It was unavailable at 12:01.I came back at about 3:00am, and it
downloaded pretty quickly.
Back to bed, before I fall over.
Cheers
Beaker
On May 1, 2007, at 1:07 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
I just tried to get to the site and it said it is temporarily
unavailable. I wonder if it is
On 30/4/07, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
So apparently there is a big event of some kind in North Carolina at the
beginning of June. So big in fact that Cotty is flying over from
England to attend.
In honor of his arrival in DC on Wednesday, May 30, the DCPDML will meet
at the
On 1/5/07, AvK, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hi folks,
the May PUG is open, it can be viewed at
http://pug.komkon.org
Have Fun, nice bunch of flowers.
Very nice selection. Boris' shot 'Field of Flowers' does it for me. Excellent.
Thanks Addy.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
For when you awaken - good for you! Congratulations.
Maris
Beaker wrote:
It was unavailable at 12:01. I came back at about 3:00am, and it
downloaded pretty quickly.
Back to bed, before I fall over.
Cheers
Beaker
On May 1, 2007, at 1:07 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
I just tried to get to
Hi Marnie
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:53:33 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I am still going for good composition and somewhat good looking over
all.
:-)
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/wetlands1.htm
I like it, it looks a bit dull on my laptop, but I am sure it will
be much better
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/04/30 Mon PM 04:14:58 GMT
snipplain matte fresnelsnip
I'm not sure what you mean by this. Fresnel lenses and matte screens are two
different things. I know that some cameras used Fresnel instead of normal
lenses under the screens for
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott Loveless)
Date: 2007/04/30 Mon PM 06:09:01 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: OT - the sun
Would someone in the UK kindly ring the Sun and tell them to update the page3
photos? They've had the same one on their home page for three
Thanks, Cotty.
Very nice selection. Boris' shot 'Field of Flowers' does it for me. Excellent.
Thanks Addy.
--
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks Adelheid,
Great job done, as always ...
Regards, JvW
On Tue, 01 May 2007 00:04:47 +0200, AvK wrote:
the May PUG is open, it can be viewed at
http://pug.komkon.org
Have Fun, nice bunch of flowers.
Indeed, cherries seem to be in the majority :-)
Regards, JvW
From: Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Overall - it was a pretty interesting experience. I always imagined
judges looking at my photos like I look at them - pouring over them for
a long time, looking at the nuance and detail. I should of put 2 + 2
together - when you consider the numbers
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We are supposed to do a project and the class culminates in a little show.
It's hard to explain my project, but it's sort of the intersection between
man-made and nature in my area. Or ecological landscapes, or environmental
landscapes, such as landscapes in
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/05/01 Tue AM 02:09:49 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO - Log
Another in the environmental landscape (landscape in context) series
mentioned previously.
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/log.htm
Comments welcome.
I'm spotting a
I have a pentax MZ-50 and I want to use it with my old non autofocus K lens.
When I mount them the aperture is set to the max, and I can't read the
exposure correcly.
I would like to do a stop-down exposure read of the scene, but I don't know if
it's possible. Is there any ring adapter that
On 4/30/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I even switched on JavaScript, which I only do in exceptional
circumstances, and got nada (using Firefox 2.0). They're probably
requiring even more plug-ins or something. They can go themselves.
(I'm in a bad mood today as I just
I have a pentax MZ-50 and I want to use it with my old non autofocus K lens.
When I mount them the aperture is set to the max, and I can't read the
exposure correcly.
I would like to do a stop-down exposure read of the scene, but I don't know if
it's possible. Is there any ring adapter that
No the MZ-50 is completely incomputable with the original K mount lenses.
Alessandro Ronchi wrote:
I have a pentax MZ-50 and I want to use it with my old non autofocus K lens.
When I mount them the aperture is set to the max, and I can't read the
exposure correcly.
I would like to do a
On 4/28/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27/4/07, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
G'day All,
For those of you who might be interested in what it is I do for a
crust, or if you like ships, you might find these 5 shots interesting:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
It's odd that you would see this pattern when using Takumars
(presumably M42 screw mount?) stopped down in Av mode. The camera
body knows nothing at all of the lens opening in those cases and
should be responding to the light as if the lens were
In a message dated 5/1/2007 3:07:25 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm spotting a theme here - but maybe not the one you want. Do you have
non-hazy days in California? Or is it possible to get to a site when there is
little, if any, background haze? I think the
In a message dated 5/1/2007 12:42:43 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I like it, it looks a bit dull on my laptop, but I am sure it will
be much better on my calibrated iMac :-)
===
Well, it is in a dull area. I have already bumped up the saturation a bit.
Not
I'm looking for a bag that will accommodate a laptop
or a binder of papers as well as camera stuff, and
this one looks pretty good.
None of the descriptions mention dividers for the main
compartment. Are they available, or does stuff just
rattle around in there? Individual cases for lenses
are
On May 1, 2007, at 12:43 AM, mike wilson wrote:
snipplain matte fresnelsnip
I'm not sure what you mean by this. Fresnel lenses and matte
screens are two different things. I know that some cameras used
Fresnel instead of normal lenses under the screens for various
reasons. Is that
This is about the best angle I could get on this. Brightness and Contrast
have been bumped up.
Still working on it.
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/oak.htm
Comments welcome.
Marnie aka Doe
-
Warning: I am now filtering my email,
Same series. The two PESOs today editorialize.
I don't think this is quite as strong as I hoped, but I could only stand in
the middle of the road for so long. I am also not sure the BW conversion is
quite what I want.
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/stop.htm
Comments
ouch!!!
On 4/30/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or: I thought I had room
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=jGGBdePISt
Comments always welcome.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/05/01 Tue PM 01:38:24 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Log
In a message dated 5/1/2007 3:07:25 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm spotting a theme here - but maybe not the one you want. Do you have
non-hazy days
Mark Roberts wrote:
I even switched on JavaScript, which I only do in exceptional
circumstances, and got nada (using Firefox 2.0). They're probably
requiring even more plug-ins or something. They can go
themselves.
I don't know what problem you're running into. Safari and FireFox
Funny ;-)
On 4/30/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A local headshop:
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=r5DHpi2sc6
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Interesting photo Ralf. I like it.
On 4/29/07, Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/8747755
As always, your comments and suggestions... :-)
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage:
It doesn't really work for me compositionally.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is about the best angle I could get on this. Brightness and Contrast
have been bumped up.
Still working on it.
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/oak.htm
Comments welcome.
Marnie aka Doe
On May 1, 2007, at 6:32 AM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
Some folks have told me that replacing the focusing screen with a
Pentax *ist DS focusing screen solved the problem. I might give that
a try when I get a moment. I tried switching my custom Katz Eye
screen from the DS into the K10D but found
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Same series. The two PESOs today editorialize.
I don't think this is quite as strong as I hoped, but I could only stand in
the middle of the road for so long. I am also not sure the BW conversion is
quite what I want.
In a message dated 5/1/2007 7:34:28 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It doesn't really work for me compositionally.
=
It was really hard to line up right. I may have to try again.
Thanks for the input.
Marnie aka Doe
In a message dated 5/1/2007 7:19:11 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The haze is OK but, for me, it reduces the contrast between the different
subjects. Not only in the literal sense. The common conception for this type
of shot is for it to be rather dramatic - are
frank theriault wrote:
A local headshop:
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=r5DHpi2sc6
;-)
cheers,
frank
From a conversation heard just after opening time, but the door's still
locked.
C'mon guys, it's Frank! Open the door.
Frank's not here, man.
Wonderful photo.
--
Scott
In a message dated 5/1/2007 7:31:17 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Same series. The two PESOs today editorialize.
I don't think this is quite as strong as I hoped, but I could only stand
in
the middle of the road for so long. I am also
Tenba's page for the bag suggests pockets and compartments
provided ... I've never seen a Tenba photo bag delivered without a
bunch of velcro dividers.
http://www.tenba.com/pc-536-6-messenger-bag-pm-17c.aspx
Another bag that might do for you is the Timbuk2 Commute, but I know
that you need
There was enough of a consensus that this was too dark. So here's
another try. I bumped up the mid tones then darkened the sky a bit.
Then applied the BW conversion, this time with a red filter. I applied
a faux grain layer, (which I find works a bit like pre-flashing film,
anyone else
mike wilson wrote:
From: Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Overall - it was a pretty interesting experience. I always imagined
judges looking at my photos like I look at them - pouring over them for
a long time, looking at the nuance and detail. I should of put 2 + 2
together - when you
- Original Message -
From:
Subject: Re: Judging Photos
I think he means that with the switch to digital, the average photographer
has become more concerned with technical perfection. I believe that this is
generally true. With film, only those who did their own darkroom work had
Like it. Says something about the disorder of nature.
Well rendered!
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is about the best angle I could get on this. Brightness and
Contrast
have been bumped up.
Still working on it.
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/oak.htm
Comments
I think he means that with the switch to digital, the average photographer has
become more concerned with technical perfection. I believe that this is
generally true. With film, only those who did their own darkroom work had
absolute control. Now nearly all advanced photographers can take
Prefer the original. More imposing..(?)
Jack
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was enough of a consensus that this was too dark. So here's
another try. I bumped up the mid tones then darkened the sky a bit.
Then applied the BW conversion, this time with a red filter. I
Almost an IR effect to it.
I like the brick or stone patterns of the building
Dave
On 4/30/07, Mark Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Got a little time to play today, so I went down to Sacred Heart Church in
East Sacramento. The church is a really nice example of local brick
architecture
Seems rather flat. Maybe a nudge of contrast..or messing with curves?
Stop development(?)
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Same series. The two PESOs today editorialize.
I don't think this is quite as strong as I hoped, but I could only
stand in
the middle of the road for so long. I
I really like how the dark edges seem to move down the hill and into
the valley and the buildings.
The fog/mist/smog looks great
Dave
On 4/28/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was in San Francisco early this morning, climbed the hill to Twin
Peaks and captured this view ...
In a message dated 5/1/2007 8:15:43 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Like it. Says something about the disorder of nature.
Well rendered!
Jack
Thanks! I had to aim for the top end because there were houses and other
junk at the bottom and I wanted a simple
Rick,
Just remembered:
Another line of bags that might be of interest to you are the Think
Tank Urban Disguise models.
http://www.thinktankphoto.com/ttp_product_UrbnDsgs2.php
The two largest models are equipped for laptop carrying as well as a
good bit of SLR gear.
Godfrey
On May 1, 2007,
IOW, 'geek challenged'. ;)
Jack
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From:
Subject: Re: Judging Photos
I think he means that with the switch to digital, the average
photographer
has become more concerned with technical perfection. I believe that
In a message dated 5/1/2007 8:15:36 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Seems rather flat. Maybe a nudge of contrast..or messing with curves?
Stop development(?)
Jack
Well, stop building right up to Mt. Diablo anyway. Which will be clear from
other photos.
Okey,
Agreed
Dave
On 5/1/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Prefer the original. More imposing..(?)
Jack
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was enough of a consensus that this was too dark. So here's
another try. I bumped up the mid tones then darkened the sky a bit.
I like it, but i think all of the wires takes a way from it.
I like the way your going in your series.
Dave
On 5/1/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is about the best angle I could get on this. Brightness and Contrast
have been bumped up.
Still working on it.
Composition and colour is nice.
Pleasing background.
Nice.
Our's are still a week away here in town.
Dave
On 4/29/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A beautiful spring day in Michigan. My tulips are popping out all
over. Grace is pleased.
Paul
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I never liked microprism focusing aids very much. The Pentax
Spotmatic had a good viewfinder, regardless, although not quite as
good as the Nikon F I bought in 1969, which had a type A screen as
standard (plain matte fresnel with central
Has anyone had a photo on hold in the Pentax gallery and if so did
you ever find out why ? I have a photo on hold at this time..Thanks Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 5/1/2007 8:30:12 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I like it, but i think all of the wires takes a way from it.
I like the way your going in your series.
Dave
==
Thanks, Dave. I am actually thinking of cloning out the telephone pole and
Thanks Dave. Yes, I would guess that spring is a week later up there, probably
two weeks later in Wheatfield's neighborhood
Paul
-- Original message --
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Composition and colour is nice.
Pleasing background.
Nice.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I think he means that with the switch to digital, the average photographer
has become more concerned with technical perfection. I believe that this
is generally true. With film, only those who did their own darkroom work
had absolute control. Now nearly all advanced
On 5/1/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From a conversation heard just after opening time, but the door's still
locked.
C'mon guys, it's Frank! Open the door.
Frank's not here, man.
Hey, Man,
I don't do that shit anymore...
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois
Of the first three, this one i like the best.
Really tells the story your after.
Dave
On 5/1/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Same series. The two PESOs today editorialize.
I don't think this is quite as strong as I hoped, but I could only stand in
the middle of the road for
Actually, I just unearthed some very critical comments
via Google that say that the Tenba bag has no dividers
and is lined with slick nylon that nothing will grip.
So, I'm thinking about the Domke J803 instead.
Rick
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tenba's page for the bag
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think he means that with the switch to digital, the average
photographer has become more concerned with technical perfection. I
believe that this is generally true.
I certainly don't. A few geeks? Yes. Tha average photographer? Nah.
From what I've seen in judging
There is a very silly conversation that just occured in the Yahoo *istD
group. I've omitted the names to protect the innocent.
QUESTION: OK let me preface this by saying that I know I could probably get
the
answer by reading my user manual. However... I have 3 kids uner 5 and
they have not
Thanks to all who commented, and specially to Paul who kicked me into doing
another rendering.
Tim Typo
Mostly Hairless
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 7:28 PM
Subject: Re: PESO -
On 5/1/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a very silly conversation that just occured in the Yahoo *istD
group. I've omitted the names to protect the innocent.
QUESTION: OK let me preface this by saying that I know I could probably get
the
answer by reading my user manual.
Mark Cassino wrote:
snip
After judging the GFM Nature Photography Weekend contest with Doug
Brewer for several years, I can definitely emphasize here. It's a
pretty intense experience.
Last year was the contest's first Digital year and to my surprise (and
I think to Doug's as well), the
This is the best of the ones you've shown today, composition-wise, IMO. Not
a wall-hanger, but it's a pleasing composition. Makes me think of a picture
in a Driver's Ed manual.
Just a thought... I don't have time to think of how to say it in a more
politically correct way... it's not bad
Good for you Dave :-)
Tim Typo
Mostly Harmless
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discuss pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 5:56 PM
Subject: Some good news regarding lost horse shows
Hay gang.:-)
Just found out, that the two big shows
On 4/28/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim, you've been holding out on us! Look it's Daffy!
Duck season, wabbit season.
Dave
*http://tinyurl.com/322x5w
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada
--
PDML
The J803 is too small for anything but a very small laptop. Even the
F802 is tight for an Apple PowerBook 15 and leaves little room for
gear once you put a laptop into its pocket.
Look at the Urban Disguise bags. Another possibility is a Crumpler
messenger bag ... they have some photo
Yes, several times. It usually means that the first round decision to
keep or not could not be made. There is more than one person involved
in the decision and they would like some collaboration. It is better
than an outright rejection, but still undecided. Eventually, it will
be revisited by
frank theriault wrote:
On 4/30/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I even switched on JavaScript, which I only do in exceptional
circumstances, and got nada (using Firefox 2.0). They're probably
requiring even more plug-ins or something. They can go themselves.
(I'm in a bad mood
Yes. Carolyn explained that she was planning to bring someone else in
to help her make a decision about it. Was delined soon after.
Jack
--- J [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone had a photo on hold in the Pentax gallery and if so did
you ever find out why ? I have a photo on hold at this
Don't trust him frank it's a trick, he just wants to steal the secrets
of theriaultian photography...
Mark Roberts wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
On 4/30/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I even switched on JavaScript, which I only do in exceptional
circumstances, and got
This one I do get. Certainly being familiar with the area and the
beautiful rolling hills with the occasional oak on the hillside, this
shot screams of man taking over. Nice shot.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, May 1, 2007, 7:14:08 AM, you wrote:
Eac This is about the best angle I could get on this.
I like this shot with the rail separating the foreground and
background. The haze helps strengthen the image of the mothball
fleet. I really wish I could see more of the fleet, though.
For me the shot is almost there - just a bit more of the fleet and if
possible, more birds to emphasize the
...I've asked five or seven members of this bunch, known for their
involvement/interest in street photography, to help me choosing some BW
pictures out of 25 entries for a mini-exhibit at Pentax Day next May 20.
Sadly, one week later I've only got one useful reply (thank-you, Juan). Sure
I've
This one I don't quite get, unless you are trying to show subdivisions
encroaching into the hills.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, May 1, 2007, 7:11:07 AM, you wrote:
Eac Same series. The two PESOs today editorialize.
Eac I don't think this is quite as strong as I hoped, but I could only stand
in
Eac
In a message dated 5/1/2007 9:20:22 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This one I do get. Certainly being familiar with the area and the
beautiful rolling hills with the occasional oak on the hillside, this
shot screams of man taking over. Nice shot.
--
Bruce
In a message dated 5/1/2007 9:09:11 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I see that often here on the list and elsewhere. Photography for
photography's sake is often disappointing.
Tom C.
===
However, this is my passion. And it's not just anti-development, per se.
But I take your comments to mean you found my first two photos rather
lackluster. That's fine. :-)
Later, Marnie aka Doe
No, it's just that whether a photo excites me, you, anybody, is usually
based solely on one's tastes and preferences which are as individual as we
ourselves are.
I
In a message dated 5/1/2007 9:35:09 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This one I don't quite get, unless you are trying to show subdivisions
encroaching into the hills.
--
Bruce
==
Yeah, basically.
What annoys me, personally, is that although Mt. Diablo is a
On 5/1/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't trust him frank it's a trick, he just wants to steal the secrets
of theriaultian photography...
Yes, I've noticed that Mark does tend towards extreme sharpness and
fine composition.
He's undoubtedly looking for that extra edge to set him
I'm glad to see that digital does motion blur, OOF blur and dynamic
tilt just as well as film!
;-)
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=ISuB53uBVA
Comments always welcome.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 1/5/07, Rick Womer, discombobulated, unleashed:
So, I'm thinking about the Domke J803 instead.
I nearly had that one! I've got the F-803 by mistake but decided to keep it.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
My Katz Eye screen is a plain matte fresnel surface without metering
aids, a custom design for scribed lines.
Yes, I talked with Rachel Katz about the problem I was seeing at
length. Her take on it is that Pentax reshaped the scatter of the
screen for the K10D model to provide more
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think he means that with the switch to digital, the average photographer
has become more concerned with technical perfection. I believe that this is
generally true. With film, only those who did their own darkroom work had
absolute control. Now nearly all advanced
On 1/5/07, Dario Bonazza, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sadly, one week later I've only got one useful reply (thank-you, Juan). Sure
I've done something wrong when asking that favour, as I don't think that
simply rating 25 pictures is too heavy a task for anyone contributing daily
to the list.
On 5/1/07, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/stop.htm
Actually, this is my favorite of the series. I find it very strong in
the way it portrays encroachment of development. The BW conversion is
very pleasing to me.
Christian pretty much summed
Very good example of effective blur.
Good on ya, Frank.
-Brendan
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm glad to see that digital does motion blur, OOF
blur and dynamic
tilt just as well as film!
;-)
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=ISuB53uBVA
Comments always
In a message dated 5/1/2007 9:50:33 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, it's just that whether a photo excites me, you, anybody, is usually
based solely on one's tastes and preferences which are as individual as we
ourselves are.
I personally find the theme, 'Man's
Oops, that should have gone to Dario off list. Apologies.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 5/1/2007 10:10:30 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Christian pretty much summed up what I'd have said, but in a much more
articulate fashion.
Marnie, I know standing in the middle of the road's not always a good
thing, but from the looks of it, you
P. J. Alling wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
How about http://www.robertstech.com/files/knarf
I'll send you an FTP password
Don't trust him frank it's a trick, he just wants to steal the secrets
of theriaultian photography...
Bwahahahahahahaha!!!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
==
Reread what I said, I didn't say THAT was my theme. :-) It may be part of
it, it probably is part of it, but it may be equally or even more so...
extreme annoyance that we have all these phony distinctions about what is
a
landscape shot and what is an urban shot.
Well I think
On 5/1/07, Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think he means that with the switch to digital, the average photographer
has become more concerned with technical perfection. I believe that this is
generally true. With film, only those who did their own darkroom
The three of us in one vehicle, all day.Now i'm scared.:-)
Dave
On 5/1/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
How about http://www.robertstech.com/files/knarf
I'll send you an FTP password
Don't trust him frank it's a trick, he just
In a message dated 5/1/2007 10:45:30 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not head tripping. My opinions on the shots were my opinions on the
shots, regardless of what you choose to call the theme. :-)
Tom C
Lackluster. Right.
Got it.
Actually, my theme is
On 5/1/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
I even switched on JavaScript, which I only do in exceptional
circumstances, and got nada (using Firefox 2.0). They're probably
requiring even more plug-ins or something. They can go
themselves.
I don't know
On May 1, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
My Katz Eye screen is a plain matte fresnel surface without metering
aids, a custom design for scribed lines.
Yes, I talked with Rachel Katz about the problem I was seeing at
length. Her take on it is that Pentax reshaped the scatter of the
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo
