Thanks John, Jack, Rick... and others.
Tom C.
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: GESO - Downtown I
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:07:20 -0400
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 03:47:01PM -0600, Tom C
Down to around 24mm seems to be the limit for lack of vignetting on 35mm
bodies.
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/10/11 Thu PM 02:37:57 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Q re DA 16-45/4 on Film
My Sigma 10-20 Nikon mount is pretty much usless
Even more bizzare. Wonder why Pentax stepped back from that route? Why
maintain compatibility with an obsolete flash system?
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/10/11 Thu PM 02:57:16 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Af360 worth it? (TTL?)
Err? Both
On the images on screen, nay. Might be different in print form.
From: ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/10/12 Fri AM 03:40:01 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: GESO: opnions wanted on these...
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2538600
36 thumbs
http://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/FARKLE
From: Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/10/11 Thu PM 06:26:52 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Re: Af360 worth it? (TTL?)
farkly?
Regards,
Bob...
Is colour management off in the print driver
(ie only PS is handling
colour management)?
Yes.
Have you tried running a head cleaning cycle?
No.
Thanks. I'll give that a shot along with any other suggestions that come
through.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Perhaps sales of the restricted-compatibility units were underwhelming.
I certainly would not buy a unit with less compatibility unless it added
other necessary features.
-Adam
mike wilson wrote:
Even more bizzare. Wonder why Pentax stepped back from that route? Why
maintain
Very nice. I especially like the store front Picasso. g
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Jack Davis wrote:
Hoping these shots are easily opened. If not, I apologize and will
forward all of your wrath to my (at least for now) GEEK.
Will, perhaps, post some BW examples next.
Jack
Bodie Church..
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=249
Bodie Rust..
Rick Womer wrote:
Here's one from the slide files, that I came across
and scanned while looking for my PUG submission a
couple of weeks ago.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6519964size=lg
The Schloss Leopoldskron (famous for its use in the
outdoor scenes in Sound of Music) sits
Rick,
Love the purple and the granite.
The raindrops make it all look new and fresh.
This photo transports me there...
Regards, Bob S.
On 10/11/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another in my occasional On My Way to Work series:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6520021size=lg
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Wal-Mart and film processing
they
could not print what I saw in the viewfinder.
IIRC, they weren't as bad as wherever K-Mart sent film out
to, where they cut somebody's face in half on a group
photo then tried to tell
This is so pathetic, its almost humorous.
The past 5 years or so, i have made a slide show out of the shots i
have taken at the horse shows and play them before, during and up to
the dancing, at the year end awards banquet, which is Saturday.
On the equine BB i moderate at, i always ask if
Thanks..me too.
The turn off to Bodie is on highway 395 (eastern slope of the
Sierra)just south of the town of Bridgeport. It's a State Historical
Park which is maintained in an, arrested state of decay. The driff
from 395 is nine miles of asphalt followed by three miles of extremely
rough (as the
In a message dated 10/12/2007 8:00:37 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I mentioned my intention to post these two Bodie shots in BW.
I'll cool it now.
Jack
Thanks for comments.
Church..
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=251
Rust..
I mentioned my intention to post these two Bodie shots in BW.
I'll cool it now.
Jack
Thanks for comments.
Church..
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=251
Rust..
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=252
Sad story, Dave. The only way I have found to keep people from stealing your
images off the internet, is to not have them on the internet.
Unfortunately the web was never intended to be secure, it was developed by
academics for academics which in this commercial age folks tend to forget. I
Thanks, Dave.
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice Rick.
The granit makes a nice break in the shot
Dave
On 10/11/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Another in my occasional On My Way to Work
series:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6520021size=lg
Often works that way, doesn't it?
--- Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice capture. The day may have been dreary, but the
light look great/
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: Salzburg
Dave,
OMG, you have guns in Canada and you shoot target practice!
I especially liked the mushrooms and the bridge in the fog.
Some of those other landscapes were pretty nice too...
Happy Thanksgiving (I forget you guys have it a bit earlier!)
Regards, Bob S.
On 10/12/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL
Sure they have beer, they import it from Texas.
Adam Maas wrote:
Scott Loveless wrote:
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Dave,
OMG, you have guns in Canada and you shoot target practice!
They also have cigarettes, beer and Ford pickups. Are you sure these
weren't taken in Arkansas,
It's quite creepy. Looks like something out of a horror film. Quite
appropriate for October. :)
John Celio
LOL ... I'd say strange or quixotic. It keeps playing games with my
eyes. Thanks for commenting.
Godfrey
On Oct 12, 2007, at 5:14 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Hmmm.. Unique. :)
Looks like you had a good time. Duck hunting? Like the mushroom pic. Do you
folks eat turkey up there, or is that strictly a down here thing?
Paul
-- Original message --
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scott Loveless wrote:
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Dave,
OMG, you have guns in Canada and you shoot target practice!
They also have cigarettes, beer and Ford pickups. Are you sure these
weren't taken in Arkansas, Dave? g
Nice pics. Thanks for sharing.
Can't be Arkansas, you don't have beer
Mine are around 23-25 K and 480 by something. I forget what i have
BBPro set at but its small.
Dave
On 10/12/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/10/07, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
Basically, if I can view your image on the screen, I can grab a copy of it.
All you can do is
Congrat's on getting an NHL team Bob. We are still trying here in the
Toronto area.
Dave(not a leaf fan)Brooks
On 10/12/07, Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From the opening game - Ducks vs. Bruins
www.bob.blakely.com/FaceOff.jpg
K10D, SMCP-A* 135/1.8 1/90th @ 2.8, ISO 100 Mode P,
Now that's a strange photo Bob...
A California hockey team celebrating the winning of the Stanley Cup.
I love this time of year -
baseball, football, basketball, and hockey all in season.
I like the face off shot, the banner appears a bit dark.
Regards, Bob S.
On 10/12/07, Bob Blakely [EMAIL
Thanks Paul.
Duck and partridge. Sorry i forgot the firearm diclaimer.:-)
Yes turkey is the biggy for Thanksgiving here to.
Dave
On 10/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like you had a good time. Duck hunting? Like the mushroom pic. Do you
folks eat turkey up there, or
On 10/12/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Dave,
OMG, you have guns in Canada and you shoot target practice!
They also have cigarettes, beer and Ford pickups. Are you sure these
weren't taken in Arkansas, Dave? g
Pretty sure i was in Ontario.:-)
We do have
From the opening game - Ducks vs. Bruins
www.bob.blakely.com/FaceOff.jpg
K10D, SMCP-A* 135/1.8 1/90th @ 2.8, ISO 100 Mode P, Metering: Pattern, Exp
Comp: +1
www.bob.blakely.com/Banner.jpg
K10D, SMCP-A* 135/1.8 1/180th @ 2.4, ISO 100 Mode P, Metering: Pattern, Exp
Comp: +1
Originally PEFs
Sorry Bob, i forgot the Firearm photos on site disclaimer.:-)
The kids like to target practise on balloons. I think the ducks preferr that;:-)
A lot of mushrooms this year, but damaged from wildlife tracks so my
op's were limited.
Dave
On 10/12/07, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave,
On 12/10/07, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
Basically, if I can view your image on the screen, I can grab a copy of it.
All you can do is make it harder for me.
I'm thinking of reducing file sizes on my online pics. I'm thinking
maybe 4k for a pic 800X600.
Viewers see a few pixels of
On 10/12/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure they have beer, they import it from Texas.
Other way around.
Dave
Adam Maas wrote:
Scott Loveless wrote:
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Dave,
OMG, you have guns in Canada and you shoot target practice!
They also have cigarettes,
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Dave,
OMG, you have guns in Canada and you shoot target practice!
They also have cigarettes, beer and Ford pickups. Are you sure these
weren't taken in Arkansas, Dave? g
Nice pics. Thanks for sharing.
On 10/12/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Flash probably won't work either, there are plenty of flash decoders
that can be used to get the images if someone wants to go through the
trouble.
Scott Loveless wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
Well this morning i received an email from a friend on the committee
saying some one emailed heR
I enjoyed them all.
Good work
Dave
On 10/11/07, Ted Beilby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally got around to posting a few shots on PhotoNet from my trip this
summer. Will change out in a week or so. Comments are welcomed. Ted
http://photo.net/photodb/member-photos?user_id=2239777include=all
On Oct 12, 2007, at 7:58 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
I mentioned my intention to post these two Bodie shots in BW.
I like the color renderings more.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Nice Rick.
The granit makes a nice break in the shot
Dave
On 10/11/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another in my occasional On My Way to Work series:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6520021size=lg
The night before last we had our first rain in 6
weeks. I took my camera
I get that. Thanks, Marnie.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/12/2007 8:00:37 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I mentioned my intention to post these two Bodie shots in BW.
I'll cool it now.
Jack
Thanks for comments.
Church..
In most cases, I prefer the real pic to the posterized versions.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mike wilson wrote:
On the images on screen, nay. Might be different in print form.
Ok do you mean you prefer the real pics to
- Original Message -
From: graywolf
Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Right clicked images find there way home
I would send the person who submitted your photos an invoice for your
standard
charge and take them to small claims court if they do not pay it.
And you'd loose. This isn't
In a message dated 10/11/2007 1:58:26 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Finally got around to posting a few shots on PhotoNet from my trip this
summer. Will change out in a week or so. Comments are welcomed. Ted
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Her only
comment was, have a look and enjoy.
snip
Now that takes some balls.
Raises my suspicions even further about Canadian women.
-
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R)
Thanks! My preference too.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/11/2007 5:44:51 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hoping these shots are easily opened. If not, I apologize and will
forward all of your wrath to my (at least for now) GEEK.
Will,
mike wilson wrote:
On the images on screen, nay. Might be different in print form.
Ok do you mean you prefer the real pics to the posterized ones? Or none
of em look good on your screen ?
these are all flatbed scans from 8 x 10 prints from Tri-x, btw.
ann
From: ann sanfedele [EMAIL
Ted Beilby wrote:
Ann: some of the posterized work for me, example: The Manhattan Cafe. Others
don't. sorry I can't give you more feedback. I also use posterization at
times but usually with my color shots from the drag strip. Things like
clouds and smoke, etc seem to work best for me with
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless
Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Right clicked images find there way home
David J Brooks wrote:
Well this morning i received an email from a friend on the committee
saying some one emailed heR some files for the slide show. Her only
comment was,
Appreciated comments, Adam. Thanks!
Jack
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
Hoping these shots are easily opened. If not, I apologize and will
forward all of your wrath to my (at least for now) GEEK.
Will, perhaps, post some BW examples next.
Jack
Bodie
Thanks Bob! Glad you like it.
--- Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick,
Love the purple and the granite.
The raindrops make it all look new and fresh.
This photo transports me there...
Regards, Bob S.
On 10/11/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Another in my occasional On
David J Brooks wrote:
Well this morning i received an email from a friend on the committee
saying some one emailed heR some files for the slide show. Her only
comment was, have a look and enjoy.
So, i opened them up, about 12 of them, and lo and behold, about 5 of
them were taken from my
Jack,
Nice to see the photos.
They would be great in a magazine article.
Very rich, vibrant color...
Regards, Bob S.
On 10/12/07, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
Hoping these shots are easily opened. If not, I apologize and will
forward all of your wrath to my (at least
What city, BTW? I couldn't find any indication.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/12/2007 1:44 AM
The country mouse went back downtown this afternoon after
Hey. They probably ran it through C-41 chemicals.
Strangely they came back as slides as well as prints. Frankly, I
don't know what on earth they did.
rg2
On 10/10/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: cbwaters
Subject: Re: More film processing
Well, i think you got a great shot there.
Dave
On 10/8/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I shot this yesterday during the Blue Angels air show in San Francisco. It
has
minimal editing, so the colors still look a little weird.
I like them bother but the second is my favorite.
Missed the original i think. Were abouts is this Jack.
Dave
On 10/12/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for valued comments, Paul.
I think its remote high altitude location and long severe winter
weather helps. It's a State
I'm finding if my colour gets dark, i need to run a head clean, and
then do a calibrate as well.
Seems to clear up that problem.
Also i check for what Dave suggested to , as i sometimes forget.
Dave Brooks
On 10/12/07, Jerome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to print some images to Epson
On 10/12/07, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even more bizzare. Wonder why Pentax stepped back from that route? Why
maintain compatibility with an obsolete flash system?
To work with the non existent K1D.??:-)
Dave
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Thanks to all who commented. Seems this ones a winner, which is good,a
s i really like this one.
It is a bit to sepia even using the low setting on the camera, and i
did tone it down a bit with the photofilter.
The camera atleast does not over ride the phot but makes a copy, so
i'll trya
Thanks Frank.
Last year, they all blew off the trees before our trip, this year
everything is late.
One day.:-)
Dave
On 10/11/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/10/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi gang.
Been a bit tied up with orders and a nice relaxing 4
Nice stuff, particularly Bodie Rust. How is this protected from
vandals? Security guards?
Paul
On Oct 11, 2007, at 8:38 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Hoping these shots are easily opened. If not, I apologize and will
forward all of your wrath to my (at least for now) GEEK.
Will, perhaps, post some
Is colour management off in the print driver (ie only PS is handling
colour management)?
Have you tried running a head cleaning cycle?
Cheers,
Dave
On 10/12/07, Jerome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to print some images to Epson Enhanced Matte paper using the
Mac version of Photoshop
Well seen. Good job. I especially like Mind Games.
Paul
On Oct 11, 2007, at 5:47 PM, Tom C wrote:
A few shots from a short detour in downtown Dallas after work.
Lot's of
good architecture. Very little captured here. Not my normal stuff of
course.
I'm trying to print some images to Epson Enhanced Matte paper using the
Mac version of Photoshop CS2 and an Epson R1800. I've had the printer for
4 months now and what is weird is I haven't had this problem prior to
yesterday. I'm not sure what changed, but my prints are suddenly way off
wrt color
Most all of mine are film scans, FTM, but there's no doubt it's
seriously ill. ;-)
Jack
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of his submissions are of the 67 variety.
Thought film was dead.
Dave
On 10/12/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just received the November
Kewl. Gotta start using the word. I love FARKLEs!
Regards,
Bob...
Art is not a reflection of reality. it is the reality of a reflection.
-Jean Luc Godard
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks. Somewhere in my archives, I have a pile of photos of what
remained in 1984. Last time I was there, 90% of that was obliterated.
It was always a curiosity to me that this neat little rail system
that connected up the corners of lower Westchester, which at the time
was quite rural,
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 10:53:57AM -0400, graywolf wrote:
Sad story, Dave. The only way I have found to keep people from stealing your
images off the internet, is to not have them on the internet.
Unfortunately the web was never intended to be secure, it was developed by
academics for
Bill
I have been trying the right click script you sent me, on various
spots in the pages Breeze Browser Pro produces.
Just thinking out load, but should that script be going some were in
the main index page instead.
It does not seem to do anything in the BBPro pages.
Dave
On 10/12/07,
It's a fun gallery Ann, I think I've seen most of these before but it's
fun paging through them.
ann sanfedele wrote:
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2538600
36 thumbs here the first 12 most of you know -- they are in my book
ad first calendar,
the second set are 12 more from the
Thanks Paul.
I had some trouble with theexposure and sky, probably due to the fog.
Fore ground is an access road to the water, so i wanted to cut as much
of that out.
Dave
On 10/11/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like this composition and gray day light. I might like it
Chuck Norris counted to infinity, twice.
Dave
On 10/11/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ann sanfedele wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
...you *don't* want the bug I picked up in Chicago!
Spent Saturday and Sunday pretty much non-functional. Well enough to
teach classes on Tuesday
I really like the Cloud Maker. GREAT shot. City Guardian is nice
because of the color and contrast.
I too despise big cities. I have seldom been to the downtown area of
Orlando because of that.
Walt
On 10/12/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The country mouse went back downtown this afternoon
In a message dated 10/11/2007 8:36:58 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2538600
I don't mind them posterized, ann. Adds an element of timelessness,
abstractness, universality. I often do it to my own. But you do have that
already in
[dropping in mid-thread 'cause I'm months behind]
Igor Roshchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of all the non-specialized labs, I like Wal-Mart's one-hour service.
It looks like its relatively consistent acceptable quality.
They usually don't mind redoing the prints if you don't like the
colors,
In a message dated 10/11/2007 5:44:51 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hoping these shots are easily opened. If not, I apologize and will
forward all of your wrath to my (at least for now) GEEK.
Will, perhaps, post some BW examples next.
Jack
Bodie Church..
In a message dated 10/11/2007 6:37:56 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's one from the slide files, that I came across
and scanned while looking for my PUG submission a
couple of weeks ago.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6519964size=lg
The Schloss
Rebekah wrote:
Hey. They probably ran it through C-41 chemicals.
Strangely they came back as slides as well as prints. Frankly, I
don't know what on earth they did.
Are the slides negatives or positives? If they're negatives, they most
definitely souped them in C-41.
--
Scott
Thanks for valued comments, Paul.
I think its remote high altitude location and long severe winter
weather helps. It's a State Historical Park with a gate attendant
collecting a modest entry fee. I, also, saw a couple uniformed
personnel strolling around looking helpful, so I gather they have what
I like these as well. I believe the Pegasus horse is the old Mobil oil logo. I
remember seeing it on their blimp when I was a child. I like Cloud Maker, but
I'd like it better if it were absolutely symmetrical. You could fix it with PS
Transform tools and a crop.
Paul
-- Original
Hmmm.. Unique. :)
Jack
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This one caught my eye as I was browsing some older work.
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/42a.htm
Comments, critique, other notions always appreciated.
enjoy
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Nicely done, Rick. I find the foreground softness a little
distracting because it's bright ... if you pushed it down a little
bit, my eye would settle more easily.
Godfrey
Rick Womer wrote:
Here's one from the slide files, that I came across
and scanned while looking for my PUG submission
Ann: some of the posterized work for me, example: The Manhattan Cafe. Others
don't. sorry I can't give you more feedback. I also use posterization at
times but usually with my color shots from the drag strip. Things like
clouds and smoke, etc seem to work best for me with this process. Another
Just received the November issue of pop Photo. Page 24 is an article
titled, Pentaxian Profile: Kerrick James.
It's a full page and carries four photos, 'prox a half page well
written bio and the website address: WWW.PENTAXIAN.COM.
Thought I recognized one of the accompanying images and the name,
LOL ... I'd say strange or quixotic. It keeps playing games with my
eyes. Thanks for commenting.
Godfrey
On Oct 12, 2007, at 5:14 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Hmmm.. Unique. :)
This one caught my eye as I was browsing some older work.
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/42a.htm
--
Hmmm... A grey graduated masking layer in Elements 4?
Actually, I've not used layers successfully yet.
Thanks for the comment!
Rick
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicely done, Rick. I find the foreground softness a
little
distracting because it's bright ... if you pushed
Some of his submissions are of the 67 variety.
Thought film was dead.
Dave
On 10/12/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just received the November issue of pop Photo. Page 24 is an article
titled, Pentaxian Profile: Kerrick James.
It's a full page and carries four photos, 'prox a half
Thanks, Adam. I don't know how much difference it
would make. Hand-holding with ISO 100 film on a dim
day didn't leave me a lot of aperture latitude,
though.
Rick
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting shot, but I would have preferred the
foreground leaves to be
in focus,
On 10/10/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hell, Kodak and Fuji propaganda has worked too well, I know semi serious
photographers who don't realize that Chromogenic BW film is different
from Tri-X
A few years ago, when i took the darkroom class, the write up said to
bring a roll of BW
Cloud Maker is very well seen. Most impressive is that, unlike the
others in this series, you assembled the elements on your own.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like these as well. I believe the Pegasus horse is the old Mobil
oil logo. I remember seeing it on their blimp when I was a
Many thanks, Bob.
Jack
--- Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack,
Nice to see the photos.
They would be great in a magazine article.
Very rich, vibrant color...
Regards, Bob S.
On 10/12/07, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
Hoping these shots are easily
Hi Pentaxians,
I was in upstate New York this weekend, at the Eddie Adams workshop.
It was an amazingly intense four days, sleeping 3-4 hours per night,
listening to some great talks, and shooting in some cases amazing work
(I'm a bit disappointed with my own work from the weekend though.)
True, that would be rather limiting to DoF.
-Adam
Rick Womer wrote:
Thanks, Adam. I don't know how much difference it
would make. Hand-holding with ISO 100 film on a dim
day didn't leave me a lot of aperture latitude,
though.
Rick
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We can always hope that we'll have one by 2067. But earlier this year the
League just shut down our last chance at getting professional hockey anytime
soon.
-Adam
Who is entirely serious.
David J Brooks wrote:
Congrat's on getting an NHL team Bob. We are still trying here in the
Toronto
Maybe they think they've solved the problem with TTL flash and the next
High spec. body will include it. I know I've observed problems with
P-TTL, usually subjects flinching or closing their eyes. Not many but a few.
mike wilson wrote:
Even more bizzare. Wonder why Pentax stepped back from
Remember that the 540 and 360 both predate the K10D, the first high-end body to
lack plain digital TTL support.
-Adam
P. J. Alling wrote:
Maybe they think they've solved the problem with TTL flash and the next
High spec. body will include it. I know I've observed problems with
P-TTL,
Ann, I'd definitely go with the original photos. In my opinion
posterization is used mostly to save uninteresting and or poorly exposed
photographs. In this case you don't have either problem. I also think it
works better on color images with subjects that require little detail to
start with.
Appreciate the opinion.
Jack
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 12, 2007, at 7:58 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
I mentioned my intention to post these two Bodie shots in BW.
I like the color renderings more.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/2007-madawaska/index.htm
No adjustments, just page made in BBPro.
Some K10D and D200 shots.
Enjoy
Dave
--
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
P. J. Alling wrote:
Ann, I'd definitely go with the original photos. In my opinion
posterization is used mostly to save uninteresting and or poorly exposed
photographs. In this case you don't have either problem. I also think it
works better on color images with subjects that require little
Godfry, IMHO, this print needs to be in context with a body of work. As it
stands it just doesn't work for me.
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO 2007 - 42a - GDG
This one caught my eye as I was
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
