From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/09/10 Mon PM 03:21:34 GMT
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Geso Some from the Championships
On 10/09/07, Rebekah, discombobulated, unleashed:
cool! impressive to do so well on such a muddy day, looks dangerous.
(but I don't know
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/09/10 Mon PM 03:45:59 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO Challenger (Going OT)
The rational part of me knows whats the logic direction of the splashes are.
But my brain ain't rational. Never has been, never
On 9/11/07, Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or, if you're looking to spend enough on a lens to buy a small car, you
could seek out the FA* 80-200. :-) I think someone posted a FS on PDML
for one in the last few days. (1,400 euro if I recall correctly).
Probably not. I need a new
Yeah, there is that new website :-D ...
I looked and there were more submissions of the FAJ 75-300 (50+) as
compared to the FA 80-320 (20+). I guess the FAJ is more accessible
than the 320. Looking at the shots however, makes me lean further to
the FA 80-320...I dunno but they feel/look better.
On 9/11/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I first started getting into Photoshop I bought a couple of
training videos from here (try the preview chapters):
http://www.vtc.com/
PS books are OK but some concepts techniques really benefit from
monkey see, monkey do learning :-)
So now I'm registered and I've booked my flight and hotel, so I *will*
be attending the Adobe Max conference in Chicago Sept 30 - Oct 3.
(www.adobemax2007.com) Anyone else in the business (that is, any of
the many businesses that various Adobe products now cover) going?
Looks like I'll be
What are thoughts on the Pentax A 300mm f2.8?
From: Henk Terhell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: The occasional 300mm
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:06:56 +0200
I got the FA 80-320/4.5-5.6 for many years
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/09/10 Mon PM 10:28:51 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Geso Some from the Championships
On 9/10/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
On 9/10/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A reworking of a rather primitive earlier attempt of a street portrait:
http://tinyurl.com/2njs7f
http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RuaIGV2ierI/Aq8/seSXvLHvk2Q/s1600-h/sept_11+001.jpg
The original:
http://tinyurl.com/2nyke2
Hal Davis wrote:
What are thoughts on the Pentax A 300mm f2.8?
It's a great lens, but /expensive/. I paid less for all of my cameras
and lenses put together ... well, that's a /little/ bit of an
exaggeration, but not a terrible one. ;-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
From: Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/09/11 Tue PM 12:30:41 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: The occasional 300mm
Hal Davis wrote:
What are thoughts on the Pentax A 300mm f2.8?
It's a great lens, but /expensive/. I paid less for all of my
It's very expensive, weighs enough to make a good anchor for small boat.
Oh yes, you probably meant it's optical quality. Never used one
unfortunately. It's supposed to be very, very good.
Hal Davis wrote:
What are thoughts on the Pentax A 300mm f2.8?
From: Henk Terhell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/9/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Based on the input I received, I have done some revision to the image,
rotation and crop. I am thankful for your willingness to share your
thoughts and ideas.
So here is version 2:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4965a.htm
Original for
The BW is a definite improvement.
Rick
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A reworking of a rather primitive earlier attempt of
a street portrait:
http://tinyurl.com/2njs7f
http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RuaIGV2ierI/Aq8/seSXvLHvk2Q/s1600-h/sept_11+001.jpg
The
I've noticed that I shoot a lot of things at 43mm even if I'm using a
zoom. I rather like that focal length on digital. Here's another...
http://www.mindspring.com/~happydogsoftware/PESO%20--%20crabbin.html
Equipment Pentax *ist-Ds/smc Pentax FA 20-35mm f4.0 AL
As usual comments are welcome
frank theriault wrote:
A reworking of a rather primitive earlier attempt of a street portrait:
http://tinyurl.com/2njs7f
http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RuaIGV2ierI/Aq8/seSXvLHvk2Q/s1600-h/sept_11+001.jpg
The original:
http://tinyurl.com/2nyke2
Much prefer the BW.
Regards,
John
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 08:27:08 -0400, frank theriault wrote
A reworking of a rather primitive earlier attempt of a street portrait:
http://tinyurl.com/2njs7f
http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RuaIGV2ierI/Aq8/seSXvLHvk2Q/s1600
-h/sept_11+001.jpg
On 9/11/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not a bad photograph, but I just can't look at it for very long.
My eye is drawn to his teeth. I find this disturbing. The black and
white rendering is better, though.
You don't like his teeth?
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is
Very nice scene, Peter.
Suggestion: Knock down the highlights on the over exposed Crabbers
and surrounding area. There may not be sufficient detail to warrant it,
but considering their size, I don't think it would matter.
Jack
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've noticed that I shoot
Has anyone here tried the Takumar-A 2X teleconverter on the digital
bodies? I'm referring to this unit:
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/teleconverters/Takumar-A_2X.html
I'd like to know if it works in all metering modes. I mean, I think it
should since it should have full A coupling, I'm just
frank theriault wrote:
On 9/11/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not a bad photograph, but I just can't look at it for very long.
My eye is drawn to his teeth. I find this disturbing. The black and
white rendering is better, though.
You don't like his teeth?
Howdy, folks. Since the Harrisburg PDML gathering didn't generate much
interest, Rick and I decided to move it to Philly. It's this weekend,
Saturday the 15th, which should be a little easier for the New Yorkers
who don't already have plans (Norm). Details to follow. That is all.
--
Scott
I had one for a bit (Got it off Aaron) and did use it a few times with my A
70-210/4. Worked in all modes, but doesn't support the extras of the KAF mount
(MTF data, AF, focal length communication)
-Adam
Toralf Lund wrote:
Has anyone here tried the Takumar-A 2X teleconverter on the digital
I bought one used on ebay when ebay prices were on the earth, I paid I
think somewhere in the neighborhood of $1200, plus it came with the
1.4x teleconverter, a steal really.
Its an amazing lens, razor sharp, even with the teleconverter. But
its heavy, needs an extremely steady(heavy) tripod,
On 11/09/07, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
PS books are OK but some concepts techniques really benefit from
monkey see, monkey do learning :-)
What a load of balls.
Now pass me a banana will you ? ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
On 11/09/07, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
A reworking of a rather primitive earlier attempt of a street portrait:
http://tinyurl.com/2njs7f
http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RuaIGV2ierI/Aq8/seSXvLHvk2Q/
s1600-h/sept_11+001.jpg
Attaboy. Nice work Frank.
--
Cheers,
Proposed program:
Meet at 30th St. Station ~10:30am; take the subway to
Old City, which has great architecture, many
galleries, and interesting people. Lunch at the new
Triumph Brewpub. After lunch, we can wander to
Independence Hall/Liberty Bell/Constitution Center, or
the Independence Seaport
On 9/11/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/09/07, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
PS books are OK but some concepts techniques really benefit from
monkey see, monkey do learning :-)
What a load of balls.
Ugh, ugh, ugh, ugh...
Now pass me a banana will you ? ;-)
:-P
One of the biggest raves in the country is going to be this weekend in
Baltimore. Why don't you guys go photograph that ;)
rg2
On 9/11/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Proposed program:
Meet at 30th St. Station ~10:30am; take the subway to
Old City, which has great architecture, many
I'm a bit lost on the caption versus what I am seeing - actually, I'm
not quite sure what I am seeing. The people are too small for me to
really make out what is happening and they are kind of blown out.
It is more like two different scenes combined - a scenic of a
pond/lake and some people
I have added a few more images to my portfolio at Photo.net.
Unfortunately, I can't get decent quality when posting to the web. I have to
boost brightness, contrast and saturation so that particularly the sky in
some images look uneven. Anyway, here they are. Comments welcomed.
The BW seems a bit better, but I'm not sure I would have cropped any
tighter. My lean is toward BW with the original cropping.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, September 11, 2007, 5:27:08 AM, you wrote:
ft A reworking of a rather primitive earlier attempt of a street portrait:
ft http://tinyurl.com/2njs7f
On 9/11/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've noticed that I shoot a lot of things at 43mm even if I'm using a
zoom. I rather like that focal length on digital. Here's another...
http://www.mindspring.com/~happydogsoftware/PESO%20--%20crabbin.html
Equipment Pentax *ist-Ds/smc Pentax
Voff, how ya doin'?
Maybe my tastes are changing. They do seem too bright and saturated to me.
My first impression is that viewed together as a collection of thumbnails,
it's overpowering. Nice compositions.
Tom C.
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Pål Jensen wrote:
I have added a few more images to my portfolio at Photo.net.
Unfortunately, I can't get decent quality when posting to the web. I have to
boost brightness, contrast and saturation so that particularly the sky in
some images look uneven. Anyway, here they are. Comments
Adam Maas wrote:
I had one for a bit (Got it off Aaron) and did use it a few times with my A
70-210/4. Worked in all modes, but doesn't support the extras of the KAF
mount (MTF data, AF, focal length communication)
Yeah, now that you mention it, I've noticed that my MZ-5n doesn't report
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:53:01PM +, mike wilson wrote:
From: Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/09/11 Tue PM 12:30:41 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: The occasional 300mm
Hal Davis wrote:
What are thoughts on the Pentax A 300mm f2.8?
You couldn't drag me to such an event in chains.
--- Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the biggest raves in the country is going to
be this weekend in
Baltimore. Why don't you guys go photograph that ;)
rg2
On 9/11/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Proposed program:
Some great shots, but most are oversaturated, some are too bright and too
contrasty. If you set the colorspace to SRGB and do a Save for Web in
PhotoShop, you shouldn't have any problems maintaining the look of your
original on the web.
Paul
-- Original message
On Sep 11, 2007, at 9:29 AM, Pål Jensen wrote:
I have added a few more images to my portfolio at Photo.net.
Unfortunately, I can't get decent quality when posting to the web.
I have to
boost brightness, contrast and saturation so that particularly the
sky in
some images look uneven.
A well composed collection. Unnatural color hue and borderline extreme
saturation detract. A more natural look would improve..IMHO.
Jack
--- Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have added a few more images to my portfolio at Photo.net.
Unfortunately, I can't get decent quality when posting
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Some great shots, but most are oversaturated, some are too bright and too
contrasty. If you set the colorspace to SRGB and do a Save for Web in
PhotoShop, you shouldn't have any problems maintaining the look of your
original on
I'm using Velvia
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 6:57 PM
Subject: Re: A few more images
Pål Jensen wrote:
I have added a few more images to my portfolio at Photo.net.
I like both with some reservations:
The crop in either works well, although I'd like a little more of his
chin in the BW version.
I see nothing wrong with the color tonality/density. The BW seems
just a bit dark to me ... this is a fair-skinned, blond man with blue
eyes, he looks a little
Just in case someone will be interested, other than mom ;-)
http://www.dariobonazza.com/puble.htm
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 11/09/07, Pål Jensen, discombobulated, unleashed:
I have added a few more images to my portfolio at Photo.net.
Unfortunately, I can't get decent quality when posting to the web. I have to
boost brightness, contrast and saturation so that particularly the sky in
some images look uneven.
Should be safe unless it has the Ricoh P pin on it.
-Adam
Tim Øsleby wrote:
Adaptall2 KA Rikoh, is that nohnoh on Pentax?
I know there are compatiblity issues with Rikoh lenses on Pentax. Does that
go for adaptors too?
Tim Typo
Mostly Harmless
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Adaptall2 KA Rikoh, is that nohnoh on Pentax?
I know there are compatiblity issues with Rikoh lenses on Pentax. Does that
go for adaptors too?
Tim Typo
Mostly Harmless
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Well that explains the Velvia look:-). Don't get me wrong, they're outstanding.
But I think you'd be able to fine tune them better if you weren't having
trouble in the conversion to web use. Which version of PhotoShop are you using?
Paul
-- Original message --
Thank you.
How do I know if the adaptor has a Pb pin or not.
Let me rephrase it. How do I instruct a seller to look for a P pin? (The
seller of the 400/4 has a Rikoh KA adaptor he could throw into the deal)
He seem to be the kind of guy who knows how to walk and chew gum
simultaneously. So it
On 9/10/07, Paul Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The best kept secret in the photo world for collages and page layouts is
FotoFusion. Download a trial and check it out - The rendering engine is
excellent and if you can limit your sizes to max 13 x 19 @ 300dpi the
Enhanced version should
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 18:29:39 +0200, Pål Jensen wrote
I have added a few more images to my portfolio at Photo.net.
Unfortunately, I can't get decent quality when posting to the web. I
have to boost brightness, contrast and saturation so that
particularly the sky in some images look uneven.
Pal,
You need to look at these with a calibrated monitor!
They are =certainly= not bluish, without contrast, or
undersaturated! In fact, if anything, they tend in
the opposite direction.
Gorgeous scenes and compositions; I'd love to see your
prints sometime--or more accurate Photo.net posts.
That is about where I am at. The locations, lighting and compositions
are excellent, but the colors are just way over the top for me.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, September 11, 2007, 10:42:19 AM, you wrote:
GD On Sep 11, 2007, at 9:29 AM, Pål Jensen wrote:
I have added a few more images to my
It will have a P position on the aperture ring (similar to the A position on
the KA) And it will also have a pin which extends from the mount.
-Adam
Tim Øsleby wrote:
Thank you.
How do I know if the adaptor has a Pb pin or not.
Let me rephrase it. How do I instruct a seller to look for a P
you know you'd love it.
rg2
On 9/11/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You couldn't drag me to such an event in chains.
--- Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the biggest raves in the country is going to
be this weekend in
Baltimore. Why don't you guys go photograph that ;)
I agree that most everything I see is excellent. It looks like Velvia on
acid to me though, and I like Velvia.
Tom C.
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: A few more images
Date:
- Original Message -
From: Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You need to look at these with a calibrated monitor!
They are =certainly= not bluish, without contrast, or
undersaturated! In fact, if anything, they tend in
the opposite direction.
Gorgeous scenes and compositions; I'd love
Thanks again.
What this list knows
Tim Typo
Mostly Harmless
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 8:52 PM
Subject: Re: adaptall adaptor question (Rikoh on Pentax)
It will have a P
On Sep 11, 2007, at 14:42, Pål Jensen wrote:
Ok. So how does this one looks
(http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6406548) (I'll only keep
it here
for a short while)
compared to this one: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6405827
The first one is a save for web from the original
I'm not sure what's more unlikely - Rick enjoying a rave, or hell
freezing over. Or maybe pigs flying. Or me enjoying a rave. I'll
agree with Rick. You better have some damn heavy chains to get me into one.
Rebekah wrote:
you know you'd love it.
rg2
On 9/11/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL
Thanks to all.
I will contact Pentax ASAP and report back
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Had to look Rave up, looks like Disco is back.
Scott Loveless wrote:
I'm not sure what's more unlikely - Rick enjoying a rave, or hell
freezing over. Or maybe pigs flying. Or me enjoying a rave. I'll
agree with Rick. You better have some damn heavy chains to get me into one.
Rebekah
Peter,
I like the sweep of the picture. BTW, are crabbers as cussed and
obstreperous as New England Lobstermen?
John G.
frank theriault wrote:
On 9/11/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've noticed that I shoot a lot of things at 43mm even if I'm using a
zoom. I rather like
I wouldn't want to participate, but I'd love to shoot a hardcore rave. Lots of
photo ops.
-- Original message --
From: graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Had to look Rave up, looks like Disco is back.
Scott Loveless wrote:
I'm not sure what's more unlikely - Rick
Pål Jensen wrote:
Ok. So how does this one looks
(http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6406548) (I'll only keep it
here for a short while)
compared to this one:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6405827
The first one is a save for web from the original but it looks bland to
me
and
John Francis wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:53:01PM +, mike wilson wrote:
From: Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/09/11 Tue PM 12:30:41 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: The occasional 300mm
Hal Davis wrote:
What are thoughts on the Pentax A 300mm
Now I know I'm too too old. What is a rave??
John G.
PS: you can ask me about DX, ssb and cw however O:-)
Rebekah wrote:
you know you'd love it.
rg2
On 9/11/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You couldn't drag me to such an event in chains.
--- Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think that after you've been away from it for awhile, your color
cones begin to recover and allow you to, once again, recognize natural
tones.
Quite a shock, huh? ;-)))
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that most everything I see is excellent. It looks like
Velvia on
acid
It's obviously Velvia.
Scott Loveless wrote:
Pål Jensen wrote:
I have added a few more images to my portfolio at Photo.net.
Unfortunately, I can't get decent quality when posting to the web. I have to
boost brightness, contrast and saturation so that particularly the sky in
some images
Compare it to a F or FA lens. If there's a pin where the drive screw is
yes it's a no-no.
Tim Øsleby wrote:
Adaptall2 KA Rikoh, is that nohnoh on Pentax?
I know there are compatiblity issues with Rikoh lenses on Pentax. Does that
go for adaptors too?
Tim Typo
Mostly Harmless
--
I believe it's the same as the CPC version. Mine never worked in all modes.
Toralf Lund wrote:
Has anyone here tried the Takumar-A 2X teleconverter on the digital
bodies? I'm referring to this unit:
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/teleconverters/Takumar-A_2X.html
I'd like to know if it works
I can't argue with your processing preference if, as you say, you're
trying to produce an image in which the color appears the same as the
slide on a light box.
If that's what you want, then it's right..for you.
Jack
--- Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From:
Hello, everybody...
A few weeks ago, I asked the list if some Agefix fixer that someone gave
to me, and that must be at least 10 years beyond its sell-by date, could
still safely be used. The answer was essentially, do a clearing test...
A couple of days ago I finally got around to doing this
I wouldn't want to participate, but I'd love to shoot a hardcore
rave. Lots of photo ops.
thank goodness, at least someone understands :oP
there's tons of people dancing around and awesome, colored, angled
lighting! Who wouldn't want to take pictures of that? You could even
do a long exposure
Nice conversion. It could use a bit more contrast, not much mind you.
frank theriault wrote:
A reworking of a rather primitive earlier attempt of a street portrait:
http://tinyurl.com/2njs7f
http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RuaIGV2ierI/Aq8/seSXvLHvk2Q/s1600-h/sept_11+001.jpg
The
Not usually, since it's not a commercial venture, in these parts. You
can be shot, for putting your pots out in the wrong location, when
lobstering.
John Graves wrote:
Peter,
I like the sweep of the picture. BTW, are crabbers as cussed and
obstreperous as New England Lobstermen?
John G.
Thank you Mark! That did the trick it seems. I didn't have the right color
space. I'm going to repost the images.
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 11:01 PM
Subject: Re: A few more
Pål Jensen wrote:
Thank you Mark! That did the trick it seems. I didn't have the right color
space. I'm going to repost the images.
And Christian... and Godders and everyone else who said it was color
space from the start...
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML
Pal,
It's 2138 GMT and already Photo.net says the images
don't exist. I would have liked to compare them!
Rick
--- Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You need to look at these with a calibrated
monitor!
They are
On 11/09/07, graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed:
Had to look Rave up, looks like Disco is back
Mark!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 11:34 PM
Subject: Re: A few more images
Pål Jensen wrote:
Thank you Mark! That did the trick it seems. I didn't have the right
color
space. I'm
I don't have in front of me. It is with the seller. So I can't inspect it
myself.
But if he says no pin, then I'll be able to make use of your advice. Thank
you.
Tim Typo
Mostly Harmless
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Pål Jensen wrote:
Thank you Mark! That did the trick it seems. I didn't have the right
color space.
Glad to be of service! (Teaching this stuff on a regular basis
certainly seems to have improved my ability to explain it.)
I'm going to repost the images.
Very much looking forward to
On Sep 11, 2007, at 16:52, Pål Jensen wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 11:34 PM
Subject: Re: A few more images
Pål Jensen wrote:
Thank you Mark! That did the trick it
Utterly spectacular images, Pal.
Rick
--- Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 11:34 PM
Subject: Re: A few more images
Pål Jensen wrote:
Toralf Lund wrote:
Hello, everybody...
A few weeks ago, I asked the list if some Agefix fixer that someone gave
to me, and that must be at least 10 years beyond its sell-by date, could
still safely be used. The answer was essentially, do a clearing test...
A couple of days ago I finally
Very impressive, Dario. Let us know if you ever get
around to translating that Pentax article into
English!
Rick
--- Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just in case someone will be interested, other than
mom ;-)
http://www.dariobonazza.com/puble.htm
Dario
--
PDML
- Original Message -
From: Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Still super vivid from here I sure wish you could come over here,
look over my shoulder, and tell me if it looks like you want it to
from here. WOW that's a lot of color. I kinda like it, though.
REPLY:
After all,
Somewhat better for me, but the unique Velvia blue hue is very
persistent.
Jack
--- Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 11:34 PM
Subject: Re: A few
But my first thoughts are BIG! and HEAVY!
Big heavy, you haven't seen big heavy until you've lugged a 600mm FA for
a mile or so in the bush!
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The occasional 300mm
I like it Frank.
I'd probably try to reduce some of the brightness of the highlights to the
right of his face if it were mine.
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - Charlie (again, in BW)
A reworking of
Doesn't work for me.
The composition pulls my eye to the grasses on the right. The participants
are too small in the image the light is very harsh.
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
What Ken said. I might also brighten up the midrange a wee bit. But
it's an interesting pic and better than the color version. Had to
wait until I got home to comment. Can't trust the monitor at work.
Paul
On Sep 11, 2007, at 7:07 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
I like it Frank.
I'd probably try
A wonderful collection of outdoor images !
Location, location , location - with no disrespect to your photographic
ability.
Thanks for sharing.
Film/digital ? Not that it matters, just curious.
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL
On 12/09/2007, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After all, they are supposed to look colorful and vibrant. Thats why I shot
them! They are mostly shot under spectacular lighting conditions with very
vibrant colors. Velvia helps as well.
Whatever you are trying to acheive it's not working,
I like them now. I might brighten the midrange a bit with a curves
adjustment. But they're spectacular photos. Yes, they're Velvia, and
they're going to look saturated. But it's a look and an appropriate
one for this photography. Very nice.
Paul
On Sep 11, 2007, at 7:03 PM, Pål Jensen wrote:
Nice work!
rg2
On 9/11/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very impressive, Dario. Let us know if you ever get
around to translating that Pentax article into
English!
Rick
--- Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just in case someone will be interested, other than
mom ;-)
On 9/11/07, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But my first thoughts are BIG! and HEAVY!
Big heavy, you haven't seen big heavy until you've lugged a 600mm FA for
a mile or so in the bush!
One day.:-)
Dave
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
what an interesting picture :o) I like it, especially in BW
rg2
On 9/11/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What Ken said. I might also brighten up the midrange a wee bit. But
it's an interesting pic and better than the color version. Had to
wait until I got home to comment. Can't
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
