Hi
http://www.pbase.com/kiwibiologist/image/77040452
another from the same beach as Dog's on Holiday. Dusk was falling
fast but we lingered long enough for me to catch this moment - sea
spray, big waves, black sand, and this pair on their way home.
Rendered in B W using lightroom - maybe a
georgeous!
On 4/12/07, Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A lovely sunrise over lake Zurich got me a (natural) panorama made out of 5
photos.
I converted another raw single photo from the same series using Photomatix
to a somehow surreal scene. It would have been impossible for me to get
I think I would prefer the shot to be composed to have the roof not
cropped at the top of the frame - it would look more pleasing if the
top diagonal was more in balance with the bottom one in my opinion.
But a nice BW nevertheless
Alastair
On 4/12/07, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good thing his father didn't have the Summicron.
Paul
On Apr 11, 2007, at 10:37 AM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 12/04/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dunno. If I ever had a child, naming him/her Esse Uu See after
the Hasselblad SWC might get me a punch in the nose when
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/04/12 Thu AM 12:10:49 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT - ouch
mike wilson wrote:
William Robb wrote:
From: Rick Womer
Indeed. Cross them off the Liszt.
Bach to your cave, Womer.
You don't
Hi Cotty,
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:57:32 +0100, Cotty wrote:
I used a short loop of an old strap (much like Cotty I guess :-)
plus some non-scratching 'carabine' aluminium hooks:
http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?list=19
Sew those mothers on! Looks like it might come unhooked in a
Hello All Bob
yeah but look at the side of the truck in the last pic - they are
supposed to be *specialist* piano movers!!
that one sure got moved in a special way. They should have hired
Laurel and Hardy.
Bob
Sure, but unfortunately the number of these pianos really limited
while
From: Rod Connan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/04/12 Thu AM 02:14:58 GMT
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OT - ouch
I was simply amazed that they thought they could lower the hydraulic tray
with part of the piano still over the floor of the moving van.
If
At 03:34 PM 12/04/2007, Fiso_PENTAX wrote:
Hello All Bob
yeah but look at the side of the truck in the last pic - they are
supposed to be *specialist* piano movers!!
that one sure got moved in a special way. They should have hired
Laurel and Hardy.
Bob
Sure, but unfortunately
What about Shneider-Kreuznach ? =D
2007/4/11, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Good thing his father didn't have the Summicron.
Paul
On Apr 11, 2007, at 10:37 AM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 12/04/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dunno. If I ever had a child, naming
This company is based in Chiswick, where I used to live, and I hired them
to move a slightly less expensive piano a few years ago. No problem at
all.
The interesting thing is whether this will damage their reputation, or
bring them more business. The publicity (BBC, national newspapaers,
Yes, I see what you mean.
I'll have another go at photographing this building next time I'm in Sydney.
Thanks for commenting.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
Quoting Alastair Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think I would prefer the
mike wilson wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mike wilson wrote:
William Robb wrote:
From: Rick Womer
Indeed. Cross them off the Liszt.
Bach to your cave, Womer.
You don't have a good Handel on this stuff.
I don't know. It's probably only good for Chopin up
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/04/12 Thu PM 12:46:27 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT - ouch
mike wilson wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mike wilson wrote:
William Robb wrote:
From: Rick Womer
Markus Maurer wrote on Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:45:52 -0700
Sorry PDML members!
I'm really unable to reach Jim King privately since my mails get
bounced
back with an undefined network error:
Markus -
Your email message came through this time. No need to apologize for
the ones I didn't
Kurt Vonnegut has passed.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/books/12vonnegut.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
A local dude was selling his old film kit:
Pentax ZX-5
Tamron 28-200 zoom
Pentax FA 20mm f/2.8
..for $100. I was #2 to respond. Someone got a heck of a deal, but
sadly it wasn't quite ME. :-(
I didn't really want or need the body or the zoom, but a 20mm f2.8
would have been handy.
On 12/4/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Kurt Vonnegut has passed.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/books/12vonnegut.html
A milestone!
Sad news indeed.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
A sad day for everyone really...
On 4/12/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kurt Vonnegut has passed.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/books/12vonnegut.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
Boris
--
PDML
FYI,
Just got this split image RF screen
for my istDS ( should work in any
of the istD series cameras ) :
http://preview.tinyurl.com/yu25dy
works fine, nice clear split image
and a large microprism surround.
I dont think you can get this from
Pentax (yet?). Works easily to F4
on any lens I
I like it. Nice one.
Cheers,
Dave
On 4/13/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another from Yosemite.
A different way to look at Big Rocks.
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/treescreen.htm
Comments welcome.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Another from Yosemite.
A different way to look at Big Rocks.
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/treescreen.htm
Comments welcome.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[EMAIL
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Kurt Vonnegut has passed.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/books/12vonnegut.html
Here ya go, Paul:
http://www.drivingtheflies.com/?p=109
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Nice pictures you have there Markus.
I remember staying in Zurich for 8 hours waiting for a Swiss-Air
flight when we went to Thailand. I couldn't really see too much of the
city because I met my brother there, who traveled from France to meet
me (and his swiss girlfriend..) . I do remember the
Very nice, I like it
Toine
On 4/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another from Yosemite.
A different way to look at Big Rocks.
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/treescreen.htm
Comments welcome.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
**
Cool shot, aka. Your artistic sensibilities are starting to merge nicely
with photographic technology. Pretty soon Bill Robb will suggest that you
get a camera better suited to your vision ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A different way to look at Big Rocks.
I just received a marketing mail.
It's a about a book, the title translates to something like Practical
digital photography. I know it is a good book because I already have the
first edition. A few months after I bought it, a new revised much improved
edition came. Smart as I am I skipped that,
In a message dated 4/12/2007 8:09:59 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I like it. Nice one.
Cheers,
Dave
=
Thanks, Dave.
Marnie aka Doe
=
On 4/13/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another from Yosemite.
A different way to
On 12/4/07, Doug Brewer, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.drivingtheflies.com/?p=109
Beautiful, Doug.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[EMAIL
I like this one. You have taken a unique approach here and have
executed it very well.
Paul
On Apr 12, 2007, at 11:04 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another from Yosemite.
A different way to look at Big Rocks.
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/treescreen.htm
Comments
Excellent tribute. Beautifully written.
I too was launched on a somewhat directionless life voyage by
Vonnegut-think. I wonder how many wonderful sites I might have missed
had I not drifted haphazardly along.
Paul
Paul
On Apr 12, 2007, at 10:56 AM, Doug Brewer wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Ice Nine Publishing ... that's what the Grateful Dead used as their
name.
My brother (recording engineer and sound producer) tells me that Mr.
V was engaged at one of the studios he works with for books on tape
readings too, now and then.
A toast to his memory and the wonderful ideas and
On Apr 12, 2007, at 8:04 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another from Yosemite.
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/treescreen.htm
I like it a lot as a composition.
The tonal balance is a little off, however: the brightness of the
rocks in the background overwhelms the feeling of a
Nicely put Doug.
Doug Brewer wrote:
Here ya go, Paul:
http://www.drivingtheflies.com/?p=109
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
John, what about metering, notably center weighted and spot?
Thanks.
On 4/12/07, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI,
Just got this split image RF screen
for my istDS ( should work in any
of the istD series cameras ) :
http://preview.tinyurl.com/yu25dy
works fine, nice clear
Quite beautiful! I love it just the way it is. It strikes me as one that
you must print and enlarge.
I'm trying to think back on the photos you've displayed. This may be my
favorite.
Tom C.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Then again Sparx group seems to have a vested interest in Pentax getting
out of the Photography business, in fact any business. They wanted that
before Pentax's recent success in the DSLR market and like any group of
analysts they hate to be wrong. Sometimes so much so that they ignore
Yes and you should be ashamed of yourself.
Norm Baugher wrote:
Oh jeez, did I start this?
Norm
Mark Roberts wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
William Robb wrote:
From: Rick Womer
Indeed. Cross them off the Liszt.
Bach to
Certainly worth it for the lens alone. Ah well, there are other fish
in the pond...
G
On Apr 12, 2007, at 6:50 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
A local dude was selling his old film kit:
Pentax ZX-5
Tamron 28-200 zoom
Pentax FA 20mm f/2.8
..for $100. I was #2 to respond. Someone got
The real lyrics to Louie Louie, (or so I've been lead to believe).
Louie, Louie,
me gotta go.
Louie, Louie,
me gotta go.
A fine little girl, she wait for me;
me catch a ship across the sea.
I sailed the ship all alone;
I never think I'll make it home
Three nights and days we sailed the sea;
me
Well struck balance between the screening trees and the graduated
lighting of the rocks. Trees allow adequate definition of the
background, yet retain their identity against the less well lit
portion. Nice!
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another from Yosemite.
A different way to
Well seen executed.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - Tree Screen
Another from Yosemite.
A different way to look at Big Rocks.
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/treescreen.htm
Comments welcome.
Marnie aka Doe
Interesting idea, well captured, but the overall image just isn't
gripping enough. It might be better bigger.
Russell Kerstetter wrote:
http://www.avocadohead.com/piclinks/IMGP2959.html
There are several types of comments I am looking for:
1) The typical 'good, bad and ugly' comments as
Yep $100 was a great price for the 20mm, you could probably have gotten
twice that for the Zoom on e-bay.
Charles Robinson wrote:
A local dude was selling his old film kit:
Pentax ZX-5
Tamron 28-200 zoom
Pentax FA 20mm f/2.8
..for $100. I was #2 to respond. Someone got a heck of a
No problem with the lyrics as published, but you were never at a frat party
where The Kingsmen played...
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The real lyrics to Louie Louie, (or so I've been lead to believe).
[snip]
Seems like a fairly clean love song.
On 4/12/07, Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No problem with the lyrics as published, but you were never at a frat party
where The Kingsmen played...
You would be correct.
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: From a Recent Press Release...
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 13:21:00 -0400
Then again Sparx group seems to have a vested interest in Pentax getting
out
A friend is looking for decent quality lens with a 300mm tele
capability, at least. This is out of the range of my experience in
Pentax lenses.
Anyone worked with the FA-J75-300? or the Sigma 135-400? I know the
Sigma 50-500 has a big following, but it's pricier than he can
afford. The
The point is success to Sparx is not necessarily, in fact probably
isn't, success to Pentax. In fact in Sparx is better off if Pentax is
sold. That makes Sparx's predictions of Pentax's demise suspect. I'm
not saying that those predictions are wrong, but I'm considering the source.
Tom C
No, but I've been to frat parties...
Bob Blakely wrote:
No problem with the lyrics as published, but you were never at a frat party
where The Kingsmen played...
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The real lyrics to Louie Louie, (or so I've been lead to
On Apr 12, 2007, at 8:04 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/treescreen.htm
Followup:
It looks better on my big screen than it did on the laptop, but I
still think the middle tones tend to be a little too close together.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
In a message dated 4/12/2007 9:47:19 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quite beautiful! I love it just the way it is. It strikes me as one that
you must print and enlarge.
I'm trying to think back on the photos you've displayed. This may be my
favorite.
Tom C.
In a message dated 4/12/2007 8:54:57 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Cool shot, aka. Your artistic sensibilities are starting to merge nicely
with photographic technology. Pretty soon Bill Robb will suggest that you
get a camera better suited to your vision ;-))
Shel
Finally scanned in a couple of pictures I like. This was from my first
trip to the Amazon...
http://home.earthlink.net/~nbaugher/manaus.htm
Norm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 4/12/2007 10:57:45 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Apr 12, 2007, at 8:04 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/treescreen.htm
Followup:
It looks better on my big screen than it did on the laptop, but I
still
Hi,
After a long spell, I added new(old) stuff to the Pentax Gallery, most
were film shots. They were consistent rejected because of lack of
EXIF data blah blah blah ... even with the scanned... box ticked.
Most of my previous shots that were accepted were film photos--this
happening to anyone
In a message dated 4/12/2007 9:55:47 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well struck balance between the screening trees and the graduated
lighting of the rocks. Trees allow adequate definition of the
background, yet retain their identity against the less well lit
portion.
I like this shot. What do you think:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/456765816/
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database:
thanks walt!
G
On Apr 12, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Walter Hamler wrote:
I don't have it anymore, but I once owned the Sigma 70~300 APO
Super. The
latest Digital version is a little more expensive, but still very
affordable. I truly wonder what the diff is compared to the regular
version.
On Apr 12, 2007, at 11:09 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just used shadow/highlights on it to bring out the shadow
details, which
is a quicker fix and not necessarily the best for tonal
gradations. I was
aware the rock was light and the trees very dark, and that was a
situation I
I don't have it anymore, but I once owned the Sigma 70~300 APO Super. The
latest Digital version is a little more expensive, but still very
affordable. I truly wonder what the diff is compared to the regular version.
Anyway, I found it to be a VG to E+ lens, especially when factoring in
price.
We are off to the Battlefords for a dawg show.
I am showing Jester, the ADHD puppy, Charmi is showing Bella, the lovely
Walloon.
I will be back on Sunday, depending on how well we do, perhaps earlier than
later.
Have fun.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I downloaded the Beta some time back and basically liked what I saw.
However, I could never get it to print decent stuff. I wasn't willing to
chase driver problems, etc, so just deleted it and never looked backwards.
Now, with the positive reports I am reading everywhere, I am wondering if
Does anybody else have a PowerPC-based G5 iMac that
they have calibrated with a Huey?
What results do you get?
I get peculiar discolored posterized shadows; Pantone
has no idea why. The Huey works wonderfully on our
MacBook.
Rick
http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW
On Apr 12, 2007, at 11:21 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
I like this shot. What do you think:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/456765816/
Hmm. The color seems a little odd ... kinda flat somehow ... and I'm
not sure that the expression of the two boys is really the best.
Neither seem to be
Shot this in Joshua Tree National Monument, love that place. Pentax ME
Super SE.
http://home.earthlink.net/~nbaugher/joshuatree.htm
Norm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I had them analyze one of mine that got rejected that way. What they
told me was there was some exif data. If there is any exif data, then
they scan for pentax cameras in it. If they don't find it, they
reject. So what you really want to do with the scanned images is to
strip all exif data
Bill,
Good luck!
--
Bruce
Thursday, April 12, 2007, 11:44:21 AM, you wrote:
WR We are off to the Battlefords for a dawg show.
WR I am showing Jester, the ADHD puppy, Charmi is showing Bella, the lovely
WR Walloon.
WR I will be back on Sunday, depending on how well we do, perhaps earlier than
The beta was occasionally challenging in the Print module with regard
to setup and sizing. However, all of that seems to have been fully
sorted out ... I use it exclusively for my printing now and am
extremely happy with it.
I find it best in Lightroom, just as in Photoshop, to use a
On Apr 12, 2007, at 10:48, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Certainly worth it for the lens alone. Ah well, there are other fish
in the pond...
...and my wife had even bought into the the idea, too!
Ah well.
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minneapolis, MN
Woof, woo woo woof!
Woof
William Robb wrote:
We are off to the Battlefords for a dawg show.
I am showing Jester, the ADHD puppy, Charmi is showing Bella, the lovely
Walloon.
I will be back on Sunday, depending on how well we do, perhaps earlier than
later.
Have fun.
William Robb
I just stumbled over a load of short tutorials
http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/
What I've seen so far looks good.
Tim Typo
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: 12. april
I have no experience with that particular setup, but I and others
have seen various issues with the Pantone Huey and different system
configurations. Because of those issues, and similar issues with the
Spyder2 product, I generally recommend the Eye One Display 2 instead.
Godfrey
On Apr
Don't do anything you know I wouldn't do. Then you'll be ok.
Tim Typo
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: 12. april 2007 20:44
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: See ya later
Why would it make it suspect? They are the majority shareholder. Almost
all (if not all) shareholders are in it for primarily one thing - making
money.
If making the most amount of profit in the shortest amount of time is
Sparx's goal, it's also the goal of many other shareholders.
I'm not
In a message dated 4/12/2007 11:39:39 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd want to pull the highs down a little bit while separating and
expanding the tonal contrasts in the trees, bringing them up a notch
too. To me, this says a combination of curves adjustment
Dear Colleagues,
Thank you for sharing your experience and expertise.
I am new to D/SLR camera world (just 4 months) and hope that I could
increase my knowledge in photography.
I am working as disaster relief doctor and taking pictures would be a good
hobby after hard days in field.
I have two
On Apr 12, 2007, at 12:18 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
...
I would recommend
downloading the free trial and going through Michael Tapes' tutorial
videos to refresh your memory and understand the basics. They're
available at
http://www.rawworkflow.com/
...
I just stumbled over a load of short
Indeed. I was very sorry to hear that. I love his books. Even his less
well-known ones are full of gems. Galapagos was about an event which
killed all humans except for a small group of people who happened to
be on a tourist trip to the Galapagos. It traces their descendants
over a period of 2
Excellent. Very effective, and an original way of looking at a cliched
subject.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 April 2007 16:05
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - Tree Screen
It is big enough and bright enough for me. I think there is too much
sky that has nothing in it. So I would crop it a bit differently.
Take most of it off and go for a more square shot. With that kind of
crop, I think it would be a pretty good photo.
--
Bruce
Wednesday, April 11, 2007,
Thanks for the note on the FA-J 70-300!
I have two questions:
1. I want to buy a bag pack, which can hold my K10D, + 3 lenses
including,
Pentax 70-300mm, an external flash, tripod and laptop.
Which bag pack do you suggest?
If you are thinking a backpack style bag, the Lowepro CompuTrekker
It seems Pentax is/was/will be bit that much interested into a merger
but Urano was. It's not clear at all (yet) if Pentax (its
shareholders) are really interested in a merger or if Urano's proposal
was well why not after all.
2007/4/12, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Why would it make it suspect?
I rather like this one. Good concept!
--
Bruce
Thursday, April 12, 2007, 8:04:30 AM, you wrote:
Eac Another from Yosemite.
Eac A different way to look at Big Rocks.
Eac http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/treescreen.htm
Eac Comments welcome.
Eac Marnie aka Doe :-)
Well, it caught my eye. There is certainly a 'mood' to it. I like
the BW treatment and the elements that are in the shot.
Thanks for showing it.
--
Bruce
Wednesday, April 11, 2007, 11:40:07 PM, you wrote:
AR Hi
AR http://www.pbase.com/kiwibiologist/image/77040452
AR another from the same
Most technical photo books are very poor, and just an excuse for the
photographer to show off some of his pictures (they're almost all by
men).
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tim Øsleby
Sent: 12 April 2007 16:27
To:
Thanks Bill, Jack, Godders, Rick Markus, PJ and Bruce for your input.
Several of you commented that it is rather flat. I actually did do
that on purpose because, Rick you are correct, I was wanting it to be
moody and dreary. However, I guess I went too far :) Here is a
different take on it:
An excerpt from another report yesterday. It would appear to indicate that
Pentax et al. may not be opposed to a merger, they just changed their mind
regarding the conditions of the formerly proposed merger.
---
Watanuki, who was formerly a corporate vice president, also
It did 'til someone advised me to put the final jpg image through save
for the web. I've had no problems since.
Seems it clears the EXIF data.(?)
Jack
--- Bong Manayon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
After a long spell, I added new(old) stuff to the Pentax Gallery,
most
were film shots. They
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6548719.stm
Bone appetit!
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Hello Jens,
Kids and sports - tricky to shoot well. I like the 'pose' you
captured of them. What I struggle with is feeling like they are in a
game, rather than a practice. What contributes to that
is the great DOF allowing me to very clearly make out other fields and
goals. I would still
Godfrey,
Unfortunately, I don't have experience with either.
I've been using Tamron 70-300 4-5.6 LD/Macro that I bought
back in 1998. It is a reasonable lens. I found that the quality
of the photos is comparable to what I am getting with SMCP-F-70-210
in the same range of focal lengths.
It is
I didnt do any controlled testing if this screen has
any measurable change effect on metering, but so
far with program mode using A lenses, screw lenses
in AV mode, and PK/M lenses using stop down GB
method I am not noticing any differences visibly.
I use the centerweighted metering mode ususally.
Saw the headline news on the local student newspaper, didn't realize who he
was and
didn't read the article, until now. Now I know he taught a couple of years
at Iowa's
Writer's Workshop back in the '60s. I'll make sure to read some of his
books.
Yefei
-Original Message-
Date: Thu,
I think that's definitely a stronger photo. The square crop suits it
well, the larger size and tonal edits make it more than the prior
rendering. Good job!
G
On Apr 12, 2007, at 1:31 PM, Russell Kerstetter wrote:
Thanks Bill, Jack, Godders, Rick Markus, PJ and Bruce for your input.
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I didnt do any controlled testing if this screen has
any measurable change effect on metering, but so
far with program mode using A lenses, screw lenses
in AV mode, and PK/M lenses using stop down GB
method I am not noticing any differences
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:36:13 -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote
A friend is looking for decent quality lens with a 300mm tele
capability, at least. This is out of the range of my experience in
Pentax lenses.
Anyone worked with the FA-J75-300? or the Sigma 135-400? I know the
Sigma 50-500
I did not wonder at all.
Just thought you where your own thorough self ;-)
Tim Typo
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: 12. april 2007 21:54
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I see your point. But this guy isn't so bad. In fact it could be used as a
coffee table book. Not at a classy coffee table, but, you get the idea.
The thing that really caught my attention was the does not expire part. How
dumb do they think we are?
Tim Typo
Mostly harmless (just plain
Yes, this looks much better - I don't think you lost the feel you were
trying to convey.
--
Bruce
Thursday, April 12, 2007, 1:31:23 PM, you wrote:
RK Thanks Bill, Jack, Godders, Rick Markus, PJ and Bruce for your input.
RK Several of you commented that it is rather flat. I actually did do
RK
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
