.
Both are nice.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
---
Hi,
I don't usually muck about
I have one BW filter that I might use if needed. But nowadays, with
digital, I no longer use filters on my lenses. I stopped using them when I
realized
the quality of the glass in a filter was less than the quality of glass in my
lenses (after I moved up to better lenses).
It is also why
Is he wearing an e-collar - oh, never mind, I see from the url that he
(probably) is.
Shel
William Robb wrote:
Jester had a bit of surgery a couple of weeks ago.
I thought the disembodied head look to be a bit surreal.
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 09/04/07, Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What protecting glass / UV filter brands do you use on DSLR.
I've good experience with Sigma UV EX DG (for digital). Hoya UV Pro1
Digital I recently purchased had hard dirt stuck to the glass from the
inner side that has
In a message dated 4/9/2007 3:58:21 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Title derived from the Newman painting :-)
Another daffodil, that was on our easter breakfast table ...
http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?id=229
Comments welcome!
Regards, JvW
Very
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Another attempt at the field of flowers type of thing. Different
location, different lens, same photographer. I'm curios whether you
think this one works better or worse than the previous one.
Pentax K10D, Tokina AT-X SD 400/5.6, Handheld
ISO 400, 1/250 sec @ f/11
Brendan, as a matter of habit I usually start with looking at the images
and then reading the story. I was just about to comment that your work
has very velviaesque quality in it, and then of course I read the story.
The bridge shots are cool indeed. Although I don't care much for the
flower
- Original Message -
From: Christian
Subject: Re: PESO: Funny Dog Picture
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/elizabethan_bug.html
looks like a fridge magnet
It's been tempting from time to time, but so far, I've resisted...
Thanks for looking
William Robb
--
BTW: http://www.robertstech.com/filters.htm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
No offense taken. Aren't the jays with the crest called Stellar (Steller?)
Jays?
The scrub jays around here seem to be our standard run-of-the-mill jay
LOL
Shel doing the backpeddle LOL
[Original Message]
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Yes, it's a standard blue
Bob, I think you did the right thing or almost the right thing.
However on the second image the curve brought out the little flare patch
just above and to the right from the weeds.
There may be different ways to treat the originals however. May be even
more towards the dark direction.
Boris
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO: Something different
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/before_coffee.html
===
I don't know what it is, but it is definitely an interesting shot. Good
going.
Thanks Marnie.
It's frost.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
No offense taken. Aren't the jays with the crest called Stellar (Steller?)
Jays?
(not my pictures)
Here's a Steller's Jay:
http://www.christinevadai.com/STJA4.jpg
A Blue Jay:
http://www.science.smith.edu/stopoverbirds/birdpixs/images/Blue%20Jay.jpg
And a Scrub Jay
Hmmm.
I posted the below message on April 6th having received no response as
of now. I almost feel like I did something quite wrong here...
*Sigh*
Boris
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
We've visited an exhibition called Galgalim 2007 (Wheels 2007). I am
mildly disappointed 'cause I expected
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: PESO: Funny Dog Picture
Is he wearing an e-collar - oh, never mind, I see from the url that he
(probably) is.
I'm not sure if Elizabethan is the proper name for them, I've seen them
referred to by that name.
The term e-collar
I don't recall ever seeing one of these, especially in the areas where
Bruce and I live.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Christian
A Blue Jay:
http://www.science.smith.edu/stopoverbirds/birdpixs/images/Blue%20Jay.jpg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
That's the only name I know them by. We use the term e-collar as a
shorthand. While e-collar may be used in training, I've not heard it
used here to any degree.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: 4/9/2007 7:48:49
Roman wrote:
What protecting glass / UV filter brands do you use on DSLR.
I've good experience with Sigma UV EX DG (for digital). Hoya UV Pro1
Digital I recently purchased had hard dirt stuck to the glass from the
inner side that has been contacting with porolone in the filter case, so
They're real common here. They can be noisy and mean. But they are
very colorful.
On 4/9/07, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't recall ever seeing one of these, especially in the areas where
Bruce and I live.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Christian
A Blue Jay:
In a message dated 4/8/2007 11:44:58 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another attempt at the field of flowers type of thing. Different
location, different lens, same photographer. I'm curios whether you
think this one works better or worse than the previous one.
Pentax
In a message dated 4/9/2007 7:52:15 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
No offense taken. Aren't the jays with the crest called Stellar
(Steller?)
Jays?
(not my pictures)
Here's a Steller's Jay:
http://www.christinevadai.com/STJA4.jpg
A Blue Jay:
No filters except polariser.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Boris, I saw your first post of this gallery, took a very quick spin thru
wasn't sufficiently interested to comment. - Sorry.
Personally I'm more likely to comment on a single image than an entire
gallery - I'm on dial up.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman
Bruce Dayton wrote:
I'd like some advice on how to crop this shot most effectively. Some
of the surroundings are probably nice to have and some not.
Pentax K10D, Tokina AT-X SD 400/5.6, Handheld
ISO 400, 1/750 sec @ f/5.6
Here is my take:
http://tinyurl.com/38d3ru
Incidentally, of all
Thanks for commenting Marnie!
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:43:03 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?id=229
Comments welcome!
Regards, JvW
Very pretty. But almost a tad too close for me. Uh, that doesn't make a lot
of sense. Hmmm, I think it would be
I stumbled over more in the same category
http://www.reuters.com/article/technology-media-telco-SP/idUST28593120070409
?pageNumber=1
I have no idea what this means, but the headline is Pentax stock jumps,
board split on Hoya merger.
Tim Typo
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Mark,
I took a quick scan of the filter size listing. If I may, a couple of
what may be exceptions.
My A*300 f2.8 ED(IF) takes a 49mm drop-in filter. My recently sold
28~80 f/3.5-4.5, a 58mm.
I realize that you may be only the publisher of this listing and take
no responsibility for its accuracy.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I don't recall ever seeing one of these, especially in the areas where
Bruce and I live.
A Blue Jay:
http://www.science.smith.edu/stopoverbirds/birdpixs/images/Blue%20Jay.jpg
:-) That's because they don't live in California! Hahahahaha What's
common to one person
It's very hard to present a gallery of images and get more than an
'attaboy' comment.
Of this set, the only snaps that caught my attention were the oddball
moto thing with two front wheels and the picture of two guys with
cell phones. The latter,
In a message dated 4/8/2007 9:13:08 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I suspect it's like anything else:
Supply has caught up with demand so vendors can no longer charge a
premium or MSRP for it. Street pricing at normal discounting now
rolls into place.
Godfrey
Hi Boris,
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 17:47:46 +0300, Boris Liberman wrote:
I posted the below message on April 6th having received no response as
of now. I almost feel like I did something quite wrong here...
I am not so into auto or motor shots, but I liked this one:
Yes, I know - they are more of an eastern species. Did a little research
after your first post. Curious that Marnie's seen them here
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: 4/9/2007 8:31:37 AM
Subject: Re: PESO -
Here's another vote for taking your lenses to a repair shop with a good
reputation. I have had California Precision Service here in Sacramento
(http://www.camrepair.com/) repair two SMC-A lenses. It turns out one
was my 200 A* macro, which did not properly interface to the camera when set
to
1 - 100 of 225 matches
Mail list logo