My dealer in Malta mentioned this to me... apparently the release is
quite imminent.
On 6/27/07, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thibouille wrote:
http://forum.xitek.com/sorthread.php?threadid=453926bcsi_scan_934C20D41D700C9A=YajnSdzdeM6pxFJl5YIX8wEAAACtx44Abcsi_scan_filename=sorthread.php
On 6/28/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They still trumpet K compatibility, but fail to mention any loss of
functionality. If you read this you'd almost think that the aperture
simulator was back. A marvel of marketing speak.
Yes, it's interesting how the marketing speak
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 07:44:53AM +0200, Thibouille wrote..
Very true, but AFAICT, they did exactly the same with previous bodies
since ist-D.
We shouldn't be surprised, really.
Then again, a D40 (if I rememeber well) is not even capable of any
metering at all with old Nikon lenses.
On 28.06.2007, at 07:44 , Thibouille wrote:
Then again, a D40 (if I rememeber well) is not even capable of any
metering at all with old Nikon lenses.
And higher-end D80 also. D40 doesn't allow AF with non-USM
screwdriven AF lenses
Anyway I really wouldn't wait for a True Kmount
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=23792403
Pentax announces update to K100D camera that supports new SDM lenses.
Based on K100D it features shake reduction and dust removal, like its
preceder and has 6.1 MP sensor.
--
new pictures once and again
On 28.06.2007, at 09:59 , Roman wrote:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=23792403
Pentax announces update to K100D camera that supports new SDM lenses.
Based on K100D it features shake reduction and dust removal, like its
preceder and has 6.1 MP sensor.
Does this
Yes, it seems to serve me quite well, althought sometimes f2.8 would
be nice (waiting for DA* 16-50/2.8 ;-), especially in darker
churches. I usually use it almost all the time, with just a few
photos taken with FA* 85/1.4. Here is the latest wedding where I was
taking shots with 16-45 and
On 28/6/07, Sylwester Pietrzyk, discombobulated, unleashed:
Does this guy read PDML? ;-)
Newsbot one week out of sync.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On 28.06.2007, at 10:24 , Cotty wrote:
Newsbot one week out of sync.
Must be of old type. Newer ones are capable of replying from time to
time ;-)
Cheers,
Sylwek
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 6/28/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 28/6/07, Sylwester Pietrzyk, discombobulated, unleashed:
Does this guy read PDML? ;-)
Newsbot one week out of sync.
The carrier pigeons that deliver the news on flash memory sticks have
to rest some time.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Thanks Ken.
On Jun 28, 2007, at 12:55 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Excellent flash usage Paul.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: Bee Balm
With the K10D, the A400/5.6 and the Pentax 560 plus Xtender
Brilliant. Have fired off to my kids whose knowledge of geography as I
understand it is truly awful.
Amazingly as a Brit, I did better on US states than European countries.
Break up of Yugoslavia and Soviet Union has clearly confused the hell
out of me.
Peter
ann sanfedele wrote:
jjust want
Thanks Frank.
The conversion has a lot of punch to it but for some reason when i
profiled it to sRGB and did SFW, which is what i think everyone has
suggested doing when doing a SFW, it sa lot less punchy, slmost flat.
Dave
On 6/27/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/27/07, David
So i was right. Hey i finally helped someone.LOL
Dave
On 6/27/07, cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I downloaded the 4.1 version of Camera Raw and it appears to be the ticket.
I'm currently importing 136 files. Two more cards to go :)
Some nifty shit in here too, if I do say so myself.
Sandy Harris wrote:
On 6/28/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They still trumpet K compatibility, but fail to mention any loss of
functionality. If you read this you'd almost think that the aperture
simulator was back. A marvel of marketing speak.
Yes, it's interesting how the
On 6/27/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/27/2007 2:58:53 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
WHAT ABOUT AN APERTURE SIMULATOR?!?!?
cheers,
frank
==
Sometimes I think you're just evil, frank.
You say that like it's a ~bad~
On 6/27/07, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think he is just _pretending_ and he really doesn't know any newfie jokes
Actually, it's dirty jokes that I don't know any of...
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 6/28/07, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 28/06/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob, you were right...
Generally yes, though I don't insist like some ;-)
HAR!
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hi all
The Pasha Bulker is a 76,000 tonne bulk carrier that became grounded during a
severe storm about 3 weeks ago. Since then it has become a tourist attraction
as it sits on Nobby's Beach, Newcastle waiting to be refloated (which is being
attempted as I write).
Anyway, on the spur of the
Those are pretty neat Brian. I particularly like the second one though.
Cheers,
Dave
On 6/28/07, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
The Pasha Bulker is a 76,000 tonne bulk carrier that became grounded during a
severe storm about 3 weeks ago. Since then it has become a tourist
P. J. Alling wrote:
Mike Hamilton wrote:
On 27-Jun-07, at 9:04 PM, PJ Alling wrote:
They still trumpet K compatibility, but fail to mention any loss of
functionality. If you read this you'd almost think that the aperture
simulator was back. A marvel of marketing speak.
Not so.
frank theriault wrote:
On 6/27/07, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think he is just _pretending_ and he really doesn't know any newfie
jokes
Actually, it's dirty jokes that I don't know any of...
Ask Doug Brewer. He'll tell you some.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
On 28.06.2007, at 09:59 , Roman wrote:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=23792403
Pentax announces update to K100D camera that supports new SDM lenses.
Based on K100D it features shake reduction and dust removal, like its
preceder and has
Well done shots. No Parking was a good catch. :)
Jack
--- Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
The Pasha Bulker is a 76,000 tonne bulk carrier that became grounded
during a severe storm about 3 weeks ago. Since then it has become a
tourist attraction as it sits on Nobby's Beach,
On 6/28/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's self explanatory...
http://home.earthlink.net/~morephotos/PESO%20--%20underachiever.html
Equipment: Pentax *ist-Ds/smc Pentax FA 28-200mm 3.8~5.6 AL[IF]
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
LOL!
Well seen and
frank theriault wrote:
On 6/28/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's self explanatory...
http://home.earthlink.net/~morephotos/PESO%20--%20underachiever.html
Equipment: Pentax *ist-Ds/smc Pentax FA 28-200mm 3.8~5.6 AL[IF]
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
- Original Message -
From: Sandy Harris
Subject: Re: K100D super (unofficial for now it seems)
Does anyone actually do this right -- provide full functionality with
legacy glass? I don't expect auto-focus from old lenses, but being
able to meter without stopping down would sure be
- Original Message -
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk
Subject: Re: Pentax K100D super
Does this guy read PDML? ;-)
Perhaps he is on a slow connection
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk
Subject: Re: K100D super (unofficial for now it seems)
But it would be nice in K10D class body. Just like Nikon did in D200,
where compatibility with manual lenses is better than in any Pentax
AF body, even these with full
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: K100D super (unofficial for now it seems)
That after 4 years of selling DSLR's they've got a good idea of the
importance of this information to 99.9% of their customers.
They are still catering to a price sensitive market. If
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Sandy Harris
Subject: Re: K100D super (unofficial for now it seems)
Does anyone actually do this right -- provide full functionality with
legacy glass? I don't expect auto-focus from old lenses, but being
able to meter without
The SDM support required a minor mechanical change to the miirror box,
changing the sensor would have required changing the entire imaging
subsystem. The other enhancements are mostly software.
Thibouille wrote:
Very true, but AFAICT, they did exactly the same with previous bodies
since
On 28/06/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know about Leica, but none of the Japanese manufacturers are 100%
supporting their older lenses. Pentax is actually the best of the lot.
And for a relatively small cost per body they could make the claim of
effectively 100% backwards
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk
Subject: Re: K100D super (unofficial for now it seems)
But it would be nice in K10D class body. Just like Nikon did in D200,
where compatibility with manual lenses is better than in any Pentax
AF body, even
On 28.06.2007, at 16:13 , Adam Maas wrote:
Pentax can't touch that anymore (since the MZ-S was the only body
with anything similar in capability)
Even MZ-S won't give you P-TTL and wireless flash with plain K lenses.
Cheers,
Sylwek
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Pentax used to and Nikon did for most, but woe betide you if you mounted
the wrong series lens on some cameras. It kind of depends how legacy
you want to get. m42 lenses give the exactly the same functionality,
(as do medium format lenses), on modern DSLR's that they had on the
first K mount
I have wondered that.
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
On 28.06.2007, at 09:59 , Roman wrote:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=23792403
Pentax announces update to K100D camera that supports new SDM lenses.
Based on K100D it features shake reduction and dust
On 29/06/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The SDM support required a minor mechanical change to the miirror box,
changing the sensor would have required changing the entire imaging
subsystem. The other enhancements are mostly software.
Minor to the point that it appears that they
On 29/06/07, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax can't touch that anymore (since the MZ-S was the only body
with anything similar in capability) even if a Pentax body can mount
lenses from 1948. Pentax offers no more support than Canon does for
pre-K mount lenses (and K mount was introduced
Ann, it's real, just as I found it.
ann sanfedele wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
On 6/28/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's self explanatory...
http://home.earthlink.net/~morephotos/PESO%20--%20underachiever.html
Equipment: Pentax *ist-Ds/smc Pentax FA 28-200mm
Peter Jordan wrote:
Brilliant. Have fired off to my kids whose knowledge of geography as I
understand it is truly awful.
Amazingly as a Brit, I did better on US states than European countries.
Break up of Yugoslavia and Soviet Union has clearly confused the hell
out of me.
Peter
Me too -
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: K100D super (unofficial for now it seems)
AI conversions cost about $30 these days and can be done at home with a
Dremel in a pinch. Nikon did factory conversions for 25 years, I think
that's enough for actual hardware mods for
- Original Message -
From: Digital Image Studio
Subject: Re: K100D super (unofficial for now it seems)
I don't know about Leica, but none of the Japanese manufacturers are 100%
supporting their older lenses. Pentax is actually the best of the lot.
And for a relatively small cost
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/temp.htm
My subjective, unscientific opinion is that the 645-A 200mm f/4.0 is
one hell of a sharp lens. Of course, you can't tell in this web image,
but looking at the 133 megabyte TIFF from the scanned transparency is
pretty amazing.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
On 29/06/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The best info I have been able to glean is a manufacturing cost of about
US$35.00 per body sold. What that would do to the retail price, and if the
price increase would dissuade more people from buying than the increase in
compatability would
Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/temp.htm
My subjective, unscientific opinion is that the 645-A 200mm f/4.0 is
one hell of a sharp lens. Of course, you can't tell in this web image,
but looking at the 133 megabyte TIFF from the scanned transparency is
pretty amazing.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: K100D super (unofficial for now it seems)
AI conversions cost about $30 these days and can be done at home with a
Dremel in a pinch. Nikon did factory conversions for 25 years, I think
that's enough for
WHAT ABOUT AN APERTURE SIMULATOR?!?!?
cheers,
frank
-
I preferred it when it was mistyped as aperture stimulator. Rather
Cotty-ish.
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
William Robb wrote:
From: Digital Image Studio
And for a relatively small cost per body they could make the
claim of effectively 100% backwards compatibility.
The best info I have been able to glean is a manufacturing cost of
about US$35.00 per body sold. What that would do to the retail
Nice photo, great title.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Just in case anyone out there uses PrintFix Pro to make their own
custom paper profiles: There's an upgrade available. When I bought it
in a bundle with the Spyder II monitor colorimeter late last year I got
PrintFix Pro v1.0 and I'm now downloading v2.2, which has been
available since April
For what it's worth, when I was a kid (mid-50's), the city of Detroit told the
guy across the street that he could no longer keep his mule in his garage
(since it had a dirt floor and a mule I guess technically it was a stable). Oh
yes they made him put in a concrete floor with rat walls too.
P. J. Alling wrote:
Ann, it's real, just as I found it.
Weird - and that plant isn't basil???
ann
ann sanfedele wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
On 6/28/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's self explanatory...
They can put ads on my website, all they have to do is pay me enough.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
ann sanfedele wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I have no problem with the bottom of
Until Ann mentioned it, i had never noticed. They seem at the bottom
of the page. I never look down, only up.:-)
Dave
On 6/27/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have no problem with the bottom of page ads on photo.net. In fact,
I never noticed them until they were mentioned here.
I think so with this paragraph(and yes i saw your smiley):-)
Dave
The K10D is unique in its ability to write RAW images as either
Pentax PEF or Adobe DNG files. For us, though, the K10D's biggest
wow is its in-camera processing capability. It allowed us to take a
digital-preview test shot,
I hope the magic lantern books have more than what the manual has. I
bought Moose Petterson's D2H must have book, and it was basically the
manual with his name on it. No tips or tricks just a rework of the
manual i already had.
Never again.
Dave
On 6/27/07, Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone actually do this?
David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/28/2007 2:26 PM
I think so with this paragraph(and yes i saw your smiley):-)
Dave
The K10D is unique in its ability to write RAW images as either
Pentax PEF or Adobe DNG files. For us, though, the K10D's biggest
wow is its
That sounds like perfect bullshit to me. It's a simple assembly easily
manufactured with similar assemblies in many other devices. However
there's no reason to use old technology. There are alternate designs
that would have totally digital output, and be even less expensive, and
more
No. I don't know what it is but it's not basil.
ann sanfedele wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
Ann, it's real, just as I found it.
Weird - and that plant isn't basil???
ann
ann sanfedele wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
On 6/28/07, P. J. Alling
On 6/28/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well done shots. No Parking was a good catch. :)
Agreed!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 6/28/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That sounds like perfect bullshit to me. It's a simple assembly easily
manufactured with similar assemblies in many other devices. However
there's no reason to use old technology. There are alternate designs
that would have totally digital
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: K100D super (unofficial for now it seems)
A D200 is $1599CDN and a K10D is $1099CDN, you must be looking at an
18-200/D200 kit to get 2.5x the price. Not as big a difference as you make
out. And as to EOS, I was talking about
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: K100D super (unofficial for now it seems)
A D200 is $1599CDN and a K10D is $1099CDN, you must be looking at an
18-200/D200 kit to get 2.5x the price. Not as big a difference as you make
out. And as to EOS, I was
I'm late on this but i particularly like the one of the bride and the
two little girls
look forward to seeing more..
isn't wedding photography a bitch
ann
Scott Loveless wrote:
I shot my first wedding on Saturday. That was one hell of a learning
experience. Some family members who
From:
Tom C
I see the ad. Personally an ad on the bottom of the page that can be
scrolled off the screen so it doesn't interfere with photos doesn't
bother me a whole lot. If the ads were on the sides of the page
however, there's no way I'd use it. A blinking ad would bother me no
On 6/28/07, Adam Maas
Note that you do get certain things for that extra 40% or so that the D200
costs.
I had a closer look at the BH website. They list the D200 body at
$1499.95 (after instant rebate), the K10D body is listed at $744.95
after a $50.00 mail in rebate.
This is getting to
From:
Mark Roberts
Peter Lacus wrote:
Mac users need not apply (yet).
As far as legitimate software leaking personal information *out*, Mac
users indeed should apply! The specific case that started this
discussion probably wasn't doing so (though there's no way for me to
From:
Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Jun 27, 2007, at 12:40 PM, John Francis wrote:
How does your software discriminate between an authorized connection
to a new destination initiated from inside the firewall and an
unrecognised connection? What are the criteria it uses as a
distinction?
There are
Nothing spécial to Adam but I had to respond somewhere.
It's me or this thread isheading the exact way as a JCO thread so much
people are complaining about??
Whatdid you expect, such compatibility with K mount on a K100D super?
If so, I'm sorry but this is silly. Othrwise, it has nothing to do
You know, I know quite a bit about digital design and digital controls,
but hey what does that have to do with current camera design.
William Robb wrote:
On 6/28/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That sounds like perfect bullshit to me. It's a simple assembly easily
manufactured
Which allows e.g. to rework a JPEG with a different White Balance or
different JPEG or Mpix settings from default used in RAW+ mode. VERY
useful is some circumstances.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
From:
Mark Roberts
http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/4242/editors-choice-2007-advanced-dslrs.html
Yes!!
But I think they should have noted that Pentax and Tokina worked
together in developing the 10 - 17 fisheye zoom
From:
Eactivist
In a message dated 6/27/2007 2:58:53 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
WHAT ABOUT AN APERTURE SIMULATOR?!?!?
cheers,
frank
==
Sometimes I think you're just evil, frank.
Someone want to explain the significance of an aperture simulator to
From:
cbwaters
Is it possible to have more than one set of Gamma instructions loading
on system start-up?
I've always had Adobe gamma and I think it's still loading but a
couple months ago I downloaded some program that was probably linked
here or on the Pentaxforums.com. I ran the
John Sessoms wrote:
Someone want to explain the significance of an aperture simulator to the
rest of us?
N! God, NO!
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Do you know those two are not even remotely the same image?
They may be two parking lot shots, but I don't even think they're from
the same parking lot.
The new one looks like the view from the Parkway overlook just outside
the entrance to Mount Mitchell State Park, and if the other is from
On 6/28/07, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From:
Eactivist
In a message dated 6/27/2007 2:58:53 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
WHAT ABOUT AN APERTURE SIMULATOR?!?!?
cheers,
frank
==
Sometimes I think you're just evil, frank.
Actually,
On 28/6/07, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
I can't see an ad anywhere on the page. Am I looking at the right page?
http://www.photo.net/photos/annsan
I can see a small banner at the bottom advertising Canon lenses.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
From:
Steve Desjardins
Does anyone actually do this?
David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/28/2007 2:26 PM
I think so with this paragraph(and yes i saw your smiley):-)
Dave
The K10D is unique in its ability to write RAW images as either
Pentax PEF or Adobe DNG files. For us,
John Sessoms wrote:
Do you know those two are not even remotely the same image?
Sorry John, my temp.htm page is temporary and has changed since this
discussion took place.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 29/06/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We appear to have a few people on list who know more about camera
manufacture and the economics thereof than the people who make them.
It's surprising that there are not more camera manufacturers given the
level of knowledge and expertise
On 29/06/07, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've played around with some of it. I'm still figuring out what it can
do for me.
I have used the preview adjust white balance function. Found them by
accident looking at something else. I've also used the extended
bracketing thing a
On 29/06/07, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It might be *possible*, especially with Windoze, although I'm sure it
shouldn't be.
It is quite possible and very common to accidentally have more than
one program pre-setting the LUT on a Windows machine. Documentation
for most applications
William Robb wrote:
On 6/28/07, Adam Maas
Note that you do get certain things for that extra 40% or so that the D200
costs.
I had a closer look at the BH website. They list the D200 body at
$1499.95 (after instant rebate), the K10D body is listed at $744.95
after a $50.00 mail in
On 29/06/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Until Ann mentioned it, i had never noticed. They seem at the bottom
of the page. I never look down, only up.:-)
Didn't know it was there either until I checked my Adblock items
list. For those of you running Firefox this little utility is a
In a message dated 6/28/2007 4:18:36 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Didn't know it was there either until I checked my Adblock items
list. For those of you running Firefox this little utility is a
godsend:
http://adblock.mozdev.org/
--
Rob Studdert
=
Cool.
In a message dated 6/28/2007 2:51:25 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
N! God, NO!
Well, someone could take it upon themselves to explain it to him off list.
OTOH, maybe Graywolf could add it to the mini-faq. Topics to avoid.
Marnie aka Doe
On Jun 28, 2007, at 2:08 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
Less of a pain than having some internet trash taking over your system
and using it as an open relay.
I have a firewall in my base station that masks the internal network
from external view without permission, John. Nothing gets to my
In a message dated 6/27/2007 10:26:37 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's self explanatory...
http://home.earthlink.net/~morephotos/PESO%20--%20underachiever.html
Equipment: Pentax *ist-Ds/smc Pentax FA 28-200mm 3.8~5.6 AL[IF]
As usual comments are welcome but may
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/walkinggirl.html
Shot with the K10, and 77mm ltd.
Cropped slightly from the full file.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 6/28/2007 5:30:16 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's a couple - clicking on the Vieew Album link will produce a few
more.
http://tinyurl.com/2uf5mx
http://picasaweb.google.com/supera1000/PashaBulker/photo?authkey=ncDWM5W7Hgg#5
081078681021740178
Ooh I like that one. Nice work.
Cheers,
Dave
On 6/29/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/walkinggirl.html
Shot with the K10, and 77mm ltd.
Cropped slightly from the full file.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
What he said. And if it was me, I'd go back and take more too. Good subject.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
==
On 6/27/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/27/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6131669
Took a bit of a
In a message dated 6/4/2007 6:44:51 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's one very cute cat there.
I like both poses!
Kenneth Waller
What he said. But I like the first a tad better, because of the unusual
angle of looking UP at a cat.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
In a message dated 6/27/2007 4:04:05 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
With the K10D, the A400/5.6 and the Pentax 560 plus Xtender
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6133459size=lg
I like the flower, but overall think the frame is a little too
In a message dated 6/28/2007 5:22:26 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/walkinggirl.html
Shot with the K10, and 77mm ltd.
Cropped slightly from the full file.
William Robb
=
A little blown out around her legs, but
In a message dated 6/22/2007 2:24:39 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Those who are Arachnophobic have been warned: SPIDER PICTURE
The wife and I were walking across a bridge at sunset and came across
this guy. I had the Fujifilm F30 on my belt so I took a quick
Nothing special.
Really.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/smokebreak.html
Another shot with the 77mm LTD. I'm finding I am quite liking this lens.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 6/22/2007 11:18:09 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I still plan to cycle around South and West Dorset and visit various
Hardy sites, and the prehistoric and Roman sites, but I'll do it from
a base near Dorchester. Maybe even next week, if I can find
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
