On Apr 23, 2007, at 6:06 PM, AlexG wrote:
Pardon my ignorance?
Why do you say Photodo is misleading?
- Because I find the test results there inaccurate based upon my use
of lenses that they've tested.
- Because their graphs don't make much sense.
- Because people take their word as some kind
Hi Graywolf,
Maybe the appropriate definition is more versatile rather than better. I
think of digital as being far more versatile than film. More versatile means
there are more chances it can better suit someone's needs (about shooting
and editing pictures). That's my case for sure. For a
Hmmm
Sounds like just the tool for obsessive/compulsives
(Hey - that's me!)!!
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
Quoting David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
G'day All,
I came across a link to this little application and thought
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/04/24 Tue AM 01:48:52 GMT
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Another 85mm f2.0 SMC-M image - Fungi?
Heres a more conventional looking image
not showing any bokeh problems
I took with this lens today:
I'm jumping in without knowledge of preceeding messages on this thread
so forgive me if I'm repeating somone else's words.
I have this lens, even if I didn't use it (as the rest of my photo gear)
for a long time. My guess is that the simplicity of the lens design,
including only 5 optical
Lack of SSE2 (AthlonXP and previous and first generation Sempron but
also Intel Pentium 3) will be dead slow but... it works.
I used a trial of Lightroom (because I had nothing for this on my
parents computer) to convert about 50 photos I just took (RAW of
course) to Jpeg to put on a CD so they
On 24/04/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use coated filters, but my cleaning warning, as I'm sure you
understood, was for those who would do harm to the lens element
coatings.
I suspect that you severely underestimate the robustness of modern
lens coatings.
--
Rob Studdert
Reminds me of some shots by Moholy-Nagy. More room around the subjects
would be nice, but I guess that's nearly impossible, in S. Marco
Square...
A bit too contrasted for my taste, but the choice depends on the planned
use and/or personal taste.
Agree about cloning out the shadows in the lower
Nice.
I have heaps of shots of these things:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/IMGP3380.jpg
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/IMGP3363.jpg
(that sugary syrup tastes really nice)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/IMGP3354.jpg
And this should impress Mark, this one
Doug Franklin wrote:
Digital Image Studio wrote:
I suspect that you severely underestimate the robustness
of modern lens coatings.
I quit worrying so much about the robustness of the front element
coatings when I saw the Pentax demonstration of crushing out a cigarette
on the
Digital Image Studio wrote:
I suspect that you severely underestimate the robustness
of modern lens coatings.
I quit worrying so much about the robustness of the front element
coatings when I saw the Pentax demonstration of crushing out a cigarette
on the front element like it was an ashtray.
Maybe it's the impression you were going for, but the entire scene
appears to be overly bright. Always must add; at least, on my monitor.
Jack
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you're mistaking lack of detail from being mostly out of
focus,
with lack of detail from being
Thanks
I had to lighten the shadow in the one face a bit but the sun was very
harsh as you may imagine in the desert.:-)
Dave
On 4/24/07, Fernando Terrazzino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Dave,
Why is not a great picture? I like it very much, I have this feeling
that you capture the essence
Ahh yes. you did my trick, tho I also bent the little spring so the ball
wouldn't go back in properly.
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:41:26 +0200, Vic Mortelmans wrote:
First, to my own fault, I lost the little ball (what did you expect?).
Actually, I still have it, but it dropped into the inside of
I can only hope. ;)
Jack
--- Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24/04/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use coated filters, but my cleaning warning, as I'm sure you
understood, was for those who would do harm to the lens element
coatings.
I suspect that you
Yes, it's very high contrast, but that's fully intentional, for making the
subjects look like shadows and the shadows look like subjects. I was also
tempted to call that pic highshadows, as opposed to highlights ;-)
I agree those half-shadows on the bottom were disturbing, hence I've cloned
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Apr 23, 2007, at 6:06 PM, AlexG wrote:
Pardon my ignorance?
Why do you say Photodo is misleading?
- Because I find the test results there inaccurate based upon my use
of lenses that they've tested.
- Because their graphs don't make much sense.
- Because people take
On 24/04/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can only hope. ;)
Lifted directly from a post I made re lens cleaning Nov 2000:
In an except from the Leica Fotographie International magazine 6/99 page 37
the following can be found:
The resistance and adhesive power of the outer layer is so
On 24/04/07, Vic Mortelmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The better solution would then be to fix the lock button in pushed
position with some glue, thus getting rid of the lock 'feature' and
still keeping advantage of the position stop.
This is exactly what I did many many years ago.
--
Rob
Hello Dario! Nice pictures.
I did try some of that in the past. I think that the biggest problem,
given you don't have any technical problem (as a photographer, I mean)
is that the planes are usually rather far and thus saturation of the
images is less then optimal.
Airshows are usually held in
The definition is truly impressive. At what ISO and shutter speeds did
you shoot them?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dario Bonazza
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 12:24 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: GESO: Frecce Tricolori
This
Ran across this at cnn.com this morning. The first photo, by Margaret
Bourke-White, is very powerful in my opinion. There's also a color
photograph by St. Ansel.
http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/fortune/0704/gallery.f500_photos.fortune/index.html
--
Scott Loveless
www.twosixteen.com
--
Rob,
A few years ago I did something like that using a damaged SMC filter. I
couldn't see any scratches or abrasions, even when using a magnifier.
However, I did ruin a 20mm Super Tak by cleaning it with Kodak lens tissue.
although I couldn't see the scratches. When I brought the lens in for a
Very nice and very unusual! What do you think about a
little more contrast or saturation in the foreground?
Rick
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
About 1/10 mile from home I rounded the corner and
was treated to this.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5886737size=lg
Tom
Here it is using Juan's Googlemap thingie:
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=lESYwdjzwI
And, in case there are problems with that, here (it doesn't look so
good here, I don't think) on photo.net:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5868797
Comments welcome.
thanks,
frank
--
Wonderful shot, Dario! It is almost abstract.
Rick
--- Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it's very high contrast, but that's fully
intentional, for making the
subjects look like shadows and the shadows look like
subjects. I was also
tempted to call that pic highshadows, as
http://www.tipa.com/awa_2007.lasso
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
No, I don't care to run the test. (LoL)
Well, this gives me even more hope.
Jack
--- Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24/04/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can only hope. ;)
Lifted directly from a post I made re lens cleaning Nov 2000:
In an except from the
On 24/04/07, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob,
A few years ago I did something like that using a damaged SMC filter. I
couldn't see any scratches or abrasions, even when using a magnifier.
However, I did ruin a 20mm Super Tak by cleaning it with Kodak lens tissue.
although I
On 24/04/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I don't care to run the test. (LoL)
Well, this gives me even more hope.
Nearly 20 years of regular cleaning the front element of my A16/2.8
fisheye and later my A15/3.5 (both of which can't be protected using
a screw on filter) with all and
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I apologize,
MARK!
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
So far as you can tell.(?)
Jack
--- Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24/04/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I don't care to run the test. (LoL)
Well, this gives me even more hope.
Nearly 20 years of regular cleaning the front element of my A16/2.8
fisheye and
ISO 200 at 1/1000 sec. Tuly impressive definition? Would you like to see
some Venice rooftops taken from S.Marco tower with my DA 12-24 at 12mm? See
there:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/public/IMGP1653.jpg
Warning: 9 MB to download!
Sorry for the heavy watermark, but there are ongoing talks for
http://roman.blakout.net/r-rated/800x533-_IGP9160.jpg
Wish you lovely spring green time.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks for posting that Scott
These 2 really stood out to me:
http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/fortune/0704/gallery.f500_photos.fortune/2.html
http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/fortune/0704/gallery.f500_photos.fortune/13.html
Cheers,
Dave
On 4/24/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wrote:
ISO 200 at 1/1000 sec.
Answering Flavio's question, that's re. the planes, not the rooftops.
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks Rick I appreciate the feedback. As far as the foreground goes, to me
at least on my monitor, it looks pretty realistic as is.
Tom C.
From: Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Low
Thanks Jack, That's what I thought also. ;-)
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good thing you carry the D on your commute. Interesting bow
position together with a nicely lit and complimentary sky. The total
composition is well assembled.
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simplicity of design should make no real difference in Bokah.
Minelli Flavio wrote:
I'm jumping in without knowledge of preceeding messages on this thread
so forgive me if I'm repeating somone else's words.
I have this lens, even if I didn't use it (as the rest of my photo gear)
for a long
Scott Loveless wrote:
Ran across this at cnn.com this morning. The first photo, by Margaret
Bourke-White, is very powerful in my opinion. There's also a color
photograph by St. Ansel.
http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/fortune/0704/gallery.f500_photos.fortune/index.html
A classic. I saw a
Thibouille,
I'm not sure what you started, or what might be going on. Remember, I
completely filter at least one boob from my email universe entirely
so that it remains peaceful here. Noise like that isn't worth
expending any thought on.
Well.. as usual :'(
Yeah I will end doing the same.
David Savage wrote:
Thanks for posting that Scott
These 2 really stood out to me:
http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/fortune/0704/gallery.f500_photos.fo
rtune/2.html
Oh yeah! That one really stood out to me, too!
I wonder if it's a deliberate Lewis Hine homage? I can't imagine it
wasn't at
Just received my confirmation email for the Portrait and Lighting
course i registered for on Monday.
Its a bit of a drive to Georgian College in Barrie, but its summer, so
the Hwy 400 closures should be minimal. Only place i could fine a
class.
May 7 to June 12. I'll miss the one during GFM, but
Very natural, and the mood outweighs the technical deficiencies.
Cheers,
Dave
On 4/24/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is my response to Graywolf's challenge for a photo I wouldn't have
taken except for shooting digital I knew this was going to be out of
focus, and suffer from
I'm sorry, I don't hate any of my lenses that much...
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 24/04/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can only hope. ;)
Lifted directly from a post I made re lens cleaning Nov 2000:
In an except from the Leica Fotographie International magazine 6/99
Earthlink must not like me - Page not found in Firefox, Opera and IE.
I give up.
Maris
P. J. Alling wrote:
Once again, I tried the link here and it works fine. I was having
some
trouble connecting a while ago but that seems to have cleared up now.
Maris V. Lidaka Sr. wrote:
Page not
Hi Frank,
For the most part, I like the idea. The Asian woman in the background adds
a lot to the photo. Framing is a little too tight on the right, and the
slight tilt bothers me. Not enough to be real interesting, too much not to
be annoying.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: frank
On 4/24/07, AlexG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Call me crazy,
OK Crazy. I'm Dave!
Pleased to meet you.
Cheers,
Dave ;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Wow! I knew I was way behind, but I didn't realize HOW MUCH...
How do you rate this lens with regards to distortion?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dario Bonazza
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 4:28 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject:
Relatively high ISO I'd assume. Different worlds but the same really...
frank theriault wrote:
Here it is using Juan's Googlemap thingie:
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=lESYwdjzwI
And, in case there are problems with that, here (it doesn't look so
good here, I don't think) on
On 4/24/07, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Savage wrote:
This is what came to my mind:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/AS_DSv.jpg
I almost automatically thought of capillaries heart scans.
I know, weird huh?!
Cheers,
Dave
Not so weird , really the branches
Yes, back already from mini-trip. Didn't find many poppies, so came home.
Will be pretty busy over the next several weeks though. Anyway...
I took a trip last Fall, late, to Disneyland and to visit a cousin in LA. I
also met up with Keith from PDML for a few hours on the same trip.
I had
Sorry. Send me your IP address and I'll e-mail a complaint to customer
service.
Maris V. Lidaka Sr. wrote:
Earthlink must not like me - Page not found in Firefox, Opera and IE.
I give up.
Maris
P. J. Alling wrote:
Once again, I tried the link here and it works fine. I was having
On 4/24/07, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, just for the hell of it. The general opinion here is that digital is
better than film, so how about everyone posting a photo that they took
with digital that they feel they could not, or would not, have done with
film.
I have hundreds of shots
Frank, my faves are the last one and one before the last. They seem to
be quite alive to me.
Boris
frank theriault wrote:
Okay, I've posted a crapload today, but it's been a while, right?
I figure I'm entitled.
My buddy Tim Hamel has his own group, but like most jazz guys, plays
with
LOL!
frank theriault wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5868563
Comments always welcome!
cheers (and thanks),
frank
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 4/24/07, Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://roman.blakout.net/r-rated/800x533-_IGP9160.jpg
Wish you lovely spring green time.
Thanks, but it's heading on to winter here. :-)
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I may be not in the proper mood, but to me it does not look particularly
attractive or interesting. This seems to be very good example of
excellent technique, but beside that, it does not touch me.
Hope you don't mind.
Boris
Brendan MacRae wrote:
Taken the other day when I was trying to
Fascinating. I read just a few of the comments and they seem negative.
Me is totally different story. I really *like* this photo. I cannot say
why really. I just feel captivated.
Boris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recap: I showed the side of my great grandfather's homestead (California
gold
Soon as I saw the shot, I wanted to go home. ;-)
Optio did good!
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, back already from mini-trip. Didn't find many poppies, so came
home.
Will be pretty busy over the next several weeks though. Anyway...
I took a trip last Fall, late, to Disneyland and
Fascinating indeed. Way cool. I wish I had a box of photos such as this
one ;-).
Boris
Christian wrote:
My dad in his darkroom (self portraits) somewhere around 1957 (he was
22ish).
http://links.pictures.aol.com/pic/af70brGLOS2f4K3nV1HBLLFUs9l88ejHd9dRv4xQp5Fd3Ig=_f.jpg
Hi frank,
I like the concept. I know that you don't have PC @ home, but I like
it better in BW, the boy and the woman's clothing renders to black
making it contrast with the rest of the scene (or maybe I'm nostalgic
of Frank's BW stuff ;-) ). The framing looks good to me.
Cheers
Fernando
On
Alex, not to dissuade you in any way, however it seems to me you got
distracted why taking the shot. It feels almost like you set out to
photograph the peaches but then saw something else, the spoons or the
vessel where the peaches are and then finally someone pushed your hand a
bit too far to
Hi Juan,
Nice selection. I've already seen most of them in your website. I'm
just wondering, when you decide on how to order these photos in your
book, do you use some system? like select the ones you consider
better and scatter them between the others or just sort them
chronologically. Just
Thanks Dario!
http://www.tipa.com/awa_2007.lasso
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I think more emphasis should be put on the stop sign ;-).
Boris
P. J. Alling wrote:
Yet another PESO, (at least something here is on topic today).
Photographed in their natural habitat, a bit early in the season though...
And there was light, and G-d thrown the light, day was good... (Hope I
did not mess up the translation...)
Coolio.
Boris
Tom C wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5885529
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
That is very cool. I couldn't find anything on the TIPA site specifying the
cameras they compared in the expert class, but I would imagine it may have
included the D80 or D200, 30D, Fuji S5 and other cameras in the ~$1000-$2000US
range. High praise indeed.
On the other hand, the Best
You seem to be getting back to your usual self, Frank.
Good stuff!!!
;-).
Boris
frank theriault wrote:
Here it is using Juan's Googlemap thingie:
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=lESYwdjzwI
And, in case there are problems with that, here (it doesn't look so
good here, I don't
Ralf, this is one of your stronger works. I say so because usually you
show us a techno-nocturnal image of some isolated plant. Here there is
this fusion between the plant and the street below it. It makes me want
to stand before the big print and just look, look, and look into it.
Boris
It's my opinion. You don't have to agree with me.
MARK !
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: lens tests (Pentax and others as well)
On Apr 23, 2007, at 6:06 PM, AlexG wrote:
Pardon my ignorance?
Why do you say Photodo is
Never saw a bow that low...
;-)
Boris
Tom C wrote:
About 1/10 mile from home I rounded the corner and was treated to this.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5886737size=lg
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
It sure works for me. Excellent, Dario.
Boris
Dario Bonazza wrote:
Taken from the S.Marco tower in Venice, looking down at the passers-by in
S.Marco Square:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/misc/misc18e.htm
Apart from the obvious increased contrast and BW conversion, the picture has
been
In a message dated 4/24/2007 9:05:18 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fascinating. I read just a few of the comments and they seem negative.
Me is totally different story. I really *like* this photo. I cannot say
why really. I just feel captivated.
Boris
===
I'd had never wasted film on this one ;-)
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=470866780size=o
On 4/23/07, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, just for the hell of it. The general opinion here is that digital is
better than film, so how about everyone posting a photo that they took
with
You most definitely succeeded. Surreal indeed. Let me tell you that this
one seems to be just a bit stronger than your other works.
Boris
Godfrey.Christian wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I was out for my Saturday morning walk in Guadalupe River Park, San
Jose, this time carrying camera
Hi,
I like this one Tom, composition and colors. I agree with Rick, a
version with more contrast might look good too.
Fernando
On 4/24/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very nice and very unusual! What do you think about a
little more contrast or saturation in the foreground?
Rick
Godfrey, may I suggest that you add a bit of vignetting to this image.
It seems to really ask for some probably even heavy vignetting.
Boris
Christian wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Another from my walk in the park this past Saturday, adding to the
Tree collection I've been building:
(in a stuttering kind of voice, a-la Harry Potter's first movie hero)
Fascinatingly sharp subject.
Boris
Walter Hamler wrote:
This guy was very tame and allowed me pretty close with the 100mm f3.5
Macro. iso 400, f/10, around 1/60th with SR on. His head is slightly soft or
else he moved.
I have been doing some shooting with this set up, the last 2 weeks or so.
Its pretty neat. My only concern is on very sunny days, like in Vegas,
it was hard to see if the setting i had for Tv and Av were blinking or
not.
But thats my only complaint. It seems to give a pretty go exposure to.
Loved those Paris shots Ann.
On 4/23/07, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Toine wrote:
Digital isn't better than film.It's a lot easier and in theory
cheaper. In fact thanks to digital I started shooting again. The dark
room was a disaster and shooting color pos. or neg. was even
I took the kids to Disneyworld many, many years ago - didn't even go on one
ride: I let the kids do their waiting and riding. They didn't seemed to
mind.
The Optio is good - I have the Optio 555 and it, too, does well. Saving for
the Pentax K10D meanwhile.
Maris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As soon as you mentioned tripod and planes, i had a funny feeling i
new what you'd be up to.:-)
I like this one.
Almost an IR effect, in the trees and i like the hydro lines there.
Dave
On 4/23/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was out for my Saturday morning walk in Guadalupe
On 4/21/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That should be realms not helms, (damned spell checker).
NelsonHa Ha/Nelson
Dave
P. J. Alling wrote:
These proud birds used to be hatched in Connecticut, USA, then migrate
through out the world. Somehow their nesting grounds have moved to
Someone has way too much time on their hands.
David Savage wrote:
On 4/24/07, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, just for the hell of it. The general opinion here is that digital is
better than film, so how about everyone posting a photo that they took
with digital that they feel they
Sounds cool! I'm just about decided to sign up for the second stage
of the Professional Practice for Exhibiting Artists course I took
last year. It concentrates on learning how to promote and manage
artist-business relationships with galleries, publications, etc.
Fun stuff, eh? A course on
I was going to mention that until I remembered the Epson RD-1s. Still
available I believe.
Scott Loveless wrote:
That is very cool. I couldn't find anything on the TIPA site specifying the
cameras they compared in the expert class, but I would imagine it may have
included the D80 or D200,
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Sclessin seen from the top of an old mine dump.
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/8689239
Very interesting. Almost three photos presented as one, and it works
beautifully.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hi guys
I've been trying remote control mode in the FN menu, I have AF in remote mode
enabled in the custom menu, using FA lenses. Using the Pentax remote or a
universal long range one I cannot get the camera to AF before taking the
shot, am I missing something? Is the camera faulty? I don't
- Original Message -
From: John Whittingham
Subject: K10D..no AF in remote mode!
Hi guys
I've been trying remote control mode in the FN menu, I have AF in remote
mode
enabled in the custom menu, using FA lenses. Using the Pentax remote or a
universal long range one I cannot
I quite like it too, Boris, so you're not alone :-)
Wendy
On 4/24/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fascinating. I read just a few of the comments and they seem negative.
Me is totally different story. I really *like* this photo. I cannot say
why really. I just feel captivated.
I don't think it's in production anymore. Besides, TIPA isn't going to give a
2007 award to to a 3 year old digital rangefinder any more than they would give
one to an *istD. So I'm sticking by my Leica Award theory. g
--
Scott Loveless
www.twosixteen.com/
-- Original message
Yes, but think of the hours of endless pleasure he gives us all.
I think he is a national treasure who should be preserved for all time.
Shall I order a tank and some formaldehyde?
Peter
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Re: Another gem from
I got the info from a friend of a friend, who took it last fall.
Its apparently a layed back approach.
Instructor basically asked what they wanted to try, instead of a
structure lesson.
Sounds like we can experiment quite a bit.
Once i feel comfortable with it, and get the basics down., I'll
There's something quite subtle and humorous about this one, frank.
I also think it would render better as monochrome, but it's darn neat
as is.
The googlemap display worked well.
G
On Apr 24, 2007, at 6:57 AM, frank theriault wrote:
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=lESYwdjzwI
Dumb question, you do have the AF switched on don't you?
William Robb
Hi William
Yes switched on, but in C-AF (continuous), could that be causing it? I'm away
from the camera right now.
John
On 4/20/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yet another PESO, (at least something here is on topic today).
Photographed in their natural habitat, a bit early in the season though...
http://home.earthlink.net/~morephotos/PESO_--_flamingosonparade.html
What's with the neckties?
cheers,
On Apr 24, 2007, at 10:43 AM, John Whittingham wrote:
I've been trying remote control mode in the FN menu, I have AF in
remote mode
enabled in the custom menu, using FA lenses. Using the Pentax
remote or a
universal long range one I cannot get the camera to AF before
taking the
shot,
Hi!
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=17401full=1
I thought I might call it An optical formula ;-).
Have your honest and brutal say, please.
Thanks.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
That is my sentiment as well.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, April 24, 2007, 11:29:39 AM, you wrote:
GD very striking, I like it.
GD I'd rather it were right side up, however. With only that change it
GD becomes stronger.
GD Godfrey
GD On Apr 23, 2007, at 3:29 PM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Taken from the
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
