From:
Digital Image Studio
On 13/07/07, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless I have the copyright holders expressed permission; a written
release; under the DMCA, I must not allow copyrighted material to be
reproduced on my equipment.
That's all fair enough given the laws however how
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
John Sessoms
...
I'm *required by law*, and by my employer, to stop them from using our
equipment to reproduce copyrighted material, *UNLESS*.
the person attempting to print the photo has a signed copyright
release
from the
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
John Sessoms
...
It's not that hard to recognize professional work. Especially if it's
stamped with copyright notices on the back.
And doubly especially if it's a regular customer who brings in
under-exposed disposable cameras
Thanks to everybody.
Yes, I used PTLens some time ago (free version), and I appreciate it. I'm
going to suggest it (and others' suggestions) to my friend who is thinking
buying the DA 10-17.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Quoting P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Not high art, heck not even low art. I decided to visit the beach
and
shoot the sunset. Not spectacular, a bit disappointing actually.
However I refuse to take no for an answer, even from nature, and I
made
a few pictures anyway.
Good for
Same comment as for 'Sunset II'
I think I like this one just a little more. I don't know why
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
Quoting P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Not high art, heck
Well said, Bob. Nice pick of examples too.
Inescapable anthropocentrism, it seems. :-)
Jostein
2007/7/12, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I wouldn't describe it as people vs. landscape - they don't exclude
each other, it is, as you say, about longevity and history. There are
also all types of
I am not aware on one which will feed an external monitor, but even if
you did, you would still need access to the unit to use the touch screen
for control purposes - although I guess if it were in a pocket between
the front seats you could still do this... I know the Navman units
don't allow it.
Thanks Jack.
Maybe the smaller web photo does not show it, but there is a bit on
the end of the fence headstone and back of the church.
What should i be loooking for in help to straighten lines. I forget the term
Dave
On 7/12/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say the shot lends
Thanks.
I spent two days on this one, but not hours on hours.:-)
This is pretty much the firt full use of ALL layers commands
Seems to work:-)
Channel mixer was R=25, G= 70 and B=5 to start
Dave
On 7/12/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice conversion.
David J Brooks wrote:
Hi
On 7/12/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Team roping is like lacross, only with a bigger ball.:-)
I'd hate to be the goalie!
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 7/12/07, Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm in Pamplona, another year in the fiesta. This year for the first
time, I haven't run with the bulls for a couple of days, and instead
got a press pass to shoot from the sidelines.
This morning's was one of the worst encierros in the last 10
- Original Message -
From: Sandy Harris
Subject: Re: DMCA Takedown (was Stolen Photos)
That ONLY covers circumventing technical protection measures.
..snip
My point here is that that part of the DMCA says nothing at all
about just printing a file the customer brings in.
On 7/12/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not high art, heck not even low art. I decided to visit the beach and
shoot the sunset. Not spectacular, a bit disappointing actually.
However I refuse to take no for an answer, even from nature, and I made
a few pictures anyway.
I like this one better than sunset I, nice contrast in both and in
this one I like where you placed the people in particular, and the
composition in general.
Cheers, Fernando
On 7/12/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not high art, heck not even low art. I decided to visit the beach and
I agree and I think it's partly due to the overall color tone.
Even though allowed to soften out, I can't seem to get past the near
connection of the base of the cup and the bottom of the frame.
Jack
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simple, to be sure.
I take photos of coffee
OK, consider it ignored.
Cheers
Dave
On 7/13/07, Antti-Pekka Virjonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is just a test of my e-mail client and our company server regarding
some settings I have changed. Please ignore this.
Thank you,
Antti-Pekka
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 7/12/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not high art, heck not even low art. I decided to visit the beach and
shoot the sunset. Not spectacular, a bit disappointing actually.
However I refuse to take no for an answer, even from nature, and I made
a few pictures anyway.
On 7/12/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
Yes the town name is spelt correctly in the header.:-)
Taken a few weeks ago during the Peff's Mill drive. Small church at a
cross roads of two dirt roads. Colour photo and converrted to BW with
C Mixer and about 1/2 dozen curves
On 7/13/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simple, to be sure.
I take photos of coffee cups and simple objects about me all the time
- did it in my pre-digital days, and do it much more now.
I don't know what it is, but there's something about this one that
seems to take it beyond
- Original Message -
From: John Sessoms
Subject: Re: DMCA Takedown (was Stolen Photos)
William Robb
Nope. You're still missing the point.
No John, I'm not missing the point. I was a photofinisher for some 25 years,
I dealt with this all the time.
William Robb
--
PDML
Sorry, I'm afraid I can't help you in the fence straightening (still
don't pick it up).
If you're planning on re-shooting it, I suggest you take along
something to stand on which will let you place the far fence line below
the foundation of the church.
Jack
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 7/13/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree and I think it's partly due to the overall color tone.
Even though allowed to soften out, I can't seem to get past the near
connection of the base of the cup and the bottom of the frame.
Yeah, the more I look at it, the more I wish there
frank theriault wrote:
On 7/12/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A recent study found the average Canadian walks about 900 miles a year.
Another study found Canadians drink, on average, 22 gallons of beer a year.
That means, on average, Canadians get about 41 miles to the
- Original Message -
From: graywolf
Subject: Re: DMCA Takedown (was Stolen Photos)
At which point I would hand them my business card and ask, Am I supposed
to produce crappy photos when I do them for myself? And anyone with a
computer can print up business cards. Also, lousy
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The Morning Fix
I reacted the same way. Interesting light and shape, but the bottom of the
cup resting on the edge of frame is a problem. You could clone some more
frame on the bottom of the shot. You have enough shadow tone
Actually, looking at it you might have some luck with a PDA running
satnav software. The PDA will not be as good as a dedicated unit but is
more likely to feed an external monitor (although I don't know much
about PDAs to be honest!).
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Rob Brigham
Sent: 13
Thanks for looking.
Is there anything on the market that will allow connection from a GPS
(like a TomTom etc) to an external monitor? I have a 7 inch LCD on my
dash that shows me the view from the reversing camera on my truck. It
can switch between inputs and has an AV connection - are there any
Thanks Bruce.
At first i had lined up an angle i was happy with, with out the fence,
just the church and the headstone. I went to the side of the road and
took these with the fence. It seemed more countryish with the fence
and i thought the litte cemetery looked nicer.
I am going back and
Nice light. The position of the pilings is unfortunate. You might
clone them out. Easy PS job.
Paul
On Jul 12, 2007, at 10:32 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Not high art, heck not even low art. I decided to visit the beach and
shoot the sunset. Not spectacular, a bit disappointing actually.
Nice composition, great light. Well done.
Paul
On Jul 12, 2007, at 10:39 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Not high art, heck not even low art. I decided to visit the beach and
shoot the sunset. Not spectacular, a bit disappointing actually.
However I refuse to take no for an answer, even from nature,
This is just a test of my e-mail client and our company server regarding
some settings I have changed. Please ignore this.
Thank you,
Antti-Pekka
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of John Sessoms
...
I'm *required by law*, and by my employer, to stop them from
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: Dave Savage, did you come across this Canadian fact on your
trip.
Your under-19-year-olds must be different from the ones we have around
here...
Ours are usually on crystal meth by that time.
William Robb
--
PDML
Thanks everybody for the nice comments.
Here's a couple more, from this morning's run:
http://photoblog.jbuhler.com/index.php?showimage=840
And a color one:
http://color.jbuhler.com/index.php?showimage=161
I plan to make a series. Not sure yet if in bw or color. I was
thinking bw, as usual,
Just trying to keep up to speed
LOL
Dave
On 7/12/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/7/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
Excelete shot
Dave, you're priceless :-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On 7/12/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A recent study found the average Canadian walks about 900 miles a year.
Another study found Canadians drink, on average, 22 gallons of beer a year.
That means, on average, Canadians get about 41 miles to the gallon.
And when you figure
On 7/13/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or, he could have taken a good picture in the first place and not resort to
trying to make a silk purse from a sow's ear.
I would lean toward your solution, Bill.
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri
Simple, to be sure.
I take photos of coffee cups and simple objects about me all the time
- did it in my pre-digital days, and do it much more now.
I don't know what it is, but there's something about this one that
seems to take it beyond the usual mundane mug shot. It's subtle, to
be sure, but
Cotty wrote:
Thanks for looking.
Is there anything on the market that will allow connection from a GPS
(like a TomTom etc) to an external monitor? I have a 7 inch LCD on my
dash that shows me the view from the reversing camera on my truck. It
can switch between inputs and has an AV
I reacted the same way. Interesting light and shape, but the bottom of the cup
resting on the edge of frame is a problem. You could clone some more frame on
the bottom of the shot. You have enough shadow tone to create an extension of
the shadow below the cup, and the rest of the frame is just
But some of us enjoy trying to make a silk purse from a sow's ear. It can be an
interesting challenge.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The Morning Fix
I
frank theriault wrote:
On 7/12/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A recent study found the average Canadian walks about 900 miles a year.
Another study found Canadians drink, on average, 22 gallons of beer a
year.
That means, on average, Canadians get about 41 miles to the gallon.
On 7/13/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kids under 19 drink far less than adults,
At least that's what parents hope.
:-D
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault
Subject: Re: The Morning Fix
Or, he could have taken a good picture in the first place and not resort
to
trying to make a silk purse from a sow's ear.
I would lean toward your solution, Bill.
;-)
I still have a hard time with the
On 7/13/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still have a hard time with the fix it in Photoshop mentality. It leads to
sloppy photography.
Keep that in mind as you make the transition over to digital.
For better or worse, I don't think digitally in terms of what I can
do with an
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The Morning Fix
Digital doesn't have to lead to sloppy photography.
Perhaps, perhaps not, but the fix it in Photoshop mentality certainly can,
and often does.
You seem to be equating one with the other, I don't.
William
..it pays to check why earlier than later:
http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/Thomas/photo?authkey=pzmnlsD2ZJI#5086598110863323682
Not a particularly good shot but the light was shocking and I used
what gear was on hand at that moment.
The little guy was one the other day, so we've both made
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault
Subject: Re: The Morning Fix
I still have a hard time with the fix it in Photoshop mentality. It leads
to
sloppy photography.
Keep that in mind as you make the transition over to digital.
For better or worse, I don't think digitally in
Digital doesn't have to lead to sloppy photography. That's just a matter of
self discipline. But being able to fix a mistake can be a godsend. Having a
digital workplace also enables one to do things that couldn't easily be
accomplished other wise. For Example, I can place white cards on the
I run GPS on a Pocket Computer in the truck and see no way to do that.
Maybe you could buy a cheap second hand notebook computer, plug a gps card into
that, and use the extern monitor port to hook it to the in dash display. You
could put the notebook under the seat or something. But that still
On 12/07/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Panorama stitching programs have the ability to correct lens
distortions. I use PTGui (not free), but Hugin is free, and from what
I've seen does a good job.
You set control points to map the verticals horizontals that should
be straight
Until the goverment would pay me for doing their law enforcement I wouldn't
worry about it. It's a different matter for selling tobacco or alcohol to
minors.
While not being a scofflaw, the law and penalties are a bit of a joke.
Right now how many bootleg DVD's are out here on e-bay, made by
William Robb wrote:
Ah, but over time you will find Photoshop to be a seductive whore, and then
the little tweaks will start, removing things that are unhandy, that sort of
thing.
You'll justify it by saying that it's art, or it's no big deal, or the
picture is more important than the
I was going to comment that Photoshopping a photo is OK, if the photographer
already knew exactly what he was going to do to it in Photoshop before pushing
the button. That is called previsualization and really is nothing different
than what good photographers did in the darkroom days.
That's where I'm coming from exactly. Better not do any reprints at all
then. How can one know whether the written permission is authentic? Does one
call the photographer? What if *I* took the photos and want reprints? How
do I prove that I'm the photographer? Do I write myself a note?
Tom
On 7/13/07, Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William Robb wrote:
Ah, but over time you will find Photoshop to be a seductive whore, and then
the little tweaks will start, removing things that are unhandy, that sort of
thing.
You'll justify it by saying that it's art, or it's no big
-- Original message --
Ah, but over time you will find Photoshop to be a seductive whore, and then
the little tweaks will start, removing things that are unhandy,
That can often be a huge advantage. You can't always shoot around a telephone
pole, and,
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: DMCA Takedown (was Stolen Photos)
That's where I'm coming from exactly. Better not do any reprints at all
then. How can one know whether the written permission is authentic? Does
one
call the photographer? What if *I* took the photos
On 7/13/07, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
..it pays to check why earlier than later:
http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/Thomas/photo?authkey=pzmnlsD2ZJI#5086598110863323682
LOL. Cute, very cute.
Not a particularly good shot but the light was shocking and I used
what gear
Ah, yes. The why is he being so quiet moment. Been there. Fun pic.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
..it pays to check why earlier than later:
From: graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But once again I ask, who gave you law enforcement authority? You are just
like those security guards that like to pretend they are cops.
Yep. Supposed responsibility with no authority.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Internal Revenue requirement paraphrase:
'If any portion of your income was obtained by illegal means such as
betting, illegal gambling, or other criminal activity, it still must be
claimed and the source of income must be listed'.
Tom C.
If the picture looks too good to be an amateur
Respectfully Tom, you are wrong. It is illegal to copy copywritten work
except in fairly limited circumstances, and there is nothing in copyright
law that puts any onus on the copyright owner to mark the work as copyright
protected.
The person who owns the equipment used is liable for the work
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: DMCA Takedown (was Stolen Photos)
That's where I'm coming from exactly. Better not do any reprints at all
then. How can one know whether the written permission is authentic? Does
one
call the photographer? What if *I* took the photos
frank theriault wrote:
On 7/13/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree and I think it's partly due to the overall color tone.
Even though allowed to soften out, I can't seem to get past the near
connection of the base of the cup and the bottom of the frame.
Yeah, the more I
On Jul 12, 2007, at 4:01 PM, John Francis wrote:
My 80-200 has developed a problem; when it is zoomed to the
wide end (80mm) it can't achieve infinity focus (or even
anything further away than maybe 20' from the camera).
Unfortunately I discovered this when I was reviewing the
photographs I
Well composed Dave.
Tom C.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6188200
Dave
--
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
frank theriault wrote:
On 7/13/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still have a hard time with the fix it in Photoshop mentality. It
leads to
sloppy photography.
Keep that in mind as you make the transition over to digital.
For better or worse, I don't think digitally in terms of
William Robb wrote:
Ah, but over time you will find Photoshop to be a seductive whore, and then
the little tweaks will start, removing things that are unhandy, that sort of
thing.
You'll justify it by saying that it's art, or it's no big deal, or the
picture is more important than the process,
From: frank theriault
Subject: Re: The Morning Fix
I still have a hard time with the fix it in Photoshop mentality. It
leads
to
sloppy photography.
SAYS A GUY WHOS CONSIDERS FOCUS TO BE BOURGEOIS! :-)
- Original Message -
From: graywolf
Subject: Re: The Morning Fix
I was going to comment that Photoshopping a photo is OK, if the
photographer already knew exactly what he was going to do to it in
Photoshop before pushing the button. That is called previsualization and
really is
William Robb wrote:
Ah, but over time you will find Photoshop to be a seductive whore,
and then the little tweaks will start, removing things that are
unhandy, that sort of thing.
Oh come on, Bill. Just because *you* respond that way to the
availability of Photoshop doesn't mean everyone
I imagine the mug will still be available for a re-shoot tomorrow if
desired :)
Did he get a signed model release and permission of the mfr. to make a
fascimile?
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Mark!
frank theriault wrote:
I still have a hard time with the fix it in Photoshop mentality. It leads
to sloppy photography.
Tom C.
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: The Morning
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: DMCA Takedown (was Stolen Photos)
Respectfully Tom, you are wrong. It is illegal to copy copywritten work
except in fairly limited circumstances, and there is nothing in copyright
law that puts any onus on the copyright owner to mark the
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: The Morning Fix
LOL. You've been there then. ;-) That distracting glint on a tree
branch,
the minor deviance from perfectly horizontal, that little bit of power
line.
I've worn out several pocket protectors in the past few
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: DMCA Takedown (was Stolen Photos)
As the photographer I customarialy remove EXIF's from material or I use
film. ;-)
Save for web will strip the exif data, but if the file is large enough to
print, you are bypassing a warning that the
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Seriously though, I'm not sure that the picture is more important than
the process, but the picture is definitely more important than the ego
of the purist who refuses to do *anything* to it in Photoshop.
My perspective has changed from the pre-digital film
I use it for stitching panos and for coordinate transformations
(e.g. fisheye-rectilinear).
http://hugin.sourceforge.net/
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Dario Bonazza wrote:
A friend of mine is interested in obtaining rectilinear pictures from his
10-17mm fisheye zoom.
Does anyone has
P. J. Alling wrote:
Not high art, heck not even low art. I decided to visit the beach and
shoot the sunset. Not spectacular, a bit disappointing actually.
However I refuse to take no for an answer, even from nature, and I made
a few pictures anyway.
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: DMCA Takedown (was Stolen Photos)
Until the goverment would pay me for doing their law enforcement I
wouldn't
worry about it. It's a different matter for selling tobacco or alcohol to
minors.
How is refusing to sell tobacco or
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, David Savage wrote:
PS is OK for small distortions, but it's not so good for correcting
those inherent to fisheye lenses.
Sorry folks...One of my pet peeves here
Fisheye lenses are no more distorted than regular rectilinear.
It's just a different type
On 7/14/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a huge difference between previsualizing with film, and what passes
for previsualization with digital.
I can't agree with that.
IMO it's the same thing. The medium is irrelevant.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
William Robb wrote:
I still have a hard time with the fix it in Photoshop
mentality. It leads to
sloppy photography.
Keep that in mind as you make the transition over to digital.
Or it can lead to no photography - why spend all that cash on a camera,
accessories and travel, when you can
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: DMCA Takedown (was Stolen Photos)
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:47:24 -0600
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: DMCA Takedown (was Stolen
On 7/14/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a huge difference between previsualizing with film, and what
passes
for previsualization with digital.
I can't agree with that.
IMO it's the same thing. The medium is irrelevant.
Cheers,
Dave
That's beacuse your a dirty rotten
This one is nice too.
Good composition, the diagonal between the people, and how they're
positioned in the frame.
Personally, I have a slight preference for #1 because the foreground
person is placed opposite the direction of the light, but it's not
very meaningful to compare them to each other.
Really like the composition of this one, Peter. The way the stones on
the left help form a line from the person in the foreground to the two
at the back, and the stones on the right close the circle back to the
foreground. The light comes at a very complimentary angle too.
It's a great shot, imo.
Hehehe. The title makes it. Funny shot, Frank.
Showed it to my oldest son (14), and he agrees.
Jostein
2007/7/11, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://tinyurl.com/yptee7
Having a bit of fun with two of my daughters on a recent trip to the Museum...
Here's the full url, for those of you
It's the lighting on the rim - right where focus is sharpest. Also
the blue ring just below it helps to emphasize it. Basically makes
your eyes jump right to that spot and keeps pulling them back.
--
Bruce
Friday, July 13, 2007, 5:59:27 AM, you wrote:
JD I agree and I think it's partly due
chuckle reminds me of the time when my oldest was about 3 or so. I
was home alone with her and she had gone to her room to play. It got
real quiet so I thought I better go check on her. When I opened the
door to her room I found she had taken a black marker and held it
against the wall as she
Me too.
Is that tritto?
Jostein
2007/7/11, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The shot is just too tight for my taste. It really makes me struggle
to figure it out.
Ditto
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO: Prep'ed
Great light !
I find it too tightly copped the merge of the bow piling distracting.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO -- Charming
Not high art, heck not even low art. I decided to visit the beach and
shoot the sunset. Not
Now i have to ~remember` to.:-)
Dave
On 7/13/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/12/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
Yes the town name is spelt correctly in the header.:-)
Taken a few weeks ago during the Peff's Mill drive. Small church at a
cross
What Paul said so well!
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Original message --
Ah, but over time you will find Photoshop to be a seductive whore,
and then
the little tweaks will start, removing things that are unhandy,
That can often be a huge
Thanks Jack.
Isn't there a way in PS to straighten out the bit of cure a WA lens
gives to certain partsa of a photo. Thats what i was getting at if
that helps.
Anyway, i tried today, after driver training but the clouds have come
in. To dark for an IR shot. I can get the truck near the fence, so
That's exactly the way I thought when first making the framing comment.
I had no thought of fixing it, just offering what night be viewed as a
helpful comment if, as is ofter true of me, it were an element that may
have been in question any way.
I didn't assume Frank wasn't aware of it.
Jack
---
Today???
Doug Brewer wrote:
William Robb wrote:
Ah, but over time you will find Photoshop to be a seductive whore, and then
the little tweaks will start, removing things that are unhandy, that sort of
thing.
You'll justify it by saying that it's art, or it's no big deal, or the
Or, he could have taken a good picture in the first place and not resort
to
trying to make a silk purse from a sow's ear.
Mark !!
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The Morning Fix
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL
This looks too much link my original work IKEA breakfast, and I demand
royalties!
(Letting another thread leak into this one).
frank theriault wrote:
Simple, to be sure.
I take photos of coffee cups and simple objects about me all the time
- did it in my pre-digital days, and do it much
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
